Adaptation and Validation of The School Bystander Behaviour Scale (SBBS) Instrumen for Junior High School Students: Rasch Model Analysis
Adaptasi dan Validasi Instrumen School Bystander Behaviour Scale (SBBS) untuk Siswa SMP: Analisis Rasch Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.9514Keywords:
instrument adaptation, rasch model, School Bystander Behaviour Scale (SBBS)Abstract
The School Bystander Behavior Scale (SBBS) is one of the instruments that can measure the tendency of bystander students involved in bullying. This study aims to adapt the School Bystander Behavior Scale (SBBS) instrument into Indonesian and analyze the quality of its psychometric properties. Rasch model is used as the testing method on data obtained from 251 respondents who are 7th, 8th, and 9th grade students on junior high school which was selected using proportionate stratified random sampling. The results of the study indicate that the adapted instrument has sufficient unidimensionality and good reliability, but some items have low validity. Therefore, the instrument requires further review to improve its psychometric properties and performance.
Downloads
References
P. Fischer et al., “The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 137, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2011.
J. Hudson and A. Bruckman, “The Bystander Effect: A Lens for Understanding Patterns of Participation,” J. Learn. Sci. - J LEARN SCI, vol. 13, pp. 165–195, Apr. 2004.
A. Halimah, A. Khumas, and K. Zainuddin, “Persepsi pada Bystander terhadap Intensitas Bullying pada Siswa SMP,” J. Psikol., vol. 42, p. 129, Aug. 2015.
E. Haru, “Perilaku Bullying Di Kalangan Pelajar,” J. Altern. Wacana Ilm. Interkultural, vol. 11, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2022.
A. Prasetyo, “Bullying di Sekolah dan Dampaknya bagi Masa Depan Anak,” El-Tarbawi, vol. 4, pp. 19–26, Jan. 2014.
N. Karisma, A. Rofiah, S. Afifah, and Y. Manik, “Kesehatan Mental Remaja dan Tren Bunuh Diri: Peran Masyarakat Mengatasi Kasus Bullying di Indonesia,” Edu Cendikia J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 3, pp. 560–567, Jan. 2024.
W. D. Lestari, T. M. Anggriana, and B. D. Pratama, “Pengaruh Empati Dan Bystander Effect Terhadap Perilaku Prososial Siswa SMP,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Bimbing. Dan Konseling, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2022.
M. B. A. Tumon, “Studi Deskriptif Perilaku Bullying Pada Remaja,” Calyptra, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Sept. 2014.
R. Thornberg and T. Jungert, “Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy,” J. Adolesc., vol. 36, pp. 475–483, Mar. 2013.
R. Thornberg, T. Pozzoli, and G. Gini, “Defending or Remaining Passive as a Bystander of School Bullying in Sweden: The Role of Moral Disengagement and Antibullying Class Norms,” J. Interpers. Violence, vol. 37, pp. 1–24, Aug. 2021.
C. Salmivalli, “Bullying and the peer group: A review,” Aggress. Violent Behav., vol. 15, pp. 112–120, Mar. 2010.
S. Padgett and C. Notar, “Bystanders are the Key to Stopping Bullying,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, pp. 33–41, Aug. 2013.
N. M. D. Sulistiowati, I. G. A. N. F. Wulansari, K. E. Swedarma, A. P. Purnama, and N. P. Kresnayanti, “Gambaran Perilaku Bullying Dan Perilaku Mencari Bantuan Remaja SMP Di Kota Denpasar,” J. Ilmu Keperawatan Jiwa, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2022.
S. F. D. Maharani and I. S. Borualogo, “Hubungan antara Iklim Sekolah dan Subjective Well-Being Siswa SMP Korban Perundungan Siber di Kota Bandung,” Bdg. Conf. Ser. Psychol. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 622–631, July 2022.
R. A. Sestiani and A. Muhid, “Pentingnya Dukungan Sosial Terhadap Kepercayaan Diri Penyintas Bullying: Literature Review,” TEMATIK, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2022.
A. Nickerson, A. Aloe, J. Livingston, and T. Feeley, “Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment,” J. Adolesc., vol. 37, pp. 391–400, June 2014.
M. Demaray, K. Summers, L. Jenkins, and L. Davidson Becker, “Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ) : Establishing a Reliable and Valid Measure,” J. Sch. Violence, vol. 15, Dec. 2014.
F. Goossens and T. Olthof, “The New Participant Role Scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity,” Sage J., vol. 26, pp. 146–151, Apr. 2017.
Z. Suárez-García, R. Thornberg, and D. Álvarez-García, “Validation of a Scale for Assessing Bystander Responses in Bullying,” Psicothema, vol. 33, pp. 623–630, Oct. 2021.
A. Costa, M. Vives, and J. Corey, “On Language Processing Shaping Decision Making,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 26, pp. 146–151, Apr. 2017.
Y. E. Suryani, “Aplikasi Rasch Model dalam Mengevaluasi Intelligenz Structure Test (IST),” Psikohumaniora J. Penelit. Psikol., vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2018.
D. E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, F. Guillemin, and M. B. Ferraz, “Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures:,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 24, Art. no. 24, Dec. 2000.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017. Accessed: Sept. 04, 2024.
I. Machali, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Panduan Praktis Merencanakan, Melaksanakan, dan Analisis dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021.
B. Sumintono and W. Widhiarso, Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Surabaya, 2014.
S. Golia and E. Brentari, “Unidimensionality in the Rasch model: how to detect and interpret,” Statistica, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 253–261, Sept. 2007.
F. M. Hamzah, M. N. A. Rashid, M. N. A. R. Rahman, and Md. M. Rasul, “Rasch Model Analysis for Evaluating Validity and Reliability of Authentic Learning Instruments in Malaysian Polytechnics,” Int. J. Innov., vol. 9, no. 7, 2019.
G. Hamdu, F. N. Fuadi, A. Yulianto, and Y. S. Akhirani, “Items Quality Analysis Using Rasch Model To Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill On Stem Learning,” JPI J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2020.
K. P. Prayoga, D. Suryana, M. Supriatna, and N. Budiman, “Penggunaan Rasch Model Untuk Menganalisis Konstruk Instrumen Kontrol Diri Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah,” G-Couns J. Bimbing. Dan Konseling, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 367–381, Aug. 2024.
Y. Handayani, R. Rahmawati, and W. Widiasih, “Using Rasch Model to Analyze Reliability and Validity of Concept Mastery Test on Electricity and Magnetism Topic,” JIPF J. Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 226–239, May 2023.
S. Hayati, S. W. Hidayanti, and A. Rizki, “Analisis Rasch Model: Mengukur Kualitas Butir Soal Tes Tashrif Lughawi,” Intelektualita, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 1, July 2024.
I. F. Apriani, R. W. Muharram, I. Rachmawati, L. Susilawati, and G. Islamati, “Kemampuan Perkalian dan Pembagian Bilangan Cacah Menggunakan RASCH Model untuk Siswa Kelas IV SD,” Dwija Cendekia J. Ris. Pedagog., vol. 7, no. 2, Aug. 2023.
I. Rivaldo, H. Sutrisno, and A. C. Manik, “The Use of The Rasch Model to Develop Students’ Conception of Chemistry Learning Instruments During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Pendidik. Kim. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2022.
Y. A. Rahman, L. H. Rentina, and U. R. Dhini, “Person Fit Analysis For Assessing Academic Writing Performance Using Rasch Model,” J. Pendidik. Glas., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, July 2023.
G. Karabatsos, “Comparing the Aberrant Response Detection Performance of Thirty-Six Person-Fit Statistics,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 277–298, 2003.
A. Anggraini and M. Muntazhimah, “Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah,” Aksioma J. Program Studi Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2021.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
