Implementation of Fuzzy Mamdani's Logic in Determining Teacher Performance Appraisal (Case Study: SDN Pagerwojo)
Implementasi Logika Fuzzy Mamdani dalam Menentuka Penilaian Kinerja Guru (Studi Kasus: SDN Pagerwojo)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.4508Keywords:
teacher, fuzzy logic, performance appraisal, mamdaniAbstract
Teacher performance appraisal is one way that can be used to assess whether a teacher deserves a promotion or obtaining teacher certification. In the assessment of teacher performance conducted at SDN Pagerwojo, there is a problem, namely that the time needed to obtain results is relatively long. To address these problems, a teacher performance appraisal system using the Mamdani method is needed. The variable assessment criteria used include pedagogic, personal, social, and professional. The membership functions of each criterion are bad, sufficient, and good. The result of the study is that the teacher performance appraisal system using the fuzzy Mamdani logic method can be used to find out the results of teacher performance scores in a short time.
Downloads
References
M. Negara, P. A. Negara, D. A. N. R. Birokrasi, and R. Indonesia, “Menteri negara pendayagunaan aparatur negara dan reformasi birokrasi republik indonesia,” vol. 1999, 2009.
A. Muhammad and Gusrianty, “Pengembangan Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Menengah Pertama ( SMP ) Menggunakan Logika Fuzzy ( Studi Kasus : SMP Negeri 3 Mandau ),” J. Mhs. Apl. Teknol. Komput. dan Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://www.ejournal.pelitaindonesia.ac.id/JMApTeKsi/index.php/JOM/article/view/391/335.
H. Heriyansyah, “Guru Adalah Manajer Sesungguhnya Di Sekolah,” Islam. Manag. J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 116–127, 2018, doi: 10.30868/im.v1i01.218.
A. Dudung, “Kompetensi Profesional Guru,” JKKP (Jurnal Kesejaht. Kel. dan Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2018, doi: 10.21009/jkkp.051.02.
K. H. Hanif, A. Yudhana, and A. Fadlil, “Analisis Penilaian Guru Memakai Metode Analityc Heararchy Process ( AHP ),” Seri Pros. Semin. Nas. Din. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 186–189, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://prosiding.senadi.upy.ac.id/index.php/senadi/article/view/153%0Ahttp://prosiding.senadi.upy.ac.id/index.php/senadi/article/download/153/144.
H. Rohman, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Kinerja Guru,” J. Madinasika J. Manaj. Pendidik. dan Kegur., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 92–102, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnalunma.ac.id/index.php/madinasika.
S. R. Andani, “Fuzzy Mamdani Dalam Menentukan Tingkat,” Semin. Nas. Inform. 2013, vol. 2013, no. semnasIF, pp. 57–65, 2013.
M. Waruwu, “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method),” J. Pendidik. Tambusai , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2896–2910, 2023.
L. E. Richter, A. Carlos, and D. M. Beber, “N Title,” pp. 1–20.
E. Sutriani and R. Octaviani, “Keabsahan data,” INA-Rxiv, pp. 1–22, 2019.
N. C. Ezpinoza Juanillo and A. Rupa Huayllapuma, “Struktur diversi,” vol. 15, pp. 1–26, 2018.
R. Ananda, S. Nurjanah, M. Rahma, and R. Ernita, “Analisis Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Sekolah Dasar,” JIIP - J. Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 9657–9661, 2023, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v6i12.3294.
“Mampu mendeskripsikan tujuan,” no. 21022109, 2005.
Y. G. Mia and S. Sulastri, “Analisis Kompetensi Profesional Guru,” J. Pract. Learn. Educ. Dev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2023, doi: 10.58737/jpled.v3i1.93.
A. Mardiana, D. Zalilludin, and D. Fitriani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Keluarga Miskin Menggunakan Logika Fuzzy Tsukamoto,” INFOTECH J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 24–29, 2020.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
