Primary School Students' Mathematical Literacy in Solving Multiple-Solution
Literasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Multiple-Solution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.4234Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy, Multiple-Solution, Problem-SolvingAbstract
This study aims to analyze primary school students' mathematical literacy (ML) in solving multiple-solution (MS) problems. We call students ML to solve MS with MS-ML. The research subjects are students from grade four in a Sidoarjo, East Java primary school. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a case study approach. The instruments used were an MS-ML test and an interview. Interviews were conducted with several students who were selected through the MS-ML category. There are three indicators of MS-ML: the formulating stage, the employing stage, and the interpreting stage. The results of the analysis showed that there were appropriate and inappropriate MS-ML categories. Most students are in the inappropriate MS-ML category. Many students struggle to formulate, employ, and interpret the correct divergent solution. We suggest that one familiarize oneself with divergent ML-MS-based problem-solving in learning and teaching, namely building ML problem-solving with multiple solutions or MS strategies.
Downloads
References
OECD, PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en.
Kemdikbud, Panduan penguatan literasi dan numerasi di sekolah. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pauddikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/bukuelektronik/public/assets/img/flipbook/Panduan_Penguatan_Literasi_dan_Numerasi_di_Sekolah_bf1426239f_compressed.pdf
E. Nagasaki, “Mathematical literacy for living in the highly information-and-technology- oriented in the 21st century: Mathematics education from the perspective of human life in society,” Sel. Regul. Lect. from 12th Int. Congr. Math. Educ., pp. 607–628, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6.
X. Yang, L. J. Kuo, and L. Jiang, “Connecting theory and practice: A systematic review of K-5 science and math literacy instruction,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 203–219, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09957-4.
H. Lanya, M. Zayyadi, and S. K. Sulfiah, “Students’ mathematical literacy on the performance of PISA questions : What is gender correlation?,” J. Didakt. Mat., vol. 4185, pp. 222–234, 2021, doi: 10.24815/jdm.v8i2.20570.
H. C. She, K. Stacey, and W. H. Schmidt, “Science and mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 16, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1.
R. Hera and N. Sari, “Literasi matematika: Apa, mengapa dan bagaimana?,” Semin. Nas. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat. UNY, pp. 713–720, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://seminar.uny.ac.id/semnasmatematika/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.semnasmatematika/files/banner/PM-102.pdf
B. W. Purnomo and A. F. Sari, “Literasi matematika siswa IPS dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konteks saintifik,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 357–368, 2021, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v10i3.990.
F. Khikmiyah and M. Midjan, “Pengembangan buku ajar literasi matematika untuk pembelajaran di SMP,” J. Silogisme Kaji. Ilmu Mat. dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 15, 2017, doi: 10.24269/js.v1i2.275.
S. D. Nirmala, “Problematika rendahnya kemampuan literasi siswa di sekolah dasar,” Prim. J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 393, 2022, doi: 10.33578/jpfkip.v11i2.8851.
A. Schleicher, PISA 2018 : Insights and interpretations. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf
I. G. P. Suharta and I. M. Suarjana, “A case study on mathematical literacy of prospective elementary school teachers,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 413–424, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ iji.2018.11228a.
R. Masfufah and E. A. Afriansyah, “Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa melalui soal PISA,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 291–300, 2021, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.825.
C. S. Große and A. Renkl, “Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning *,” vol. 16, pp. 122–138, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.001.
R. Leikin and A. Levav-Waynberg, “Development of teachers’ conceptions through learning and teaching: The meaning and potential of multiple-solution tasks,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 203–223, 2009, doi: 10.1080/14926150903314305.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
