Preprint has been published in a journal as an article
Preprint / Version 1

Elementary School Students' Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Solving Fraction Problems


Pengetahuan Konseptual dan Prosedural Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pecahan

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.3982

Keywords:

Concepts, Procedures, Fractions

Abstract

Conceptual and procedural knowledge is fundamental for students to comprehensively understand and solve fraction problems. However, empirical studies indicate that elementary school students still do not have adequate conceptual and procedural knowledge in solving fraction problems. This study aimed to analyze the forms of conceptual and procedural knowledge of elementary school students in solving fraction problems. This study used qualitative methods involving 86 elementary school student participants. The data analysis used was descriptive analysis with data collection methods using tests, interviews, and documentation. Empirical research showed that students can successfully use conceptual and procedural knowledge of fractions in certain forms. There are three forms of conceptual knowledge of fractions and four forms of procedural knowledge of fractions. The results of this study have implications for educators or academics to emphasize learning by integrating forms of conceptual and procedural knowledge so that students avoid failure in solving fraction problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Dogan-Coskun, “The analysis of the problems posed by pre-service elementary teachers for the addition of fractions,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1517–1532, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12197a.

I. Fauzi and D. Suryadi, “Learning obstacle the addition and subtraction of fraction in grade 5 elementary schools,” 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.18326/mdr.v12i1.50-67.

T. Karika and C. Csikos, “A test for understanding simple fractions among 5th grade students at the beginning of lower secondary education,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/11654.

D. R. Laidin and K. A. Tengah, “Applying butterfly method in the learning of addition and subtraction of fractions,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2021, doi: 10.22342/jpm.15.2.13934.161-174.

L. Zhang, J. Shang, T. Pelton, and L. F. Pelton, “Supporting primary students’ learning of fraction conceptual knowledge through digital games,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 540–548, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12422.

S. M. Karamarkovich and T. Rutherford, “Fraction errors in a digital mathematics environment: Latent class and transition analysis,” J. Numer. Cogn., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 158–188, 2019, doi: 10.5964/jnc.v5i2.150.

M. M. Flores, V. M. Hinton, and J. M. Meyer, “Teaching fraction concepts using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 165–175, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0741932518795477.

A. B. Bennett, L. J. Button, and L. T. Nelson, Mathematics for elementary teachers : A conceptual approach, ninth edition. 2012.

Y. Deringol, “Misconceptions of primary school students about the subject of fractions,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i1.16290.

M. A. Simon, N. Placa, A. Avitzur, and M. Kara, “Promoting a concept of fraction-as-measure: A study of the learning through activity research program,” J. Math. Behav., vol. 52, no. February, pp. 122–133, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.004.

K. Durkin and B. Rittle-Johnson, “Diagnosing misconceptions: Revealing changing decimal fraction knowledge,” Learn. Instr., vol. 37, pp. 21–29, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.003.

K. Lenz, A. Dreher, L. Holzäpfel, and G. Wittmann, “Are conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge empirically separable? The case of fractions,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 809–829, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12333.

D. W. Braithwaite and L. Sprague, “Conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognition in routine and nonroutine problem solving,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 45, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.1111/cogs.13048.

R. Maulina, C. M. Zubainur, and Bahrun, “Conceptual and procedural knowledge of junior high school students through realistic mathematics education (RME) approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1460, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012017.

K. H. Canobi, “Concept-procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction,” J. Exp. Child Psychol., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 131–149, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008.

J. R. Star and G. J. Stylianides, “Procedural and conceptual knowledge: exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 169–181, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14926156.2013.784828.

A. J. Baroody, Y. Feil, and A. R. Johnson, “An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge,” 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30034952.

N. A. Abbas, N. A. Abdullah, M. Shahrill, and K. A. Tengah, “Primary school pupils’ performance on the addition of fractions: Conceptual and procedural knowledge,” vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 227–238, 2022, doi: 10.22342/jpm.16.2.17811.227-238.

Nahdi and Jatisunda, “Conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge: A case study on learning mathematics of fractional material in elementary school,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042037.

L. R. Wiest and F. O. Amankonah, “Conceptual versus procedural approaches to ordering fractions,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2021, doi: 10.30935/scimath/9534.

N. K. Manandhar, B. P. Pant, and S. D. Dawadi, “Conceptual and procedural knowledge of students of Nepal in algebra: A mixed method study,” Contemp. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. ep22005, 2022, doi: 10.30935/conmaths/11723.

B. Rittle-Johnson, “Developing mathematics knowledge,” Child Dev. Perspect., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 184–190, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cdep.12229.

W. Saban, G. Raz, R. H. Grabner, S. Gabay, and R. C. Kadosh, “Primitive visual channels have a causal role in cognitive transfer,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88271-y.

B. Rittle-Johnson, M. Schneider, and J. R. Star, “Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 587–597, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x.

S. Pirie and T. Kieren, “A recursive theory of mathematical understanding.,” in For the Learning of Mathematics, Canada: Motreal, Canada: FLM Publishing Association., 1989, pp. 7–11.

S. Morano and P. J. Riccomini, “Demonstrating conceptual understanding of fraction arithmetic: An analysis of pre-service special and general educators’ visual representations,” Teach. Educ. Spec. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 314–331, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0888406419880540.

M. A. Simon, “Developing a concept of multiplication of fractions: Building on constructivist and sociocultural theory,” pp. 193–212, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00491-0_9.

Y. F. Hussein, “Conceptual knowlegde and its importance in teaching mathematics,” Middle East. J. Res. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–65, 2022, [Online]. Available: doi: https://doi.org/ 10.47631/mejress.v3i1.445

N. I. Laily, Sunardi, N. Yuliati, E. N. Imamah, and M. P. Sari, “The profile of students conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge in solving geometry problems based on van hiele levels,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1538, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012080.

H. T. M. Phuong, “Measuring conceptual understanding, procedural fluency and integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematical problem solving,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag., vol. 8, no. 05, pp. 1334–1350, 2020, doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v8i05.el02.

H. Idrus, S. S. A. Rahim, and H. Zulnaidi, “Conceptual knowledge in area measurement for primary school students: A systematic review,” STEM Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2022, doi: 10.3934/steme.2022003.

A. Tesfaye, N. Arefayne, K. Micael, M. Education, and M. Education, “Early grade children procedural and conceptual knowledge in number pattern concept at Halaba,” Dev. Ctry. Stud., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.7176/dcs/10-12-01.

D. Hurrell, “Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers.,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 57–71, 2021, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4.

J. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, fourth edition. Boston, MA: Boston, MA: Pearson Education, 2012.

M. A. Al-Mutawah, R. Thomas, A. Eid, E. Y. Mahmoud, and M. J. Fateel, “Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints,” Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 258–273, 2019, doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273.

T. S. Hoon, G. Narayanan, and P. Singh, “Applying fractional strategies on number line among primary school students,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 127–139, 2021, doi: 10.47836/PJSSH.29.1.07.

S. Gembong, “The scheme construction to solve the adding fractions problems using images conducted by elementary students,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042030.

M. F. Amir, M. D. K. Wardana, and D. Usfuriah, “Visual and symbolic representation forming: a Case of relational understanding on elementary student,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 2014, 2021, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4361.

J. Hwang, P. J. Riccomini, S. Y. Hwang, and S. Morano, “A systematic analysis of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties,” Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2019, doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12187.

M. F. Amir and M. D. K. Wardana, “Pengembangan domino pecahan berbasis open ended untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SD,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 178, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.1015.

I. Arnon, J. Cottrill, and E. Dubinsky, APOS Theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York, NY: SpringerLink, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6.

Posted

2024-02-15