Pain Score and Quality of Post Cesarean Section Recovery with ERACS Method
Skor Nyeri dan Kualitas Pemulihan Pasca Sectio Sesarea dengan Metode ERACS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.341Keywords:
Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Section, Pain, Quality of RecoveryAbstract
When regular childbirth is impossible owing to fetal or maternal health issues, a cesarean section must be done. The study had a post-test control group and a quasi-experimental design. Participants in this study were mothers who had a cesarean section at RSIA Kendangsari Surabaya . The sample size in this study was 70, namely 35 treatment groups and 35 control groups. The instrument uses VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and obsQor 11. Statistical test for pain obtained P value = 0.000 and for quality of recovery obtained P value = 0.000. There is a sizable distinction in pain scores carried out by the ERACS and Non ERACS methods, and there are differences in the quality of recovery between the ERACS and Non ERACS methods where the recovery quality scores are given by the method. ERACS is higher than non ERACS method.
Downloads
References
D. Ayuningtyas, R. Oktarina, N. Nyoman, and D. Sutrisnawati, “Etika kesehatan pada Persalinan Melalui Sectio Sesarea Tanpa Indikasi Medis,” J. MKMI, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2018.
F. R. 1Program Tiara Trias Tika1, Liana Sidharti2, Rani Himayani3, “Metode ERACS Sebagai Program Perioperatif Pasien Operasi Caesaragus,” J. Med. Hutama, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 2386–2391, 2022.
N. A. Nurhayati, S. Andriyani, and N. Malisa, “Relaksasi Autogenik Terhadap Penurunan Skala Nyeri Pada Ibu Post Operasi Sectio Saecarea,” J. Sk. Keperawatan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 52–61, 2015, doi: 10.35974/jsk.v1i2.87.
R. Babazade et al., “Acute postcesarean pain is associated with in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding, length of stay and post-partum depression,” J. Clin. Anesth., vol. 62, no. November, p. 109697, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109697.
E. E. Fay et al., “An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for cesarean delivery decreases hospital stay and cost,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 221, no. 4, pp. 349.e1-349.e9, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.041.
S. A. Mohammed, A. Khalis Jawad, and S. Jamal Murad, “Enhanced Recovery Program after Cesarean Section in Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital,” Kurdistan J. Appl. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 287–293, 2020, doi: 10.24017/science.2020.1.20.
R. Aliem, E. R.-I. journal of Nursing, and undefined 2018, “Effect of Intervention Guidelines on Enhanced Postpartum Recovery after Cesarean Section,” Nursingdidactics.Com, vol. 8, no. 07, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://www.nursingdidactics.com/index.php/ijnd/article/view/2869
M. Hedderson et al., “Quality ImprovEnhanced Recovery after Surgery to Change Process Measures and Reduce Opioid Use after Cesarean Delivery: Aement Initiative,” Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 511–519, 2019, doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003406.
L. Bollag et al., “ERAS perinatolog obstetricia,” 2019.
Kompas, “ERACS, Metode Persalinan yang Diklaim Kurangi Rasa Sakit pada Ibu Halaman all - Kompas.com,” 2021.
P. Sultan, N. Sharawi, L. Blake, and B. Carvalho, “Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery versus standard care studies: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes,” Int. J. Obstet. Anesth., vol. 43, pp. 72–86, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.IJOA.2020.03.003.
S. Ciechanowicz et al., “Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery,” Br. J. Anaesth., vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011.
F. Amir and S. Yulianti, “Hubungan Paritas dan Usia Terhadap Persalinan Sectio Ccaesarea di RSU Bahagia Makassar Tahun 2020,” J. Kesehat. Delima Pelamonia, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 2020, doi: 10.37337/jkdp.v4i2.179.
A. H. Pontoh, A. Kebidanan, G. Husada, R. Popok, and M. Zaitun, “Indikasi persalinan,” pp. 52–59, 2016.
J. Pan et al., “The advantage of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in acute pain management during elective cesarean delivery: A prospective randomized controlled trial,” Ther. Clin. Risk Manag., vol. 16, pp. 369–378, 2020, doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S244039.
L. Bollag et al., “Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean,” Anesth. Analg., vol. XXX, no. Xxx, pp. 1362–1377, 2021, doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005257.
Z. Q. Liu, W. J. Du, and S. L. Yao, “Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery: a challenge for anesthesiologists,” Chin. Med. J. (Engl)., vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 590–596, 2020, doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000644.
D. Metasari and B. K. Sianipar, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penurunan Nyeri Post Operasi Sectio Caesarea Di Rs. Raflessia Bengkulu,” J. Nurs. Public Heal., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.37676/jnph.v6i1.488.
H. H. Jasim, S. A. B. S. Sulaiman, A. H. Khan, and U. A. S. Rajah, “Factors affecting post caesarean pain intensity among women in the northern peninsular of Malaysia,” J. Clin. Diagnostic Res., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. IC07-IC11, 2017, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25364.10630.
A. Razan and W. Wijianto, “The Effectiveness of mobilization in improving mothers functional status after sesarean section delivery,” Acad. Physiother. Conf. Proceeding, pp. 542–546, 2021.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
