A Legal Perspective on the Content Study of the Podcast Titled "Indonesian Culture and Traditions do not Need to be Preserved"
Perspektif Yuridis Studi Konten Podcast Berjudul “Budaya dan Tradisi Indonesia Tidak Perlu Dilestarikan”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.11182Keywords:
freedom of speech, Hate Speech, Podcast, satireAbstract
The growth of digital media has expanded opportunities for freedom of expression, including podcasts that often use satire and provocative language as instruments of social criticism. This development raises legal concerns regarding the boundaries between freedom of expression and hate speech. This study examines whether a podcast entitled "Indonesian Culture and Traditions Do Not Need to Be Preserved" is a protected expression or hate speech under applicable legal provisions. Using a normative juridical method, the findings show that the podcast is more directed at criticizing culture, traditions, and cultural preservation policies rather than targeting individuals or groups. The podcast better reflects freedom of expression. Furthermore, the cumulative elements of Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2024 and Article 243 of Law Number 1 of 2023 are not met. Therefore, the podcast cannot be categorized as hate speech and remains a legally protected expression.
Downloads
References
D. Wiryany, S. Natasha, and R. Kurniawan, “Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi terhadap Perubahan Sistem Komunikasi Indonesia,” jnk, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 242–252, Nov. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v8i2.8821.
A. D. Silaban, M. Amirulloh, and L. Rafianti, “Podcast : Penyiaran Atau Layanan Konten Audio Melalui Internet (Over The Top) Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Legalitas, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 132–146, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i02.8325.
“Umairah, J.P., 2025. Podcast Dengan Pemimpin Indonesia Ideal: Suatu Aanalisis Kritis Terhadap Peran Podcast Sebagai Saluran Kebebasan Menyatakan Pendapat. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, vol 4 no (1), pp.64-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.35905/jourmics.v4i1.15505.”
“Wulan, Evi Retno. ‘Batasan Perlindungan Hukum Aktivis Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 374/Pid. Sus/2024/PT. SMG).’ PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora 4.2 (2025): 3574-3579, doi: https://al-haramjournal.id/index.php/PESHUM/article/view/8271.”
“Kusuma, Ersa. ‘Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).’ Sanskara Hukum dan HAM 1.03 (2023): 97-101.,” huk., vol. 1, no. 03, pp. 97–101, Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v1i03.63.
V. K. Kusumo, I. L. R. Junia, Y. Prianto, and T. Ruchimat, “Pengaruh UU ITE Terhadap Kebebasan Berekspresi Di Media Sosial,” Prosiding SENAPENMAS, pp. 1069–1078, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24912/psenapenmas.v0i0.15141.
S. Julianja, “Pembatasan Kebebasan Berkespresi dalam Bermedia Sosial : Evaluasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia,” Padjadjaran Law Review, vol. 6, no. 1, Apr. 2021, doi: https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/387.
A. A. N. A. Panji, M. S. Hartono, and N. K. S. Adnyani, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembuktian Secara Elektronk Dalam Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian,” Jurnal Gender dan Hak Asasi Manusia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 156–166, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v13i1.3938.
F. Kila, I. N. G. Sugiartha, and N. M. P. Ujianti, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana tanpa Sifat Melawan Hukum dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana,” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28–34, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.4.1.6027.28-34.
A. Remanu, C. Purwanto, N. Fajri, and F. Lukman, “Analisis Implikasi UU ITE Terhadap Kebebasan Berekspresi di Ruang Digital: Studi Kasus Greenpeace Indonesia,” Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 11–11, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v4i2.1984.
M. I. Siswantoro, “Hubungan Negara Dan Warga Negara Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia,” Jurnal Pendidikan DEWANTARA: Media Komunikasi, Kreasi dan Inovasi Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 122–135, Mar. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.55933/jpd.v12i1.1161.
S. Oktaviani, “Konstitusi Dan Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia: Analisis Keterbatasan Dan Perlindungan : Kebebasan Perpendapat di Indonesia,” JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 174–186, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v2i7.1864.
A. Rahmadani, M. L. Paramita, S. Haura, and F. Firman, “Regulasi Digital Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat (Studi Kasus: UU ITE Pada Platform Media Sosial Di Indonesia),” Journal of Social Contemplativa, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.61183/jsc.v2i1.75.
R. Hasibuan, “Peran Podcast dalam Mengubah Lanskap Media Tradisional,” Komunika : Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 29–35, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.70437/komunika.v2i3.1071.
C. I. D. L. Dewi, “Aspek Hukum Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi,” Jurnal Yustitia, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–34, Aug. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v15i1.698.
F. Fadlly, M. Z. Ramadhan, and F. Nur, “Konsistensi Keberadaan Asas Lex Specialis De Rogat Lex Generalis dalam KUHP Nasional,” Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1711–1718, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.63822/jtjdnd41.
W. R. Febrian, R. M. R. Faturrahman, H. S. Rahmadina, and F. Deni, “Peran Hukum Internasional Dalam Menangani Kasus Cyber Crime,” JURNAL SAHID DA’WATII, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 1–7, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.56406/jurnalsahiddawatii.v3i02.481.
Nikles Denny Ardiansyah, Bambang Panji Gunawan, and Djasim Siswono, “Penerapan UU ITE Dalam Penegakan Hukum Siber Di Indonesia Studi Kasus Pada Pasal 27 Hingga Pasal 37,” Reformasi Hukum, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 17–22, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.51804/jrhces.v7i2.16729.
S. Suparman, G. Asmara, and Z. Zunnuraeni, “Tinjauan Kritis Pasal 27 & Pasal 28 UU ITE Terhadap Kebebasan Pers,” Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i1.82.
D. T. Wahyuni and P. Febriana, “Satire Sebagai Penyampaian Kritik Sosial Sistem Kapitalisme Dalam Film Okja (Analisis Semiotika John Fiske),” Jurnal Komunikasi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 30–40, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v14i1.11845.
A. Sethiawanza, “Peran Hukum Dalam Menjaga Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Media Sosial: Antara Hak Dan Kewajiban,” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 632–638, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.62379/4cewwz38.
F. Sukma and Saparuli, “Menimbang Demokrasi Deliberatif Dalam Proses Pembentukan Hukum Yang Demokratis Di Indonesia,” IBLAM LAW REVIEW, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 140–154, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v1i3.30.
R. P. P. K. Karo, “Hate Speech: Penyimpangan terhadap UU ITE, Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Nilai-Nilai Keadilan Bermartabat,” Jurnal Lemhannas RI, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 52–65, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v10i4.370.
H. D. Hutagaol, Fahmi, and I. Harahap, “Penyelesaian Umum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang ITE, Undang-Undang HAM, Dan Undang-Undang Kebebasan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum,” Collegium Studiosum Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 635–647, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v7i2.1434.
R. A. Prasetyo, D. D. Sidarta, M. S. Borman, and S. Subekti, “Karakteristik Tindak Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Media Sosial,” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 9013–9025, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i4.14203.
“Jemadin, Silfanus, and Ando Tahamin. ‘Demokrasi deliberatif Habermas dan problematika ideologi di ruang publik digital.’ In Veritate Lux: Jurnal Ilmu Kateketik Pastoral Teologi, Pendidikan, Antropologi, dan Budaya 9.1 (2026): 15-27,doi:https://doi.org/10.63037/ivl.v9i1.183.”
F. A. Fitri, N. Muftia, I. Trilia, A. H. Munthe, and R. Ramlan, “Tinjauan Teoritis tentang Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia,” Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202–209, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i2.134.
A. A. P. Permana and S. I. Khomsah, “Penafsiran Restriktif Atas Pasal 28 Ayat (2) UU ITE,” JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN, vol. 24, no. 01, pp. 25–36, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v24i01.4603.
M. Ramadhani, “Ramadhani, Milenia. ‘Tinjauan Tindak Pidana Berbasis Teknologi dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru Tahun 2023.’ RIO LAW JURNAL 5.2 (2024): 475-484.,” RIO LAW JURNAL, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 475–484, Jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v5i2.1416.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
