Description of Motivation and Learning Outcomes of 8th Grade Students in STEM-Based Science Learning at SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Krian
Deskripsi Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas 8 dalam Pembelajaran IPA berbasis STEM di SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Krian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.9490Keywords:
STEM, Motivation, Learning Outcomes, IPA, SMPAbstract
This study aims to describe students’ learning motivation and learning outcomes after participating in STEM-based science learning. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach with 23 eighth-grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Krian as participants. The instruments consisted of a learning motivation questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale covering three aspects (intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and attitude toward STEM), and a multiple-choice learning achievement test measured against the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKM) of 63. The results showed that students’ intrinsic motivation was in the high category with a percentage of 75%, extrinsic motivation was in the moderate category with 68%, The average pretest score of 74 increased to 87 on the posttest. The mastery level rose from 87% of students achieving the KKM in the pretest to 95.7% in the posttest.. In conclusion, STEM-based science learning can increase learning motivation, fostering positive attitudes, and enhancing learning achievement.
Downloads
References
R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. April, p. 101860, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
J. Mayasari, N., & Alimuddin, Motivasi belajar siswa. 2023.
H. S. Yogi Fernando, Popi Andriani, “Pentingnya Motivasi Belajar Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” vol. 2, no, 2024, doi: 10.59246/alfihris.v2i3.843.
S. Zakia Nayem and M. S. Hossain, “Conceptual Framework for STEM Education: A Thematic Analysis in Bangladesh Perspective,” vol. 2, no, 2023, doi: 10.54536/ajmri.v2i2.1382.
S. N. A. Widiastuti, N. Supriatna, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education Research, and Innovation (ICERI 2021). Atlantis Press SARL, 2022. doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-67-1.
Nursalam. N Sulaiman., Sulaeman, S., & Latuapo, R. Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka melalui Pembelajaran
Berbasis Proyek pada Sekolah Penggerak Kelompok Bermain Terpadu Nurul Falah dan Ar-Rasyid Banda.
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 17-34. https ://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8il.3769
M. Otten, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, and M. Veldhuis, “The balance model for teaching linear equations: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0183-2.
D. R. Z. Alawiyah, R. Rustaman, “STEM education to develop students’ 21st century skills: A literature review,” vol. 9, no, 2021, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18659.
A. H. Sahin, STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. 2021.
J. T. and A. Watters, “Creativity and collaboration through STEM learning,” vol. 22, n, 2022.
J. Afriana, A. Permanasari, and A. Fitriani, “Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 202, 2016, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561.
D. R. Z. Alawiyah, R. Rustaman, “Enhancing students’ motivation through STEM-based science learning,” vol. 9, no, 2021, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18659.
I. R. S. Anwari, S. Yamada, M. Unno, “The implementation of STEM education in developing students’ creativity and critical thinking,” vol. 4, no, 2021, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v4i2.30556.
R. Wahyuni, F., “Pengaruh model problem based learning terhadap motivasi belajar IPA siswa SMP,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Sains, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31537/jp2s.v11i1.567.
R. Sages and P. Szybek, “A phenomenological study of students’ knowledge of biology in a Swedish Comprehensive School,” J. Phenomenol. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 155–187, 2000, doi: 10.1163/15691620051090960.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, 25th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
A. dkk Kusumastuti, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.
R. Ningsih, S., Wardani, “Analisis motivasi belajar siswa SMP pada pembelajaran IPA berbasis proyek,” 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.16019.
N. Sari, W. Sunarno, and S. Sarwanto, “Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah Menengah Atas,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2018, doi: 10.24832/jpnk.v3i1.591.
D. Putri, L., Kurniawan, “Analisis tingkat motivasi belajar IPA siswa pada pembelajaran berbasis proyek,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.36312/jppip.v7i2.2894.
Fitriani, D., & Rahayu, S. . Analisis hubungan motivasi belajar dengan prestasi belajar IPA siswa SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(2), 101–110. 2022
Aini, N., & Suprapto, N. Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 56–64. 2021
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
