DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v12i2.4478
The Effect of Learning Styles (Visual, Auditorial, and Kinesthetic / VAK) on Cognitive Lerning Outcomes of Elementary School Students’ Mathematics
Pengaruh Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik/VAK) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.9072Keywords:
Learning Styles, Mathematics, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study aims to determine the magnitude of the influence of learning styles on cognitive learning outcomes in mathematics of elementary school students. The method in this study is an associative type quantitative approach. Data collection uses learningstyle questionnaire sheet instruments that have passed validity and reliability tests. The population and sample were all fourth grade students of SD N 2 Tamanasri totaling 11 children. Based on the simple linear regression test, the sig value is obtained. < α, which is 0.000 < 0.050, meaning that there is a significant and positive influence between learning styles visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic / VAK on cognitive math learning outcomes. The magnitude of the influence of X on Y is shown in the coefficient of determination test of 77.3%. Overall, this study proves that learning styles have a significant influence on cognitive learning outcomes in mathematics of elementary school students. To .............. process.
Downloads
References
D. R. Rizaldi, M. Makhrus, Z. Fatimah, and C. I. S. Pineda, “The Relationship Between Learning Style and Critical Thinking Skills in Learning Kinetic Theory of Gases,” J. Sci. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72–76, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jossed.v2i2.488.
M. M. M. Zuana, S. Rumfot, F. Aziz, E. S. Handayani, and C. Lestari, “The Influence of Learning Styles (Visual, Kinesthetic and Auditory) on the Independence of Elementary Students’ Learning,” J. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 7952–7957, 2023, doi: 10.31004/joe.v5i3.1585.
N. E. Tumanggor, “Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 189, 2017, doi: 10.24114/jtp.v10i2.8731.
B. N. Falah and S. Fatimah, “Pengaruh gaya belajar dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa,” Euclid, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 25, 2019, doi: 10.33603/e.v6i1.1226.
B. S. Bloom, TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJETIVES The Classification of Educational Goals Cognitive Domain. London: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1956.
B. D. P. & M. Hernacki, “Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nayaman dan Menyenangkan,” 2007. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=6_Nx2_6T2cAC&lpg=PP1&hl=id&pg=PR16#v=onepage&q&f=false
Vivi wahyuni, “Analisis Kesalahan Pada Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Kelas Viii Model Pisa Konten Change and Relationship Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman,” M A T H L I N E J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–127, 2019, doi: 10.31943/mathline.v4i2.75.
I. Febriana, A. Ameliya, C. A. S. Napitu, M. A. Purba, and Y. K. A. Piliang, “Analisis Pengaruh Literasi Membaca Terhadap Kemampuan Matematika Di Tinjau Dari Data PISA 2022,” Kebumian dan Angkasa, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 230–235, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v2i4.122
Kemendikbudristek, “Literasi Membaca, Peringkat Indonesia di PISA 2022,” Lap. Pisa Kemendikbudristek, pp. 1–25, 2023.
S. Wahyuningsih and A. Ludfiyani, “Empowering Reading Habit of English Fiction Books to Improve English Vocabulary: Evidence from Students in an Indonesian Higher Education,” Int. J. Corner Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2024, doi: 10.54012/ijcer.v3i1.262.
Astuti et al., “Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Auditorial,” J. Pendidik. Mod., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 124–130, 2024.
S. N. Afifah and S. B. Sartika, “Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran SAVI dalam Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” Elem. J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 211–219, 2022, doi: 10.15408/elementar.v2i2.27982.
Muhammad Dasep, Risa Salsabila, and Melinda Ayu Azzahra, “Pentingnya Mengenali Gaya Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran,” J. Abdi Nusa, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 2023, doi: 10.52005/abdinusa.v3i3.104.
M. Ulum and H. Pujiastuti, “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa,” Edumatica, vol. 10, no. September, pp. 38–44, 2020.
N. Nurohmah, Y. Suchyadi, and Y. Mulyawati, “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika di SD Negeri Sukaharja 01 Kabupaten Bogor,” J. Soc. Stud. ARTS Humanit., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 67–70, 2022, doi: 10.58917/ijpe.v1i2.19.
M. Fatih, C. Alfi, U. Nahdlatul, U. Blitar, J. Timur, and K. Kunci, “Pelatihan Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka pada Komunitas Belajar Guru Kelas III Sekolah Dasar di Kota Blitar,” vol. 2, no. 379, pp. 29–35, 2024, doi: 10.69688/aremben.v2i1.70.
Sugiyono, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2020.
A. Soesana et al., Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2023.
F. Yusup, “UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF,” J. Tarb. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2018, doi: 10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884.
i P. A. A. Payadnya and I. G. A. N. T. Jayantika, Panduan Penelitian Eksperimen Beserta Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS, vol. 11, no. 1. Sleman, Yogyakarta: PENERBIT DEEPUBLISH (Grup Penerbitan CV BUDI UTAMA), 2018. [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
B. Prasteyo and L. M. Jannah, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Ketiga. Kabupaten Lumajang, Jawa Timur.: Press WIDYAGAMA, 2014.
S. Ismail, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek ‘Project Based Learning’ Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 35 Halmahera Selatan Pada Konsep Gerak Lurus”,” J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 256–269, 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6466594.
W. Widana and P. L. Muliani, Buku Uji Persyaratan Analisis. Lumajang, Jawa Timur: Klik Media, 2020.
I. M. Rusmana and D. S. Wulandari, “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Dan Kecerdasan Logika Matematika Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika,” J. Lebesgue J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat. Mat. dan Stat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2020, doi: 10.46306/lb.v1i2.18.
D. Oktaviana et al., “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V Sd Negeri 068008,” J. Ilm. Aquinas, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/Aquinas/article/view/3327
D. Hafizha, R. Ananda, and I. Aprinawati, “Analisis Pemahaman Guru Terhadap Gaya Belajar Siswa Di Sdn 020 Ridan Permai,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2022, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v8n1.p25-33.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
