DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15il.pp631-645
MASTER Learning Model: Motivating, Acquiring, Searching, Triggering, Exhibiting, and Reflecting toward Students' Mathematical Reasoning
Model Pembelajaran MASTER: Motivating, Acquiring, Searching, Triggering, Exhibiting, Reflecting terhadap Penalaran Matematis Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.8735Keywords:
MASTER learning model, mathematical reasoning, primary studentsAbstract
MASTER Learning Model: Motivating, Acquiring, Searching, Triggering, Exhibiting, Reflecting toward Students Mathematical Reasoning. Methods: This study is classified as a quasi-experiment involving participants engaging fifth-grade students in two Sidoarjo primary schools. The study design was a pre-test, post-test-only control group involving the experiment and control
classes. The experiment class implemented the MASTER learning model, and the control class implemented conventional learning. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique, with one class in one primary school in Sidoarjo as the experimental class and one primary school in Sidoarjo as the control class. The study instrument used a mathematical reasoning test to measure three components of mathematical reasoning: analysis, generalization, and justification Data analysis used descriptive and inferential. Descriptive analysis includes the calculation of mean, standard deviation, and effect size. Meanwhile, inferential analysis uses an independent t-test with two prerequisite tests: normality and homogeneity.
Downloads
References
A. Hjelte, M. Schindler, and P. Nilsson, “Kinds of mathematical reasoning addressed in empirical research in mathematics education: A systematic review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10100289.
J. Cai and R. Leikin, “Affect in mathematical problem posing: Conceptualization, advances, and future directions for research,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 287–301, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10649-020-10008-x.
I. Kliziene, A. Paskovske, G. Cizauskas, A. Augustiniene, B. Simonaitiene, and R. Kubiliunas, “The impact of achievements in mathematics on cognitive ability in primary school,” Brain Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060736.
S. Herbert, “Overcoming challenges in assessing mathematical reasoning,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 17–30, 2021, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n8.2.
O. Buchbinder and S. Mccrone, “Guiding principles for teaching mathematics via reasoning and proving,” he 12th Congr. Eur. Soc. Res. Math. Educ. (CERME 12), Bozen-Bolzano, Italy., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03746878
S. Kaitera and S. Harmoinen, “Developing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary school by using visual representations on heuristics,” Lumat, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 111–146, 2022, doi: 10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696.
A. L. Palinussa, J. S. Molle, and M. Gaspersz, “Realistic mathematics education: Mathematical reasoning and communication skills in rural contexts,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 522–534, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20640.
K. Melhuish, E. Thanheiser, and L. Guyot, Mathematical reasoning forms : Justification and generalization, no. 0123456789. Springer Netherlands, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4.
R. Hidayat, W. Wahyudin, J. Jailani, and B. R. Setiadi, “Improving elementary students’ mathematical reasoning abilities through sociohumanistic-based learning,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1457–1469, 2020, doi: 10.17478/jegys.750033.
N. Klang, N. Karlsson, W. Kilborn, P. Eriksson, and M. Karlberg, “Mathematical problem-solving through cooperative learning—the importance of peer acceptance and friendships,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. August, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.710296.
P. Yuanita, H. Zulnaidi, and E. Zakaria, “The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–20, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204847.
N. Supriadi, W. Jamaluddin Z, and S. Suherman, “The role of learning anxiety and mathematical reasoning as predictor of promoting learning motivation: The mediating role of mathematical problem solving,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 52, no. March, p. 101497, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101497.
R. W. Putra, E. Aprilyanti, R. N. Dewi, and F. I. Suri, “Model pembelajaran MASTER (mind, acquire, search out, trigger, exhibit, reflect): Bagaimana pengaruhnya terhadap penalaran dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik,” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 58–67, 2024.
I. Djakaria, F. Harun, and S. W. D. Pomalato, “The influence of problem-solving learning model and student learning motivation on mathematical reasoning ability,” J. Asian Multicult. Res. Educ. Study, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.47616/jamres.v2i1.8 The.
C. Kastira and I. Irwan, “The effect of master model to students understanding of mathematical concepts,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2023, doi: 10.24036/ijmurhica.v6i1.11.
H. Purnamawati, A. Murni, and S. Saragih, “Development of learning tools by applying the MASTER plan technique based on a scientific approach to improve student learning outcomes on number pattern material,” Math. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 126–136, 2020, doi: 10.22219/mej.v4i2.12660.
S. Suherman, A. Zafirah, F. A. Agusti, R. P. Sandra, Engkizar, and Efendi, “Encouraging students’ active learning activities through the implementation of MASTER learning model based on mind mapping techniques,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1940, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012094.
M. Sabirin, A. Hidayatullah, R. A. Saputri, M. F. Atsnan, and M. L. Nareki, “MASTER (motivating, acquiring, searching, triggering, exhibiting, reflecting) learning model in terms of literacy ability and students’ mathematics learning motivation,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v9i1.48481.
S. Suparti and N. Netriwati, “The MASTER (motivating, acquiring, searching, triggering, exhibiting, reflecting) learning model based on edutainment and motivation: Impact and interaction on mathematical connections skills,” J. Adv. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2021, doi: 10.58524/jasme.v1i1.5.
L. Nurhudaeni, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran master berbantuan mind mapping terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa sma negeri 1 sugihwaras,” J. Pendidik. Madrasah, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2022, doi: 10.14421/jpm.2022.72.08.
S. M. Ani, H. K. Oktavia, P. N. Sri, and P. Agus, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran master terhadap literasi matematis ditinjau dari perbedaan gender,” J. Math. Educ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2019, doi: 10.32665/james.v2i2.94.
M. T. Maharani, P. K. Dewi, I. G. Nyoman, and Y. Hartawan, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran MASTER (motivating, acquiring, searching, triggering, exhibiting, and reflecting) berbantuan geogebra terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa kelas VII di smp negeri 8 singaraja,” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jjpm.v14i2.65521 Pengaruh.
N. U. Ardiani, A. Asrori, and S. P. Nasution, “Analisis kemampuan koneksi matematis terhadap model pembelajaran MASTER (motivating, acquiring, searching, triggering, exhibiting, reflecting), dan self efficacy,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2021, doi: 10.21580/square.2021.3.2.9324.
N. Asrawati and U. K. Sulaiman, “Comparison of student learning outcomes through the application of accelerated learning method with conventional methods in mathematics learning,” Alauddin J. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/ajme
R. A. Windari and M. F. Amir, “Realistic mathematics education for logical reasoning of primary students,” J. Math Educ. Nusant., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/matematika
E. S. Magfirotin and M. F. Amir, “Elementary school students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge in solving fraction problems,” J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 109–122, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano.
M. S. A. Devi and M. F. Amir, “Analisis kesalahan konseptual dan prosedural siswa sekolah dasar dalam menggeneralisasi pola bilangan,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 1336, 2021, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3713.
S. N. W. Utami and M. F. Amir, “Primary school student’s mathematical literacy in solving multiple-solution,” Pendidik. Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 165–178, 2023, doi: 10.25273/pe.v13i2.18505.
A. A. L. Mubarokah and M. F. Amir, “Primary students’ errors in solving mathematical literacy problems based on newman analysis,” Math. Educ. J., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 217–230, 2024, doi: 10.22342/jpm.v18i2.pp217-230.
N. I. Romadhon, M. F. Amir, and M. D. K. Wardana, “Assessing students’ mathematical reasoning in problem-based learning: A gender perspective,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3763–3774, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i6.29580.
U. Wathne and C. Brodahl, “Engaging mathematical reasoning-and-proving: A task, a method, and a taxonomy,” J. Int. Soc. Teach. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 6–17, 2019.
L. Nurmasari, Budiyono, J. Nurkamto, and M. Ramli, “Realistic mathematics engineering for improving elementary school students’ mathematical literacy,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2024, doi: 10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp1-26.
J. W. Creswell and T. C. Guetterman, Educational research, planning, conducting,and evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research, Sixth. New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc., 2019.
R. Colin and M. J. Nicholl, Accelereted learning for the 21st century. 2002.
E. Loong, C. Vale, W. Widjaja, S. Herbert, L. Bragg, and A. Davidson, “Developing a rubric for assessing mathematical reasoning : A design-based research study in primary classrooms,” Mak. waves, Open. spaces (Proceedings 41st Annu. Conf. Math. Educ. Res. Gr. Australas., pp. 503–510, 2018.
D. Lestari and S. Sardin, “Efektifitas model pembelajaran knisley terhadap penalaran matematis siswa,” J. Akad. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. d, pp. 49–52, 2020, doi: 10.55340/japm.v6i1.195.
E. Aprilyanti, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran MASTER (mind, acquire, search out, trigger, exhibit,reflect) terhadap penalaran dan pemahaman konsep peserta didik,” Αγαη, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/33988
Suharni, Pengaruh model pembelajaran MASTER (motivating, aqcuiring, searching, triggering, exhibiting, and reflecting) terhadap representasi matematis ditinjau dari motivasi belajar peserta didik, vol. 75, no. 17. 2021.
P. W. Thompson, “Constructivism in mathematics education bt - Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education,” S. Lerman, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 127–134. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_31.
L. P. Steffe and C. Ulrich, “Constructivist teaching experiment bt - Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education,” S. Lerman, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 134–141. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_32.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
