DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v12i2.4517
Analysis The Cognitive Abilities Of Elementary School Students Based On Learning Styles
Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.8682Keywords:
Cognitive, Learning styles, form of substanceAbstract
This study aims to analyse the cognitive abilities of elementary school students based on their learning styles in science subjects, especially on the material of changes in the form of substances. This research uses a qualitative phenomenological approach, by conducting direct observations and interviews with 4 fourth grade students at MINU Sumokali who are classified into three learning styles, namely visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The data collection methods used include written tests, interviews, and documentation, with cognitive abilities assessed through six indicators: remembering, understanding, applying, analysing, evaluating, and creating. The results showed that students with auditory learning style (ZDN3) achieved the highest score, categorised as excellent, while students with visual learning style (FTR1) also scored excellent, and students with visual (HFZ2) and kinesthetic (AGS4) learning styles were categorised as good. Overall, the findings suggest that the majority of students demonstrated good cognitive ability.
Downloads
References
N. Sari and S. B. Sartika, “Korelasi Gaya Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa Smp,” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v11i1.114.
J. W. Keefe, “Assessment of Learning Style Variables: The NASSP Task Force Model,” Theory Pract., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 138–144, 1985, doi: 10.1080/00405848509543162.
N. Nasution, “Hakikat Gaya Belajar Auditori dalam Pandangan Filsafat,” At_Tazakki, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 255–270, 2022.
S. Messick, “The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 59–74, 1984, doi: 10.1080/00461528409529283.
Sari and Wulandari, “Analisis kemampuan kognitif dalam pembelajan IPA SMP,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Sains Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2020.
D. F. Wardhani and S. B. Sartika, “The Profile of Affective Abilities at Elementary School Students in Natural Science Learning Based on Learning Styles,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2024, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v5i1.898.
S. N. dan I. D. P. Nurbaeti, “Hubungan Gaya Belajar Dengan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia di,” e-Jurnal Mitra Sains, vol. Volume 3 N, no. 2302–2027, pp. 24–33, 2017.
A. Talib, “Analisis Level Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP,” Semin. Nas. Has. Penelit. 2021, pp. 209–223, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnaslemlit/article/view/25243
D. F. Une, E. Hulukati, Y. Ismail, A. W. Abdullah, and K. Usman, “Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar Dengan Kemampuan Kognitif Matematika Pada Materi Lingkaran di SMP Negeri 2 Limboto,” Res. Math. Nat. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2022, doi: 10.55657/rmns.v1i1.38.
M. Riny and S. Safrul, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran STAD Menggunakan Powerpoint Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8666–8674, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3885.
L. W. Anderson et al., “TAKSONOMI ANDERSON (et.al.): Revisi atas Taksonomi Bloom (et.al.),” p. 323, 2023.
Siregar et al., Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran, no. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. 2024.
M. Berlian, R. Deswanti, A. Syafaren, and R. A. Putri, “Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA di SMP Negeri 02 Rumbio Jaya,” Bedelau J. Educ. Learn., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–93, 2022.
N. Noor Hayati, W. Shokib Rondil, and A. Darmuki, “Analisis Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 Pada Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 09, pp. 1–23, 2024.
Nurussaniah and Sari, “Analisis kemampuan kognitif ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa pada pelajaran IPA,” J. Pendidik. Inform. dan Sains, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159–165, 2020, doi: 10.31571/saintek.v9i2.2270.
N. L. Rahmah, “Analisis gaya belajar siswa pada pembelajaran IPA kelas IV SD,” vol. X, no. X, pp. 9–14, 2022.
P. D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Ke 3. Bandung, 2023.
S. Nuralan, K. M. Ummah, and Haslinda, “Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa Berprestasi di SD Negeri 5 Tolitoli,” Pendek. J. Pengemb. Pendidik. danPembelajaran Sekol. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 5, 2022.
E. Retnowati and N. Nugraheni, “Analisis Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2024, doi: 10.30595/jrpd.v5i1.16151.
Yunianto, Andri, and Aini, “Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Matematis Peserta Didik Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Vak (Visual, Auditory, Kinestetik),” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1010–1027, 2023, doi: 10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2054.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
