POGIL Learning Model: Does it affect Science Literacy in the Knowledge Aspect?
Model Pembelajaran POGIL: Apakah berpengaruh terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Aspek Pengetahuan?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.7963Keywords:
Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), Science Literacy, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of using the POGIL learning model on science literacy skills in the knowledge aspect of elementary school students, especially in IPAS subjects. The research method used is quantitative with the type of quasi-experiment and the research design is nonequivalent control group design. This research was conducted at SD Muhammadiyah 1 Taman, Sidoarjo with research subjects of grade IV students who were divided into experimental and control groups. Based on the results of the t-test shows that the value of Sig. (2 tailed) value of 0.000 which means there is a difference in the average ability of science literacy aspects of knowledge in experimental and control classes.
Downloads
References
V. Sukmayadi and A. H. Yahya, “Indonesian education landscape and the 21st century challenges,” Journal of Social Studies Education Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 219–234, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218538/
N. K. E. Muliastrini, “New literacy sebagai upaya peningkatan mutu pendidikan sekolah dasar di abad 21,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 115–125, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpdi.v4i1.3114.
N. Nisrina, A. W. Jufri, and G. Gunawan, “Pengembangan LKPD berbasis blended learning untuk meningkatkan literasi sains peserta didik,” Jurnal Pijar Mipa, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 192–199, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1880.
D. Saryono, G. A. Ibrahim, L. Muliastuti, and Q. S. Akbari, Materi pendukung literasi baca tulis: Gerakan Literasi Nasional. 2017.
L. D. Anggreni, I. N. Jampel, and K. S. Diputra, “Pengaruh model project based learning berbantuan penilaian portofolio terhadap literasi sains,” Mimbar Ilmu, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 41, 2020, doi: 10.23887/mi.v25i1.24475.
Y. Wahyu, I. W. Suastra, I. W. Sadia, and N. K. Suarni, “The effectiveness of mobile augmented reality assisted STEM-based learning on scientific literacy and students’ achievement,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 343–356, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13324a.
H. Lestari, “Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Dengan Blog,” NATURALISTIC : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 2b, pp. 597–604, 2020, doi: 10.35568/naturalistic.v4i2b.769.
OECD, PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. 2019.
A. Widayoko, E. Latifah, and L. Yuliati, “Peningkatan kompetensi literasi saintifik siswa SMA dengan bahan ajar terintegrasi STEM pada materi impuls dan momentum,” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1463–1467, 2018, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v3i11.1176.
T. Nofiana, Mufidah & Julianto, “Upaya peningkatan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis keunggulan lokal,” Jurnal Tadris Pendidikan Biologi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 2018, doi: 10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2876.
I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, and M. Von Davier, “TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks,” 2021.
S. Hadi and Novaliyosi, “TIMSS Indonesia (Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study),” Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, 2019.
H. Fuadi, A. Z. Robbia, J. Jamaluddin, and A. W. Jufri, “Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122.
I. K. Suparya, I Wayan Suastra, and I. B. Putu Arnyana, “Rendahnya Literasi Sains: Faktor Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusinya,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 153–166, 2022, doi: 10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.580.
M. J. Barthlow, “The effectiveness of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry learning,” p. 319, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/reader/58824070
D. M. Hanson, Instructor ’ s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning by With Contributions from other POGIL project personnel : Instructor ’ s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. 2013.
R. S. Moog and J. N. Spencer, Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL), vol. 46, no. 08. 2009. doi: 10.5860/choice.46-4453.
E. P. Douglas and C. C. Chiu, “Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Engineering,” Adv Eng Educ, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2013.
D. M. Hanson, “Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities,” no. January 2007, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238073200_Designing_Process-Oriented_Guided-Inquiry_Activities
E. K. Devi, E. Sulistri, and H. Rosdianto, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Archimedes,” Konstan - Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 78–88, 2019, doi: 10.20414/konstan.v4i2.42.
U. Aiman, S. Hasyda, and Uslan, “The influence of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model assisted by realia media to improve scientific literacy and critical thinking skill of primary school students,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1635–1647, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1635.
Yennita, F. Astriawati, and D. Jumiarni, “Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL): Its Effectiveness in Increasing Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills in Plant Physiology Course,” BIOEDUSCIENCE, vol. 8, no. 1, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.22236/jbes/13008.
U. Apriliya Yolanda, M. Sari, P. Studi Tadris Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, and F. Tarbiyah Dan Tadris Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, “Analysis Of The Process Oriented Guide-Inquiry Learning Model On Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities Analisis Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guide-Inquiry Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa,” 2024. [Online]. Available: http://journal.al-matani.com/index.php/jkip/index
Y. Nasir, “Pengaruh Model Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Negeri 1 Malunda,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/15738
A. Yani and A. N. Hikmah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning terhadap Literasi Sains dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif IPA Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah,” vol. 15, pp. 87–93, 2023, doi: 10.25134/quagga.v15i1.5738.Received.
G. N. Aprilia, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran POGIL terhadap hasil belajar IPA pada siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-penelitian-pgsd/article/view/28664
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV., 2019.
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV., 2014.
Prof. Dr. Suharsimi Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
Dr. Kadir M.Pd., Statistika terapan : konsep, contoh dan analisis data dengan program SPSS/Lisrel dalam penelitian . Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
D. Ardianto, B. Rubini, U. Pakuan, and J. Barat, “Literasi sains dan aktivitas siswa pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu tipe shared,” 2016, doi: 10.15294/usej.v5i1.9650.
R. I. Arends, Learning to teach. [Online]. Available: https://hasanahummi.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/connect-learn-succeed-richard-arends-learning-to-teach-mcgraw-hill-2012.pdf
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
