Learning Model Based on Child Friendly School Concept at Mi Tahdzibul Fuad Socorejo Jenu Tuban
Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Konsep Sekolah Ramah Anak di Mi Tahdzibul Fuad Socorejo Jenu Tuban
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.5309Keywords:
learning model, child friendly schoolAbstract
This study aims to describe the learning model based on the concept of child-friendly school at MI Tahdzibul Fuad Socorejo Jenu Tuban. The research method used used a qualitative approach of case study design. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis techniques using Milles and Hubermen's theory which consists of Data Reduction, Data Presentation, Conclusion Drawing. The validity test used is source triangulation and method triangulation. The results showed that MI Tahdzibul Fuad Socorejo Jenu Tuban has fulfilled the principles of child-friendly schools, namely nondiscrimination, the best interests of children, survival and development of children, respect for children's views, and good school management. MI Tahdzibul Fuad Socorejo Jenu uses PAIKEM learning with three learning models, namely active learning models, problem-based learning models and project-based learning models.
Downloads
References
N. Rohmawati and E. Hangestiningsih, “Kajian program sekolah ramah anak dalam pembentukan karakter di sekolah dasar,” Pros. Semin. Nas. PGSD, no. 35, pp. 225–229, 2019.
H. Salsabila, K. Nurnazhiifa, L. Sati, and H. Windayana, “Peran Layanan Khusus Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Mencegah dan Menangani Kasus Bullying di Sekolah,” Aulad J. Early Child., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 290–298, 2022, doi: 10.31004/aulad.v4i3.228.
R. Paradiaz and E. Soponyono, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Pelecehan Seksual,” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2022, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v4i1.61-72.
L. J. Pemikiran, P. Pendidikan, and D. Issn, “Pembelajaran sd/mi berbasis …..(syahru dan yayuk) 87,” vol. 2, pp. 87–101, 2018.
S. Sania, “Kebijakan Permendiknas Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pedidikan Inklusi,” PRODU Prokurasi Edukasi J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2019, doi: 10.15548/p-prokurasi.v1i1.3325.
A. Lestari, F. Setiawan, and E. Agustin, “Manajemen Pendidikan Inklusi di Sekolah Dasar,” Arzusin, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 602–610, 2022, doi: 10.58578/arzusin.v2i6.703.
A. Fahmi, “Implementasi Program Sekolah Ramah Anak Dalam Proses Pembelajaran,” J. Vision. Penelit. dan Pengemb. dibidang Adm. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 33, 2021, doi: 10.33394/vis.v6i1.4086.
A. Alfina and R. N. Anwar, “Manajemen Sekolah Ramah Anak Paud Inklusi,” AL-TANZIM J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–47, 2020, doi: 10.33650/al-tanzim.v4i1.975.
L. R. Pratama, “Manajemen Pendidikan Karakter PAUD,” Jambura Early Child. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 182–194, 2022, doi: 10.37411/jecej.v4i2.1125.
I. Rindaningsih, W. D. Hastuti, and Y. Findawati, “Desain Lingkungan Belajar yang Menyenangkan Berbasis Flipped Classroom di Sekolah Dasar,” Proc. ICECRS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2019, doi: 10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2452.
R. Hulbat, “Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Konsep Sekolah RAMAH ANAK (Studi Kasus pada SD Negeri Antasari 1 Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara),” J. Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Kedakwahan, vol. 15, no. 29, pp. 19–30, 2022, doi: 10.58900/jiipk.v15i29.7.
Kementerian PPPA, “Panduan Sekolah Ramah Anak Deputi Tumbuh Kembang Anak,” Kementeri. Peberdayaan Peremp. Dan Perlindungan Anak, p. 42, 2015.
I. N. Inayati and R. Trianingsih, “Relevansi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Di Sd/Mi Dengan Konsep Madrasah/Sekolah Ramah Anak,” Tarbiyatuna Kaji. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 139, 2019, doi: 10.29062/tarbiyatuna.v3i2.264.
H. Naufal, “Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme pada Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa di Era Merdeka Belajar,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 143–152, 2021.
S. Hadi, M. Program, D. Manajemen, P. Islam, and U. Malang, “Model Pengembangan Mutu Di Lembaga Pendidikan,” PENSA J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Sos., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 321–347, 2020.
S. A. Pohan and F. Dafit, “Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1191–1197, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.898.
L. N. Sihombing, R. P. Napitupulu, and J. Simorangkir, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Paikem Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa,” J. Ilm. Aquinas, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2021, doi: 10.54367/aquinas.v4i2.1228.
D. E. C. Na and C. Hipertensiva, “Strategi Pembelajaran Atif Dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia,” vol. 7, pp. 175–184.
M. Uliyandari, Emilia Candrawati, Anna Ayu Herawati, and Nurlia Latipah, “Problem-Based Learning To Improve Concept Understanding and Critical Thinking Ability of Science Education Undergraduate Students,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2021, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v2i1.56.
P. D. Anggraini and S. S. Wulandari, “Analisis Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Dalam Peningkatan Keaktifan Siswa,” J. Pendidik. Adm. Perkantoran, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 292–299, 2020, doi: 10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p292-299.
A. N. Hasudungan, “Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Sebuah Tinjauan,” J. Din., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 112–126, 2022, doi: 10.18326/dinamika.v3i2.112-126.
J. W. Wicaksono, “Strategi Guru Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar,” vol. 3, no. c, pp. 81–94, 2023, doi: 10.37680/basica.v3i1.3676.
J. Pengabdian and K. Masyarakat, “Sosialisasi Pencegahan Perilaku Bullying Melalui Edukasi Pendidikan Karakter Dan Pelibatan Orang Tua Lu’luin,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2023.
Y. Listiawati et al., “Implementasi Program Sekolah Ramah Anak,” vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 170–183, 2022.
H. Hisbollah, B. Budiyanto, and M. Mudjito, “Model Pengelolaan Kelas Di Sekolah Dasar Inklusi Kabupaten Bojonegoro,” J. Spec. Educ. Need, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 010–020, 2022.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
