Preprint has been published in a journal as an article
Preprint / Version 1

Productivity Analysis Using the Cobb-Douglas Function Based on Effective Working Hours


Analisa Produktivitas Menggunakan Fungsi Cobb-Douglas Berdasarkan Jam Kerja Efektif

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.4598

Keywords:

Productivity, Effective Working Hours, Cobb-Douglas, Efficiency Index

Abstract

The company's problem is that the amount of shoe production output produced fluctuates throughout the year, The data required is the amount of production per month and the amount of effective working time in each month. This research aims to compare the productivity of the amount of effective working time in the production department in 2021 and 2022. The productivity measurement method is based on the Cobb-Douglas production function approach, so that we can know the extent of the company's efficiency and effectiveness. These results can be used as consideration in maintaining and increasing productivity. Productivity measurement is carried out using the Cobb-Douglas function approach. This research shows that the level of productivity in 2022 is higher than in 2021 with the efficiency index values in 2021 and 2022 being 0.9499104 and 1.0599527. This means that the use of working hours increased by 11.58%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Ramayanti, G. Sastraguntara, dan S. Supriyadi, “Analisis Produktivitas dengan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) di Lantai Produksi Perusahaan Botol Minuman,” Jurnal INTECH Teknik Industri Universitas Serang Raya, vol. 6, no. 1, hlm. 31–38, Jun 2020, doi: 10.30656/intech.v6i1.2275.

J. Hardi dkk., “Human Resource Scorecard (HRSC) and Objective Matrix as Performance Measurement and Performance Booster Method to Optimize Production Performance,” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, vol. 6, no. 6, hlm. 173, Des 2019, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1200.

R. Setiowati, “ANALISIS PENGUKURAN PRODUKTIVITAS DEPARTEMEN PRODUKSI DENGAN METODE OBJECTIVE MATRIX (OMAX) PADA CV. JAYA MANDIRI,” 2017.

H. C. Wahyuni dan S. Setiawan, “Implementasi Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) Untuk Pengukuran Produktivitas Pada PT.ABC,” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optimization and Manufacturing System Engineering), vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 17–21, Jun 2017, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v1i1.702.

E. Z. Afianti, K. Satriawan, W. Gede, dan S. Yoga, “Analisis Produktivitas Produksi PT. Bapak Bakery Badung Bali Production Productivity Analysis Pt. Bapak Bakery Badung Bali,” 2019.

I. Ristumadin, “ANALISA PRODUKTIVITAS DAN EFISIENSI KERJA DENGAN LINE BALANCING PADA AREA LEAD CONNECTION DI PTA,” vol. IX, hlm. 300–310, 2015.

Jono, “ANALISIS Produktivitas Pabrik Spiritus Menggunakan Fungsi Produksi Cobb-Douglas (Studi Kasus Di PT. XYZ Yogyakarta),” Spektrum Industri, vol. 14, no. 2, hlm. 198–207, 2016.

A. Gunawan, T. Industri, F. Teknik, dan U. Singaperbangsa Karawang, “Analisis Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja dengan Metode Marvin E. Mundel pada CV. Mulia Tata Sejahtera,” Serambi Engineering, vol. VI, no. 3, 2021.

N. A. Ningsih, D. Rahmaniyah, dan D. Astuti, “Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Produksi Loom dengan Metode OMAX Scoring System pada Unit Weaving PT. Dan Liris,” 2022.

I. Hanif, I. Maflahah, dan M. Fahkry, “ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS ROTI PIA PADA IRT PIA LATIEF KEDIRI,” AGROINTEK, vol. 13, no. 2, hlm. 143–154, Agu 2019, doi: 10.21107/agrointek.v13i2.5291.

M. Yahya, A. Habibillah, dan H. C. Wahyuni, “Seminar Nasional & Call Paper Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi (SENASAINS 5 th,” 2022.

B. N. Laratiwi, T. Mulyanto, dan M. Yamin, “ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS PRODUKSI GULA AREN DAN GULA KELAPA DI PT X MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTI FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT MODEL (MFPMM),” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Rekayasa, vol. 26, no. 1, hlm. 46–55, 2021, doi: 10.35760/tr.2021.v26i1.3531.

R. Prabowo dan R. Aditia, “ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE POSPAC DAN PERFORMANCE PRISM SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA (Studi Kasus: Industri Baja Tulangan di PT. X Surabaya),” Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.26593/jrsi.v9i1.3362.11-20.

E. Fradinata dan D. Asmadi, “Analisis Produktivitas Parsial Menggunakan Metode POSPAC pada CV Tirta Bening Abadi,” Jurnal Serambi Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, hlm. 7446–7456, 2023.

A. Muftiadi dan D. Fordian, “PENERAPAN MODEL COBB-DOUGLAS UNTUK ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS PDAM DAN POTENSI UNIVERSAL AKSES DI INDONESIA,” AdBispreneur, vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 145, Des 2020, doi: 10.24198/adbispreneur.v5i2.26777.

S. Imran dan R. Indriani, Buku Ajar Ekonomi Produksi Pertanian . Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing, 2022.

Y. Fanani, H. C. Suroso, S. Arifin, M. Aqshal, dan B. Ilman, “Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Industri Berkelanjutan III (SENASTITAN III) Surabaya,” 2023.

S. R. Prastyo dan Lukmandono, “Analisa Produktivitas Berdasarkan Pendekatan Metode American Productivity Center (APC) dan Marvin E Mundel di CV. Nipson Industrial Coating,” Jurnal SENOPATI, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 11–21, 2019.

M. R. Maulana dan Lukmandono, “Analisa Produktivitas dengan Metode American Productivity Center (APC) dan Marvin E. Mundel (Studi Kasus: UD. Sido Lancar),” Seminar Nasional Teknologi Industri Berkelanjutan I (SENASTITAN I) , hlm. 202–207, 2021.

P. H. RS, “Implementasi Teori Produksi Model”Cobb-Douglas Function” Untuk Umkm Makanan Siap Saji Di Kota Medan,” Proceding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan, vol. 2, no. 1, hlm. 1083–1095, 2021.

H. Z. K. Putra dan H. C. Wahyuni, “Analysis of Labor Productivity Factors in the Inspection Division (Case Study at PT. XYZ),” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optimization and Manufacturing System Engineering), vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 10–17, Mar 2021, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v3i1.1262.

A. salam, “Analisis Pengaruh Pembiayaan Mikro Syariah terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM),” Jurnal Insitusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan Juripol, vol. 2, 2019.

F. Nurprihatin dan H. Tannady, “PENGUKURAN PRODUKTIVITAS MENGGUNAKAN FUNGSI COBB-DOUGLAS BERDASARKAN JAM KERJA EFEKTIF,” 2017.

M. K. Yudistira dan A. F. Santoso, “Information Technology Capital Expenditure Analysis Using Cobb Douglas Production Function at PT. XL Axiata Tbk,” 2023.

E. Safitri, S. Basriati, dan K. Indah Sari, “PENGARUH LUAS LAHAN DAN PRODUKTIVITAS TERHADAP HASIL PRODUKSI KELAPA SAWIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE COBB DOUGLASS (STUDI KASUS: PTPN V, PEKANBARU),” MAP Journal, hlm. 56–65, 2020.

G. Candra Firmansyah dan H. Catur Wahyuni, “PENGUKURAN KINERJA PRODUKTIVITAS DIMASA PANDEMI COVID-19 MENGGUNAKAN METODE COBB DOUGLAS DI PT. KCS,” Pengukuran Kinerja Produktivitas | GaIih | Hana, 2021.

F. D. Fadude, H. N. Tawas, J. G. Poluan, dan P. Kepemimpinan…, “PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN, BUDAYA ORGANISASI, DAN KOMPETENSI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT. BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI CABANG BITUNG THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND COMPETENCE ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN PT. BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI BRANCH BITUNG,” 2019.

E. Suhesti dan A. Mushawwanah, “ELASTISITAS PRODUKSI DAN EFISIENSI PENGGUNAAN FAKTOR PRODUKSI BUNGA MELATI DI DESA TALKADANG KECAMATAN SITUBONDO KABUPATEN SITUBONDO Production Elasticity and Efficiency of Use of Jasmine Flower Production Factors In Talkadang Village, Situbondo District, Situbondo Regency,” vol. 5, no. 1, 2022.

D. P. Ningrum, L. Abdurrahman, dan A. F. Santoso, “Analisis Performansi Biaya Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Fungsi Produksi Cobb Douglas Pada PT. Telkom Indonesia,” e-Proceeding of Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, hlm. 1365–1372, 2023.

Posted

2024-05-14