How Students' Proportional Reasoning in The Worked Example Strategy
Bagaimana Penalaran Proporsional Siswa dalam Strategi Worked Example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.4242Keywords:
Proportional Reasoning, Worked ExampleAbstract
Proportional reasoning is a term that indicates reasoning in a system of two variables between which there is a linear functional relationship leading to conclusions about situations or phenomena that can be characterized by a constant ratio. The worked example strategy explains the steps and solution of the problem explicitly. This study aims to analyze the worked example strategy on proportional reasoning. This research uses explanatory sequential mix methods. This research was conducted in the 5th grade of SD Muhammadiyah 1 Krembung. Sampling in this study used a random sampling technique, where the researcher took several children randomly to be interviewed. The results of this study showed that there was a significant difference from the pretest and posttest results. This study obtained an n-gain value of 0.83 so that it can be stated that the worked example strategy has an effect on students' proportional reasoning.
Downloads
References
M. Izzatin, “Proportional reasoning in mathematics : what and how is the process ?,” vol. 619, no. Iciep 2020, pp. 115–119, 2021.
E. Vanluydt, A. Supply, L. Verschaffel, and W. Van Dooren, “Early childhood research quarterly the importance of specific mathematical language for early proportional reasoning,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 55, pp. 193–200, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.003.
Misnasanti, R. W. Utami, and F. R. Suwanto, “Problem based learning to improve proportional reasoning of students in mathematics learning,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017. doi: 10.1063/1.4995129.
D. Ben-Cham, J. T. Fey, W. M. Fitzgerald, C. Benedetto, and J. Miller, “Proportional reasoning among 7th grade students with different curricular experiences,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 247–273, 1998, doi: 10.1023/A.
Kemendikbudristek BSKAP, Salinan keputusan kepala badan standar, kurikulum, dan asesmen pendidikan, kementerian pendidikan, kebudayaan, riset, dan teknologi nomor 008/H/KR/2022 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini jenjang pendidikan dasar, no. 021. 2022.
M. S. Pelen, P. D. Artut, and P. D. Seventh, “Seventh grade students ’ problem solving success rates on proportional reasoning problems seventh grade students ’ problem solving success rates on proportional reasoning problems,” Int. J. Res. Educ. angd Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2016.
A. Prayitno, A. Rossa, and F. D. Widayanti, “Level penalaran proporsional siswa dalam memecahkan missing value problem,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 2019, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.19728.
E. Vanluydt, “The importance of specific mathematical language for early proportional reasoning,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 55, pp. 193–200, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.003.
F. Mardika and A. Mahmudi, “An analysis of proportional reasoning ability of junior high school students,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2021, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v8i1.14995.
M. Irfan, C. Sa’dijah, N. Ishartono, S. Widodo, A. Rahman, and M. Hudha, “Interference in solving mathematical problems,” 2019, doi: 10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2281319.
E. Jacobson, J. Lobato, and C. H. Orrill, “Middle school teachers use of mathematics to make sense of student solutions to proportional reasoning problems,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1541–1559, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9845-z.
A. K. Jitendra, M. R. Harwell, D. N. Dupuis, and S. R. Karl, “A randomized trial of the effects of schema-based instruction on proportional problem-solving for students with mathematics problem-solving difficulties,” J. Learn. Disabil., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 322–336, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0022219416629646.
Setiyani, D. P. Putri, F. Ferdianto, and S. H. Fauji, “Designing a digital teaching module based on mathematical communication in relation and function,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223–236, 2020, doi: 10.22342/jme.11.2.7320.223-236.
W. E. Maryati, E. Retnowati, and N. K. Thoe, “Learning mathematics formulas by listening and reading worked example,” Indones. J. Teach. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2022.
T. van Gog, L. Kester, K. Dirkx, V. Hoogerheide, J. Boerboom, and P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen, “Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–289, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3.
O. Chen, E. Retnowati, and S. Kalyuga, “Element interactivity as a factor influencing the effectiveness of worked example–problem solving and problem solving–worked example sequences,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 90, no. S1, pp. 210–223, 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12317.
J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.
A. Renkl, “Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 1997, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1.
V. Hoogerheide, S. M. M. Loyens, and T. Van Gog, “Comparing the effects of worked examples and modeling examples on learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 41, pp. 80–91, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.013.
A. Renkl, “Learning from worked-examples in mathematics: students relate procedures to principles,” ZDM - Math. Educ., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 571–584, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11858-017-0859-3.
C. Schadl and S. Ufer, “Mathematical knowledge and skills as longitudinal predictors of fraction learning among sixth-grade students.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 985–1003, 2023, doi: 10.1037/edu0000808.
C. A. H. F. Santosa, I. Rafianti, and D. Yulistiany, “Worked-example method on mathematical problem-solving ability in term of students’ initial ability,” Kreano, J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 210–220, 2022, doi: 10.15294/kreano.v13i2.33301.
K. N. Begolli, “Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability,” Instr. Sci., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 441–473, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9.
J. W. Creswell and V. L. Pl. Clark, Design and conducting mixed metohods research, 2nd ed. Thosand oaks: SAGE Publications, 2010.
E. P. Vollman, “Learning beyond accuracy : evidence for worked examples as support for students ’ proportional reasoning gains,” no. June, pp. 9–53, 2021.
B. Bentley and G. C. R. Yates, “Facilitating proportional reasoning through worked examples : Two classroom-based experiments Facilitating proportional reasoning through worked examples : Two classroom-based experiments,” Cogent Educ., vol. 197, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1297213.
A. Prayitno, A. Rossa, F. D. Widayanti, S. Rahayuningsih, A. H. B, and M. Baidawi, “Characteristics of students ’ proportional reasoning insSolving missing value problem characteristics of students ’ proportional reasoning in solving missing value problem,” 2018.
B. Bentley and G. C. R. Yates, “Facilitating proportional reasoning through worked examples : Two classroom-based experiments,” Cogent Educ., vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1297213.
T. van Gog and N. Rummel, “Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–174, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7.
E. Retnowati, P. Ayres, and J. Sweller, “Worked example effects in individual and group work settings,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 349–367, 2010, doi: 10.1080/01443411003659960.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
