DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i4.6828
Exploring the Nexus: Benchmarking and Educational Institution Performance
Menjelajahi Nexus: Benchmarking dan Kinerja Lembaga Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.3753Keywords:
Benchmarking, Performance, CompetitivenessAbstract
Whether an educational institution develops or not depens on its performance. To improve this performance, many things are done, including how leaders help improve institutional performance in developing competitiveness, one of wich is through benchmarking. From this, researchers want to know whether there is a relationship between benchmarking and institutional performance. The research method used in this research is a quantitative approach. The data collection method uses a Likert scale. The population and sample use a saturated sample technique or a total sample with 35 respondents. The data analysis technique uses Product Moment correlation. This research shows a relationship between benchmarking and institutional performance with evidence of a product-moment correlation value of 0.430 with a significance value of 0.010 (p < 0.05), which means that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. This research provides implications for benchmarking and institutional performance in competitiveness development.
Downloads
References
D. Stumbriene, A. S. Camanho, and A. Jakaitiene, The performance of education systems in the light of Europe 2020 strategy, vol. 288, no. 2. Springer US, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03329-5.
M. Salas-Velasco, “The technical efficiency performance of the higher education systems based on data envelopment analysis with an illustration for the Spanish case,” Educ. Res. Policy Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 159–180, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10671-019-09254-5.
B. Phadermrod, R. M. Crowder, and G. B. Wills, “Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 44, pp. 194–203, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009.
M. C. A. Silva, A. S. Camanho, and F. Barbosa, “Benchmarking of secondary schools based on Students’ results in higher education,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 95, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102119.
M. Hakim, “Strategi Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru…,” J. Ilm. Iqra, vol. 15, no. 2007, pp. 1693–5705, 2021.
S. Bhattacharya, K. S. Momaya, and K. C. Iyer, “Benchmarking enablers to achieve growth performance: a conceptual framework,” Benchmarking, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1475–1501, 2020, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-08-2019-0376.
A. Gutierrez, A. Ansuategi, L. Susperregi, C. Tubío, I. Rankić, and L. Lenža, “A Benchmarking of Learning Strategies for Pest Detection and Identification on Tomato Plants for Autonomous Scouting Robots Using Internal Databases,” J. Sensors, vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/5219471.
H. Mukhtar, H. K. Anwar, and E. K. Harahap, “Benchmarking Head of Madrasah in Doing Madrasah Transformation in Jambi Province,” Int. J. Res. -GRANTHAALAYAH, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 281–299, 2019, doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i4.2019.902.
O. Maharani and I. Rindaningsih, “Penilaian Kinerja Sebagai Penentu Prestasi dan Kinerja Tenaga Kependidikan: Literature Review,” MAMEN J. Manaj., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 159–170, 2023, doi: 10.55123/mamen.v2i1.1626.
A. Skourdoumbis, “International ‘benchmarking’ studies and the identification of ‘education best practice’: A focus on classroom teachers and their practices,” Aust. Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 411–423, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13384-013-0142-8.
C. M. Abd Hamid Wahid, Kholilur Rahman, Najiburrahman Najiburrahman, Ahmad Fauzi, Hasan Baharun, “Management of Islamic Higher Education Based on Benchmarking and Information Technology in the Revolutionary Era 4.0,” Proc. 1st Work. Environ. Sci. Soc. Technol., 2019, [Online]. Available: https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2284035 %0D%0A
J. Coupet and Y. Ba, “Benchmarking university technology transfer performance with external research funding: a stochastic frontier analysis,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 605–620, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10961-021-09856-3.
M. H. Le, M. Afsharian, and H. Ahn, “Inverse Frontier-based Benchmarking for Investigating the Efficiency and Achieving the Targets in the Vietnamese Education System,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 103, p. 102427, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2021.102427.
M. A. Camilleri, “Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: a systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook,” Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 268–281, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0034.
V. K. Gupta and J. J. Thakkar, “A quantitative risk assessment methodology for construction project,” Sadhana - Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12046-018-0846-6.
L. J. Moleong, metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019.
M. Mengoni, M. Germani, and M. Peruzzini, “Benchmarking of virtual reality performance in mechanics education,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s12008-011-0119-7.
M. E. Bodner, R. E. Rhodes, W. C. Miller, and E. Dean, “Benchmarking curriculum content in entry-level health professional education with special reference to health promotion practice in physical therapy: A multi-institutional international study,” Adv. Heal. Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 645–657, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9404-x.
M. Izadikhah and R. Farzipoor Saen, Ranking sustainable suppliers by context-dependent data envelopment analysis, vol. 293, no. 2. Springer US, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03370-4.
P. P. Tran, K. C. Kuo, W. M. Lu, and Q. L. Kweh, “Benchmarking in Vietnam universities: teaching and research and revenue efficiencies,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09622-z.
M. K. Hossain and V. Thakur, “Benchmarking health-care supply chain by implementing Industry 4.0: a fuzzy-AHP-DEMATEL approach,” Benchmarking, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 556–581, 2021, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0268.
H. Zhou, Y. Yang, Y. Chen, and J. Zhu, “Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023.
S. Welling and S. O. Ryding, “Distribution of environmental performance in life cycle assessments—implications for environmental benchmarking,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 275–289, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11367-020-01852-3.
T. Agasisti, G. Munda, and R. Hippe, “Measuring the efficiency of European education systems by combining Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple-Criteria Evaluation,” J. Product. Anal., vol. 51, no. 2–3, pp. 105–124, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11123-019-00549-6.
J. O’Reilly et al., “Five characteristics of youth unemployment in Europe: Flexibility, education, migration, family legacies, and EU policy,” SAGE Open, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1177/2158244015574962.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
