Preprint has been submitted for publication in journal
Preprint / Version 1

The Relationship Between Conformity And Prosocial Behavior In Students Of Muhammadiyah University Sidoarjo


Hubungan Antara Konformitas Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.3004

Keywords:

College Students, Conformity, Prosocial Behaviour

Abstract

Abstract. his study aims to measure the relationship between conformity and prosocial behavior among students at Muhammadiyah University Sidoarjo. The research design is quantitative correlational, with a population of 10,225 students at Muhammadiyah University. The sample size was determined using the Krejcie Morgan Table with a significance level of 0.05, resulting in 370 students. The scales used are conformity scale and prosocial behavior scale with the validity of reability of the scales are taken from used tryout adopted from previous research, with a reliability value of Cronbach's alpha 0.904 for the conformity measure and Cronbach's alpha 0.749 for the prosocial behavior measure.  The results of the test indicate a significant positive relationship between conformity and prosocial behavior with a correlation value of 0.589 and p < 0.001. This indicates that higher levels of conformity are associated with higher levels of prosocial behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Diananda, “Psikologi Remaja dan Permasalahannya,” ISTIGHNA J. Pendidik. dan Pemikir. Islam. Vol 1, No 1 Ed. JANUARIDO - 10.33853/istighna.v1i1.20, Jan. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.stit-islamic-village.ac.id/istighna/article/view/20

S. W. Sarwono, Psikologi Remaja, Vol.19. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

A. N. Umayah, A. Ariyanto, and W. Yustisia, “Pengaruh Empati Emosional Terhadap Perilaku Prososial yang di moderasi oleh Jenis Kelamin Pada Mahasiswa,” J. Psikol. Sos., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2017, doi: 10.7454/jps.2017.7.

Ahmad Susanto, Bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah : konsep, teori, dan aplikasi . Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

L. Tian, M. Du, and E. S. Huebner, “The Effect of Gratitude on Elementary School Students’ Subjective Well-Being in Schools: The Mediating Role of Prosocial Behavior,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 887–904, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0712-9.

Y. Yang, P. Li, X. Fu, and Y. Kou, “Orientations to Happiness and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adolescents: The Roles of Prosocial Behavior and Internet Addictive Behavior,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1747–1762, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9794-1.

G. Carlo, M. V. Mestre, M. M. McGinley, A. Tur-Porcar, P. Samper, and D. Opal, “The Protective Role of Prosocial Behaviors on Antisocial Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Deviant Peer Affiliation,” J. Adolesc., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 359–366, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.009.

N. Hasanah and R. Drupadi, “Perilaku Prososial Anak selama Pandemi Covid-19,” vol. 5, 2020.

B. C. Kristianto, “Perilaku Prososial pada Mahasiswa Baru Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Angkatan 2019 Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta,” Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta, 2020.

F. Y. Rafles, “Tingkat Perilaku Prososial pada Mahasiswa yang Melakukan Slacktivism,” Skripsi) Yogyakarta Univ. Sanata Dharma, 2018.

A. Rahmawati and E. R. Kustanti, “Hubungan Antara Konformitas Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Siswa Smp Ky Ageng Giri Di Pondok Pesantren Girikesumo, Mranggen Demak,” J. EMPATI, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 201–204, 2021, doi: 10.14710/empati.2021.31284.

M. Sartika and H. Yandri, “Pengaruh Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok Terhadap Konformitas Teman Sebaya,” Indones. J. Couns. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2019, doi: 10.32939/ijcd.v1i1.351.

N. Nurhafiza, “Hubungan Konformitas Teman Sebaya Dengan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Perilaku Prososial,” Cons. Berk. Kaji. Konseling dan Ilmu Keagamaan, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 28, 2019, doi: 10.37064/consilium.v6i1.4813.

E. Kurniawati, “Hubungan antara Konformitas dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Penggemar EXO (EXO-L),” Skripsi, pp. 1–126, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/22650/

A. Santoso, “Hubungan Antara Konformitas Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Penggemar Korean Pop.” Universitas Katholik Soegijapranata Semarang, 2023.

K. A. Lestari and N. Fauziah, “Hubungan antara Konformitas dengan Motivasi Belajar pada Siswa di SMA Muhammadiyah Kudus,” J. Empati, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 717–720, 2017.

F. Saguni, “Pengaruh Locus of Control Dan Perilaku Pro Sosial Mahasiswa,” J. UIN Datokarama Palu, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163–177, 2022.

S. Vatmawati, “Hubungan Konformitas Siswa Dengan Pengambilan Keputusan Karir,” EMPATI-Jurnal Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.26877/empati.v6i1.4114.

E. L. Risyawirasthi and D. K. Dewi, “Konformitas Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Surabaya Setelah Masa Perkuliahan Online,” J. Penelit. Psikol., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 196–205, 2022.

F. Nasution, M. Uyun, and S. Erlita, “Konformitas dan Prokrastinasi Akademik pada Mahasiswa,” Indones. J. Behav. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 271–282, 2021, doi: 10.19109/ijobs.v1i2.9291.

R. A. S. Purba and R. Hayati, “Hubungan Konformitas Dengan Perilaku Prososial Siswa Di SMP RK. Deli Murni Delitua,” Invent. J. Res. Educ. Stud., pp. 36–44, 2023.

F. Almeida, I. Superior, P. Gaya, A. Queirós, and D. Faria, “Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods Innovation and Entrepreneurship View project Observatory of Portuguese Academic Spin-offs View project European Journal of Education Studies STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF QUALITATIV,” pp. 369–387, 2017, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.887089.

O. D. Apuke, “Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach,” Kuwait Chapter Arab. J. Bus. Manag. Rev., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 40–47, 2017, doi: 10.12816/0040336.

Hameed: Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 18–27, 2016.

I. Etikan and K. Bala, “Sampling and Sampling Methods,” Bio[1] I. Etikan K. Bala, “Sampling Sampl. Methods,” Biometrics Biostat. Int. J., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5–7, 2017, doi 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149.metrics Biostat. Int. J., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5–7, 2017, doi: 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149.

R. Ratu, “Hubungan Antara Konformitas dengan Prokrastinasi Akademik pada Mahasiwa,” Universitas Diponegoro, 2017.

A. Romiyati, “Hubungan Empati Dengan Perilaku Prososial Mahasiswa Program Studi Bimbingan Dan Konseling Universitas Jambi,” Universitas Jambi, 2023.

J. W. Creswell and J. David Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2018.

O. L. O. Astivia and B. D. Zumbo, “Population Models and Simulation Methods: The Case of the Spearman Rank Correlation,” Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 347–367, 2017, doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12085.

A. Abdullah and S. W. R. I. Handayani, “Hubungan Konformitas dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Pedagang Kaki Lima di Jalan Pasar Besar Malang,” PSIKOVIDYA, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2015.

N. Hafiza, N. Neviyarni, and Y. Syukur, “The Relationship of Religiosity and Peer Conformity with Students’ Attitude toward Prosocial Behavior,” no. 2015, pp. 264–269, 2018, doi: 10.29210/2018138.

O. Stavrova, T. Schlösser, and D. Fetchenhauer, “Are Virtuous People Happy All Around the World? Civic Virtue, Antisocial Punishment, and Subjective Well-Being Across Cultures,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 927–942, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0146167213485902.

S. Park and J. Shin, “The Influence of Anonymous Peers on Prosocial Behavior,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, p. e0185521, 2017.

R. B. Cialdini and N. J. Goldstein, “Social influence: Compliance and conformity,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1974, pp. 591–621, 2004, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.

S.-J. Blakemore, “Avoiding Social Risk in Adolescence,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2018.

E. C. Nook, D. C. Ong, S. A. Morelli, J. P. Mitchell, and J. Zaki, “Prosocial Conformity: Prosocial Norms Generalize Across Behavior and Empathy,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1045–1062, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0146167216649932.

Posted

2023-08-29