The Effect of Analogy Learning Through Selective Problem Solving (SPS) on Learning Outcomes of Area Measurement in Elementary School
Pengaruh Pembelajaran Analogi Melalui Selective Problem Solving (SPS) terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengukuran Luas di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.2888Keywords:
Analogy, Problem Solving, AreaAbstract
This study aims to identify the effect of analogy learning through Selective Problem Solving (SPS) on learning outcomes in area measurement material. This research uses a quantitative approach with experimental research type and uses one-shot case study design. The research subjects were fifth grade elementary school as many as 25 students in mathematics learning materials. Selection of research subjects using saturated sampling technique. Data collection techniques using tests. Data analysis consists of descriptive statistics, validity, reliability, normality testing, t-test. The research instrument is a test consisting of source problems and target problems. The results of learning analogies through SPS obtained are 0.90 <0.05, which shows that SPS-based analogies learning has an impact on students' thinking skills. The effect of student learning outcomes in this analogy learning is that students are able to think more creatively and make it easier for students to find concepts that will solve problems.
Downloads
References
M. P. Azmi, “analisis pengembangan tes kemampuan analogi matematis pada materi segi empat,” JURING (Journal Res. Math. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 099, 2019, doi: 10.24014/juring.v2i2.7490.
J. Sofiani, D. Nurjamil, and E. Nurhayati, “kemampuan penalaran analogi ditinjau dari self- concept,” J. Inov. Pembelajaran Mat. PowerMathEdu, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 17–30, 2023.
D. Agusantia and D. Juandi, “Kemampuan penalaran analogi matematis di Indonesia: systematic literature review,” Symmetry Pas. J. Res. Math. Learn. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 2022, doi: 10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6436.
G. Dwirahayu, Pendekatan Analogi dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Matematika Siswa. 2018.
U. Sak, “selective problem solving (sps): a model for teaching creative problem-solving,” Gift. Educ. Int., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 349–357, 2011, doi: 10.1177/026142941102700310.
U. Endardini, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran selective problem solving (SPS) terhadap kemampuan higher order thinking skill dan disposisi matematika,” p. 224, 2017.
A. Fauzan, “applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometry in indonesian primary schools,” 2002. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012049.
M. Nurwahid, “analisis kesalahan siswa SD dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan luas gabungan bangun datar berdasarkan watson’s error category,” J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 308–319, 2021, doi: 10.31004/joe.v3i4.388.
I. Fauzi and A. Arisetyawan, “analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi geometri,” J. Mat. Kreat. Inov., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 26–35, 2020, doi: 10.36418/jurnalsostech.v2i7.377.
R. Andriani and R. Rasto, “motivasi belajar sebagai determinan hasil belajar siswa,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 80, 2019, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v4i1.14958.
A. Septian, D. Agustina, and D. Maghfirah, “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika,” Mathema J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 10, 2020, doi: 10.33365/jm.v2i2.652.
M. Nainggolan, D. S. Tanjung, and E. J. Simarmata, “pengaruh model pembelajaran savi terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa di sekolah dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2617–2625, 2021, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1235.
E. W. Bagus, I. Isnarto, A. Nur Cahyono, J. Kartini Bawen No, and J. Tengah, “mathematical problem solving ability of vocational school students reviewed from self regulated learning in selective problem solving (SPS) assisted learning management system (LMS) learning,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2022–171, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Z. Arifin, “kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian,” J. Theorems (the Orig. Res. Math., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2017.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Bisnis : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi dan R&D. Alfabeta, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=aFHZzwEACAAJ
D. I. Rahmawati and R. H. Pala, “kemampuan penalaran analogi dalam pembelajaran matematika,” Euclid, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 717–725, 2017, doi: 10.33603/e.v4i2.317.
R. H. Kaban, D. Anzelina, R. Sinaga, and P. J. Silaban, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PAKEM terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.574.
E. Evendi, “intervensi model pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap peningkatan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa,” J. Pemikir. dan Penelit. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 2022, doi: 10.36765/jp3m.v5i2.579.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
