Google's Legal Responsibility in Displaying Phishing Ads Through Google AdWords
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Google dalam Penayangan Iklan Phishing melalui Google AdWords
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.1548Keywords:
Phising Ads, Google, Google AdWordsAbstract
The discovery of phishing website advertisements served by Google AdWords advertising platform, which raises the question whether Google AdWords has filtered the advertisements that been submitted on advertising services and whether Google as provider of Google AdWords can be punished for phishing advertisements that appear in advertising services. Phishing is a criminal tool to steal sensitive information belonging to users and commit crimes on the Internet for benefit who can harm victims. Provisions regarding phishing are regulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. The research method used is normative juridical method with a statutory approach. Using deductive analysis to analyze legal materials. The results of the research show that Google must be responsible for its advertising platform, namely Google AdWords for advertising phishing websites, where this has violated the rules in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Article 28 Paragraph (1).
Downloads
References
L. J. Trautman, M. Hussein, E. U. Opara, And S. Rahman, “Posted: No Phishing,” Ssrn Electron. J., 2020, Doi: 10.2139/Ssrn.3549992.
O. P. Barus, “Perbangingan Metode Extreme Learning Machine Dan Backpropagation Untuk Mengklasifikasi Phising Websites,” Informatics Engineering Research And Technology, Vol. 1 No.1, Jul. 2019.
“Google Safe Browsing Api.”, [Online]. Available: Http://Code.Google.Com/Apis/Safebrowsing/.
“Microsoft Smart Screen.”, [Online]. Available: Http://Windows.Microsoft.Com/En-Us/ Windows-Vista/Smartscreen-Filter-Frequently-Asked-Questions.
R. Yustitiana, “Pelaksanaan Pengaturan Hukum Tindak Kejahatan ‘Fraud Phising’ Transaksi Elektronik Sebagai Bagian Dari Upaya Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Teori Efektivitas Hukum.” Jul. 31, 2021.
F. Kwarto And M. Angsito, “Pengaruh Cyber Crime Terhadap Cyber Security Compliance Di Sektor Keuangan,” J. Akunt. Bisnis, Vol. 11, No. 2, Nov. 2018, Doi: 10.30813/Jab.V11i2.1382.
M. Hayati And D. Fata, “Analisis Keamanan Informasi Pengguna Media Sosial Menggunakan Setoolkit Melalui Teknik Phising,” Djtechno J. Teknol. Inf., Vol. 2, No. 1, Pp. 21–28, Jul. 2021, Doi: 10.46576/Djtechno.V2i1.1252.
Z. Efendy, I. E. Putra, And R. Saputra, “Asset Rental Information System And Web-Based Facilities At Andalas University,” J. Terap. Teknol. Inf., Vol. 2, No. 2, Pp. 135–146, Feb. 2019, Doi: 10.21460/Jutei.2018.22.103.
H. Hasanah, “Pemanfaatan Digital Marketing Menggunakan Website Dan Media Sosial Untuk Meningkatkan Pemasaran Produk,” Dikemas J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., Vol. 4, No. 2, Oct. 2020, Doi: 10.32486/Jd.V4i2.469.
N. Karmila, “Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Kinerja Sector Publik, Meliputi Pertanggungjawaban Kualitas Layanan Dan Informasi Layanan Publik Yang Dapat Diakses Dengan Mudah,” Dec. 2018, Doi: 10.31227/Osf.Io/Utmbg.
V. F. Putra Y, “Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Phising Menurut Uu Ite,” Jurist-Diction, Vol. 4, No. 6, P. 2525, Nov. 2021, Doi: 10.20473/Jd.V4i6.31857.
A. C. Banjarnahor And P. Priyana, “Analisis Yuridis Cybercrime Terhadap Penanganan Kasus Phising Kredivo,” Hermeneutika J. Ilmu Huk., Vol. 6, No. 1, Feb. 2022, Doi: 10.33603/Hermeneutika.V6i1.6754.
A. S. Gulo, S. Lasmadi, And K. Nawawi, “Cyber Crime Dalam Bentuk Phising Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Pampas J. Crim. Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, Pp. 68–81, Apr. 2021, Doi: 10.22437/Pampas.V1i2.9574.
F. Nur Latifah, I. Mawardi, And B. Wardhana, “Threat Of Data Theft (Phishing) Amid Trends In Fintech Users During The Covid-19 Pandemic (Study Phishing In Indonesia),” Perisai Islam. Bank. Finance J., Vol. 6, No. 1, Pp. 74–86, Apr. 2022, Doi: 10.21070/Perisai.V6i1.1598.
K. Khatimah And E. Erlina, “Tinjaun Hukum Islam Terhadap Jual Beli Secara Daring (Online) Terhadap Barang Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Iklan (Study Kasus Ars Shop Samata Gowa),” Iqtishaduna J. Ilm. Mhs. Huk. Ekon. Syariah, Vol. 2, No. 2, P. 64, Aug. 2020, Doi: 10.24252/Iqtishaduna.V2i2.16426.
A. Mishra And Fancy, “Efficient Detection Of Phising Hyperlinks Using Machine Learning,” Int. J. Cybern. Inform., Vol. 10, No. 2, Pp. 23–33, May 2021, Doi: 10.5121/Ijci.2021.100204.
O. Sandy, “Iklan Website Phising Yang Mirip Dengan Website Phantom”, [Online]. Available: Https://Cyberthreat.Id/Read/12845/Peretas-Manfaatkan-Iklan-Google-Targetkan-Pengguna-Dompet-Kripto-Phantom-Dan-Metamask
T. Luno, “Iklan Website Phising Yang Mirip Dengan Website Luno”, [Online]. Available: Https://Discover.Luno.Com/Id/Waspada-Penipuan-Phishing-Di-Iklan-Google/
E. Saputri, “Strategi Penelusuran Informasi Melalui Search Engine (Google),” J. Adab., Vol. 23, No. 2, P. 232, Aug. 2021, Doi: 10.22373/Adabiya.V23i2.10137.
G. Ads, “Tanggung Jawab Pengiklan”, [Online]. Available: Https://Support.Google.Com/Adspolicy/Answer/9703665#900
D. P. Indonesia, “Etika Pariwara Indonesia Amandemen 2020.” Dewan Periklanan Indonesia, 2020.
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
