The Legal Review of Active Military Officers Serving in Civilian Positions
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap TNI Aktif yang Menjabat Pada Posisi-Posisi Sipil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.11579Keywords:
military, Civilian Positions, Constituional CourtAbstract
This study aimed to examine the practice of placing active Indonesian military personnel in civilian positions and its relevance to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 114/PUU-XXIII/2025 concerning the limitation of civilian positions for active police officers as a basis for such restrictions. The main issue lay in the expansion of civilian positions that could be occupied by active military personnel following the amendment of Law Number 34 of 2004 into Law Number 3 of 2025, which potentially blurred the principle of civilian supremacy and raised concerns about the return of the ABRI dual function during the New Order era. This study used a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual. The results of this study showed that Constitutional Court Decision Number 114/PUU-XIII/2025 regarding restrictions on civilian positions held by active police officers could not be directly applied to the military due to differences in the legal basis governing both institutions.
References
T. K. Sofuan, “Mengulik Sejarah Penerapan Dwifungsi Abri Pada Masa Orde Baru,” J. Univpgri, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 162–170, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.31851/kalp.v9i2.14555
M. K. A. Razaq, “Militerisme dan Demokrasi : Evaluasi Hak Politik TNI-Polri di Indonesia Pasca-Reformasi,” Welf. STATE J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 251–272, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v3i2.3517
A. Pengesahan et al., “Analisis Implikasi Pengesahan RUU TNI Dalam Sinergi Sipil-Militer dan Konsolidasi Demokrasi di Indonesia,” Glob. Komunika J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2025. doi : https://doi.org/10.33822/gk.v8i1.10919
K. N. Khaliq Pohan, K. A. Putri Rosano, N. R. Ayu, N. Chairul, and J. Indrawan, “Demokrasi di Bawah Militerisme: Kritik Sosial terhadap Implementasi Uu TNI dan Implikasinya Bagi Keamanan Nasional”, ijlj, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 15, Dec. 2025. doi : https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i2.5225
I. Yosarie, “Revisi Tanpa Semangat Reformasi : Residu Dwifungsi ABRI Dalam Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 Tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia Revision Without the Spirit of Reform : Residues of the ABRI ’ s Dual Function in the Revision of Law Number 34 of 20,” SOCIA J. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2025. doi : https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v22i1.88970
C. Nugroho, “Politik Hukum RUU TNI / Polri : Antara Kepentingan Geopolitik dan Tekanan Masyarakat Sipil,” Maliki Interdiscip. J., vol. 3, pp. 784–788, 2025.
doi: ttps://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/15490
A. Anwar, “Dwi Fungsi ABRI : Melacak Sejarah Keterlibatan ABRI dalam Kehidupan Sosial Politik dan Perekonomian Indonesia,” J. Adab., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–46, 2018.
doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/adabiya.v20i1.6776
W. Hoetomo, H. K., & Thukul, “Upaya Keluar Kandang ( Barak ) oleh TNI : Reformasi yang Berputar di Tempat ?,” unpublished, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34172.65927
A. H. K. S. Harahap, “Klasifikasi Sentimen Masyarakat Terhadap Revisi Undang-Undang Tentara Nasional Indonesia Menggunakan Naïve Bayes Classifier,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 594–603, 2025, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i4.615. doi : https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i4.615
Tempo, “Sederet Perwira TNI Aktif yang Duduki Jabatan Sipil di Kementerian dan BUMN,” 2025. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/sederet-perwira-tni-aktif-yang-duduki-jabatan-sipil-di-kementerian-dan-bumn-1222235
Tempo, “MK Putuskan Polisi Aktif Tidak Boleh Menduduki Jabatan Sipil,” 2025. https://www.tempo.co/politik/mk-putuskan-polisi-aktif-tidak-boleh-menduduki-jabatan-sipil-2089189
M. Safitri and A. Wibowo, “Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Negara Indonesia (Mengenal Mahkamah Konstitusi),” J. Penelit. Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2023.
doi: https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.106.
L. Nasir, S. Rijal, and M. A. Akbar, “Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia,” J. USM Law Rev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 622–638, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11333
U. Rabbani, R. A., Nurkania, R., Salimah, S., & Rosidin, “Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Judicial Review terhadap Sistem Hukum di Indonesia,” ALADALAH J. Polit. Sos. Huk. dan Hum., vol. 4, no. 1, 2026.
doi: https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1747
D. Fridayanti, “Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan MK No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024,” Leg. J. Huk. dan Perundang-Undangan, vol. 5, no. 1, 2025.
doi: https://ejournal.uinsatu.ac.id/index.php/legacy/article/view/10690
S. Karso, A. J., Wahyudi, W., & Sukino, Buku Ajar Konstitusi dan Kelembagaan Negara Indonesia. 2025. doi:https://books.google.co.id/books?id=m6asEQAAQBAJ&lpg=PA1&ots=O-_BDePZ34&dq=S.%20Karso%2C%20A.%20J.%2C%20Wahyudi%2C%20W.%2C%20%26%20Sukino%2C%20Buku%20Ajar%20Konstitusi%20dan%20Kelembagaan%20Negara%20Indonesia.%202025.&lr&hl=id&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
F. Amin, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Prinsip Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia : Studi Putusan Judicial Review Tahun 2019 – 2024,” J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 4467–4475, 2025.doi: https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i6.1856
R. Vicenzo and T. H. Sitabuana, “Kedudukan dan peranan mahkamah konstitusi dalam sistem kenegaraan,” Pros. serina, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 139–146, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v2i1.18520
I. V. Suma, M. P. M., & Worang, “Aktualisasi UUD 1945 dalam Praksis Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Pratyaksa J. Ilmu Pendidikan, Sos. dan Hum., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 30–39, 2025. doi: https://e-journal.samsarainstitute.com/jipsh/article/view/154
P. Efendi, “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 114/PUU-XXII/2025 (Larangan Polri Menduduki Jabatan Sipil) Dalam Perspektif Futuristik Hukum,” Pros. Sinergitek Univ. Labuhanbatu, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 309–314, 2025. doi: https://jurnal.ulb.ac.id/index.php/sinergitek/article/view/9010
“PENGISIAN JABATAN SIPIL OLEH ANGGOTA POLRI AKTIF PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 114/PUU-XXIII/2025 DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP MERITOKRASI”, JMA, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.62281/gsxjdc20
B. H. C. Handoyo, “Idealisme Constituendum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar,” Arena Huk., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.1
A. Radjak, S., & Ahmad, “Menguji Batas Kewenangan: Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas UUD 1945 Dalam Dinamika Demokrasi Modern,” Al-Zayn J. Ilmu Sos. Huk., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1800–1815, 2025. doi : https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1436
A. D. P. Hardiyati and M. T. Multazam, “Freedom of Speech Boundaries in Criticizing Government on Social Media: Batasan Kebebasan Berekspresi dalam Mengkritik Pemerintah di Media Sosial”, IJPPR, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 10.21070/ijppr.v26i3.1458, Jul. 2025. doi : https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v26i3.1458
R. R. Azharil, M. M. F., & Phahlevy, “Constitutional Court Rulings on Electoral Thresholds in Indonesia: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Ambang Batas Pemilihan di Indonesia,” Acad. Open, vol. 10, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.11940. doi : https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.11940
Downloads
Additional Files
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UMSIDA Preprints Server
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
