"Authors","Author full names","Author(s) ID","Title","Year","Source title","Volume","Issue","Art. No.","Page start","Page end","Page count","Cited by","DOI","Link","Affiliations","Authors with affiliations","Abstract","Author Keywords","Index Keywords","Molecular Sequence Numbers","Chemicals/CAS","Tradenames","Manufacturers","Funding Details","Funding Texts","References","Correspondence Address","Editors","Publisher","Sponsors","Conference name","Conference date","Conference location","Conference code","ISSN","ISBN","CODEN","PubMed ID","Language of Original Document","Abbreviated Source Title","Document Type","Publication Stage","Open Access","Source","EID"
"Anggraini F.; Abdul-Hamid M.A.; Kassim Aza Azlina M.D.","Anggraini, Fivi (57205446253); Abdul-Hamid, Mohamad Ali (13609051900); Kassim Aza Azlina, M.D. (57211314152)","57205446253; 13609051900; 57211314152","Competitive advantage as mediating role of intellectual capital and university performance: An empirical study in Indonesia","2018","International Journal of Economics and Management","12","Special Issue  2","","351","363","12","2","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073469635&partnerID=40&md5=d731b246d65f87c37eebb7f1fe9a894f","Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Universiti Selangor, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40000, Malaysia","Anggraini F., Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; Abdul-Hamid M.A., Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Kassim Aza Azlina M.D., Universiti Selangor, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40000, Malaysia","One of important elements that can be used by a university in order to be sustained in the global high learning challenges is optimization of its competitive advantage to increase its performances. This study aims to determine the effects of competitive advantage in mediating the relationship between intellectual capital and the performance of public universities in Indonesia. A questionnaires survey was used to collect the data via online manner from 177 respondents of 8 public universities in Indonesia that are listed in the QS World University Rankings. The Wrap Partial Least Square (PLS) program was used to analyse the data and test the hypotheses. The findings had confirmed a significant a partial type of mediation relationship between intellectual capital and university performance through the competitive advantage in Indonesia. The confirmation value of a partial type of mediation relationship between intellectual capital and university performance was 24.8 percent. This study had successfully proved that competitive advantage plays a crucial role to mediate the relationships between intellectual capitals and the performance of public universities in Indonesia. Conclusively, the implication of study has suggested universities to allocate more investment on their intellectual capital development in an effort to improve their performances. © 2018, Universita Putra Malaysia.","Academic performance; Competitive advantage; Intellectual capital; Management performance; University performance","","","","","","","","Anggraini F., Ali M.A.H., Aza A.M.K., Intellectual capital and Indonesia universities performance, Paper presented at Annual Bangkok Business and Social Science Research Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. 3-4 June, 2016, (2016); Ahmadi F., Parizi Z., Meyhani B., Ziaee M., Intellectual capital accounting and its role in creating competitive advantage at the universities, Inter-discriminary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business., 4, 1, pp. 45-58, (2012); Balaji Y., Makhija M., The knowledge imperative, (2001); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management., 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Baron R.M., Kenny D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986); Bontis N., Crossan M.M., Hulland J., Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows, Journal of Management Studies., 39, 4, pp. 437-469, (2002); Bontis N., Seleim A., Ashour A., Human capital and organisational performance: a study of Egyptian software companies, Management Decision., 45, 4, pp. 789-801, (2007); Chandler G., Hanks S., Market attractiveness resource-based capabilities, venture strategies and venture performance, Journal of Business Venturing., 9, 6, pp. 331-349, (1994); Chang S.C., Chen S.S., Lai J.H., The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances, International Journal of Management Science., 36, 2, pp. 298-316, (2008); Chowdhury M.M.H., Ethical issues as competitive advantage for bank management, Humanomics., 27, 2, pp. 109-120, (2011); Grant R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal., 17, 6, pp. 109-122, (1996); Cohen J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (1988); Cooper D.R., Emory C.W., Business Research Methods, 5th edition, Richard D, (1995); Decarolis D.M., Deeds D.L., The impact of stock and flows of organisational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal., 20, 7, pp. 953-968, (2006); Fahy J., The Resource-based view of the Firm: Some Stumbling-blocks on the Road to Understanding Sustainable Competitive, Journal of European Industrial Training., 24, pp. 94-104, (2000); Fjardon C.M., Martos M.S., Intellectual capital and performance in wood industries of Argentina, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 10, 4, pp. 1469-1930, (2009); Grant R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal., 17, 6, pp. 109-122, (1996); Hair J., Hult T., Ringle C., Sartstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, (2013); Hazline H., Zubaidah Z.A., Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia, International Journal of Economic and Finance., 1, 1, pp. 150-164, (2009); Ho B., Insurer-provider networks in the medical care market, American Economic Review., 99, 1, pp. 393-430, (2009); Hughes J.C., Are our universities ready for a paradigm shift? The Globe and Mail, (2013); Jaradate O.M., Al-Samralie F.A., Jadallah N.A., Intellectual capital and its role in achieving competitive advantage: a field study for the Jordanian income tax service, European Journal of Science Research., 69, 3, pp. 399-415, (2012); Jose E.P., Welcome to the Moderation/Mediation Help Centre, (2008); Jones N., Meadow C., Sicilia M.A., Measuring intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management., 8, 2, pp. 113-136, (2009); Kamukama N., Ahiauzu A., Ntayi J.M., Competitive advantage: mediator of intellectual capital and performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 12, 1, pp. 52-164, (2011); Kamukama N., Intellectual capital: company's invisible source of competitive advantage, International Business Journal., 23, 3, pp. 260-283, (2013); Kangarlouei S.J Shadkami N., Motavassel M., The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantage of Vehicle Industries in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE), International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science., 2, 1, pp. 559-566, (2012); Khalique M., Shaari J.A.N., Isa M., Ageel A., Role of intellectual capital on the organizational performance of electrical and electronic SMEs in Pakistan, International Journal of Business Management., 6, 9, pp. 55-65, (2011); Kiong I.W.T., Lean H.H., Intellectual capital performance of financial institutions in Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 10, 4, pp. 588-599, (2009); Kock N., Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM, International Journal of e-collaboration., 10, 3, pp. 1-13, (2013); Kong E., Prior D., An intellectual capital perspective of competitive advantagein nonprofit organisations, International Journal Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing., 13, 2, pp. 119-128, (2008); Lindong L.A., A Cross-Case Study of the Competitive Advantage of Private Higher Educational Institutions in Kuching, Sarawak Doctoral dissertation, (2007); Lu W.M., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modeling Journal., 29, 2012, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); Maa H., Competitive advantage and firm performance, Competitiveness Review., 10, 2, pp. 15-32, (2000); Majeed S., The Impact of Competitive Advantage on Organizational Performance, European Journal of Business and Management., 3, 4, pp. 191-196, (2011); Martinez-Torres M.R., A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of intellectual capital: an exploratory study"", Information Management, 43, 5, pp. 617-626, (2006); Marr B., Roos G., A strategy perspective on intellectual capital: in Perspectives on intellectual capital multi-disciplinary insights into management, measurement and reporting, Marr, B, pp. 28-41, (2005); Meso P., Smith R., A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems, Journal of Knowledge Management., 4, 3, pp. 224-231, (2000); Meihami B., Karimi J., The relationship between intellectual capital reporting and universities performance, MAGNT Research Report., 2, 5, pp. 748-754, (2014); Morgan N.A., Kaleka A., Katsikeas C.S., Antecedents of Export Venture performance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment, Journal of Marketing., 68, pp. 90-108, (2004); Newbert S., Value rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal., 29, 2008, pp. 745-768, (2008); Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, (2001); Prajogo D.I., McDermott P., Examining competitive priorities and competitive advantage in service organisations using importance performance analysis matrix, Managing Service Quality., 21, 5, pp. 465-483, (2011); Porter M.E., Competitive advantages, (1985); Raduan C.R., Jegak U., Haslinda A., Alimin I.I., A conceptual framework, of the relationship between organizational resources, capabilities, systems, competitive advantage and performance, Research Journal of International Studies., 12, pp. 45-59, (2009); Raduan C.R., Jegak U., Haslinda A., Alimin I.I., A Review on the Relationship between Organization Resources, Competitive Advantages, and Performance, Journal of International Social Research., 3, pp. 11-21, (2010); Ramirez Y., Santos J.F., Tejada A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 12, 2011, pp. 356-376, (2011); Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C., Edvinsson L., Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape, (1997); Rumelt R., Schendel D., Teece D., Fundamental issues in strategy, Fundamental issues in strategy, pp. 9-47, (1994); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Seubert E., Balaji Y., Makhija M., The knowledge imperative, (2001); Sharabati A.A., Jawad S.N., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision., 48, 1, pp. 24-35, (2010); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian State University Contemporary Performance Plans: an Intellectual Capital Focus, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Spender J.C., Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal., 17, 5, pp. 45-62, (1996); Stiles P., Kulvisaechana S., Human capital and performance in public sector, Judge Institute of Management, (2004); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, (1997); Teece D.J., Pison G., Shuen A., Dynamic capability and strategic management, Strategic Journal., 18, 7, pp. 509-533, (1997); Tovstiga G., Tulugurova E., Intellectual capital practices: a four-region comparative study, Journal of Intellectual Capital., 10, 1, pp. 70-80, (2009); Tuan N.P., Yoshi T., The organizational capabilities, competitive advantage and performance in supporting industries in Vietnam, Asian Academy of Management Journal., 15, 1, pp. 11-12, (2010); Wang Y., Lo H.P., Customer-focused performance and the dynamic model for competence building and leveraging A resource-based view, Journal of Management Development., 22, pp. 483-526, (2003); Wang X., Performance measurement in universities; managerial perspective, (2010); Wiklund J., Shepherd D., Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses, Strategic Management Journal., 24, 13, pp. 1307-1314, (2003)","F. Anggraini; Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; email: fivianggraini@bunghatta.ac.id","","Universita Putra Malaysia","","","","","","1823836X","","","","English","Int. J. Econ. Manage.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85073469635"
"Nicolò G.; Raimo N.; Polcini P.T.; Vitolla F.","Nicolò, Giuseppe (57195628696); Raimo, Nicola (57206728937); Polcini, Paolo Tartaglia (57200109261); Vitolla, Filippo (56422376800)","57195628696; 57206728937; 57200109261; 56422376800","Unveiling the link between performance and Intellectual Capital disclosure in the context of Italian Public universities","2021","Evaluation and Program Planning","88","","101969","","","","24","10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101969","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108303659&doi=10.1016%2fj.evalprogplan.2021.101969&partnerID=40&md5=e7d2f35376d6cd400a85b6f90ee5eb71","Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084, SA, Italy; Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM Jean Monnet University, S.S. 100 Km 18, Casamassima, 7010, BA, Italy","Nicolò G., Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084, SA, Italy; Raimo N., Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM Jean Monnet University, S.S. 100 Km 18, Casamassima, 7010, BA, Italy; Polcini P.T., Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084, SA, Italy; Vitolla F., Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM Jean Monnet University, S.S. 100 Km 18, Casamassima, 7010, BA, Italy","This work aims to explore the relationship between academic performance and voluntary Intellectual Capital (IC) disclosure in the context of Italian Public Universities. This study applies a content analysis to investigate the extent of voluntary Intellectual Capital disclosure (ICD) provided through performance reports by a sample of 59 Italian public universities. Four multivariate regression models are estimated to examine the associations between academic performance and the level of ICD and its sub-components, namely Human Capital, Structural Capital and Relational Capital. The content analysis findings show that Italian public universities place a high value on disclosing human capital information. The results based on the multivariate analysis confirm the view that, in the case of higher performance, Italian Public Universities tend to convey a greater extent of information on both IC and its sub-components. This study broadens the scope of mainstream ICD literature's actions by bringing new expertise about the interconnections between university performance and voluntary ICD provided via performance reports. Connecting university performance to ICD can enhance the practical and theoretical understanding of the role that ICD may exert for universities to signalling their excellence and explain to stakeholders how they create value and achieve superior performance, focusing on their strategic - IC-based resources. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd","Intellectual Capital; Intellectual Capital Disclosure; Italian Public Universities; University performance","Italy; academic performance; human capital; multivariate analysis; performance assessment; stakeholder; university sector; academic achievement; article; content analysis; human; signal transduction; theoretical study","","","","","","","Almqvist R., Skoog M., Colliding discourses? New public management from an intellectual capital perspective, Intellectual capital revisited: Paradoxes in the knowledge intensive organization, pp. 100-123, (2007); Aversano N., Nicolo G., Sannino G., Polcini P.T., The Integrated Plan in Italian public universities: New patterns in intellectual capital disclosure, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 4, pp. 655-679, (2020); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, pp. 51-71, (2019); Cerbioni F., Parbonetti A., Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies, European Accounting Review, 16, 4, pp. 791-826, (2007); CIVIT, DELIBERA n. 89/2010 – “Indirizzi in materia di parametri e modelli di riferimento del Sistema di misurazione e valutazione della performance” (articoli 13, comma 6, lett. d) e 30, del decreto legislativo 27 ottobre 2009, n. 150), (2010); CIVIT, DELIBERA n. 112/2010 – “Struttura e modalità di redazione del Piano della performance” (articolo 10, comma 1, lettera a), del decreto legislativo 27 ottobre 2009, n. 150), (2010); Coy D., Pratt M., An insight into accountability and politics in universities: A case study, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11, 5, pp. 540-561, (1998); Coy D., Fischer M., Gordon T., Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 1, pp. 1-31, (2001); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Dal Molin M., Turri M., Agasisti T., New public management reforms in the Italian universities: Managerial tools, accountability mechanisms or simply compliance?, International Journal of Public Administration, 40, 3, pp. 256-269, (2017); de Matos Pedro E., Alves H., Leitao J., In search of intangible connections: Intellectual capital, performance and quality of life in higher education institutions, Higher Education, pp. 1-18, (2020); Del Sordo C., Farneti F., Guthrie J., Pazzi S., Siboni B., Social reports in Italian universities: Disclosures and preparers’ perspective, Meditari Accountancy Research, 24, 1, pp. 91-110, (2016); Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Raimo N., Vitolla F., CEO power and integrated reporting, Meditari Accountancy Research, (2020); Garde Sanchez R., Rodriguez Bolivar M.P., Lopez Hernandez A.M., Which are the main factors influencing corporate social responsibility information disclosures on universities’ websites, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 2, (2021); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Hazelkorn E., Reflections on a decade of global rankings: What we've learned and outstanding issues, European Journal of Education, 49, 1, pp. 12-28, (2014); Ismail S., Bakar N.B.A., Reporting practices of Malaysian public universities: The extent of accountability disclosure, African Journal of Business Management, 5, 15, pp. 6366-6376, (2011); James O., Olsen A., Moynihan D., Van Ryzin G., Behavioral public performance: How people make sense of government metrics (elements in public and nonprofit administration), (2020); Jongbloed B., Enders J., Salerno C., Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda, Higher Education, 56, 3, pp. 303-324, (2008); Kallio K.M., Kallio T.J., Tienari J., Hyvonen T., Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities, Human Relations, 69, 3, pp. 685-709, (2016); Krippendorff K., Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, (2004); Leitner K.-H., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Stowasser R., Wagner K., Data envelopment analysis as method for evaluating intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 4, pp. 528-543, (2005); Li J., Pike R., Haniffa R., Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms, Accounting and Business Research, 38, 2, pp. 137-159, (2008); Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J., Nappo F., Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: The case of the University of Bari, Management Decision, 57, 12, pp. 3387-3405, (2019); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 814-835, (2018); Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tiron Tudor A., Zanellato G., Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: A longitudinal analysis, Meditari Accountancy Research, (2020); Marra M., How does evaluation foster accountability for performance? Tracing accountability lines and evaluation impact within the World Bank and the Italian local health-care providers, Making accountability work dilemmas for evaluation and for audit, (2007); Marra M., The ambiguities of performance-based governance reforms in Italy: Reviving the fortunes of evaluation and performance measurement, Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, pp. 173-182, (2018); Marra M., A behavioral design to reform Italy's evaluation policy, American Journal of Evaluation, pp. 1-22, (2020); Michelon G., Parbonetti A., The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure, Journal of Management and Governance, 16, 3, pp. 477-509, (2012); Mouritsen J., Thorbjornsen S., Bukh P.N.D., Johansen M.R., Intellectual capital and new public management: Reintroducing the enterprise, Learning Organization, 11, 4-5, pp. 380-392, (2004); Nicolo G., The rise of intellectual capital disclosure from private to public sector: The case of Italian Public Universities, (2020); Nicolo G., Manes-Rossi F., Christiaens J., Aversano N., Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities, Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 4, pp. 1055-1087, (2020); Ntim C.G., Soobaroyen T., Broad M.J., Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability: The case of UK higher education institutions, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30, 1, pp. 65-118, (2017); Parker L., University corporatisation: Driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions: Operationalising measurement through a strategic prospective lens, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 355-381, (2019); Linee guida per la Relazione annuale sulla performance, (2018); Raimo N., Ricciardelli A., Rubino M., Vitolla F., Factors affecting human capital disclosure in an integrated reporting perspective, Measuring Business Excellence, 24, 4, pp. 575-592, (2020); Ramirez Y., Merino E., Manzaneque M., Examining the intellectual capital web reporting by Spanish Universities, Online Information Review, 43, 5, pp. 775-798, (2019); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish Universities: A new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 5, pp. 701-732, (2019); Rebora G., Turri M., Critical factors in the use of evaluation in Italian universities, Higher Education, 61, 5, pp. 531-544, (2011); Salvi A., Vitolla F., Giakoumelou A., Raimo N., Rubino M., Intellectual capital disclosure in integrated reports: The effect on firm value, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, (2020); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: What has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); ter Bogt H.J., Scapens R.W., Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems, European Accounting Review, 21, 3, pp. 451-497, (2012); Urdari C., Farcas T.V., Tiron-Tudor A., Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: The perspective of international rankings, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8, 2, pp. 191-215, (2017); Vitolla F., Raimo N., Marrone A., Rubino M., The role of board of directors in intellectual capital disclosure after the advent of integrated reporting, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 5, pp. 2188-2200, (2020); Vorely T., Nelles J., (Re) conceptualising the academy: Institutional development of and beyond the third mission, Journal of Higher Education Management and Policy, 20, 3, pp. 119-135, (2008); Welch A., Higher education in Southeast Asia: Blurring borders, changing balance, (2011); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Zhuo H.H., Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDMmodel, Measurement, 45, 5, pp. 856-880, (2012)","G. Nicolò; Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Italy; email: gnicolo@unisa.it","","Elsevier Ltd","","","","","","01497189","","EPPLD","34091396","English","Eval. Program Plann.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85108303659"
"Damar M.; Özdağoğlu G.; Saso L.","Damar, Muhammet (57200527612); Özdağoğlu, Güzin (35218139100); Saso, Luciano (7005488411)","57200527612; 35218139100; 7005488411","Designing a business intelligence-based monitoring platform for evaluating research collaborations within university networks: the case of UNICA - the Network of Universities from the Capitals of Europe.","2022","Information Research","27","4","945","","","","1","10.47989/irpaper945","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144874523&doi=10.47989%2firpaper945&partnerID=40&md5=d31a84010a7ebd5f4311fc290397f5a7","Information Center of Dokuz Eylul University (DEU), Izmir, Turkey; Dokuz Eylul University (DEU), Turkey; Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy","Damar M., Information Center of Dokuz Eylul University (DEU), Izmir, Turkey; Özdağoğlu G., Dokuz Eylul University (DEU), Turkey; Saso L., Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy","Introduction. The scope of the study is to provide decision support for academic networks to reveal the efficiency of the collaborations among the researchers. This research proposes a monitoring environment to evaluate collaboration patterns in all research areas and foster innovative, interdisciplinary, and international research. Method. The paper presents a novel application framework for the Network of the Universities from the Capitals of Europe (UNICA) based on business intelligence. The framework is applied by analysing co-authorships through data from the Web of Science (2015 and 2020). Analysis. Co-authorships between member universities are queried from the large-scale bibliographic data. A new bibliometric data warehouse is created with the integrated use of database operations with text analytics. Dashboards associated with the data warehouse contain many performance indicators and statistics based on interactive filters. Results. The findings cover many features of the monitoring environment and statistics in various research domains (Life Science and Biomedicine, Physical Sciences, Technology, Social Sciences, Arts, and Humanities). User-friendly geographical maps visualized the most significant collaborations in various domains. Conclusions. The study provides an intellectual contribution by revealing the differences in collaboration levels of the research areas and indicating the policy requirements to close these gaps. © 2022, University of Boras. All rights reserved.","","","","","","","","","Abramo G., D'Angelo C. A., Di Costa F., Solazzi M., University-industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination, Technovation, 29, 6-7, pp. 498-507, (2009); Akakandelwa A., Author collaboration and productivity at the University of Zambia, 2002-2007, African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 19, 1, pp. 13-23, (2009); Ardanuy J., Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: The Spanish case, Scientometrics, 90, 3, pp. 877-890, (2012); Benckendorff P., Exploring the limits of tourism research collaboration: A social network analysis of co-authorship patterns in Australian and New Zealand tourism research, CAUTHE 2010. Official proceedings of the 20th annudal CAUTHE conference “Tourism and hospitality: Challenge the limits”, pp. 151-174, (2010); Bjorneborn L., Ingwersen P., Toward a basic framework for webometrics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 14, pp. 1216-1227, (2004); Chen K., Zhang Y., Fu X., International research collaboration: an emerging domain of innovation studies?, Research Policy, 48, 1, pp. 149-168, (2019); Cheng M. Y., Hen K. W., Tan H. P., Fok K. F., Patterns of co-authorship and research collaboration in Malaysia, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65, 6, pp. 659-674, (2013); Chung W., Zeng D., Social‐media‐based public policy informatics: Sentiment and network analyses of US Immigration and border security, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 7, pp. 1588-1606, (2016); Chung W., Chen H., Reid E., Business stakeholder analyzer: An experiment of classifying stakeholders on the Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1, pp. 59-74, (2009); About us, (2022); Cunningham S. J., Dillon S. M., Authorship patterns in information systems, Scientometrics, 39, 1, pp. 19-27, (1997); Daniel B., Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 5, pp. 904-920, (2015); Dunning J., Regions, globalisation & the knowledge-based economy, (2000); Elango B., Rajendran P., Authorship trends and collaboration pattern in the marine sciences literature: a scientometric study, International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2, 3, pp. 166-169, (2012); Elena C., Business intelligence, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics, and Information Technology, 1, 2, pp. 1-12, (2011); Why you need a research information management system (RIMS), (2022); Membership information, (2022); Foley E., Guillemette M. G., What is business intelligence?, International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 1, 4, pp. 1-28, (2010); Garfield E., From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software, Journal of Informetrics, 3, 3, pp. 173-179, (2009); Glanzel W., Schubert A., Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship, Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, pp. 257-277, (2004); Glanzel W., Introduction to bibliometric data sources, Proceedings 2nd International Summer School. Modern trends in science: scientometrics, (2018); Hicks D., Katz J.S., Science policy for a highly collaborative science system, Science and Public Policy, 23, 1, pp. 39-44, (1996); Hood W.W., Wilson C.S., The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics, Scientometrics, 52, 2, pp. 291-314, (2001); Hou H., Kretschmer H., Liu Z., The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics, Scientometrics, 75, 2, pp. 189-202, (2008); Inzelt A., Schubert A., Schubert M., Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions, Scientometrics, 78, 1, pp. 37-43, (2009); Jacobs D., Demystification of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics and webometrics, Proceedings of DLIS 11th Annual Conference “Demistifying and popularising LIS research in modern times, pp. 30-43, (2010); Katz J.S., Martin B.R., What is research collaboration?, Research policy, 26, 1, pp. 1-18, (1997); Khaparde V., Pawar S., Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in Information Technology, Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 1, 1, pp. 46-54, (2013); Khasseh A.A., Soheili F., Chelak A.M., Co-authorship network analysis of iMetrics researchers, Library Philosophy and Practice, (2017); Koseoglu M. A., Okumus F., Putra E. D., Yildiz M., Dogan I. C., Authorship trends, collaboration patterns, and co-authorship networks in lodging studies (1990-2016), Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27, 5, pp. 561-582, (2018); Kumar S., Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67, 1, pp. 55-73, (2015); Lariviere V., Gingras Y., Archambault E., Canadian collaboration networks: a comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities, Scientometrics, 68, 3, pp. 519-533, (2006); Leydesdorff L., Persson O., Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 8, pp. 1622-1634, (2010); Leydesdorff L., Wagner C.S., International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group, Journal of Informetrics, 2, 4, pp. 317-325, (2008); Liu X., Guo C., Zhang L., Scholar metadata and knowledge generation with human and artificial intelligence, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 6, pp. 1187-1201, (2014); Lundberg J., Tomson G., Lundkvist I., Skr J., Brommels M., Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding, Scientometrics, 69, 3, pp. 575-589, (2006); Macfadyen L.P., Dawson S., Pardo A., Gasevic D., Embracing big data in complex educational systems: The learning analytics imperative and the policy challenge, Research & Practice in Assessment, 9, pp. 17-28, (2014); McCoy C., Rosenbaum H., Uncovering unintended and shadow practices of users of decision support system dashboards in higher education institutions, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70, 4, pp. 370-384, (2019); Melin G., Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level, Research policy, 29, 1, pp. 31-40, (2000); Melin G., Persson O., Studying research collaboration using co-authorships, Scientometrics, 36, 3, pp. 363-377, (1996); Miller G., Social scientists wade into the Tweet stream, Science, 333, 2011, pp. 1814-1815, (2011); Mohammadamin E., Ali R. V., Abrizah A., Co-authorship network of scientometrics research collaboration, Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 17, 3, pp. 73-93, (2017); Nikzad M., Jamali H. R., Hariri N., Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study, Library & Information Science Research, 33, 4, pp. 313-319, (2011); Olmeda-Gomez C., Perianes-Rodriguez A., Ovalle-Perandones M.A., Guerrero-Bote V.P., de Moya Anegon F., Visualization of scientific co‐authorship in Spanish universities, Aslib Proceedings, 61, 1, pp. 83-100, (2009); Olsen J. P., Accountability and ambiguity, The Oxford handbook of public accountability, pp. 10-124, (2014); Osinska V., Klimas R., Mapping science: tools for bibliometric and altmetric studies, Information Research, 26, 4, (2021); Ozel C., Ersoy B., Arus O., Akademik değerlendirme ürünleri: InCites ve SciVal, Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 34, 2, pp. 275-284, (2020); Perianes-Rodriguez A., Olmeda-Gomez C., Moya-Anegon F., Detecting, identifying, and visualizing research groups in co-authorship networks, Scientometrics, 82, 2, pp. 307-319, (2010); Pham Q. T., Mai T. K., Misra S., Crawford B., Soto R., Critical success factors for implementing business intelligence system: empirical study in Vietnam, International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 567-584, (2016); Ponomariov B., Boardman C., What is co-authorship?, Scientometrics, 109, 3, pp. 1939-1963, (2016); Popovic A., Coelho P. S., Jaklic J., The impact of business intelligence system maturity on information quality, Information Research, 14, 4, (2009); Pouris A., Ho Y. S., Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa, Scientometrics, 98, 3, pp. 2169-2184, (2014); Rotolo D., Rafols I., Hopkins M. M., Leydesdorff L., Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies: Scientometric overlay mapping, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 1, pp. 214-233, (2017); Schlattmann S., Capturing the collaboration intensity of research institutions using social network analysis, Procedia Computer Science, 106, pp. 25-31, (2017); Schmidt J., Knowledge politics of interdisciplinarity. Specifying the type of interdisciplinarity in the NSF’s NBIC scenario, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20, 4, pp. 313-328, (2007); Sharda R., Delen D., Turban E., Business intelligence and analytics: systems for decision support, (2015); Shotton D., Portwin K., Klyne G., Miles A., Adventures in semantic publishing: Exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article, Plos Computational Biology, 5, 4, (2009); Sivertsen G., Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of research, Springer handbook of science and technology indicators, pp. 667-683, (2019); Skolnikoff E.B., The elusive transformation: science, technology and the evolution of international politics, (1993); Skyrius R., Nemitko S., Talocka G., The emerging role of business intelligence culture, Information Research, 23, 4, (2018); Song X., Chi Y., Hino K., Tseng B., Identifying opinion leaders in the blogosphere, CIMK2007: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 971-974, (2007); Stehr N., Knowledge politics: governing the consequences of science and technology, (2005); Tang L., Shapira P., China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics, Scientometrics, 88, 1, pp. 1-16, (2011); Tsai C.C., Corley E.A., Bozeman B., Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts, Scientometrics, 108, 2, pp. 505-529, (2016); Network of universities from the capitals of Europe, (2021); Velden T., Haque A. U., Lagoze C., A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation, Scientometrics, 85, 1, pp. 219-242, (2010); Wagner C. S., Leydesdorff L., Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 2, pp. 185-208, (2005); Wagner C. S., Whetsell T. A., Mukherjee S., International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination, Research Policy, 48, 5, pp. 1260-1270, (2019); Williamson B., Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments, Journal of Education Policy, 31, 2, pp. 123-141, (2016); Web of Science core collections help: research areas, (2021); Yang S., Yuan Q., Are scientometrics, informetrics, and bibliometrics different?, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2017, pp. 107-1518, (2017); Zeng D., Chen H., Castillo-Chavez C., Lober W.B., Thurmond M., Infectious disease informatics and biosurveillance, (2010); Zhang J., Ackerman M.S., Adamic L., Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms, WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 221-230, (2007)","","","University of Boras","","","","","","13681613","","","","English","Inf. Res.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85144874523"
"Pucci T.; Simoni C.; Zanni L.","Pucci, Tommaso (55824267800); Simoni, Christian (8513137200); Zanni, Lorenzo (26868297700)","55824267800; 8513137200; 26868297700","Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance","2015","Journal of Management and Governance","19","3","","589","616","27","35","10.1007/s10997-013-9278-1","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84933671542&doi=10.1007%2fs10997-013-9278-1&partnerID=40&md5=b2ebbe0059a0e76edae998abf6ded0f0","Department of Business and Law, University of Siena, Piazza San Francesco 8, Siena, 53100, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette, 9, Florence, 50127, Italy","Pucci T., Department of Business and Law, University of Siena, Piazza San Francesco 8, Siena, 53100, Italy; Simoni C., Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette, 9, Florence, 50127, Italy; Zanni L., Department of Business and Law, University of Siena, Piazza San Francesco 8, Siena, 53100, Italy","Although the literature highlights the contribution of different marketing assets to firm performance, it is still far from reaching a consolidated and exhaustive position on this topic. Several authors have, in fact, proposed metrics and performance measurement systems related to marketing strategies, but the relationship between specific marketing resources and overall firm profitability needs further analysis and empirical research. This paper proposes a framework to measure the effect of the use and interaction of different marketing assets on firm performances, through their impact on the level of the firm’s intellectual capital. We test our framework by adopting a quantitative approach, providing evidence from within the Italian children’s clothing industry. Specifically, we measure the intellectual capital using the knowledge capital scorecard method proposed by Lev (Gu and Lev in Intangibles assets. Measurement, drivers, usefulness. New York University, New York, 2001; Seetharaman et al. in J Intellect Cap 3(2):128–148, 2002) and we analyze it by modeling some firm-specific variables such as brands, stores, advertising expenses, the balance sheet’s intangible assets and their interactions. The empirical analysis highlights that: (a) there is a positive direct relationship between a firm’s intellectual capital value and its performance; (b) the combination and interaction of specific marketing resources affect the intellectual capital value. The results show that the intellectual capital value can be used as a synthetic indicator to evaluate the impact of some specific marketing resources on business performance. © 2013, Springer Science+Business Media New York.","Intellectual capital; Marketing assets; Marketing performance; Performance measurement system","","","","","","","","Aboody D., Lev B., Informational asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains, The Journal of Finance, 55, 6, pp. 2747-2766, (2000); Acquaah M., Chi T., A longitudinal analysis of the impact of firm resources and industry characteristics on firm-specific profitability, Journal of Management and Governance, 11, pp. 179-213, (2007); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Basu S., Waymire G., Has the importance of intangibles really grown? and if so, why?, Accounting and Business Research, 38, 3, pp. 171-190, (2008); Bhuian S.N., Mengue B., Bell S.J., Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance, Journal of Business Research, 58, pp. 9-17, (2005); Bolton R.N., Linking marketing to financial performance and firm value, Journal of Marketing, 68, October, pp. 73-75, (2004); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, pp. 433-462, (1999); Bontis N., Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 1, pp. 41-60, (2001); Bontis N., Dragonetti N.C., Jacobsen K., Roos G., The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources, European Management Journal, 17, 4, pp. 391-402, (1999); Brun A., Castelli C., Supply chain strategy in the fashion industry: Developing a portfolio model depending on product, retail channel and brand, International Journal of Production Economics, 116, pp. 169-181, (2008); Bukh P.N., Nielsen C., Gormsen P., Mouritsen J., Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in danish IPO prospectuses, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18, 6, pp. 713-732, (2005); Busacca B., Brand equity, un modello evolutivo, Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 1, pp. 90-123, (2003); Busacca G.A., Maccarrone P., IFRSs and accounting for intangible assets: the Telecom Italia case, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 2, pp. 306-328, (2007); Carpenter J.M., Fairhurst A., Consumer shopping value, satisfaction, and loyalty for retail apparel brands, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9, 3, pp. 256-269, (2005); Carrol A., Brand communications in fashion categories using celebrity endorsement, Brand Management, 17, 2, pp. 146-158, (2008); Carson D., Cromie S., McGowan P., Hill J., Marketing and entrepreneurship in SMEs. An Innovative approach, (1995); Chen M.C., Cheng S.J., Hwang Y., An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 159-176, (2005); Cheng M.-Y., Lin J.-Y., Hsiao T.-Y., Lin T.W., Censoring model for evaluating intellectual capital value drivers, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 4, pp. 639-654, (2008); Clark B.H., Marketing performance measures: History and interrelationships, Journal of Marketing Management, 15, pp. 711-732, (1999); Comboni G., Molteni F., Prodotto Moda e “Isola Stilistica, Economia & Management, 2, pp. 20-29, (1994); Cordazzo M., The impact of IFRS on accounting practices: evidence from Italian listed companies, Working Paper Series, electronic copy available at:, (2009); Corstjens M., Lal R., Building store loyalty through store brands, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp. 281-291, (2000); Competitors. Abbigliamento Infantile, March, (2009); Davey J., Schneider L., Davey H., Intellectual capital disclosure and the fashion industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 3, pp. 401-424, (2009); Day G.S., The capabilities of market-driven organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58, 4, pp. 37-52, (1994); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower, (1997); Fionda A.M., Moore C.M., The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand, Journal of Brand Management, 16, pp. 347-363, (2009); Firer S., Williams S.M., Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 3, pp. 348-360, (2003); Garengo P., Bernardi G., Organizational capability in SMEs. Performance measurement as a key system in supporting company development, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, 5-6, pp. 518-532, (2007); Garengo P., Biazzo S., Bititci U.S., Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 1, pp. 25-47, (2005); Guilding C., Pike R., Intangible marketing assets: A managerial accounting perspective, Accounting and Business Research, 21, 18, pp. 41-49, (1990); Guthrie J., Petty R., Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 3, pp. 241-251, (2000); Han J.K., Kim N., Srivastava R.K., Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation the missing link?, Journal of Marketing, 62, pp. 30-45, (1998); Hilmola O.P., Torkkeli M., Savolainen V.V., Intangibles and business performance—a technical efficiency approach, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 9, 4, pp. 364-379, (2009); Hooley G.J., Greenley G.E., Cadogan J.W., Fahy J., The performance impact of marketing resources, Journal of Business Research, 58, pp. 18-27, (2005); Hudson M., Lean J., Smart P.A., Improving control through effective performance measurement in SMEs, Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 12, 8, pp. 804-813, (2010); Hvolby H.-.H., Thorstenson A., Performance measurement in small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Stimulating Manufacturing Excellence in SMEs. Coventry, 17–19 April, (2000); International financial reporting standards 2008, (2008); Ittner C.D., Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence, Accounting and Business Research, 38, 3, pp. 261-272, (2008); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70, 1, pp. 71-79, (1992); Keller K.L., Busacca B., Ostillio M.C., La gestione del brand. Strategie e sviluppo, (2005); Knott A.M., Bryce D.J., Posen H.E., On the strategic accumulation of intangible assets, Organization Science, 14, 2, pp. 197-207, (2003); Kohli A., Jaworski B.J., Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing, 54, April, (1990); Kurata H., Yue X., Trade promotion mode choice and information sharing in fashion retail supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 114, pp. 507-519, (2008); Labeaga J.M., Lado N., Martos M., Behavioural loyalty towards store brands, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, pp. 347-356, (2007); Lamberti L., Noci G., Marketing strategy and marketing performance measurement system: Exploring the relationship, European Management Journal, 28, pp. 139-152, (2010); Lambin J.J., Market-driven management. Marketing strategico e operativo, quinta ed., (2008); Lapointe A., Cimon Y., Leveraging intangibles: How firms can create lasting value, Journal of Business Strategy, 30, 5, pp. 40-48, (2009); Lev B., Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press (Italian trad. Intangibles. Gestione, valutazione e reporting delle risorse intangibili delle aziende, Milan: ETAS, (2001); Lev B., Intangible assets: Concepts and measurements, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 2, pp. 299-305, (2005); Maisel L.S., Performance measurement practices survey results, (2001); Malerba F., Orsenigo L., Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: Towards a history-friendly model, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 4, pp. 667-704, (2002); Manaresi A., La relazione tra marche e clienti. Un’analisi multisettoriale, (2001); Marr B., Measuring and benchmarking intellectual capital, Benchmarking An International Journal, 11, 6, pp. 559-570, (2004); McAdam R., Quality models in an SME context, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17, pp. 305-323, (2000); Moore M., Doherty A.M., Doyle S.A., Flagship stores as a market entry method: the perspective of luxury fashion retailing, European Journal of Marketing, 44, 1-2, pp. 139-161, (2010); Moore M., Fairhurst A., Marketing capabilities and firm performance in fashion retailing, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7, 4, pp. 386-397, (2003); Morgan N.A., Clark B.H., Gooner R., Marketing productivity, marketing audits, and systems for marketing performance assessment: Integrating multiple perspectives, Journal of Business Research, 55, 5, pp. 363-375, (2002); Morgan N.A., Rego L.L., Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance, Journal of Marketing, 73, 1, pp. 59-74, (2009); Morris M.H., Schindehutte M., LaForge R.W., Entrepreneurial marketing: A construct for integrating emerging entrepreneurship and marketing perspectives, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10, 4, (2002); Narver J.C., Slater F.S., The effect of a market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing, 54, October, pp. 20-35, (1990); Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K., Performance measurement system design. A literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 12, pp. 1228-1263, (2005); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., The knowledge-creating company, (1995); O'Sullivan D., Abela A.V., Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance, Journal of Marketing, 71, April, pp. 79-93, (2007); Olavarrieta S., Friedmann R., Market-oriented culture, knowledge-related resources, reputational assets and superior performance: A conceptual framework, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 7, pp. 215-228, (1999); Piercy N.F., Morgan N.A., The marketing planning process: Behavioral problems compared to analytical techniques in explaining marketing plan credibility, Journal of Business Research, 29, 3, pp. 167-178, (1994); Rumelt R.P., Towards a strategic theory of the firm, Competitive strategic management, pp. 556-571, (1984); Rust R.T., Ambler T., Carpenter G.S., Kumar V., Srivastava R.K., Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions, Journal of Marketing, 68, October, pp. 76-90, (2004); Saviolo S., Testa S., Le imprese del sistema moda. Il management al servizio della creatività, (2005); Seetharaman A., Bin Zaini Sooria H.H., Saravanan A.S., Intellectual capital accounting and reporting in the knowledge economy, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 2, pp. 128-148, (2002); Seggie S.H., Cavusgil E., Phelan S.E., Measurement of return on marketing investment: A conceptual framework and the future of marketing metrics, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp. 834-841, (2007); Shareef F., Davey H., Accounting for intellectual capital: evidence from listed English football clubs, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 7, 3, pp. 78-116, (2005); Sheth J., Sisodia R.S., Sharma A., The antecedents and consequences of customer-centric marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 1, pp. 55-66, (2002); Srivastava R.K., Fahey L., Christensen H.K., The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 27, 6, pp. 777-802, (2001); Srivastava R.K., Tassaduq A., Shervani T.A., Fahey L., Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis, Journal of Marketing, 62, 1, pp. 2-18, (1998); Stewart T., Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations, (1997); Sullivan P.H., Value-driven intellectual capital—how to convert intangible corporate assets into market value, (2000); Sullivan P.H., Sullivan P.H., Valuing intangibles companies: An intellectual capital approach, Journal of Accounting Literature, 8, pp. 328-340, (2000); Sveiby K.E., Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, available at:, (2010); Teece D.J., Pisano G.P., Shuen A., A dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, pp. 509-533, (1997); Testa F., De Vita P., Reti, flessibilità e performance competitive nei settori tradizionali. Un caso di studio nel fashion business, (2006); Van der Meer-Kooistra J., Zijlstra S.M., Reporting on intellectual capital, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14, 4, pp. 456-476, (2001); Vorhies D.W., Harker M., Rao C.P., The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms, European Journal of Marketing, 33, 11-12, pp. 1171-1202, (1999); Vorhies D.W., Morgan N.A., Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage, Journal of Marketing, 69, January, pp. 80-94, (2005); Wernerfelt B., A resource based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171-180, (1984); Wooldridge J.M., Introductory econometrics, A modern approach, (2003)","","","Springer New York LLC","","","","","","13853457","","","","English","J. Manage. Gov.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84933671542"
"Hussain T.; Eskildsen J.; Edgeman R.; Ismail M.; Shoukry A.M.; Gani S.","Hussain, Tajammal (36637417200); Eskildsen, Jacob (6603594829); Edgeman, Rick (7004409301); Ismail, Muhammad (58727613200); Shoukry, Alaa Mohamd (57192378443); Gani, Showkat (57197771451)","36637417200; 6603594829; 7004409301; 58727613200; 57192378443; 57197771451","Imperatives of su stainable university excellence: A conceptual framework","2019","Sustainability (Switzerland)","11","19","5242","","","","20","10.3390/su11195242","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073609069&doi=10.3390%2fsu11195242&partnerID=40&md5=ede7d1cec361a7890bdc6eaa43ccea79","Department of Statistics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, 54000, Pakistan; Management Department, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, 1, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark; Management Department, Fort Hays State University, KS, Hays, 67601, United States; Arriyadh Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia; KSAWorkers University, Cairo, 11311, Egypt; College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Muzahimiyah, 11451, Saudi Arabia","Hussain T., Department of Statistics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, 54000, Pakistan; Eskildsen J., Management Department, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, 1, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark; Edgeman R., Management Department, Fort Hays State University, KS, Hays, 67601, United States; Ismail M., Department of Statistics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, 54000, Pakistan; Shoukry A.M., Arriyadh Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia, KSAWorkers University, Cairo, 11311, Egypt; Gani S., College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Muzahimiyah, 11451, Saudi Arabia","This study envisions the architecture of a modern era university with sustainable standards of excellence. Sustainable University Excellence is herein defined as the ability of a university to excel in the core areas of knowledge creation and dissemination via the mobilization of human, social, intellectual, and financial capital to serve on socioeconomic and environmental fronts ethically, efficiently, and effectively to secure a sustainable future. Seven core performance domains of a university are explored: Teaching quality, research culture, technological capability building, accessibility, community engagement, internationalization, and environment, which should be prioritize in order to continuously advance along a sustainable excellence continuum. This study provides a self-assessment methodology that universities can employ to compare their performance relative to the aforementioned domains, thus enabling the identification of performance gaps, the knowledge of which is crucial to the formulation of more targeted strategy. This approach allows decision makers to form a more coherent vision for sustainability within institutional and broader contexts. The approach proposed herein incorporates the three aspects of sustainability that form the so-called Triple Bottom Line (TBL). © 2019 by the authors.","Community engagement; Internationalization; research culture; Sustainable excellence; Teaching quality; Technological capability","conceptual framework; knowledge; local participation; self assessment; sustainability; teaching; university sector","","","","","Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, (RG-1437-027)","Funding text 1: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no. RG-1437-027.; Funding text 2: Funding: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no. RG-1437-027.","Edgeman R., Eskildsen J., Modeling and assessing sustainable enterprise excellence, Bus. Strategy Environ., 23, pp. 173-187, (2014); Peters M.A., Education Policy in the Age of Knowledge Capitalism, Policy Futures Educ., 1, pp. 361-380, (2003); Massyrova R., Tautenbaeva A., Tussupova A., Zhalalova A., Bissenbayeva Z., Changes in The Higher Education System of Kazakhstan, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 185, pp. 49-53, (2015); Gopal A., Zha Q., Internationalisation of Higher Education and Global Mobility, Educ. Rev., 67, pp. 386-388, (2014); Qiang Z., Internationalization of Higher Education: Towards a Conceptual Framework, Policy Futures Educ., 1, pp. 248-270, (2003); Bauer M., Bormann I., Kummer B., Niedlich S., Rieckmann M., Sustainability governance at universities: Using a governance equalizer as a research heuristic, High. Educ. Policy, 31, pp. 491-511, (2018); Berchin I.I., Grando V.D.S., Marcon G.A., Corseuil L., Guerra J.B.S.O.D.A., Strategies to promote sustainability in higher education institutions: A case study of a federal institute of higher education in Brazil, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 18, pp. 1018-1038, (2017); Chapleo C., Simms C., Stakeholder analysis in higher education, Perspect. Policy Pract. High. Educ., 14, pp. 12-20, (2010); Zuzeviciute V., Praneviciene B., Simanaviciene Z., Vasiliauskiene V., Competence for sustainability: Prevention of dis-balance in higher education: The case of cooperation while educating future law enforcement officers, Montenegrin J. Econ., 13, pp. 121-130, (2017); Azeiteiro U.M., Bacelar-Nicolau P., Caetano F.J.P., Caeiro S., Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: Experiences from portugal, J. Clean. Prod., 106, pp. 308-319, (2015); Archibugi D., Pietrobelli C., The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden?, Technol Forecast. Soc. Chang., 70, pp. 861-883, (2003); Bergsmann E., Schultes M.-T., Winter P., Schober B., Spiel C., Evaluation of competence-based teaching in higher education: From theory to practice, Eval. Program Plan., 52, pp. 1-9, (2015); Boccanfuso D., Larouche A., Trandafir M., Quality of higher education and the labor market in developing countries: Evidence from an education reform in senegal, World Dev., 74, pp. 412-424, (2015); Altbach P.G., The emergence of a field: Research and training in higher education, Stud. High. Educ., 39, pp. 1306-1320, (2014); Hoover E., Harder M.K., What lies beneath the surface? The hidden complexities of organizational change for sustainability in higher education, J. Clean. Prod., 106, pp. 175-188, (2015); Ceulemans K., Molderez I., Van Liedekerke L., Sustainability reporting in higher education: Acomprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research, J. Clean. Prod., 106, pp. 127-143, (2015); Dlouha J., Sustainability-oriented higher education networks: Characteristics and achievements in the context of the UN DESD, J. Clean. Prod., 172, pp. 4263-4276, (2018); Barbulescu A., Quality Culture in the Romanian Higher Education, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 191, pp. 1923-1927, (2015); Fooladvand M., Yarmohammadian M.H., Shahtalebi S., The Application Strategic Planning and Balance Scorecard Modelling in Enhance of Higher Education, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 186, pp. 950-954, (2015); Freeman C., Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-Complementarity and economic growth, Res. Policy, 31, pp. 191-211, (2002); Kruss G., McGrath S., Petersen I.-H., Gastrow M., Higher education and economic development: The importance of building technological capabilities, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 43, pp. 22-31, (2015); Gojkov G., Stojanovic A., Rajic A.G., Critical thinking of students-Indicator of quality in higher education, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 191, pp. 591-596, (2015); Lozano R., Merrill M.Y., Sammalisto K., Ceulemans K., Lozano F.J., Connecting competences and pedagogical approaches for sustainable development in higher education: A literature review and framework proposal; Viegas C.V., Bond A.J., Vaz C.R., Borchardt M., Pereira G.M., Selig P.M., Varvakis G., Critical attributes of sustainability in higher education: A categorisation from literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 126, pp. 260-276, (2016); Reza M.I.H., Sustainability in higher education: Perspectives of malaysian higher education system, SAGE Open, (2016); Grindsted T., Sustainable universities-Fromdeclarations on sustainability in higher education to national law, Environ. Econ., 2, pp. 29-36, (2011); Al-Kharusi S., Murthy S.R., Financial sustainability of private higher education institutions: The case of publicly traded educational institutions, Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov., 14, pp. 25-38, (2017); Alba-Hidalgo D., Benayasdelalamo J., Gutierrez-Perez J., Towards a definition of environmental sustainability evaluation in higher education, High. Educ. Policy, 31, pp. 447-470, (2018); Ariesanti A., Sukoharsono E.G., Irianto G., Saraswati E., Practice of sustainability in higher education, Int. J. Eng. Technol. (UAE), 7, pp. 84-89, (2018); Aleixo A.M., Leal S., Azeiteiro U.M., Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in portugal, J. Clean. Prod., 172, pp. 1664-1673, (2018); Lozano R., Lukman R., Lozano F.J., Huisingh D., Lambrechts W., Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system, J. Clean. Prod., 48, pp. 10-19, (2013); Wright T., The evolution of sustainability declarations in higher education, Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability, pp. 7-19, (2004); Sylvestre P., McNeil R., Wright T., From talloires to turin: A critical discourse analysis of declarations for sustainability in higher education, Sustainability, 5, pp. 1356-1371, (2013); Brito R.M., Rodriguez C., Aparicio J.L., Sustainability in teaching: An evaluation of university teachers and students; Gutierrez D.C., Villegas E.G., The importance of teaching methodology in higher education: A critical look, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 174, pp. 377-382, (2015); Adams R., Martin S., Boom K., University culture and sustainability: Designing and implementing an enabling framework, J. Clean. Prod., 171, pp. 434-445, (2018); Pratt M., Margaritis D., Coy D., Developing a research culture in a university faculty, J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., 21, pp. 43-55, (1999); Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B., Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations, Ambio, 31, pp. 437-440, (2002); Valencia J., Macias J., Valencia A., Formative research in higher education: Some reflections, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 176, pp. 940-945, (2015); Teichler U., Higher education research, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., pp. 862-869, (2015); Jones G.A., Building and strengthening policy research capacity: Key issues in canadian higher education, Stud. High. Educ., 39, pp. 1332-1342, (2014); Biesta G., Allan J., Edwards R., The theory question in research capacity building in education: Towards an agenda for research and practice, Br. J. Educ. Stud., 59, pp. 225-239, (2011); Figueiro P.S., Rauet E., Sustainability in higher education: A systematic review with focus on management education, J. Clean. Prod., 106, pp. 22-33, (2015); Beynaghi A., Moztarzadeh F., Maknoon R., Waas T., Mozafari M., Huge J., Leal Filho W., Towards an orientation of higher education in the post rio + 20 process: How is the game changing, Futures, 63, pp. 49-67, (2014); Adomssent M., Fischer D., Godemann J., Herzig C., Otte I., Rieckmann M., Timm J., Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development-Management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from central and eastern europe, J. Clean. Prod., 62, pp. 1-7, (2014); Milutinovic S., Nikolic V., Rethinking higher education for sustainable development in serbia: An assessment of copernicus charter principles in current higher education practices, J. Clean. Prod., 62, pp. 107-113, (2014); Calitz A., Bosire S., Cullen M., The role of business intelligence in sustainability reporting for south african higher education institutions, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 19, pp. 1185-1203, (2018); Dahlman C.J., Ross-Larson B., Westphal L.E., Managing technological development: Lessons from the newly industrializing countries, World Dev., 15, pp. 759-775, (1987); Koenen A.-K., Dochy F., Berghmans I., A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education., Teach. Teach. Educ., 50, pp. 1-12, (2015); Huisman J., Building organizational capacity: Strategic management in higher education, Stud. High. Educ., 36, pp. 865-867, (2011); Chen C.-F., Sewell G., Strategies for technological development in south korea and taiwan: The case of semiconductors, Res. Policy, 25, pp. 759-783, (1996); Guan J.C., Yam R.C.M., Mok C.K., Ma N., A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on dea models., Eur. J. Oper. Res., 170, pp. 971-986, (2006); Caniglia G., Luederitz C., Gross M., Muhr M., John B., Withycombe Keeler L., von Wehrden H., Laubichler M., Wiek A., Lang D., Transnational collaboration for sustainability in higher education: Lessons from a systematic review, J. Clean. Prod., 168, pp. 764-779, (2017); Walker M., Mkwananzi F., Challenges in accessing higher education: A case study of marginalised young people in one south african informal settlement, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 40, pp. 40-49, (2015); Weerts D.J., Sandmann L.R., Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities, Rev. High. Educ., 32, pp. 73-106, (2008); Bender G., Exploring conceptual models for community engagement at higher education institutions in south africa: Conversation, Perspect. Educ., 26, pp. 81-95, (2008); Le Clus M., Tracking and measuring engagement: A review of the literature, Australas. J. Univ.-Community Engagem., 7, pp. 21-28, (2012); Appe S., Barragan D., Universities, ngos, and civil society sustainability: Preliminary lessons from ecuador, Dev. Pract., 27, pp. 472-486, (2017); Brukardt M.J., Holland B., Percy S.L., Zimpher N., Calling the Question: Is Higher Education Ready to Commit to Community Engagement. AWingspread Statement, (2004); Dostilio L.D., Getkin D., Service-learning as catalyst for integrating community engagement across core academic functions, Community Engagement in Higher Education, pp. 139-160, (2015); Collier M., Connop S., Corcoran A., Crowe P., Nedovic-Budic Z., Pichler-Milanovic N., Rijavec R., Sinclair J., Vandergert P., Varghese J., European university-community partnership-based research on urban sustainability and resilience, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 23, pp. 79-84, (2016); Baker L.R., Prospects and pitfalls of a university-community partnership using jatropha for sustainable rural development in a nigerian community, Community Dev., 49, pp. 50-64, (2018); Simpson J.S., Longing for Justice: Higher Education and Democracy's Agenda, (2014); Noel J., Earwicker D.P., Documenting community engagement practices and outcomes: Insights from recipients of the 2010 carnegie community engagement classification, J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., 19, pp. 33-62, (2015); Awuzie B., Emuze F., Promoting sustainable development implementation in higher education: Universities in south africa, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 18, pp. 1176-1190, (2017); Mosier S., Ruxton M., Sustainability university-community partnerships: Lessons for practitioners and scholars from highly sustainable communities, Environ. Plan. C Politics Space, 36, pp. 479-495, (2018); Wright T.S., Sustainability, internationalization, and higher education, New Dir. Teach. Learn., 2009, pp. 105-115, (2009); Kreber C., Different perspectives on internationalization in higher education, New Dir. Teach. Learn., 2009, pp. 1-14, (2009); Edwards R., Crosling G., Petrovic-Lazarovic S., O'Neill P., Internationalisation of business education: Meaning and implementation, High. Educ. Res. Dev., 22, pp. 183-192, (2003); Lee M.N.N., Restructuring higher education: Public-private partnership, J. Asian Public Policy, 1, pp. 188-198, (2008); Soini K., Jurgilevich A., Pietikainen J., Korhonen-Kurki K., Universities responding to the call for sustainability: A typology of sustainability centres, J. Clean. Prod., 170, pp. 1423-1432, (2018); Stough T., Ceulemans K., Lambrechts W., Cappuyns V., Assessing sustainability in higher education curricula: A critical reflection on validity issues, J. Clean. Prod., 172, pp. 4456-4466, (2018); Sonetti G., Brown M., Naboni E., About the triggering of un sustainable development goals and regenerative sustainability in higher education, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Trencher G., Nagao M., Chen C., Ichiki K., Sadayoshi T., Kinai M., Kamitani M., Nakamura S., Yamauchi A., Yarime M., Implementing sustainability co-creation between universities and society: A typology-based understanding; Shriberg M., Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory, High. Educ. Policy, 15, pp. 153-167, (2002); Filho W.L., Shiel C., Paco A.D., Integrative approaches to environmental sustainability at universities: An overview of challenges and priorities, J. Integr. Environ. Sci., 12, pp. 1-14, (2015); Lopez Y.P., Martin W.F., University mission statements and sustainability performance, Bus. Soc. Rev., 123, pp. 341-368, (2018); Sharp L., Green campuses: The road from little victories to systemic transformation, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 3, pp. 128-145, (2002); Jabareen Y., Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 8, pp. 49-62, (2009); Teslia I., Latysheva T., Development of conceptual frameworks of matrix management of project and programme portfolios, East.-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol., 1, pp. 12-18, (2016); Putarungsi P., Development of conceptual framework and indicators for assessment of power development fund in Thailand, Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., (2018); Bhattacharya N., Lamond J., Proverbs D., Hammond F., Development of conceptual framework for understanding vulnerability of commercial property values towards flooding, Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ., 4, pp. 334-351, (2013); Ghasemi P., Development of conceptual framework for component management competence (behavioural indicators), Int. Bus. Manag., 10, pp. 1237-1240, (2016); Fook C.Y., Best practices of teaching in higher education in united states: A case study, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 46, pp. 4817-4821, (2012); Parpala A., Lindblom-Ylanne S., University teachers' conceptions of good teaching in the units of high-quality education, Stud. Educ. Eval., 33, pp. 355-370, (2007); Deem R., Lucas L., Learning about research: Exploring the learning and teaching/research relationship amongst educational practitioners studying in higher education, Teach. High. Educ., 11, pp. 1-18, (2006); Bullough R.V., Ethical and moral matters in teaching and teacher education, Teach. High. Educ., 27, pp. 21-28, (2011); Graue M.E., Whyte K.L., Karabon A.E., The power of improvisational teaching, Teach. High. Educ., 48, pp. 13-21, (2015); Engin M., Donanci S., Dialogic teaching and ipads in the eap classroom, Comput. Educ., 88, pp. 268-279, (2015); Goggin N.L., Finkenberg M.E., Morrow J.R., Instructional technology in higher education teaching, Quest, 49, pp. 280-290, (1997); Rasiah R.R.V., Transformative higher education teaching and learning: Using social media in a team-based learning environment, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 123, pp. 369-379, (2014); Struyven K., Blieck Y., De Roeck V., The electronic portfolio as a tool to develop and assess pre-service student teaching competences: Challenges for quality, Stud. Educ. Eval., 43, pp. 40-54, (2014); Irby D.M., O'sullivan P.S., Steinert Y., Is it time to recognize excellence in faculty development programs?, Med Teach., 37, pp. 705-706, (2015); Christie D., Menter I., Research capacity building in teacher education: Scottish collaborative approaches, J. Educ. Teach., 35, pp. 337-354, (2009); Sayed Y., Ahmed R., Education quality, and teaching and learning in the post-2015 education agenda, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 40, pp. 330-338, (2015); Leal Filho W., Shiel C., Paco A., Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning, J. Clean. Prod., 133, pp. 126-135, (2016); Akar B., Teaching for citizenship in lebanon: Teachers talk about the civics classroom, Teach. Teach. Educ., 28, pp. 470-480, (2012); Postareff L., Lindblom-Ylanne S., Nevgi A., The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education, Teach. Teach. Educ., 23, pp. 557-571, (2007); Barrett A., Sayed Y., Schweisfurth M., Tikly L., Learning, pedagogy and the post-2015 education and development agenda, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 40, pp. 231-236, (2015); du Plessis A.E., Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders, Int. J. Educ. Res., 72, pp. 89-102, (2015); Akhmetova J.B., Kim A.M., Harnisch D.L., Using mixed methods to study emotional intelligence and teaching competencies in higher education, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 128, pp. 516-521, (2014); du Plessis A.E., Gillies R.M., Carroll A., Out-of-field teaching and professional development: Atransnational investigation across australia and south africa, Int. J. Educ. Res., 66, pp. 90-102, (2014); Webel C., Platt D., The role of professional obligations in working to change one's teaching practices, Teach. Teach. Educ., 47, pp. 204-217, (2015); Winthrop R., Anderson K., Cruzalegui I., A review of policy debates around learning in the post-2015 education and development agenda., Int. J. Educ. Dev., 40, pp. 297-307, (2015); Quimbo M.A.T., Sulabo E.C., Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions, Stud. High. Educ., 39, pp. 1955-1971, (2013); Lee K.-J., Development of boundary-spanning organisations in japanese universities for different types of university-industry collaborations: A resource dependence perspective, Asian J. Technol. Innov., 22, pp. 204-218, (2014); Gehrke S., Kezar A., Unbundling the faculty role in higher education: Utilizing historical, theoretical, and empirical frameworks to inform future research, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 93-150, (2015); Giersch S., McMartin F., Nilsen E., Sheppard S., Weilerstein P., Supporting change in entrepreneurship education: Implementing a program grounded in literature on faculty development and change, J. Eng. Entrep., 6, pp. 58-68, (2015); Bozeman B., Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory, Res. Policy, 29, pp. 627-655, (2000); Carmichael P., Research capacity building in education: The role of digital archives, Br. J. Educ. Stud., 59, pp. 323-339, (2011); Prodan A., Maxim E., Manolescu I., Arustei C.C., Guta A.L., Access to higher education: Influences and possible implications, Procedia Econ. Financ., 20, pp. 535-543, (2015); Cuthill M., A 'civic mission' for the university: Engaged scholarship and community based participatory research, Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Comparative Perspectives, pp. 81-99, (2012); Harwood A.M., Ochs L., Currier D., Duke S., Hammond J., Moulds L., Stout K., Werder C., Communities for growth: Cultivating and sustaining service-learning teaching and scholarship in a faculty fellows program, Mich. J. Community Serv. Learn., 12, pp. 41-45, (2005); Harris J.T., Building community resiliency: The role of university leadership, Metrop. Univ., 20, pp. 5-10, (2015); Rus C.L., Chirica S., Ratiu L., Baban A., Learning organization and social responsibility in romanian higher education institutions, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 142, pp. 146-153, (2014); Glass C.R., O'Neill N., Educational reform related to personal and social responsibility, J. Gen. Educ., 61, pp. 406-432, (2012); Butler B., Soontiens W., Offshoring of higher education services in strategic nets: A dynamic capabilities perspective, J. World Bus., 50, pp. 477-490, (2015); Chen P.-Y., Transnational higher education development and implementation: A review of the offshore programs in vietnam for a university in taiwan, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 182, pp. 482-488, (2015); Findlay A.M., King R., Smith F.M., Geddes A., Skeldon R., World class? An investigation of globalisation, difference and international student mobility, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 37, pp. 118-131, (2012); Little A.W., Green A., Successful globalisation, education and sustainable development, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 29, pp. 166-174, (2009); Kim T., Internationalisation of higher education and global mobility, Comp. Educ., 50, pp. 507-509, (2014); Scott P., International education: Alternatives to the market, Intern. Higher Educat., (2010); Jiang X., Towards the internationalisation of higher education from a critical perspective, J. Further High. Educ., 32, pp. 347-358, (2008); Brandli L.L., Frandoloso M., Tauchen J., Improving the environmental work at university of Passo Fundo, Brazil-Towards an environmental management system, Braz. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 8, pp. 31-54, (2011); Altahat S.M., Atan T., Role of healthy work environments in sustainability of goal achievement; ethical leadership, intention to sabotage, and psychological capital in jordanian universities; Andrades Pena F.J., Larran Jorge M., Muriel de Los Reyes M.J., Analysing the incorporation of sustainability themes into the university curricula: A case study of a spanish public university, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 25, pp. 642-654, (2018); Akins E.E., Giddens E., Glassmeyer D., Gruss A., Hedden M.K., Slinger-Friedman V., Weand M., Sustainability education and organizational change: A critical case study of barriers and change drivers at a higher education institution, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Edgeman R., Sustainable Enterprise Excellence: towards a framework for holistic data-analytics, Corporate Govern., 13, pp. 527-540, (2013); Edgeman R., Strategic resistance for sustaining enterprise relevance: A paradigm for sustainable enterprise excellence, resilience and robustness, Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag., 64, pp. 318-333, (2015); Aleksejeva L., Country's competitiveness and sustainability: Higher education impact, J. Secur. Sustain. Issues, 5, pp. 355-363, (2016); Ambros M., Biberhofer P., Fostering higher education for sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: The case knowledge platform, Gaia, 27, pp. 185-187, (2018); Zutshi A., Creed D.A., Declaring talloires: Profile of sustainability communications in australian signatory universities, J. Clean. Prod., 187, pp. 687-698, (2018); Li F., Zhang S., Jin Y., Sustainability of university technology transfer: Mediating effect of inventor's technology service; DeMillo R.A., Young A.J., Revolution in Higher Education: How a Small Band of Innovators Will Make College Accessible and Affordable, (2015); Edgeman R., Complex Management Systems and the Shingo Model: Foundations of Operational Excellence and Supporting Tools, (2019)","T. Hussain; Department of Statistics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, 54000, Pakistan; email: tajammal@cuilahore.edu.pk","","MDPI","","","","","","20711050","","","","English","Sustainability","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85073609069"
"Chau V.S.; Gilman M.; Serbanica C.","Chau, Vinh Sum (15755286300); Gilman, Mark (7005837753); Serbanica, Cristina (56002512400)","15755286300; 7005837753; 56002512400","Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer","2017","Technological Forecasting and Social Change","123","","","199","209","10","50","10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.013","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961956268&doi=10.1016%2fj.techfore.2016.03.013&partnerID=40&md5=11a569745e218d17a3be5e88eaf01c1e","Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7PE, Kent, United Kingdom; Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B42 2SU, United Kingdom; Constantin Brancoveanu University, Calea Bascovului nr. 2A, Pitesti, Arges, Romania","Chau V.S., Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7PE, Kent, United Kingdom; Gilman M., Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B42 2SU, United Kingdom; Serbanica C., Constantin Brancoveanu University, Calea Bascovului nr. 2A, Pitesti, Arges, Romania","In the UK, the boundary spanning role has taken on greater significance as successive governments emphasize how universities should play in direct knowledge transfer and changing academics' visions over third mission functions. Studies in the UK have focused on the relative performance of technology transfer organizations (TTOs)/knowledge transfer organizations (KTOs) or their use by academics and external organizations. Compared to their US and international counterparts, TTOs/KTOs at UK universities exhibit low-levels of absolute efficiency. Therefore questions remain relating to how to raise the efficiency and productivity of these units, how to attract and train staff with suitable qualifications/capabilities and how to change adverse attitudes towards knowledge exchange by some academics. Currently, there is a lack of a holistic view of these functions and the way they complement each other or coordinate their activities. This study addresses this gap in theory and practise and advances how universities should provide consistency in both the internal and the external interfaces, by the offer of a framework and key stakeholder insights. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.","Boundary units in universities; Instrumental case study; Knowledge transfer offices; Organizational alignment; University–industry interactions","United Kingdom; United States; Binary alloys; Knowledge management; Technology transfer; Boundary unit in university; Boundary units; Case-studies; Instrumental case study; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge transfer office; Organisational; Organizational alignment; Transfer offices; University/industry interaction; academic performance; human capital; knowledge; organizational framework; productivity; stakeholder; university sector; Efficiency","","","","","European Social Fund, ESF, (POSDRU/1.5/S/59184)","This work was financed by the European Social Fund through The Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007–2013, project number POSDRU/1.5/S/59184 , Performance and excellence in postdoctoral research in Romanian economic science domain. ","Abreu M., Grinevich V., Hughes A., Kitson M., Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, (2009); Agrawal A., University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions, Int. J. Manag. Rev., 3, 4, pp. 285-302, (2001); Aldrich H., Herker D., Boundary spanning roles and organization structure, Acad. Manag. Rev., 2, 2, pp. 217-230, (1977); Allen T.J., Cohen S.I., Information flow in research and development laboratories, Adm. Sci. Q., 14, pp. 12-19, (1969); Ankrah S.N., Burgess T.F., Grimshaw P., Shaw N.E., Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: what single-group studies of motives omit, Technovation, 33, 2-3, pp. 50-65, (2013); Arvanitis S., Kubli U., Woerter M., University–industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: what university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises, Res. Policy, 37, pp. 1865-1883, (2008); Asan S.S., Tanyas M., Integrating hoshin kanri and the balanced scorecard for strategic management: the case of higher education, Total Qual. Manag., 18, 9, pp. 999-1014, (2007); Bekkers R., Bodas Freitas I.M., Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what extent do sectors also matter?, Res. Policy, 37, pp. 1837-1853, (2008); Berbegal-Mirabent J., Sabate F., Canabate A., Brokering knowledge from universities to the marketplace: the role of knowledge transfer offices, Manag. Decis., 50, 7, pp. 1285-1307, (2012); Boardman C., Government centrality to university–industry interactions: university research centres and the industry involvement of academic researchers, Res. Policy, 38, pp. 1505-1516, (2009); Bodas Freitas I.M., Marques R.A., Silva E.M.P., University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries, Res. Policy, 42, pp. 443-453, (2013); Booz R.J., Lewis L.K., Facilitating technology transfer among organizations: an applied communication strategy concept for organizational boundary spanners, J. Technol. Transfer., 22, 1, pp. 35-46, (1997); Bozeman B., Boardman C., Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community, (2003); Brion S., Chauvet V., Chollet B., Mothe C., Project leaders as boundary spanners: relational antecedents and performance outcomes, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 30, pp. 708-722, (2012); Bruneel J., D'Este P., Salter A., Neely A., Searching for Talent and Technology: Examining the Attitudes of EPSRC Industrial Collaborators Towards Universities, 2009, (2009); Bui H.T.M., Baruch Y., Chau V.S., He H., Team learning: the missing construct from a cross-cultural examination of higher education, Asia Pac. J. Manag., 33, 1, pp. 29-51, (2016); Chapple W., Lockett A., Siegel D., Wright M., Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence, Res. Policy, 34, 3, pp. 369-384, (2005); Chau V.S., Witcher B.J., Longitudinal tracer studies: research methodology of the middle range, Br. J. Manag., 16, 4, pp. 343-355, (2005); Chin Y.W., Lim K.T., Networking and knowledge transfer in Malaysian SMEs through university–industry engagement and the state, Copenhagen, J. Asian Stud., 30, 1, pp. 96-116, (2012); Chung C.J., An analysis of the status of the triple helix and university–industry–government relationships in Asia, Scientometrics, 99, pp. 139-149, (2014); Cohen W., Levinthal D., Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Adm. Sci. Q., 35, 1, pp. 128-152, (1990); Cosh A., Hughes A., Lester R., (2006); Creswell J., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Approaches, (2007); De Silva M., Academic entrepreneurship and traditional academic duties: synergy or rivalry?, Stud. High. Educ., (2015); Eisenhardt K.M., Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 4, pp. 532-550, (1989); European Commission, Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe. Voluntary guidelines for universities and other research institutions to improve their links with industry across Europe’, Brussels, Belgium, SEC(2007)449, (2007); Fernandez-Esquinas M., Pinto H., Yruela M.P., Pereira T.S., Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: latent dimensions and determinants of university–industry interactions in peripheral innovation systems, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 113 Part B, pp. 266-279, (2016); Gilman M., Serbanica C., University–industry linkages in the UK. A review of current issues, Kent Business School Working Papers Series, (2012); Glaser B., Remodelling grounded theory, Grounded Theory Rev. Int. J., 4, 1, pp. 1-24, (2004); HEFCE, Higher Education Innovation Funding 2011-15: consultation on a threshold allocation; and indicative institutional allocations, (2011); HEFCE, HEIF4 round four. Invitation and guidance for institutional strategies, (2008); Hewitt-Dundas N., Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities, Res. Policy, 41, 2, pp. 262-275, (2012); Hotho J.J., Becker-Ritterspeach F., Saka-Helmhout A., Enriching absorptive capacity through social interaction, Br. J. Manag., (2011); Howells J., Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Res. Policy, 35, pp. 715-728, (2006); Howells J., Nedeva M., Georghiou L., ‘Industry — Academic Links in the UK’, HEFCE Ref 98/70), (1998); Huggins R., Johnston A., The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective, Environ. Plan. C: Govern. Pol., 27, 6, pp. 1088-1106, (2009); Huggins R., Johnston A., Stride C., Knowledge networks and universities: locational and organizational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions, Entrep. Reg. Dev., 24, 7-8, pp. 475-502, (2012); Ivanova I.A., Leydesdorff L., Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a triple helix of university–industry–government relations, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 86, pp. 143-156, (2014); Johnson H.T., Kaplan R., Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, (1987); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance, Harv. Bus. Rev., 71-79, (1992); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Putting the balanced scorecard to work, Harv. Bus. Rev., 134-142, (1993); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harv. Bus. Rev., 74, 1, pp. 75-85, (1996); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies, (2006); Kitson M., University–industry knowledge exchange: demand pull, supply push and the public space role of higher education institution, Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-171-25-0018, (2009); Lambert R., Lambert Review of Business–Industry Collaboration, (2003); Lawton Smith H., Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence, Environ. Plan. C Gov. Pol., 25, pp. 98-114, (2007); Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.C., Naturalistic Inquiry, (1985); Lock D., UNICO salary and incentives survey 2007/08, (2009); Lockett A., Wright M., Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, Res. Policy, 34, pp. 1043-1057, (2005); Malik T.H., National institutional differences and cross-border university–industry knowledge transfer, Res. Policy, 42, pp. 776-787, (2013); Nielsen C., Cappelen K., Exploring the mechanisms of knowledge transfer in university–industry collaborations: a study of companies, students and researchers, High. Educ. Q., 68, 4, pp. 375-393, (2014); Owens S., Petts J., Bulkeley H., Boundary work: knowledge, policy and the urban environment, Environ. Plan. C Gov. Pol., 24, 5, pp. 633-643, (2006); PACEC/CBR, Evaluation of the effectiveness and role of HEFCE/OSI third stream funding, Report to HEFCE by PACEC and the Centre for Business Research, (2009); PACEC/CBR, Understanding the knowledge exchange infrastructure in the English higher education sector, Report to HEFCE by PACEC and the Centre for Business Research, (2011); Piccaluga A., Balderi C., Patrono A., The Proton Europe Seventh Annual Survey Report (FY 2009), Report Produced by the Institute of Management, Scuola Superiora Sant'Anna (Pisa, Italy) for Proton Europe, (2011); Rossi F., Rosli A., Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: evidence from the United Kingdom, Stud. High. Educ., 40, 10, pp. 1970-1991, (2015); Schofield T., Critical success factors for knowledge transfer collaborations between university and industry, J. Res. Adm., 44, 2, pp. 38-56, (2013); Serbanica C.M., Constantin D.L., Dragan G., University–industry knowledge transfer and network patterns in Romania: does knowledge supply fit SMEs' regional profiles?, Eur. Plan. Stud., 23, 2, pp. 292-310, (2015); Sharifi H., Liu W., Emerging landscape. A study of UK university knowledge transfer systems management, AIM White Paper, (2010); Siegel D.S., Wright M., Chapple W., Lockett A., Assessing the relative performance of University Technology transfer in the US and UK: a stochastic distance function approach, Econ. Innov. New Technol., 17, 7-8, pp. 717-729, (2008); Strauss A., Corbin J., Basics of Qualitative Research, (1990); Tushman M., Special boundary roles in the innovation process, Adm. Sci. Q., 22, 4, pp. 587-605, (1977); Tushman M., Katz R., External communication and project performance: an investigation into the role of gatekeepers, Manag. Sci., 26, 11, pp. 1071-1085, (1980); Tushman M., Scanlan T., Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents, Acad. Manag. J., 24, 2, pp. 289-305, (1981); Tushman M., Scanlan T., Characteristics of external orientations of boundary spanning individuals, Acad. Manag. J., 24, 1, pp. 83-98, (1981); Von Hippel E., The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Res. Policy, 5, pp. 212-239, (1976); Witcher B.J., Butterworth R., What is Hoshin Kanri? A Review, Economic and Social Research Council Innovation Programme, (1999); Witcher B.J., Butterworth R., Hoshin kanri: how Xerox manages, Long Range Plan., 23, 2, pp. 323-332, (1999); Witcher B.J., Butterworth R., Hoshin kanri: policy management in Japanese-owned UK subsidiaries, J. Manag. Stud., 38, 5, pp. 651-674, (2001); Witcher B.J., Chau V.S., Balanced scorecard and hoshin kanri: dynamic capabilities for managing strategic fit, Manag. Decis., 45, pp. 518-538, (2007); Witcher B.J., Chau V.S., Varieties of capitalism and strategic management: managing performance in multinationals after the global financial crisis, Br. J. Manag., 23, pp. S58-S73, (2012); Witcher B.J., Chau V.S., Harding P., Dynamic capabilities: top executive audits and hoshin kanri at Nissan South Africa, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 28, pp. 540-561, (2008); Ye F.Y., Yu S.S., Leydesdorff L., The triple helix of university–industry–government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 64, 11, pp. 2317-2325, (2013); Zhao Z.J., Anand J., Beyond boundary spanners: the ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge, Strateg. Manag. J., 34, pp. 1513-1530, (2013)","V.S. Chau; Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7PE, United Kingdom; email: V.S.Chau@kent.ac.uk","","Elsevier Inc.","","","","","","00401625","","","","English","Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-84961956268"
"Arena C.; Catuogno S.; Crisci A.; Naciti V.","Arena, Claudia (56661933600); Catuogno, Simona (56662106700); Crisci, Anna (55557841000); Naciti, Valeria (57210146372)","56661933600; 56662106700; 55557841000; 57210146372","The mediating role of relational capital for the academic performance effect of IC: the influence of digital technologies","2022","Meditari Accountancy Research","30","4","","1050","1076","26","3","10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1209","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85118663587&doi=10.1108%2fMEDAR-02-2021-1209&partnerID=40&md5=037e0f350d2ed3a7e5fd2baca25ab8f3","Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Department of Economics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy","Arena C., Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Catuogno S., Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Crisci A., Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Naciti V., Department of Economics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy","Purpose: Different mechanisms allow intellectual capital (IC) to affect performance. This paper aims to analyze the value of relations for the academic performance effect of IC and explore how the university’s reliance on digital technologies facilitates the contribution of IC to the overall academic performance. Design/methodology/approach: The authors develop a model linking elements of IC to academic performance in the form of teaching, research and entrepreneurial activity. The model is centered on relational capital (RC) that is supposed to directly fuel performance and mediate the link between the other two IC dimensions and performance. From a methodological point of view, the authors base the empirical investigation on a sample of Italian public universities and applied structural equation modeling to test the mediation and a group comparison to disentangle the effect of universities’ digitalization. Findings: The authors find a significant and positive effect of RC on performance. RC fully mediates the relationship between structural capital and academic performance, whereas it only partially mediates the link between human capital and academic performance. The authors also suggest that digital technologies guide the prominence of the relationship in the university’s ability to fulfill teaching, research and entrepreneurship missions through IC. Originality/value: This study offers a representation of how the relational dimension of IC is the mean through which the stock of knowledge inside IC can be translated into entrepreneurial, education and research achievements and how digital technologies are essential for the exploitation of the performance effect of IC in the digital era. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Digital technologies; Performance; Relational capital; Universities","","","","","","Italian interuniversity Consortium; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, MIUR","We identify three variables to assess academic performance associated with teaching, research and entrepreneurial mission. Following we capture the teaching performance (Teaching) with graduated students for each university and the average duration of studies (; ). Data were retrieved from ALMALAUREA, the Italian interuniversity Consortium funded by the Italian MIUR. ","Aisyah R.A., Sukoco B.M., Anshori M., The effect of relational capital on performance: knowledge sharing as mediation variables in supplier and buyer relation, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 34, 2, pp. 211-232, (2019); Albertini E., An inductive typology of the interrelations between different components of intellectual capital, Management Decision, 54, 4, pp. 887-901, (2016); Alcaniz L., Gomez-Bezares F., Roslender R., Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: a backward look and a proposal for going forward, Accounting Forum, 35, 2, pp. 104-117, (2011); Amato S., Esposito Vinzi V., Tenenhaus M., A global goodness-of-fit for PLS structural equation modelling. Oral communication to PLS club, HEC School of Management, (2004); Ansell C., Sorensen E., Torfing J., The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems, Public Management Review, 23, 7, pp. 1-12, (2020); Arena C., Catuogno S., Vigano R., Intellectual capital and missions of universities: an interpretative model, Azienda Pubblica, 4, pp. 59-83, (2020); Asiaei K., Jusoh R., A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance, Management Decision, 53, 3, pp. 668-697, (2015); Bell D., The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, (1973); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., National intellectual capital index: a united nations initiative for the arab region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 1, pp. 13-39, (2004); Bontis N., Chen M., Cheng S., Hwang Y., An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 159-176, (2005); Brennan M.C., McGowan P., Academic entrepreneurship: an exploratory case study, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 12, 3, pp. 144-164, (2006); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in european universities: do they go hand in hand?, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, pp. 51-71, (2019); Bucheli V., Diaz A., Calderon J.P., Lemoine P., Valdivia J.A., Villaveces J.L., Zarama R., Growth of scientific production in colombian universities: an intellectual capital-based approach, Scientometrics, 91, 2, pp. 369-382, (2012); Bueno E., Paz Salmador M., Rodriguez O., The role of social capital in today's economy: empirical evidence and proposal of a new model of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 4, pp. 556-574, (2004); Castells M., The Information Age, 98, (1996); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: a structural modelling perspective from North Indian universities, International Journal of Educational Development, 56, pp. 52-61, (2017); Chen C.J., Huang J.W., How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management – the social interaction perspective, International Journal of Information Management, 27, 2, pp. 104-118, (2007); Chen J., Zhu Z., Yuan Xie H., Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 1, pp. 195-212, (2004); Chi P.S., Glanzel W., Comparison of citation and usage indicators in research assessment in scientific disciplines and journals, Scientometrics, 116, 1, pp. 537-554, (2018); Crespi G., D'Este P., Fontana R., Geuna A., The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer, Research Policy, 40, 1, pp. 55-68, (2011); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: evidence from colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Dahiyat S.E., An integrated model of knowledge acquisition and innovation: examining the mediation effects of knowledge integration and knowledge application, International Journal of Learning and Change, 8, 2, pp. 101-135, (2015); Dakhli M., DeClercq D., Human capital, social capital and innovation: a multi country study, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 2, pp. 107-128, (2004); Dameri R.P., Ferrando P.M., Implementing integrated reporting to disclose intellectual capital in health organisations: a case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 2, pp. 311-336, (2020); de Frutos-Belizon J., Martin-Alcazar F., Sanchez-Gardey G., An intellectual capital approach to explaining the determinants of scientific productivity in the field of management, European Management Review, 17, 4, pp. 943-959, (2020); de Matos Pedro E., Alves H., Leitao J., In search of intangible connections: intellectual capital, performance and quality of life in higher education institutions, Higher Education, pp. 18-11, (2020); Di Berardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Dillon W.R., Goldstein M., Multivariate analysis methods and applications, (1984); Dumay J., Bernardi C., Guthrie J., La Torre M., Barriers to implementing the international integrated reporting framework: a contemporary academic perspective, Meditari Accountancy Research, 25, 4, pp. 461-480, (2017); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Rooney J., Being critical about intellectual capital accounting in 2020: an overview, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 70, (2020); Dyer J.H., Singh H., The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 4, pp. 660-679, (1998); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual capital. Realizing your companys true value by finding its, (1997); Eriksmo A., Sundberg J., Digital academia: how higher education is affected by digital technology, (2016); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a university, Paper presented at Conference on the Trends in the Management of Human Resources in Higher Education, (2005); Feng H.I., Chen C.S., Wang C.H., Chiang H.C., The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer, The Service Industries Journal, 32, 6, pp. 899-917, (2012); Fernandez-Olmos M., Diaz-Vial I., Malorgio G., Empirical approach to the sequential relationships between generation, relational capital and performance in family wineries in Spain, International Journal of Wine Business Research, 33, 1, pp. 118-133, (2020); Fitzgerald M., Kruschwitz N., Bonnet D., Welch M., Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative, MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 2, pp. 1-16, (2014); F-Jardon C.M., Susana Martos M., Intellectual capital and performance in wood industries of Argentina, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 4, pp. 600-616, (2009); Giones F., Brem A., Digital technology entrepreneurship: a definition and research agenda, Technology Innovation Management Review, 7, 5, (2017); Greenstein S., Lerner J., Stern S., Digitization, innovation, and copyright: what is the agenda?, Strategic Organization, 11, 1, pp. 110-121, (2013); Guerrero-Baena M.D., Gomez-Limon J.A., Fruet J.V., A multicriteria method for environmental management system selection: an intellectual capital approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, pp. 428-437, (2015); Guthrie J., Dumay J., New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 258-266, (2015); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-82, (2012); Hair F., SarstedtHopkins J., G. Kuppelwieser V., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research, European Business Review, 26, 2, pp. 106-121, (2014); Heckman J.J., Stixrud J., Urzua S., The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior, Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 3, pp. 411-482, (2006); Hsu I.C., Sabherwal R., Relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge management: an empirical investigation, Decision Sciences, 43, 3, pp. 489-524, (2012); Huang Y., Jim Wu Y., Intellectual capital and knowledge productivity: the Taiwan biotech industry, Management Decision, 48, 4, pp. 580-599, (2010); Hussinki H., Ritala P., Vanhala M., Kianto A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 904-922, (2017); Iacoviello G., Bruno E., Cappiello A., A theoretical framework for managing intellectual capital in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 33, 5, pp. 919-938, (2019); Kamukama N., Ahiauzu A., Ntayi J.M., Intellectual capital and performance: testing interaction effects, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 4, pp. 554-574, (2010); Khalique M., Bontis N., Shaari J.A.N.B., Yaacob M.R., Ngah R., Intellectual capital and organisational performance in malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual capital, 15, 1, pp. 20-36, (2018); Kohtamaki M., Vesalainen J., Henneberg S., Naude P., Ventresca M.J., Enabling relationship structures and relationship performance improvement: the moderating role of relational capital, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 8, pp. 1298-1309, (2012); Krabel S., Mueller P., What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of max planck society scientists, Research Policy, 38, 6, pp. 947-956, (2009); Kryukov V., Gorin A., Digital technologies as education innovation at universities, The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21, 3, (2016); La Torre M., Botes V.L., Dumay J., Rea M.A., Odendaal E., The fall and rise of intellectual capital accounting: new prospects from the big data revolution, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 381-399, (2018); Lazzeretti L., Capone F., Innocenti N., Exploring the intellectual structure of creative economy research and local economic development: a co-citation analysis, European Planning Studies, 25, 10, pp. 1693-1713, (2017); Lee S.H., Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7, pp. 4941-4947, (2010); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Lin S., Huang Y., The role of social capital in the relationship between human capital and career mobility: moderator or mediator?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 191-205, (2005); Lombardi R., Secundo G., The digital transformation of corporate reporting – a systematic literature review and avenues for future research, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 5, (2020); Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J., Nappo F., Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: the case of the university of Bari, Management Decision, 57, 12, pp. 3387-3405, (2019); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Lu W.M., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modelling, 29, 4, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); Madhok A., Tallman S.B., Resources, transactions and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships, Organization Science, 9, 3, pp. 326-339, (1998); Marquez-Ramos L., Does digitalization in higher education help to bridge the gap between academia and industry? An application to COVID-19, Industry and Higher Education, (2021); Marr B., Gupta O., Pike S., Roos G., Intellectual capital and knowledge management effectiveness, Management Decision, 41, 8, pp. 771-781, (2003); Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Where there is a will there is a way: IC, strategic intent, diversification and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 490-517, (2015); Massaro M., Mas F.D., Bontis N., Gerrard B., Intellectual capital and performance in temporary teams, Management Decision, 58, 3, pp. 410-427, (2019); Molodchik M., Paklina S., Parshakov P., Digital relational capital of a company, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 443-462, (2018); Mouritsen J., Nikolaj Bukh P., Marr B., Reporting on intellectual capital: why what and how?, Measuring Business Excellence, 8, 1, pp. 46-54, (2004); Naciti V., Cesaroni F., Pulejo L., Corporate governance and sustainability: a review of the existing literature, Journal of Management and Governance, pp. 1-20, (2021); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Nambisan S., Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 6, pp. 1029-1055, (2017); Ndou V., Secundo G., Dumay J., Gjevori E., Understanding intellectual capital disclosure in online media big data: an exploratory case study in a university, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 499-530, (2018); O'Flynn J., Confronting the big challenges of our time: making a difference during and after COVID-19, Public Management Review, pp. 1-20, (2020); Oppong G.Y.S., Singh S., Kujur F., Potential of digital technologies in academic entrepreneurship – a study, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 26, 7, pp. 1449-1476, (2020); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Paoloni P., Cesaroni F.M., Demartini P., Relational capital and knowledge transfer in universities, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 1, pp. 185-201, (2019); Paoloni M., Coluccia D., Fontana S., Solimene S., Knowledge management, intellectual capital and entrepreneurship: a structured literature review, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 8, pp. 1797-1818, (2020); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., Back to the future of intellectual capital research: a systematic literature review, Management Decision, 56, 11, pp. 2502-2583, (2018); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Potter J., McDougall J., Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies, (2017); The impact of the coronavirus on global higher education, (2020); Ramadan B.M., Dahiyat S.E., Bontis N., Al-Dalahmeh M.A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 437-462, (2017); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Manzaneque-Lizano M., The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: empirical evidence from Spanish universities, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13, 1, pp. 31-44, (2015); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Santos Penalver J.F., Tejada Ponce A., Intellectual capital in spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Baidez A., Intellectual capital and transparency in universities: an empirical study, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 9, 9, pp. 3021-3029, (2015); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities: a new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Ramirez Y., Manzaneque M., Priego A.M., Formulating and elaborating a model for the measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish public universities, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83, 1, pp. 149-176, (2017); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Sanchez M.P., Determinants of online intellectual capital disclosure by spanish local governments, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2020); Rippa P., Secundo G., Digital academic entrepreneurship: the potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, pp. 900-911, (2019); Saiani P.P., L’università nel contesto italiano. Linee per la valutazione, Quaderni di Sociologia, 1, 35, pp. 59-80, (2004); Salinas-Avila J., Abreu-Ledon R., Tamayo-Arias J., Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 1053-1084, (2020); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital and digital technologies in academic entrepreneurship, Intellectual capital in the Digital Economy, (2020); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Secundo G., Rippa P., Cerchione R., Digital academic entrepreneurship: a structured literature review and avenue for a research agenda, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, (2020); Secundo G., Vecchio P.D., Passiante G., Creating innovative entrepreneurial mindsets as a lever for knowledge-based regional development, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 6, 4, pp. 276-298, (2015); Secundo G., Ndou V., Del Vecchio P., De Pascale G., Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: a structured literature review and future research agenda, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, (2020); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 229-239, (2017); Secundo G., De Beer C., Schutte C.S.L., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve european universities’ competitiveness: the technology transfer offices’ role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Dumay J., Passiante G., Intellectual capital in the age of big data: establishing a research agenda, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 242-261, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Sharabati A.A., Naji Jawad S., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision, 48, 1, pp. 105-131, (2010); Shih K., Chang C., Lin B., Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 74-89, (2010); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Silvestri A., Veltri S., The intellectual capital report within universities: comparing experiences, The Annals of University of Oradea, Economic Sciences, 20, pp. 626-632, (2011); Sr A.S., Costa A.D., Are women more ethical than men?, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 859-871, (1994); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Toniolo K., Masiero E., Massaro M., Bagnoli C., A grounded theory study for digital academic entrepreneurship, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 26, 7, pp. 1567-1587, (2020); Tseng K.A., Lan Y.W., Lu H.C., Chen P.Y., Mediation of strategy on intellectual capital and performance, Management Decision, 51, 7, pp. 1488-1509, (2013); Velasquez R.M.A., Lara J.V.M., Knowledge management in two universities before and during the COVID-19 effect in Peru, Technology in Society, 64, (2021); Veltri S., Bronzetti G., Dumay J., Intellectual capital reporting: a knowledge tool to coordinate a group of regional non-profit organisations, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 8, 4, pp. 313-333, (2017); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Vorbach S., Poandl E.M., Korajman I., Digital entrepreneurship education: the role of MOOCs, International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 9, 3, pp. 99-111, (2019); Wang Z., Wang N., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); Welbourne T.M., Pardo-del-Val M., Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration, Group Decision and Negotiation, 18, 5, pp. 483-497, (2009); Wold H., Nonlinear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) modeling: some current developments, Multivariate Analysis II, Proceedings of an International Symposium on Multivariate Analysis held at Wright State University, Dayton, OH, June 19-24, 1972, pp. 383-407, (1973); Wold H., Soft modelling by latent variables: the non-linear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) approach, Journal of Applied Probability, 12, 1, pp. 117-142, (1975); Wold H., Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions, Systems under Indirect Observations: Causality, Structure, Prediction. Part 2, pp. 1-54, (1982); Yeh L.T., Tseng M.L., Lim M.K., Assessing the carry-over effects of both human capital and organizational forgetting on sustainability performance using dynamic data envelopment analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, (2020); Zhou Y., Fan X., Son J., How and when matter: exploring the interaction effects of high‐performance work systems, employee participation, and human capital on organizational innovation, Human Resource Management, 58, 3, pp. 253-268, (2019); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a university, Trabajo presentado en Trends in the management of human resources in higher education, (2005); Phusavat K., Comepa N., Sitko-Lutek A., Ooi K., Interrelationships between intellectual capital and performance: empirical examination, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111, 6, pp. 810-829, (2011); Ramirez A., Zhang S., McGrew C., Lin S.F., Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction revisited: a comparison of participant–observer perspectives, Communication Monographs, 74, 4, pp. 492-516, (2007); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in spanish universities: a new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016)","C. Arena; Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; email: claudia.arena@unina.it","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","2049372X","","","","English","Meditari Account. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85118663587"
"Zhang M.; Lettice F.; Pawar K.","Zhang, Min (55801329700); Lettice, Fiona (13907473300); Pawar, Kulwant (7003327784)","55801329700; 13907473300; 7003327784","Effects of intellectual capital and university knowledge in indigenous innovation: evidence from Indian SMEs","2019","Production Planning and Control","30","10-12","","799","812","13","9","10.1080/09537287.2019.1582090","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85068230733&doi=10.1080%2f09537287.2019.1582090&partnerID=40&md5=027ddc2bffcddcc447853761653cc02b","Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Centre for Concurrent Enterprise, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham-Ningbo China, Ningbo, China","Zhang M., Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Lettice F., Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Pawar K., Centre for Concurrent Enterprise, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham-Ningbo China, Ningbo, China","Intellectual capital and collaboration with universities are vital knowledge management practices for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to innovate and improve the effectiveness of their operations. This study investigates empirically the impacts of intellectual capital and university knowledge on indigenous innovation and how business and institutional environments affect the relationships. The research model is tested using moderated regression analysis and data collected from 150 SMEs in India. The results show that intellectual capital and university knowledge improve indigenous innovation, both individually and interactively. The effect of intellectual capital in indigenous innovation is amplified by dysfunctional competition whereas the effect of university knowledge in indigenous innovation is attenuated by environmental uncertainty. In addition, we find that indigenous innovation is positively associated with business performance. The impact of indigenous innovation on business performance is enhanced by dysfunctional competition but reduced by environmental uncertainty. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","dysfunctional competition; environmental uncertainty; indigenous innovation; Intellectual capital; University knowledge","Commerce; Competition; Regression analysis; Business performance; Environmental uncertainty; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management practices; Research models; Small and medium-sized enterprise; University knowledge; Knowledge management","","","","","","","Aboelmaged M.G., Linking Operations Performance to Knowledge Management Capability: The Mediating Role of Innovation Performance, Production Planning and Control, 25, 1, pp. 44-58, (2014); Ahrweiler P., Pyka A., Gilbert N., A New Model for University-Industry Links in Knowledge-Based Economies, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 2, pp. 218-235, (2011); Aiken L.S., West S.G., Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, (1991); Al-Ashaab A., Flores M., Doultsinou A., Magyar A., A Balanced Scorecard for Measuring the Impact of Industry-university Collaboration, Production Planning and Control, 22, 5-6, pp. 554-570, (2011); Alexander A.T., Childe S.J., Innovation: A Knowledge Transfer Perspective, Production Planning and Control, 24, 2-3, pp. 208-225, (2013); Antonakis J., Bendahan S., Jacquart P., Lalive R., On Making Causal Claims: A Review and Recommendations, The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 6, pp. 1086-1120, (2010); Bruneel J., D'Este P., Salter A., Investigating the Factors That Diminish the Barriers to University–industry Collaboration, Research Policy, 39, 7, pp. 858-868, (2010); Chen I.J., Paulraj A., Towards a Theory of Supply Chain Management: The Constructs and Measurements, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 2, pp. 119-150, (2004); Desai D.A., Cost of Quality in Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises: Case of an Indian Engineering Company, Production Planning and Control, 19, 1, pp. 25-34, (2008); Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S., (2015); Fawcett S.E., Waller M.A., Miller J.W., Schwieterman M.A., Hazen B.T., Overstreet R.E., A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceputal, Qualitative, and Survey Research, Journal of Business Logistics, 35, 1, pp. 1-16, (2014); Forbes N., Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S., Higher Education in India: Growth with Challenges, The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation, pp. 85-91, (2014); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, pp. 29-50, (1981); Garengo P., Sharma M.M., Performance Measurement System Contingency Factors: A Case Analysis of Italian and Indian SMEs, Production Planning and Control, 25, 3, pp. 220-240, (2014); Grant R.M., Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, S2, pp. 109-122, (1996); Guide V.D.R., Ketokivi M., Notes from the Editors: Redefining Some Methodological Criteria for the Journal, Journal of Operations Management, pp. v-viii, (2015); Hu L., Bentler P.M., Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1, pp. 1-55, (1999); Hsu I., Sabherwal R., Relationship between Intellectual Captial and Knowledge Management: An Emprical Investigation, Decision Sciences, 43, 3, pp. 489-524, (2012); Hsu L., Wang C., Clarifying the Effect of Intellectual Capital on Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability, British Journal of Management, 23, 2, pp. 179-205, (2012); Kaplan D., Structional Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions, (2009); Kaste F.E., Rosenzweig J.E., Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach, (1985); Ketokivi M.A., Schroeder R.G., Perceptual Measures of Performance: Fact or Fiction?, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 3, pp. 247-264, (2004); Ketokivi M., McIntosh C.N., Addressing the Endogeneity Dilemma in Operations Management: Theoretical, empirical, and Pragmatic Considerations, Journal of Operations Management, 52, 1, pp. 1-14, (2017); Kline R.B., Assumptions of structural equation modeling, Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, (2012); Kotha R., George G., Srikanth K., Bridging the Mutual Knowledge Gap: Coordination and the Commercialization of University Science, Academy of Management Journal, 56, 2, pp. 498-524, (2013); Kozhikode R.K., Li J., Political Pluralism, Public Policies, and Organizational Choices: Banking Branch Expansion in India, 1948–2003, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 2, pp. 339-359, (2012); Kumar M., Antony J., Singh R.K., Tiwari M.K., Perry D., Implementing the Lean Sigma Framework in an Indian SME: A Case Study, Production Planning and Control, 17, 4, pp. 407-423, (2006); Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J.W., Organization and Environment: Managing Organization Differentiation and Integration, (1986); Li H., Atuahene-Gima K., Production Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 6, pp. 1123-1134, (2001); Li Y., Li X., Liu Y., Barnes R., Knowledge Communication, Exploitation and Endogenous Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Internal Controls in SMEs, R&D Management, 41, 2, pp. 156-172, (2011); Li Y., Zhang C., Liu Y., Li M., Organizational Learning, Internal Control Mechanisms, and Indigenous Innovation: The Evidence from China, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57, 1, pp. 63-77, (2010); Lindell M.K., Whitney D.J., Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1, pp. 114-121, (2001); Liu S., Moizer J., Kasturiratune D., Jayawickrama U., A Knowledge Chain Management Framework to Support Integrated Decisions in Global Supply Chains, Production Planning and Control, 25, 8, pp. 639-649, (2014); Lee J.Y., Swink M., Pandejpong T., The Roles of Worker Expertise, information Sharing Quality, and Psychological Safety in Manaufacturing Process Innovation: An Intellecutal Captial Perspective, Production and Operations Management, 20, 4, pp. 556-570, (2011); Maietta O.W., Determinants of University–firm R&D Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: A Perspective from a Low-Tech Industry, Research Policy, 44, 7, pp. 1341-1159, (2015); Mathur A., Mittal M.L., Dangayach G.S., Improving Productivity in Indian SMEs, Production Planning and Control, 23, 10-11, pp. 754-768, (2012); McMahon D., Thorsteinsdottir H., Pursuing Endogenous High-tech Innovation in Developing Countries: A Look at Regenerative Medicine Innovation in Brazil, China and India, Research Policy, 42, 4, pp. 965-974, (2013); Miller T., Kim A.B., (2016); (2016); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Nonaka I., A Dynamic Theory of Organisational Knoweldge Creation, Organization Science, 5, 1, pp. 14-37, (1994); Parayil G., D'Costa A.P., The New Asian Innovation Dyamics: China and India in Perspective, Technology, Globalisation and Development, (2009); Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P., Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5, pp. 879-903, (2003); Prahalad C.K., Mashelkar R.A., Innovation’s Holy Grail, Harvard Business Review, 88, 7-8, pp. 132-141, (2010); Preacher K., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F., Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions, Multivariate Behavioural Research, 42, 1, pp. 185-227, (2007); Sheng S., Zhou K., Lessassy L., NPD Speed vs. Innovativeness: The Contingent Impact of Institutional and Market Environments, Journal of Business Research, 66, 11, pp. 2355-2362, (2013); Sherwood A.L., Covin J.G., Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 2, pp. 162-179, (2008); (2016); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilties, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Teece D.J., Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy, Research Policy, 15, 6, pp. 285-305, (1986); Thakkar J., Kanda A., Deshmukh S.G., Supply Chain Issues in SMEs: Select Insights from Cases of Indian Origin, Production Planning and Control, 24, 1, pp. 47-71, (2013); Un C.A., Asakawa K., Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefit of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 1, pp. 138-153, (2015); Un C.A., Cuervo-Cazurra A., Asakawa K., R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 5, pp. 673-689, (2010); Vickery S.K., Jayaram J., Droge C., Calantone R., The Effects of an Integrative Supply Chain Strategy on Customer Service and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Direct versus Indirect Relationships, Journal of Operations Management, 21, 5, pp. 525-539, (2003); Waehrens B.V., Slepniov D., Johansen J., Offshoring Practices of Danish and Swedish SMEs: Effects on Operations Configuration, Production Planning and Control, 26, 9, pp. 693-705, (2015); Wamba S.F., Gunasekaran A., Bhattacharya M., Dubey R., Determinants of RFID Adoption Intention by SMEs: An Empirical Investigation, Production Planning and Control, 27, 12, pp. 979-990, (2016); Wang L., Yeung J.H.Y., Zhang M., The Impact of Trust and Contract on Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty, International Journal of Production Economics, 134, 1, pp. 114-122, (2011); (2014); (2015); Youndt M.A., Subramaniam M., Snell S.A., Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns, Journal of Management Studies, 41, 2, pp. 335-361, (2004); Zahra S.A., George G., Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension, Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, pp. 185-203, (2002); Zhang M., Zhao X., Lyles M., Guo H., Absorptive Capacity and Mass Customization Capability, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 35, 9, pp. 1275-1294, (2015); Zhang S., Wang Z., Zhao X., Zhang M., Effects of Institutional Support on Innovation and Performance: Roles of Dysfunctional Competition, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117, 1, pp. 50-67, (2017)","F. Lettice; Norwich Business School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom; email: Fiona.lettice@uea.ac.uk","","Taylor and Francis Ltd.","","","","","","09537287","","PPCOE","","English","Prod Plann Control","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85068230733"
"Hassan A.; Adhikariparajuli M.; Fletcher M.; Elamer A.","Hassan, Abeer (24437767600); Adhikariparajuli, Mahalaximi (57211484592); Fletcher, Mary (55830419000); Elamer, Ahmed (57200727964)","24437767600; 57211484592; 55830419000; 57200727964","Integrated reporting in UK higher education institutions","2019","Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","10","5","","844","876","32","57","10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2018-0093","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065648696&doi=10.1108%2fSAMPJ-03-2018-0093&partnerID=40&md5=e056602d01a36434e8cf278878477ac6","University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Paisley, United Kingdom; University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Lanarkshier, United Kingdom; Department of Accounting, University of Brunel Business School, London, United Kingdom","Hassan A., University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Paisley, United Kingdom; Adhikariparajuli M., University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Paisley, United Kingdom; Fletcher M., University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Lanarkshier, United Kingdom; Elamer A., Department of Accounting, University of Brunel Business School, London, United Kingdom","Purpose: This paper aims to examine trends in the content of reporting within 135 UK higher education institutions (HEIs). It explores the extent to which integrated reporting (IR) content elements, reflecting integrated thinking, are disclosed voluntarily and whether HEI-specific features influence the resulting disclosures. Design/methodology/approach: Existing IR guidelines given by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and the adoption of content analysis have provided the opportunity to examine the trend and extent of IR content elements associated in HEI corporate reports. The evidence was obtained from 405 UK HEI annual reports covering the period 2014-2016. Findings: The results indicate a significant increase in the number of IR content elements embedded in HEI annual reports. The HEI-specific characteristics examined, such as the establishment of HEI (before or after 1992), adoption of IR framework and size of HEI, are all significantly and positively associated with IR content elements disclosure. This paper argues that institutional theory, isomorphism and isopraxism are relevant for explaining the changes in the contents of HEI annual reports. The findings also suggest that universities are beginning to adopt an integrated thinking approach to the reporting of their activities. Research limitations/implications: The study is based on IR content elements only and could be extended to include the fundamental concepts and basic principles of the IR framework. There are other factors that have a potentially crucial influence on HEI core activities (such as teaching and learning research and internationalisation) which have been omitted from this study. Practical implications: The findings will allow policymakers to evaluate the extent to which integrated thinking is taking place and influencing the UK HEI sector in the selection and presentation of information. A further implication of the findings is that an appropriate a sector-wide enforcement and compliance body, for instance, the British Universities Finance Directors Group (BUFDG), may consider developing voluntary IR guidance in a clear, consistent, concise and comparable format. Also, it may pursue regulatory support for this guidance. In doing so, it may monitor the compliance and disclosure levels of appropriate IR requirements. Within such a framework, IR could be used to assist HEIs to make more sustainable choices and allow stakeholders to better understand aspects of HEI performance. Social implications: The research has implications for society within and beyond the unique UK HEI sector. Universities are places of advanced thinking and can lead the way for other sectors by demonstrating the potential of integrated thinking to create a cohesive wide-ranging discourse and create engagement among stakeholder groups. Specifically, IR builds on the strong points of accounting, for instance, robust quantitative evidence collecting, relevance, reliability, materiality, comparability and assurability, to explain the sustainability discourse into a “language” logical to HEIs organisational decision makers. Consequently, IR may generate better visibility and knowledge of the financial values of exploiting capitals (financial, intellectual, human, manufactured, social and natural) and offer a multifaceted approach to reassess HEIs organizational performance in various sectors that support the growth of integrated thinking. Originality/value: This is the first known study to explore HEI characteristics and link them with the level of voluntary IR content elements disclosed in UK HEIs. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Content analysis; Higher education institutions; Institutional theory; Integrated reporting; Integrated thinking","","","","","","","","Abed S., Al-Najjar B., Roberts C., Measuring annual report narratives disclosure: empirical evidence from forward-looking information in the UK prior to the financial crisis, Managerial Auditing Journal, 31, 4-5, pp. 338-361, (2016); Abeysekera I., A template for integrated reporting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 227-245, (2013); Adams C., The sustainable development goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report, (2017); Adams C., The sustainable development goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report, (2017); Adams C., The international integrated reporting council: a call to action, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp. 23-28, (2015); Adams C., Debate: Lntegrated reporting and accounting for suitable development across generations by universities, Public Money and Management, 38, 5, pp. 325-327, (2018); Adams C.A., Potter B., Singh P.J., York J., Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures), The British Accounting Review, 48, 3, pp. 283-296, (2016); Adams S., Simnett R., Integrated reporting: an opportunity for Australia's not‐for‐profit sector, Australian Accounting Review, 21, 3, pp. 292-301, (2011); Ahmed Haji A., Anifowose M., Initial trends in corporate disclosures following the introduction of integrated reporting practice in South Africa, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 373-399, (2017); Al-Htaybat K., Alberti-Alhtaybat L., Integrated thinking leading to integrated reporting: case study insights form a global player, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31, 5, pp. 1435-1460, (2018); Alnabsha A., Abdou H.A., Ntim C.G., Elamer A.A., Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures: evidence from a developing country, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19, 1, pp. 20-41, (2018); Alsaeed K., The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: the case of Saudi Arabia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 5, pp. 476-496, (2006); Asaad Y., Melewar T.C., Cohen G., MT Balmer J., Universities and export market orientation: an exploratory study of UK post-92 universities, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 31, 7, pp. 838-856, (2013); Ayoubi R.M., Massoud H.K., The strategy of internationalization in universities: a quantitative evaluation of the intent and implementation in UK universities, International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 4, pp. 329-349, (2007); Berardino D.D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Berbegal-Mirabent J., Ribeiro-Soriano D.E., Behind league tables and ranking systems: a critical perspective of how university quality is measured, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 25, 3, pp. 242-266, (2015); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-2017, (2010); Broecke S., University rankings: do they matter in the UK?, Education Economics, 32, 2, pp. 137-161, (2015); Progress on the latest <IR> project, (2016); Inside the international integrated reporting conference, (2017); Bukh P.N., Nielsen C., Gormsen P., Mouritsen J., Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18, 6, pp. 713-732, (2005); Burke J.J., Clark C.E., The business case for integrated reporting: insights from leading practitioners, regulators, and academics, Business Horizons, 59, 3, pp. 273-283, (2016); Busco C., Frigo M.L., Quattrone P., Riccaboni A., Towards integrated reporting: concepts, elements and principles, Integrated Reporting, pp. 3-18, (2013); Carpenter V.L., Feroz E.H., Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state governments' decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 7-8, pp. 565-596, (2001); Chatelian-Ponroy S., Morin-Delerm S., Adoption of sustainable development reporting by universities: an analysis of French first – time reporters, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29, 5, pp. 887-918, (2016); Cheng M., Green W., Conradie P., Konishi N., Romi A., The international integrated reporting framework: key issues and future research opportunities, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 25, 1, pp. 90-119, (2014); Cheung Y.L., Jiang P., Tan W., A transparency disclosure index measuring disclosures: Chinese listed companies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29, 3, pp. 259-280, (2010); Christie F., The reporting of university league table employability rankings: a critical review, Journal of Education and Work, 30, 4, pp. 403-418, (2016); Clegg S., Hardy C., Studying Organisation Theory and Method, (2005); Cooke T.E., Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 1, 2, pp. 171-195, (1989); Coy D., Dixon K., The public accountability index: crafting a parametric disclosure index for annual reports, The British Accounting Review, 36, 1, pp. 79-106, (2004); De Villiers C., Rinaldi L., Unerman J., Integrated reporting: insights, gaps and an agenda for future research, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27, 7, pp. 1042-1067, (2014); Annual report insights 2014: providing a clear steer, (2014); Dilnot C., The relationship between a – level subject choice and league table score of university attended: the ‘facilitation’, the ‘less suitable’, and the counter – intuitive, Oxford Review of Education, 44, 1, pp. 118-137, (2018); Dragu I.M., Tiron-Tudor A., The integrated reporting initiative from an institutional perspective: emergent factors, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, pp. 275-279, (2013); Eccles R.G., Krzus M.P., One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, (2010); Elamer A.A., Benyazid I., The impact of risk committee on financial performance of UK financial institutions, International Journal of Accounting and Finance, (2018); Elamer A.A., Ntim C.G., Abdou H.A., Islamic governance, national governance, and bank risk management and disclosure in MENA countries, Business and Society, (2017); Elmaghrabi M.E.L., The institutionalisation of integrated reporting: an exploration of adoption, sustainability embeddedness and decoupling, (2014); Feng T., Cummings L., Tweedie D., Exploring integrated thinking in integrated reporting: an exploratory study in Australia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 330-353, (2017); Flower J., The international integrated reporting council: a story of failure, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp. 1-17, (2015); Frias-Aceituno J.V., Rodriguez-Ariza L., Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, pp. 45-55, (2013); Gallego-Alvarez I., Rodriguez-Dominguez L., Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors, Online Information Review, 35, 3, pp. 360-385, (2011); Garanina T., Dumay J., Forward-looking intellectual capital disclosure in IPOs: implications for intellectual capital and integrated reporting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 128-148, (2017); Gibbons S., Neumayer E., Perkins R., Student satisfaction, league tables and university applications: evidence from Britain, Economics of Education Review, 48, pp. 148-164, (2015); Gordon T., Fischer M., Malon D., Tower G., A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public college and universities in the United States, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 3, pp. 235-275, (2002); Gunarathne N., Senaratne S., Diffusion of integrated reporting in an emerging South Asian (SAARC) nation, Managerial Auditing Journal, 32, 4-5, pp. 524-548, (2017); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2013); Halsey A.H., Further and higher education, Twentieth Century British Social Trends, (2000); Hassan A., Hunter C., Asekomeh A., The relationship between GRI application levels and disclosure on specific environmental activities: an empirical investigation of top European companies, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33, 3, pp. 156-176, (2013); Higgins C., Stubbs W., Love T., Walking the talk(s): organisational narratives of integrated reporting, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27, 7, pp. 1090-1119, (2014); Hinson R., Gyabea A., Ibrahim M., Sustainability reporting among Ghanaian universities, South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 41, 1, pp. 22-42, (2015); Humphrey C., O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields: the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘enlightened’ corporate reporting, Accounting and Business Research, 47, 1, pp. 30-63, (2017); Creating value for SMEs through integrated thinking, (2017); The integrated reporting framework, (2013); Integrated reporting <IR>, (2018); Jiang N., Carpenter V., A case study of issues of strategy implementation in internationalization of higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 1, pp. 4-18, (2013); Katsikas E., Rossi F.M., Orelli R.L., Towards Integrated Reporting: Accounting Change in the Public Sector, (2016); Khadaroo M.I., An institutional theory perspective on the UK's private finance initiative (PFI) accounting standard setting process, Public Management Review, 7, 1, pp. 69-94, (2005); King report on governance for South Africa 2009, (2009); Corporate governance for South Africa 2016, (2016); Kilic M., Kuzey C., Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting, Managerial Auditing Journal, 33, 1, pp. 115-144, (2018); Room for improvement – the KPMG survey of business reporting, (2016); Krippendorff K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, (2004); Krizek K.J., Newport D., White J., Townsend A.R., Higher education`s sustainability imperative: how to practically respond?, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 1, pp. 19-33, (2012); Kurochkina I., Shuvalova E., Novozhilova I., About formation of the integrated reporting performance in the process of building a sustainable business of transport and communication companies, Procedia Engineering, 178, 2, pp. 267-277, (2017); Lang M., Lundholm R., Cross – sectional determinants of analyst rating of corporate disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 2, pp. 246-271, (1993); Liao P.C., Xia N.N., Wu C.L., Zhang X.L., Yeh J.L., Communicating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of international contractors: content analysis of CSR reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, pp. 327-336, (2017); Lomas L., The locus of power in UK universities: its impact on educational development centres, Active Learning in Higher Education, 7, 3, pp. 243-255, (2006); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Lozano R., The state of sustainability reporting in universities, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 1, pp. 67-78, (2011); Lozano R.M., Tirado-Valencia P., Do industrial companies respond to the guiding principles of the integrated reporting framework? A preliminary study on the first companies joined to the initiative, Spanish Accounting Review, 19, 2, pp. 252-260, (2016); Lueg K., Lueg R., Andersen K.A., Dancianu V., Integrated reporting with CSR practise, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21, 1, pp. 20-35, (2016); McNally M., Maroun W., It is not always bad news: illustrating the potential of integrated reporting using, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31, 5, pp. 1319-1348, (2018); Maingot M., Zeghal D., An analysis of voluntary disclosure of performance indicators by Canadian universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 14, 4, pp. 269-283, (2008); Maringe F., Strategies and challenges of internationalisation in HE: an exploratory study of UK universities, International Journal of Educational Management, 23, 7, pp. 553-563, (2009); Maroun W., Modifying assurance practices to meet the needs of integrated reporting: the case for ‘interpretive assurance, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 2, pp. 400-427, (2018); Martin R., Austen H., The art of integrative thinking, pp. 2-5, (1999); Melloni G., Caglio A., Perego P., Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in integrated reports, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36, 3, pp. 220-238, (2015); Menard S., Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, (2018); Nomura K., Abe O., Higher education for sustainable development in Japan: policy and progress, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 1, pp. 19-33, (2010); Ntim C.G., Soobaroyen T., Broad M.J., Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability: the case of UK higher education institutions, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 1, pp. 65-118, (2017); Oliver J., Vesty G., Brooks A., Conceptualising integrated thinking in practice, Managerial Auditing Journal, 31, 2, pp. 228-248, (2016); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Pavlopoulos A., Magnis C., Iatridis G.E., Integrated reporting: is it the last piece of the accounting disclosure puzzle?, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 41, pp. 23-46, (2017); Perego P., Kennedy S., Whiteman G., A lot of icing but little cake? Taking integrated reporting forward, Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, pp. 53-64, (2016); Reimsbach D., Hahn R., Gurturk A., Integrated reporting and assurance of sustainability information: an experimental study on professional investors’ information processing, European Accounting Review, 26, 1, pp. 1-23, (2017); Rowbottom N., Locke J., The emergence of <IR>, Accounting and Business Research, 46, 1, pp. 83-115, (2015); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Schmeltz L., Getting CSR communication fit: a study of strategically fitting cause, consumers and company in corporate CSR communication, Public Relations Inquiry, 6, 1, pp. 47-72, (2017); Soh D.S., Leung P., Leong S., The development of integrated reporting and the role of the accounting and auditing profession, In Social Audit Regulation, pp. 33-57, (2015); Solomon J., Maroun W., Integrated reporting: the influence of king III on social, ethical and environmental reporting, (2012); Steenkamp N., Top 10 South African companies’ disclosure of materiality determination process and material issues in integrated reports, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 2, pp. 230-247, (2018); Stubbs W., Higgins C., Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27, 7, pp. 1068-1089, (2014); Veltri S., Silvestri A., The Free State university integrated reporting: a critical consideration, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 443-462, (2015); WeeTarcaKrugAertsPink M., Tilling M., Factors affecting preparers’ and auditors’ judgements about materiality and conciseness in integrated reporting, (2016); Yafele A., Key Performance Indicator Disclosure by Large UK Private and Public Listed companies, (2012); Zappettini F., Unerman J., Mixing’and ‘bending’: the recontextualisation of discourses of sustainability in integrated reporting, Discourse and Communication, 10, 5, pp. 521-542, (2016); Aburaya R., The relationship between corporate governance and environmental disclosure: UK evidence, (2012); Badrul Muttakin M., Khan A., Rahman Belal A., Intellectual Capital disclosures and corporate governance: an empirical examination, Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 31, pp. 219-227, (2015); Ferrero-Ferrero I., Fernandez-Izquierdo M.A., Munoz-Torres M.J., Belles-Colomer L., Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in higher education: an analysis of key internal stakeholders’ expectations, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19, 2, pp. 313-336, (2018); Fonseca A., Macdonald A., Dandy E., Valenti P., The state of sustainability reporting at Canadian universities, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 1, pp. 22-40, (2011); Jensen J.C., Berg N., Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. an institutionalist approach, Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 5, pp. 299-316, (2012); Joshi M., Cabill D., Sidhu J., Kansal M., Intellectual Capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 264-285, (2013); Larran Jorge M., Andrades Pena F.J., Determinant of corporate social responsibility and business ethics education in Spanish universities, Business Ethics: A European Review, 23, 2, pp. 139-152, (2014); Larker D.F., Rusticus T.O., On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 3, pp. 186-205, (2010); Larker D.F., Rusticus T.O., Endogeneity and empirical accounting research, European Accounting Review, 16, 1, pp. 207-215, (2007); Ntim C.G., Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: the case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa, The International Journal of Accounting, 51, 2, pp. 155-216, (2016)","A. Hassan; University of West of Scotland, Business School, Accounting and Finance and Law Division, Paisley, United Kingdom; email: abeer.hassan@uws.ac.uk","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","20408021","","","","English","Sustainability Account. Manage. Policy J.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85065648696"
"Marlina E.; Tjahjadi B.","Marlina, Evi (57214328069); Tjahjadi, Bambang (57191278873)","57214328069; 57191278873","Strategic management accounting and university performance: A critical review","2020","Academy of Strategic Management Journal","19","2","","1","5","4","3","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084293426&partnerID=40&md5=5d01add2797280dfbd209c8b2f328d0c","Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Indonesia; Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia","Marlina E., Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Indonesia; Tjahjadi B., Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia","This article reviews and criticizes research on the relationship between strategic management accounting and university performance. Strategic management accounting research is a series of processes or plans in achieving the goals and objectives and allocating resources from a college organization. The focus of article research in the last ten years, from 2009 to 2018, and before 2013 the theme of the research was the suitability between strategic management accounting design and university performance, including the suitability and effectiveness of performance measurement, intellectual capital, control systems, control, performance evaluation, graduate competency, and evaluation of performance measurement systems. On the other hand, research after 2013 has more complex characterization. The theme of emerging research focuses on the role of strategic management accounting in improving university performance through comprehensive intellectual capital, conformity of financial statements, stakeholder behavior, quality management system and balanced scorecard approach, as well as integrating various steps to enable the achievement of university performance. It can be concluded that our knowledge of the relationship between strategic management accounting and university performance is still limited. This article complements the outline of methodological constraints and areas for future research. © 2020 Allied Business Academies.","Critical review; Strategic management accounting; University performance","","","","","","","","Ali S., Haider Z., Munir F., Khan H., Ahmed A., Factors contributing to the students' academic performance: A case study of Islamia University Sub-Campus, American Journal of Educational Research, 1, 8, pp. 283-289, (2013); Alsharari N.M.D.R., Accounting M.A.E.A.Y., Management accounting change: Critical review and a new contextual framework, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11, 4, pp. 476-502, (2015); Anuforo P.U., Ayoup H., Mustapha U.A., Abubakar A.H., The Implementation of Balance Scorecard and Its Impact on Performance: Case of Universiti Utara Malaysia, International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 4, 1, pp. 1-16, (2019); Asaad Y., Melewar T.C., Cohen G., Balmer J.M., Universities and export market orientation: An exploratory study of UK post-92 universities, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, (2013); Azhar Z., Rahman I.K.A., Managerial performance measures in management accounting practices of Malaysian institutions of higher learning, Management and Accounting Review (MAR), 8, 1, pp. 37-61, (2009); Bromwich M., The case for strategic management accounting: The role of accounting information for strategy in competitive markets, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 1-2, pp. 27-46, (1990); Cadez S., Guilding C., An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 7-8, pp. 836-863, (2008); Cadez S., Dimovski V., Zaman Groff M., Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 8, pp. 1455-1473, (2017); Corrall S., Sriborisutsakul S., Evaluating intellectual assets in university libraries: A multi-site case study from Thailand, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 9, 3, pp. 277-290, (2010); El Kelety I., Towards a conceptual framework for strategic cost management-The concept, objectives, and instruments, (2006); Guilding C., Cravens K.S., Tayles M., An international comparison of strategic management accounting practices, Management Accounting Research, 11, 1, pp. 113-135, (2000); Janudin S.E., Maelah R., Performance measurement system in Malaysian public research universities: Is it contemporary?, International Journal of Management in Education, 10, 3, pp. 219-233, (2016); Kupper H.U., A specific accounting approach for public universities, Journal of Business Economics, 83, 7, pp. 805-829, (2013); Kurniawan Y., Purwito A., Nurani T.W., Achievement of academic performance indicators for undergraduate programs at the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University in the perspective of quality assurance, Journal of Business and Management Applications (JABM), 2, 3, (2016); Langfield-Smith K., A review of quantitative research in management control systems and strategy, Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 2, pp. 753-783, (2006); Lord B.R., Strategic management accounting: The emperor's new clothes?, Management Accounting Research, 7, 3, pp. 347-366, (1996); Love P.E., Zhou J., Edwards D.J., Irani Z., Sing C.P., Off the rails: The cost performance of infrastructure rail projects, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, pp. 14-29, (2017); Maiga A.S., Nilsson A., Ax C., Relationships between internal and external information systems integration, cost and quality performance, and firm profitability, International Journal of Production Economics, 169, pp. 422-434, (2015); Marlina E., Ardi H.A., Samsiah S., Analysis of strategic costing effect towards university performance with competitive advantage as mediating, Prosiding CELSciTech, 3, pp. 27-33, (2018); Marlina E., Ardi H.A., Samsiah S., Ritonga K., Tanjung A.R., Strategic Costing Models as Strategic Management Accounting Techniques at Private Universities in Riau, Indonesia, International Journal of Financial Research, 11, 1, (2020); Minelli E., Rebora G., Turri M., The risk of failure of controls and levers of change: An examination of two Italian public sectors, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, (2008); Mntonintshi O., Mtembu V., When Performance Management Fails: Attitudes and Perceptions of Staff at a Higher Education Institution, Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10, pp. 131-140, (2018); Ozdil E., Hoque Z., Accounting as an engine for the re-creation of strategy at a university, Accounting & Finance, 59, 3, pp. 1741-1762, (2019); Permana D.J., Designing higher education performance measurement systems through the academic scorecard method, Journal of Informatics: Journal of IT Development, 3, 1, pp. 109-114, (2018); Ramos-Monge E.L., Llinas-Audet X., Barrena-Martinez J., Universities as corporate entities: The role of social responsibility in their strategic management, Corporate Governance and Strategic Decision Making, pp. 199-215, (2017); Roslender R., Hart S.J., In search of strategic management accounting: Theoretical and field study perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 14, 3, pp. 255-279, (2003); Sarbaitnil Firdaus F., The character values in minangkabau traditional martial arts, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8, 10, pp. 846-850, (2019); Sin S., Reid A., Jones A., An exploration of students' conceptions of accounting work, Accounting Education, 21, 4, pp. 323-340, (2012); Tatikonda L.U., Tatikonda R.J., Activity-based costing for higher education institutions, Management Accounting Quarterly, 2, 2, (2001); Zusmelia Z., Firdaus F., Ansofino A., Strengthening strategies of the informal sector in traditional market: An institutional approach, Academic of Strategic Management Journal, 18, 3, pp. 1-10, (2019)","","","Allied Business Academies","","","","","","15441458","","","","English","Acad. Strateg. Manage. J","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85084293426"
"Strazzullo S.; Cricelli L.; Grimaldi M.","Strazzullo, Serena (57218296473); Cricelli, Livio (6505918559); Grimaldi, Michele (25652968000)","57218296473; 6505918559; 25652968000","Intellectual capital and R&D performance improvement: the case of Italian public universities","2022","R and D Management","","","","","","","3","10.1111/radm.12548","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133540198&doi=10.1111%2fradm.12548&partnerID=40&md5=27496adec55a3ec05a5baeeeaa976302","Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, Naples, 80125, Italy; Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Via G. Di Biasio 43, Cassino, FR 03043, Italy","Strazzullo S., Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, Naples, 80125, Italy; Cricelli L., Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, Naples, 80125, Italy; Grimaldi M., Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Via G. Di Biasio 43, Cassino, FR 03043, Italy","This paper aims to develop a model to analyse and improve the performance of R&D activities in Italian public universities through the intellectual capital (IC) perspective. The extant literature includes several models for R&D analysis, but none quantify the link between IC and universities' research activity performance. This research attempts to fill a gap in knowledge by explicitly focusing on the relationship between IC according to its dimensions and universities' research activity performance. To achieve this aim, we develop a theoretical model and test the model using secondary data from all the Italian public universities through the structural equation modelling method. The findings show that small universities with a good level of relations with external organisations, a good level of internationalisation and solid infrastructure have a higher level of scientific productivity than larger universities that are less internationalised and invest less in infrastructure. © 2022 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.","","","","","","","","","Abdullah D.F., Sofian S., The relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, pp. 537-541, (2012); Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Evaluating university research: same performance indicator, different rankings, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 3, pp. 514-525, (2015); Agostino D., Arena M., Azzone G., Dal Molin M., Masella C., Developing a performance measurement system for public research centres, International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 7, 1, pp. 43-60, (2012); Asiaei K., Jusoh R., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 2, pp. 294-320, (2018); Barbaranelli C., Ingoglia S., I modelli di equazioni strutturali. Temi e prospettive, (2013); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Bellucci M., Marzi G., Orlando B., Ciampi F., Journal of intellectual capital: a review of emerging themes and future trends, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 4, pp. 744-767, (2021); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bjork B.-C., Solomon D., The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 4, pp. 914-923, (2013); Boedker C., Guthrie J., Cuganesan S., An integrated framework for visualising intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 4, pp. 510-527, (2005); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Byrne B.M., Structural Equation Modelling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, (1994); Chen I.-S., Chen J.-K., Present and future: a trend forecasting and ranking of university types for innovative development from an intellectual capital perspective, Quality and Quantity, 7, pp. 335-352, (2013); Coccia M., New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes, R and D Management, 34, 3, pp. 267-280, (2004); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 69-83, (2018); Demartini P., Paoloni P., Implementing an intellectual capital framework in practice, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 69-83, (2013); De Matos Pedro E., Alves H., Leitao J., In search of intangible connections: intellectual capital, performance and quality of life in higher education institutions, Higher Education, 83, pp. 243-260, (2022); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: Realising Your Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Faizal Omar M., Ahmad Roshidi S.R., Mohd. Jamil J., Kamal F.M., Mohd Nawi M.N., Radzuan K., Towards designing tools for universities' R&D performance measurement on mobile platform, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13, 4, pp. 178-187, (2019); Feng Y.J., Lu H., Bi K., An AHP/DEA method for the measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities, International Transactions in Operational Research, 11, 2, pp. 181-191, (2004); Feng H.-I., Chen C.-S., Wang C.-H., Chiang H.-C., The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer, Service Industries Journal, 32, pp. 899-917, (2012); Foltz J.D., Barham B.L., Chavas J.-P., Kim K., Efficiency and technological change at US research universities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37, 2, pp. 171-186, (2011); Furr R.M., Bacharach V.R., Psychometrics: An Introduction, (2013); Goh S.C., Improving organisational learning capability: lessons from two case studies, The Learning Organisation, 4, pp. 216-227, (2005); Grimaldi M., Cricelli L., Rogo F., A theoretical framework for assessing managing and indexing the intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 4, pp. 501-521, (2013); Hancock G.R., Fortune cookies, measurement error, and experimental design, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2, 2, pp. 293-305, (2003); Iacoviello G., Bruno E., Cappiello A., A theoretical framework for managing intellectual capital in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 33, pp. 919-938, (2019); Inauen M., Schenker-Wicki A., The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 4, pp. 496-520, (2011); Johnes J., Yu L., Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis, China Economic Review, 19, pp. 679-696, (2008); Karami S., Vafaei A., Australian universities and intellectual capital reporting: case study: the group of eight, Corporate Ownership and Control, 11, 4, pp. 288-295, (2014); Kinsella R., McBrierty V., Campus companies and the emerging techno-academic paradigm: the Irish experience, Technovation, 17, pp. 245-251, (1997); Kulikova V., Iklassova K., Kazanbayeva A., Development of a decision-making method to form the indicators for a university development plan, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3, pp. 12-21, (2019); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.-H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, pp. 814-835, (2018); Marr B., Starovic D., Understanding corporate value: managing and reporting intellectual capital, CIMA, 4, 4, pp. 1-28, (2003); Marra M., The ambiguities of performance-based governance reforms in Italy: reviving the fortunes of evaluation and performance measurement, Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, pp. 173-182, (2018); Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., Human capital loss in an academic performance measurement system, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 53-70, (2018); Matricano D., The effect of R&D investments, highly skilled employees, and patents on the performance of Italian innovative startups, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32, 10, pp. 1195-1208, (2020); Parrini A., Doretti M., Lapini G., Structural Equation Models for the assessment of the University experience at the University, (2010); Pedro E.M., Leitao J., Alves E., Bridging intellectual capital, sustainable development and quality of life in higher education institutions, Sustainability, 12, 2, (2020); Pedro E.M., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions: operationalizing measurement through a strategic perspective lens, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, pp. 355-381, (2019); Qin X., Du D., Measuring universities' R&D performance in China's provinces: a multistage efficiency and effectiveness perspective, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30, 12, pp. 1392-1408, (2018); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities a new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Schiuma G., Lerro A., Intellectual capital and company's performance improvement, Measuring Business Excellence, 12, 2, pp. 3-9, (2008); Schwab K., The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elia G., A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: a case study, Measuring Business Excellence, 18, pp. 23-37, (2014); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance, or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 229-239, (2017); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Stewart T.A., Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organisations, Journal of Management Consulting, 10, 1, pp. 61-63, (1997); Sveiby K.E., A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 4, pp. 344-358, (2001); Tijssen R.J.W., Winnink J.J., Capturing “R&D excellence”: indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities, Scientometrics, 114, 2, pp. 687-699, (2017); Veltri S., Puntillo P., On intellectual capital management as an evaluation criterion for university managers: a case study, Journal of Management and Governance, 24, pp. 135-167, (2020); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Zhuo H.H., Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model, Measurement, 45, 5, pp. 856-880, (2012)","L. Cricelli; Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125, Italy; email: livio.cricelli@unina.it","","John Wiley and Sons Inc","","","","","","00336807","","","","English","R D Manage.","Article","Article in press","All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85133540198"
"Maharani I.A.K.; Usman I.","Maharani, Ida Ayu Kartika (57371438900); Usman, Indrianawati (57201718428)","57371438900; 57201718428","The First 17 Years of the Journal of Management, Spirituality, and Religion (JMSR): Bibliometric Overview","2023","Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion","20","3","","206","229","23","1","10.51327/LWUW8903","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163816438&doi=10.51327%2fLWUW8903&partnerID=40&md5=2fd324af39c593024e1416b5be96fd0a","Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia","Maharani I.A.K., Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Usman I., Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia","The Journal of Management, Spirituality, and Religion (JMSR) has been a leading scientific source for scholars interested in the religious and spiritual aspects of managing human capital in organizations. It was created to connect the concepts of spirituality and religiosity to increase awareness of people's spirituality and spiritual leadership in a business setting. It was also, to comprehend the effects of pluralism on organizations as a whole and the critical and distinct role of the various religious views held and the spirituality of each individual. This study uses bibliometric analysis techniques to retrieve all publications from the Scopus database from 2004 to 2020 to honor the 17 years of the JMSR's journey. The current study was carried out to highlight the JMSR's growth, development, and intellectual structure in terms of impact, citations, theme, topic trend evolution, most contributing universities, and collaboration network.  © 2022 Association of Management, Spirituality & Religion.","Bibliometric; Bibliometrix; JMSR; performance analysis; science mapping; VOSViewer","","","","","","","","Afsar B., Rehman M., The relationship between workplace spirituality and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of perceived person-organization fit, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 12, 4, pp. 329-353, (2015); Agarwala R., Mishra P., Singh R., Religiosity and consumer behavior: a summarizing review, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16, 1, pp. 32-54, (2019); Aksnes D., Sivertsen G., A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science, Journal of Data and Information Science, 4, pp. 1-21, (2019); Aksnes D. W., Langfeldt L., Wouters P., Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories, SAGE Open, 9, 1, (2019); Aria M., Cuccurullo C., bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11, 4, pp. 959-975, (2017); Arnetz B. B., Ventimiglia M., Beech P., Demarinis V., Lokk J., Arnetz J. E., Spiritual values and practices in the workplace and employee stress and mental well-being, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10, 3, pp. 271-281, (2013); Balog A. M., Baker L. T., Walker A. G., Religiosity and spirituality in entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11, 2, pp. 159-186, (2014); Bihari A., Tripathi S., Deepak A., A review on h-index and its alternative indices, Journal of Information Science, (2021); Bolton S. C., Being human: Dignity of labor as the foundation for the spirit-work connection, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 7, 2, pp. 157-172, (2010); Bright D. S., Fry R. E., Cooperrider D. L., Forgiveness from the perspectives of three response modes: Begrudgement, pragmatism, and transcendence, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 3, 1-2, pp. 78-103, (2006); Broadus R. N., Toward a definition of ""bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 12, 5-6, pp. 373-379, (1987); Brown R. B., Organizational spirituality: The sceptic's version, Organization, 10, 2, pp. 393-400, (2003); Callon M., Courtial J., Laville F., Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry, Scientometrics, 22, 1, pp. 155-205, (1991); Chaston J., Lips-Wiersma M., When spirituality meets hierarchy: Leader spirituality as a double-edged sword, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 12, 2, pp. 111-128, (2015); Cobo M. J., Lopez-Herrera A. G., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F., Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 7, pp. 1382-1402, (2011); Collins D., Designing ethical organizations for spiritual growth and superior performance: An organization systems approach, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 7, 2, pp. 95-117, (2010); Driscoll C., McIsaac E. M., Wiebe E., The material nature of spirituality in the small business workplace: from transcendent ethical values to immanent ethical actions, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16, 2, pp. 155-177, (2019); Driver M., A ""Spiritual Turn"" in organizational studies: Meaning making or meaningless?, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 4, 1, pp. 56-86, (2007); Exline J. J., Bright D. S., Spiritual and religious struggles in the workplace, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 8, 2, pp. 123-142, (2011); Fang H., Randolph R. V. D. G., Chrisman J. J., Barnett T., Firm religiosity, bounded stakeholder salience, and stakeholder relationships in family firms, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10, 3, pp. 253-270, (2013); Fornaciari C. J., Lund Dean K., Foundations, lessons, and insider tips for MSR research, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 6, 4, pp. 301-321, (2009); Fry L W, Latham J. R., Clinebell S. K., Krahnke K., Spiritual leadership as a model for performance excellence: a study of Baldrige award recipients, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 14, 1, pp. 22-47, (2017); Fry Louis W, Matherly L. L., Ouimet J. -Rober, The Spiritual Leadership Balanced Scorecard Business Model: the case of the Cordon Bleu-Tomasso Corporation, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 7, 4, pp. 283-314, (2010); Geh E., Tan G., Spirituality at work in a changing world: Managerial and research implications, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 6, 4, pp. 287-300, (2009); Gingras Y., Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses (History and Foundations of Information Science), (2016); Godwin J. L., Neck C. P., D'Intino R. S., Self-leadership, spirituality, and entrepreneur performance: a conceptual model, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 13, 1, pp. 64-78, (2016); Gotsis G., Kortezi Z., Philosophical foundations of workplace spirituality: A critical approach, Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 4, pp. 575-600, (2008); Guerrero-Bote V. P., Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z., Mendoza A., de Moya-Anegon F., Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5, pp. 1-12, (2021); Hirsch J. E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 46, pp. 16569-16572, (2005); Houghton J. D., Neck C. P., Krishnakumar S., The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 13, 3, pp. 177-205, (2016); Hunsaker W. D., Spiritual leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: relationship with Confucian values, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 13, 3, pp. 206-225, (2016); Jamali D., Sdiani Y., Does religiosity determine affinities to CSR?, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10, 4, pp. 309-323, (2013); Jonsen R. H., Other-constituency theories and firm governance: is the benefit corporation sufficient?, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 13, 4, pp. 288-303, (2016); Kauanui S. K., Thomas K. D., Sherman C. L., Waters G. R., Gilea M., Exploring entrepreneurship through the lens of spirituality, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 5, 2, pp. 160-189, (2008); Kessler M. M., Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American documentation, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (1963); Khari C., Sinha S., Transcendence at workplace scale: development and validation, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 17, 4, pp. 352-371, (2020); King J. E., Williamson I. O., Workplace religious expression, religiosity and job satisfaction: Clarifying a relationship, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 2, 2, pp. 173-198, (2005); Lee S., Lovelace K. J., Manz C. C., Serving with spirit: An integrative model of workplace spirituality within service organizations, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11, 1, pp. 45-64, (2014); Low A., Purser R., Zen and the creative management of dilemmas, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 9, 4, pp. 335-355, (2012); Lu K., Wolfram D., Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 10, pp. 1973-1986, (2012); Madison K., Kellermanns F. W., Is the spiritual bond bound by blood? An exploratory study of spiritual leadership in family firms, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10, 2, pp. 159-182, (2013); Martin-Martin A., Orduna-Malea E., Thelwall M., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar E., Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: Which is best for me? | Impact of Social Sciences, LSE Impact Blogs, pp. 1-4, (2019); Molloy K. A., Dik J., Davis D., Duffy ., Work calling and humility: framing for job idolization, workaholism, and exploitation, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16, 5, pp. 428-444, (2019); Naimon E. C., Mullins M. E., Osatuke K., The effects of personality and spirituality on workplace incivility perceptions, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10, 1, pp. 91-110, (2013); Petchsawang P., Duchon D., Workplace spirituality, meditation, and work performance, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 9, 2, pp. 189-208, (2012); Phipps K. A., The limitations of accommodation: the changing legal context of religion at work in the United States, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 16, 4, pp. 339-347, (2019); Pritchard A., Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics, Journal of documentation, 25, 4, pp. 348-249, (1969); Ritchie M., Nicholas D., Literature and bibliometrics, (1978); Saks A. M., Workplace spirituality and employee engagement, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8, 4, pp. 317-340, (2011); Singh R. K., Singh S., Spirituality in the workplace: a systematic review, Management Decision, 60, 5, pp. 1296-1325, (2022); Tackney C. T., Chappell S., Harris D., Pavlovich K., Egel E., Major R., Finney M., Stoner J., Management, Spirituality, and Religion (MSR) ways and means: a paper to encourage quality research, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 14, 3, pp. 245-254, (2017); Van Den Dool E. C., The spirituality of Soelles liberation theology in social innovation: Empirical research into a via transformativa for organizations, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 9, 1, pp. 49-65, (2012); van Eck N. J., Waltman L., Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping, Scientometrics, 84, 2, pp. 523-538, (2010); Van Noorden R., Google Scholar pioneer on search engine's future, Nature, pp. 1-3, (2020); Vu M. C., Gill R., Is there corporate mindfulness? An exploratory study of Buddhistenacted spiritual leaders' perspectives and practices, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 15, 2, pp. 155-177, (2018); Weitz E., Vardi Y., Setter O., Spirituality and organizational misbehavior, Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 9, 3, pp. 255-281, (2012)","I.A.K. Maharani; Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; email: ida.ayu.kartika.m-2020@feb.unair.ac.id","","International Association of Management, Spirituality and Religion","","","","","","14766086","","","","English","J. Manage. Spirit. Relig.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85163816438"
"Martin-Sardesai A.; Guthrie J.","Martin-Sardesai, Ann (55331812000); Guthrie, James (8396129000)","55331812000; 8396129000","Human capital loss in an academic performance measurement system","2018","Journal of Intellectual Capital","19","1","","53","70","17","50","10.1108/JIC-06-2017-0085","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039708892&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-06-2017-0085&partnerID=40&md5=3c4f166aa56439bbf730c2014fb654a1","School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Sydney, Australia; Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia","Martin-Sardesai A., School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Sydney, Australia; Guthrie J., Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the perceptions of academic human capital (HC) towards a university’s research performance measurement system (PMS), in response to a national research assessment exercise (RAE). Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on a subset of the data from a large mixed method case study research project about the impact of ERA on an Australian public sector university. Findings: The findings reveal that the research PMSs were designed, implemented and used as a tool to measure and manage the research performance of HC within the university. The case study university performed well in the RAE. However, this also led to several unintended consequences in the form of fear and anxiety, gaming and strategic initiatives, a focus on quantity and not the quality of research, and increased workload, which led to a loss in the stock of HC. Practical implications: This empirical evidence can inform governments and policy makers of the unintended consequences of government research evaluations on academic HC. University managers could improve the design of HC management systems by not only measuring academic HC performance, but also providing training and resources to enhance, support and maintain the overall well-being of academics. Originality/value: This study provides insights regarding the connection between a university’s PMS and academic HC and contributes to the academic literature on intellectual capital and PMSs. © 2018, © Emerald Publishing Limited.","Academic human capital; Academics; Australian higher education sector; Human capital management systems; Performance measurement systems","","","","","","","","Agyemang G., Broadbent J., Management control systems and research management in universities: an empirical and conceptual exploration, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 7, pp. 1018-1046, (2015); Aspromourgos A., The managerialist university: an economic interpretation, Australian Universities Review, 54, 2, pp. 44-49, (2012); Factsheet – Australian research council (ARC), (2010); Banal-Estanol A., Jofre-Bonet M., Lawson C., The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: evidence from engineering academics in the UK, Research Policy, 44, 6, pp. 1160-1175, (2015); Berry A., Coad A., Harris E., Otley D., Stringer C., Emerging themes in management control: a review of recent literature, The British Accounting Review, 41, 1, pp. 2-20, (2009); Boedker C., Mouritsen J., Guthrie J., Enhanced business reporting: international trends and possible policy directions, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 12, 1, pp. 14-25, (2008); Bok D., Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education, (2009); Braun V., Clarke V., Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 3, pp. 77-101, (2006); Broadbent J., The UK research assessment exercise: performance measurement and resource allocation, Australian Accounting Review, 20, 1, pp. 14-23, (2010); Broadbent J., Guthrie J., Public sector to public services: 20 years of contextual accounting research, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 2, pp. 129-169, (2008); Broadbent J., Laughlin R., Read S., Recent financial and administrative changes in the NHS: a critical theory analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2, 1, pp. 1-29, (1991); Burritt R., Guthrie J., Evans E., Christ K., Expanding Collaboration between Industry and Business Faculties in Australia, (2017); Carr K., A new era for Australian research quality assessment, (2008); Cavalluzzo K.S., Ittner C.D., Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 3-4, pp. 243-267, (2004); Coaldrake P., Stedman L., Academic work in the twenty-first century, (1999); Costellanos R., Rodrigues A., Ranguelov S., University R&D&T capital: what types of knowledge drive it?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Creswell J.W., Qualitative Inquiry Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, (2007); Creswell J.W., Miller D.L., Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39, 3, pp. 124-130, (2000); Davies A., Thomas R., Managerialism and accountability in higher education: the gendered nature of restructuring and the costs to academic service, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 179-193, (2002); de Bruijn H., Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 7, pp. 578-594, (2002); de Lange P., O'Connell B., Mathews M.R., Sangster A., The ERA: a brave new world of accountability for Australian university accounting schools, Australian Accounting Review, 20, 1, pp. 24-37, (2010); Deem R., New managerialism and higher education: the management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8, 1, pp. 47-70, (1998); Deem R., Brehony K., Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education, Oxford Review of Education, 31, 2, pp. 217-235, (2007); Dess G., Picken J., How leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital, (2008); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., Public sector and IC: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Nielsen C., The past, present, and future for intellectual capital research: an overview, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 1-17, (2017); Edgar F., Geare A., Characteristics of high- and low-performing university departments as assessed by the New Zealand Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) exercise, Australian Accounting Review, 20, 1, pp. 55-63, (2010); Esposito V., Nito E.D., Iacono M.P., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: the role of performance management systems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 431-450, (2013); Fine C.R., Castagnera J.O., Should there be corporate concern?: examining American university intellectual property policies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 1, pp. 49-60, (2003); Godemann J., Bebbington J., Herzig C., Moon J., Higher education and sustainable development: exploring possibilities for sustainable development, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 2, pp. 218-233, (2014); Guthrie J., Parker L.D., The global accounting academic: what counts!, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 1, pp. 2-14, (2014); Guthrie J., Russo S., Public Value Management: Challenge of Defining, Measuring and Reporting for Public Services, (2014); Guthrie J., Evans E., Burritt R., Australian accounting academics: challenges and possibilities, Mediatri Accountancy Research, 22, 1, pp. 20-37, (2014); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 1, pp. 68-82, (2012); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, British Accounting Review, 44, 2, (2012); Guthrie J., Dumay J., Ricceri F., Neilsen C., The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, (2017); Harley S., Accountants divided: research selectivity and accounting labour in UK universities, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5, 11, pp. 549-582, (2000); Helden J.G.V., Researching public sector transformation: the role of management accounting, Financial Accountability & Management, 21, 1, pp. 99-133, (2005); Henk ter Bogt J., Scapens R.W., Performance measurement in universities: a comparative study of two A&F groups in the Netherlands and the UK, (2009); Henk ter Bogt J., Scapens R.W., Performance management in universities: effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems, European Accounting Review, 21, 3, pp. 451-497, (2012); Hicks D., Performance-based university research funding systems, Research Policy, 41, 2, pp. 251-261, (2012); Research: Research Excellence Framework (REF), (2010); Hood C., The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme, Accounting Organizations and Society, 20, 2-3, pp. 93-109, (1995); Kok S., Douglas K., McClelland A., Bryde D., The move towards managerialism: perceptions of staff in ‘traditional’ and ‘new’ UK universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 16, 2, pp. 99-113, (2010); Kucharcikova A., Managerial approaches to the understanding the human capital, Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 5, 1, pp. 60-70, (2013); Kucharcikova A., Tokarcikova E., Blaskova M., Human capital management - aspect of the human capital efficiency in university education, pp. 48-60, (2015); Laegreid P., Christensen T., Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, (2013); Laughlin R., Critical reflections on research approaches, accounting regulation and the regulation of accounting, The British Accounting Review, 39, 4, pp. 271-289, (2007); Martin B., Whitley R., The UK Research Assessment Exercise: A Case Study of Regulatory Capture, (2010); Martin-Sardesai A., Institutional entrepreneurship and management control systems, Pacific Accounting Review, 28, 4, pp. 458-470, (2016); Martin-Sardesai A., Irvine H., Tooley S., Guthrie J., Accounting for research: academic responses to research performance demands in an Australian university, The Australian Accounting Review, 27, 3, pp. 329-334, (2017); Martin-Sardesai A., Irvine H., Tooley S., Guthrie J., Organizational change in an Australian university: responses to a research assessment exercise, The British Accounting Review, 49, 4, pp. 399-412, (2017); Martin-Sardesai A., Irvine H., Tooley S., Guthrie J., Government research evaluations and academic freedom: a UK and Australian comparison, Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 2, pp. 372-385, (2017); Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W., Management Control Systems, Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives, (2006); Michalak J., Krasodomska J., Rimmel G., Sort J., Trzmielak D., Intellectual capital management in public universities?, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 149-167, (2017); Moed H., Research assessment 101: an introduction, (2011); Nalbantian H.R., Optimizing rewards: applying the new science of human capital measurement and management, (2010); Nazari J., Kline T., Herremans I., Conducting Survey Research in Management Accounting, (2006); Neumann R., Guthrie J., Australian public management reform: research and doctoral education in the context of management knowledge, Public Management Review, 6, 4, pp. 473-492, (2004); Northcott D., Linacre S., Producing spaces for academic discourse: the impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings, The Australian Accounting Review, 20, 1, pp. 38-54, (2010); Otley D., Research assessment in the UK: an overview of 1992-2008, Australian Accounting Review, 52, 20, pp. 3-13, (2010); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Parker L., It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 5-6, pp. 603-619, (2002); Parker L., Contemporary university strategising: the financial imperative, Financial Accountability & Management, 29, 1, pp. 1-25, (2013); Parker L., Gould G., Changing public sector accountability: critiquing new directions, Accounting Forum, 23, 2, pp. 109-135, (1999); Parker L.D., Qualitative management accounting research: assessing deliverables and relevance, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23, 1, pp. 54-70, (2012); Parker L.D., Guthrie J., Performance auditing: the jurisdiction of the Australian Auditor General – De Jure or De Facto?, Financial Accountability and Management, 7, 2, pp. 107-116, (1991); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Purbey S., Mukherjee K., Bhar C., Performance measurement system for healthcare processes, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 1, 56, pp. 241-251, (2006); Ricceri F., Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management: Strategic Management of Knowledge Resources, (2008); Richard Baker C., Review of ‘the corporatisation of research in Australian higher education’ by Neumann and Guthrie, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 5-6, pp. 743-745, (2002); Roslender R., Monk L., Accounting for people, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 40-56, (2017); Ryan G.W., Bernard H.R., Data Management and Analysis Methods, (2000); Ryan S., Guthrie J., Collegial entrepreneurialism: Australian graduate schools of business, Public Management Review, 11, 3, pp. 317-344, (2009); Ryan S., Guthrie J., Neumann R., The case of Australian higher education: performance, markets and government control, European Universities in Transition: Issues, Models and Cases, pp. 171-187, (2008); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Smyth J., How did we get to this situation? The immiseration of the modern university in a globalizing context, Contemporary Colleges & Universities, pp. 332-346, (2013); ter Bogt H., Scapens R.W., Performance management in universities: effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems, European Accounting Review, 21, 3, pp. 451-497, (2012); Thiel S.V., Leeuw F., The performance paradox in the public sector, Public Performance and Management Review, 25, 3, pp. 267-281, (2002); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); van Dooren H., Bouckaert G., Halligan J., Performance Management in the Public Sector, (2015); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Warden C., New modes of self-description: universities reaction in a changing environment, (2004); Whittington G., Unto every one that hath shall be given: the allocation of resources between subject areas under the HEFCE formula, Financial Accountability & Management, 16, 3, pp. 252-264, (2000); Willmott H., Managing the academics: commodification and control in the development of university education in the UK, Human Relations, 48, 9, pp. 993-1027, (1995); Wills D., Ridley G., Mitey H., Research productivity of accounting academics in changing and challenging times, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 9, 1, pp. 4-25, (2013); Winter R., Taylor T., Sarros J., Trouble at mill: quality of academic worklife issues with a comprehensive Australian university, Studies in Higher Education, 25, 3, pp. 279-294, (2000); Yin R.K., Case Study Research Design and Methods, (2009); Yokoyama K., The effect of the research assessment exercise on organisational culture in English universities: collegiality versus managerialism, Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 4, pp. 311-322, (2006)","A. Martin-Sardesai; School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Sydney, Australia; email: a.sardesai@cqu.edu.au","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85039708892"
"Singh V.; Verma S.; Chaurasia S.S.","Singh, Vibhav (57218191722); Verma, Surabhi (57190280103); Chaurasia, Sushil S. (57190223926)","57218191722; 57190280103; 57190223926","Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses","2020","Scientometrics","122","3","","1275","1302","27","35","10.1007/s11192-019-03328-0","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077074680&doi=10.1007%2fs11192-019-03328-0&partnerID=40&md5=28814804989576c915053817d9e3e6ba","Human Resource Management, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies University, Navi Mumbai, India; Center of Integrative Innovation Management, Department of Marketing and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Marketing Area, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies University, Navi Mumbai, India","Singh V., Human Resource Management, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies University, Navi Mumbai, India; Verma S., Center of Integrative Innovation Management, Department of Marketing and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Chaurasia S.S., Marketing Area, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies University, Navi Mumbai, India","Corporate university is a unique form of educational arrangement to accomplish an organization’s goals by building the intellectual capital of its employees. In the academia, it is a relatively new concept that gained foothold during the 1990s. While it is a fertile area of research with several works unravelling its diverse aspects, only a few studies have delved into building the knowledge blocks of the concept of corporate university. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the major clusters of corporate universities obtained from the extant literature. In this study, 207 pertinent articles were retrieved from Scopus, an online electronic database. Post this, co-citation and citation analysis was performed on the 207 articles and a co-citation matrix was formulated to enlist the clusters of corporate universities. Subsequently, multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis techniques were used to extract the essential clusters of corporate university. Finally, five major clusters emerged: (1) corporate university as a source of competitive advantage, (2) corporate university as a layered concept, (3) reimagining corporate university through technology, (4) corporate universities: paradigms and models and (5) corporate university: performance metrics. Results of this study can act as leading insights for future studies and practitioners. © 2019, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.","Cluster analysis; Co-citation analysis; Corporate university; Literature review; Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis","","","","","","","","Acedo F.J., Barroso C., Galan J.L., The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 7, pp. 621-636, (2006); Allen M., What is a next-generation corporate university?, The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities, pp. 3-18, (2007); Alonso-Gonzalez A., Peris-Ortiz M., Chacon L.A.P., Corporate universities as a new paradigm and source of social innovation, sustainability, technology and education in the XXI century, Strategies and best practices in social innovation, pp. 153-169, (2018); Anderson V., Desperately seeking alignment: Reflections of senior line managers and HRD executives, Human Resource Development International, 12, 3, pp. 263-277, (2009); Andresen M.A., Lichtenberger B.L., The corporate university landscape in Germany, Journal of Workplace Learning, 19, 2, pp. 109-123, (2007); Andrews J.E., An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91, 1, pp. 47-56, (2003); Antonelli G., Cappiello G., Pedrini G., The corporate university in the European utility industries, Utilities Policy, 25, pp. 33-41, (2013); Arnone M., Corporate universities: A viewpoint on the challenges and best practices, Career Development International, 3, 5, pp. 199-205, (1998); Assefa S.G., Rorissa A., A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 12, pp. 2513-2536, (2013); Barley K., Learning as a competitive business variable, The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities, pp. 39-62, (2007); Corporate universities—An Engine for Human Capital, (2013); Blass E., What's in a name? A comparative study of the traditional public university and the corporate university, Human Resource Development International, 4, 2, pp. 153-172, (2001); Blass E., The rise and rise of the corporate university, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 1 SPEC. ISS., pp. 58-74, (2005); Calma A., Davies M., Geographies of influence: A citation network analysis of higher education 1972–2014, Scientometrics, 110, 3, pp. 1579-1599, (2017); Cappiello G., Pedrini G., The performance evaluation of corporate universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 23, 3, pp. 304-317, (2017); Carton G., McMillan C., Overall J., Strategic capacities in US universities—The role of business schools as institutional builders, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16, 1, pp. 186-198, (2018); Chernykh S.I., Parshikov V.I., Corporate education in Russia, Professional Education in the Modern World, 6, 2, pp. 242-247, (2016); Clarke T., Hermens A., Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning, Education + Training, 43, pp. 256-267, (2001); Clinton M.S., Merritt K.L., Murray S.R., Using corporate universities to failitate knowledge transfer and achieve competitive advantage: An exploratory model based on media richness and type of knowledge to be transferred, International Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 4, pp. 43-59, (2009); Cote J.E., Allahar A., Lowering higher education: The rise of corporate universities and the fall of liberal education, (2011); Crocetti C., Corporate learning—A knowledge management perspective, Internet and Higher Education, 4, 3-4, pp. 271-285, (2001); Culnan M.J., Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A co-citation analysis, MIS Quarterly, 11, 3, pp. 341-353, (1987); Dealtry R., Case research into corporate university developments, Journal of Workplace Learning, 12, 6, pp. 252-257, (2000); Dealtry R., Case research into the evolution of a corporate university development process, Journal of Workplace Learning, 12, 8, pp. 342-357, (2000); Dealtry R., How to configure the corporate university for success, Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 2, pp. 73-79, (2001); Dealtry R., Managing the corporate university watershed, Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 6, pp. 256-261, (2002); Dealtry R., Managing the issue of learning relevance in the formulation of corporate learning strategies, Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 5, pp. 209-214, (2002); Dealtry R., The future of corporate universities: How your company can benefit from value and performance-driven organisational development, (2017); Donoghue F., The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities, (2008); Doody K.J., Implementing a corporate-university relations program, Research Technology Management, 44, 5, pp. 42-46, (2001); Dove R., Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 1, pp. 18-35, (1999); Eccles G., Marketing the corporate university or enterprise academy, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 7, pp. 410-418, (2004); El-Tannir A.A., The corporate university model for continuous learning, training and development, Education + Training, 44, 2, pp. 76-81, (2002); Elazier T., Successful evaluation by design, Training initiatives and strategies for the modern workforce, pp. 1-18, (2016); Ellis S., Buckman laboratories learning center, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 3, pp. 189-196, (1997); Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G., Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses, FASEB Journal, 22, 2, pp. 338-342, (2008); Farias V., Oliveira J., Souza J., Knowledge management integrating organizational learning in a military context: The 3M model, International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 9, 1, pp. 111-123, (2009); Fulmer R.M., Gibbs P.A., Lifelong learning at the corporate university, Career Development International, 3, 5, pp. 177-184, (1998); Ghomi H., Barzinpour F., Identifying the success factors of knowledge management tools in research projects (case study: A corporate university), Management Science Letters, 8, 8, pp. 805-818, (2018); Grey C., Re-imagining relevance: A response to starkey and madan, British Journal of Management, 12, Special Issue, pp. S27-S32, (2001); Guerci M., Bartezzaghi E., Solari L., Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: A stakeholder-based analysis, International Journal of Training and Development, 14, 4, pp. 291-308, (2010); Hansen P., Jaumard B., Cluster analysis and mathematical programming, Mathematical Programming, 79, 1-3, pp. 191-215, (1997); Hilse H., Nicolai A.T., Strategic learning in Germany’s largest companies, The Journal of Management Development, 23, 3-4, pp. 372-398, (2004); Holland P., Pyman A., Corporate universities: A catalyst for strategic human resource development?, Journal of European Industrial Training, 30, 1, pp. 19-31, (2006); Homan G., MacPherson A., E-learning in the corporate university, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 1 SPEC. ISS., pp. 75-90, (2005); Ivanovic L., Ho Y.S., Highly cited articles in the education and educational research category in the Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis, Educational Review, 71, pp. 1-10, (2017); Jansink F., Kwakman K., Streumer J., The knowledge-productive corporate university, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 1 SPEC. ISS., pp. 40-57, (2005); Johnson B., Kavanagh P., Mattson K., Steal This University: The Rise of The Corporate University and The Academic Labor Movement, (2003); Khan M.A., The emerging corporate university system, Business education and ethics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, pp. 1469-1492, (2017); Kruskal J.B., Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis, Psychometrika, 29, 1, pp. 1-27, (1964); Leary A.G., Cohen E., Building a holistic development framework, The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities, pp. 19-38, (2007); Lee J., Design of blended training for transfer into the workplace, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 2, pp. 181-198, (2010); Lenderman H., Sandelands E., Learning for a purpose: Building a corporate university, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 14, 7, pp. 382-384, (2002); Lenderman L., Sandelands E., Breaking the educational glass ceiling: An interview with Harry Lenderman, Education + Training, 47, 2, pp. 134-141, (2005); Lui Abel A., Li J., Exploring the corporate university phenomenon: Development and implementation of a comprehensive survey, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23, 1, pp. 103-126, (2012); Luna-Amaya C., De La Hoz R., Gomez-Velasquez A., Manjarres-Salas A., Vidal J., Jaramillo O., Berdugo-Correa C., Corporate university and organizational learning: A theoretical framework. [Universidad corporativa y aprendizaje organizacional: Un marco de referencia], Direccion y Organizacion, 58, pp. 79-94, (2016); Macpherson A., Homan G., Wilkinson K., The implementation and use of e-learning in the corporate university, Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 1-2, pp. 33-48, (2005); MacRoberts M., MacRoberts B., Problems of citation analysis, Scientometrics, 36, 3, pp. 435-444, (1996); Marti-Parreno J., Mendez-Ibanez E., Alonso-Arroyo A., The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 6, pp. 663-676, (2016); Masalimova A.R., Ikramova G.D., Shaidullina A.R., Gubaidullina G.T., Apraksina N.D., Distant in-company foreign language learning involving university students–tutors, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11, 7, pp. 1123-1127, (2014); Matthews P., Aqua universitas, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 2, pp. 105-112, (1997); McCain K.W., Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 6, pp. 433-443, (1990); Meister J.C., Ten steps to creating a corporate university, T and D, 52, 11, (1998); Naggy J., Robb A., Can universities be good corporate citizens?, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 8, pp. 1414-1430, (2008); Nevins M.D., Teaching to learn and learning to teach: Notes toward building a university in a management consulting firm, Career Development International, 3, 5, pp. 185-193, (1998); Parshakov P., Shakina E.A., With or without CU: A comparative study of efficiency of European and Russian corporate universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 96-111, (2018); Paton R., Peters G., Storey J., Taylor S., Corporate universities as strategic learning initiatives, Handbook of corporate university development-initiatives in public and private domain, pp. 5-16, (2005); Patrucco A.S., Pellizzoni E., Buganza T., The design process of corporate universities: A stakeholder approach, Journal of Workplace Learning, 29, 4, pp. 304-318, (2017); Corporate Universities: The Age of Learning, (2016); Pilkington A., Liston-Heyes C., Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19, 1, pp. 7-20, (1999); Pilkington A., Meredith J., The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis, Journal of operations management, 27, 3, pp. 185-202, (2009); Pratt J.A., Hauser K., Sugimoto C.R., Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: A bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics, 93, 2, pp. 279-304, (2012); Prince C., Allison S., Corporate university developments in the UK SME sector, Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 5, pp. 229-239, (2003); Prince C., Beaver G., The rise and rise of the corporate university: the emerging corporate learning agenda, The International Journal ofManagement Education, 1, 2, pp. 17-26, (2001); Prince C., Beaver G., Redefining the role of the corporate university: A UK perspective, Industry and Higher Education, 16, 4, pp. 213-221, (2002); Prince C., Stewart J., Corporate universities–an analytical framework, Journal of Management Development, 21, 10, pp. 794-811, (2001); Prince C., Stewart J., Corporate universities—An analytical framework, Journal of Management Development, 21, 10, pp. 794-811, (2002); Punj G., Stewart D.W., Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, pp. 134-148, (1983); Qiao J.X., Corporate universities in china: Processes, issues and challenges, Journal of Workplace Learning, 21, 2, pp. 166-174, (2009); Rademakers M., Corporate universities: Driving force of knowledge innovation, Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 1-2, pp. 130-136, (2005); Rademakers M., Corporate universities, (2014); Rheaume L., Gardoni M., The challenges facing corporate universities in dealing with open innovation, Journal of Workplace Learning., 27, 4, pp. 315-328, (2015); Rodriguez B.C.P., Armellini A., Interaction and effectiveness of corporate e-learning programmes, Human Resource Development International, 16, 4, pp. 480-489, (2013); Roy M.H., Elfner E., Analyzing student satisfaction with instructional technology techniques, Industrial and Commercial Training, 34, 7, pp. 272-277, (2002); Ryan L., Prince C., Turner P., The changing and developing role of the corporate university post-millennium, Industry and Higher Education, 29, 3, pp. 167-174, (2015); Sa Freire P., Dandolini G., Souza J.A., Silva S.M., Corporate university network (C.U.N.) implementation process. [Processo de implantação da universidade corporativa em rede (UCR)], Espacios, 37, 23, pp. 1-16, (2017); Sandelands E., Developing a robust model of the virtual corporate university, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 3, pp. 181-188, (1997); Scarso E., Corporate universities as knowledge management tools, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47, 4, pp. 538-554, (2017); Selby L., Russell D., Curriculum design and management in the Digital Media U. Applying the corporate university concept to a business sub-sector, Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 1-2, pp. 24-32, (2005); Shiau W.L., Dwivedi Y.K., Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research, Scientometrics, 94, 3, pp. 1317-1337, (2012); Shiau W.L., Dwivedi Y.K., Tsai C.H., Supply chain management: Exploring the intellectual structure, Scientometrics, 105, 1, pp. 215-230, (2015); Shiau W.L., Dwivedi Y.K., Yang H.S., Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks, International Journal of Information Management, 37, 5, pp. 390-399, (2018); Small H., Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 4, pp. 265-269, (1973); Small H., Garfield E., The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings, Journal of information science, 11, 4, pp. 147-159, (1985); Steinhardt I., Schneijderberg C., Gotze N., Baumann J., Krucken G., Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: The emergence of a specialty?, Higher Education, 74, 2, pp. 221-237, (2017); Swanson R.A., Holton E., Holton E.F., Foundations of human resource development, (2001); Thompson G., Unfulfilled prophecy: The evolution of corporate colleges, The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 3, pp. 322-341, (2000); Torraco R.J., Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples, Human Resource Development Review, 4, pp. 356-367, (2005); Torraco R.J., Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future, Human Resource Development Review, 15, 4, pp. 404-428, (2016); Trondsen E., Vickery K., Learning on demand, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 3, pp. 169-180, (1997); van Eck N.J., Waltman L., Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer, Scientometrics, 111, 2, pp. 1053-1070, (2017); Verger A., Stoffels G., Bauer E.K., Lohmann P., Blau T., Fink G.R., Neumaier B., Shah N.J., Langen K.J., Galldiks N., Static and dynamic 18 F-FET PET for the characterization of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 45, 3, pp. 443-451, (2018); Verma S., Mapping the intellectual structure of the big data research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis, Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 31, 1, pp. 21-52, (2018); Vizcaya-Pineros P., Uribe-Atehortua E.J., Aportes de la Universidad Corporativa a laventaja competitiva de las organizaciones en Colombia, (2014); Von Wartburg I., Teichert T., Rost K., Inventive progress measured by multistage patent citation analysis, Research Policy, 34, 10, pp. 1591-1607, (2005); Walton J., Would the real corporate university please stand up?, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 1, pp. 7-20, (2005); Wang G.G., Li J., Qiao X., Sun J.Y., Understanding the corporate university phenomenon: A human capital theory perspective, International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10, 2, pp. 182-204, (2010); Wang N., Liang H., Jia Y., Ge S., Xue Y., Wang Z., Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis, Decision Support Systems, 86, pp. 35-47, (2016); Wognum I., Fond Lam J., Stakeholder involvement in strategic HRD aligning: The impact on HRD effectiveness, International Journal of Training and Development, 4, 2, pp. 98-110, (2000); Wu F., Corporate university: An innovation of organizational learning in China, (2015); Zammuto R.F., Accreditation and the globalization of business, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 2, pp. 256-268, (2008); Zhang L., Boies K., Corporate university: A systems thinking situating senior leader assessment and development in context to enhance organizational viability, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 4, pp. 669-676, (2018)","V. Singh; Human Resource Management, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies University, Navi Mumbai, India; email: drvibhav1108@gmail.com","","Springer Science and Business Media B.V.","","","","","","01389130","","","","English","Scientometrics","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85077074680"
"Chatterji N.; Kiran R.","Chatterji, Niti (57194852542); Kiran, Ravi (22985431500)","57194852542; 22985431500","Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: A structural modelling perspective from north Indian universities","2017","International Journal of Educational Development","56","","","52","61","9","25","10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.004","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85023636877&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijedudev.2017.06.004&partnerID=40&md5=276e128281176ce5e64f99ce3b53b025","LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, Village- Behra, District- Mohali, Derabassi, 140507, Punjab, India; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar University, Patiala Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala, 147004, Punjab, India","Chatterji N., LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, Village- Behra, District- Mohali, Derabassi, 140507, Punjab, India; Kiran R., School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar University, Patiala Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala, 147004, Punjab, India","Authors propose a research framework that human capital of universities enhances performance through the mediating mechanisms of relational capital. Against the backdrop of the report issued by the National Knowledge Commission set up by the Indian government with a vision to transform India into a global knowledge hub, this study explores how universities can contribute in contriving a knowledge economy. Data collected from 13 north Indian universities has been tested empirically using structural equation modelling (SEM). Findings reveal that human capital has a significant influence on a university's performance and relational capital partially mediates that effect. The results of this study will be of paramount importance for planners in the Indian higher education sector to achieve the goals that have been laid down in the report. Furthermore, it will help administrators and policy makers at universities to take cognizance of the global shift towards the knowledge economy and leverage human and relational capital in the process. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd","Human capital; Intellectual capital; Organizational performance; Relational capital","India; higher education; human capital; knowledge economy; statistical analysis; university sector","","","","","","","Altbach P.G., Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: the role of research universities in developing countries, Stud. High. Educ., 38, 3, pp. 316-330, (2013); Ang J.B., Madsen J.B., Islam M.R., The effects of human capital composition on technological convergence, J. Macroecon., 33, pp. 465-476, (2011); Banerjee R., Roy S.S., Human capital, technological progress and trade: what explains India's long run growth?, J. Asian Econ., 30, pp. 15-31, (2014); Bano S., Taylor J., Universities and the knowledge-based economy: perceptions from a developing country, High. Educ. Res. Dev., 34, 2, pp. 242-255, (2015); Barro R.J., Economic growth in a cross section of countries, Q. J. Econ., 106, pp. 407-443, (1991); Bhagavatula S., Elfring T., Tilburg A.V., Bunt G.G.V.D., How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry, J. Bus. Venturing, 25, pp. 245-260, (2010); Bigliardi B., Dormio A.I., A balanced scorecard approach for R&D: evidence from a case study, Facilities, 28, 5-6, pp. 278-289, (2010); Bontis N., Keow W.C.C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in malaysian industries, J. Intellect. Cap., 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops, measures and models, Manage. Decis., 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bornay-Barrachina M., Lopez-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrera R., How do employment relationships enhance firm innovation? The role of human and social capital, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 28, 9, pp. 1363-1391, (2016); Brownlee J., Contract faculty in Canada: using access to information requests to uncover hidden academics in Canadian universities, High. Educ., 70, 5, pp. 787-805, (2015); Cabello-Medina C., Lopez-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrera R., Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 22, 4, pp. 807-828, (2011); Canibano L., Sanchez M.P., Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting, J. Hum. Resour. Cost. Account., 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Carmeli A., Strategic human capital and the performance of public sector organizations, Scand. J. Manage., 20, pp. 375-392, (2004); Caruana V., Re-thinking global citizenship in higher education: from cosmopolitanism and international mobility to cosmopolitanisation, resilience and resilient thinking, High. Educ. Q., 68, 1, pp. 85-104, (2014); Castro G.M., Lopez J.E.N., Saez P.L., Salazar E.A., Organizational capital as competitive advantage of the firm, J. Intellect. Cap., 7, 3, pp. 324-337, (2006); Chang D.F., Nyeu F.Y., Chang H.C., Balancing quality and quantity to build research universities in Taiwan, High. Educ., 70, 2, pp. 251-263, (2015); Chege M., Re-inventing Kenya's university: from a Graduate- Mill to a development oriented paradigm, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 44, pp. 21-27, (2015); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, J. Intellect. Cap., 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Dill D.D., Soo M., Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross- national analysis of university ranking systems, High. Educ., 49, 4, pp. 495-533, (2005); Dill D., University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units, High. Educ., 29, 4, pp. 369-384, (1995); Etkowitz H., University-industry-government: the triple helix model of innovation, EOQ Congresses Proceedings. 51st EOQ Congress, pp. 22-23, (2007); Ferrer J.L., Morris L., Engaging elitism: the mediating effect of work engagement on affective commitment and quit intentions in two australian university groups, High. Educ. Q., 67, 4, pp. 340-357, (2013); Fisher D., Grosjean J.A., Brokers on the boundary: academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities, High. Educ., 44, 3-4, pp. 449-467, (2002); French A.E., Academic capitalism in the age of globalization by Brendan Cantwell and IIkka Kauppinen (review), Rev. High. Educ., 39, 1, pp. 159-162, (2015); Gibbs P., Dean A., Troubling the notion of satisfied students, High. Educ. Q., 68, 4, pp. 416-431, (2014); Goldin C., The human-capital century and American leadership: virtues of the past, J. Econ. Hist., 61, pp. 263-292, (2001); Guzman-Valenzuela C., Unfolding the meaning of public(s) in universities: toward the transformative university, High. Educ., 71, 5, pp. 667-679, (2016); Haigh M., From internationalisation to education for global citizenship: a multi-layered history, High. Educ. Q., 68, 1, pp. 6-27, (2014); Hsiao C., Hsuan Y., Hsiang-Heng C., The effects of internal locus of control on entrepreneurship: the mediating mechanisms of social capital and human capital, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 27, 11, pp. 1158-1172, (2016); Hsu I.C., Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through Human capital: a preliminary test, Expert Syst. Appl., 35, pp. 1316-1326, (2008); Huang F., Building the world-class research universities: a case study of China, High. Educ., 70, 2, pp. 203-215, (2015); Jones J., Students’ views of the roles of a university, High. Educ., 8, 5, pp. 513-524, (1979); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance?, Harv. Bus. Rev., 70, 1, pp. 71-90, (1992); Karathanos D., Karathanos P., Applying the balanced scorecard to education, J. Educ. Bus., 80, 4, pp. 222-230, (2005); Kloot B., Exploring the value of Bourdieu's framework in the context of institutional change, Stud. High. Educ., 34, 4, pp. 469-481, (2009); Knobel M., Simoes T.P., Cruz H.D.B., International collaborations between research universities: experiences and best practices, Stud. High. Educ., 38, 3, pp. 405-424, (2013); Koening-Lewis N., Asaad Y., Petersone E., The effects of passage of time on alumni recall of ‘Student experience’, High. Educ. Q., 70, 1, pp. 59-80, (2016); Komnenic B., Pokrajcic D., Intellectual capital and corporate performance of MNCs in Serbia, J. Intellect. Cap., 13, 1, pp. 106-119, (2012); Lavado A.C., Rodriguez G.C., Medina C.C., Social and organizational capital: building the context for innovation, Ind. Market. Manage., 39, pp. 681-690, (2010); Lawrence J., Ott M., Bell A., Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship, Res. High. Educ., 53, 3, pp. 325-352, (2012); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Res. Eval., 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Liefner I., Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems, High. Educ., 46, 4, pp. 469-489, (2003); Lin S.C., Huang Y.M., The role of social capital in the relationship between human capital and career mobility. Moderator or mediator?, J. Intellect. Cap., 6, 2, pp. 191-205, (2005); Little A.W., Green A., Successful globalisation, education and sustainable development, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 29, 2, pp. 166-174, (2009); McDearmon J.T., Hail to thee, our alma mater: alumni role identity and the relationship to institutional support behaviors, Res. High. Educ., 54, 3, pp. 283-302, (2013); Mollis M., Marginson S., The assessment of universities in Argentina and Australia: between autonomy and heteronomy, High. Educ., 43, 3, pp. 311-330, (2002); Mondal A., Ghosh S.K., Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks, J. Intellect. Cap., 13, 4, pp. 515-530, (2012); Nadolny A., Ryan S., McUniversities revisited: a comparison of university and McDonald's casual employee experiences in Australia, Stud. High. Educ., 40, 1, pp. 142-157, (2015); Nerdrum L., Erikson T., Intellectual capital: a human capital perspective, J. Intellect. Cap., 2, 2, pp. 127-135, (2001); Nguyen T.H., Building human resources management capacity for university research: the case at four leading Vietnamese universities, High. Educ., 71, 2, pp. 231-251, (2016); Nielsen C., Cappelen K., Exploring the mechanisms of knowledge transfer in university- industry collaborations: a study of companies, students and researchers, High. Educ. Q., 68, 4, pp. 375-393, (2014); Ntimi N.M., Fongwa S.N., Wangenge-Ouma G., The scholarship of university- community engagement: interrogating Boyer's model, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 49, pp. 126-133, (2016); Nyerere J., Friso V., Forums for dialogue between university and industry. A case of Kenyatta University, Kenya and University of Padua, Italy, Eur. J. Train. Dev., 37, 7, pp. 662-677, (2013); Park H.J., Mitsuhashi H., Fey C.F., Bjorkman I., The effect of human resource management practices on Japanese MNC subsidiary performance: a partial mediating model, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 14, 8, pp. 1391-1406, (2003); Pedro E., Franco M., The importance of networks in the transnational mobility of higher education students: attraction and satisfaction of foreign mobility students at a public university, Stud. High. Educ., pp. 1-29, (2015); Pick D., Teo S., Yeung M., Friend or foe? new managerialism and technical, administrative and clerical support staff in australian universities, High. Educ. Q., 66, 1, pp. 3-23, (2012); Postiglione G.A., Arimoto A., Building research universities in east asia, High. Educ., 70, 2, pp. 151-153, (2015); Postiglione G.A., Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong's research universities: network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation, Stud. High. Educ., 38, 3, pp. 345-366, (2013); Powell W.W., Snellman K., The knowledge economy, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 30, pp. 199-220, (2004); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, J. Intellect. Cap., 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Rhoades G., Slaughter S., Academic capitalism in the new economy: challenges and choices, Am. Acad., 1, 1, pp. 37-59, (2004); Rowlands J., Academic boards: less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance?, Stud. High. Educ., 38, 9, pp. 1274-1289, (2013); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities. Improving transparency and internal management, J. Intellect. Cap., 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez R.G., Bolivar M.P.R., Lopez-Hernandez A.M., Online disclosure of university social responsibility: a comparative study of public and private US universities, Environ. Educat. Res., 19, 6, pp. 709-746, (2013); Scott P., The changing role of the university in the production of new knowledge, Tert. Educ. Manage., 3, 1, pp. 5-14, (1997); Sellers-Rubio R., Mas-Ruiz F.J., Casado-Diaz A.B., University efficiency: complementariness versus trade-off between teaching, research and administrative activities, High. Educ. Q., 64, 4, pp. 373-391, (2010); Sevriens S., Meeuwisse M., Born M., Student experience and academic success: comparing a student- centred and a lecture based course programme, High. Educ., 70, 1, pp. 1-17, (2015); Shah M., Nair S., The influence of strategy and external quality audit on university performance: an australian perspective, Tert. Educ. Manage., 17, 2, pp. 139-150, (2011); Shin J.C., Lee S.J., Evolution of research universities as a national research system in Korea: accomplishments and challenges, High. Educ., 70, 2, pp. 187-202, (2015); Shin J.C., Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: a performance- based approach, High. Educ., 57, 2, pp. 247-266, (2009); Shin J.C., Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S, High. Educ., 60, 1, pp. 47-68, (2010); Spiro J., Learning interonnectedness: internationalisation through engagement with one another, High. Educ. Q., 68, 1, pp. 65-84, (2014); Stephenson A.L., Heckert A., Yerger D.B., College choice and the university brand: exploring the consumer decision framework, High. Educ., 71, 4, pp. 489-503, (2016); Tadaki M., Tremewan C., Reimagining internationalization in higher education: international consortia as a transformative space?, Stud. High. Educ., 38, 3, pp. 367-387, (2013); Tamer I., Dereli B., Saglam M., Unorthodox forms of capital in organizations: positive psychological capital, intellectual capital and social capital, Soc. Behav. Sci., 152, pp. 963-972, (2014); Tasker M., Packham D., Industry and higher education: a question of values, Stud. High. Educ., 18, 2, pp. 127-136, (1993); Taylor M., Shared governance in the modern university, High. Educ. Q., 67, 1, pp. 80-94, (2013); Temple P., Creating social capital: the impact of international programmes on polish and romanian higher education, Tert. Educ. Manage., 12, 1, pp. 1-20, (2006); Teodorescu D., Institutional researchers as knowledge managers in universities: envisioning new roles for the IR profession, Tert. Educ. Manage., 12, 1, pp. 75-88, (2006); Tirronen J., Nokkala T., Structural development of finnish universities: achieving competitiveness and academic excellence, High. Educ. Q., 63, 3, pp. 219-236, (2009); Townsend T., Pisapia J., Razzaq J., Fostering interdisciplinary research in universities: a case study of leadership, alignment and support, Stud. High. Educ., 40, 4, pp. 658-675, (2015); Umashankar V., Dutta K., Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: an Indian perspective, Int. J. Educ. Manage., 21, 1, pp. 54-67, (2007); Utulu S.C., Okoye M.A., Application of social capital theory to Nigerian university web sites, Electron. Lib., 28, 1, pp. 171-183, (2010); Vishnu S., Gupta V.K., Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India, J. Intellect. Cap., 15, 1, pp. 83-99, (2014); Weerts D.J., Cabrera A.F., Sanford T., Beyond giving: political advocacy and volunteer behaviors of public university alumni, Res. High. Educ., 51, 4, pp. 346-365, (2010); Yonezawa A., Shimmi Y., Transformation of University Governance Through Internationalization: Challenges for Top Universities and Government Policies in Japan, 70, pp. 173-186, (2015); Yu M.L., Hamid S., Ijab M.T., Soo H.P., The e- balanced scorecard (e-BSC) for measuring academic staff performance excellence, High. Educ., 57, 6, pp. 813-828, (2009); Zangoueinezhad A., Moshabaki A., Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manage., 60, 8, pp. 824-843, (2011); Zavale N.C., Macamo E., How and what knowledge do universities and academics transfer to industry in African low-income countries? Evidence from the stage of university-industry linkages in Mozambique, Int. J. Educ. Dev., 49, pp. 247-261, (2016); Zhang Y., O'Halloran K.L., ‘Toward a global knowledge enterprise’: university websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education, Crit. Discour. Stud., 10, 4, pp. 468-485, (2013)","N. Chatterji; LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, Derabassi, Village- Behra, District- Mohali, 140507, India; email: niti.chatterji@thapar.edu","","Elsevier Ltd","","","","","","07380593","","","","English","Int. J. Educ. Dev.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85023636877"
"Unegbu A.O.","Unegbu, Angus O. (57079079700)","57079079700","Redefining, measuring and disclosure of faculty intellectual capital","2016","International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital","13","1","","50","71","21","2","10.1504/IJLIC.2016.074345","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84955599737&doi=10.1504%2fIJLIC.2016.074345&partnerID=40&md5=1ea867f3315b30990b3639ed0e3b1617","Department of Business and Management Sciences, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Kurdistan Region, Iraq","Unegbu A.O., Department of Business and Management Sciences, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Kurdistan Region, Iraq","Defining a model for measuring, managing and disclosing faculty intellectual capital in corporate financial statements has not yet gained general acceptance. This study aims at evaluating the current faculty performance measurement related issues, managing and ways of disclosing faculty intellectual capital there are abound in universities in financial statements and to seek a rethink on adoption of a new model in this regard. The model is anchored on the precepts of activity-based-costing but reinvigorated with new variables that positions current-activity-based-costing (CABC) model as upcoming faculty performance motivating technique of measurement, managing and disclosure for the corporate good. It is stipulated after highlighting the deficits of current methods used in universities. A survey of faculty views on the new model was carried out. The outcome of the survey correlates positively to stipulations of the new model as future faculty performance definition, managing and disclosure in universities, although the outcome of the survey significantly modified the model construct. The study conceptualises a new framework for understanding the components of faculty intellectual capital, the best means of measurements, managing and means of their disclosure in the financial statements. Copyright © 2016 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.","ABC; Activity-based costing; Faculty performance measurements; HRA; Human resource accounting; Intellectual capital redefinition","","","","","","","","Abhayawansa S., Guthrie J., Importance of intellectual capital information: A study of Australian analyst reports, Australian Accounting Review, 24, 68, pp. 66-83, (2014); An Y., Davey H., Eggleton I.R.C., The effects of industry type, company size and performance on Chinese companies' IC disclosure: A research note, Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal (AAFBJ), 5, 3, pp. 107-116, (2011); Asare N., Arku S.J., Onumah M.J., Intellectual capital disclosures in Ghana: The views of stakeholders, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5, 18, pp. 51-63, (2014); Beach M.J., A critique of human capital formation in the U.S. and the economic returns to sub-baccalaureate credentials, Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies, 45, 1, pp. 24-38, (2009); Becker G.S., Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, (1964); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models, Journal of Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5-8, pp. 433-462, (1999); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, pp. 621-642, (2002); Bontis N., Chua W.C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Brignall S., A contingent rationale for cost system design in service, Management Accounting Research, 8, 1, pp. 325-346, (1997); Brooking A., Intellectual Capital. Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise, (1996); Casey N.H., Integrated higher learning-an investment in intellectual capital for livestock production, Livestock Science, 130, 1, pp. 83-94, (2010); Chea C.A., Activity-based costing system in the service sector: A strategic approach for enhancing managerial decision making and competitiveness, International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 11, pp. 3-10, (2011); Chiucchi S.M., Intellectual capital accounting in action: Enhancing learning through interventionist research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 48-68, (2013); Cooper R., Kaplan R.S., Measure cost right: Make the right decisions, Harvard Business Review, September-October, 66, 5, pp. 96-102, (1988); Cooper R., Kaplan R.S., Profit priorities from activity based costing, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 3, 69, pp. 130-135, (1991); Cuganesan S., Intellectual capital-in-action and value creation. A case study of knowledge transformation in an innovation process, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 3, pp. 357-373, (2005); Dae-Borg K., Human capital and its measurement, The 3rd OECD World Forum on 'Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, (2009); De La Fuente A., Ciccone A., Human Capital in A Global and Knowledge-Based Economy, (2002); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Eigbiremolen O.G., Anaduaka S.U., Human capital development and economic growth: The Nigeria experience, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4, 4, pp. 25-35, (2014); Ejere S.I., Human capital formation as catalyst for national development: Nigeria in perspective, International Business and Management, 2, 2, pp. 98-104, (2011); Emblemsvag J., Activity-based lifecycle costing, Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 1, pp. 17-27, (2001); Engstrom T.E.J., Westnes P., Westnes F.S., Evaluating intellectual capital in the hotel industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 3, pp. 287-303, (2003); Fernandez P., Three Residual Income Valuation Methods and Discounted Cash Flow Valuation, (2003); Fernstrom L., Pike S., Roos G., Understanding the truly value creating resources - The case of a pharmaceutical company, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 105-120, (2004); Fitz-Enz J., ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employees Performance, (2000); Fitzsimons P., Human Capital Theory and Education. The Encyclopedia of Education, (1999); Flamholtz E., Bullen M., Hua W., Human resources accounting: A historical perspective and future implication, Management Decision, 40, 10, pp. 947-954, (2002); Giuliani M., Not all sunshine and roses: Investigating intellectual liabilities ""in action, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 127-144, (2013); Giuliani M., Investigating intellectual capital dynamics: A field study, Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 20-32, (2014); Gosselin M., The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 2, pp. 105-122, (1997); Jawahar L., Corporate Financial Reporting, Theory and Practice Case, pp. 280-302, (2009); Johnson A.O., Human capital development & economic growth: Empirical evidence from Nigeria, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2, 7, pp. 813-827, (2011); Khalique M., Jamal S.A.N., Abu I.H., Intellectual capital and its major components, International Journal of Current Research, 3, 6, pp. 343-347, (2011); Kianto A., What do we really mean by the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital?, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4, 4, pp. 342-356, (2007); Klein D.A., Prusak L., Characterising Intellectual Capital, (1994); Kok A., Intellectual capital management as part of knowledge management initiatives at institutions of higher learning, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 2, pp. 181-192, (2007); Krishnan A., An application of activity based costing in higher learning institution: A local case study, Contemporary Management Research, 2, 2, pp. 75-90, (2006); Leitner K.-H., O'Donnell D., Conceptualizing IC management in R&D organizations: Future scenarios from the complexity theory perspective, Intellectual Capital Revised, pp. 78-99, (2007); Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.G., Naturalistic Inquiry, (1985); Lytras M.D., Ordonez De Pablos P., Competencies and human resource management: Implications for organizational competitive advantage, Special Issue on Competencies Management: Integrating Semantic Web and Technology Enhanced Learning Approaches for Effective Knowledge Management, Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 6, pp. 48-55, (2008); Lytras M.D., Ordonez De Pablos P., The role of a ""make"" or internal human resource management system in Spanish manufacturing companies: Empirical evidence, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18, 4, pp. 464-479, (2008); Mariano S., Understanding the nature of knowledge: An empirical study of knowledge sharing in a knowledge intensive organization, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 151-164, (2013); Marr B., Schiuma G., Neely A., Intellectual capital: Defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets, Business Process Management Journal, 10, 5, pp. 551-569, (2004); McNair C.J., Polutnik L., Cost management and value creation: The missing link, The European Accounting Review, 10, 1, pp. 33-50, (2001); Meritum, Proyecto Meritum: Guidelines for Managing and Reporting Intangibles, (2002); Michalisin M., Kline D.M., Smith R.D., Intangible strategic assets and firm performance - A multi-industry study of the resource-based view, Journal of Business Strategies, 17, 2, pp. 91-117, (2000); Milost F., Is the intellectual capital accounting just a management fashion?, International Business, Management and Economics Research, 4, 4, pp. 759-765, (2013); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: Ostensive versus performative IC, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Mouritsen J., Larsen H.T., The 2nd wave of knowledge management: The management control of knowledge resources through intellectual capital information, Management Accounting Research, 16, 3, pp. 371-394, (2005); Okojie C.E.E., Human capital formation for productivity growth in Nigeria, Nigerian Economic and Financial Review, pp. 44-55, (1995); Ordonez De Pablos P., Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital in Organizations: Non-Financial Reports and Accounts, (2014); Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), The Knowledge-Based Economy, (1996); Paoloni P.D.P., Implementing an intellectual capital framework in practice, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 69-83, (2013); Rahaman M., Hossain A., Akter T., Problem with human resource accounting and possible solution, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4, 18, pp. 1-10, (2013); Ramirez Y., Intellectual capital models in Spanish public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 248-264, (2010); Rastogi P.N., Knowledge management and intellectual capital as a paradigm of value creation, Human Systems Management, 21, 4, pp. 229-240, (2002); Renzl B., Intellectual capital reporting at universities - The Austrian approach, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3, 3, pp. 293-309, (2006); Romer P.M., Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5, pp. 71-102, (1990); Roos G., Roos J., Measuring your company's intellectual performance, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 413-426, (1997); Rosen H.S., Public Finance, (1999); Sarbapriya R., Relevance and applicability of activity based costing: An appraisal, Journal of Expert Systems (JES), 1, 3, pp. 71-78, (2012); Schultz T.W., Investment in human capital, American Economic Review, 51, 1, pp. 1-17, (1961); Skandia, Supplement to the Annual Report, Customer Value, (1996); Sonnier B.M., Intellectual capital disclosure: High-tech versus traditional sector companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 4, pp. 705-722, (2008); Steffy B.D., Maurer S.D., Conceptualizing and measuring the economic effectiveness of human resource activities, Academy of Management Review, 13, pp. 271-288, (1988); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Sveiby K.-E., The New Organisational Wealth, (1997); Swart J., Intellectual capital: Disentangling an enigmatic concept, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 2, pp. 136-159, (2006); Turney P.B., Using activity-based costing to achieve manufacturing excellence, Journal of Cost Management, 3, 2, pp. 23-31, (2009); Vishnani S., Shah B.K., Value relevance of published financial statements-with special emphasis on impact of cash flow reporting, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 17, pp. 84-90, (2008); Wiig K.M., Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management, Long Range Planning, 3, 3, pp. 399-405, (1997)","A.O. Unegbu; Department of Business and Management Sciences, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Kurdistan Region, Iraq; email: unegbu4@yahoo.com","","Inderscience Publishers","","","","","","14794853","","","","English","Int. J. Learn. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84955599737"
"Indiyati D.","Indiyati, Dian (57188970429)","57188970429","Intellectual capital development in higher education in Indonesia","2015","International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research","13","7","","6033","6051","18","2","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964381101&partnerID=40&md5=45f8ca4ba47c203a29f68c75dc42a37c","Faculty of Economics, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia","Indiyati D., Faculty of Economics, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia","In the level of competition in the management of universities, Private Higher Educations are required to have a competitive advantage that can improve the performance, one of which is the presence of a high intellectual capital, which can provide more value for customers. This study aims to assess and analyze the intellectual capital of the private universities at Kopertis Region IV. This study is a qualitative-descriptive survey. The populations is private universities at Kopertis Region IV, while the samplesis 157 private universities at Kopertis Region IV, which is obtained by using proportional probability sampling technique, where the sample size is determined using power analysis-power test approach. Data collected by observation, interview and questionnaire that have been tested for validity and reliability. Results of this study concluded that the private universities have a valuable intellectual capital, which means that private universities have a valuable human capital, sufficient quality of structural capital, and quite valuable customer capital, so that they have sufficient ability to provide more value for customers.","Customer Capital; Human Capital; Intellectual Capital; Structural Capital","","","","","","","","Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An explorety study that develops measures and models, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, (2002); Cascio W.F., Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profts, (2003); Davis K., Human Resources and Personnel Management, (1996); Mondy W.R., Noe R.M., Human Resource Management, (2006); Panggabean M.S., Human Resources Management, (2004); Robbins S.P., Organizational Behavior, (2011); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital, (1997); Ulrich D., Human Resources Champion: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Result, (1998); Knowledge and Innovation Platform Power of Competitiveness, (2010); Amiri A.N., Jandghi G., Seyed M.A., Hosnavi R., Ramezan M., Increasing the intellectual capital in oraganization: Examining the role of organizational learning, European Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 1, pp. 98-108, (2010); Rojas A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, (2007); Balkaoui R., Intellectual capital and firm performance of us multinational firms, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 2, (2003); Bontis N., Keow W.C., Richardson S., Intllectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Boudreau J.W., Ramstad P.M., Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy defnition, The Future of Human Resources Management, 44, 2, pp. 129-136, (2005); Burr R., Girrardi A., Intellectual capital : More than the interaction of competence and commitment, Australian Journal of Management, 27, 1, pp. 77-88, (2002); Carlucci D., Marr B., The knowledge value chain : How intellectual capital impacts on business performance, Int Journal of Technology Management, 27, 6, (2004); Curado C., Bontis N., Managing intellectual capital: The MIC matrix, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3, 2-3, pp. 316-328, (2007); Gengaje A.F.R., Human Development Report-Global Launch, Global Implications, (2014); Hsu H., Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital, (2006); Huang K.T., Capitalization on intellectual assets, IBM System Journal, 37, 4, pp. 570-584, (2010); Hunter L., Wyat W.E., Measuring intangible capital : A review of current practice, Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, 16, 4, pp. 1-46, (2005); Indiyati D., An infuence of organizational culture and knowledge management toward the competitive advantage, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities-Sosiohumaniora, 16, 2, pp. 193-200, (2014); Indiyati D., The Importance of Organizational Culture on Intellectual Capital, Proceeding ICOI, (2014); Kavida V., Sivakoumar, Intellectual capital: A strategic management perspective, The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 6, pp. 97-106, (2009); Kuang S.H., Chia J.C., Lin B., Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, (2010); Lim L.L.K., Dallimore P., Intellectual capital: Management atitudes in service industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 1, pp. 181-194, (2004); Martin A.D., Competence of Human Resources: New Trends Model Revitalization of Human Resources, (2002); Melinda T., Department of International Business Management, (2008); Nahapiet J., Goshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Sanchez S.M., Angel Ayuso Munoz M., Lopez Guzman T., Organizational culture and intellectual capital a new model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2007); Sari E.V., The Economy Is Slowing, Unemployment in Indonesia to Grow, (2015); Susanto A., Unemployment Scholar Booming, Troubled Student-Productive Age Domination Unemploymentin Indonesia, (2015); Stewart T.A., Intellectual capital-the new wealth of organization, Business Digest, 300, pp. 1-10, (1997); Sugeng I., Measuring and managing of intellectual capital, Journal of Ecomomic and Business Indonesia-Gajah Mada University, (2005); Sule E.T., Creating Higher Education Sustainable Development Through Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management to Strengthen Competitiveness Higher Education in Indonesia, (2009); Zhou A.Z., Fink D., The intellectual capital web: A systematic linking of intellectual capital and knowledge management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 1, pp. 34-48, (2003)","D. Indiyati; Faculty of Economics, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia; email: dianinds@yahoo.com","","Serials Publications","","","","","","09727302","","","","English","Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84964381101"
"Maity A.; Sahu N.B.","Maity, Asish (57208905694); Sahu, Nivedita Bhattacharyya (57208175032)","57208905694; 57208175032","Bibliometric Study Of Selected Lis Journals Published Online In The 21st Century","2020","Library Philosophy and Practice","2020","","","","","","0","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099511964&partnerID=40&md5=55893c6e34d7c59ae61e26c31765303a","Yogoda Satsanga Palpara Mahavidyalaya, Palpara, India; Vidyasagar University, India","Maity A., Yogoda Satsanga Palpara Mahavidyalaya, Palpara, India; Sahu N.B., Vidyasagar University, India","This paper is a study of the LIS journals published by Emerald group of publications which originated online in the 21st century upto the year 2015. Five such journals include Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM), Journal of Intellectual Capital(JIC), Online Information Review (OIR), Performance Measurement and Metrics (PMM) and Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (JICES). Highest publication is by OIR and 2009 produced most articles followed by 2008. Research paper tops the list in all the five journals. Single authored papers are predominant followed by two authored papers. Authors from UK contribute maximum numbers of papers and most papers have been contributed from Brunel University, UK followed by University of Hawaii, USA. Authors repeat contributions to the same journal. No author among the top-ranking authors is found to be writing for any other journal among the five journals except Bar-Ilan J. In 2005 most citations are received in the three journals except OIR and JICES where articles published in 2009 received most citations. A six-authored paper in JEIM received most citations followed by a single authored paper in the JIC. The average article length mostly ranges from 16-20 pages in all the three journals except PMM and JICES where it ranges from 11-15 pages. 59 unique keywords appear in the journals and eight keywords are repetitive. Contributions by Indians are negligible. The journals are found to have varied aims and scope and accept articles of varied interest. © 2020, Library Philosophy and Practice. All Rights Reserved.","21<sup>st</sup> century; Bibliometric study; Citation count; Emerald group; LIS Journals; Online journals","","","","","","","","Bala M., Singh M. P., A Scientometric Study of Journal of Bio-Chemistry and Bio-Physics (IJBB), Library Philosophy and practice, (2014); Davarpanah M. R., Aslekia S., A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics, Scientometrics, 77, 1, pp. 21-39, (2008); Fay S., Gautrias S., A scientometric study of General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology from 2000 to 2012, (2015); Hiremath R., Hadagali S. G., A Scientometric study of nanocomposites: a global perspective, International Journal of Library Science and Research (IJLSR), 4, 3, pp. 29-40, (2014); Huang M. H., Yang H. W., A scientometric study of fuel cell based on paper and patent analysis, Journal of Library and Information Studies, 11, 2, pp. 1-24, (2013); Jesubright J. J., A Scientometric Analysis of Global Forensic Science Research Publications, Library Philosophy and practice, (2014); Jeyasekar J. J., Saravanan P., A Scientometric Portrait of the Journal Digital Investigation, Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 3, 2, pp. 155-162, (2014); Kavitha M., Venkatesan M. N., Analysis of Google Scholar Top Rated Journals with Special Reference to the Journal “Nature, International Journal of Advanced Library and Information Science, 1, 1, pp. 01-06, (2013); Singh J. K., A Scientometric analysis of “Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics” (2006-2010): A study based on Web of Science, Research Journal of Library Sciences, (2014); Velmurugan C., Radhakrishnan N., A Scientometric Analysis of Research Papers Published on Pharmacognosy as reflected in theWeb of Science, Advances in Pharmacognosy and Phytomedicine, 1, 1, pp. 27-40, (2015); Young L., Wilkinson I., Smith A., A Scientometric Analysis of Publications in the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1993-2014, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 22, 1-2, pp. 111-123, (2015)","A. Maity; Yogoda Satsanga Palpara Mahavidyalaya, Palpara, India; email: maityasish@gmail.com","","University of Idaho Library","","","","","","15220222","","","","English","Libr. Philos. Pract.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85099511964"
"Mercader V.; Galván-Vela E.; Ravina-Ripoll R.; Popescu C.R.G.","Mercader, Víctor (57286627300); Galván-Vela, Esthela (57220863350); Ravina-Ripoll, Rafael (57204642774); Popescu, Cristina Raluca Gh. (16231204800)","57286627300; 57220863350; 57204642774; 16231204800","A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity","2021","Journal of Risk and Financial Management","14","11","522","","","","11","10.3390/jrfm14110522","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130939925&doi=10.3390%2fjrfm14110522&partnerID=40&md5=382270ba7252e058c4d1d628681e7990","Graduate School of Business, CETYS Universidad, Av. Cetys Universidad No. 4, Fracc. El Lago, Baja California, Tijuana, C.P. 22210, Mexico; Center of Excellence in Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship, School of Business and Administration, CETYS Universidad, Av. Cetys Universidad No. 4, Fracc. El Lago, Baja California, Tijuana, 22210, Mexico; Department of Business Organization and INDESS, University of Cádiz, Jerez de la Frontera, 11405, Spain; Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, 030018, Romania; Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Economics I Doctoral School, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, 010374, Romania; Department of Natural and Technological Hazards, The National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (INCDPM), Bucharest, 060031, Romania; The National Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines COMOTI (INCDT COMOTI), Bucharest, 061126, Romania","Mercader V., Graduate School of Business, CETYS Universidad, Av. Cetys Universidad No. 4, Fracc. El Lago, Baja California, Tijuana, C.P. 22210, Mexico; Galván-Vela E., Center of Excellence in Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship, School of Business and Administration, CETYS Universidad, Av. Cetys Universidad No. 4, Fracc. El Lago, Baja California, Tijuana, 22210, Mexico; Ravina-Ripoll R., Department of Business Organization and INDESS, University of Cádiz, Jerez de la Frontera, 11405, Spain; Popescu C.R.G., Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, 030018, Romania, Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Economics I Doctoral School, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, 010374, Romania, Department of Natural and Technological Hazards, The National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (INCDPM), Bucharest, 060031, Romania, The National Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines COMOTI (INCDT COMOTI), Bucharest, 061126, Romania","The new economy and the knowledge-based society brought significant changes in all the areas of our daily lives. Also, the COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 crisis implicated tremendous transformations in all the domains, on the one hand, threatening the balance of our society and, on the other hand, challenging the dynamic of the new economy development and the rhythm of the societal modernization. In these delicate times, the all-important relationship between ethics, leadership, teamwork, effective communication, productivity, and performance is brought to the attention, in particular, due to its benefits for our society, taking into consideration the pivotal advancement that a well governed relationship of this type could provide to the knowledge-based economy. The present research describes the implication of ethics in leadership, teamwork, effective communication, and productivity, which includes the application of ethical values as university graduates assume the role of each of the mentioned dimensions of study in the organizations. The absence of research that relates ethics to these four elements simultaneously was noticed. This information is essential to know how these dimensions influence the organizational level. The sample that included 410 university graduates was applied in Baja California, Mexico, and the industrial nucleus of great relevance, bordering California in the United States of America. The data was obtained using a questionnaire. A reliability and validity analysis of the measurement instrument was carried out in terms of the ethical values associated with the dimensions mentioned using the exploratory factor analysis by the principal components method. Qualitative items were also analyzed using the constant comparison method. The results obtained in this research provide a greater perspective and practical knowledge and support of usefulness and practical reality to businesspeople and employees, leaders and university graduates; and also extensive to students, teachers, and human beings in general, in order to be better prepared to give and apply solutions with their consequent ethical and productive achievements desired by all. Additionally, this current research has the purpose to raise the will to understand, at a higher level and at a more in-depth degree of knowledge, the relationship between ethics, leadership, teamwork, effective communication, productivity, and performance, in the attempt to foster a creative and innovative business environment, based on a robust and sustainable business administration and business competencies, capable to position at higher ranks the strengths, opportunities, aspirations and outcomes that today’s new economy is due to offer and diminish the dangerous effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 crisis in all the domains. © 2021 by the authors.","accounting; audit; Barlett’s sphericity test; business administration; business competencies; business counseling; business environments; corporate governance; COVID-19 pandemic; creativity; Cronbach’s alpha indicator; economic and financial analysis; economic growth; economics; effective business communication; effective communication; effectiveness; empirical analysis; entrepreneurial competencies; entrepreneurship; environmental protection; ethics; exploratory analysis; exploratory factors; fiscally responsible businesses; human capital; human resources management; innovative business models; intangible assets; integrative strategies; intellectual capital; Kaiser-Meyer Olkin (KMO) test; knowledge-based society; leadership; Likert scale; management; mindfulness; performance; performance management; private sector; productivity; public sector; qualitative analysis; quantitative analysis; questionnaire; skewness and kurtosis calculations; statistical correlations; statistics; study sample; sustainability; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); teamwork; Varimax rotation; voluntarist theory","","","","","","","","Akerblad L., Seppanen-Jarvela R., Haapakoski K., Integrative Strategies in Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15, pp. 152-170, (2020); Alvi A.K., Kayani U.S., Mir G.M., Relationship of Employee Training, Employee Empowerment, Teamwork with Job Satisfaction, Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 7, pp. 185-198, (2020); Alyammahi A., Alshurideh M., Kurdi B.A., Salloum S.A., The impacts of communication ethics on workplace decision making and productivity, International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 488-500, (2020); Amiridis K., The shadow of Sophocles: Tragedy and the ethics of leadership, Business Ethics Quarterly, 28, pp. 15-29, (2018); Arshad M., Abid G., Torres F.V.C., Impact of prosocial motivation on organisational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of ethical leadership and leader-member exchange, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, pp. 1-18, (2020); Arulraj D.J., Annamalai T.R., Firms’ Financing Choices and Firm Productivity: Evidence from an Emerging Economy, International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 15, pp. 35-48, (2020); Askari G., Asghri N., Gordji M.E., Asgari H., Filipe J.A., Azar A., The impact of teamwork on an organization’s performance: A cooperative game’s approach, Mathematics, 8, (2020); Bachmann B., Literature review: The evolution of ethical leadership, Ethical Leadership in Organizations, pp. 27-63, (2017); Bauman D.C., Platoon moral leadership: An ancient model for modern business, Business Ethics Quarterly, 28, pp. 251-274, (2018); Berkovich I., Eyal O., Ethics education in leadership development: Adopting multiple ethical paradigms, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48, pp. 270-285, (2018); Berrone P., Surroca J., Tribo J.A., Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance: A test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction, Journal of Business Ethics, 76, pp. 35-53, (2007); Biong H., Nygaard A., Silkoset R., The influence of retail management’s use of social power on corporate ethical values, employee commitment, and performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, pp. 341-363, (2010); Borzel T.A., Why there is no ‘southern problem’. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union, Journal of European Public Policy, 7, pp. 141-162, (2000); Bosch M., Cavalotti R., ¿Es posible una definición de integridad en el ámbito de ética empresarial?, Empresa y Humanismo, 19, pp. 51-68, (2016); Boynton L.A., What we value: A Delphi study to identify key values that guide ethical decision-making in public relations, Public Relations Review, 32, pp. 325-330, (2006); Brown A., The Myth of the Strong Leader: Political Leadership in the Modern Age, (2014); Burr C., Taddeo M., Floridi L., The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review, Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, pp. 2313-2343, (2020); Carroll A.B., A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, Academy of Management Review, 4, pp. 497-505, (1979); Chen N.Y.-F., Xie H.Y., Tjosvold D., The Role of Constructive Controversy for Team Support and Team Productivity: Managing Teams in China, Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 18, pp. 67-78, (2017); Chen Y., Zhou X., Klyver K., Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment, Journal of Business Ethics, 159, pp. 587-603, (2019); Choi S.B., Kim K., Kang S.-W., Effects of transformational and shared leadership styles on employees’ perception of team effectiveness, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45, pp. 377-386, (2017); Ciulla J.B., Verizon Lecture: Why Is It So Difficult to Be an Ethical Leader?, Business and Society Review, 123, pp. 369-383, (2018); Cole M.L., Cox J.D., Stavros J.M., OAR as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Collaboration Among Professionals Working in Teams: Implications for Entrepreneurial Teams, Special Collection-Entrepreneurial Teams: Towards a Contextualized Understanding, 8, pp. 1-12, (2018); Cosans C.E., Reina C.S., The leadership ethics of Machiavelli’s prince, Business Ethics Quarterly, 28, pp. 275-300, (2018); Cots E.G., Stakeholder social capital: A new approach to stakeholder theory, Business Ethics: A European Review, 20, pp. 328-341, (2011); Crane D.R., Busby D.M., Larson J.H., A factor analysis of the dyadic adjustment scale with distressed and nondistressed couples, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, pp. 60-66, (1991); Cronin T.E., Genovese M.A., Leadership Matters: Unleashing the Power of Paradox, (2012); Cuesta-Valino P., Serra-Cantallops A., Ramon-Cardona J., Ravina-Ripoll R., China Viewed by the West before COVID-19: Spaniards’ Perceptions and Knowledge of China as a Tourist Destination, Land, 10, (2021); Davenport T.H., Prusak L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, (1998); Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., Mayer R.C., Tan H.H., The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 563-576, (2000); Di Pietrantonio J., Neilan R.M., Schreiber J.B., Assessing the impact of motivation and ability on team-based productivity using an agent-based model, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 25, pp. 499-520, (2019); Dimitrakopoulos D.G., Collective Leadership in Leaderless Europe: A Sceptical View, Leaderless Europe, pp. 288-312, (2008); Dinan D., Governance and Institutions: A More Political Commission, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, pp. 101-116, (2016); Duc L.A., Tho N.D., Nakandala D., Lan Y.-C., Team innovation in retail services: The role of ambidextrous leadership and team learning, Service Business, 14, pp. 167-186, (2020); Duhacek Sebestova J., Palova Z., Kantor P., Beck V., Non-Profit Organization Involvement Into the Sustainable Development Goals, Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 158-179, (2021); Durr O., Nisch M., Rohlfing-Bastian A., Incentives in optimally sized teams for projects with uncertain returns, Review of Accounting Studies, 25, pp. 313-341, (2020); Ebert P., Freibichler W., Nudge management: Applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity, Journal of Organization Design, 6, pp. 1-6, (2017); Ejohwomu O.A., Oshodi O.S., Lam K.C., Nigeria’s construction industry: Barriers to effective communication, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24, pp. 652-667, (2017); Elango B., Paul K., Kundu S., Paudel S., Organizational Ethics, Individual Ethics, and Ethical Intentions in International Decision- Making, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, pp. 543-561, (2010); Elgie R., Studying Political Leadership: Foundations and Contending Accounts, (2015); Elias Zambrano R., Jimenez-Marin G., Galiano-Coronil A., Ravina-Ripoll R., Children, Media and Food. A New Paradigm in Food Advertising, Social Marketing and Happiness Management, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, (2021); Elms H., Brammer S., Harris J.D., Phillips R., New Directions in Strategic Management and Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, pp. 401-425, (2010); Elson R.J., Ingram P., Wells Fargo and the unauthorized customer accounts: A case study, Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, 2, pp. 607-639, (2018); Epstein E.M., Business ethics, corporate good citizenship and the corporate social policy process: A view from the United States, Journal of Business Ethics, 8, pp. 583-595, (1989); Espoir D.K., Ngepah N., The effects of inequality on total factor productivity across districts in South Africa: A spatial econometric analysis, GeoJournal, pp. 1-32, (2020); Reflection Paper towards a Sustainable Europe by 2030, (2019); Fatien-Diochon P., Defiebre-Muller R., Viola F., Toward an “Ethics of Serendipity”: Disrupting Normative Ethical Discourses in Organizations, Human Resource Development Review, 17, pp. 373-392, (2018); Fichter R., Do the Right Thing! Developing Ethical Behavior in Financial Institutions, Journal Business Ethics, 151, pp. 69-84, (2018); Figar N., Dordevic B., Managing an ethical dilemma, Economics Themes, 54, pp. 345-362, (2016); Flores-Szwagrzak K., Treibich R., Teamwork and Individual Productivity, Management Science, 66, pp. 2523-2544, (2020); Foncubierta-Rodriguez M.-J., Ravina-Ripoll R., Lopez-Sanchez J.A., Generational Portrait of Spanish Society in the Face of Climate Change. A Question to Consider for the Green Economy under the Well-Being Approach, Energies, 14, (2021); Francis R., Armstrong A., Ethics as a risk management strategy: The Australian experience, Journal of Business Ethics, 45, pp. 375-385, (2003); Fritz J.M.H., Arnett R.C., Conkel M., Organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment, Journal of Business Ethics, 20, pp. 289-299, (1999); Galvan-Vela E., Herrera E.A., Rodriguez D.M.S., Ravina-Ripoll R., State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14, (2021); Gandy R., Mulhearn C., Allowing for unemployment in productivity measurement, SN Business & Economics, 1, (2021); Garcia Guerrero J.E., Lopez R.R., Gonzalez A.L., Ceular-Villamandos N., Indigenous Peoples, Exclusion and Precarious Work: Design of Strategies to Address Poverty in Indigenous and Peasant Populations in Ecuador through the SWOT-AHP Methodology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, (2021); Geyskens I., Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Kumar N., Generalizations about Trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, pp. 223-248, (1998); Giacalone R.A., Jurkiewicz C.L., Right from Wrong: The Influence of Spirituality on Perceptions of Unethical Business Activities, Journal of Business Ethics, 46, pp. 85-97, (2003); Goetz K.H., Political Leadership in the European Union: A Time-Centred View, European Political Science, 16, pp. 48-59, (2017); Gonzalez A.L., Alkorta A.B., Salcedo J.L.O., The Social and Solidarity Economics, Public Policies, and Non-Monetary Economic Practices: The Case of Associative Firms in Loja, Ecuador, Handbook of Research on Emerging Business Models and the New World Economic Order, pp. 242-266, (2022); Graboa A., Spisak B., van Vugta M., Charisma as signal: An evolutionary perspective on charismatic leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 28, pp. 473-485, (2017); Grant R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 7, pp. 109-122, (1996); Green C., Why Trust Is the New Core of Leadership, (2012); Grint K., Jones O.S., Holt C., What Is Leadership: Person, Result, Position or Process, or All or None of These?, The Routledge Companion to Leadership, pp. 3-20, (2016); Grozdic V., Maric B., Radisic M., Sebestova J., Lis M., Capital Investments and Manufacturing Firms’ Performance: Panel-Data Analysis, Sustainability, 12, (2020); Guerrero-Miranda P., Gonzalez A.L., Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, (2021); Guo W., Clougherty J.A., Cross-border acquisition activity by Chinese multinationals and domestic-productivity upgrading, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 1-36, (2020); Haarhaus B., Uncovering cognitive and affective sources of satisfaction homogeneity in work teams, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, pp. 646-668, (2018); Haslam S.A., Reicher S.D., Platow M.J., The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power, (2010); Helms L., The politics of leadership capital in compound democracies: Inferences from the German case, European Political Science Review, 8, pp. 285-310, (2015); Helms L., Introduction: Leadership Questions in Transnational European Governance, European Political Science, 16, pp. 1-13, (2017); Idowu S.A., Abolade D.A., Influence of effective communication and compensation management on employees’ engagement in some selected financial institutions in Lagos State, Nigeria, The International Journal of Business & Management, 6, pp. 1-11, (2018); Jamal J., Bakar H.A., The Mediating Role of Charismatic Leadership Communication in a Crisis: A Malaysian Example, International Journal of Business Communication, 54, pp. 369-393, (2017); Jimenez-Marin G., Zambrano R.E., Galiano-Coronil A., Ravina-Ripoll R., Business and Energy Efficiency in the Age of Industry 4.0: The Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk Sensory Marketing Model Applied to Spanish Textile Stores during the COVID-19 Crisis, Energies, 14, (2021); Kalshoven K., Taylor S., Leadership: Philosophical perspectives and qualitative analysis of Ethics-Looking back, looking forward, looking around, Journal of Business Ethics, 148, pp. 1-3, (2018); Kane J., Patapan H., The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, and Limits Its Leaders, (2012); Kane J., Patapan H., Hart P., Dispersed Democratic Leadership: Origins, Dynamics, and Implications, (2009); Kellerman B., Followership: How Followers are Changing Leaders and Creating Change, (2008); Kerrissey M.J., Satterstrom P., Edmondson A.C., Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms, Organizational Psychology Review, 10, pp. 62-86, (2020); Kilduff G.J., Galinsky A.D., Gallo E., Reade J., Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 59, pp. 1508-1534, (2016); Kim S., Tam L., Bach S., Understanding the effects of perceived ethics failure, compassionate leadership, and communication strategy on anti-government sentiment, Journal of Public Affairs, 18, (2018); Lavrakas P.J., Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, (2008); Li A.N., Hui L., Tangirala S., Firth B.M., The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains, Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, pp. 1259-1270, (2017); Lindebaum D., Geddes D., Gabriel Y., Moral Emotions and Ethics in Organisations: Introduction to the Special Issue, Journal of Business Ethics, 141, pp. 645-656, (2017); Lips-Wiersma M., Haar J., Wright S., The effect of fairness, responsible leadership and worthy work on multiple dimensions of meaningful work, Journal of Business Ethics, 161, pp. 35-52, (2020); Lopez-Aguado M., Gutierrez-Provecho L., Checking the underlying structure of R-SPQ-2F using covariance structure analysis/Comprobación de la estructurasubyacente del R-SPQ-2F medianteanálisis de estructura de covarianza, Culture and Education, 30, pp. 105-141, (2018); Luanglath N., Ali M., Mohannak K., Top management team gender diversity and productivity: The role of board gender diversity, Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, 38, pp. 71-86, (2019); Luhmann N., Die Moral der Gesellschaft, (2008); Luque A., Analysis of the Ethical (and Aesthetic) Framework and Its Relation to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of the Textile Industry, Management and Inter/Intra Organizational Relationships in the Textile and Apparel Industry, pp. 325-347, (2020); Luque A., Decent Work and the Processes of Informality: The Case of the Wholesale Market of Ambato, Ecuador, Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 70-89, (2021); Luque Gonzalez A., Martin J.A.C., Vaca-Tapia A.C., Rivas F., How Sustainability Is Defined: An Analysis of 100 Theoretical Approximations, Mathematics, 9, (2021); Luque Gonzalez A., Gutierrez F.C., Public Strategy and Eco-Social Engagement in Latin American States: An Analysis of Complex Networks Arising from Their Constitutions, Sustainability, 12, (2020); Luque Gonzalez A., de Pablos Heredero C., Factors that promote the lack of ethics in the production and logistics practices of transnational companies, Lan Harremanak, 34, pp. 336-370, (2016); Lyubovnikova J., West T.H.R., Dawson J.F., West M.A., Examining the Indirect Effects of Perceived Organizational Support for Teamwork Training on Acute Health Care Team Productivity and Innovation: The Role of Shared Objectives, Group & Organization Management, 43, pp. 382-413, (2018); Maggeni A., Affective Leadership Practices: A Framework for Studying Affect and Leadership from a Schatzkian Practice Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, (2021); Marquardt D.J., Casper W.J., Kuenzi M., Leader Goal Orientation and Ethical Leadership: A Socio-Cognitive Approach of the Impact of Leader Goal-Oriented Behavior on Employee Unethical Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-17, (2021); Meiers F.-J., The stress test of German leadership, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 57, pp. 47-55, (2015); Mejia Gomez L.F., Psicología y Ruralidad, (2017); Meral Y., Strategie Management to Prevent Money Laundering: The Role of Effective Communication, Journal of Accounting & Finance, 20, pp. 32-48, (2020); Mercader V., Study of the Ethical Values of College Students, Ph.D. dissertation, (2006); Mercader V., Relationship of Productivity, Ethics, Decision Making and Happiness, International Journal of Management and Finance, 10, pp. 87-104, (2017); Mercader V., Educación inspiradora: Conocimiento solucionador y aplicable con felicida, Journal of Management and Business Education, 2, pp. 160-188, (2019); Mercader V., Ethics and Leadership from the Perspective of University Students and Professionals, Journal of Management and Business Education, 3, pp. 266-296, (2020); Mihelic K.K., Lipicnik B., Tekavcic M., Ethical leadership, International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 14, pp. 31-41, (2010); Mo S., Ling C.-D., Xie X.-Y., The curvilinear relationship between ethical leadership and team creativity: The moderating role of team faultlines, Journal of Business Ethics, 154, pp. 229-242, (2019); Moreno W., Mercader V., Impact of the Application of Ethical Values in the Dimensions of Entrepreneurship and Change/Innovation, Progress in Ethical Practices of Businesses, pp. 241-263, (2021); Muller H., Van Esch F.A.W.J., The contested nature of political leadership in the European Union: Conceptual and methodological cross-fertilisation, West European Politics, 43, pp. 1051-1071, (2019); Munro I., Thanem T., The ethics of affective leadership: Organising good encounters without leaders, Business Ethics Quarterly, 28, pp. 51-69, (2017); Murnieks C.Y., Cardon M.S., Sudek R., White D., Brooks W.T., Drawn to the fire: The role of passion, tenacity and inspirational leadership in angel investing, Journal of Business Venturing, 31, pp. 468-484, (2016); Nassif A.G., Hackett R.D., Wang G., Ethical, Virtuous, and Charismatic Leadership: An Examination of Differential Relationships with Follower and Leader Outcomes, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-23, (2020); (2015); Nicha Andrade J., The Role of Civil Society in Implementing the SDGs Locally: The Case of Curitiba, Its Challenges, and Practices, Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 369-388, (2021); Nicha Andrade J., Constructing and Reconstructing Orientalism: Depicting Orientalist Imagery in Contemporary Art in the Quest of Self-Identity, Handbook of Research on Contemporary Approaches to Orientalism in Media and Beyond, pp. 92-106, (2021); Nicha Andrade J., Reinventing operating models for sustainable organizational performance: The case of The Big Search. Approved and accepted for publication on the 23rd of September 2021, Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era, (2022); Nicholson J., Kurucz E., Relational leadership for sustainability: Building an ethical framework from the moral theory of ‘ethics of care, Journal of Business Ethics, 156, pp. 25-43, (2019); Nielsen R.P., Lockwood C., Varieties of Transformational Solutions to Institutional 2015) Ethics Logic Conflicts, Journal of Business Ethics, 149, pp. 45-55, (2018); Nye J.S., Power and Leadership, Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice, (2010); Palova Z., Sebestova J., Competencies, Skills, and Goals Needed for Social Enterprises: Case of the Czech Republic, Developing Entrepreneurial Competencies for Start-Ups and Small Business, pp. 109-128, (2020); Parker D.W., Holesgrove M., Pathak R., Improving productivity with self-organised teams and agile leadership, International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 64, pp. 112-128, (2015); Parsons T., The Social System, (1951); Pauly J.J., Hutchison L.L., Moral fables of public relations practice: The Tylenol and Exxon Valdez cases, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20, pp. 231-249, (2005); Pio R.J., Tampi J.R.E., The influence of spiritual leadership on quality of work life, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior, International Journal of Law and Management, 60, pp. 757-767, (2018); Pizarro K., Martinez O., Análisis factorial exploratorio mediante el uso de las medidas de adecuación muestral kmo y esfericidad de barlett para determinar factores principales, Journal of Science and Research, 5, pp. 903-924, (2020); Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp. 879-903, (2003); Popescu C.R.G., Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Business Performance: Limits and Challenges Imposed by the Implementation of Directive 2013/34/EU in Romania, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Popescu C.R.G., Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital?, Sustainability, 12, (2020); Popescu C.R.G., Analyzing the Impact of Green Marketing Strategies on the Financial and Non-Financial Performance of Organizations: The Intellectual Capital Factor, Green Marketing as a Positive Driver Toward Business Sustainability, pp. 186-218, (2020); Popescu C.R.G., Developing a Model for Entrepreneurship Competencies: Innovation, Knowledge Management, and Intellectual Capital—Success Competences for Building Inclusive Entrepreneurship and Organizational Performance, Developing Entrepreneurial Competencies for Start-Ups and Small Business, pp. 1-22, (2020); Popescu C.R.G., Approaches to Sustainable and Responsible Entrepreneurship: Creativity, Innovation, and Intellectual Capital as Drivers for Organization Performance, Building an Entrepreneurial and Sustainable Society, pp. 75-95, (2020); Popescu C.R.G., Impact of Innovative Capital on the Global Performance of the European Union: Implications on Sustainability Assessment, Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 90-124, (2021); Popescu C.R.G., Sustainable and Responsible Entrepreneurship for Value-Based Cultures, Economies, and Societies: Increasing Performance through Intellectual Capital in Challenging Times, Sustainable and Responsible Entrepreneurship and Key Drivers of Performance, pp. 33-58, (2021); Popescu C.R.G., Measuring Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Creativity, Intellectual Capital, and Innovation, Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, pp. 125-136, (2021); Popescu C.R.G., Fostering Creativity in Business: Empowering Strong Transformational Leaders. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 10th of August 2021), Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance by Avoiding Management Bias and Tax Minimization: Reaching a General Consensus Regarding a Minimum Global Tax Rate. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 06th of September 2021), COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on New Economy Development and Societal Change, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Mindfulness Business Principles: Producing Outstanding Value and Encouraging Community Connections. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 23rd of September 2021), COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on New Economy Development and Societal Change, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Mindfulness at Work, a Sound Business Investment: Focusing on the Employees’ Well-being, while Increasing Creativity and Innovation. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 12th of October 2021), Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Banta V.C., Performance Evaluation of the Implementation of the 2013/34/EU Directive in Romania on the Basis of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Popescu C.R.G., Duhacek-Sebestova J., Fiscally Responsible Businesses as a Result of Covid-19 Pandemic Shock: Taking Control of Countries’ Tax Systems by Putting an End to Corporate Tax Evasion and Tax Havens. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 28th of August 2021), Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Kyriakopoulos G.L., Strategic Human Resource Management in the 21st-Century Organizational Landscape: Human and Intellectual Capital as Drivers for Performance Management. (Approved and accepted for publication on the 22nd of August 2021), COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on New Economy Development and Societal Change, (2022); Popescu C.R.G., Popescu G.N., An Exploratory Study Based on a Questionnaire Concerning Green and Sustainable Finance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Performance: Evidence from the Romanian Business Environment, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12, (2019); Popescu C.R.G., Popescu G.N., The Social, Economic, and Environmental Impact of Ecological Beekeeping in Romania, Agrifood Economics and Sustainable Development in Contemporary Society, pp. 75-96, (2019); Raelin J.A., Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency, Leadership, 12, pp. 1-28, (2014); Rahman N.F.A., Adeleke A.Q., The Relationship between Effective Communication and Construction Risk Management among Kuantan Malaysian Construction Industries, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 10, pp. 18-24, (2018); Rashid M.H.U., Zobair S.A.M., Chowdhury M.A.I., Islam A., Corporate governance and banks’ productivity: Evidence from the banking industry in Bangladesh, Business Research, 13, pp. 615-637, (2020); Rathbun B.C., Rathbun Trust in International Cooperation, (2012); Ravina-Ripoll R., Foncubierta-Rodriguez M.-J., Ahumada-Tello E., Tobar-Pesantez L.B., Does Entrepreneurship Make You Happier? A Comparative Analysis between Entrepreneurs and Wage Earners, Sustainability, 13, (2021); Rego A., Cunha M.P., Simpson A.V., The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: An empirical study, Journal of Business Ethics, 148, pp. 205-218, (2018); Rousseau V., Aube C., When leaders stifle innovation in work teams: The role of abusive supervision, Journal of Business Ethics, 151, pp. 651-664, (2018); Sailer K., Koutsolampros P., Pachilova R., Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout, PLoS ONE, 16, (2021); Salas-Vallina A., Simone C., Fernandez-Guerrero R., The human side of leadership: Inspirational leadership effects on follower characteristics and happiness at work (HAW), Journal of Business Research, 107, pp. 162-171, (2020); Sanchez-Figuera R., Gutierrez F.C., Gonzalez A.L., Garcia-Guerrero J., Sensationalism vs. Information During COVID-19 in Ecuador: A Framing Theory-Based View, Impact of Infodemic on Organizational Performance, pp. 195-216, (2021); Sarabia P.L., Efectos financieros del gobierno corporativo y ética en los negocios en México: El caso de Cemex y TV-Azteca, Revista Ibero Americana de Estrategia, 5, pp. 117-126, (2006); Schuh S.C., Zheng M.X., Xin K.R., Fernandez J.A., The interpersonal benefits of leader mindfulness: A serial mediation model linking leader mindfulness, leader procedural justice enactment, and employee exhaustion and performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 156, pp. 1007-1025, (2019); Schweikl S., Obermaier R., Lessons from three decades of IT productivity research: Towards a better understanding of IT-induced productivity effects, Management Review Quarterly, 70, pp. 461-507, (2020); Sebestova J., Lejkova M., Business Competencies Within Unstable Business Environments, Developing Entrepreneurial Competencies for Start-Ups and Small Business, pp. 41-58, (2020); Sebestova J., Palova Z., Support of Social Innovations: Case of the Czech Republic, Public Sector Entrepreneurship and the Integration of Innovative Business Models, pp. 165-187, (2017); Seele P., What makes a business ethicist? A reflection on the transition from applied philosophy to critical thinking, Journal of Business Ethics, 150, pp. 647-656, (2018); Semedo A.S., Coelho A., Ribeiro N., Authentic leadership, happiness at work and affective commitment: An empirical study in Cape Verde, European Business Review, 31, pp. 337-351, (2019); Sharma A., Agrawal R., Khandelwal U., Developing ethical leadership for business organizations: A conceptual model of its antecedents and consequences, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40, pp. 712-734, (2019); Shrestha N., Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis, American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9, pp. 4-11, (2021); Sison A.J.G., Ferrero I., Guitian G., Characterizing virtues in finance, Journal of Business Ethics, 155, pp. 995-1007, (2019); Smith G., Minor M., Brashen H., Spiritual Leadership: A Guide to a Leadership Style That Embraces Multiple Perspectives, Journal of Instructional Research, 7, pp. 80-89, (2018); Snellman L., Ethics Management: How to achieve Ethical Organizations and Management?, Business, Management and Education, 13, pp. 336-357, (2015); Sood P., Bhushan P., A structured review and theme analysis of financial frauds in the banking industry, Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 9, pp. 305-321, (2020); Straker K., Peel S., Nusem E., Wrigley C., Designing a dangerous unicorn: Lessons from the Theranos case, Business Horizons, 64, pp. 525-536, (2021); Su H.-Y., Business Ethics and the Development of Intellectual Capital, Journal of Business Ethics, 119, pp. 87-98, (2014); Tammany J.E., O'Connell J.K., Allen B.S., Brismee J.-M., Are Productivity Goals in Rehabilitation Practice Associated with Unethical Behaviors?, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 1, (2019); Tavoletti E., Stephens R.D., Dong L., The impact of peer evaluation on team effort, productivity, motivation and performance in global virtual teams, Team Performance Management, 25, pp. 334-347, (2019); Torugsa N.A., O'Donohue W., Hecker R., Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 115, pp. 383-402, (2013); Touhidul I.A.S.M., Sorooshian S., Balancing for an Effective Communication in Organizations, Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, pp. 1605-1607, (2019); Tourigny L., Han J., Baba V.V., Pan P., Ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility in China: A multilevel study of their effects on trust and organisational citizenship behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, 158, pp. 427-440, (2019); Tu Y., Lu X., Choi J.N., Guo W., Ethical leadership and team-level creativity: Mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of supervisor support for creativity, Journal of Business Ethics, 159, pp. 551-565, (2019); Ullah I., Hameed R.M., Kayani N.Z., Fazal Y., CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: Examining the mediating role of organizational ethical culture and intellectual capital, Journal of Management & Organization, 1, pp. 1-21, (2019); Valentine S., Godkin L., Fleishman G.M., Kidwell R., Corporate Ethical Values, Group Creativity, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: The Impact of Work Context on Work Response, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, pp. 353-372, (2011); von Bieberstein F., Gehrlein J., Guntner A., Teamwork revisited: Social preferences and knowledge acquisition in the field, Journal of Business Economics, 90, pp. 591-614, (2020)","C.R.G. Popescu; Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, 030018, Romania; email: cristina.popescu@man.ase.ro","","Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)","","","","","","19118074","","","","English","J. Risk. Financ. Manag.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85130939925"
"Fernback J.","Fernback, Jan (57204209691)","57204209691","Academic/digital work: ICTs, knowledge capital, and the question of educational quality","2018","TripleC","16","1","","143","158","15","3","10.31269/triplec.v16i1.878","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121147575&doi=10.31269%2ftriplec.v16i1.878&partnerID=40&md5=05961ddc07007d7305d80ded2df27532","Temple University, Philadelphia, United States","Fernback J., Temple University, Philadelphia, United States","The ideology of the information society has transformed the performance of academic duties within higher education through the permeation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) into all aspects of the university. These technologies provide a common ground upon which teaching, research, and administration fuse; but how have such arrangements affected the quality of academic work? This ideology functions through values, hierarchies, rewards and punishments, and surveillance that influence routine work. Using a critical orientation, this paper examines the transformation of the quality of the intellectual products and work processes of higher education in a North American context. It examines how the educational technology industry fosters a type of control over academic workers, inhibiting the individual labourer's pursuit of educational quality. Grounded in Foucault’s concept of “disciplinary power” and in Freire’s notions of critical consciousness, it suggests a community-centred approach toward building knowledge capital in higher education. © 2018, Unified Theory of Information Research Group. All righte reserved.","Academic Work; Higher Education; ICTs","","","","","","","","Bowles Samuel, Gintis Herbert, Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life, (2011); Braverman Harry, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, (1974); Cantor Nancy, Courant Paul N., Scrounging for Resources: Reflections on the Whys and Wherefores of Higher Education Finance, New Directions for Institutional Research, 119, pp. 3-12, (2003); Cheng Ming, Quality in Higher Education, (2016); Conceicao Simone C.O., Lehman Rosemary M., Faculty Strategies for Balancing Workload When Teaching Online, the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, & Community Education, (2010); Foucault Michel, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974-1975, (2003); Foucault Michel, The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, pp. 281-301, (1997); Foucault Michel, Power/Knowledge, (1980); Foucault Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, (1977); Foucault Michel, Orders of Discourse, Social Science Information, 10, 2, pp. 7-30, (1971); Freire Paulo, Education for Critical Consciousness, (2005); Freire Paulo, The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation, (1985); Garnham Nicholas, Information Society’ as Theory or Ideology: A Critical Perspective on Technology, Education and Employment in the Information Age, Digital Academe: The New Media and Institutions of Higher Education and Learning, pp. 253-267, (2002); Ginsberg Benjamin, The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters, (2011); Glen Marie, The Future of Higher Education: How Technology Will Shape Learning, (2008); Gruner Sol M., Easley David, Giese Eric, Healey Tim, Lin Hening, Lenetsky Michael, McEuen Paul, Report of the College of Arts and Sciences Committee on Streamlining Research Administration, (2015); Hall Richard, On the Abolition of Academic Labour: The Relationship between Intellectual Workers and Mass Intellectuality, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12, 2, pp. 822-837, (2014); Hall Richard, Educational Technology and the Enclosure of Academic Labour inside Public Higher Education, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11, 3, pp. 52-82, (2013); Hamilton Edward C., Technology and the Politics of University Reform: The Social Shaping of Online Education, (2016); Hanley Larry, Educational Technology and Academic Labor, The Radical Teacher, 63, pp. 25-28, (2002); Jarvis Peter, Universities and Corporate Universities: The Higher Learning Industry in Global Society, (2001); Massy William F., Zemsky Robert, Using Information Technology to Enhance Academic Productivity, (1995); McCarthy Cameron, Afterword: The Unmaking of Education in the Age of Globalization, Neoliberalism and Information, Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labor, pp. 301-321, (2011); Noble David, Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education, First Monday, 3, 1, (1998); Peters Michael A., Bulut Ergin, Introduction, Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labor, pp. xxv-xxl, (2011); Robertson Heather-Jane, Toward the Theory of Negativity: Teacher Education and Information and Communication Technology, Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 4, pp. 280-296, (2003); Rubley Julie Nicklin, Big Data Has Arrived: Using Technology to Measure Student Performance, (2016); Strathern Marilyn, Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, (2000); Taylor Frederick Winslow, The Principles of Scientific Management, (1911); Tuchman Gaye, Wannabe U: Inside the Corporate University, (2009); Twigg Carol, Academic Productivity: The Case for Instructional Software, (1996)","","","Unified Theory of Information Research Group","","","","","","1726670X","","","","English","TripleC","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85121147575"
"Secundo G.; Elia G.","Secundo, Giustina (8246738300); Elia, Gianluca (14021091800)","8246738300; 14021091800","A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: A case study","2014","Measuring Business Excellence","18","3","","23","37","14","37","10.1108/MBE-11-2013-0061","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84927650376&doi=10.1108%2fMBE-11-2013-0061&partnerID=40&md5=bba0daf77b2a16f0ef479c5360957a87","Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy","Secundo G., Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy; Elia G., Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy","Purpose – This paper aims at proposing a performance measurement system (PMS) for academic entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach – The PMS has been developed through action research carried out within an Italian higher education and research centre on the basis of the literature background, focus groups and interviews. Findings – The study presents a new PMS based on an input– output model for academic entrepreneurship. As a result, a multidimensional framework for measuring technology entrepreneurship is proposed together with a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) to assess the “third mission” of universities. The application of the framework allows demonstration of its validity in public settings. Research limitations/implications – Because the research was conducted in a specific organisation, the possibility of generalizing the results to similar institutions is a key issue. Hence, it is important to distinguish between what is general in scope and what is case-specific. Practical implications – This study contributes to the extant literature on performance measurement of entrepreneurship process within research and higher education institutes that is traditionally focussed at the firm level. From a practitioner perspective, the model can be used both by universities which are interested in measuring their entrepreneurial capital and by other stakeholders who are interested in evaluating the value generation performances of universities. Implications for the society are clarified as well. Social implications – As for the society, the proposed model allows evaluation of the university’s pivotal role in the social and economic development of the region where it is located, especially in terms of new employments and new technology-intensive firms. Originality/value – The PMS is developed according to a process-oriented perspective of the academic entrepreneurship by identifying, for each step, a set of KPIs to meet the information needs of different stakeholders. The proposed PMS allows monitoring each phase of the technology entrepreneurship and managing the results in terms of social and economic impact developed. Contributions in PMS and intellectual capital literature are identified. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.","Academic entrepreneurship; Action research; Entrepreneurial university; Intellectual capital; Performance measurement","","","","","","","","Agostino D., Arena M., Azzone G., Dal Molin M., Masella C., Developing a performance measurement system for public research centres, International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 7, 1, pp. 43-60, (2012); Aguinis H., Performance Management, (2009); Arena M., Arnaboldi M., How dealing with spending reviews? The case of Italy, Public Money and Management, 33, 1, pp. 4-6, (2013); Arena M., Arnaboldi M., Azzone G., Carlucci P., Developing a performance measurement system for university central administrative services, Higher Education Quarterly, 63, 3, pp. 237-263, (2009); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An explanatory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bourne M., Neely A., Mills J., Platts K., Implementing performance measurement systems: A literature review, International Journal Business Performance Management, 5, 1, pp. 1-24, (2003); Broadbent J., Laughlin R., Performance management systems: A conceptual model, Management Accounting Research, 20, 4, pp. 283-295, (2009); Cantaragaiu R., Towards a conceptual delimitation of academic entrepreneurship, Management and Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7, 4, pp. 683-700, (2012); Cavalluzzo K.S., Ittner C.D., Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 3-4, pp. 243-267, (2004); Clark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organisational Pathways of Transformation, (1998); Clark B.R., Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts, (2004); Coccia M., New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes, R&D Management, 34, 3, pp. 267-280, (2004); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); De Bruijn H., Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 7, pp. 578-594, (2002); Di Gregorio D., Shane S., Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, 32, 2, pp. 209-227, (2003); Dolence M.G., Norris D.M., Using key performance indicators to drive strategic decision making, ASHE Reader on Planning and Institutional Research, ASHE Reader Series, pp. 526-538, (1999); European Commission - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, A guiding framework for entrepreneurial universities, (2012); Esposito V., De Nito E., Iacono M.P., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities. The role of performance management systems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 431-450, (2013); Etzkowitz H., Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, Minerva, 21, 2, pp. 198-233, (1983); Etzkowitz H., The evolution of the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 1, pp. 64-77, (2004); PAXIS project-indicators of academic entrepreneurship: Monitoring determinants, start-up activity and wealth creation, (2005); EU-European Union, RICARDIS: Reporting intellectual capital to augment research, development and innovation in SMEs, (2006); Fairweather J.S., The university role in economic development - lessons for academic leaders, Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 22, 3, pp. 5-11, (1990); Fried A., Orellana F., Lighting up ‘blind spots’ while measuring knowledge capital, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 1, pp. 31-38, (2006); Gibb A., Haskins G., Robertson I., Leading the entrepreneurial university, (2009); Gibb A., Haskins G., Robertson I., Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions, Universities in Change: Managing Higher Education Institutions in the Age of Globalization, pp. 9-45, (2013); Goel R.K., Grimpe C., Are all academic entrepreneurs created alike? Evidence from Germany, 4th Annual Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, (2011); Goh S.C., Making performance measurement systems more effective in public sector organizations, Measuring Business Excellence, 16, 1, pp. 31-42, (2012); Jaffe A., The real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, 79, 5, pp. 957-970, (1989); Johanson U., Martensson M., Skoog M., Measuring to understand intangible performance drivers, European Accounting Review, 10, 3, pp. 407-437, (2001); Kirby D., Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory in practice, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5, pp. 599-603, (2006); Klofsten M., Jones-Evans D., Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe - the case of Sweden and Ireland, Small Business Economics, 14, 4, pp. 299-309, (2000); Kong E., Prior D., An intellectual capital perspective of competitive advantage in nonprofit organisations, International Journal Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13, 2, pp. 119-128, (2008); Lazzeroni M., Piccaluga A., Towards the entrepreneurial university, Local Economy, 18, 1, pp. 38-48, (2003); Leitner K.H., Managing and reporting intangible assets in research technology organisations, R&D management, 35, 2, pp. 125-136, (2005); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organization: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Martin B.R., Etzkowitz H., The origin and evolution of the university species, Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 13, 3-4, pp. 9-34, (2001); Mouritsen J., Thorbjornsen S., Bukh P.N., Johansen M.R., Intellectual capital and new public management, The Learning Organisation, 11, 4-5, pp. 380-392, (2004); Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A., The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980, Research Policy, 30, 1, pp. 99-119, (2001); Nadim A., Hoffman A., A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship, (2008); Neely A.D., Gregory M.J., Platts K.W., Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 4, pp. 80-116, (1995); Oakey R.P., High Technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, (1995); Measuring Entrepreneurship - A Collection of Indicators, (2009); Methodological Guide, (2006); Philbin S., Measuring the performance of research collaborations, Measuring Business Excellence, 12, 3, pp. 16-23, (2008); Poh-Kam W., Yuen-Ping H., Singh A., Towards an entrepreneurial university, model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the national university of Singapore, World Development, 35, 6, pp. 941-958, (2007); Ramirez Y., Intellectual capital models in Spanish public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 248-264, (2010); Rasmussen E., Borch O.J., University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities, Research policy, 39, 5, pp. 602-612, (2010); Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R., American universities and technical advance in industry, Research Policy, 23, 3, pp. 323-348, (1994); Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L., University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 4, pp. 691-791, (2007); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Seemann P., DeLong D., Stucky S., Guthrie E., Building intangible assets: A strategic framework for investing in intellectual capital, Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, (2000); Senker J., Changing organization of public research in Europe: Implications for benchmarking human resources in RTD, Paper prepared for Human Resources in RTD session of the contribution of European socio-economic research to the benchmarking of RTD policies in Europe, Brussels, (2001); Shane S., Encouraging university entrepreneurship: The effect of the Bayh-Dole act on university patenting in the United States, Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 1, pp. 127-151, (2004); Susman G.I., Evered R.D., An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 4, pp. 582-603, (1978); Taylor B.E., Massy W.F., Strategic Indicators for Higher Education, (1996); Trist E.L., A concept of organizational ecology, The Australian Journal of Management, 2, 2, pp. 171-175, (1977); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, pp. 175-192, (2012); Wright M., Birley S., Mosey S., Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 3-4, pp. 235-246, (2004); Wright M., Clarysse B., Mustar P., Lockett A., Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe, (2007)","G. Secundo; Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy; email: giusy.secundo@unisalento.it","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","13683047","","","","English","Measuring Bus. Excellence","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84927650376"
"Secundo G.; Elena Perez S.; Martinaitis Ž.; Leitner K.H.","Secundo, Giustina (8246738300); Elena Perez, Susana (37065891200); Martinaitis, Žilvinas (24725205200); Leitner, Karl Heinz (9735872300)","8246738300; 37065891200; 24725205200; 9735872300","An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities","2017","Technological Forecasting and Social Change","123","","","229","239","10","141","10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009807599&doi=10.1016%2fj.techfore.2016.12.013&partnerID=40&md5=db19b3ccc0964283e9202da1c0d0672a","Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, via per Monteroni, s.n., Lecce, 73100, Italy; European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville, 41092, Spain; Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Business Management Department, Campus Palmas Altas, Sevilla, Spain; Visionary Analytics, M. Valančiaus st. 1A, Vilnius, LT-03155, Lithuania; Austrian Institute of Technology, Innovation Systems Department, Donau-City-Straße 1, Vienna, 1220, Austria; Center for Entrepreneurship and Applied Business Studies, University of Graz, Elisabethstraße 50b/II, Graz, 8010, Austria","Secundo G., Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, via per Monteroni, s.n., Lecce, 73100, Italy; Elena Perez S., European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Seville, 41092, Spain, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Business Management Department, Campus Palmas Altas, Sevilla, Spain; Martinaitis Ž., Visionary Analytics, M. Valančiaus st. 1A, Vilnius, LT-03155, Lithuania; Leitner K.H., Austrian Institute of Technology, Innovation Systems Department, Donau-City-Straße 1, Vienna, 1220, Austria, Center for Entrepreneurship and Applied Business Studies, University of Graz, Elisabethstraße 50b/II, Graz, 8010, Austria","Third mission activities of universities are related to the generation, use, application and exploitation of knowledge with external stakeholders and society in general. Third mission cannot be considered as a residual function but complementary to the other two missions of universities: teaching and research. Performance criteria for measuring the third mission stream of universities have now become crucial. The call for performance measures is also driven by the European policy framework such as the definition of Smart Specialisation strategies (RIS3) which highlight the key the role of universities in regional development. In an attempt to cover this gap, the paper proposes a new conceptual framework based on Intellectual Capital approaches to measure third mission activities of universities. The framework establishes a generic approach for systematically analysing third stream activities in universities. Moving from the third mission goals, it focuses on three interrelated areas: research, i.e. technology transfer and innovation, teaching, i.e. lifelong learning and continuing education, as well as, social engagement in line with regional and national development. A first exploration of the framework in four European universities approaching third mission performance is provided to discuss implementation opportunities. Finally, theoretical and empirical implications are discussed indicating avenues for moving ahead academic research. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.","Indicators; Intellectual Capital; Performance measurement; Third mission; University","Europe; Indicators (instruments); Information management; Knowledge management; Regional planning; Societies and institutions; Technology transfer; Conceptual frameworks; European universities; External stakeholders; Intellectual capital; Performance measurements; Teaching and researches; Third mission; University; academic research; exploitation; intellectual property rights; performance assessment; regional development; regional policy; research work; stakeholder; strategic approach; teaching; technology adoption; university sector; Education","","","","","","","Agostino D., Arena M., Azzone G., Dal Molin M., Masella C., Developing a performance measurement system for public research centres, Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Manag., 7, 1, pp. 43-60, (2012); Arena M., Arnaboldi M., Azzone G., Carlucci P., Developing a performance measurement system for University Central administrative services, High. Educ. Q., 63, 3, pp. 237-263, (2009); Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development, J. Technol. Transfer., 31, (2006); Boedker C., Mouritsen J., Guthrie J., Enhanced business reporting: international trends and possible policy directions, J. Hum. Resour. Cost. Account., 12, 1, pp. 14-25, (2008); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an explanatory study that develops measures and models, Manag. Decis., 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Borin E., Donato F., Unlocking the potential of IC in Italian cultural ecosystems, J. Intellect. Cap., 16, 2, (2015); Bowland T., Fowler A., A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisations, Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., 13, 5, pp. 417-446, (2000); Broadbent J., Laughlin R., Performance management systems: a conceptual model, Manag. Account. Res., 20, 4, pp. 283-295, (2009); Castellanos A.R., Rodriguez A., University R&D&T capital: what types of knowledge drive it?, J. Intellect. Cap., 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Chiucchi M.S., Dumay J., Unlocking intellectual capital, J. Intellect. Cap., 16, 2, (2015); Clark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways to Transformation, (1998); Coccia M., New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes, R&D Manag., 34, 3, pp. 267-280, (2004); Cuganesan S., Intellectual capital-in-action and value creation: a case study of knowledge transformations in an innovation project, J. Intellect. Cap., 6, 3, pp. 357-373, (2005); Cuganesan S., Boedker C., Guthrie J., Enrolling discourse consumers to affect material intellectual capital practice, Account. Audit. Account. J., 20, 6, pp. 883-911, (2007); Di Gregorio D., Shane S., Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Res. Policy, 32, pp. 209-227, (2003); Dolence M.G., Norris D.M., Using key performance indicators to drive strategic decision making, ASHE Reader on Planning and Institutional Research, ASHE Reader Series, pp. 526-538, (1999); Dumay J., 15 years of the Journal of Intellectual Capital and counting: a manifesto for transformational IC research, J. Intellect. Cap., 15, 1, pp. 2-37, (2014); Dumay J., Cuganesan S., Making sense of intellectual capital complexity: measuring through narrative, J. Hum. Resour. Cost. Account., 15, 1, (2011); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital and strategy as practice: a critical examination, Int. J. Knowl. Syst. Sci., 4, 3, pp. 28-37, (2012); Dumay J.C., Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach, J. Intellect. Cap., 10, 2, (2009); E3M, Needs and constraints analysis of the three dimensions of third mission activities, E3M: European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission, (2010); E3M Project, Green paper: fostering and measuring “third mission” in higher education institutions, (2012); Ebrahim A., Kasturi Rangan V., What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance, Calif. Manag. Rev., 56, 3, pp. 118-141, (2014); Edvinsson L., IC 21: reflections from 21 years of IC practice and theory, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 1, pp. 163-172, (2013); Elena S., Governing the University of the 21st century: Intellectual Capital as a Tool for Strategic Management, (2007); Elena-Perez S., Leitner K.H., Secundo G., Martinaitis Z., Shaping new managerial models in European universities: the impact of reporting and managing IC, Intellectual Capital in Organizations: Non-financial Reports and Accounts, pp. 150-165, (2014); Esposito V., De Nito E., Iacono M.P., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities. The role of performance management systems, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 3, pp. 431-450, (2013); Etzkowitz H., The entrepreneurial university: vision and metrics, Ind. High. Educ., 30, 2, pp. 83-97, (2016); Etzkowitz H., Klofsten L., The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development, R&D Manag., 35, (2005); Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Cantisano Terra B.R., The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution from ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Res. Policy, 29, pp. 313-330, (2000); European Commission, University-regional partnerships: case studies. Mobilising universities for smart specialisation, European Commission, JRC-IPTS, Smart Specialisation Platform. June 2014, (2014); European Commission, Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy, (2005); The contribution of universities to innovation, (regional) growth and employment, EENEE Analytical Report No. 18 Prepared for the European Commission, (2014); Feldman M.P., Entrepreneurship and American research universities: evolution in technology transfer, The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the U.S. Knowledge Economy, pp. 92-112, (2003); Fried A., Orellana F., Lighting up ‘blind spots’ while measuring knowledge capital, Electron. J. Knowl. Manag., 4, 1, pp. 31-38, (2006); Gibb A.A., Hannon P., Towards the entrepreneurial university?, Int. J. Entrep. Educ., 4, pp. 73-110, (2006); Gorason B., Maharajh R., Schmoch U., New activities of universities in transfer and extension: multiple requirements and manifold solutions, Sci. Public Policy, 36, 2, pp. 157-164, (2009); Grimaldi M., Cricelli L., Rogo F., A theoretical framework for assessing managing and indexing the intellectual capital, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 4, pp. 501-521, (2013); Guan J., Zhao Q., The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 80, pp. 1271-1286, (2013); Guthrie J., Petty R., Ricceri F., The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia, J. Intellect. Cap., 7, 2, pp. 254-271, (2006); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, Br. Account. Rev., 44, 2, pp. 68-92, (2012); Habersam M., Piber M., Exploring intellectual capital in hospitals: two qualitative case studies in Italy and Austria, Eur. Account. Rev., 12, 4, pp. 753-779, (2003); Hsu D.W.L., Shen Y.C., Yuan B.J.C., Chou C.Y., Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 92, pp. 25-39, (2015); Jensen R., Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C., Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: “the best we can do with the s**t we get to work with”, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 21, pp. 1271-1300, (2003); Jongbloed B., Enders J., Salerno C., Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda, High. Educ., 56, pp. 303-324, (2008); Lambert R., Lambert Review of Business-Industry Collaboration, (2003); Laredo P., Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities?, High Educ. Pol., 20, pp. 441-456, (2007); Leitner K.H., Curaj A., Elena-Perez S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.A., Zaksa K., A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in European universities, Guidelines for Implementation, UEFISCDI Blueprint Series, No. 1, Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding, Bucharest, (2014); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organization: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Manag. Account. Res., 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Res. Eval., 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Molas-Gallart J., Defining, measuring and funding the Third Mission: a debate on the future of the university, Coneixement Soc., 7, pp. 6-27, (2005); Molas-Gallart J., Castro-Martinez E., Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ‘Third Mission’ indicators, Res. Eval., 16, 4, pp. 321-330, (2007); Montesinos P., Carot J.M., Martinez J.M., Mora F., Third mission ranking for world class universities: beyond teaching and research, High. Educ. Eur., 33, 2-3, pp. 259-271, (2008); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC, Account. Audit. Account. J., 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Nadim A., Hoffman A., A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship, OECD Statistics Working Papers 2008/2, (2008); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Acad. Manag. Rev., 23, pp. 242-256, (1998); Methodological guide, final report of the Observatory of the European University, PRIME Project, (2006); OECD, Measuring Entrepreneurship - A Collection of Indicators, Eurostat Entrepreneurship Indicators Programme, (2009); Parker L., University corporation: driving redefinition, Crit. Perspect. Account., 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Pidd M., Measuring the Performance of Public Services: Principles and Practice, (2012); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, J. Intellect. Cap., 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, J. Intellect. Cap., 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Rasmussen E., Borch O.J., University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities, Res. Policy, 39, pp. 602-612, (2010); Redford D.T., Fayolle A., Stakeholder management and the entrepreneurial university, Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University, (2014); Romano A., Passiante G., Del Vecchio P., Secundo G., The innovation ecosystem as booster for the innovative entrepreneurship in the smart specialization strategy, Int. J. Knowl. Bas. Dev, 5, 3, pp. 271-288, (2014); Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R., American universities and technical advance in industry, Res. Policy, 23, pp. 323-348, (1994); Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L., University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Ind. Corp. Chang., 16, 4, pp. 691-791, (2007); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, J. Intellect. Cap., 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Secundo G., Elia G., A performance measurement systems for academic entrepreneurship, Meas. Bus. Excell., 18, 3, pp. 23-37, (2014); Secundo G., Duamy J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, J. Intellect. Cap., 17, 2, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM), to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, J. Intellect. Cap., 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, J. Intellect. Cap., 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Passiante G., Gianfreda, Passabi S., Managing intellectual capital in entrepreneurial university: a collective intelligence approach, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Intellectual Capital ECIC 2014, Slovak University of Technology (STU), Trnava, Slovak Republic 10–11 April, (2014); Seemann P., DeLong D., Stucky S., Guthrie E., Building intangible assets: a strategic framework for investing in intellectual capital, Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, (2000); Senker J., Changing organization of public research in Europe, Implications for Benchmarking Human Resources in RTD, Paper Prepared for Human Resources, RTD Session of the Contribution of European Socio-economic Research to the Benchmarking of RTD Policies in Europe, Brussels, March 15–16, (2001); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisations, (1997); Taylor B.E., Massy W.F., Strategic Indicators for Higher Education, (1996); TU Graz, Entwicklungsplan 2015plus, (2015); Universita ca' Foscari Venezia, ‘Verso Università ca’ Foscari 2018 – Piano Strategico 3/2012, Venezia, Italy, (2012); University of Manchester, (2015); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, J. Intellect. Cap., 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., (2012); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Vilniaus Universitetas, Vilniaus universiteto 2013-2015 m. strateginis veiklos planas, Vilnius, (2013); Wright M., Birley S., Mosey S., Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer, J. Technol. Transf., 29, 3-4, pp. 235-246, (2004); Zomer A., Benneworth P., The rise of the university's Third Mission, Reform of Higher Education in Europe, (2011)","G. Secundo; Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, Lecce, via per Monteroni, s.n., 73100, Italy; email: giusy.secundo@unisalento.it","","Elsevier Inc.","","","","","","00401625","","","","English","Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85009807599"
"Ola A.C.","Ola, Adekoya Clement (57214798184)","57214798184","Manpower planning and total quality management as predictors of service delivery in academic library","2019","Library Philosophy and Practice","2019","","2256","","","","1","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066067853&partnerID=40&md5=f04b490b111f866fa076dfe7861b660a","Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria","Ola A.C., Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria","This study investigated manpower planning, total quality management (TQM) and service delivery in academic libraries. Descriptive survey research design was adopted. The population of the study was 83 staff comprising 45 librarians and 38 library officers in the university libraries of the seven universities in Ondo State, Nigeria. Data were collected using questionnaire. Out of eighty three (83) questionnaires distributed, sixty two (62) copies were returned. Data collected were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings of the study revealed that: the needs for manpower planning in academic libraries are: selection and recruitment of qualified personnel, assessment of training and staff development needs, and assessment of future skills requirement; manpower planning techniques employed in academic libraries are: forecasting manpower needs, forecasting manpower supply, balancing manpower supply and demand, short-term forecasting and long-term forecasting; the rationales for TQM practices in academic libraries include encouragement of staff towards top quality performance, commitment to continuous improvement of quality, improved quality service delivery and effective team work; TQM techniques employed in academic libraries include customer-based, employee-based, process-based, management-based, product-based, and supplier-based; the focus of service delivery systems in academic libraries are: promotion of learning, supporting and managing the institution's intellectual capital, and promotion of research; the major challenges militating against effective service delivery in academic libraries are: ineffective manpower planning, insufficient information resources, lack of adherence to TQM practice, technology adaptation, inadequate basic library infrastructure, cost of acquiring library resources, insufficient administrative commitment, inordinate library policies, and lack of information skills by librarians. © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.","Libraries; Library services; Manpower planning; Total quality management","","","","","","","","Adegun A., Oyewumi O., Oladapo Y., Sobalaje A.J., Effectiveness of Library Service and Resources in an African University, Information and Knowledge Management, 5, 3, (2015); Adeoye M.O., Popoola S.O., Teaching effectiveness, availability, accessibility and use of library and information resources among teaching staff of schools of nursing in Osun and Oyo State, Nigeria, Library Philosophy and Practice, (2011); Aguolu C.C., Aguolu I.E., Libraries and information management in Nigeria, (2002); Ajayi N.A., Akinniyi A.R., Accessibility of health information to primary health care workers in some selected local government areas in Nigeria, Owena Journal of library and Information Science, 1, 2, pp. 31-38, (2004); Akpan-Atata E., Akwang N.E., Akai I.M., Eyene E.T., Accomplishing effective service delivery in academic libraries in Nigeria: The imperatives of IR, FOSS, Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter and Skype applications, Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 3, 1, pp. 1-5, (2015); Akporhonor B.A., Library Funding in Nigeria: Past, Present and Future, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 18, 2, pp. 63-70, (2005); Anyanwu E., What are the functions of an academic library?, (2018); Apotiade J.K., National, state and public libraries, (2002); Changing Roles of Academic and Research Libraries, (2007); Human resource development and library, (2018); Cole G.A., Personnel management: Theory and practice (4th ed.), (1997); Digha O.A., Wenibowei M.C.K., Sophia M.J., The need for manpower planning in the public and organized private sectors in Nigeria, International Journal of Labour and Organisational Psychology, 3, 1-2, (2009); Diksha S., Manpower planning: Meaning, factors, objectives and principles; Emezie N.A., Nwaohiri N.M., 21st century librarians and effective information science delivery, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 4, 1, (2013); Farah R.M., Factors influencing quality service delivery in public libraries: A case study of Garissa Provincial Library, (2013); Fowowe S.O., Students' use of an academic library: A survey, Library and Information Science, Review, 7, 1, pp. 47-57, (1989); Greenwood T., Organization and management of public libraries, (1971); Ijiekhuamhen O.P., Blessing A., Omosekejimi A.F., Assess users' satisfaction on academic library performance: A study, International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3, 5, (2015); Jafari S.M., Setak M., Total quality management tools and techniques: The quest for an mplementation roadmap, Proceedings of the AGBA 7th World Congress, (2010); Jubb M., Green R., Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services, (2007); Kanguru A.G., Application of total quality management (TQM) in evaluating the quality of library services at Aga Khan, (2014); Kannappanavar B.U., Kumbargoudar P., Manpower planning in Agricultural Science University Libraries in India, Journal Media and Communication Studies, 2, 3, pp. 062-066, (2010); Krishma C.M., Manpower planning in university libraries, (1993); Kumar K., Library administration and management, (1991); Kumar M., Academic Libraries in electronic environment: Paradigm shift A paper presented at the International Conference on Academic Libraries, (2009); Kumbar R.D., The Importance of Marketing and Total Quality Management in Libraries, Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 5, 2-3, (2004); Nitin M., Abhay D., Total Quality Management in the Academic Library, Proceeding of National seminar on New Dimensions in Library Management, pp. 91-96, (2010); Mamoria C.B., Gankar S.V., Personnel Management Texts and Cases, (2009); McFarland D.E., Management: Foundations and Practices (5th ed.), (1979); Nicholson N.N., Barlett E., Who uses university libraries?, College and Research Libraries, 3, 3, pp. 217-222, (1962); Nitin M., Abhay D., Total quality management in the academic Library, Proceeding of National seminar on New Dimensions in Library Management, (2010); Noe R.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Gerhart B., Wright P.M., Fundamentals of Human Resources Management, (2004); Norliya A.K., Khasiah Z., Users' perceptions on the contributions of UiTM libraries in creating a learning environment, (2006); Oakland J.S., TQM: Text with Cases, (2003); Oakland J.S., Total Quality Management, (1993); Ojo F., Aderinto A., Fashoyin T., Manpower development and utilization in Nigeria: Problems and policies, (1986); Omekwu C.O., Echezona R.I., Emerging Challenges and Opportunities for Nigerian Libraries, (2008); Omodia S.M., Manpower development in Nigeria: Conceptual and methodological perspectives, Journal of Social Science, 18, 2, pp. 113-117, (2009); Othman O., Ghazi A., Al W., Marwan N., Toward integration between total quality management & knowledge management: Evidence from libraries of Jordanian universities, International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), 4, 11, pp. 48-58, (2016); Oyediran-Tidings S., Information needs and seeking behavior of library users: Results from Yaba College of Technology, Lagos, Lagos Journal of Library and Information Science, 2, 2, pp. 77-88, (2004); Parmar D., Makwana P., Approaches and techniques in manpower planning, International Conference on Management, Humanity and Economics (ICMHE'2012), (2012); Ramzan M., Does level of knowledge impact librarians' attitude towards Information Technology (IT) applications?, pp. 11-13, (2004); Salegna G., Fazel F., An integrative approach for selecting a TQM/BPR implementation plan, International Journal of Quality Science, 1, 3, pp. 6-23, (1996); Santhoshkumar M., Murugesapandiyan N., Impact of total quality management in academic libraries, Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science & Humanities, 3, 3, (2016); Sathe V.S., Total quality management in libraries ""Knowledge Librarian, An International Peer Reviewed Bilingual E-Journal of Library and Information Science, 2, 1, (2015); Seckler-Hudson C., Organisation and management: Theory and practice, (1955); Shawal M., Manpower Planning (MP): Meaning, Steps and Techniques | Manpower Planning; Sivadas K.K., Library management, (2012); Sivankalai S., Thulasi K.Y.S., Total Quality Management in Academic Libraries: A Study, International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3, 1, pp. 66-72, (2012); Tiefel V., The gateway to information: A system redefines: How libraries are used, American libraries, 22, 9, (2004); Services provided by the university libraries, (2018); Unomah J.I., Students' utilization of Academic libraries in Nigeria: The example of two universities, Nigerian Library and Information Science Review, 6, 2, pp. 51-57, (1988); Vivek S.S., Total quality management in libraries, Knowledge Librarian, 2, 1, pp. 2394-2479, (2015)","A.C. Ola; Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria; email: Myclem10@gmail.com","","University of Idaho Library","","","","","","15220222","","","","English","Libr. Philos. Pract.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85066067853"
"Di Berardino D.; Corsi C.","Di Berardino, Daniela (36543692100); Corsi, Christian (57190257138)","36543692100; 57190257138","A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities","2018","Journal of Intellectual Capital","19","1","","178","201","23","55","10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0042","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039696779&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-02-2017-0042&partnerID=40&md5=b623060cd370e30cfb71bedfebe7b322","Department of Business Administration and Management, University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy; Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy","Di Berardino D., Department of Business Administration and Management, University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy; Corsi C., Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy","Purpose: Using the quality evaluation approach, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the contribution of intellectual capital (IC) to the development of the third mission in Italian universities, defining the impact of these activities in the regional context. This research aims to verify if the mandatory reporting on quality discloses the contribution of IC to value creation, enhancing the universities’ awareness about IC management and third mission development. Design/methodology/approach: The convergence between IC framework and quality evaluation approach is tested through an empirical research on a sample of 71 Italian universities funded by the government. Statistical analyses use data collected for the period 2004-2014 during the national assessment for research activity and third mission performance. The impact of third mission on the university ecosystem is verified using the indexes related to the territorial development rates. Findings: This research found significant IC disclosure in the quality evaluation model and it highlights the possible integration between the IC measures and the quality evaluation indicators. The research findings show also a positive impact of third mission activities in the university ecosystem and the relevant role of structural capital and relational capital in the development of third mission. These findings encourage a collegial discussion in the university governance and among academics, stimulating a strategic behavior in the whole system Research limitations/implications: The paper focuses the attention on research activity and third mission, considering the final results provided by an external stakeholder of university. Further research must include the role of teaching activity and the opinion of universities’ managers, researchers and administrative staff. Originality/value: Following the neo-institutional sociology perspective, this research analyses for the first time the convergence between the solid experience of quality assessment and the immature IC culture in Italian universities. This analysis explores the value created by intangible activities in the university ecosystem, with a longitudinal perspective, contributing to the fourth stage of the IC literature. © 2018, © Emerald Publishing Limited.","Intellectual capital; Public value; Quality evaluation; Third mission; University","","","","","","","","Abramovsky L., Simpson H., Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: evidence from Great Britain, Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 6, pp. 949-977, (2011); (2013); (2015); (2017); Auricchio M., Cantamessa M., Colombelli A., Cullino R., Orame A., Paolucci E., (2014); Barra C., Zotti R., Investigating the human capital development-growth Nexus. Does the efficiency of universities matter?, International Regional Science Review, 40, 6, pp. 638-678, (2017); Bozeman B., Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, 29, 4-5, pp. 627-655, (2000); Bramwell A., Wolfe D.A., Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo, Research Policy, 37, 8, pp. 1175-1187, (2008); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Carmona S., Ezzamel M., Gutierrez F., Towards an institutional analysis of accounting change in the royal tobacco factory of Seville, Accounting Historians Journal, 25, 1, pp. 115-147, (1998); Cave M., Hanney S., Kogan M., Trevett G., The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice, (1988); Corcoles Y.R., Ponce A.T., Cost-benefit analysis of intellectual capital disclosure: university stakeholders’ view, Revista de Contabilidad, 16, 2, pp. 106-117, (2013); Corcoles Y.R., Santos J.F., Tejada A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Cornforth C., Edwards C., Board Roles in the strategic management of nonprofit organizations: theory and practice, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7, 4, pp. 346-362, (1999); Dambrin C., Lambert C., Sponem S., Control and change – analysing the process of institutionalisation, Management Accounting Research, 18, 2, pp. 172-208, (2007); Del Sordo C., Farneti F., Levy Orelli R., Il controllo multidimensionale della performance di ateneo: la balanced scorecard nella prospettiva internazionale e nel contesto italiano, (2007); DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W., The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 2, pp. 147-160, (1983); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future on intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dumay J., Developing strategy to create a public value chain, Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting, 3, pp. 65-83, (2014); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital and strategy as practice: a critical examination, International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 4, 3, pp. 28-37, (2012); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-287, (2015); Elena-Perez S., Leitner K.H., Coupling with Standardization and Diversity: Intellectual Capital Reporting Guidelines for European Universities, pp. 132-141, (2013); Elena-Perez S., Saritas O., Pook K., Warden C., Ready for the future? Univeristies’ capabilities to strategically manage their intellectual capital, Foresight, 13, 2, pp. 13-48, (2011); Etzkowitz H., Research groups as quasi-firms: the invention of entrepreneurial university, Research Policy, 32, 1, pp. 109-121, (2003); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The future location of research and technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, 2-3, pp. 111-123, (1999); European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission, (2012); Euske N.A., Euske K.J., Institutional theory: employing the other side of rationality in non-profit organizations, British Journal of Management, 2, 1, pp. 81-88, (1991); (2002); Fogarty T.J., The imagery and reality of peer review in the U.S.: insights from institutional theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 2-3, pp. 243-267, (1996); Franzoni C., Opportunity recognition in technology transfer organizations: five case studies from UK and Italy, International Entrepreneur Management Journal, 3, 1, pp. 51-67, (2007); Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C.R., Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1, pp. 58-80, (2002); Guerrero M., Cunningham J.A., Urbano D., Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: an exploratory study of the United Kingdom, Research Policy, 44, 3, pp. 748-764, (2015); Guthrie J., Neumann R., Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities, Public Management Review, 9, 2, pp. 231-252, (2007); Guthrie J., Riccieri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-82, (2012); Harvey L., An assessment of past and current approaches to quality in higher education, Australian Journal of Education, 42, 3, pp. 237-255, (1998); Harvey L., Knight P.T., Transforming Hgher Education, (1996); Henderson R., Jaffe A., Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 1, pp. 119-127, (1998); Hsu D.W., Shen Y.C., Yuan B.J.C., Chou C.Y., Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, pp. 25-39, (2015); (2012); (2015); Jones N., Meadow C., Sicilia M.A., Measuring intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 8, 2, pp. 113-136, (2009); Koslowski F.A., Quality and assessment in context: a brief review, Quality Assurance in Education, 14, 3, pp. 277-288, (2006); Laredo P., Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities?, Higher Education Policy, 20, 4, pp. 441-456, (2007); Leitner K.A., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Leitner K.H., Elena-Perez S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.A., Zaksa K., A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in European universities: guidelines for implementation, (2014); Link A.N., Siegel D.S., Bozeman B., An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 4, pp. 641-655, (2007); Lucianelli G., (2006); Melo A.I., Sarrico C.S., Radnor Z., The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities: the case of an English university, Public Management Review, 12, 2, pp. 233-254, (2010); Decreto autovalutazione, accreditamento iniziale e periodico delle sedi e dei corsi di studio e valutazione periodica, (2013); Modell S., Performance measurement and institutional processes: a study of managerial responses to public sector reform, Management Accounting Research, 12, 4, pp. 437-464, (2001); Molas-Gallart J., Salter A., Patel P., Scott A., Duran X., Measuring third stream activities, (2002); Moore M.H., Creating Public Value Strategic Management in Government, (1995); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K., Performance management system design: a literary review and research agenda, International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 15, 4, pp. 80-116, (1995); (2016); (2005); (2006); Parker L.D., (2007); Piber M., Pietsch G., Performance measurement in universities: the case of knowledge balance sheets analyzed from a new institutionalism perspective, Performance Measurement and Management Control: Improving Organizations and Society Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 16, pp. 379-401, (2006); Rosli A., Rossi F., Third-mission policy goals and incentives from performance-based funding: are they aligned?, Research Evaluation, 25, 4, pp. 427-441, (2016); Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L., University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 4, pp. 691-791, (2007); Sanchez P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez P., Castrillo R., Elena S., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Secundo G., De Beer C., Schutte C.S.L., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: the technology transfer offices’role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Shane S.A., Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, (2004); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Stone M.M., The propensity of governing boards to plan, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1, 3, pp. 203-215, (1991); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Wright M., Clarysse B., Mustar P., Lockett A., Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe, (2007); Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F., Mode 3 and Qradruple Helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 3-4, pp. 201-234, (2009); Carayannis E.G., Barth T.D., Campbell D.F., The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1, pp. 1-2, (2012)","D. Di Berardino; Department of Business Administration and Management, University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy; email: daniela.diberardino@unich.it","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85039696779"
"Del Castillo A.L.Z.","Del Castillo, Ana Luz Zorrilla (57214148187)","57214148187","Intellectual capital in higher education institutions in Mexico; [Capital Intelectual en Instituciones de Educación Superior en México]","2019","Revista Venezolana de Gerencia","24","86","","","","","3","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078335500&partnerID=40&md5=efb17144fdaaa525a1e5291536b57538","Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Mexico","Del Castillo A.L.Z., Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Mexico","The education landscape is one of great challenges, which oblige the Higher Education Institutions to improve the management practices of the different resources that integrate them, with the aim of improving their level of competitiveness, supported by associations and governmental agencies that seek a significant strengthening of their activities. The aim of this study was to analyze the knowledge management in academic environments based on the analysis of the constructs of the theory of intellectual capital, so it is developed from the analysis of trajectories of Intellectual Capital formed by teachers in the Institutions of Higher Education compared to the results of academic competitiveness obtained. In relation of the period analyzed, the management of the intellectual capital of the Higher Education Institutions in Mexico was identified with a positive and significant impact on their academic competitiveness, a significant and positive relationship in the competitiveness of teachers and the competitiveness of the postgraduate program; which provides a perspective for the development of management strategies within the Universities so that through better academic development policies, it will have a more significant impact on academic competitiveness in the country. © 2019, Universidad del Zulia. All rights reserved.","Academic competitiveness; Institutions of Higher; Intellectual capital","Mexico [North America]; academic performance; educational development; higher education; human capital; management practice; teaching","","","","","","","Ballina F., Teoría De La Administración Un Enfoque Alternativo 1ª edición, (2000); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99-120, (1991); Bhatt G., Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interactions between technologies, techniques, and people, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 1, pp. 68-75, (2001); Brooking A., El Capital Intelectual, (1997); Bueno E., Morcillo P., Rodriguez J., Luque M.A., Cervera M., Rodriguez O., Et al., Indicadores de Capital Intelectual aplicados a la Actividad Investigadora y de Gestión del conocimiento en las Universidades y Centros Públicos de Investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid, Capital Intelectual Y producción científica. Madrid: Dirección General De Investigación, Consejería De Educación, Comunidad De Madrid, (2002); Del Valle R., Diseño De Un Modelo De gestión Del Conocimiento Para La UNELLEZ Que Promueva El Desarrollo De Ventajas Competitivas En El área De investigación, (2002); Clemenza C., Ferrer J., Pelekais C., La calidad como elemento competitivo en las Universidades, Revista De Artes Y Humanidades UNICA, 6, 14, pp. 55-83, (2005); Dieterich H., Nueva Guía Para La Investigación Científica, (2011); Downing K., Loock P., Leung H., La Historia Y El Desarrollo De Los Sistemas De clasificación De La educación Superior, (2017); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: The Proven Way to Establish Your company´s Real Value by Measuring Its Hidden Values, (1997); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital. Realizing Yo0ur company´s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital, European Management Journal, 14, 4, pp. 356-364, (1996); Medición Del Capital Intelectual. San Lorenzo Del Escorial, (1998); Gimenez G., Simon B., Una Nueva Perspectiva En La medición Del Capital Humano, (2002); Huang C.C., Luther R., Tayles M., An evidence based taxonomy of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 3, pp. 386-408, (2007); Jackson S., Schuler R., Understanding Human Resource Management in the Context of Organizations and Their Environments, (2007); Lee H., Choi B., Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, pp. 179-228, (2003); Llinas-Audet X., Girotto M.Y., Sole F., La dirección estratégica universitaria y la eficacia de las herramientas de gestión: El caso de las universidades españolas, Revista De Educación, 355, (2011); Marr B.Y., Moustaghfir K., Definiendo el capital intelectual: Un enfoque tridimensional, Decisión De gestión, 43, 9, (2005); Meek V., Wood F., Higher Education Governance and Management: An Australian Case, (1997); Directrices Para La gestión Y difusión De información Sobre Intangibles: Informe De Capital Intelectual, (2002); Metcalfe A., Knowledge Management and Higher Education: A Critical Analysis, (2005); Nava R., Mercado P., Análisis de trayectoria del capital intelectual en una universidad pública mexicana, Revista electrónica De investigación Educativa, 13, 2, pp. 166-187, (2011); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., La organización Creadora Del Conocimiento, (1999); Ordonez De Pablos P., El capital estructural organizativo como fuente de competitividad empresarial: Un estudio de indicadores, Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales, (2003); Ordonez De Pablos P., El capital relacional como fuente de competitividad organizativa: Un estudio de casos, Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales, (2003); Porter M., Estrategia Competitiva, técnicas Para El análisis De Los Sectores Industriales Y De La Competencia (Primera Ed.), (1982); Prayong T., Tasapong K., Knowledge management is a perfect education development tool: Is Thailand’s Higher Education, ready to embrace It?, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 8, 2, (2007); Pringle C., Kroll M., Why Trafalgar was won before it was fought: Lessons from resource-based theory, The Academy of Management Executive, 11, 4, (1997); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Rivero D., Balague J., Vega V., La medición del Capital Intelectual en las universidades: Un modelo para potenciar su aportación a la Sociedad. Capital humano, Revista Para La integración Y Desarrollo De Los Recursos Humanos, 18, 185, pp. 30-37, (2005); Rojas R., El Proceso De La investigación científica, (2007); Saez C., Mejores Universidades De México 2017, (2017); Safieddine A., Jamali D., Noureddine S., Corporate governance and intellectual capital: Evidence from an academic institution, Journal of Corporate Governance, 9, 2, pp. 146-157, (2009); Watson S., Hewett K., A multi-theoretical model of knowledge transfer in organizations: Determinants of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 2, pp. 141-173, (2006); Wong K.Y., Aspinwall E., An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 3, pp. 64-82, (2005); Wright O.M., McMahan G.C., McWilliams A., Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource based perspective, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5, 2, pp. 299-324, (1994)","A.L.Z. Del Castillo; Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Mexico; email: azorrilla@docentes.uat.edu.mx","","Universidad del Zulia","","","","","","13159984","","","","Spanish","Rev. Venez. Gerencia","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85078335500"
"Saengchai S.; Sutduean J.","Saengchai, Sakapas (57210893894); Sutduean, Jutamat (57208031486)","57210893894; 57208031486","The impact of intellectual capital on performance of Universities in Thailand: The mediating role of entrepreneur orientation","2019","International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change","6","10","","381","401","20","1","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074247770&partnerID=40&md5=5d9b054f733374f08a0acd0db7b2b14f","Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand; College of Innovative Business and Accountancy, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand","Saengchai S., Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand; Sutduean J., College of Innovative Business and Accountancy, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand","The prime objective of the current study is to examine the relationship between intellectual capital and the performance of universities in Thailand, and to understand the mediating role of entrepreneur orientation in this relationship. Several gaps have been identified in the literature which require investigation. The first is related to examining the various components of intellectual capital which have been proposed by several researchers. These include relational capital, human capital, and structural capital. Moreover, there is inconsistency in the findings of previous studies related to the impact of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of firms. To achieve the objective of the current study, SEM-PLS was employed. In previous research studies, the focus has been on manufacturing organizations. The study is among the first to address these issues. In sum, SEM-PLS has been used as a statistical tool to address the research questions raised, and the research objectives envisaged, in the current study. The findings of the current study have supported the hypotheses. This study will be helpful for policymakers and researchers. © 2019, Primrose Hall Publishing Group.","Entrepreneur orientation; Intellectual capital; Performance; Thailand; Universities","","","","","","","","Alegre J., Chiva R., Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance, Journal of Small Business Management, 51, 4, pp. 491-507, (2013); Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y., On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, pp. 74-94, (1988); Calvo-Mora A., Leal A., Roldan J.L., Using enablers of the EFQM model to manage institutions of higher education, Quality Assurance in Education, 14, 2, pp. 99-122, (2006); Cassel C., Hackl P., Westlund A.H., Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures, Journal of applied statistics, 26, 4, pp. 435-446, (1999); Chen L., Zhou Y., Zhou D., Xue L., Clustering enterprises into eco-industrial parks: Can interfirm alliances help small and medium-sized enterprises?, Journal of cleaner production, 168, pp. 1070-1079, (2017); Chienwattanasook K., Jermsittiparsert K., Impact of Entrepreneur Education on Entrepreneurial Self-Employment: A Case Study from Thailand, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19, 1, pp. 106-116, (2019); Chin W.W., Newsted P.R., Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares, Statistical strategies for small sample research, 1, 1, pp. 307-341, (1999); Choo C.W., Bontis N., The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, (2002); Cohen S., Kaimenakis N., Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs, The Learning Organization, 14, 3, pp. 241-262, (2007); Covin J.G., Miles M.P., Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage, Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 23, 3, pp. 47-63, (1999); Covin J.G., Slevin D.P., A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 16, 1, pp. 7-26, (1991); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual capital: The proven way to establish your company's real value by finding its hidden brainpower, (1997); Fatula D., Selected micro-and macroeconomic conditions of wages, income and labor productivity in Poland and other European Union countries, Contemporary Economics, 12, 1, pp. 17-32, (2018); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, (1981); Genc E., Dayan M., Genc O.F., The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation, Industrial marketing management., (2019); Gold A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H., Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of management information systems, 18, 1, pp. 185-214, (2001); Gupta V.K., Niranjan S., Markin E., Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of generative and acquisitive learning through customer relationships, Review of Managerial Science, pp. 1-25, (2019); Hair, Sarstedt M., Hopkins L., Kuppelwieser G.V., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research, European Business Review, 26, 2, pp. 106-121, (2014); Hulland J., Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies, Strategic management journal, 20, 2, pp. 195-204, (1999); Hye Q.M.A., Wizarat S., Lau W.Y., Trade-led growth hypothesis: An empirical analysis of South Asian countries, Economic Modelling,, 35, pp. 654-660, (2013); Jermsittiparsert K., Sriyakul T., Rodoonsong S., Power(lessness) of the State in the Globalization Era: Empirical Proposals on Determination of Domestic Paddy Price in Thailand, Asian Social Science, 9, 17, pp. 218-225, (2013); Kamukama N., Ahiauzu A., Ntayi J.M., Intellectual capital and performance: testing interaction effects, Journal of intellectual capital, 11, 4, pp. 554-574, (2010); Klein A., Firm performance and board committee structure, The Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 1, pp. 275-304, (1998); Knight G., Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization, Journal of international marketing, 8, 2, pp. 12-32, (2000); Kubo I., Saka A., An inquiry into the motivations of knowledge workers in the Japanese financial industry, Journal of knowledge management, 6, 3, pp. 262-271, (2002); Kojo R., Paschal N., Urban Population Growth and Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria, Journal of Empirical Studies, 5, 1, pp. 12-19, (2018); Kweka K.H., Ndibalema P., Constraints hindering adoption of ICT in government secondary schools in Tanzania: The case of Hanang District, International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 4, 2, pp. 46-57, (2018); Lan Y.W., Lin D., Lin L., Why are the Performances of Business Groups Different? A Case Study of Formosa Plastics Group and Far Eastern Group, Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, 4, 2, pp. 106-120, (2017); Liu R., Shao Z., Wei G., Wang W., GARCH model with fat-tailed distributions and bitcoin exchange rate returns, Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 1, 1, pp. 71-75, (2017); Lyston T., Restoration for State's Financial Loss as a Countermeasure against Corruption in Indonesia, International Journal of Social Sciences Perspectives, 2, 2, pp. 161-164, (2018); Lumpkin, Dess, Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of management review, 21, 1, pp. 135-172, (1996); Lumpkin G.T., Dess G.G., Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of management review, 21, 1, pp. 135-172, (1996); Makhloufi L., Al-Rejal H.M.E.A., Mohtar S., An Investigation of the Moderating Effect of IT Personnel Capability on the Relationship between Intangible IT Resources and IT Infrastructure Flexibility on the Sustainable Competitive Advantages, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 8, 9, pp. 277-286, (2018); Miller D., The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management science, 29, 7, pp. 770-791, (1983); Mulyani S., Pregnant Women with Extended Family on Knowledge, Motivation, and Readiness In Exclusive Breastfeeding, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, 1, 2, pp. 104-107, (2017); Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H., Psychological theory, 45, pp. 131-147, (1994); Oktavio A., Kaihatu T.S., Kartika E.W., LEARNING ORIENTATION, ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION, INNOVATION AND THEIR IMPACTS ON NEW HOTEL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM SURABAYA, Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17, 1, pp. 8-19, (2019); Olkiewicz M., Quality improvement through foresight methodology as a direction to increase the effectiveness of an organization, Contemporary Economics, 12, 1, pp. 69-80, (2018); Poon J.M., Ainuddin R.A., Junit S.O.H., Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance, International small business journal, 24, 1, pp. 61-82, (2006); Prahalad C.H., Hamel G., G.(1990).-""The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard business review, 68, 3, pp. 295-336, (1990); Roos, Roos J., Measuring your company's intellectual performance, Long range planning, 30, 3, pp. 413-426, (1997); Roos G., Pike S., Fernstrom L., Valuation and reporting of intangibles- state of the art in 2004, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 2, 1, pp. 21-48, (2005); Sanchez V.M.G., Self-employment, Knowledge and Economic Growth: An empirical study for Latin American countries, Contemporary Economics, 12, 4, pp. 473-483, (2018); Sekaran U., Bougie R., Research Methods For Business, A Skill Building Approach, (2003); Shawtari F., Salem M., Hussain H.I., Thabit O., Alaeddin O., Corporate Governance Characteristics and Valuation: Inferences from Quantile Regression, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 21, 41, pp. 81-88, (2016); Swann W.L., Modelling the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, organizational integration, and programme performance in local sustainability, Public Management Review, 19, 4, pp. 542-565, (2017); Urbach N., Ahlemann F., Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares, Journal of Information technology theory and application, 11, 2, pp. 5-40, (2010); Wales W., Gupta V.K., Marino L., Shirokova G., Entrepreneurial orientation: International, global and cross-cultural research, International small business journal, 37, 2, pp. 95-104, (2019); Wetzels M., Odekerken-Schroder G., Van Oppen C., Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS quarterly, pp. 177-195, (2009); Wiklund J., The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship, Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 24, 1, pp. 37-48, (1999); Wiklund J., Shepherd D., Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses, Strategic management journal, 24, 13, pp. 1307-1314, (2003); Wiklund J., Shepherd D., Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach, Journal of business venturing, 20, 1, pp. 71-91, (2005); Wolff J.A., Pett T.L., LEARNING AND SMALL FIRM GROWTH: THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION, (2007); Youndt M., Human Resource Management System, Intellectual Capital and Organizational Performance, Pennsylvania State University. Journal of Management,, 20, pp. 135-139, (1998); Zahra S.A., Covin J.G., Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurshipperformance relationship: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of business venturing, 10, 1, pp. 43-58, (1995); Zhao H., Seibert S.E., Lumpkin G.T., The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Management, 36, 2, pp. 381-404, (2010); Haseeb M., Hussain H., Slusarczyk B., Jermsittiparsert K., Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance, Social Sciences, 8, 5, (2019); Jermsittiparsert K., Pithuk L., Exploring the Link between Adaptability, Information Technology, Agility, Mutual Trust, and Flexibility of a Humanitarian Supply Chain, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5, 2, pp. 432-447, (2019)","J. Sutduean; College of Innovative Business and Accountancy, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand; email: 607191030012@dpu.ac.th","","Primrose Hall Publishing Group","","","","","","22011315","","","","English","Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85074247770"
"Salinas-Ávila J.; Abreu-Ledón R.; Tamayo-Arias J.","Salinas-Ávila, John (57189597918); Abreu-Ledón, René (36871739500); Tamayo-Arias, Johnny (56316143700)","57189597918; 36871739500; 56316143700","Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from Colombian public universities","2020","Journal of Intellectual Capital","21","6","","1053","1084","31","23","10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0223","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85086127002&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-09-2019-0223&partnerID=40&md5=fe22d80f7acec1ec8414960e3017e0c6","Department of Economía y Administración, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; Department of Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales, Colombia; Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de las Villas, Villa Clara, Cuba; Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales, Colombia","Salinas-Ávila J., Department of Economía y Administración, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia, Department of Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales, Colombia; Abreu-Ledón R., Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de las Villas, Villa Clara, Cuba; Tamayo-Arias J., Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales, Colombia","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence on the relationships between the dimensions of intellectual capital (IC) and the generation of knowledge in public universities. Design/methodology/approach: An online survey was developed and administered in Colombia. A total of 209 researchers participated in the study. Data were collected through IC measurements concerning the research mission of the universities. Scientific publications from the respondents and the citations received were taken as proxies for the generation of knowledge. To test the hypotheses, structural equation modeling was used. Findings: Hypotheses proposing a positive association between the dimensions of IC, namely, human capital, structural capital, and relational capital, and the generation of knowledge were tested. The findings highlight that human capital is indirectly and positively related to the generation of knowledge through relational capital, as well as through the path of structural capital-relational capital. Practical implications: The study suggests that directors of research at universities could improve the results of this activity by analyzing and understanding the dimensions of IC that contribute to the development of scientific capacities and the generation of knowledge. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies that has examined the interrelationships between the dimensions of IC at universities and the generation of knowledge. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Colombian public universities; Higher education; Intellectual capital; Research; University performance","","","","","","","","Adekunle O., Bontis N., Managing intellectual capital in Nigerian telecommunications companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 2, pp. 262-282, (2012); Alcaniz L., Gomez-Bezares F., Roslender R., Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: a backward look and a proposal for going forward, Accounting Forum, 35, 2, pp. 104-117, (2011); Allameh S.M., Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: the role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 5, pp. 858-874, (2018); Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, pp. 411-423, (1988); Arbuckle J., IBM SPSS Amos 23 User's Guide, (2014); Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S., Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 3, pp. 396-402, (1977); Arocena R., Sutz Y.J., Universidades para el Desarrollo”, Documento de Trabajo CILAC, (2016); Baron R.M., Kenny D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986); Bazeley P., Conceptualising research performance, Studies in Higher Education, 35, 8, pp. 889-903, (2010); Berman E.P., Paradeise C., Introduction: The University under Pressure, pp. 1-22, (2016); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Rossi F.M., Tartaglia P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bland C.J., Center B.A., Finstad D.A., Risbey K.R., Staples J.G., A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity, Academic Medicine, 80, 3, pp. 225-237, (2005); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., Keow W.C.C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Borg S., Alshumaimeri Y., University teacher educators' research engagement: perspectives from Saudi Arabia, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 3, pp. 347-356, (2012); Borin E., Donato F., Unlocking the potential of IC in Italian cultural ecosystems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 285-304, (2015); Bornmann L., Daniel H.-D., The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?, EMBO Reports, 10, 1, pp. 2-6, (2008); Bozeman B., Corley E., Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, 33, 4, pp. 599-616, (2004); Briggs N., Estimation of the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect in multiple mediator models, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, (2006); Bucheli V., Diaz A., Calderon J., Lemoine P., Valdivia J., Villaveces J., Et al., Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: an intellectual capital-based approach, Scientometrics, 91, 1, pp. 369-382, (2012); Bueno C., Morcillo O.P., Rodriguez P.J., Luque de la Torre M.A., Cervera O.M., Camacho M.C., Et al., Gestion del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos publicos de Investigacion, (2003); Byrne B.M., Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, (2001); Cabrita M.D.R., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry, International Journal of Technology Management, 43, 2-3, (2008); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Chatzkel J., Moving through the crossroads, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 337-339, (2004); Cheng M.Y., Lin J.Y., Hsiao T.Y., Lin T.W., Invested resource, competitive intellectual capital, and corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 4, pp. 433-450, (2010); Cleary P., Quinn M., Intellectual capital and business performance: an exploratory study of the impact of cloud-based accounting and finance infrastructure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 255-278, (2016); Cohen S., Kaimenakis N., Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs, The Learning Organization, 14, 3, pp. 241-262, (2007); Connell H., University research management, (2005); Informe nacional de Competitividad, Disponible en, (2019); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Duenas L.P.L., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Czerniewicz L., Brown C., A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities, Computers and Education, 53, 1, pp. 121-131, (2009); Dameri R.P., Ricciardi F., Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 860-887, (2015); de Frutos-Belizon J., Martin-Alcazar F., Sanchez-Gardey G., Conceptualizing academic intellectual capital: definition and proposal of a measurement scale, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 306-334, (2019); Demartini P., Bernardi C., A management control system for environmental and social initiatives, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 316-331, (2017); Di Berardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Dumay J., The third stage of IC: towards a new IC future and beyond, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 5-9, (2013); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Nielsen C., The past, present, and future for intellectual capital research: an overview, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 1-18, (2017); Edgar F., Geare A., Factors influencing university research performance, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 5, pp. 774-792, (2013); Edvisson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital, (1997); Esposito V., Nito D.E., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: the role of performance management systems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, pp. 431-450, (2013); RICARDIS: Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research Development and Innovation in SMEs”, Report to the Commission from the High Level Expert Groups on RICARDIS, (2006); Evans L., Developing research cultures and researchers in higher education: the role of leadership, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education, (SRHE), (2007); Feng H.-I., Chen C.-S., Wang C.-H., Chiang H.-C., The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer, The Service Industries Journal, 32, 6, pp. 899-917, (2012); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, pp. 39-50, (1981); Giuliani M., Chiucchi M.S., Marasca S., A history of intellectual capital measurements: from production to consumption, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 3, pp. 590-606, (2016); Gonzalez-Loureiro M., Dorrego P.F., Intellectual capital and system of innovation: what really matters at innovative SMEs, Intangible Capital, 8, 2, pp. 239-274, (2012); Guthrie J., Dumay J., New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 258-266, (2015); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-82, (2012); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: the implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Ten years of using knowledge balance sheets in Austrian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 34-52, (2018); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2008); Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 2, pp. 139-152, (2011); Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Ringle C., Sarstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2017); Haustein S., Lariviere V., Incentives and Performance, The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects, pp. 121-139, (2015); Hedjazi Y., Behravan J., Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran, Higher Education, 62, 5, pp. 635-647, (2011); Hellstrom T., Husted K., Mapping knowledge and intellectual capital in academic environments, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 1, pp. 165-180, (2004); Helm-Stevens R., Brown K., Russell J., Introducing the intellectual capital interplay model: advancing knowledge frameworks in the not-for-profit environment of higher education, International Education Studies, 4, 2, pp. 126-140, (2011); Hemmings B., Kay R., The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output, Educational Psychology, 36, 2, pp. 347-361, (2016); Hemmings B.C., Rushbrook P., Smith E., Academics' views on publishing refereed works: a content analysis, Higher Education, 54, 2, pp. 307-332, (2007); Holligan C., Wilson M., Humes W., Research cultures in English and Scottish university education departments: an exploratory study of academic staff perceptions, British Educational Research Journal, 37, 4, pp. 713-734, (2011); Hong P., Yang M.G.M., Dobrzykowski D.D., Strategic customer service orientation, lean manufacturing practices and performance outcomes: an empirical study, Journal of Service Management, 25, 5, pp. 699-723, (2014); Horodnic I.A., Zait A., Motivation and research productivity in a university system undergoing transition, Research Evaluation, 24, 3, pp. 282-292, (2015); Hoyle R.H., Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, (1995); Hsu Y.-H., Fang W., Intellectual capital and new product development performance: the mediating role of organizational learning capability, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 5, pp. 664-677, (2009); Hsu L.-C., Wang C.-H., Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: the mediating role of dynamic capability, British Journal of Management, 23, 2, pp. 179-205, (2010); Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1, pp. 1-55, (1999); Ibarra M.A., Hernandez-Perlines F., Intellectual capital and Organization performance in the manufacturing sector of Mexico, Management Decision, 56, 8, pp. 1818-1834, (2018); Jardon C.M., Martos M.S., Intellectual capital as competitive advantage in emerging clusters in Latin America, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 4, pp. 462-481, (2012); Kim T.T., Kim W.G., Park S.S.-S., Lee G., Jee B., Intellectual capital and business performance: what structural relationships do they have in upper-upscale hotels?, International Journal of Tourism Research, 14, 4, pp. 391-408, (2012); Lee S., Bozeman B., The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35, 5, pp. 673-702, (2005); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital, innovation, and performance: empirical evidence from SMEs, International Journal of Innovation Management, 19, 5, pp. 1-27, (2015); Leitner K.-H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Liang C.-J., Chen H.-J., A study of the impacts of website quality on customerrelationship performance, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20, 9, pp. 971-988, (2009); Lodhi A.S., Factors Affecting the Faculty Retention in the Selected Pakistani Business Schools, (2009); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Lucio-Arias D., Marquez-Bustos N., Análisis de la investigación científica en Colombia a partir de la producción en revistas indexadas en el Web of Science: productividad y visibilidad, Análisis de indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, pp. 53-78, (2016); Maditinos D., Sevi Z., Tsairidis C., Intellectual capital and business performance: an empirical study for the Greek listed companies, European Research Studies, 13, 3, pp. 145-167, (2010); Maltseva A., Veselov I., Lelchitskiy I., Gridchina A., Maimina E., The role of university's intellectual capital in creation of scientific activity's results, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 204-218, (2018); Mariani G., Carlesi A., Scarfo A.A., Academic spinoffs as a value driver for intellectual capital: the case of the University of Pisa, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 202-226, (2018); Martinez-Torres M., A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of Intellectual Capital: an exploratory study, Information and Management, 43, 5, pp. 617-626, (2006); Mercado-Salgado P., Validity of a scale measuring intellectual capital in universities, Universitas Psychologica, 15, 2, pp. 109-120, (2016); Michalak J., Krasodomska J., Rimmel G., Sort J., Trzmielak D., Intellectual capital management in public universities?, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 149-167, (2017); Montemary M., Chiucchi M.S., Enabling intellectual capital measurement through business model: the Nexus case, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 542-567, (2017); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Mumtaz S., Abbas Q., An empirical investigation of intellectual capital affecting the performance: a case of private universities in Pakistan, World Applied Sciences Journal, 32, 7, pp. 1460-1467, (2014); Mura M., Longo M., Developing a tool for intellectual capital assessment: an individual-level perspective, Expert Systems, 30, 5, pp. 436-450, (2013); Nava-Rogel R.M., Mercado-Salgado P., Análisis de trayectoria del capital intelectual en una universidad pública mexicana, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 13, 2, pp. 166-187, (2011); Nguyen T.L.H., The challenges of developing research resources for leading Vietnamese universities, Higher Education Management and Policy, 24, 2, pp. 115-130, (2013); Nguyen T.L.H., Meek V.L., Key considerations in organizing and structuring university research, Journal of Research Administration, 46, 1, pp. 41-62, (2015); Nguyen T.V., Pham L.T., Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: an analysis of ASEAN countries, Scientometrics, 89, 1, pp. 107-117, (2011); Nunnally J., Bernstein I., Psychometric Theory, (1994); OCyT O., Informe anual de indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología, Entornos, 29, 1, (2016); The Knowledge-Based Economy, General Distribution OECD/GD(96)102, (1996); Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society, (2008); Public Research Institutions in National Innovation Systems”. En Public Research Institutions: Mapping Sector Trends, (2011); Evaluaciones de Políticas Nacionales de Educación. La Educación Superior en Colombia, (2012); New Sources of Growth: Knowledge-Based Capital: Key Analyses and Policy Conclusions, (2013); Making Open Science a Reality, (2015); Revisión de políticas nacionales de educación. La Educación en Colombia, (2016); Palumbo R., Berardino D.D., Academic research performance and intellectual capital measurement system: evidence from Italian universities, SSRN Electronic Journal, (2012); Pasupathy R., Siwatu K.O., An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA, Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 4, pp. 728-741, (2014); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., Back to the future of intellectual capital research: a systematic literature review, Management Decision, 56, 11, pp. 2502-2583, (2018); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 355-381, (2019); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Popp J., Balogh P., Olah J., Kot S., Rakos M.H., Lengyel P., Social network analysis of scientific articles published by food policy, Sustainability, 10, 3, (2018); Pratt M., Margaritis D., Coy D., Developing a research culture in a university faculty, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21, 1, pp. 43-55, (1999); Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 3, pp. 879-891, (2008); Quimbo M.A.T., Sulabo E.C., Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions, Studies in Higher Education, 39, 10, pp. 1955-1971, (2014); Ramirez Y., Intellectual capital models in Spanish public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 248-264, (2010); Ramirez Y., Intellectual capital management and reporting in European higher education institutions, Intangible Capital, 9, 1, (2013); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Cost–benefit analysis of intellectual capital disclosure: university stakeholders' view, Revista De Contabilidad, 16, 2, pp. 106-117, (2013); Ramirez Y., Manzaneque M., Priego A.M., Formulating and elaborating a model for the measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish public universities, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83, 1, pp. 149-176, (2017); Reinartz W., Haenlein M., Henseler J., An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 4, pp. 332-344, (2009); El Estado de La Ciencia, Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y TecnologíaIberoamericanos/Interamericanos, (2017); Rodriguez A., Landeta J., Youlianov S., University R&D&T capital: what types of knowledge drive it?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Rodriguez L.L., Medina V.H., Lopez J.F., Knowledge management and intellectual capital in a university context, Knowledge Management in Organizations, KMO 2015, Maribor, Slovenia, pp. 741-753, (2015); Rooney J., Dumay J., Intellectual capital, calculability and qualculation, The British Accounting Review, 48, 1, pp. 1-16, (2016); Rueda-Barrios G., Rodenes-Adams M., Factores determinantes en la producción científica de los grupos de investigación en Colombia, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39, 1, (2016); Samkin G., Schneider A., Past, present, and future: intellectual capital and the New Zealand public sector, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital, pp. 76-98, (2017); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sanchez-Torres J., Rivera S.C., A model for measuring research capacity using an intellectual capital-based approach in a colombian higher education institution, Innovar, 19, 1, pp. 179-197, (2009); Santo S.A., Engstrom M.E., Reetz L., Schweinle W.E., Reed K., Faculty productivity barriers and supports at a school of education, Innovative Higher Education, 34, 2, pp. 117-129, (2009); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Beer C.D., Schutte C.S., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities' competitiveness: the technology transfer offices' role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Serenko A., Bontis N., Investigating the current state and impact of the intellectual capital academic discipline, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 4, pp. 476-500, (2013); Shah R., Goldstein S.M., Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 2, pp. 148-169, (2006); Shih K.H., Chang C.J., Lin B., Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 74-89, (2010); Singh M., Re-inserting the Public-Good into Higher Education Transformation, pp. 1-15, (2013); Smeby J.C., Try S., Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway, Research in Higher Education, 46, 6, pp. 593-619, (2005); Strozek P., A spatial analysis of the knowledge - based economy in Poland, Comparative Economic Research, 17, 4, pp. 222-236, (2014); St-Pierre J., Audet J., Intangible assets and performance: analysis on manufacturing SMEs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 2, pp. 202-223, (2011); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Taylor J., Managing the Unmanageable: the management of research in research-intensive universities, Higher Education Management and Policy, 18, 2, pp. 1-25, (2006); Tsao H.H., Hung Y.C., Intellectual capital and performance in banking industry of Taiwan, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16, 1, pp. 34-52, (2014); Tseng K.A., Lan Y.W., Lu H.C., Chen P.Y., Mediation of strategy on intellectual capital and performance, Management Decision, 51 No. 7, pp. 1488-1509, (2013); Veltri S., Silvestri A., The Free State University integrated reporting: a critical consideration, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 443-462, (2015); Waltman L., Eck N.J.V., The inconsistency of the h-index, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2, pp. 406-415, (2012); Wang W.Y., Chang C., Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 222-236, (2005); Wang Z., Wang N., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); White D., Gunasekaran A., Ariguzo G., The structural components of a knowledge-based economy, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 7, 4, pp. 504-518, (2013); Williams J., Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex Models, (2004); Williams J., Mackinnon D.P., Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 1, pp. 23-51, (2008); Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B., The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science, 316, 5827, pp. 1036-1039, (2007); Yitmen I., Intellectual capital: a competitive asset for driving innovation in engineering design firms, Engineering Management Journal, 23, 2, pp. 3-19, (2011); Zhang M., Qi Y., Wang Z., Pawar K.S., Zhao X., How does intellectual capital affect product innovation performance? Evidence from China and India, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38, 3, pp. 895-914, (2018); Development and Innovation in SMEs: Report to the Commission of the High Level Expert Group on RICARDIS; Encourage Corporate Measuring and Reporting on Research and Other Forms of Intellectual Capital; Support for the Coherent Development of Policies; Specific Programme “Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area, (2006); Wang Z., Wang N., Cao J., Ye X., The impact of intellectual capital – knowledge management strategy fit on firm performance, Management Decision, 54, 8, pp. 1861-1885, (2016)","J. Salinas-Ávila; Department of Economía y Administración, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; email: jhon.salinas@ucaldas.edu.co; J. Salinas-Ávila; Department of Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales, Colombia; email: jhon.salinas@ucaldas.edu.co","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85086127002"
"Leighton J.P.","Leighton, Jacqueline P. (7101772605)","7101772605","The risk–return trade-off: Performance assessments and cognitive validation of inferences","2019","British Journal of Educational Psychology","89","3","","441","455","14","5","10.1111/bjep.12271","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071034990&doi=10.1111%2fbjep.12271&partnerID=40&md5=3fe73812bb237bf4fb993db333336d41","Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, School and Clinical Child Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada","Leighton J.P., Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, School and Clinical Child Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada","Background and Aims: In educational measurement, performance assessments occupy a niche for offering a true-to-life format that affords the measurement of high-level cognitive competencies and the evidence to draw inferences about intellectual capital. However, true-to-life formats also introduce myriad complexities and can skew if not outright distort the accuracy of inferences. For validating claims about test-takers from performance assessments, the collection of evidence about response processes is a necessity of sufficient import that the validation process needs to be labelled a cognitive validation to ensure that the cognitive is not forgotten in the logic of the validation process. Analysis and Example: Cognitive validation is described as a three-pronged process of (1) identifying the knowledge, skills, and attributes associated with the intellectual capital of interest, (2) selecting and/or developing tasks to elicit intellectual capital, and (3) collecting substantive empirical evidence of examinee response processes as part of the overall validity argument. This three-pronged process is illustrated using the American Institute of CPA's (2018) practice analysis, task-based simulations (TBSs), and use of think-aloud interviews to evaluate claims. Conclusions: Although cognitive laboratories and think alouds are used to measure distinct types of response processes as test-takers interact with performance assessments, both methods are among the best for obtaining direct but differential evidence from test-takers. The labour and cost of collecting this evidence are often not done or not done well by many testing programmes. However, for performance assessments to succeed in measuring what they purport to measure, the investment of cognitive validation must be made. © 2019 The British Psychological Society","cognitive validation; higher education; performance assessments; test-based inferences; testing","Academic Performance; Adult; Competency-Based Education; Educational Measurement; Humans; Professional Competence; Students; Universities; Young Adult; academic achievement; adult; curriculum; education; human; procedures; professional competence; student; university; young adult","","","","","Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, SSHRC, (435-2016-0114)","Preparation of this paper was supported by a grant to the author from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC Grant No. 435-2016-0114). Grantees undertaking such projects are encouraged to express freely their professional judgement. This paper, therefore, does not necessarily represent the positions or the policies of the Canadian government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.","Standards for educational and psychological testing, (2014); Practice analysis final report. Maintaining the relevance of the uniform CPA examination, (2016); Uniform CPA examination blueprints, (2018); Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, (2017); Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P.W., Cruikshank K.A., Mayer R.E., Pintrich P.R., Wittrock M.C., A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete edition), (2001); Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E., Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 4, pp. 281-302, (1955); Davey T., Ferrara S., Holland P., Shavelson R., Webb N., Wise L., Psychometric considerations for the next generation of performance assessment, (2015); Davis L.L., Device Effects in Online Assessment: A Literature Review for ACARA, (2015); Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A., Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, (1993); Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A., How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 3, pp. 178-186, (1998); Evans J.S.B.T., Newstead S.E., Allen J.L., Pollard P., Debiasing by instruction: The case of belief bias, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 3, pp. 263-285, (1993); Garcia-Retamero R., Galesic M., How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, pp. 1323-1329, (2010); Kane M., Validation, Educational measurement, pp. 17-64, (2006); Katz I.R., Gorin J.S., Computerizing assessment: Impacts on education stakeholders, Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, pp. 472-489, (2016); Lai M., Tsai M., Yang F., Hsu C., Liu T., Lee S., Tsai C., A review of using eye tracking technology in exploring learning 2000–2012, Educational Research Review, 10, pp. 90-115, (2013); Lane S., Issues in the design and scoring of performance assessments that assess complex skills, Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction: Assessment of higher order thinking skills, pp. 265-302, (2011); Lane S., Stone C.A., Performance assessments, Educational measurement, pp. 387-432, (2006); Leighton J.P., Avoiding misconceptions, misuse, and missed opportunities: The collection of verbal reports in educational achievement testing, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23, 4, pp. 6-15, (2004); Leighton J.P., Using think-aloud interviews and cognitive labs in educational research, (2017); Leighton J.P., Gierl M.J., The learning sciences in educational assessment, (2011); Maddox B., Bayliss A.P., Fleming P., Engelhardt P.E., Edwards S.G., Borgonovi F., Observing response processes with eye tracking in international large-scale assessments: Evidence from the OECD PIAAC assessment, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, pp. 543-558, (2018); McClelland D.C., Testing for competence rather than for intelligence, American Psychologist, 28, pp. 1-14, (1973); McDonald A.S., The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper- and-pencil educational assessments, Computers & Education, 39, pp. 299-312, (2002); Nisbett R.E., Wilson T.D., Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, Psychological Review, 84, 3, pp. 231-259, (1977); Nobes G., Panagiotaki G., Mental models or methodological artefacts? Adults’ naïve responses to a test of children's conceptions of the earth, British Journal of Psychology, 100, pp. 347-363, (2009); Group of national experts on the AHELO feasibility study: AHELO assessment design, (2010); Schultz M.T., Leighton J.P., Stopek J., Talking to test takers – What can test developers learn?, (2017); Schultz M., Stopek J., Leighton J.P., How to talk to test takers: A primer, (2018); Shavelson R.J., On the measurement of competency, Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1, pp. 43-65, (2010); Shavelson R.J., Beckum L., Brown B., A criterion-sampling approach to selecting patrolmen, Police Chief, 16, pp. 55-61, (1974); Shavelson R.J., Webb N.M., Burstein L., Measurement of teaching, Handbook of research on teaching, pp. 328-375, (1985); Shavelson R.J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Marino J., International performance assessment of learning in higher education (iPAL): Research and development, Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education – Cross-national comparisons and perspectives, pp. 193-214, (2018); Weinert F.E., Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification, Defining and selecting key competencies, pp. 45-65, (2001); Willis G.B., Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design: Understanding qualitative research, (2015); Wolf R., Zahner D., Mitigation of test bias in international, cross-cultural assessments of higher order thinking skills, Handbook of research on computational tools for real-world skill development, pp. 319-343, (2015); Zahner D., Ciolfi A., International comparison of a performance-based assessment in higher education, Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education – Cross-national comparisons and perspectives, pp. 215-244, (2018); Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Pant H.A., Lautenbach C., Molerov D., Toepper M., Bruckner S., Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education, (2017); Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Schmidt S., Molerov D., Shavelson R.J., Berliner D., Conceptual fundamentals for a theoretical and empirical framework of positive learning, Positive learning in the age of information, pp. 29-50, (2018); Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Shavelson R.J., Kuhn C., The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 40, pp. 393-411, (2015)","J.P. Leighton; Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, School and Clinical Child Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; email: jacqueline.leighton@ualberta.ca","","John Wiley and Sons Ltd.","","","","","","00070998","","","30883702","English","Br. J. Educ. Psychol.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85071034990"
"Abdulai A.-F.; Murphy L.; Thomas B.","Abdulai, Abdul-Fatahi (57214295180); Murphy, Lyndon (55748310700); Thomas, Brychan (7401507481)","57214295180; 55748310700; 7401507481","UNIVERSITY KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER and INNOVATION PERFORMANCE in FIRMS: The GHANAIAN EXPERIENCE","2020","International Journal of Innovation Management","24","3","2050023","","","","11","10.1142/S1363919620500231","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85064634928&doi=10.1142%2fS1363919620500231&partnerID=40&md5=28405f9c9261d448ccbd993d7b993e9c","Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus Western Ave, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, United Kingdom; University of South Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom","Abdulai A.-F., Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus Western Ave, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, United Kingdom; Murphy L., Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus Western Ave, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, United Kingdom; Thomas B., University of South Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom","This paper examines the association between university-industry collaboration and firm innovation performance, and the effect of informal mechanisms of knowledge transfer on such an association, using data from a survey of 245 firms in Ghana and employing partial least squares structural equation modelling. The results are of significant relevance to the business community and policy-makers in Ghana and West African. We find that while university-industry collaboration is positively related to innovation performance in firms, informal mechanisms of university knowledge transfer do not and negatively moderate the positive association between university-industry collaboration and innovation performance in firms. It is also found that to facilitate innovation outcomes, formal, legal binding contracts are required. The study recommends that university knowledge generation and innovation policies in Ghana encourage formal collaboration between knowledge exchange actors. It is also suggested that improvements need to be made to the efficacy of intellectual property legislation in Ghana. © 2020 World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.","collaboration; global south; informal mechanisms; innovation performance; social capital; University knowledge transfer","","","","","","","","Abdulai A.-F., Murphy L., Thomas B., The influence of industry-university interactions on industrial innovation in Ghana: A structural equation modelling approach, International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 8, 4, pp. 229-244, (2015); Abreu M., Grinevich V., Hughes A., Kitson M., Innovation Research Centre U.K., Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, (2009); Adler P., Kwon S.-W., Social Capital: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, (2000); Amankwah-Amoah J., The evolution of science, technology and innovation policies: A review of the Ghanaian experience, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, pp. 134-142, (2016); Anderson A.R., Jack S.L., The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or a lubricant?, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14, 3, pp. 193-210, (2002); Atuahene F., Re-thinking the missing mission of higher education: An anatomy of the research challenge of African universities, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 46, 4, pp. 321-341, (2011); Bailey T., Cloete N., Pillay P., Universities and economic development in Africa, case study: Ghana and University of Ghana, HERANA, CHET, (2011); Banal-Estanol A., Macho-Stadler I., Perez-Castrillo D., Research output from university-industry collaborative project, Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 539, (2011); Bekkers R., Freitas I.M.B., Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, Research Policy, 37, 10, pp. 1837-1853, (2008); Bessant J., Alexander A., Tsekouras G., Rush H., Lamming R., Developing innovation capability through learning networks, Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 5, pp. 1087-1112, (2012); Beugelsdijk S., Van Schaik T., Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions, Regional Studies, 39, 8, pp. 1053-1064, (2005); Bradley S.R., Hayter C.S., Link A.N., Models and methods of university technology transfer, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9, 6, pp. 571-650, (2013); Castro-Martinez E., Molas-Gallart J., Olmos-Penuela J., Knowledge transfer in the social sciences and the humanities: Informal links in a public research organization, Ingenio Working Paper Series No 2010/12, (2010); Chesbrough H.W., Open innovation and open business models: A new approach to industrial innovation, Globalization and Open Innovation, OECD/Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, (2006); Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F., The open innovation journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm, Technovation, 31, 1, pp. 34-43, (2011); Clancy M.S., Moschini G., Incentives for innovation: Patents, prizes, and research contracts, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35, 2, pp. 206-241, (2013); Cloete N., Bailey T., Pillay P., Bunting I., Maassen P., Universities and Economic Development in Africa, (2011); Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 1-23, (2002); Coleman J.S., Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Science, 94, pp. 95-120, (1988); Conway S., Steward F., Managing and Shaping Innovation, (2009); D'Este P., Patel P., University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?, Research Policy, 36, 9, pp. 1295-1313, (2007); Dooley L., Kirk D., University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 3, pp. 1060-1460, (2007); Dornbusch F., Neuhausler P., Academic knowledge as a driver for technological innovation? Comparing universities, small and large firms in knowledge production and dissemination, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 37, (2013); Drurey C., The Triple Helix Interaction: University-Industry-Government Relations, (2010); Edelman L.F., Bresnen M., Newell S., Scarbrough H., Swan J., The benefits and pitfalls of social capital: Empirical evidence from two organisations in the United Kingdom, British Journal of Management, 15, pp. 59-69, (2004); Edquist C., Hommen L., Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalisation, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe, (2008); Etzkowitz H., Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Social Science Information, 42, 3, pp. 293-337, (2003); Fadahunsi A., Rosa P., Entrepreneurship and illegality: Insights from the Nigerian cross-border trade, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, pp. 397-429, (2002); Fleetham M., Macdonald R., Nigel B., The application of a knowledge transfer model for global impact, The Journal of Innovation Impact, 8, 1, pp. 51-60, (2015); Fontana R., Geuna A., Matt M., Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling, Research Policy, 35, 2, pp. 309-323, (2006); Fountain J.E., Social capital: Its relationship to innovation in science and technology, Science and Public Policy, 25, 2, pp. 103-116, (1998); Freeman C., The 'national system of innovation' in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 5-24, (1995); Fu X., Zanello G., Essegbey G.O., Hou J., Mohnen P., Innovation in low income countries: A survey report, Growth Research Programme Report, (2014); Garcia-Villaverdea P.M., Rodrigo-Alarconb J., Parra-Requenaa G., Ruiz-Ortegaa M.J., Technological dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: The heterogeneous effects of social capital, Journal of Business Research, 83, pp. 51-64, (2018); Gassmann O., Enkel E., Chesbrough H., The future of open innovation, R&D Management, 40, 3, pp. 213-221, (2010); Granovetter M.S., The strength of weak ties, The American Journal of Sociology, 6, pp. 1360-1380, (1973); Grimpe C., Hussinger K., Formal and informal knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: Complementarity effects and innovation performance, Industry and Innovation, 20, 8, pp. 683-700, (2013); Hagedoorn J., Link A.N., Vonortas N.S., Research partnerships, Research Policy, 29, 4-5, pp. 567-586, (2000); Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2014); Herbert W.H., Ghana and South Korea: Explaining development disparities - An essay in honor of Carl Rosberg, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 29, 3-4, (1994); Hitt M.A., Lee H.-U., Yucel E., The importance of social capital in the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among asian and western firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, pp. 353-372, (2002); Hobday M., Firm-level innovation models: Perspectives on research in developed and developing countries, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17, 2, pp. 121-146, (2005); Howells J., Ramlogan R., Cheng S.-L., Innovation and university collaboration: Paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, pp. 703-721, (2012); Huggins R., Johnston A., Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 5, pp. 457-484, (2010); Huggins R., Johnston A., Thompson P., Network capital social capital and knowledge flow: How the nature of inter-organisational networks impact on innovation, Industry and Innovation, 19, 3, pp. 203-232, (2012); Hughes A., Kitson M., Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: New evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 3, pp. 723-750, (2012); Monetary Fund I., World Economic and Financial Surveys, (2017); Islam J.N., Mohajan H.K., Datta R., Organisational models in university-industry collaboration: International perspective, International Journal of Economics and Research, 3, 5, pp. 1-12, (2013); January V., Thomas R., Developing effective university-industry partnerships: An introduction, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 5, 3, pp. 238-243, (2013); Johnston A., Huggins R., The spatio-relational nature of urban innovation system: Univerities, knowlegde intense bsuiness service firms and collaboartive networks, Journal of Urban Technology, 23, 1, pp. 29-52, (2016); Kamien M.I., Zang I., Meet me halfway: Research joint ventures and absorptive capacity, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp. 995-1012, (2000); Kneller R., Mongeon M., Cope J., Garner C., Ternouth P., Industry-university collaborations in Canada, Japan, the UK and USA - With emphasis on publication freedom and managing the intellectual property lock-up problem, PLoS One, 9, 3, (2014); Kock N., Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM, International Journal of E-Collaboration, 10, 1, pp. 1-13, (2014); Kogut B., Zander U., Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organisation Science, 3, 3, pp. 383-397, (1992); Kogut B., Zander U., Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 4, pp. 516-529, (1993); Kraaijenbrink J., Wijnhoven F., Groen A., Towards a kernel theory of external knowledge integration for high-tech firms: Exploring a failed theory test, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 8, pp. 1215-1233, (2007); Kremer M., Williams H., Incentivising innovation: Adding to the tool kit, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 10, 1, pp. 1-17, (2010); Kruss G., Adeoti J., Nabudere D., Universities and knowledge-based development in sub-Saharan Africa: Comparing University-Firm Interaction in Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa, Journal of Development Studies, 48, 4, pp. 516-530, (2012); Lam A., Embedded firms embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures, Organisational Studies, 18, 6, pp. 973-996, (1997); Lam A., Tacit knowledge organisational learning and social institutions: An integrated framework, Organisational Studies, 21, 3, pp. 487-513, (2000); Landry R., Amara N., Rherrad I., Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others?, Evidence from Canadian Universities. Research Policy, 35, 10, pp. 1599-1615, (2006); Leeuwis C., Wvd Ban A., Communication for Rural Innovation - Rethinking Agricultural Extension, (2004); Matlay H., Sparrow J., Tarkowski K., Lancaster N., Mooney M., Evolving knowledge integration and absorptive capacity perspectives upon university-industry interaction within a university, Education+Training, 51, 8-9, pp. 648-664, (2009); National Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, (2010); Mohamedbhai G., The Effects of Massification on Higher Education in Africa, (2008); Mosey S., Wright M., Clarysse B., Transforming traditional university structures for the knowledge economy through multidisciplinary institutes, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 3, pp. 587-607, (2012); Mothe C., Quelin B., Creating competencies through collaboration: The case of EUREKA R&D Consortia, European Management Journal, 18, 6, pp. 590-604, (2000); Mouton J., Science and Technology: A Baseline Study on Science and Technology and Higher Education in the SADC Region, (2008); Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N., Universities in National Innovation Systems: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, (2005); Munyoki J., Kibera F., Ogutu M., Extent to which university-industry linkage exists in Kenya: A study of medium and large manufacturing firms in selected industries in Kenya, Business Administration and Management, 1, 4, pp. 163-169, (2011); Murphy J.T., Networks, trust, and innovation in Tanzania's manufacturing sector, World Developement, 3, 4, pp. 591-619, (2002); Murphy L., Huggins R., Thompson P., Social capital and innovation: A comparative analysis of regional policies, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 6, pp. 1025-1057, (2016); Mwamadzingo M., The Interaction of Universities and Industry in Science and Technology in Kenya, (1996); Nunally J.C., Bernstein I.H., Psychometric Theory, (1994); Nurse P., Ensuring A Successful UK Research Endeavour: A Review of the UK Research Councils (1324), (2014); Obeng B.A., Robson P., Haugh P., Strategic entrepreneurship and small firms growth in Ghana, International Small Business Journal, 32, 5, pp. 501-524, (2012); Okantey P.C., The need for innovation in Ghanaian universities and colleges, Strategic Leadership Review, 4, 2, pp. 28-36, (2014); Oppong M., Owiredu A., Churchill R.Q., Micro and small scale enterprise development in Ghana, European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research, 2, 6, pp. 84-97, (2014); The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, (2005); Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, (2005); Governance of Higher Education, Research and Innovation in Ghana, Kenya and Uganda, (2013); Osabutey E.L.C., Jin Z., Factors influencing technology and knowledge transfer: Configurational recipes for Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Business Research, 69, 11, pp. 5390-5395, (2016); Osei B., Baah-Nuakoh A., Tutu K., Sowa N., Impact of Structural Adjustment on Small-Scale Enterprises in Ghana, (1993); Pertuze J.A., Calder E.S., Greitzer E.M., Lucas W.A., Best practice for industry-university collaboration, Mit Sloan Management Review, 51, 4, pp. 83-90, (2010); Ponds R., Oort F.V., Frenken K., Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 2, pp. 231-255, (2010); Porter M.E., Ketels C.H.M., UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage, (2003); Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, (1993); Robson P.J.A., Haugh H.M., Obeng B.A., Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: Enterprising Africa, Small Business Economics, 32, 3, pp. 331-350, (2009); Rossi F., Rosli A., Indicators of university-industry knowledge transfer performance and their implication for universities: Evidence from the UK's HE-BCI survey, CIMR Research Working Paper Series, 13, (2013); Rutherford T., Holmes J., Engineering networks: University-industry networks in Southern Ontario automotive industry clusters, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 2, pp. 247-264, (2008); Saad M., Mahdi S., Abdrazak A., Datta S., Mapping the diverse roles of universities in supporting innovation: Opportunities and challenges for Algeria, Indonesia, Malaysia and India, Triple Helix Conf. VIII, (2010); Samson D., Gloet M., Singh P., Systematic innovation capability: Evidence from case studies and a large survey, International Journal of Innovation Management, 21, 7, pp. 1-43, (2017); Sawyerr A., Challenges facing African universities: Selected issues, African Studies Review, 47, 1, pp. 1-59, (2004); Siegel D.S., Waldman D.A., Atwater L.E., Link A.N., Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 1, pp. 111-133, (2003); Singer S., Peterka S., From ignoring to leading change: What role do universities play in developing countries? (Case of Croati), 7th Triple Helix Conf. : University, Industry and Government Linkages, (2009); Sleuwaegen L., Goedhuys M., Growth of firms in developing coutries, evidence from Cote D'Ivoire, Journal of Developement Economics, 68, pp. 117-135, (2002); Smith E.A., The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 4, pp. 311-321, (2001); Sorenson O., Fleming L., Science and the diffusion of knowledge, Research Policy, 33, pp. 1615-1634, (2004); Takyi-Asiedu S., Some socio-cultrual factors retarding entrepreneural activities in Sub Saharan Africa, Journal of Business Ventures, 8, pp. 91-98, (1993); Tetteh E.K., Essegbey G.O., Firm level innovation: The case of Ghanaian firms, European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 2, 2, pp. 1-18, (2014); Theodorakopoulos N., Bennett D., Sanchez Preciado D.J., Intermediation for technology diffusion and user innovation in a developing rural economy: A social learning perspective, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26, 7-8, pp. 645-662, (2014); Thomas B., Brooksbank D., Thompson R.J.H., A study of optimising the regional infrastructure for higher education global start-ups in Wales, International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 3, 2, pp. 220-237, (2009); Thomas B., Packham G., Miller C., Technological innovation, entrepreneurship, higher education and economic regeneration in Wales: A policy study, Industry and Higher Education, 20, 6, pp. 433-440, (2006); Van Rijn F., Bulte E., Adekunle A., Social capital and agricultural innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa, Agricultural Systems, 108, pp. 112-122, (2012); Victoria G.-M., Sijde Der P.Van, Groenewegen P., Baaken T., Nurture over nature; How do European Universities support their collaboration with business?, Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1, pp. 1-22, (2015); Wang Y., Lu L., Knowledge transfer through effective university-industry interactions: Empirical experiences from China, Journal of Technology Management in China, 2, 2, pp. 119-133, (2007); Xiao Z., Anni T.S., When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, pp. 1-13, (2007); Yusof Z.A., Economic Growth in Malaysia - Some Possible Lessons for Ghana, (2010); Zhu B., Habisch A., Thogersen J., The importance of cultural values and trust for innovation - A European study, International Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 2, pp. 1-28, (2018)","L. Murphy; Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Llandaff Campus Western Ave, CF5 2YB, United Kingdom; email: ljmurphy@cardiffmet.ac.uk","","World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd","","","","","","13639196","","","","English","Int. J. Innov. Manage.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85064634928"
"Uriguen Aguirre P.A.; Avolio Alecchi B.E.","Uriguen Aguirre, Patricia Alexandra (58244029700); Avolio Alecchi, Beatrice Elcira (57195399095)","58244029700; 57195399095","Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance through intrinsic motivation in higher education institutions","2023","Cogent Business and Management","10","1","2189772","","","","2","10.1080/23311975.2023.2189772","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85158944677&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2189772&partnerID=40&md5=8ef627740b91de29acc61c2dae873235","CENTRUM Catolica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru; Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru","Uriguen Aguirre P.A., CENTRUM Catolica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru; Avolio Alecchi B.E., CENTRUM Catolica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru","The purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational performance with the mediating rol of intrinsic motivation in higher education institutions. We conducted an empirical study with a sample of 815 employees from public and private universities in Ecuador. Data were obtained from an instrument adapted the previous researchadministered to faculty and administrative staff in management positions. A structural equation modelling approach was used to analyze the relationships between variables and their magnitude and direction. The results showed a significant relationship between intellectual capital and organizational performance, with a partial mediation of intrinsic motivation. No significant differences were found in the effect of intellectual capital between public and private universities. Managers who aim to improve the performance of their organizations with their intellectual capital can benefit from the intrinsic motivation of their employees. This research shows intrinsic motivation as a mediator between intellectual capital and organizational performance, but also analyzes their relationships based on the Self-Determination Theory, which is a novelty according to the existing literature. © 2023 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.","higher education institutions; Intellectual capital; intrinsic motivation; organizational performance; self-determination theory","","","","","","","","Abubakar A., Hilman H., Kaliappen N., New tools for measuring global academic performance, Sage Open, 8, 3, pp. 1-21, (2018); Agostini L., Nosella A., Filippini R., Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 400-418, (2017); Ahmed S.S., Guozhu J., Mubarik S., Khan M., Khan E., Intellectual capital and business performance: The role of dimensions of absorptive capacity, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 1, pp. 23-39, (2019); Almatrooshi B., Singh S.K., Farouk S., Determinants of organizational performance: A proposed framework, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65, 6, pp. 844-859, (2016); Alvino F., DiVaio A., Hassan R., Palladino R., Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 1, pp. 76-94, (2021); Anra Y., Yamin M., Relationships between lecturer performance, organizational culture, leadership, and achievement motivation, Foresight and STI Governance, 11, 2, pp. 92-97, (2017); Aramburu N., Saenz J., Structural capital, innovation capability, and size effect: An empirical study, Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 3, pp. 307-325, (2011); Barral M.R.M., Ribeiro F.G., Canever M.D., Influence of the university environment in the entrepreneurial intention in public and private universities, RAUSP Management Journal, 53, 1, pp. 122-133, (2018); Barrena-Martinez J., Livio C., Ferrandiz E., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm, Journal of Business Research, 112, pp. 261-270, (2019); Bentler P.M., Comparative fit indices in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 2, pp. 238-246, (1990); Bhandari K.R., Rana S., Paul J., Salo J., Relative exploration and firm performance: Why resource-theory alone is not sufficient?, Journal of Business Research, 118, pp. 363-377, (2020); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: A literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bollen K.A., A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models, Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 3, pp. 303-316, (1989); Bontis N., Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 1, pp. 41-60, (2011); Bowles S., Polania-Reyes S., Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements?, Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 2, pp. 368-425, (2012); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, pp. 51-71, (2019); Byrne B.M., Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 2, pp. 272-300, (2004); Cetin F., Askun D., The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation, Management Research Review, 41, 2, pp. 186-201, (2018); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: A structural modelling perspective from north Indian universities, International Journal of Educational Development, 56, pp. 52-61, (2017); Cheung G.W., Rensvold R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 2, pp. 233-255, (2002); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Deci E., Olafsen A., Ryan R., Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 1, pp. 19-43, (2017); De Matos Pedro E., Alves H., Leitao J., In search of intangible connections: Intellectual capital, performance and quality of life in higher education institutions, Higher Education, 83, 2, pp. 243-260, (2020); DiBerardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Dysvik A., Kuvaas B., Gagne M., An investigation of the unique, synergistic, and balanced relationships between basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 5, pp. 1050-1064, (2013); Firat M., Kilinc H., Yuzer T.V., Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e-learning environments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 1, pp. 63-70, (2017); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 3, pp. 382-388, (1981); Frey B.S., Jegen R., Motivation crowding theory, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 5, pp. 589-611, (2001); Froiland J.M., Worrell F.C., Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school, Psychology in the Schools, 53, 3, pp. 321-336, (2016); Frondizi R., Fantauzzi C., Colasanti N., Fiorani G., The evaluation of universities’ third mission and intellectual capital: Theoretical analysis and application to Italy, Sustainability, 11, 12, (2019); Gagne M., Deci E.L., Self-determination theory and work motivation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 4, pp. 331-362, (2005); Garbers Y., Konradt U., The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1, pp. 102-137, (2014); Guthrie J., Dumay J., New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 258-266, (2015); Hair J., Hult G., Ringle C., Sarstedt M., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), (2017); Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1, pp. 115-135, (2015); Henseler J., Ringle C., Sinkovics R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 20, pp. 277-319, (2009); Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1, pp. 1-55, (1999); Iqbal A., Latif F., Marimon F., Sahibzada U.F., Hussain S., From knowledge management to organizational performance: Modelling the mediating role of innovation and intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32, 1, pp. 36-59, (2019); Jinhai Y., Checkland K., Wilson P.M., Howard S.J., Agency autonomy, public service motivation, and organizational performance, Public Management Review, 25, 1, pp. 150-174, (2021); Jobira A.F., Mohammed A.A., Predicting organizational performance from motivation in Oromia Seed Enterprise Bale Branch, Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8, 66, pp. 1-7, (2021); Joshi M., Cahill D., Sidhu J., Kansal M., Intellectual capital and financial performance: An evaluation of the Australian financial sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 264-285, (2013); Juliya T., Intellectual capital cost management, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, pp. 792-796, (2015); Jyoti J., Rani A., High performance work system and organisational performance: Role of knowledge management, Personnel Review, 46, 8, pp. 1770-1795, (2017); Kanfer R., Frese M., Johnson R.E., Motivation related to work: A century of progress, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 3, pp. 338-355, (2017); Kengatharan N., A knowledge-based theory of the firm: Nexus of intellectual capital, productivity and firms’ performance, International Journal of Manpower, 40, 6, pp. 1056-1074, (2019); Khalid N., Ahmed U., Tundikbayeva B., Ahmed M., Entrepreneurship and organizational performance: Empirical insight into the role of entrepreneurial training, culture and government funding across higher education institutions in Pakistan, Management Science Letters, 9, 5, pp. 755-770, (2019); Khan S.Z., Yang Q., Waheed A., Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 2, pp. 285-295, (2018); Kianto A., Saenz J.Y., Aramburu N., Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation, Journal of Business Research, 81, pp. 11-20, (2017); Kirby J., Toward a theory of high performance, Harvard Business Review, 83, 7, pp. 30-39, (2005); Klafke R., De Oliveira M.C.V., Ferreira J.M., The good professor: A comparison between public and private universities, Journal of Education, 200, 1, pp. 62-70, (2020); Kline R.B., Methodology in the social sciences. principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (2011); Konno N., Schillaci E.S., Intellectual capital in society 5.0 by the lens of the knowledge creation theory, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 3, pp. 478-505, (2021); Koohang A., Paliszkiewicz J., Goluchowski J., The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117, 3, pp. 521-537, (2017); Kuvaas B., Buch R., Weibel A., Dysvik A., Nerstad C.G.L., Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes?, Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, pp. 244-258, (2017); Liao S.H., Wu C.C., The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance, International Journal of Business and Management, 4, 4, pp. 64-76, (2009); Li S., Jia R., Seufert J., Hu W., Luo J., The impact of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing strategic human resource management on performance: The mediating roles of emotional capability and intellectual capital, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60, 3, pp. 453-478, (2021); Liu X., Lyu B., Fan J., Yu S., Xiong Y., Chen H., A study on influence of psychological capital of Chinese university teachers upon job thriving: Based on motivational work behavior as an intermediary variable, Sage Open, 11, 2, (2021); Lombardi S., Cavaliere V., Giustiniano L., Cipollini F., What money cannot buy: The detrimental effect of rewards on knowledge sharing, European Management Review, 17, 1, pp. 153-170, (2019); Lyn Chan J.I., Muthuveloo R., Antecedents and influence of strategic agility on organizational performance of private higher education institutions in Malaysia, Studies in Higher Education, 46, 8, pp. 1-14, (2019); Manganelli L., Thibault Landry A., Forest J., Carpentier J., Self-determination theory can help you generate performance and well-being in the workplace: A review of the literature, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20, 2, pp. 227-240, (2018); Martin N., Martin V., Trevilla C., The influence of employee motivation on knowledge transfer, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 6, pp. 478-490, (2009); Mehralian G., Peikanpour M., Rangchian M., Aghakhani H., Managerial skills and performance in small businesses: The mediating role of organizational climate, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14, 3, pp. 361-377, (2020); Mohammadi S., Karupiah P., Quality of work life and academic staff performance: A comparative study in public and private universities in Malaysia, Studies in Higher Education, 45, 6, pp. 1093-1107, (2019); Mostafa A.A., Hussin N., Jabbar H.K., Ibithal A., Othman R., Mohammed A., Intellectual capital and firm performance classification and motivation: Systematic literature review, Test Engineering and Management, 83, pp. 28691-28703, (2020); Muzafary S., Ali I., Hussain M., Mdletshe B., Tilwani S.A., Khattak R., Intrinsic rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of job autonomy and proactive personality: A perspective of self-determination theory, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15, 2, pp. 701-725, (2021); Nicolo G., Manes-Rossi F., Christiaens J., Aversano N., Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities, Journal of Management & Governance, 24, 4, pp. 1055-1087, (2020); Nicolo G., Raimo N., Polcini P.T., Vitolla F., Unveiling the link between performance and Intellectual Capital disclosure in the context of Italian public universities, Evaluation and Program Planning, 88, (2021); Nunnally J.C., Psychometric theory, (1978); Ouakouak M.L., Ouedraogo N., Fostering knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 4, pp. 757-779, (2018); Pirohov-Toth B., Role of management in the effect on employee motivation of organizational performance–Hungarian case study, Journal of Economics and Business, 2, 2, pp. 1-8, (2019); Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5, pp. 879-903, (2003); Quintero-Quintero W., Blanco-Ariza A., Garzon M., Mikhailov O., Intellectual capital: A review and bibliometric analysis, Publications, 9, 4, pp. 1-23, (2021); Rehman U., Aslam E., Iqbal A., Intellectual capital efﬁciency and bank performance: Evidence from Islamic banks, Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, 1, pp. 113-121, (2021); Rigby C.S., Ryan R.M., Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20, 2, pp. 133-147, (2018); Rohim A., Budhiasa I.G.S., Organizational culture as moderator in the relationship between organizational reward on knowledge sharing and employee performance, Journal of Management Development, 38, 7, pp. 538-560, (2019); Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, The American Psychologist, 55, 1, pp. 68-78, (2000); Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1, pp. 1-11, (2020); Sabir A., Motivation: Outstanding way to promote productivity in employees, American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2, 3, pp. 35-40, (2017); Salinas-Avila J., Abreu-Ledon R., Tamayo-Arias J., Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: An empirical study from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 1053-1084, (2020); Scales P.C., Van Boekel M., Pekel K., Syvertsen A.K., Roehlkepartain E.C., Effects of developmental relationships with teachers on middle‐school students’ motivation and performance, Psychology in the Schools, 57, 4, pp. 646-677, (2020); Schumacher R.E., Lomax R.G., A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, (1996); Shi D., Lee T., Maydeu-Olivares A., Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 2, pp. 1-25, (2018); Shoraj D., Llaci S., Motivation and its impact on organizational effectiveness in Albanian businesses, Sage Open, 5, 2, pp. 1-8, (2015); Shujahat M., Ali B., Nawaz F., Durst S., Kianto A., Translating the impact of knowledge management into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role ofknowledge-worker satisfaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28, 4, pp. 200-212, (2017); Taylor G., Jungert T., Mageau G.A., Schattke K., Dedic H., Rosenfield S., Koestner R., A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 4, pp. 342-358, (2014); Tjahjadi B., Soewarno N., Astri E., Hariyati H., Does intellectual capital matter in performance management system-organizational performance relationship? Experience of higher education institutions in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 4, pp. 533-554, (2019); Tomal D.R., Jones K.J., A comparison of core competencies of women and men leaders in the manufacturing industry, The Coastal Business Journal, 14, 1, pp. 13-25, (2015); Tran G., Bich N., Factors affecting work motivation of office workers–a study in ho chi minh city, vietnam, Journal B&It, 2, 2, pp. 2-13, (2018); Vroom V.H., Work and motivation, (1964); Wall A., The measurement and management of intellectual capital in the public sector, Public Management Review, 7, 2, pp. 289-303, (2005); Weqar F., Khan A.M., Raushan M.A., Haque S.M.I., Measuring the impact of intellectual capital on the financial performance of the finance sector of India, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 3, pp. 1134-1151, (2020); Weston R., Gore P.A., A brief guide to structural equation modeling, The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 5, pp. 719-751, (2006); William Y.D., Pelto E., Customer knowledge sharing in cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The role of customer motivation and promise management, Journal of International Management, 27, 4, pp. 1-22, (2021); Yeganeh M.V., Sharahi B.Y., Mohammadi E., Beigi F.H., A survey of intellectual capital in public and private insurance companies of Iran case: Tehran City, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, pp. 602-609, (2014); Zhang M., Qi Y., Wang Z., Pawar K.S., Zhao X., How does intellectual capital affect product innovation performance? Evidence from China and India, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38, 3, pp. 895-914, (2018)","P.A. Uriguen Aguirre; CENTRUM Catolica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru; email: puriguen@pucp.edu.pe","","Cogent OA","","","","","","23311975","","","","English","Cogent Bus. Manag.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85158944677"
"Paudel K.P.; Bhattarai P.C.; Chalise M.","Paudel, Krishna Prasad (57782506700); Bhattarai, Prakash C. (55963694600); Chalise, Mahanand (57225141767)","57782506700; 55963694600; 57225141767","Interdependencies between knowledge management and academic performance in higher educational institutions","2023","VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","53","4","","748","765","17","3","10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2021-0005","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109335972&doi=10.1108%2fVJIKMS-01-2021-0005&partnerID=40&md5=36112588d6de482c99542de5c6d0bc97","School of Education, Kathmandu University, Hattiban, Lalitpur, Nepal; School of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal","Paudel K.P., School of Education, Kathmandu University, Hattiban, Lalitpur, Nepal; Bhattarai P.C., School of Education, Kathmandu University, Hattiban, Lalitpur, Nepal; Chalise M., School of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the interdependent relationship between knowledge management and the academic performance of faculty members in higher educational institutions (HEIs) in Nepal. Design/methodology/approach: This study applied survey research to identify the interdependencies between knowledge management and academic performance in the context of HEIs. The data were collected from the 445-academic staff of four different universities of Nepal by using the self-constructed questionnaire, using Delphi methods. Factor analysis was applied to identify the dimensions of knowledge management and academic performance and canonical correlation analysis was applied to examine the interdependent relationship between dimensions of knowledge management and academic performance. Findings: The factor analysis explored the following seven dimensions of knowledge management: knowledge utilization, acquisition, generation, dissemination, transfer, creation and presentation and four dimensions of academic performance as research and publication, innovation, interactive learning and capacity building. The analysis of canonical correlation showed the interdependent relationship between knowledge utilization, acquisition, generation and dissemination with research, publication and capacity building; knowledge creation with innovation; and knowledge transfer and presentation with interactive learning. Practical implications: This study was carried out based on the day-to-day practices and perceptions of the faculty members of four different universities in Nepal. The changing context of global practices in academia, organizational structure and thoughts of faculty members are changing rapidly. It demands the practical aspects of transferring tacit knowledge to explicit one to enhance intellectual capital of individual. Originality/value: In a country such as Nepal, the concept of knowledge management is in an emerging stage and has been applied to some financial institutions so far. In this context, this paper presents a study that was carried out to explore the interdependence of knowledge management practices in HEIs to enhance academic activities and discourses. The knowledge management further strengthen the intellectual capital of individual and institution and impacts on overall development of knowledge economy of nation. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Academic performance; Faculty members; HEIs; Innovation in universities; Knowledge creation; Knowledge management","Educational technology; Factor analysis; Learning systems; Multivariant analysis; Surveys; Academic performance; Educational institutions; Factors analysis; Faculty members; High educational institution; Innovation in university; Interactive learning; Knowledge creations; Knowledge presentation; Knowledge utilization; Knowledge management","","","","","Purbanchal University; Pokhara University, PU; Kathmandu University, KU; Tribhuvan University, TU","The authors are very thankful to their research participants, the faculty members of higher educational institutions of Nepal, namely Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu University, Purbanchal University, and Pokhara University for the patience to fill in the questionnaire for this research.","Abbass N.S., Importance of knowledge management at Mauritius institution of education, International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 9, 11, pp. 134-145, (2017); Akinnuwesi B.A., Odumabo A., Aribisala B.S., Knowledge grid: an intelligent system for collaboration and knowledge management in Nigerian universities, Data Science Journal, 19, 1, (2020); Arsenijevic J., Tot V., Arsenijevic D., The comparison of two groups in perception of knowledge management in the environment of higher education, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 9, pp. 1916-1923, (2010); Asif R., Merceron A., Ali S.A., Haider N.G., Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining, Computers and Education, 113, pp. 177-194, (2017); Baptista-Nunes B.J.M., Kanwal S., Arif M., Knowledge management practices in higher education institutions, A Systematic Literature Review, (2017); Bartz A.E., Basic Statistical Concepts, (1999); Bassi L., Harnessing the power of intellectual capital, The Journal of Applied Manufacturing Systems, 9, pp. 29-35, (1998); Batista F.F., Massaro M., Dal Mas F., Garlatti A., The relationship between knowledge management and innovation in large companies: a structured literature review, 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2017), (2017); Bello O.W., Oyekunle R.A., Attitude, perceptions and motivation towards knowledge sharing: views from universities in Kwara state, Nigeria, African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 24, 2, pp. 123-134, (2014); Berraies S., Chaher M., Yahia K.B., Knowledge management enablers, knowledge creation process and innovation performance: an empirical study in Tunisian information and communication technologies sector, Business Management and Strategy, 5, 1, pp. 1-26, (2014); Byukusenge E., Munene J., Orobia L., Knowledge management and business performance: mediating effect of innovation, Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 4, 4, pp. 82-92, (2016); Coukos-Semmel E.D., Knowledge management: processes and strategies used in United States research universities, (2002); Cranfield D., Knowledge management and higher education: a UK case study using grounded theory, (2011); Croasmun J., Ostrom L., Using likert-type scales in the social sciences, Journal of Adult Education, 40, 1, pp. 19-22, (2011); Dalkir K., Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, (2005); Davenport T.H., Prusak L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, (1998); Donate M.J., Guadamillas F., Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 6, pp. 890-914, (2011); Edwards J.S., A process view of knowledge management: it ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 4, pp. 297-306, (2011); Fairweather J.S., Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, pp. 2194-2310, (1996); Galbreath J., Knowledge management technology in education: an overview, Educational Technology, 40, 5, pp. 28-33, (2000); Gautam S., Bhattarai P.C., Sharma T.N., Understanding the policies, priorities, and roles, Higher Education in Nepal: Policies and Perspectives, pp. 51-61, (2020); Goud N.V., Venugopal N.M., Anitha S.Y., Impact of knowledge management in higher education, on Knowledge management in institutes of higher learning 2006 proceedings of the international conference, (2006); Hair J.F.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis, (1998); Hameed S., Badii A., Effectiveness of knowledge management functions in improving the quality of education in higher education institutions, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2, 4, pp. 319-323, (2012); Hazelkorn E., Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence, (2015); Hilman H., Abubakar A., Strategic talent management and university performance: a theoretical perspective, European Journal of Business and Management, 9, 4, pp. 35-40, (2017); Howell K.E., Annan-Singh F., Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: a tale of two cultures, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1, pp. 32-39, (2013); Huang K., Capitalizing on intellectual assets, IBM Systems Journal, 37, 4, pp. 570-584, (1998); Jones J.S., Linderman K., Process management, innovation and efficiency performance, Business Process Management Journal, 20, 2, pp. 335-358, (2014); Joseph M.F., Key issues in knowledge management: knowledge and innovation, Journal of the Knowledge Management Consortium International, 1, 3, pp. 8-38, (2001); Kalling T., The lure of simplicity: learning perspectives on innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 1, pp. 65-89, (2007); Keeney S., Hasson F., McKenna H., The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research, (2011); Koch C., Knowledge management in consulting engineering: joining IT and human resources to support the production of knowledge, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10, 6, pp. 391-401, (2003); Kurniawati A., Samadhi M.A.A., Wiratmadja I.I., Sunaryo I., Rizana A.F., Enhancing innovation through knowledge management: a systematic literature review on empirical findings, International Journal of Knowledge Engineering, 4, 1, pp. 43-49, (2018); Lee H.Y., Department chairs’ perceptions of knowledge management strategies in colleges of education: measurement of performance and importance by organizational factors, (2007); Linstone H.A., Turoff M., The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, (2002); Manhart M., Thalmann S., Protecting organizational knowledge: a structured literature review, Journal of Knowledge Management, 19, 2, pp. 190-211, (2015); Mao H., Liu S., Zhang J., How the effects of IT and knowledge capability on organizational agility are contingent on environmental uncertainty and information intensity, Information Development, 31, 4, pp. 358-382, (2015); Marsh H.W., Hattie J., The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 5, pp. 603-641, (2002); Mavodza J., Ngulube P., Knowledge management practices at an institution of higher learning, South African Journal of Information Management, 14, 1, pp. 1-8, (2012); McCarthy A.F., Knowledge management: evaluating strategies and processes used in higher education, (2006); Merlo T.R., Factors Influencing Knowledge Management Use in Technology Enterprises in Southern United States, (2016); Mohayidin M.G., Azirawani N., Kamaruddin N., Margono M.I., The application of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian universities, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 3, pp. 301-312, (2007); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, (1995); Parlby D., The Power of Knowledge: A Business Guide to Knowledge Management, (1997); Patel T.R., Patil A.N., Review of knowledge management in higher education, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4, 11, pp. 2062-2065, (2016); Paudel K.P., Expectations and realities of knowledge management: experiences from higher education in developing countries, Education and Development, 29, pp. 89-102, (2019); Paudel K.P., Constructing scale on knowledge management: appreciating standard or self-constructed tools?, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Crossing the Border, 7, 2, pp. 32-43, (2019); Petrides L.A., Nodine T.R., Knowledge Management in Education: Defining the Landscape, (2003); Pinilla B., Munoz S., Educational opportunities and academic performance: a case study of university student mothers in Venezuela, Higher Education, 50, 2, pp. 299-322, (2005); Rowley J., Is higher education ready for knowledge management?, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 7, pp. 325-333, (2000); Rummel R.J., Understanding factor analysis, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 4, pp. 444-480, (1967); Santos J.R.A., Cronbach’s alpha: a tool of assessing the reliability scales, Journal of Extension, 37, 2, pp. 1-5, (1999); Shenoy G.V., Madan P., Statistical Methods in Business and Social Sciences, (1994); Siadat S.A., Hoveida R., Abbaszadeh M., Moghtadaie L., Knowledge creation in universities and some related factors, Journal of Management Development, 31, 8, pp. 845-872, (2012); Steinberger E.D., Improving Student Achievement, (1993); Sunalai S., Beyerlein M., Exploring knowledge management in higher education institutions: processes, influences, and outcomes, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19, 3, (2015); Tan C.N.L., Noor S., Knowledge management enablers, knowledge sharing and research collaboration: a study of knowledge management at research universities in Malaysia, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21, 2, pp. 251-276, (2013); Thomas M., Thomas H., Using new social media and web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning, Journal of Management Development, 31, 4, pp. 358-367, (2012); Thorndike R.M., Studying canonical analysis: comments on Barcikowski and Stevens, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 2, pp. 249-253, (1976); Thorndike R.M., Canonical correlation analysis, Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, pp. 237-263, (2000); Veer-Ramjeawon P., Rowley J., Embedding knowledge management in higher education institutions (HEIs): a comparison between two countries, Studies in Higher Education, 45, 11, pp. 2324-2340, (2019); Watcharadamrongkun S., Predictors and effects of knowledge management in US colleges and schools of pharmacy, (2012); Wiig K.M., Knowledge Management Methods: Practical Approaches to Managing Knowledge, (1993); Yusoff M.Y.M., Mahmood A.K., Jaafar J., Salak K.K.P., A study of KM process and KM enabler in a Malaysian community college, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 13, 1, (2012); Zhou L., Zijlstra T., Lu X., Embracing knowledge management as a new perspective for librarianship, (2017); Babbie E.R., The Practice of Social Research, (2001); Best J.W., Kahn J.V., Research in Education, (2006); Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K., Research Methods in Education, (2007); Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K., Research Methods in Education, (2018); Creswell J.W., Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, (2008); De-Bruin G.P., Lew C.C., Canonical correlation analysis of the career attitudes and strategies inventory and the adult career concerns inventory, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32, 3, pp. 43-48, (2006); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2006); Huck S.W., Reading Statistics and Research, (2012); Lambert Z.V., Durand R.M., Some precautions in using canonical analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 4, pp. 468-475, (1975); Sekaran U., Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, (2003); Regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in universities and colleges and measures for the maintenance of standards in higher education, (2010)","K.P. Paudel; School of Education, Kathmandu University, Hattiban, Lalitpur, Nepal; email: kpaudel.np@gmail.com","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","20595891","","","","English","VINE J. Inform. Knowl. Manag.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85109335972"
"Yin X.; Li F.; Chen J.; Zhai Y.","Yin, Ximing (57210357898); Li, Fei (57845394400); Chen, Jin (54946985800); Zhai, Yuedi (58563411800)","57210357898; 57845394400; 54946985800; 58563411800","Innovating from university–industry collaboration: the mediating role of intellectual capital","2023","Journal of Intellectual Capital","24","6","","1550","1577","27","2","10.1108/JIC-10-2022-0207","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85169839970&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-10-2022-0207&partnerID=40&md5=71c5306ea48896e09a9465a0633b8c58","School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China; Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of China’s Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China","Yin X., School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Li F., School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, Institute of China’s Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Chen J., Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Zhai Y., School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China","Purpose: University–industry (UI) collaboration is essential for knowledge and technology exchange between higher education institutions and industries, enabling enterprises to accelerate innovation. However, few studies have investigated the collaborative innovation mechanism through which UI collaboration can enhance the accumulation of firms' intellectual capital (IC) and how this, in turn, affects their innovation-driven development. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing from the knowledge management and collaborative innovation theory, this research proposes a theoretical framework of the inter-organization relationship between enterprises and universities to investigate the influence mechanism of UI collaboration, including academic engagement and commercialization, on corporate performance as well as the mediating role of IC by employing survey that covers 177 UI collaborations. Findings: Empirical results show that human capital and relational capital fully mediate the relationship between academic engagement UI collaboration and corporate economic performance, while human capital partially mediates the relationship between commercialization UI collaboration and corporate economic performance. Additionally, structural capital and relational capital partially mediate the relationship between academic engagement and corporate innovation performance, while structural capital fully mediates the relationship between commercialization and corporate innovation performance. Originality/value: This study empirically investigates how academic engagement and commercialization impact corporate performance (i.e. innovation dimension or economic dimension). It uncovers this relationship's underlying mechanism by documenting the IC's mediating impact. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Economic performance; Innovation performance; Intellectual capital; University-industry collaboration","","","","","","Zhejiang Soft Science Program, (2020C25028); Zhejiang Office of Philosophy and Social Science, (21NDJC032YB); National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC, (72104027); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, (2021M690388)","This research is supported by the China National Natural Science Foundation (No. 72104027), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M690388), the Zhejiang Soft Science Program (No. 2020C25028) and Zhejiang Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (No: 21NDJC032YB). The authors are also grateful for meaningful feedback from Zhaohui Zhu, Yang Liu, Jia Wei and Ziyan Xu. Of course, responsibility for the text lies sole with the authors.","Albats E., Alexander A.T., Cunningham J.A., Traditional, virtual, and digital intermediaries in university-industry collaboration: exploring institutional logics and bounded rationality, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, (2022); Ar I.M., Temel S., Dabic M., Howells J., Mert A., Baris Yesilay R., The role of supporting factors on patenting activities in emerging entrepreneurial universities, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70, 6, pp. 2293-2304, (2023); Ardito L., D'Angelo V., Petruzzelli A.M., Peruffo E., The role of human capital in the foreign market performance of US SMEs: does owner ethnicity matter?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 7, pp. 24-42, (2021); Armanios D.E., Eesley C.E., Li J., Eisenhardt K.M., How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources, Strategic Management Journal, 38, 7, pp. 1373-1390, (2017); Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Guerrero M., Siegel D.S., Assessing the impact of the UK's research excellence framework on the relationship between university scholarly output and education and regional economic growth, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 21, 3, pp. 394-421, (2022); Bayraktaroglu A.E., Calisir F., Baskak M., Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 406-425, (2019); Belitski M., Aginskaja A., Marozau R., Commercializing university research in transition economies: technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?, Research Policy, 48, 3, pp. 601-615, (2019); Bontis N., Chua Chong Keow W., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Brennan N., Connell B., Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implications, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 3, pp. 206-240, (2000); Cabello-Medina C., Lopez-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrera R., Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 4, pp. 807-828, (2011); Chatterjee S., Chaudhuri R., Thrassou A., Sakka G., Impact of firm's intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms and the moderating effects of age and gender, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 1, pp. 103-126, (2021); Chen J., Yang Y.J., Theoretical basis and connotation of collaborative innovation, Research of Science, 2, pp. 161-164, (2012); Chen M.C., Cheng S.J., Hwang Y., An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 159-176, (2005); Chen J., Yin X., Fu X., McKern B., Beyond catch-up: could China become the global innovation powerhouse? China's innovation progress and challenges from a holistic innovation perspective, Industrial and Corporate Change, 30, 4, pp. 1037-1064, (2021); Clarke M., Seng D., Whiting R.H., Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 4, pp. 505-530, (2011); Curado C., Perceptions of knowledge management and intellectual capital in the banking industry, Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 3, pp. 141-155, (2008); Dabic M., Vlacic B., Guerrero M., Daim T.U., University spin-offs: the past, the present, and the future, Studies in Higher Education, 47, 10, pp. 2007-2021, (2022); Del Baldo M., Giampaoli D., Macrellino M., Bontis N., Intellectual capital’s link with financing opportunities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24, 2, pp. 359-374, (2021); Delgado-Verde M., Martin de Castro G., Navas-Lopez J.E., Amores-Salvado J., Vertical relationships, complementarity and product innovation: An intellectual capital-based view, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 226-235, (2014); Dinc I.S., Politicians and banks: political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 2, pp. 453-479, (2005); Duan Y., Chen Y., Liu S., Wong C.-S., Yang M., Mu C., The moderating effect of leadership empowerment on relational capital and firms' innovation performance in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: evidence from China, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24, 1, pp. 306-336, (2021); Dutt N., Hawn O., Vidal E., Chatterji A., McGahan A., Mitchell W., How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: the case of business incubators in emerging-market countries, Academy of Management Journal, 59, 3, pp. 818-840, (2016); Ferreira A.I., Martinez F.M., Intellectual capital: perceptions of productivity and investment, RAC Curitiba, 15, 2-5, pp. 249-260, (2011); Fu X., McKern B., Chen J., Yin X., Introduction: China's journey to innovation, The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation, (2021); Gates S., Langevin P., Human capital measures, strategy, and performance: HR managers' perceptions, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23, 1, pp. 111-132, (2010); Geisler E., Rubenstein A.H., A review of major issues. Cooperative research and development: the university–industry–government relationship, Industrial Relations Journal, pp. 43-62, (1989); Gerdsri N., Manotungvorapun N., Systemizing the management of university-industry collaboration: assessment and roadmapping, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69, 1, pp. 245-261, (2021); Gibson E., Daim T.U., Dabic M., Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, pp. 181-202, (2019); Grant R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 109-122, (1996); Guerrero M., Herrera F., Urbano D., Does policy enhance collaborative-opportunistic behaviours? Looking into the intellectual capital dynamics of subsidized industry–university partnerships, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 6, pp. 1055-1081, (2021); Hao W.J., Ju X.F., An empirical study on the impact of intellectual capital on high-tech enterprise performance, Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 28, 5, pp. 467-470, (2008); Hayton J.C., Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research, Human Resource Management Review, 15, 1, pp. 21-41, (2005); He Y.B., Theoretical model of collaborative innovation of industry, university and research, Research of Science, 30, 2, pp. 165-174, (2012); Huang H., The measurement of intellectual capital based on open innovation and its impact on innovation performance, (2011); Hussinki H., Ritala P., Vanhala M., Kianto A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 904-922, (2017); Jiang T.Y., The structure and measurement of enterprise intellectual capital, Science and Management of Science and Technology, 5, pp. 170-174, (2009); Jiang T.Y., Wang J.J., Analysis of the relationship between intellectual capital, organizational learning and corporate innovation performance, Scientific Research Management, 4, pp. 44-50, (2009); Johnson W.H., An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5, pp. 562-575, (1999); Kafouros M., Wang C., Piperopoulos P., Zhang M., Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: the role of region-specific institutions, Research Policy, 44, 3, pp. 803-817, (2015); Lai W.H., Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations, Journal of Business Research, 64, 11, pp. 1218-1223, (2011); Lehmann E.E., Menter M., University-industry collaboration and regional wealth, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 6, pp. 1284-1307, (2016); Li Y.P., Research on the effect and path of supplier relationship on corporate financial performance, Accounting Forum, 15, 2, pp. 129-145, (2016); Li F., Chen J., Su Y.-S., Managing the university-industry collaborative innovation in China: the case of Zhejiang NHU Company, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31, 1, pp. 62-82, (2018); Li F., Shao H.Z., Chen J., An empirical study on the impact of university–industry collaboration on enterprise intellectual capital, Research of Science, 35, 2, pp. 282-288+301, (2017); Li S.C., Su J., Lin N., Research on the relationship between performance of university–industry collaboration and control methods and knowledge transfer, Research of Science, 29, 12, pp. 1854-1864, (2011); Li J., Yin X., Shen S., China's science-based innovation and technology transfer in the global context, The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation, pp. 1-29, (2021); Liu H.J., Chen C.M., Corporate organizational capital, strategic forward-looking and corporate performance: an empirical study based on Chinese companies, Management of the World, 5, pp. 83-93, (2007); Liu H., Li Y., Li X.Y., Research on the relationship between relational capital, organization communication and innovation performance, Research of Science, 12, pp. 1912-1919, (2010); Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U., Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy, 27, 8, pp. 835-851, (1998); Mueller P., Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp. 1499-1508, (2006); Ngah R., Ibrahim A.R., The relationship of intellectual capital, innovation and organizational performance: a preliminary study in Malaysian SMEs, International Journal of Management Innovation Systems, 1, 1, pp. 1-14, (2009); O'Dwyer M., Filieri R., O'Malley L., Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48, 3, pp. 900-931, (2022); Perkmann M., Walsh K., University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 4, pp. 259-280, (2007); Perkmann M., Salandra R., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Hughes A., Academic engagement: a review of the literature 2011-2019, Research Policy, 50, 1, pp. 104-114, (2021); Rehman S.U., Ashfaq K., Bresciani S., Giacosa E., Mueller J., Nexus among intellectual capital, Interorganizational Learning, industrial internet of things technology and innovation performance: a resource-based perspective, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24, 2, pp. 509-534, (2021); Rikap C., Becoming an intellectual monopoly by relying on the national innovation system: the State Grid Corporation of China's experience, Research Policy, 51, 4, (2022); Roos J., Exploring the concept of intellectual capital, Long Range Planning, 31, 1, pp. 150-153, (1998); Secundo G., de Beer C., Schutte C.S., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities' competitiveness, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Sheshadri C., Ranjan C., Alkis T., Georgia S., Impact of firm’s intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms and the moderating effects of age and gender, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 1, (2021); Shi X., Wu Y., Fu D., Does university-industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese firms, Economic Modelling, 86, pp. 39-53, (2020); Steinmo M., Rasmussen E., The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: overcoming the experience barrier, Research Policy, 47, 10, pp. 1964-1974, (2018); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Szucs, Florian, Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation. Research policy: a journal devoted to research policy, Research Management and Planning, 47, 7, pp. 1256-1266, (2018); Tian M., Su Y., Yang Z., University–industry collaboration and firm innovation: an empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 5, pp. 1488-1505, (2022); Tijssen R.J., Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp. 1569-1585, (2006); Tootell A., Kyriazis E., Billsberry J., Ambrosini V., Garrett-Jones S., Wallace G., Knowledge creation in complex inter-organizational arrangements: understanding the barriers and enablers of university-industry knowledge creation in science-based cooperation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 25, 4, pp. 743-769, (2020); Wu Y., A comparative study of patent technology transfer in Japanese universities, Chinese Inventions and Patents, 4, pp. 98-103, (2013); Wu X.B., Wei Y., Du J., Analysis of the role of social capital in the enterprise's industry, universities and research collaboration, Research of Science, 22, 6, pp. 630-633, (2004); Xue W., Lei J.F., Yi N., An empirical study on the relationship between relationship capital, organizational learning and R&D alliance performance, China Industrial Economy, 4, 4, pp. 89-97, (2010); Yin X., Yaxin S., Institutional investors and corporate innovation: executive pay and competition as key contingencies, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022, 1, (2022); Zhang F.H., Li S.Q., Research on the relationship between innovation capability and FDI technology spillover and intellectual capital, Shanghai Economic Research, 2, pp. 22-31, (2013); Zhang L., Liu X.M., Who is the winner?—‘Border inspector’ dependence or ‘trust’ and ‘integrated mechanism’—evidence from university–industry collaboration institutions, Research of Science, 29, 5, pp. 756-763, (2011); Zou Y., Zhang X.H., An empirical study on the relationship between enterprise intellectual capital and technological innovation—absorptive capacity serves as the moderating variable, Soft Science, 23, 3, pp. 71-75, (2009); Del Baldo M., Giampaoli D., Macrellino M., Bontis N., Intellectual capital's link with financing opportunities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24, 2, pp. 359-374, (2021)","F. Li; School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; email: lifei@zju.edu.cn","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85169839970"
"Romanov E.V.","Romanov, E.V. (57201057692)","57201057692","The phenomenon of tacit knowledge loss in high school: Causes and consequences: Part I; [ФЕНОМЕН УТРАТЫ НЕЯВНОГО ЗНАНИЯ ВЫСШЕЙ ШКОЛОЙ: ПРИЧИНЫ И ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ Часть I]","2019","Obrazovanie i Nauka","21","4","","60","91","31","8","10.17853/1994-5639-2019-4-60-91","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065769926&doi=10.17853%2f1994-5639-2019-4-60-91&partnerID=40&md5=f52a45f7133b9266e2be312fc764495c","Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation","Romanov E.V., Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation","Introduction. The implementation of the strategic goal of Russia’s entry into one of the five largest economies in the world actualises the research aimed at identifying conditions for improving the quality of human capital, one of which is the creation of an integrated system of training and professional growth of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel. The aim of the present research was to substantiate the statement that the strategy of reforming higher education in Russia leads to the loss of tacit knowledge in higher education as a basis for determining the quality of educational and scientific activities. This process has a negative impact on the formation of the system of training and professional growth of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel (both in content and procedural aspects). Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the research was based on a systematic approach and an inductive method. The following general scientific methods were employed: analytical review of statistical sources and literature on the discussed issues, generalisation and comparison. The method of comparative analysis was used to assess the dynamics of changes in funding standards of universities in Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk regions and the Republic of Dagestan. Results and scientific novelty. The author substantiates the validity of the thesis on the loss of tacit knowledge in higher education, indirect confirmation of which is a significant reduction in the protection of PhD and doctoral theses with a significant decrease in patent activity in universities and activity to generate income from the results of intellectual activity. It is proved that the existing system of normative-per capita financing is the main “tool”, providing the loss of tacit knowledge: the level of a teacher’s workload is increased that it is impossible to carry out research related to the courses, which leads to a decrease in the quality of education. A formula for calculating the number of students, which ensures the performance of the average salary of the teaching staff at a certain number of disciplines per teacher, is proposed. On the example of the direction “Management”, it is shown that even through annual allocation of 25 and 50 budgetary places the teacher of profile disciplines will read not less than 5 disciplines. In the absence of commercial recruitment comparable to the budget and additional sources of funding, the number of teaching staff will be reduced and the number of courses per teacher will increase. The proposals for preservation and reproduction of the personnel potential of state universities, involving the changes in the performance indicators of universities and the development of financial instruments that stimulate their achievement, are formulated. Practical significance. The materials and results of the research paper can be used by education authorities to develop the university strategy in terms of forecasting the volume of reductions in the number of teaching staff and the income that the university should receive to preserve its human resources. © 2019 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University. All rights reserved.","Higher education; Normative per capita financing; Number of disciplines per teacher; Tacit knowledge","","","","","","","","Balatskiy E.V., Syndrome of reforms’ arrhythmia in the higher education, Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 4, 24, pp. 111-140, (2014); Volchik V.V., Oganesyan A.A., Reforming education: The burden of adaptation, Terra Economicus, 15, 4, pp. 136-148, (2017); Romanov E.V., Higher education: Current state and development prospects, Ekonomicheskaja Politika = Economic Policy, 13, 3, pp. 182-205, (2018); Romanov E.V., Threats to the human capacity of regional higher education institutions, Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 14, 1, pp. 95-108, (2018); Kurbatova M.V., Kagan E.S., Significance assessment of the external control effects of lecturers, Zhurnal Institutsionalnykh Issledovaniy = Journal of Institutional Studies, 7, 3, pp. 122-143, (2015); Tarasevich Yu.Yu., Shinyaeva T.S., Criteria for assessment of current condition and development of research studies based on scientometric data analysis, Voprosy Obrazovaniya = Educational Studies, 2, pp. 221-234, (2015); Donetskaya S.S., Tszi T., Contemporary results of the reforming of higher education in China, Vysshee Obrazovanie V Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 27, 12, pp. 79-92, (2018); Volchik V.V., Krivosheeva-Medyantseva D.D., Institutions, technologies and increasing returns, Zhurnal Institutsionalnykh Issledovaniy = Journal of Institutional Studies, 7, 1, pp. 45-58, (2015); Head S., The grim threat to British universities, The New York Review of Books, (2011); Baggaley R., How the RAE is smothering «big idea» books, Times Higher Education Supplement, (2007); Schuster J., Finkelstein M., The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers, (2008); Kurbatova M.V., Donova I.V., Kagan E.S., Assessment of changes of position of teachers of the Russian higher education institutions, Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia, 26, 3, pp. 90-116, (2017); Benneworth P., Hospers G.J., The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global-local pipelines, Environment and Planning, 25, 6, pp. 779-802, (2007); Youtie J., Shapira P., Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development, Research Policy, 37, 8, pp. 1188-1204, (2008); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The dynamics of innovations: From National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university – Industry – Government relations, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123, (2000); Cervantes M., Higher education institutions in the knowledge triangle, Foresight and STI Governance, 11, 2, pp. 27-42, (2017); Acs Z.J., Anselin L., Varga A., Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy, 31, 7, pp. 1069-1085, (2002); Volchik V.V., Maslyukova E.V., The Metrics trap or why implicit knowledge is underestimated when regulation of science and education is handled, Zhurnal Institutsionalnykh Issledovaniy = Journal of Institutional Studies, 10, 3, pp. 158-179, (2018); Singha A., Soltani E., Knowledge management practices in Indian information technology Companies, Total Quality Management, 21, 2, pp. 145-157, (2010); Dresvyannikov V.A., Postroenie Sistemy Upravleniya Znaniyami Na Predpriyatii = Building A Knowledge Management System in the Enterprise, (2006); Olejnik C.F., Wissensmanagement, MEMOSYS-Centrum Fur Systemische Erwachsenenpadagogik, (2010); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., Kompaniya – Sozdatel’ znaniya. Zarozhdenie i razvitie innovacij v yaponskih firmah, How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, (2011); Cazes B., Indicative planning in France, Journal of Comparative Economics, 14, 4, pp. 607-620, (1990); Sato K., Indicative planning in Japan, Journal of Comparative Economics, 14, 4, pp. 625-647, (1990); Nelson R., Phelps E., Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth, American Economic Review, 56, 1-2, pp. 69-75, (1966); Balatskiy E.V., Yurevich M.A., Modelirovanie struktury nauchnyh kad-rov = Modeling of S&T personnel structure, Terra Economicus, 16, 3, pp. 60-76, (2018); Vershinina S., Tarasova O., Strielkowski W., Academic publishing, journal rankings, and scientific productivity, Terra Economicus, 15, 4, pp. 127-135, (2017)","Е.V. Romanov; Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation; email: evgenij.romanov.1966@mail.ru","","Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University","","","","","","19945639","","","","Russian","Obraz. Nauka","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85065769926"
"Stevanović T.; Ivanović-đukić M.; Rađenović T.; Radović O.","Stevanović, Tatjana (57212716133); Ivanović-đukić, Maja (57190192816); Rađenović, Tamara (58494725200); Radović, Ognjen (55537440000)","57212716133; 57190192816; 58494725200; 55537440000","The impact of national intellectual capital on the economic growth in the south-Eastern European countries; [Utjecaj nacionalnog intelektualnog kapitala na gospodarski rast u zemljama jugoistočne Europe]","2018","Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci / Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics","36","2","","777","800","23","7","10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.777","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059275544&doi=10.18045%2fzbefri.2018.2.777&partnerID=40&md5=a7e3892fd84420c36d3395a6ee1ac098","University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, Niš, 18000, Serbia","Stevanović T., University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, Niš, 18000, Serbia; Ivanović-đukić M., University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, Niš, 18000, Serbia; Rađenović T., University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, Niš, 18000, Serbia; Radović O., University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, Niš, 18000, Serbia","In the contemporary circumstances, intellectual capital has become the engine of the economic, social and cultural development. Mobilization and utilization of intellectual resources in enterprises create value, thus transforming and accelerating development of national economies towards the knowledge and innovation based economies. Due to these reasons, the most developed economies increase investments in education, information technologies and stimulate innovativeness. On the other hand, less developed countries do not have possibilities for significant investments in creating and employing national intellectual potential. This is reflected in their economic growth rates, as in the case of the Southeastern European (SEE) countries. In that regard, the paper investigates the impact of education, information technologies and innovations, as determinants of national intellectual capital development, on the economic growth in the SEE countries. The aim of this paper is to identify the contribution of the key intellectual capital determinants to the economic growth and development in the SEE countries and propose measures whose implementation lead to further development towards knowledge and innovation economies. The results of correlation analysis revealed positive and statistically significant correlation between GDP per capita and employed measures of national intellectual capital. The research has shown that increase in high-technology export, number of R&D researchers and mobile phone subscribers has a positive and significant impact on economic growth. The authors advise intensified cooperation between business community and institutes and universities to achieve synergetic effects in generating and utilising national intellectual potential. © 2019, UNIVRIJEKA. All rights reserved.","Economic growth; Information technology; Innovation; Intellectual capital; Performance measurement","","","","","","","","Al-Ali N., Comprehensive Intellectual Capital Management: Step-By-Step, (2003); An Y., Reporting of Intellectual Capital Information: Evidence from a Developing Country, (2015); Baldacci E., Et al., Social Spending, Human Capital, and Growth in Developing Countries, World Development, 36, 8, pp. 1317-1341, (2008); Bayarcelik E.B., Tasel F., Research and Development: Source of Economic Growth, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, pp. 744-753, (2012); Bokana K.G., Akinola G.W., Productivity effects of higher education human capital in selected countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 35, 1, pp. 173-198, (2017); Bontis N., Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that Develops Measures and Models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., National Intellectual Capital: A United Nations Initiative for the Arab Region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 1, pp. 13-39, (2004); Bounfour A., The Management of Intangibles, (2003); Bradley K., Intellectual Capital and the New Wealth of Nations, Business Strategy Review, 8, 1, pp. 53-62, (1997); Bradley K., Intellectual Capital and the New Wealth of Nations II, Business Strategy Review, 8, 4, pp. 33-44, (1997); Brooking A., Intellectual Capital: Core Assets for the Third Millennium Enterprise, (1998); Chen D., Dahlman C., The Knowledge Economy, the KAM Methodology and World Bank Operations, (2006); Choi Y.-C., Lee J.-H., What Most Matters in Strengthening Educational Competitiveness?: An Application of FS/QCA Method, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp. 2182-2190, (2015); Cohen D., Soto M., Growth and Human Capital: Good Data, Good Results, Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 1, pp. 51-76, (2007); Dorinela N., The Knowledge Assessment Methodology of Countries, Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 15, 2, pp. 156-159, (2015); Dragonescu M.R., Education as a Determinant of the Economic Growth. The Case of Romania, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp. 404-412, (2015); Ercis A., Unalan M., Innovation: A comparative case study of Turkey and South Korea, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp. 701-708, (2016); Falk M., High-tech exports and economic growth in industrialized countries, Applied Economics Letters, 16, 10, pp. 1025-1028, (2009); Franco C., Henrique de Oliveira R., Inputs and outputs of innovation: Analysis of the BRICS: Theme 6 – innovation technology and competitiveness, Revista De Administração E Inovação, 14, 1, pp. 79-89, (2017); Gujarati D.N., Basic Econometrics, (2004); Gupta V., SPSS for Beginners, (1999); Hervas-Oliver J.L., Dalmau-Porta J.I., Which IC Components Explain National IC Stocks?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 3, pp. 444-469, (2007); Jankowska B., Matysek-Jedrych A., Mroczek-Dabrowska K., Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index, Comparative Economic Research, 20, 3, pp. 77-94, (2017); Jovicic M., Dragutinovic Mitrovic R., Ekonometrijski Metodi I Modeli, Beograd: Univerzitet U Beogradu, Ekonomski Fakultet, (2011); Kapyla J., Kujansivu P., Lonnqvist A., National Intellectual Capital Performance: A Strategic Approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 3, pp. 343-362, (2012); Kostoska O., Hristoski I., ICTs and innovation for competitiveness: Evidence for Western Balkans vis-à-vis the European Union, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 35, 2, pp. 487-518, (2017); Kotnik P., Hagsten E., ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 36, 1, pp. 103-128, (2018); Kovacevic R., Current Account determinants in Southeast European (SEE) countries – panel approach, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 35, 2, pp. 391-424, (2017); Krstic B., Upravljanje Intelektualnim Kapitalom preduzeća, (2014); Lin C.Y.-Y., Edvinsson L., National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic countries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 4, pp. 525-545, (2008); Lin C.Y.-Y., Edvinsson L., National Intellectual Capital in Israel and Financial Crisis Impact, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 4, 3, pp. 245-273, (2013); Lucas R.E., On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1, pp. 3-42, (1988); Majeed M.T., Ayub T., Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Economic Growth Nexus: A Comparative Global Analysis, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12, 2, pp. 443-476, (2018); Mehrara M., Seijani S., Karsalari A., Determinants of high-tech export in developing countries based on Bayesian model averaging, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 35, 1, pp. 199-215, (2017); Mercan M., Sezer S., The Effect of Education Expenditure on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, pp. 925-930, (2014); Neycheva M., Does Public Expenditure on Education Matter for Growth in Europe? A Comparison between Old EU Member States and Post-Communist Economies, Post-Communist Economies, 22, 2, pp. 141-164, (2010); Pelinescu E., The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth, Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, pp. 184-190, (2015); Pilinkiene V., R&D investment and competitiveness in the Baltic States, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 154-160, (2015); Plummer P., Tonts M., Martinus K., Endogenous Growth, Local Competitiveness and Regional Development: Western Australia’s Regional Cities, 2001-2011, Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 16, 1, pp. 1-29, (2014); Radosevic S., Research and Development, Competitiveness and European Integration of South Eastern Europe, Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 4, pp. 621-650, (2015); Romer P.M., Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 5, pp. 1002-1037, (1986); Sekuloska J.D., Higher Education and Training as Crucial Pillars in Creating the Competitiveness of Nation, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, pp. 241-246, (2014); Seleim A., Bontis N., National Intellectual Capital and Economic Performance: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries, Knowledge and Process Management, 20, 3, pp. 131-140, (2013); Sherwood R., Intellectual Property Systems and Investment Stimulation, IDEA: The Journal of Law & Technology, 37, 2, pp. 261-370, (1997); South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, (2018); Stahle P., Stahle S., Intellectual Capital and National competitiveness: Conceptual and methodological challenges, Capital Immateriel, Connaisance Et Performance, pp. 415-430, (2006); Stahle P., Stahle S., Lin C.Y.Y., Intangibles and national economic wealth – a new perspective on how they are linked, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 20-57, (2015); Stewart T.A., The Wealth of Knowledge-Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-First Century Organization, (2001); Suri T., Et al., Paths to Success: The Relationship between Human Development and Economic Growth, World Development, 39, 4, pp. 506-522, (2011); Uziene L., National Intellectual Capital as an Indicator of the Wealth of Nations: The Case of the Baltic States, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, pp. 376-381, (2014); Viedma Marti J.M., Cabrita M.R., Entrepreneurial Excellence in the Knowledge Economy: Intellectual Capital Benchmarking Systems, (2012); Weziak D., Measurement of National Intellectual Capital: Application to EU Countries, (2007); Zwolak J., Innovative undertakings in the Polish industry, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci: časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju I Praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 34, 1, pp. 147-160, (2016)","","","University of Rijeka","","","","","","13318004","","","","English","Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85059275544"
"Bellucci M.; Marzi G.; Orlando B.; Ciampi F.","Bellucci, Marco (55022333200); Marzi, Giacomo (57188549922); Orlando, Beatrice (57189332126); Ciampi, Francesco (55521025000)","55022333200; 57188549922; 57189332126; 55521025000","Journal of Intellectual Capital: a review of emerging themes and future trends","2021","Journal of Intellectual Capital","22","4","","744","767","23","59","10.1108/JIC-10-2019-0239","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85088134731&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-10-2019-0239&partnerID=40&md5=479f9ab1f895168bf15a250aca0a1eca","University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy","Bellucci M., University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Marzi G., Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom; Orlando B., University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; Ciampi F., University of Florence, Florence, Italy","Purpose: This article aims to provide a bibliometric and systematic literature analysis of studies published in the Journal of Intellectual Capital (JIC) from 2014 to 2018 in order to highlight emerging themes and future trends. Design/methodology/approach: The analysis focused on 187 papers published on JIC over a period of five years. A scientometric approach to data mining enabled the detection of patterns in the dataset. Precisely, the investigation was conducted by integrating a bibliometric analysis on VOSviewer with a systematic literature review. Findings: Four main streams of research on JIC emerged in the years of the analysis: reporting and disclosure of intellectual capital; intellectual capital research in universities, education and public sector; knowledge management; intellectual capital, financial performance, and market value. Research limitations/implications: The study offers valid insights to the topics covered by the Journal of Intellectual Capital by identifying the main research gaps and trends, along with future research avenues. Originality/value: Prior scholars mostly focused on systematic literature reviews, whilst the use of bibliometric methods generally seems to be a missing tile in the research domain. Also, none of the extant studies has focused on the Journal of Intellectual Capital with reference to the 2014–2018 period. The use of both bibliometric and systematic approaches to literature review delivered extremely fine-tuned results in terms of factors such as citations, contents and evolution of clusters over time. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Bibliographic coupling; Bibliometric analysis; Intellectual capital; Intellectual capital reporting; Knowledge management; Systematic literature review; VOSviewer","","","","","","","","Abhayawansa S.A., A review of guidelines and frameworks on external reporting of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 100-141, (2014); Andriessen D., Making Sense of Intellectual Capital: Designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles, (2004); Anifowose M., Abdul Rashid H.M., Annuar H.A., Ibrahim H., Intellectual capital efficiency and corporate book value: evidence from Nigerian economy, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 3, pp. 644-668, (2018); Argyris C., On Organizational Learning, (1992); Bini L., Dainelli F., Giunta F., Business model disclosure in the Strategic Report: entangling intellectual capital in value creation process, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 83-102, (2016); Birnberg J.G., Shields M.D., Young S.M., The case for multiple methods in empirical management accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting), Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2, 1, pp. 33-66, (1990); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bryman A., Bell E., Business Research Methods, (2015); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Calza F., Dezi L., Schiavone F., Simoni M., The intellectual capital of business incubators, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, pp. 597-610, (2014); Campanella F., Peruta M.R.D., Del Giudice M., Creating conditions for innovative performance of science parks in Europe. How manage the intellectual capital for converting knowledge into organizational action, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, pp. 576-596, (2014); Caputo A., Marzi G., Pellegrini M.M., Rialti R., Conflict management in family businesses: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review, International Journal of Conflict Management, 29, 4, pp. 519-542, (2018); Caputo A., Marzi G., Maley J., Silic M., Ten years of conflict management research 2007-2017: an update on themes, concepts and relationships, International Journal of Conflict Management, 30, 1, pp. 87-110, (2019); Cepeda-Carrion G., Cegarra-Navarro J.G., Cillo V., Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management, 23, 1, pp. 67-89, (2019); Davenport T., Human Capital, (1999); Day W., Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods [book review], Qualitative Research Journal, 7, (2007); de Silva T.-A., Stratford M., Clark M., Intellectual capital reporting: a longitudinal study of New Zealand companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 157-172, (2014); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Involuntary disclosure of intellectual capital: is it relevant?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 29-44, (2017); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dzenopoljac V., Janosevic S., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and financial performance in the Serbian ICT industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 373-396, (2016); Dzenopoljac V., Yaacoub C., Elkanj N., Bontis N., Impact of intellectual capital on corporate performance: evidence from the Arab region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 884-903, (2017); Farooq O., Nielsen C., Improving the information environment for analysts: which intellectual capital disclosures matter the most?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 142-156, (2014); Feng T., Cummings L., Tweedie D., Exploring integrated thinking in integrated reporting – an exploratory study in Australia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 330-353, (2017); Fisher N.I., van Zwet W.R., An interview with Jae C. Lee, International Statistical Review, 83, 3, pp. 371-404, (2015); Galbraith J.K., The New Industrial State, (1969); Heck J.L., Bremser W.G., Six decades of the accounting review: a summary of author and institutional contributors, The Accounting Review, 61, 4, pp. 735-744, (1986); Hussinki H., Ritala P., Vanhala M., Kianto A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 904-922, (2017); Inkinen H., Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 518-565, (2015); Jordao R.V.D., Novas J.C., Knowledge management and intellectual capital in networks of small- and medium-sized enterprises, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 667-692, (2017); Khalique M., Bontis N., Bin Shaari J.A.N., Isa A.H.M., Intellectual capital in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 224-238, (2015); Kianto A., Ritala P., Spender J.-C., Vanhala M., The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 362-375, (2014); Kim S.H., Taylor D., Intellectual capital vs the book-value of assets: a value-relevance comparison based on productivity measures, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 65-82, (2014); Kogut B., Zander U., What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning, Organization Science, 7, 5, pp. 502-518, (1996); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Mariano S., Walter C., The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: content and text analyses, Journal of Knowledge Management, 19, 2, pp. 372-400, (2015); Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., Human capital loss in an academic performance measurement system, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 53-70, (2018); Marzi G., Rialti R., Dabic M., Caputo A., A mixed methods bibliometric investigation of the world review of entrepreneurship, management and sustainable development: from qualitative to quantitative data, World Review of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development, 14, 6, pp. 764-786, (2018); Marzi G., Caputo A., Garces E., Dabic M., A three decade mixed-method bibliometric investigation of the IEEE Transactions on engineering management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67, 1, pp. 4-17, (2020); Melloni G., Intellectual capital disclosure in integrated reporting: an impression management analysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 661-680, (2015); Molodchik M.A., Shakina E.A., Barajas A., Metrics for the elements of intellectual capital in an economy driven by knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 2, pp. 206-226, (2014); Morariu C.M., Intellectual capital performance in the case of Romanian public companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 392-410, (2014); Nahai F., Bernard E.S., 20th anniversary interview with ASJ editor-in-chief Dr Foad Nahai, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36, 1, pp. 119-121, (2015); Natalicchio A., Petruzzelli A.M., Garavelli A.C., A literature review on markets for ideas: emerging characteristics and unanswered questions, Technovation, 34, 2, pp. 65-76, (2014); Natalicchio A., Ardito L., Savino T., Albino V., Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: a systematic literature review, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 6, pp. 1362-1383, (2017); Nelson R.R., Winter S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, (1982); Nimtrakoon S., The relationship between intellectual capital, firms' market value and financial performance: empirical evidence from the ASEAN, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 587-618, (2015); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., Intellectual capital and performance: taxonomy of components and multi-dimensional analysis axes, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 2, pp. 407-452, (2018); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Porter M.E., Millar V.A., How information gives you competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review, 63, 4, pp. 149-160, (1985); Ramadan B.M., Dahiyat S.E., Bontis N., Al-dalahmeh M.A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 437-462, (2017); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Reich R.B., The Work of Nations, (1991); Roos G., Knowledge management, intellectual capital, structural holes, economic complexity and national prosperity, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 745-770, (2017); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Sardo F., Serrasqueiro Z., A European empirical study of the relationship between firms' intellectual capital, financial performance and market value, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 771-788, (2017); Schaper S., Nielsen C., Roslender R., Moving from irrelevant intellectual capital (IC) reporting to value-relevant IC disclosures: key learning points from the Danish experience, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 81-101, (2017); Schmidt-Radde R., Interview with the editor, ChemPlusChem, 81, 1, pp. 3-6, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Senge P.M., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, (1990); Serenko A., Bontis N., Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings, Knowledge and Process Management, 11, 3, pp. 185-198, (2004); Serenko A., Bontis N., Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 3, pp. 675-692, (2017); Serenko A., Bontis N., Booker L., Sadeddin K., Hardie T., A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008), Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 1, pp. 3-23, (2010); Smart P., Tranfield D., Denyer D., Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, British Journal of Management, 14, 3, pp. 207-222, (2003); Stahle P., Stahle S., Lin C.Y.Y., Intangibles and national economic wealth - a new perspective on how they are linked, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 20-57, (2015); Sullivan P.H., Profiting from intellectual capital, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 2, pp. 132-143, (1999); Swart J., Intellectual capital: disentangling an enigmatic concept, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 2, pp. 136-159, (2006); Tranfield D., Denyer D., Smart P., Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, British Journal of Management, 14, 3, pp. 207-222, (2003); Vatamanescu E.M., Andrei A.G., Dumitriu D.L., Leovaridis C., Harnessing network-based intellectual capital in online academic networks. From the organizational policies and practices towards competitiveness, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20, 3, pp. 594-619, (2016); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); van Dijk A., Hendriks P., Romo-Leroux I., Knowledge sharing and social capital in globally distributed execution, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20, 2, pp. 327-343, (2016); van Eck N.J., Waltman L., Visualizing bibliometric networks, Measuring Scholarly Impact, pp. 285-320, (2014); Veltri S., Silvestri A., The Free State University integrated reporting: a critical consideration, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 443-462, (2015); Vishnu S., Gupta V.K., Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 83-99, (2014); Wang Q., Sharma U., Davey H., Intellectual capital disclosure by Chinese and Indian information technology companies: a comparative analysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 3, pp. 507-529, (2016); Wiig K.M., Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 399-405, (1997); Youndt M.A., Subramaniam M., Snell S.A., Intellectual capital profiles: an examination of investments and returns, Journal of Management Studies, 41, 2, pp. 335-361, (2004); Zinkhan G.M., Leigh T.W., Assessing the quality ranking of the journal of advertising, 1986-1997, Journal of Advertising, 28, 2, pp. 51-70, (1999); Zupic I., Cater T., Bibliometric methods in management and organization, Organizational Research Methods, 18, 3, pp. 429-472, (2015); Ciampi F., Marzi G., Demi S., Faraoni M., The big data-business strategy interconnection: a grand challenge for knowledge management. A review and future perspectives, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 5, pp. 1157-1176, (2020); Marzi G., Ciampi F., Dalli D., Dabic M., New product development during the last ten years: the ongoing debate and future avenues, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (2020); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Pellegrini M.M., Ciampi F., Marzi G., Orlando B., The relationship between knowledge management and leadership: mapping the field and providing future research avenues, Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-print,  ahead-of-print, (2020)","B. Orlando; University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; email: beatrice.orlando.uni@gmail.com","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85088134731"
"Muafi M.; Sulistio J.","Muafi, Muafi (56609265900); Sulistio, Joko (57160471800)","56609265900; 57160471800","A Nexus Between Green Intelectual Capital, Supply Chain Integration, Digital Supply Chain, Supply Chain Agility, and Business Performance","2022","Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management","15","2","","275","295","20","15","10.3926/jiem.3831","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85131057541&doi=10.3926%2fjiem.3831&partnerID=40&md5=36b18436bfd8ae1821b5777475cc9db3","Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia","Muafi M., Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia; Sulistio J., Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia","Purpose: This study aims to examine and analyze the nexus between Green Intellectual Capital (GIC), Supply Chain Integration (SCI), Digital Supply Chain (DSC), Supply Chain Agility (SCA) dan Business Performance (BP). It also aims to examine and analyze the mediating influence of several variables: (a) the mediating role of SCI on the relationship between GIC and BP, (b) the mediating role of DSC on the relationship between GIC and BP dan (c) the mediating role of SCA on the relationship between GIC and BP. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative approach is carried out using a survey to the owners or managers, and owners and managers of courier service SMEs in two provinces, namely East Java and Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY). These two provinces are known to have a courier service SMEs in a large amount because of its population density and large business transaction. The number of respondents analyzed are 183 SMEs. This study uses purposive sampling with certain criteria. The approach of the model is using Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS 23. Findings/major contribution: This study provides the main contribution that green intellectual capital has a positive influence on supply chain integration, digital supply chain, and supply chain agility. It also found that supply chain integration and digital supply chain has an influence on business performance, while supply chain agility does not have a significant positive influence on business performance. Finally, regarding the mediation analysis, this study confirms that supply chain integration, digital supply chain, and supply chain agility each mediates the influence of green intellectual capital on business performance. Research limitations/implications: Selecting respondents using purposive sampling is feared to not be able to generalize the population in the two provinces, namely East Java and DIY. The study also uses a self-administered survey, especially on assessing business performance, thus it is feared that there might be a bias, although it has been compared to similar competitor SMEs. Courier service SMEs also have limitation in implementing digital SC, thus they do not quite understand the questionnaire asked even though the researcher has provided assistance during the research. Managerial implication: Companies need to improve GIC and DSC through various strategies and policies such as training, workshop, and other intellectual development routinely and intensively. It can be done by cooperating with other parties such as universities and the government. This step should be taken in order to achieve harmony in all activities of supply chain management (SCM). Companies should also carry out an effective and efficient learning process for companies to move more agile and dynamic, therefore BP can increase sustainably and not static. Theoretical implication: This study provides a theoretical contribution, especially on the nexus between GIC, SCI, DSC, SCA, and BP. DSC becomes a very interesting strategic aspect when it is implemented to the current era, where all of the business process cannot be separated from digital-based technology. Originality/value: Studies in Asia, moreover in Indonesia, which integrates GIC and associate it with business performance mediated by SCI, DSC, and SCA is still rare. In this era, there is a need of an increase of digital competition in all human resources of courier service SMEs in Indonesia, especially when the SMEs have not had a good SCM system. Digital supply chain requires GIC, and they must be fast and agile to adapt to technology and environmental turbulence. © 2022, OmniaScience. All rights reserved.","Business Performance (BP); Digital Supply Chain (DSC); Green Intelectual Capital (GIC); Supply Chain Agility (SCA); Supply Chain Integration (SCI)","","","","","","Universitas Islam Indonesia, UII, (003/DirDPPM/70/Pen.Unggulan/XI/2021)","The authors express their gratitude to DPPM Universitas Islam Indonesia, who has funded this research with the scheme of Riset Unggulan of 2021/2022, Batch 2. No: 003/DirDPPM/70/Pen.Unggulan/XI/2021.","Abdallah A.B., Ayoub H.F., Information technology drivers of supply chain agility: implications for market performance, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 31, 4, pp. 547-573, (2020); Adam M., Ibrahim M., Ikramuddin I., Syahputra H., The Role of Digital Marketing Platforms on Supply Chain Management for Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) at Indonesia, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9, 3, pp. 1210-1220, (2020); Ageron B., Bentahar O., Gunasekaran A., Digital supply chain: challenges and future directions, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21, 3, pp. 133-138, (2020); Ahammad M.F., Glaister K.W., Gomes E., Strategic agility and human resource management, Human Resource Management Review, 30, 1, (2020); Al Humdan E., Shi Y., Behnia M., Supply chain agility: a systematic review of definitions, enablers and performance implications, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50, 2, pp. 287-312, (2020); Albort-Morant G., Leal-Millan A., Cepeda-Carrion G., The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities, Journal of Business Research, 69, 11, pp. 4912-4917, (2016); Alzoubi H., Yanamandra R., Investigating the mediating role of information sharing strategy on agile supply chain, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8, 2, pp. 273-284, (2020); Arqawi S., Zaid A.A., Jaaron A.A.M., Al-hila A.A., Al-Shobaki M.J., Abu-Naser S.S., Green Human Resource Management Practices Among Palestinian Manufacturing Firms-An Exploratory Study, Journal of Resources Development and Management, 52, pp. 62-29, (2019); Ataseven C., Nair A., Ferguson M., An examination of the relationship between intellectual capital and supply chain integration in humanitarian aid organizations: a survey‐based investigation of food banks, Decision Sciences, 49, 5, pp. 827-862, (2018); Attaran M., Digital technology enablers and their implications for supply chain management, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21, 3, pp. 158-172, (2020); Ayuni Q., Muafi, Pengaruh Green Intellectual Capital Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Dengan Pemediasi Green Human Resource Management, Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implementasi, 11, 2, pp. 81-97, (2020); Azka R.M., Puspa A.W., Wibawa H., Siasat Bisnis Kurir Paket Meraup Untung, (2020); Bansal P., Roth K., Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness, Academy of management journal, 43, 4, pp. 717-736, (2000); Benzidia S., Makaoui N., Improving SMEs performance through supply chain flexibility and market agility: IT orchestration perspective, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21, 3, pp. 173-184, (2020); Bontis N., Ciambotti M., Palazzi F., Sgro F., IC and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises, Journal of IC, 19, 4, pp. 712-731, (2018); Buyukozkan G., Gocer F., Digital supply chain: literature review and a proposed framework for future research, Computers in Industry, 97, pp. 157-177, (2018); Chalal H., Bakshi P., Effect of intellectual capital on competitive advantage and business performance: a role of innovation and learning culture, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 51-70, (2014); Chan A.T., Ngai E.W., Moon K.K., The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry, European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 2, pp. 486-499, (2017); Chen C.J., Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage, Management Decision, 57, 7, pp. 1511-1534, (2019); Chen M., Liu H., Wei S., Gu J., Top managers’ managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: A social capital perspective, Industrial Marketing Management, 74, pp. 205-214, (2018); Chen Y.S., The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms, Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 3, pp. 271-286, (2008); Christian F., 2020, Potensi Pertumbuhan Bisnis Logistik Lebih dari 30%, (2019); Claudio D., Cosgriff V., Nino V., Valladares L., An agile standardized work procedure for cleaning the operating room, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14, 4, pp. 701-717, (2021); Cooper R.B., Zmud R.W., Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach, Management Science, 36, pp. 123-139, (1990); Creelman D., Big Idea: Tim Giehll on Human Capital Supply Chains, Creelman Research, 3, 1, pp. 1-3, (2010); DeLone W.H., McLean E.R., The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, pp. 9-30, (2003); Dubey R., Altay N., Gunasekaran A., Blome C., Papadopoulos T., Childe S.J., Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38, 1, pp. 28-48, (2018); Dubey R., Gunasekaran A., Papadopoulos T., Green supply chain management: theoretical framework and further research directions, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24, 1, pp. 184-218, (2017); Dwipayana A., UMKM Harus Dapat Akses Teknologi dan Ekonomi Digital, (2016); Farahani P., Meier C., Wilke J., Digital supply chain management agenda for the automotive supplier industry, Shaping the digital Enterprise, pp. 157-172, (2017); Fayezi S., Zutshi A., O'Loughlin A., Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: a structured literature review, International journal of management reviews, 19, 4, pp. 379-407, (2017); Fernandez E., Junquera B., Ordiz M., Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 4, pp. 634-656, (2003); Fitri A.N., Survei: Di masa pandemi, 85,2% masyarakat gunakan jasa kurir untuk pengiriman barang, (2020); Flynn D., van Schaik P., van Wersch A., A Comparison of Multi-Item Likert and Visual Analogue Scales for the Assessment of Transactionally Defined Coping Function, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 1, pp. 49-58, (2004); Flynn B.B., Huo B., Zhao X., The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach, Journal of Operations Management, 28, pp. 58-71, (2010); Fornell C., Larcher D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, pp. 186-192, (1981); Gimenez C., Ventura E., Supply Chain Management as a Competitive Advantage in the Spanish Grocery Sector, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14, 1, pp. 77-88, (2003); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2010); Haq M.Z.U., Gu M., Huo B., Enhancing supply chain learning and innovation performance through human resource management, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36, 3, pp. 552-568, (2020); Hendijani R., Saei R.S., Supply chain integration and firm performance: the moderating role of demand uncertainty, Cogent Business & Management, 7, 1, (2020); Hohenstein N.O., Feisel E., Hartmann E., Human resource management issues in supply chain management research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44, 6, pp. 434-463, (2014); Huang C.L., Kung F.H., Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry, Management Decision, 49, 9, pp. 1405-1425, (2011); Huo B., Han Z., Chen H., Zhao X., The effect of high-involvement human resource management practices on supply chain integration, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45, 8, pp. 716-746, (2015); Huo B., Ye Y., Zhao X., Shou Y., The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 178, pp. 132-143, (2016); Jabbour C.J.C., de Sousa-Jabbour A.B.L., Govindan K., Teixeira A.A., Freitas W.R., Environmental management and operational performance in automotive companies in Brazil: The role of human resource management and lean manufacturing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, pp. 129-140, (2013); Jabbour C.J.C., Environmental training in organisations: From a literature review to a framework for future research, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 74, pp. 144-155, (2013); Jabbour C.J.C., de Sousa-Jabbour A.B.L., Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 1824-1833, (2016); Jabbour C.J.C., Santos A.C.F., Relationships between human resource dimensions and environmental management in companies: proposal of a model, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, pp. 51-58, (2008); Jabbour C.J.C., Santos F.C.A., Nagano M.S., Contributions of HRM throughout the stages of environmental management: methodological triangulation applied to companies in Brazil, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 7, pp. 1049-1089, (2010); Jacobs M.A., Yu W., Chavez R., The effect of internal communication and employee satisfaction on supply chain integration, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp. 60-70, (2016); Kamble S.S., Gunasekaran A., Gawankar S.A., Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications, International Journal of Production Economics, 219, pp. 179-194, (2020); Kumar S., Managing human capital supply chain in the Internet era, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103, 4, pp. 227-237, (2003); Lau H.C., Lee W., On a Responsive Supply Chain Information System, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30, 7, pp. 598-610, (2000); Lee H.L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S., Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect, Management Science, 43, 4, pp. 546-558, (1997); Li N., The impact of supply chain integration on operation performance: The moderating role of IT competence, Management Science and Engineering, 9, 4, pp. 40-45, (2015); Li S., Ragu-Nathan B., Ragu-Nathan T., Rao S.S., The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance, Omega, 34, 2, pp. 107-124, (2006); Mandip G., Green HRM: People Management Commitment to Environmental Sustainability, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1, pp. 244-252, (2012); Martin-Rubio I., Challenges in Green Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management in Sustainability and Industry 4.0, Knowledge Management for Corporate Social Responsibility, (2021); Martin-Rubio I., Tarquis A.M., Andina D., Business intelligence: New products development and supply chain systems in a SoSE perspective’, World Automation Congress (WAC) (1–5), (2016); Muafi, Kusumawati R., A nexus between green HRM (GHRM), supply chain performance (SCP) and business performance (BP): The mediating role of supply chain organizational learning (SCOL), Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14, 2, pp. 329-344, (2021); Muafi, Uyun Q., The Effect Of Green HRM (GHRM) on Business Sustainability: Mediation Role of Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB), Quality Access to Succcess, 22, 183, pp. 163-170, (2021); Muafi, Siswanti Y., Diharto A.K., Salsabil I., Innovation Culture and Process in Mediating Human Capital Supply Chain on Firm Performance, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7, 9, pp. 593-602, (2020); Mubarik M.S., Bontis N., Mubarik M., Mahmood T., Intellectual capital and supply chain resilience, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2021); Mwita K.M., Conceptual Review of Green Human Resource Managament Practices, East African Journal of Social and Applied Sciences (EAJ-SAS), 1, 2, pp. 13-20, (2019); Nasiri M., Ukko J., Saunila M., Rantala T., Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies, Technovation, pp. 96-97, (2020); Olaore R.A., Adebisi N.T., Accounting, purchasing and supply chain management interface, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 11, 2, pp. 80-84, (2013); Petersen H.L., Lemke F., Mitigating reputational risks in supply chains, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20, 5, pp. 495-510, (2015); Pinzone M., Guerci M., Lettieri E., Redman T., Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: the role of ‘Green’ HRM, Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, pp. 201-211, (2016); Pirogova O., Plotnikov V., Makarov I., Grafov A., The impact of digitalization on the Intellectual capital formation and use (case of service enterprises), Proceeding E3S Web of Conferences, 217, (2020); Prakash A., Jha S.K., Prasad K.D., Singh A.K., Productivity, quality and business performance: an empirical study, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66, 1, pp. 78-91, (2017); Qin Z., A Literature Review of the Impact of Green Supply Chain Management on Firm Performance, Journal of Service Science and Management, 12, 7, pp. 872-879, (2019); Rasyidi R.A., Kusumastuti R.D., Supply chain agility assessment of an Indonesian humanitarian organization, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 10, 4, pp. 629-652, (2020); Rohilla J., An Innovative Approach of Green Human Resource Management: Practices in the Organization, Global Journal for Research Analysis, 6, 6, pp. 174-176, (2017); Sandoval V.P., Torres-Guevara L.E., Ormazabal M., Jaca C., Beyond the circular economy theory: Implementation methodology for industrial SMEs, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14, 3, pp. 425-438, (2021); Santhoshraj E.D., Green HRM in preserving intellectual capital, International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 2, 5, pp. 690-692, (2017); Saryatmo M.A., Sukhotu V., The Influence of the Digital Supply Chain on Operational Performance: A Study of the Food and Beverage Industry in Indonesia, Sustainability, 13, 9, (2021); Schniederjans D.G., Curado C., Khalajhedayati M., Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management, International Journal of Production Economics, 220, (2020); Shakil R.M., Mollah A., Rahman S.T., Habib M., A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Human Resources Management and Supply Chain Management, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9, 4, pp. 173-184, (2020); Shou Y., Hu W., Xu Y., Exploring the role of intellectual capital in supply chain intelligence integration, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118, 5, pp. 1018-1032, (2018); Siriyanun S., Mukem A., Jermsittiparsert K., Bridging Workplace Democracy and Supply Chain Integration through High Involvement of Human Resource Practices, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8, 5, pp. 685-696, (2019); Soh C., Markus M.L., How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 29-41, (1995); Song S., Shi X., Song G., Supply chain integration in omni-channel retailing: a human resource management perspective, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50, 1, pp. 101-121, (2019); Strohmeier S., Digital human resource management: A conceptual clarification, German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34, 3, pp. 345-365, (2020); Sundram V.P.K., Chhetri P., Bahrin A.S., The consequences of information technology, information sharing and supply chain integration, towards supply chain performance and firm performance, Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 18, 1, pp. 15-31, (2020); Tian H., Otchere S.K., Coffie C.P., Mensah I.A., Baku R.K., Supply Chain Integration, Interfirm Value Co-Creation and Firm Performance Nexus in Ghanaian SMEs: Mediating Roles of Stakeholder Pressure and Innovation Capability, Sustainability, 13, 4, (2021); Ullah H., Wang Z., Bashir S., Khan A.R., Riaz M., Syed N., Nexus between IT capability and green intellectual capital on sustainable businesses: evidence from emerging economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 22, pp. 27825-27843, (2021); Wang Q., Huo B., The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Supply Chain Integration and Competitive Performance, Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, (2018); Wei S., Ke W., Lado A.A., Liu H., Wei K.K., The effects of justice and top management beliefs and participation: an exploratory study in the context of digital supply chain management, Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 1, pp. 51-71, (2020); Wei S., Yin J., Chen X., Paradox of Supply Chain Integration and Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Distributive and Procedural Justice, Decision Sciences, 52, 1, pp. 78-108, (2021); Wiengarten F., Li H., Singh P.J., Fynes B., Re-evaluating supply chain integration and firm performance: linking operations strategy to supply chain strategy, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24, 4, pp. 540-559, (2019); Wiguna I.P.A., Rachmawati F., Rohman M.A., Setyaning L.B., A Framework for Green Supply Chain Management in the Construction Sector: A Case Study in Indonesia, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14, 4, pp. 788-807, (2021); Willis P.G., Genchev S.E., Chen H., Supply chain learning, integration, and flexibility performance: An empirical study in India, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27, 3, pp. 755-769, (2016); Wisner J.D., Tan K.C., Leong G.K., Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach (3th ed.), (2012); Wong C.W.Y., Wong C.Y., Boon-itt S., The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation, International Journal of Production Economics, 146, 2, pp. 566-574, (2013); Wong C.Y., Boon-itt S., Wong C.W.Y., The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 6, pp. 604-615, (2011); Wong L.W., Leong L.Y., Hew J.J., Tan G.W.H., Ooi K.B., Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs, International Journal of Information Management, 52, C, (2020); Yong J.Y., Yusliza M.Y., Ramayah T., Fawehinmi O., Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management, Journal of cleaner production, 215, pp. 364-374, (2019); Yusliza M.Y., Yong J.Y., Tanveer M.I., Ramayah T., Faezah J.N., Muhammad Z., A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, (2020); Yusuf Y., Menhat M.S., Abubakar T., Ogbuke N.J., Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation, International Journal of Production Economics, 222, (2020); Zhang H., Sakurai K., Blockchain for IOT-based digital supply chain: A survey, International Conference on Emerging Internetworking, Data & Web Technologies, pp. 564-573, (2020); Zhang Q., Pan J., Jiang Y., Feng T., The impact of green supplier integration on firm performance: The mediating role of social capital accumulation, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26, 2, (2020); Zhao X., Huo B., Flynn B.B., Yeung J.H.Y., The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain, Journal of Operations Management, 26, 3, pp. 368-388, (2008); Zhou C., Xia W., Feng T., Jiang J., He Q., How environmental orientation influences firm performance: The missing link of green supply chain integration, Sustainable Development, 28, 4, pp. 685-696, (2020)","M. Muafi; Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia; email: muafi@uii.ac.id","","OmniaScience","","","","","","20138423","","","","English","J. Ind. Eng. Manage.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85131057541"
"Tikhonova A.D.","Tikhonova, Anna Dmitrievna (57202493990)","57202493990","The Estimation of the Importance of Universities Performance Assessment for Stakeholders","2018","Economy of Regions","14","2","","536","546","10","4","10.17059/2018-2-16","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048547212&doi=10.17059%2f2018-2-16&partnerID=40&md5=9b3617b4b85bb6b7714859d556ac9e0c","Ural State University of Economics, (82, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation","Tikhonova A.D., Ural State University of Economics, (82, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation","The issue to assess the activity of universities by the various interested parties (stakeholders) is relevant. It is caused by the reforming processes of higher education regarding the transformation of institutions into entities of special type. These entities are able to meet the needs of labour market applying lifelong learning according to the requirements of enterprises to realize the intellectual potential in industries of the country. The research includes the analysis of the existing definitions of the term “education service” and criteria for universities performance assessment used in various ratings. I have conducted a survey, which is based on the collection of data from students, graduates, university entrants, industrial leaders and other potential employers as key stakeholders. The opinion of these stakeholders should be considered by universities when planning a strategy to improve their activity. I wondered whether preferences for characteristics of universities differ for the representatives of various groups of stakeholders or not. The research results have showed that preferences of both the representatives of business and the society, in general, have the same direction, though by a number of criteria they significantly differ. As a result of the analysis, I have developed a model for defining a programme of actions, which increase those performance indicators, which are significant for the main stakeholders of the education market. Therefore, the increase in universities performance finally will contribute to the socio-economic development of regions. The research results can be applied to eliminate a number of controversial issues concerning the requirement for universities to process a strategic potential to address major problems of innovative development of the country. © 2018 Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.","Development of regions; Education service; Higher education; Human capital; Intellectual base; Management of universities; Modernization of economy; Universities; Universities performance assessment of stakeholders","","","","","","","","Enright M., Regional clusters and economic development: A research agenda, Business Networks: Prospects for Regional Development, (1996); Gourinchas P., Rey H., External Adjustment, Global Imbalances, Valuation Effects, NBER Working Paper, (2013); OhUallachain B., Leslie T.F., Rethinking the regional knowledge production function, Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 6, pp. 737-752, (2007); Bochko V.S., Perspektivy razvitiya Srednego Urala v usloviyakh rastushchikh ekonomicheskikh ugroz [Prospects of development of Middle Ural in conditions of growing economic threats, Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 2, pp. 43-53, (2014); Avraamova E.M., Loginov D.M., Rol shkolnogo obrazovaniya v razvitii chelovecheskogo kapitala [Role of school education in development of human capital], Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 2, pp. 53-62, (2014); Grayson J., O'Dell K., Amerikanskiy Menedzhment Na Poroge XXI Veka: Per. S Angl [The American Management on A Threshold of The XXI Century. Trans from English], (1991); Didkovskaya Ya.V., Dinamika strategiy professionalnoy karyery molodezhi v usloviyakh transformatsii mod-eli professionalnogo samoopredeleniya [The career strategy dynamics of youth under the conditions of transformation of the professional self-Identification model], Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta [Ural Federal University Journal], 2, 126, pp. 117-131, (2014); Bobkov V.N., Litvinyuk A.A., Ledneva S.A., Trebovaniya rabotodateley goroda Moskvy k molodym spet-sialistam i problemy ikh podgotovki v uchebnykh zavedeniyakh: Regionalnaya spetsifika [Requirements of employers for young specialists and issues of their training at the educational institutions: Regional specificity of Moscow], Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 12, 4, pp. 1102-1112, (2016); Bourdieu P., Boltanski L., La Production De L’Ideologie Dominante, (2008); Bourdieu P., Esquisse pour Une Auto-Analyse, (2004); Jerrim J., Do UK higher education students overestimate their starting salary?, Fiscal Studies, 32, 4, pp. 483-509, (2011); Jerrim J., Do college students make better predictions of their future income than young adults in the labor force?, Education Economics, 23, 2, pp. 162-179, (2015); Talcot P., Victor M., Readings in Premodern Societies, (1972); Talcott P., On Institutions and Social Evolution: Selected Writings, (1982); Chentsov A., O biznese obrazovatelnykh uslug [About the business of educational services], Vyssheye Obrazovanie V Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2, pp. 120-123, (1999); Strizhov A.M., Ponyatie kachestva obrazovatelnoy uslugi v usloviyakh rynochnykh otnosheniy [Concept of quality of educational service in the conditions of the market relations, Standarty I Monitoring V Obrazovanii [Standards and Monitoring in Education], 3, pp. 47-50, (1999); Dzhaparova R., Marketing uslug professionalnogo obrazovaniya [Services marketing of professional education], Marketing [Marketing], 4, pp. 55-65, (2005); Lipkina E.D., Konkurentosposobnost Vuzov Na Sovremennom Rynke Obrazovatelnykh Uslug [Competitiveness of Higher Education Institutions in Modern Education Market], (2006); Zaychikova S.A., Mayatskaya I.N., Strategiya Marketinga Vysshego Uchebnogo Zavedeniya V Sisteme Otkrytogo Obrazovaniya [Marketing Strategy of A Higher Educational Institution in The System of Open Education], (2006); Tereshchenko N.N., Issledovanie Rynka Obrazovatelnykh Uslug Vysshey Shkoly [Research of The Education Market of Higher Institution], (2005); Zotov V.N., Razrabotka strategii i taktiki marketingovoy deyatelnosti vuzov na rynke obrazovatelnykh uslug i nauchno-tekhnicheskoy produktsii: Avtoref., Disss. … Kand. Ekon. Nauk [Development of The Strategy and Tactics of The Marketing Activity of Higher Education Institutions in Education Market and Scientific and Technical Products, (1997); Son T.A., Formirovanie Rynka Obrazovatelnykh Uslug [Development of Education Market]; Romanova I.B., Upravlenie Konkurentosposobnostyu Vysshego Uchebnogo Zavedeniya [Management of Competitiveness of A Higher Educational Institution], (2005); Shchetinin V.P., Khromenkov N.A., Ryabushkin B.S., Ekonomika Obrazovaniya [Economy of Education], pp. 12-13, (1995); Ratslaf A.A., Sedova A.V., Obrazovatelnaya usluga: Opredelenie i svoystva [Educational service: Definition and properties], Molodoy Uchenyy [Young Scientists], 13, pp. 162-164, (2014); Bochko V.S., Sverdlovskaya oblast v period reform, Tendentsii Preobrazovaniy [The Sverdlovsk Region During Reforms. Tendencies of Transformations], (2006); Animitsa E.G., Silin Ya.P., Sredniy Ural na puti k novoy industrializatsii [Central Ural towards new industrialization, Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 3, pp. 71-81, (2013)","A.D. Tikhonova; Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, (82, 8 Marta St., 620144, Russian Federation; email: yami513@mail.ru","","Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences","","","","","","20726414","","","","Russian","Econ. Reg.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85048547212"
"Fernback J.","Fernback, Jan (57204209691)","57204209691","Academic/digital work: Icts, knowledge capital, and the question of educational quality","2018","TripleC","16","1","","143","158","15","3","10.31269/vol16iss1pp143-158","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041719003&doi=10.31269%2fvol16iss1pp143-158&partnerID=40&md5=b12cd957e28ac396d7aa0801e0d9f04b","Klein College of Media and Communication, Temple University, Philadelphia, United States","Fernback J., Klein College of Media and Communication, Temple University, Philadelphia, United States","The ideology of the information society has transformed the performance of academic duties within higher education through the permeation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) into all aspects of the university. These technologies provide a common ground upon which teaching, research, and administration fuse; but how have such arrangements affected the quality of academic work? This ideology functions through values, hierarchies, rewards and punishments, and surveillance that influence routine work. Using a critical orientation, this paper examines the transformation of the quality of the intellectual products and work processes of higher education in a North American context. It examines how the educational technology industry fosters a type of control over academic workers, inhibiting the individual labourer's pursuit of educational quality. Grounded in Foucault’s concept of “disciplinary power” and in Freire’s notions of critical consciousness, it suggests a community-centred approach toward building knowledge capital in higher education. © 2018, Unified Theory of Information Research Group. All rights reserved.","Academic work; Higher education; ICTs","","","","","","","","Bowles S., Gintis H., Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life, (2011); Harry B., Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in The Twentieth Century, (1974); Cantor N., Courant P.N., Scrounging for Resources: Reflections on the Whys and Wherefores of Higher Education Finance, New Directions for Institutional Research, 119, pp. 3-12, (2003); Cheng M., Quality in Higher Education, (2016); Conceicao S.C.O., Lehman R.M., Faculty Strategies for Balancing Workload When Teaching Online, Presented at the Midwest Research-To-Practice, pp. 26-28, (2010); Foucault M., Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1974-1975, (2003); Foucault M., The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, pp. 281-301, (1997); Foucault M., Power/Knowledge, (1980); Foucault M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of The Prison, (1977); Michel F., Orders of Discourse, Social Science Information, 10, 2, pp. 7-30, (1971); Freire P., Education for Critical Consciousness, (2005); Freire P., The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation, (1985); Nicholas G., Information Society’ as Theory or Ideology: A Critical Perspective on Technology, Education and Employment in the Information Age, Digital Academe: The New Media and Institutions of Higher Education and Learning, Edited by William H. Dutton and Brian D. Loader, pp. 253-267, (2002); Benjamin G., The Fall of The Faculty: The Rise of The All-Administrative University and Why It Matters, (2011); Glen M., The Future of Higher Education: How Technology Will Shape Learning, A report by the Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by the New Media Consortium, (2008); Gruner S.M., Easley D., Giese E., Healey T., Lin H., Lenetsky M., McEuen P., Report of the College of Arts and Sciences Committee on Streamlining Research Administration, (2015); Richard H., On the Abolition of Academic Labour: The Relationship between Intellectual Workers and Mass Intellectuality, Triplec: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12, 2, pp. 822-837, (2014); Richard H., Educational Technology and the Enclosure of Academic Labour inside Public Higher Education, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11, 3, pp. 52-82, (2013); Hamilton E.C., Technology and The Politics of University Reform: The Social Shaping of Online Education, (2016); Larry H., Educational Technology and Academic Labor. The, Radical Teacher, 63, pp. 25-28, (2002); Peter J., Universities and Corporate Universities: The Higher Learning Industry in Global Society, (2001); Massy W.F., Zemsky R., Using Information Technology to Enhance Academic Productivity, (1995); Cameron M., Afterword: The Unmaking of Education in the Age of Globalization, Neoliberalism and Information, Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labor, pp. 301-321, (2011); Noble D., Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education, First Monday, 3, 1, (1998); Peters M.A., Bulut E., Introduction, Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labor, (2011); Heather-Jane R., Toward the Theory of Negativity: Teacher Education and Information and Communication Technology, Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 4, pp. 280-296, (2003); Rubley J.N., Big Data has Arrived: Using Technology to Measure Student Performance, (2016); Marilyn S., Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, (2000); Taylor F.W., The Principles of Scientific Management, (1911); Gaye T., Wannabe U: Inside the Corporate University, (2009); Twigg C., Academic Productivity: The Case for Instructional Software, A Report from the Broadmoor Roundtable, (1996)","J. Fernback; Klein College of Media and Communication, Temple University, Philadelphia, United States; email: fernback@temple.edu","","Unified Theory of Information Research Group","","","","","","1726670X","","","","English","TripleC","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85041719003"
"Rehman W.; Jalil F.; Saltik O.; Degirmen S.; Bekmezci M.","Rehman, Wasim ul (57202442574); Jalil, Faryal (57211576853); Saltik, Omur (57194197907); Degirmen, Suleyman (26653989600); Bekmezci, Mustafa (54388468200)","57202442574; 57211576853; 57194197907; 26653989600; 54388468200","Leveraging Strategic Innovation and Process Capabilities for Intellectual Capital Initiative Performance of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs): A Knowledge-Based Perspective","2023","Journal of the Knowledge Economy","","","","","","","1","10.1007/s13132-023-01336-3","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85151267013&doi=10.1007%2fs13132-023-01336-3&partnerID=40&md5=c894250bee922928d42026f16568bce5","Department of Business Administration, University of the Punjab, Gujranwala Campus, Gujranwala, Pakistan; Institute of Quality &Technology Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; Department of Economics, Konya Food and Agriculture University, Konya, Turkey; Department of Defense Studies, Turkish Military Academy, National Defense University, Istanbul, Turkey","Rehman W., Department of Business Administration, University of the Punjab, Gujranwala Campus, Gujranwala, Pakistan; Jalil F., Institute of Quality &Technology Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; Saltik O., Department of Economics, Konya Food and Agriculture University, Konya, Turkey; Degirmen S., Department of Economics, Konya Food and Agriculture University, Konya, Turkey; Bekmezci M., Department of Defense Studies, Turkish Military Academy, National Defense University, Istanbul, Turkey","This study attempts to investigate the “dynamic IC transformation process” namely “knowledge inputs” → “processors” → “knowledge outputs” (I →P →O) model within the context of higher education institutes (HEIs) in Pakistan. In this knowledge era, HEIs are considered repositories of “knowledge” that are continuously reconfiguring and nurturing themselves with existing knowledge assets. Therefore, this study proposes a “dynamic IC transformation” (I →P →O) model to analyze the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) initiatives as “knowledge inputs” (I), “strategic innovation” and “process capabilities” as “processors” (P), and the performance of HEIs as “knowledge-outputs” (O). To test the model, we conducted a survey (questionnaire) involving 258 usable responses from teaching and non-teaching staff working in public and private HEIs in Pakistan. In this sense, we employed a parallel mediation analysis through process macro to evaluate the indirect effects of “processors” between “knowledge inputs” and “knowledge output.” The study identifies that “knowledge inputs” significantly influence the performance of HEIs in terms of “knowledge output.” However, the explanatory power of human capital as an essential element of IC initiatives is more detrimental than that of structural and relational capital initiatives. Further, results indicate that “processors,” i.e., “strategic innovation” and “process capabilities,” partially mediate the relationship between “knowledge inputs” and “knowledge output.” Thus, this study contributes to ongoing academic debates about how the “dynamic IC transformation model” works in producing “knowledge outputs” by leveraging “strategic innovation” and “process capabilities” of HEIs. Further, this study also offers fruitful implications for academicians that may turn the IC initiatives as “knowledge inputs” into the development of viable opportunities for HEIs as “entrepreneurial” or “stakeholder” universities by valuing their knowledge assets. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.","Intellectual capital initiatives; Performance of higher education institutes; Process capabilities; Strategic innovation","","","","","","","","Abd-Elrahman A.E.H., Kamal J.M.A., Relational capital, service quality and organizational performance in the Egyptian telecommunication sector, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17, 1, pp. 299-324, (2020); Adomaviciute D., University’s role and influence for professional development in public administration area, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 2, pp. 703-719, (2018); Agostini L., Nosella A., Filippini R., Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 400-418, (2017); Ahmad N.H., Halim H.A., Ramayah T., Popa S., Papa A., The ecosystem of entrepreneurial university: the case of higher education in a developing country, International Journal of Technology Management, 78, 1-2, pp. 52-69, (2018); Alpkan L., Bulut C., Gunday G., Ulusoy G., Kilic K., Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance, Management Decision, 48, 5, pp. 732-755, (2010); Alcaniz L., Gomez-Bezares F., Roslender R., Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward, Accounting Forum, 35, 2, pp. 104-117, (2011); Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S., Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 3, pp. 396-402, (1977); Andreeva T., Garanina T., Saenz J., Aramburu N., Kianto A., Does country environment matter in the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation performance?, Journal of Business Research, 136, pp. 263-273, (2021); Arun K., Shekhar V., SCL of knowledge in Indian universities, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 3, pp. 1043-1058, (2020); Aubert J.E., Reiffers J.L., Knowledge economies in the Middle East and North Africa: Toward new development strategies, (2003); Aversano N., Nicolo G., Sannino G., Polcini P.T., The integrated plan in Italian public universities: New patterns in intellectual capital disclosure, Meditari Accountancy Research., 28, 4, pp. 655-679, (2020); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Baima G., Forliano C., Santoro G., Vrontis D., Intellectual capital and business model: A systematic literature review to explore their linkages, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 3, pp. 653-679, (2020); Bhatti S.H., Vorobyev D., Zakariya R., Christofi M., Social capital, knowledge sharing, work meaningfulness and creativity: Evidence from the Pakistani pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 2, pp. 243-259, (2020); Barrena-Martinez J., Cricelli L., Ferrandiz E., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm, Journal of Business Research, 112, pp. 261-270, (2020); Beltramino N.S., Garcia-Perez-de-Lema D., Valdez-Juarez L.E., The structural capital, the innovation and the performance of the industrial SMES, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 913-945, (2020); Benneworth P., Nieth L., The persistent problems of universities’ contributions to regional development, RSA Regions, (2020); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5-8, pp. 433-462, (1999); Bontis N., World Congress on Intellectual Capital Readings, KMCI Butterworth-Heinemann Press., (2002); Bontis N., Intellectual capital disclosure in Canadian corporations, Journal of human resource costing & accounting, 7, 1-2, pp. 9-20, (2003); Bontis N., Keow W.C.C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Bontis N., Crossan M., Hulland J., Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows, Journal of Management Studies, 39, 4, pp. 439-469, (2002); Brennan J., Cochrane A., Universities: In, of, and beyond their cities, Oxford Review of Education, 45, 2, pp. 188-203, (2019); Bucheli V., Diaz A., Calderon J.P., Lemoine P., Valdivia J.A., Villaveces J.L., Zarama R., Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: an intellectual capital-based approach, Scientometrics, 91, 2, pp. 369-382, (2012); Cabrilo S., Kianto A., Milic B., The effect of IC components on innovation performance in Serbian companies, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48, 3, pp. 448-466, (2018); Cabrilo S., Dahms S., How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 3, pp. 621-648, (2018); Cai Y., Liu C., The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems, Science and Public Policy, 42, 1, pp. 15-29, (2015); Canibano L., Garcia-Ayuso M., Sanchez M.P., Accounting for intangibles: A literature review, Journal of Accounting Literature, 19, pp. 102-130, (2000); Canibano M.L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de economía aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-25, (2008); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Measurement, management and reporting on intangibles, State of the art. Accounting and Business Review, 3, 1, pp. 37-62, (2004); Carayannis E.G., Alexander J., Ioannidis A., Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France, Technovation, 20, 9, pp. 477-488, (2000); Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F., Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 3-4, pp. 201-234, (2009); Carayannis E.G., Grigoroudis E., Del Giudice M., Della Peruta M.R., Sindakis S., An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 1, pp. 35-56, (2017); Cardenas I.C., Al-jibouri S.S., Halman J.I., van Tol F.A., Capturing and integrating knowledge for managing risks in tunnel works, Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 33, 1, pp. 92-108, (2013); Casanueva C., Gallego A., Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks, Innovation, 12, 1, pp. 105-117, (2010); Catanzaro A., Messeghem K., Sammut S., Effectiveness of export support programs: Impact on the relational capital and international performance of early internationalizing small businesses, Journal of Small Business Management, 57, pp. 436-461, (2019); Cavagnoli D., A conceptual framework for innovation: An application to human resource management policies in Australia, Innovation, 13, 1, pp. 111-125, (2011); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: A structural modelling perspective from north Indian universities, International Journal of Educational Development, 56, pp. 52-61, (2017); Chen Y., Ma X., Yan P., Wang M., Operating efficiency in Chinese universities: An extended two-stage network DEA approach, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6, 4, pp. 482-498, (2021); Chesbrough H., Lettl C., Ritter T., Value creation and value capture in open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35, 6, pp. 930-938, (2018); Cheng Q., Liu Y., Chang Y., The incentive mechanism in knowledge alliance: Based on the input-output of knowledge, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 2, (2022); Chikazhe L., Makanyeza C., Chigunhah B., Understanding mediators and moderators of the effect of customer satisfaction on loyalty, Cogent Business & Management, 8, 1, (2021); Choo C.W., Bontis N., The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, (2002); Chahal H., Bakshi P., Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: Role of innovation and organizational learning, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33, 3, pp. 376-399, (2015); Clark B.R., Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation, Issues in Higher Education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales, (1998); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Cosma S., Grasso A.G., Pattarin F., Pedrazzoli A., The role of platforms in equity crowdfunding campaigns, ADEIMF Conference Paper, (2019); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Duenas L.P.L., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cronbach L.J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 3, pp. 297-334, (1951); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Dabic M., Vlacic B., Scuotto V., Warkentin M., Two decades of the Journal of Intellectual Capital: A bibliometric overview and an agenda for future research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 3, pp. 458-477, (2020); Dasborough M., Lamb P., Suseno Y., Understanding emotions in higher education change management, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 4, pp. 579-590, (2015); Davidsson P., Honig B., The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs, Journal of business venturing, 18, 3, pp. 301-331, (2003); Day G.S., The capabilities of market-driven organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58, 4, pp. 37-52, (1994); Delgado-Verde M., Martin-de Castro G., Navas-Lopez J.E., Organizational knowledge assets and innovation capability: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms, Journal of intellectual capital, 12, 1, pp. 5-19, (2011); Dezi L., Ferraris A., Papa A., Vrontis D., The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 2, pp. 360-369, (2019); Dierkes M., Antal A.B., Child J., Nonaka I., Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge, (2003); Dumay J.C., Intellectual capital measurement: A critical approach, Journal of intellectual capital, 10, 2, pp. 190-210, (2009); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Drucker P.F., Drucker P.F., Post-capitalist society, (1994); Edvinsson L., Corporate Longitude, (2002); Edvinsson L., IC 21: Reflections from 21 Years of IC Practice and Theory, 14, 1, pp. 163-172, (2013); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual Capital, (1997); Elena S., Knowledge management and intellectual capital in European universities, In Proceedings of the Workshop Organised by the Graduate Programme “Entering the Knowledge Society” and the Institute for Science and Technology Studies., (2004); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations, Research policy, 29, 2, pp. 109-123, (2000); RICARDIS: Reporting intellectual capital to augment research, development and innovation in SMEs: Report to the commission of the high-level expert group on RICARDIS, (2006); Farzaneh M., Wilden R., Afshari L., Mehralian G., Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation, Journal of Business Research, 148, pp. 47-59, (2022); Fazlagic A., París, Francia, Conference on Trends in the Management of Human Resources in Higher Education., pp. 1-9, (2005); Feng H.I., Chen C.S., Wang C.H., Chiang H.C., The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer, The Service Industries Journal, 32, 6, pp. 899-917, (2012); Ferreira J., Mueller J., Papa A., Strategic knowledge management: Theory, practice and future challenges, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 2, pp. 121-126, (2018); Ferreira J., Fernandes C., Resources and capabilities’ effects on firm performance: What are they?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 5, pp. 1202-1217, (2017); Ferraris A., Santoro G., Pellicelli A.C., Openness of public governments in smart cities: Removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 4, pp. 1259-1280, (2020); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, pp. 39-50, (1981); Garde Sanchez R., Rodriguez Bolivar M.P., Lopez Hernandez A.M., Which are the main factors influencing corporate social responsibility information disclosures on universities’ websites, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 2, (2021); Ghiselli E.E., Campbell J.P., Zedeck S., Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences, (1981); Galati A., Crescimanno M., Tinervia S., Iliopoulos C., Theodorakopoulou I., Internal resources as tools to increase the global competition: the Italian wine industry case, British Food Journal, 119, 11, pp. 2406-2420, (2017); Gold A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H., Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1, pp. 185-214, (2001); Gonzalez Millan J.J., Rodriguez Diaz M.T., Models of intellectual capital and indicators in the public university, Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad del Valle), 43, pp. 113-128, (2010); Guerrero M., Herrera F., Urbano D., Strategic knowledge management within subsidised entrepreneurial university-industry partnerships, Management Decision, 57, 12, pp. 3280-3300, (2019); Guerrero M., Herrera F., Urbano D., Does policy enhance collaborative-opportunistic behaviours? Looking into the intellectual capital dynamics of subsidized industry–university partnerships, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 6, pp. 1055-1081, (2021); Hair, Sarstedt M., Hopkins L., Kuppelwieser V.G., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research, European Business Review, 26, 2, pp. 106-121, (2014); Hayes A.F., Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation, Communication Monographs, 85, 1, pp. 4-40, (2018); Hayaeian S., Hesarzadeh R., Abbaszadeh M.R., The impact of knowledge management strategies on the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation: Evidence from SMEs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 4, pp. 765-798, (2021); Helfat C.E., Peteraf M.A., Managerial cognitive capabilities and the micro foundations of dynamic capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 36, 6, pp. 831-850, (2015); (2010); (2015); Overall assessment of the higher education sector, (2016); Annual report 2020-2021., (2021); Huang C.J., Liu C.J., Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, pp. 237-252, (2005); Huang C.C., Huang S.M., External and internal capabilities and organizational performance: Does intellectual capital matter?, Asia Pacific Management Review, 25, 2, pp. 111-120, (2020); Hult G.T.M., Hurley R.F., Knight G.A., Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 5, pp. 429-438, (2004); Itami H., Mobilizing invisible assets, (1987); Isa C.R., Saleh Z., Sapiei N.S., A survey on financial and management accounting practices among small and medium enterprises in malaysia, Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 1, 1, pp. 13-25, (2008); Jiang W., Rosati F., Chai H., Feng T., Market orientation practices enhancing corporate environmental performance via knowledge creation: Does environmental management system implementation matter?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 5, pp. 1899-1924, (2020); Kianto A., What do we really mean by the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital?, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4, 4, pp. 342-356, (2007); Kidwell J.J., Vander Linde K., Johnson S.L., Applying corporate knowledge management practices in higher education, Educause quarterly, 23, 4, pp. 28-33, (2000); Kivisto J., Pekkola E., Berg L.N., Hansen H.F., Geschwind L., Lyytinen A., Performance in higher education institutions and its variations in Nordic policy, Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education, pp. 37-67, (2019); Kohoutek J., Pinheiro R., Cabelkova I., Smidova M., The role of higher education in the socio-economic development of peripheral regions, Higher Education Policy, 30, 4, pp. 401-403, (2017); Kohtamaki M., Vesalainen J., Henneberg S., Naude P., Ventresca M.J., Enabling relationship structures and relationship performance improvement: The moderating role of relational capital, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 8, pp. 1298-1309, (2012); Kruss G., Visser M., Putting university–industry interaction into perspective: A differentiated view from inside South African universities, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 4, pp. 884-908, (2017); Krishna V., Jain S.K., Modes of collaboration in open innovation practice of pharmaceutical firms in India: the analysis of survey and patent data, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 2, pp. 222-248, (2020); Lages C.R., Piercy N.F., Key drivers of frontline employee generation of ideas for customer service improvement, Journal of Service Research, 15, 2, pp. 215-230, (2012); Larran M., Lopez A., Calzado M.Y., Expectativas de los stakeholders en las Universidades públicas españolas: Un estudio empírico. XIV Encuentro de la Asociación Española de Profesores Universitarios de Contabilidad (ASEPUC), A Coruña, pp. 2-4, (2010); Lee H., Choi B., Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, pp. 179-228, (2003); Lev B., Baruch Lev, Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting, (2001); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management accounting research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Link A.N., Ruhm C.J., Public knowledge, private knowledge: The intellectual capital of entrepreneurs, Small Business Economics, 36, 1, pp. 1-14, (2011); Lu W.M., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modelling, 29, 4, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C., Theriou G., The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance, Journal of intellectual capital, 12, 1, pp. 132-151, (2011); Markman G.D., Phan P.H., Balkin D.B., Gianiodis P.T., Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2, pp. 241-263, (2005); Marr B., Chatzkel J., Intellectual capital at the crossroads: Managing, measuring, and reporting of IC, Journal of intellectual capital, 59, 2, pp. 224-229, (2004); Marr B., (2008); Maritz A., Networking, entrepreneurship and productivity in universities, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12, 1, pp. 18-25, (2010); Maritan A.C., Peteraf M.A., Building a bridge between resource acquisition and resource accumulation, Journal of Management, 37, 5, pp. 1374-1389, (2011); Matricano D., Candelo E., Sorrentino M., Cappiello G., Investigating the link between intellectual capital and open innovation processes: A longitudinal case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 3, pp. 538-557, (2020); McCarthy I.P., Silvestre B.S., von Nordenflycht A., Breznitz S.M., A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, pp. 110-122, (2018); Miles S.J., Van Clieaf M., Strategic fit: Key to growing enterprise value through organizational capital, Business Horizons, 60, 1, pp. 55-65, (2017); Moncayo-Martinez L.A., Ramirez-afarrate A., Hernandez-Balderrama M.G., Evaluation of public HEI on teaching, research, and knowledge dissemination by data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, (2020); Mills A.M., Smith T.A., Knowledge management and organizational performance: A decomposed view, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 1, pp. 156-171, (2011); Munjal S., Andersson U., Pereira V., Budhwar P., Exploring reverse knowledge transfer and asset augmentation strategy by developed country MNEs: Case study evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry, International Business Review, 30, 6, (2021); Nakamura L., Intangibles: What put the new in the new economy?, Business Review, pp. 03-16, (1999); Nelson R.R., Rosenberg N., Technical innovation and national systems, National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, 1, pp. 3-21, (1993); Nicolo G., Raimo N., Polcini P.T., Vitolla F., Unveiling the link between performance and intellectual capital disclosure in the context of Italian public universities, Evaluation and Program Planning, 88, (2021); Nicolo G., The rise of intellectual capital disclosure from private to public sector: The case of Italian public universities., pp. 1-189, (2020); Nicolo G., Manes-Rossi F., Christiaens J., Aversano N., Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 4, pp. 1055-1087, (2020); Ngoc-Tan N., Gregar A., Impacts of knowledge management on innovations in higher education institutions: An empirical evidence from Vietnam, (2018); Nguyen T., EO incentives and corporate innovation, The Financial Review, 53, pp. 255-300, (2018); Nwagwu W.E., The Nigerian university and the triple helix model of innovation systems: Adjusting the wellhead, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 6, pp. 683-696, (2008); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., Classic Work: Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, pp. 139-182, (2000); Noel T.K., Finocchio B., Using theories of human, social, structural, and positive psychological capital to explore the attrition of former public-school practitioners, International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, (2022); Gross domestic spending on R&D (Indicator)., (2019); R&D personnel by sector and function, (2020); Ortega G.P., Intangible assets and intellectual capital: An approach to the challenges of accounting, Knowledge. Science and Freedom, 8, 1, pp. 143-166, (2013); O'Neill M., Bagchi-Sen S., Public universities and human capital development in the United States, (2020); Pallant J., SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows, (2010); Paoloni P., Modaffari G., Mattei G., The traditional Italian universities’ reaction to the pandemic emergency: The role of the intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 5, pp. 1138-1159, (2021); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions: Operationalising measurement through a strategic prospective lens, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 355-381, (2019); Perkmann M., Walsh K., University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 4, pp. 259-280, (2007); Petruzzelli A.M., Ardito L., Savino T., Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size, Journal of Business Research, 86, pp. 190-201, (2018); Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5, pp. 879-903, (2003); Ramirez Y., Loduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-744, (2007); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Tajeda A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities: A new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Rehman W.U., Degirmen S., Waseem F., Propensity for and quality of intellectual capital divulgence across the BRICS banking sector: A knowledge-based perspective from emerging economies, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, pp. 1028-1055, (2022); Robertson J., McCarthy I.P., Pitt L., Leveraging social capital in university-industry knowledge transfer strategies: A comparative positioning framework, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, (2019); Rodriguez-Rebes L., Navio-Marco J., Ibar-Alonso R., Influence of organisational innovation and innovation in general on eco-innovation in European companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 5, pp. 840-867, (2021); Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N., Edvinsson L., Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape, (1997); Roxas B., Battisti M., Deakins D., Learning, innovation and firm performance: Knowledge management in small firms, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, 4, pp. 443-453, (2014); Sampat B.N., Mowery D.C., Universities in national innovation systems, (2004); Sanchez R., Heene A., Thomas H., Dynamics of competence-based competition, (1996); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Smidova Z., Educational outcomes: A literature review of policy drivers from a macroeconomic perspective, World Bank’s Human Capital Project., (2019); Salinas-Avila J., Abreu-Ledon R., Tamayo-Arias J., Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: An empirical study from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 1053-1084, (2020); Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A., Research Methods for Business Students, (2007); Seleim A., Ashour A., Bontis N., Intellectual capital in Egyptian software firms, The Learning Organization, 11, 4-5, pp. 332-346, (2004); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities. A dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-422, (2015); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Sharabati A.A., Jawad S.N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision, 48, 1, pp. 105-131, (2010); Shewchuk R.M., O'Connor S.J., Fine D.J., Building an understanding of the competencies needed for health administration practice, Journal of Healthcare Management, 50, 1, pp. 32-48, (2005); Scuotto V., Del Giudice M., Bresciani S., Meissner D., Knowledge driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes: An explorative view on small to medium enterprises, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, pp. 640-655, (2017); Serino L., Papa A., Campanella F., Di Gioia L., The sourcing for collaborative knowledge translation in distributed R&D processes: A cross-regional study, Management Decision, 58, 9, pp. 2027-2048, (2020); Sila I., Ebrahimpour M., Critical linkages among TQM factors and business results, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 11, pp. 1123-1155, (2005); Silvestri A., Veltri S., The intellectual capital report within universities: Comparing experiences, Economic Science Series, 20, 2, pp. 618-624, (2011); Singla H.K., Shrivas A., Sharma A., Identification of knowledge assets in construction projects and their impact on project performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 3, pp. 558-587, (2022); Stalk G., Evans P., Shulman L.E., Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 70, 2, pp. 57-69, (1992); Stahle P., Bounfour A., Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 2, pp. 164-177, (2008); Stewart T., The new wealth of organizations, (1997); Subramaniam M., Youndt M., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Tan H.P., Plowman D., Hancock P., The evolving research on intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 4, pp. 585-608, (2007); Teece D.J., Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 13, pp. 1319-1350, (2007); Teixeira S.J., Veiga P.M., Fernandes C.A., The knowledge transfer and cooperation between universities and enterprises, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17, 4, pp. 449-460, (2018); Thrassou A., Vrontis D., Crescimanno M., Giacomarra M., Galati A., The requisite match between internal resources and network ties to cope with knowledge scarcity, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 4, pp. 861-880, (2020); Tseng C.Y., Goo Y.J.J., Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: Empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers, R&D Management, 35, 2, pp. 187-201, (2005); Tidd J., Bessant J., Pavitt K., Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, (2005); Torres I.T., Gutierrez L., Montes F.J.L., Organizational learning and innovation as sources of strategic fit, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116, 8, pp. 1445-1467, (2016); van Langenhove L., Eriksson P., The role of European Union in creating Europe of knowledge, In New Movements in Academic Entrepreneurship, pp. 19-30, (2021); Veiga C.P., Veiga C.R.P., Giacomini M.M., Kato H., T., & Corso, J J.M.L., Evolution of capabilities in the discovery cycle of an innovation in the pharmaceutical market, International Review of Management and Marketing, 5, 3, pp. 141-153, (2015); Vidrascu P.A., Intellectual capital, an intangible item not reflected in the financial statements of the organizational structure, Internal Auditing and Risk Management, 42, 1, pp. 169-177, (2016); Vo D.H., Tran N.P., Measuring national intellectual capital: A novel approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 4, pp. 799-815, (2022); Vrontis D., Christofi M., Battisti E., Graziano E.A., Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing and equity crowdfunding, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 1, pp. 95-121, (2021); Wade M., Hulland J., Review: The Resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension and suggestions for future research, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28, 1, pp. 107-142, (2004); Warden C., New modes of self-description: Universities reaction in a changing environment, paper presented at the workshop towards a multiversity?, Bielefed, pp. 11-13, (2004); Weber A.S., The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 2589-2594, (2011); Wu Y., Chang M., Chen C., Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation, R&D Management, 38, 3, pp. 265-277, (2008); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese universities: A hybrid fuzzy model application, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2, pp. 1635-1642, (2010); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Ways to promote valuable innovation: Intellectual capital assessment for higher education system, Quality and Quantity, 46, 1, pp. 1377-1391, (2012); Yoda N., Kuwashima K., Triple helix of university–industry–government relations in Japan: Transitions of collaborations and interactions, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, pp. 1120-1144, (2020); Yalama A., Coskun M., Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock exchange market, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 2, pp. 256-271, (2007)","W. Rehman; Department of Business Administration, University of the Punjab, Gujranwala, Gujranwala Campus, Pakistan; email: wasimulrehman@yahoo.com","","Springer","","","","","","18687865","","","","English","J. Knowl. Econ.","Article","Article in press","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85151267013"
"Okolo C.V.; Wen J.; Eze J.O.","Okolo, Chukwuemeka Valentine (57331298100); Wen, Jun (57260332700); Eze, Juliet Oluchi (58677478900)","57331298100; 57260332700; 58677478900","Does tertiary education promote technological innovation sustainability? The role of national intellectual capital. An empirical evidence","2023","Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja ","36","3","2264374","","","","0","10.1080/1331677X.2023.2264374","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175530102&doi=10.1080%2f1331677X.2023.2264374&partnerID=40&md5=73a54990645005522b011980968cf5ee","School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an, China; Jinhe Center for Economic Research (JCER), Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an, China","Okolo C.V., School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an, China; Wen J., School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an, China; Eze J.O., Jinhe Center for Economic Research (JCER), Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an, China","Tertiary education redefines its role in research and innovation, acting as a proponent of the research and innovation culture, creating real-world solutions, and bridging the gap between decision-making, governance, and innovation. We empirically explore tertiary education’s effect on innovation and national intellectual capital’s role. The empirical findings of the 2SLS and instrumental variable fixed effect model with Driscoll-Kraay robust standard errors, based on panel evidence from 79 economies from 1995 to 2017, show that tertiary education has a positive and substantial effect on innovation performance as determined by patent and trademark applications. Comparable results are obtained using instrumental variable panel quantile regression as robustness tests to support the findings. Also, theoretically, the result shows that national intellectual capital reinforces the impact of tertiary education as a catalyst for technological progress. The findings support R&D data policies that support specific digital innovation, skills, knowledge creation, and diffusion. Proactive policy frameworks should be adopted to promote national intellectual capital through internet infrastructure for economic inclusion that fosters innovativeness; tertiary education using digital technology redefines creativity, stimulates cooperation, and aids in forming innovative ecosystems; boosting government and private grants to university academics allows for identifying ideas with the greatest long-term potential. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","innovative activity; national intellectual capital; research and development; Tertiary education","educational attainment; error analysis; innovation; research and development; research work; sustainability; technological development","","","","","Does Tertiary Education Promote Technological Innovation Sustainability?, (72074176); National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC","Jun WEN is grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the Project: Does Tertiary Education Promote Technological Innovation Sustainability? The Role of National Intellectual Capital. An Empirical Evidence: (the grant number: 72074176).","Aizstrauta D., Ginters E., Eroles M.A.P., Applying theory of diffusion of innovations to evaluate technology acceptance and sustainability, Procedia Computer Science, 43, C, pp. 69-77, (2015); Akman G., Yilmaz C., Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: An empirical analysis in Turkish software industry, Managing Innovation: What Do We Know About Innovation Success Factors?, (2019); Altindag O., Fidanbas O., Irdan G., The impact of intellectual capital on innovation: A literature study © Society for Business and Management Dynamics © Society for Business and Management Dynamics, Business Management Dynamics, 8, 12, pp. 1-12, (2019); Andrijauskiene M., Dumciuviene D., Inward foreign direct investment and national innovative capacity, Engineering Economics, 30, 3, pp. 339-348, (2019); Asongu S.A., On the effect of foreign aid on corruption, SSRN Electronic Journal, 32, 3, pp. 2174-2180, (2012); Asongu S.A., Financial development dynamic thresholds of financial globalization: Evidence from Africa, Journal of Economic Studies, 41, 2, pp. 166-195, (2014); Asongu S.A., The impact of health worker migration on development dynamics: Evidence of wealth effects from Africa, European Journal of Health Economics, 15, 2, pp. 187-201, (2014); Asongu S.A., Biekpe N., Globalization and terror in Africa, International Economics, 156, pp. 86-97, (2018); Asongu S.A., Mohamed J., On the channels of foreign aid to corruption, SSRN Electronic Journal, 33, 3, pp. 2191-2201, (2013); Asongu S.A., Nwachukwu J.C., The impact of terrorism on governance in African Countries, World Development, 99, pp. 253-270, (2017); Asongu S.A., Odhiambo N.M., Foreign direct investment, information technology and economic growth dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa, Telecommunications Policy, 44, 1, (2020); Avvisati F., Jacotin G., Vincent-Lancrin S., Educating higher education students for innovative economies: What international data tell us, Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 1, 1, (2014); Baltagi B.H., Kao C., Peng B., Testing cross-sectional correlation in large panel data models with serial correlation, Econometrics, 4, 4, (2016); Bianchi N., Giorcelli M., Scientific education and innovation: From technical diplomas to university stem degrees, Journal of the European Economic Association, 18, 5, pp. 2608-2646, (2020); Bonazzi F.L.Z., Zilber M.A., Innovation and business model: A case study about integration of innovation funnel and business model Canvas, Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 16, 53, pp. 616-637, (2014); Chahal H., Bakshi P., Effect of intellectual capital on competitive advantage and business performance: Role of innovation and learning culture, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 52-70, (2014); Chang W.S., Hsieh J.J., Intellectual capital and value creation-is innovation capital a missing link?, International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 2, (2011); Diaz Diaz B., La atención a la dependencia como motor de desarrollo económico, Revista Internacional de Sociología, 72, 1, pp. 139-171, (2014); Donou-Adonsou F., Technology, education, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, Telecommunications Policy, 43, 4, pp. 353-360, (2019); Driscoll J.C., Kraay A.C., Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 4, pp. 549-560, (1998); Efobi U., Asongu S., Okafor C., Tchamyou V., Tanankem B., Remittances, finance and industrialisation in Africa, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49, pp. 54-66, (2019); Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy, Training, pp. 1-13, (2005); Gardner H., (1993); The Database | Penn World Table | Productivity | University of Groningen., (2018); Hall B.H., Lerner J., The financing of R&D and innovation, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, pp. 609-639, (2010); Hanushek E.A., Woessmann L., Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation, Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 4, pp. 267-321, (2012); Hoechle D., Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence, Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 7, 3, pp. 281-312, (2007); Hsu P.H., Tian X., Xu Y., Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 112, 1, pp. 116-135, (2014); (2020); Jalles J.T., How to measure innovation? New evidence of the technology-growth linkage, Research in Economics, 64, 2, pp. 81-96, (2010); Kalkan A., Bozkurt O.C., Arman M., The impacts of intellectual capital, innovation and organizational strategy on firm performance, Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, pp. 700-707, (2014); Koenker R., Bassett G., Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46, 1, (1978); Kremer M., Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 3, pp. 681-716, (1993); Levy F., Murnane R.J., How computerized work and globalization shape human skill demands, In Learning in the Global Era: International Perspectives on Globalization and Education, pp. 158-174, (2007); Lin C.Y.Y., Edvinsson L., (2011); Lin C.Y.Y., Edvinsson L., National intellectual capital in Israel and financial crisis impact, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 4, 3, pp. 245-273, (2013); Lloyd-Ellis H., Roberts J., Twin engines of growth: Skills and technology as equal partners in balanced growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 2, pp. 87-115, (2002); Lu W.M., Kweh Q.L., Huang C.L., Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance, Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, pp. 201-210, (2014); Luo J., Cheng K., The influence of FDI on energy efficiency of China: An empirical analysis based on DEA method, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 291-294, pp. 1217-1220, (2013); Marcin K., Intellectual capital as a key factor of socio-economic development of regions and countries, Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, pp. 288-295, (2013); Muresan M., Gogu E., Tertiary education’s role in research and innovation, Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, pp. 3681-3688, (2012); Pesaran M.H., Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels, Econometric Reviews, 34, 6-10, pp. 1089-1117, (2015); Pradhan R.P., Arvin M.B., Hall J.H., Nair M., Innovation, financial development and economic growth in Eurozone countries, Applied Economics Letters, 23, 16, pp. 1141-1144, (2016); Ribeiro J.M.P., Barbosa S.B., Casagrande J.L., Sehnem S., Berchin I.I., da Silva C.G., da Silveira A.C.M., Zimmer G.A.A., Faraco R.A., de Andrade Guerra J.B.S.O., Promotion of sustainable development at universities: The adoption of green campus strategies at the University of Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil, World Sustainability Series, pp. 471-486, (2017); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez P., Elena S., Castrillo R., (2007); Sandner P.G., Block J., The market value of R & D, patents, and trademarks, Research Policy, 40, 7, pp. 969-985, (2011); Stevanovic T., Ivanovic-Dukic M., Radenovic T., Radovic O., The impact of national intellectual capital on the economic growth in the South-Eastern European Countries, Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci, 36, 2, pp. 777-800, (2018); Todericiu R., Serban A., Intellectual capital and its relationship with universities, Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, pp. 713-717, (2015); Toivanen O., Vaananen L., Education and invention, Review of Economics and Statistics, 98, 2, pp. 382-396, (2016); (2020); Vandenbussche J., Aghion P., Meghir C., Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital, Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 2, pp. 97-127, (2006); Vanderstraeten R., Biesta G., Constructivism, educational research, and John Dewey, The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, pp. 34-39, (1998); Wen J., Deng P., Zhang Q., Chang C.P., Is higher government efficiency bringing about higher innovation?, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27, 3, pp. 626-655, (2021); (2020); (2020); Zambon S., Monciardini D., Intellectual capital and innovation. A guideline for future research, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 17, 2, pp. 13-26, (2015); Zhou H., Sandner P.G., Martinelli S.L., Block J.H., Patents, trademarks, and their complementarity in venture capital funding, Technovation, 47, pp. 14-22, (2016)","C.V. Okolo; School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China; email: okolojunior@outlook.com","","Taylor and Francis Ltd.","","","","","","1331677X","","","","English","Economic Res. Ekon. Istraz.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85175530102"
"Anggraini F.; Abdul-Hamid M.A.; Azlina M.K.A.","Anggraini, Fivi (57205446253); Abdul-Hamid, Mohamad Ali (13609051900); Azlina, M. Kassim Aza (57205443168)","57205446253; 13609051900; 57205443168","The role of intellectual capital on public universities performance in Indonesia","2018","Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","26","4","","2453","2472","19","9","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060055067&partnerID=40&md5=a58905c5fec2dbf1e8e6217d67990304","Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, PO Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Universiti Selangor, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40000, Malaysia","Anggraini F., Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; Abdul-Hamid M.A., Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, PO Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Azlina M.K.A., Universiti Selangor, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Shah Alam, Selangor, 40000, Malaysia","Intellectual capital is anticipated as the key factors that could contribute to universities performance and create value for globally competitive advantage. Accordingly, this study investigates the role of intellectual capital and its elements: namely human capital, structural capital and relational capital, on the public universities performance in Indonesia. A total of 177 respondents representing from 8 top public universities in Indonesia were involved in the study. The Partial Least Square (PLS) was used to test the hypotheses. The result found that there was a significant relationship of Intellectual Capital (IC) and its elements on universities performance. Conclusively, it is wise to recommend to the university to invest in intellectual capital consisting of human capital, structural capital and relational capital. Also, these elements should be used as a new model for measurement of the university or higher education institution performance so that it provides added value to strengthen their competitiveness ability. © 2018 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.","Human capital; Intellectual capital; Relational capital; Structural capital; Universities performance","","","","","","","","Abadulai M.S., Kwon Y., Moon J., Intellectual capital and firm performance: An empirical study of software firms in West Africa, The African Journal of Information Systems, 4, 1, pp. 1-30, (2012); Ajisafe O.E., Orifa R.A.O., Balagun J.A., Influence of human capital management on organizational performance, Journal of Resources Development and Management, 14, pp. 8-14, (2015); Amin M., Ismail W.K.W., Rasid S.Z.A., Selamani R.D.A., The impact of human resources management practices on performance: Evidence from a public university, The TQM Journal, 26, 2, pp. 125-142, (2014); Benzhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5-8, pp. 433-462, (1999); Bontis N., Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 1, pp. 41-60, (2001); Canibano L., Sanchez P.M., Intangibles in universities: Current challenges for measuring and reporting, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Cegarra-Navarro J.G., Sanchez-Polo M.T., Linking national contexts with intellectual capital: A comparison between Spain and Morocco, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 1, pp. 329-342, (2010); Chin W.W., The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling, Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 295-336, (1998); Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (1988); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a university, Conference on Trends in the Management of Human Resources in Higher Education, pp. 1-9, (2005); Fletcher A., Guthrie J., Steane P., Roos G., Pike S., Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 4, pp. 505-527, (2003); Grasenick K., Low J., Shaken, not stirred: Defining and connecting indicators for the measurement and valuation of intangibles, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 268-281, (2004); Griffin M., Organisational Performance Model, (2003); Gruian C.M., The influence of intellectual capital on Romanian companies' financial performance, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 13, 2, pp. 260-272, (2011); Hair J., Hult C Ringle T., Sartstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2013); Hashim M.J., Osman I., Alhabshi S.M., Effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 211, pp. 207-214, (2015); Hughes J.C., Are our universities ready for a paradigm shift?, The Globe and Mail, (2013); Jamal W., Saif M.I., Impact of human capital management on organizational performance, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 34, pp. 55-69, (2011); Jones N., Meadow C., Sicilia M.A., Measuring intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8, 2, pp. 113-136, (2009); Khan M.A., Effects of human resource management practices on organizational performance: An empirical study of oil and gas industry in Pakistan, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 24, pp. 157-175, (2010); Khalique M., Shaari J.A.N., Isa A.H.M., Ageel A., Role of intellectual capital on the organizational performance of electrical and electronic SMEs in Pakistan, International Journal of Business Management, 6, 9, pp. 253-257, (2011); Khalique M., Shaari J.A.N., Isa A.H.M., Samad N., Impact of intellectual capital on the organizational performance of Islamic banking sector in Malaysia, Asia Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5, 2, pp. 75-83, (2013); Kock N., Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses and measurement model assessments in PLS-Based SEM, International Journal of E-collaboration, 10, 1, pp. 1-13, (2014); Kong E., The strategic importance of intellectual capital in non-profit sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 721-731, (2007); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application within the reorganization of Austrian universities, The Conference on Transparent Enterprise, the Value of Intangibles, pp. 1-20, (2002); Leitner K.H., Managing and reporting intangible assets in research technology organisations, R & D Management, 35, 2, pp. 125-136, (2005); Lopes-Costa J.A., Munoz-Canavate A., Relational capital and organizational performancevin the Portuguese Hotel Sector (NUTS II Lisbon), Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, pp. 64-71, (2015); Lu W.M., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modeling, 29, 4, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); Meihami B., Karimi J., The relationship between intellectual capital reporting and universities performance, MAGNT Research Report, 2, 5, pp. 748-754, (2014); Higher Education Database (In Indonesian), (2015); Pablos P., The nature of knowledge-based resources through the design of architecture of human resource management systems: Implications for strategic management, International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 6-7, pp. 533-543, (2004); Puspitahati A., Ulum I., Prasetyo A., Analisis pengungkapan intellectual capital pada website tiga perguruan tinggi di Indonesia, Proceeding National Seminar on ""Studying on Actual Research for Developing New Theory of Economics and Business"" (In Indonesian), pp. 20-36, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C., Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital: Navigating the New Business Landscape, (1997); Sadalia I., Lubis A.N., Discriminant analysis of intellectual capital model of state University in Medan, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, pp. 476-480, (2015); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sharabati A.A., Jawad S.N., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision, 48, 1, pp. 105-131, (2010); Stevens R.H., Comparison and Association of Intellectual Capital: Investigation and Measurement of the Value of Intellectual Capital Assets and Their Contribution to Stakeholder's Perception Within the Framework of Higher Education, (2011); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Stiles P., Kulvisaechana S., Human Capital and Performance: A Literature Review, pp. 1-39, (2003); Thursby J.G., Kemp S., Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy, 31, 1, pp. 109-124, (2002); Ulum I., Constructing components of intellectual capital for higher education in Indonesia (in Indonesian), Jurnal Review Akuntansi & Keuangan, 2, 2, pp. 251-262, (2012); Van Buren M.E., A yardstick for knowledge management, Training & Development, 53, pp. 71-78, (1999); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Vishnu S., Gupta V.K., Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 83-99, (2014); Wang X., Performance Measurement in Universities; Managerial Perspective, (2010); Wang Z., Wang N., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); Wang W., Chang C., Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 222-236, (2005); Zlate S., Enache C., The interdependence between human capital and organizational performance in higher education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 2015, pp. 136-143, (2015)","F. Anggraini; Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; email: fivianggraini@bunghatta.ac.id","","Universiti Putra Malaysia","","","","","","01287702","","","","English","Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85060055067"
"Meissner D.; Shmatko N.","Meissner, Dirk (55337583500); Shmatko, Natalia (6507223957)","55337583500; 6507223957","“Keep open”: the potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new Knowledge Triangle","2017","Technological Forecasting and Social Change","123","","","191","198","7","26","10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.012","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961911071&doi=10.1016%2fj.techfore.2016.03.012&partnerID=40&md5=4e4f17097381faab66360878cbe72b3e","National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Street, 20, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation","Meissner D., National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Street, 20, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation; Shmatko N., National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya Street, 20, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation","Universities are increasingly seen as institutions which anticipate and address the challenges induced by interactions within the Knowledge Triangle (KT). The interactions between actors in the KT force individual agents to adjust and refine their models of operation and provide targeted output which supports the activities of other agents. Among companies, we saw the emergence of the open innovation concept which stresses the will of companies to cooperate in innovation. At the same time, the scientific community is increasingly challenged by open access to research findings and by online learning courses. These two recent developments are among the most important that were significantly initiated by gatekeepers, themselves especially important actors within the KT because they possess the power to orchestrate and direct the linkages between KT actors. Until recently, the role of gatekeepers within the KT has been little analysed. The paper suggests that understanding the role and characteristics of gatekeepers is essential for substantial and sustainable interactions between KT agents and the fulfilment of the Third Mission of universities. Therefore, the linkages go beyond purely knowledge and technology transfer linkages but rather show how gatekeepers influence competency-building for delivering information and technologies to other organizations and enhancing institutions' absorptive capacity which is argued to be crucial for implementing effective, targeted, and productive interactions of universities. It is argued that universities need to be aware of gatekeepers' competences and powers well in advance to make use of knowledge exchange with other parties to shape society. In addition, it is argued that universities' skill base – as shown in researchers' competences – is a vital element of universities' intellectual capital which should be included in universities' performance evaluation frameworks. Finally, the paper argues that it is important for policy making in science, technology and innovation to possess knowledge of gatekeepers' position in the KT to enhance collaboration between KT agents and provide research institutions, namely universities, with the competences needed to vitalize the universities' ‘Third Mission’. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.","Expertise; Gatekeepers; Internationalization; Knowledge Triangle; Modernization agenda; Societal challenges; Third Mission","Technology transfer; Expertise; Gatekeeper; Individual agent; Internationalisation; Knowledge triangle; Modernization agenda; Open innovation; Power; Societal challenge; Third mission; innovation; Internet; learning; modernization; research; science and technology; technology transfer; university sector; Knowledge management","","","","","","","Almirall E., Living labs and open innovation: roles and applicability, Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Netw., 10, Special Issue on Living Labs, (2008); Awazu Y., Desouza K.C., Open knowledge management: lessons from the open source revolution, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 55, 11, pp. 1016-1019, (2004); Brown A., Developing career adaptability and innovative capabilities through learning and working in Norway and the United Kingdom, J. Knowl. Econ., 6, 2, pp. 402-419, (2015); Brown R.M., The Gatekeeper Reassessed: A Return to Levin., J. Mass Commun. Q., 56, 3, (1979); Carayannis E.G., Meissner D., Edelkina A., Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice, J. Technol. Transf., (2015); Cervantes M., Meissner D., Commercialising public research under the open innovation model: new trends, Foresight-Russia, 8, 3, pp. 70-81, (2014); Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F., The open innovation journey: how firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm, Technovation, 31, 2011, pp. 34-43, (2011); Corra M., Willer D., The gatekeeper, Sociol. Theory, 20, 2, pp. 180-207, (2002); Cross R., Cummings J.N., Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work, Acad. Manag. J., 47, 6, pp. 928-937, (2004); Dahlandera L., Gann D.M., How open is innovation?, Res. Policy, 39, 2010, pp. 699-709, (2010); Dettmann E., Dominguez L.I., Gunther J., Jindra B., Determinants of foreign technological activity in German regions — a count model analysis of transnational patents, Foresight-Russia, 8, 1, pp. 34-51, (2014); Doz Y., Santos J., Wiliamson P., Is your innovation process global?, INSEAD Working Paper Series 2004/09/SM, (2004); Eikeland O., Symbiotic learning systems: reorganizing and integrating learning efforts and responsibilities between higher educational Institutions (HEIs) and work places, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 1, pp. 98-118, (2013); Fallick B., Fleischman C.A., Rebitzer J.B., Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., (2004); Forrest C.B., Primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?, BMJ, 326, 7391, pp. 692-695, (2003); Geuna A., The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?, J. Econ. Issues, 35, 3, pp. 607-632, (2001); Gokhberg L., Kitova G., Roud V., Tax incentives for R&D and innovation: demand versus effects, Foresight-Russia, 8, 3, pp. 18-41, (2014); Gokhberg L., Meissner D., Innovation: superpowered invention, Nature, 501, pp. 313-314, (2013); Harison E., Koski H., Applying open innovation in business strategies: evidence from Finnish software firms, Res. Policy, 39, 2010, pp. 351-359, (2009); Harorimana D., The gatekeepers' intervention in innovation and technological transfer, Electron. J. Knowl. Manag., 7, 1, pp. 63-76, (2009); Huizingh E.K.R.E., Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives, Technovation, 31, 2011, pp. 2-9, (2011); Jaekel M., Wallin A., Isomursu M., Guiding networked innovation projects towards commercial success—a case study of an EU innovation programme with Implications for targeted open innovation, J. Knowl. Econ., 6, 3, pp. 625-639, (2015); Jonsson L., Baraldi E., Larsson L.E., Forsberg P., Severinsson K., Targeting academic engagement in open innovation: tools, effects and challenges for university management. Targeting academic engagement in open innovation: tools, effects and challenges for university management, J. Knowl. Econ., 6, 3, pp. 522-550, (2015); Kanter R.M., Dilemmas of Managing Participation. Readings in Human Resource Management, pp. 196-226, (1985); Lee S., Park G., Yoon B., Park J., Open innovation in SMEs — an intermediated networking model, Res. Policy, 39, 2, pp. 290-300, (2010); Leydesdorff L., The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?, J. Knowl. Econ., 3, 1, pp. 25-35, (2012); Markard J., Truffer B., Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 20, 4, pp. 443-464, (2008); Meissner D., Public–private partnership models for science, technology, and innovation cooperation, J. Knowl. Econ., (2015); Meissner D., Gokhberg L., Sokolov A., The meaning of foresight in science technology and innovation policy, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future — Potentials and Limits of Foresight Studies, pp. 1-7, (2013); Miller R., Shapiro H., Hilding-Hamann K.E., Punie Y., Ala-Mutka K., Redecker C., School's over — learning spaces in Europe in 2020: an imagining exercise on the future of learning, EUR 23532 EN, JRC-IPTS, (2008); Nikulainen T., What makes a gatekeeper? insights from the Finnish nano-community, DRUID Working Paper No. 07-03, (2007); OECD, Performance-based funding for public research in tertiary education institutions, Workshop Proceedings, (2010); Pohlmann M., Gebhardt C., Etzkowitz H., The development of innovation systems and the art of innovation management—strategy, control and the culture of innovation, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 17, 1, pp. 1-7, (2005); Pollack, Zeckhauser, Budgets as dynamic gatekeepers, Manag. Sci., 42, 5, pp. 642-658, (1996); Shmatko N., Katchanov Y., Gatekeepers in Russian High-Tech: A Study of Leading Research Centers, Series Science, Technology and Innovation WP BRP 39/STI/2015, (2015); Sokolov A., Future science and technology: Delphi study results, Foresight, 3, 3, pp. 40-58, (2010); Van den Biesen J., Open Innovation @ Philips Research; Presentation at the Business Symposium “Open Innovation in Global Networks” Organised by the OECD and the Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority, Copenhagen, February 25–26, 2008, (2008); West J., Lakhani K.R., Getting clear about communities in open innovation, Ind. Innov., 15, 2, pp. 223-231, (2008)","D. Meissner; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Street, 20, 101000, Russian Federation; email: dmeissner@hse.ru","","Elsevier Inc.","","","","","","00401625","","","","English","Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84961911071"
"Bonaccorsi A.; Barin L.; Belingheri P.; Biagi F.; Sanchez-Barrioluengo M.","Bonaccorsi, Andrea (7005502691); Barin, Laura (57201633491); Belingheri, Paola (57191608010); Biagi, Federico (35459547600); Sanchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel (53864081500)","7005502691; 57201633491; 57191608010; 35459547600; 53864081500","Is higher education more important for firms than research? Disentangling university spillovers","2023","Journal of Technology Transfer","","","","","","","4","10.1007/s10961-023-10008-y","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159459761&doi=10.1007%2fs10961-023-10008-y&partnerID=40&md5=8f63077cfd62e73937ec3f9f8e657130","School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, Pisa, 56122, Italy; IRVAPP-FBK, Vicolo Dalla Piccola 12, Trento, 38122, Italy; JRC Directorate B “Fair and Sustainable Economy”, Unit B.6 “Industrial strategy, skills, and technology transfer”, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy; Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom","Bonaccorsi A., School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, Pisa, 56122, Italy, IRVAPP-FBK, Vicolo Dalla Piccola 12, Trento, 38122, Italy; Barin L., IRVAPP-FBK, Vicolo Dalla Piccola 12, Trento, 38122, Italy; Belingheri P., School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, Pisa, 56122, Italy; Biagi F., JRC Directorate B “Fair and Sustainable Economy”, Unit B.6 “Industrial strategy, skills, and technology transfer”, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy; Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom","The paper is the first attempt to integrate microdata on universities and firms across most European countries in order to disentangle the impact of knowledge spillovers from human capital (graduates) and intellectual capital (codified research output) on the performance of firms. Data cover all Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) registered in the official European Tertiary Education Register (ETER). Data on performance of firms are from ORBIS and refer to change in the 2011–2015 period in turnover, total assets, intangible assets, and employment. Firms are georeferred and the spillovers from all HEIs located at a given distance are summed and integrated. The findings suggest that, among knowledge spillovers, the creation of human capital via education of students has a larger impact than the circulation of research knowledge. Moreover, the two factors seem to be complements rather than substitutes. Spatial proximity is important for embodied knowledge spillovers (i.e. educated people), while for codified and disembodied spillovers (citations to publications) the spatial dimension is less relevant. The findings have important managerial and policy-making consequences. © 2023, The Author(s).","Citations; Firm growth; Graduates; Higher education institutions; Human capital externalities; Knowledge spillovers","Personnel; Citation; Firm growth; Graduate; High educations; Higher education institutions; Human capital externality; Human capitals; Knowledge spillovers; Performance; University spillover; Knowledge management","","","","","Università di Pisa, UniPi","Open access funding provided by Università di Pisa within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. A preliminary version of the study was realised in the framework of the Knowledge-Hub of Higher Education, an Administrative Agreement between DG EDUCATION and CULTURE (EAC) and DG JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE (JRC). Its content was developed under the Service Contract number 934514-2017 A08-IT with FBK-IRVAPP (Trento, Italy). No funding is declared for the construction of the current dataset and the development of the paper. ","Abramovsky L., Harrison R., Simpson H., University research and the location of business R&D, The Economic Journal, 117, 519, pp. 114-141, (2007); Abreu M., Grinevich V., Hughes A., Kitson M., Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors, (2009); Acemoglu D., Dell M., Productivity differences between and within countries, American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 2, 1, (2010); Acs Z.J., Szerb L., Autio E., National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications, Research Policy, 43, 3, pp. 449-476, (2015); Acs Z., Braunerhjelm P., Audretsch D., Carlsson B., The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 32, 1, pp. 15-30, (2009); Agasisti T., Bertoletti A., Higher education and economic growth: A longitudinal study of European regions 2000–2017, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, (2020); Aghion P., Howitt P., Endogenous growth theory, (1998); Akcigit J., Pearce G., Prato M., Tapping into talent: Coupling education and innovation policies for economic growth, NBER Working Paper, (2020); Andersson R., Quigley J.M., Wilhelmson M., University decentralization as regional policy: The Swedish experiment, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 4, pp. 371-388, (2004); Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z., Local geographical spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp. 422-448, (1997); Audretsch D.B., Lehmann E.E., Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?, Research Policy, 34, 8, pp. 1191-1202, (2005); Barro R.J., Human capital and growth in cross-country regressions, (1998); Biagi F., Blasko Z., Castano Munoz J., Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Schnepf S., Role of universities shaping graduates’ labour market outcomes, In Paper Presented to the ISSI Conference, (2019); Biasi B., Ma S., The education-innovation gap, NBER Working Paper, (2022); Bloom N., Hassan T.A., Kalyani A., Lerner J., Tahoun A., The diffusion of disruptive technologies, (2021); Bonaccorsi A., Addressing the disenchantment. Universities and regional development, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, (2016); Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi L.C., University specialization and new firm creation across industries, Small Business Economics, 41, 4, pp. 837-863, (2013); Bonaccorsi A., Biancardi D., Biagi F., Study on Higher Education Institutions and Local Development, EUR 29802 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, (2019); Bonaccorsi A., Blasi B., Nappi C., Romagnosi S., Quality of research as source and signal: Revisiting the valorization process beyond substitution vs complementarity, Journal of Technology Transfer, (2021); Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi L.C., The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: Evidence from the Italian case, Small Business Economics, 43, 2, pp. 261-287, (2014); Bonander C., Et al., Universities as engines for regional growth? Using the synthetic control method to analyze the effects of research universities, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 60, pp. 198-207, (2016); Bottazzi L., Peri G., Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data, European Economic Review, 47, pp. 687-710, (2003); Bradley S., Taylor J., Human capital formation and local economic performance, Regional Studies, 30, 1, pp. 1-14, (1996); Brostrom A., Working with distant researchers. Distance and content in university-industry interaction, Research Policy, 39, pp. 1311-1320, (2010); Brunello G., Cappellari L., The labour market effects of Alma Mater. Evidence from Italy, Economics of Education Review, 27, 5, pp. 564-574, (2008); Buendia A.J.D., del Mar S., de la Vega M., Human capital effects on labour productivity in EU regions, Applied Economics, 47, 45, pp. 4814-4828, (2015); Castello-Climent A., Hidalgo-Cabrillana A., The role of educational quality and quantity in the process of economic development, Economics of Education Review, 31, 4, pp. 391-409, (2012); Chaytor S., Gottlieb G., Reid G., Regional policy and R&D: Evidence, experiments and expectations, Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) Report, 137, (2021); Ciriaci D., Does university quality influence the interregional mobility of students and graduates? The Case of Italy, Regional Studies, 48, 10, pp. 1592-1608, (2014); Colombo M.G., D'Adda D., Piva E., The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, pp. 113-140, (2010); Colombo M.G., Grilli L., On growth drivers if high tech start-ups. Exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital, Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 6, pp. 610-626, (2010); Levelling Up: The Role of Science and Technology in Addressing Regional Disparities and Promoting Equality of Opportunity, (2021); Cowan R., Zinovyeva N., University effects on regional innovation, Research Policy, 42, 3, pp. 788-800, (2013); D'Este P., Iammarino S., The spatial profile of university–business research partnerships, Papers in Regional Science, 89, pp. 335-350, (2010); De Fuentes C., Dutrenit G., Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: The case of Mexico, Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, pp. 329-348, (2016); Debski W., Swiderski B., Kurek J., Scientific research activity and GDP. An analysis of causality based on 144 countries from around the world, Contemporary Economics, 12, 3, (2018); Diebolt C., Hippe R., The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe, Applied Economics, 51, 5, pp. 542-563, (2019); Drucker J., Goldstein H., Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches, International Regional Sciences Review, 30, 1, pp. 20-46, (2007); Eriksson R.H., Forslund F., How do universities contribute to employment growth? The role of human capital and knowledge bases, European Planning Studies, 22, 12, pp. 2584-2604, (2014); Dual vs unitary systems in higher education, Analytical Report No. 3, (2019); The regional structure of European higher education, Analytical Report No. 1, (2019); Faggian A., McCann P., Human capital and regional development, Handbook of regional growth and development theories, pp. 133-151, (2009); Faggian A., Rajbhandari I., Dotzel K.R., The interregional migration of human capital and its regional consequences: A review, Regional Studies, 51, 1, pp. 128-143, (2017); Fischer M.M., Bartkowska M., Riedl A., Sardavar S., Kunnert A., The impact of human capital on regional labor productivity in Europe, Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 5, pp. 2-97, (2009); Gennaioli N., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Human capital and regional development, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 1, pp. 105-164, (2013); Goddard J., Vallance P., The university and the city, (2013); Goldstein H., Drucker J., The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter?, Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 1, pp. 22-43, (2006); Grossetti M., Eckert D., Ginras Y., Jegou L., Lariviere V., Milard B., Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity. A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007), Urban Studies, 51, 10, pp. 2219-2234, (2013); Hattie J., Marsh H.W., The relationship between research and teaching. A Metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research, 66, pp. 507-542, (1996); Hausman N., University innovation, local economic growth, and entrepreneurship, (2012); Hughes A., Martin B.R., Enhancing Impact, (2012); Karlsson C., Andersson M., The location of industry R&D and the location of university R&D. How are they related?, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No, 38, (2006); Kenney M., Mowery D.C., Public universities and regional growth. Insights from the University of California, (2014); Lane J.E., Johnstone D.B., Measuring higher education’s role in economic development., (2012); Laskowska I., Danska-Borsiak B., The importance of human capital for the economic development of EU regions, Comparative Economic Research, 19, 5, pp. 63-79, (2016); Laursen K., Salter A., Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?, Research Policy, 33, pp. 1201-1215, (2004); Laursen K., Reichstein T., Salter A., Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom, Regional Studies, 45, 4, pp. 507-523, (2011); Lendel I., The impact of research universities on regional economies: The concept of university products, Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 3, pp. 210-230, (2010); Lilles A., Roigas K., How higher education institutions contribute to the growth in regions of Europe?, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1, pp. 65-78, (2017); Liu S., Spillovers from universities: Evidence from the land-grant program, Journal of Urban Economics, 87, pp. 25-41, (2015); Lucas R.E., On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3-42, (1988); Mankiw G., Romer D., Weil D., A contribution to the empirics of economic growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, pp. 407-437, (1992); Mansfield E., Lee J.Y., The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial support, Research Policy, 25, pp. 1047-1058, (1996); Martin B.R., Irvine J., Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy, Research Policy, 12, 2, pp. 61-90, (1983); A new political agreement limits SU spending on foreign students from the EU, (2021); Myklebust J.P., Government to move thousands of study places out of bigger cities, (2021); Nelson R.R., Phelps E.S., Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth, American Economic Review, 56, pp. 69-75, (1966); Nicolaisen J., Citation analysis, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 1, pp. 609-641, (2007); Orlando M.J., Verba M., Weiler S., Universities, agglomeration, and regional innovation, The Review of Regional Studies, 49, pp. 407-427, (2019); Pfister C., Rinawi M., Harhoff D., Backes-Gellner U., Regional effects of applied research: Universities of Applied Sciences and innovation, In Paper Presented to the 12Th EPIP Annual Conference, Bordeaux, (2017); Pinheiro R., Benneworth P., Jones G.A., Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions, (2012); Pinto H., Fernandez-Esquinas M., Uyarra E., Universities and knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions, Regional Studies, 5, pp. 1-19, (2013); Ponds R., van Oort F., Frenken K., Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 2, pp. 231-255, (2009); Rasmussen E., Wright M., How can universities facilitate academic spinoffs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective, Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, pp. 782-799, (2015); Rodriguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R., Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe, Regional Studies, 42, 1, pp. 51-67, (2008); Romer P.M., Increasing returns and long run growth, The Journal of Political Economy, 94, 5, pp. 1002-1037, (1986); Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C., The attenuation of human capital spillovers, Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 2, pp. 373-389, (2008); Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Articulating the “three-missions” in Spanish universities, Research Policy, 43, pp. 1760-1773, (2004); Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Benneworth P., Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university’ structural configuration on third mission performance, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, pp. 206-2018, (2019); Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Uyarra E., Kitagawa F., Understanding the evolution of the entrepreneurial university. The case of English Higher Education institutions, Higher Education Quarterly, 5, (2019); Schubert T., Kroll H., Universities’ effects on regional GDP and unemployment: The case of Germany, Papers in Regional Sciences, 95, 3, pp. 467-489, (2016); Sianesi B., van Reenen J., . A review of the macroeconomic literature, (2000); Siegel D.S., Wright M., Lockett A., The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, pp. 489-504, (2007); Valero A., Van Reenen J., The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe, Economics of Education Review, 68, pp. 53-67, (2019); Varga A., Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity, Journal of Regional Science, 40, 2, (2000); Vertesy D., Annoni P., Nardo M., University systems: Beyond league tables engines of growth or ivory towers?, Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 7, 1, pp. 21-43, (2013)","A. Bonaccorsi; School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, 56122, Italy; email: a.bonaccorsi@gmail.com","","Springer","","","","","","08929912","","","","English","J. Technol. Transf.","Article","Article in press","All Open Access; Green Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85159459761"
"Iqbal A.M.; Kulathuramaiyer N.; Khan A.S.; Abdullah J.; Khan M.A.","Iqbal, Abeda Muhammad (56285408500); Kulathuramaiyer, Narayanan (18042275000); Khan, Adnan Shahid (57212619973); Abdullah, Johari (57206411307); Khan, Mussadiq Ali (57212020496)","56285408500; 18042275000; 57212619973; 57206411307; 57212020496","Intellectual Capital: A System Thinking Analysis in Revamping the Exchanging Information in University-Industry Research Collaboration","2022","Sustainability (Switzerland)","14","11","6404","","","","4","10.3390/su14116404","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85131570458&doi=10.3390%2fsu14116404&partnerID=40&md5=23d9ca76617ff5b1c6a17acecf2ef4ea","Institute of Social Informatics & Technological Innovation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia","Iqbal A.M., Institute of Social Informatics & Technological Innovation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Kulathuramaiyer N., Institute of Social Informatics & Technological Innovation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Khan A.S., Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Abdullah J., Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; Khan M.A., Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia","University-industry research collaboration (UIRC) is a major source for research, innovations and sustainable economic growth. Despite the extensive evidence on the importance of such collaboration in developed and developing countries, literature related to the strengthening of this collaboration, along with its innovation performance, is still scarce. Scholars believe that the impact of exchanging information has a vigorous influence on researcher’s innovative activities as well as research and innovations. Moreover, to flatten the flow of exchanging information between researchers, it is mandatory to refurbish human capital in conjunction with intellectual capital, along with their reinforcing factors i.e., communication and networking, respectively. In this paper, we evaluate the influence of human capital and intellectual capital along with their corresponding reinforcing factors on exchanging information using the system thinking method. Evidence from UIRC in Malaysia provides empirical corroboration that intellectual capital along with its reinforcing factors has a significant influence on exchanging information. Thus, the findings of this research suggest that intensifying the capabilities of intellectual capital with a reinforcing effect can sustain the circulation of exchanging information. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.","communication; human capital; intellectual capital; national innovation system; networking; system thinking; university-industry research collaboration","Malaysia; communication network; human capital; innovation; research work; university sector","","","","","Universiti Malaysia Sarawak","Funding: This research was fully funded by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.","Andres B., Poler R., Guzman E., The Influence of Collaboration on Enterprises Internationalization Process, Sustainability, 14, (2022); Lin J.Y., Yang C.H., Heterogeneity in industry–university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance, Scientometrics, 124, pp. 1-25, (2020); Messeni Petruzzelli A., Murgia G., University—Industry collaborations and international knowledge spillovers: A joint-patent investigation, J. Technol. Transf, 45, pp. 958-983, (2020); Jones S.E., Coates N., A micro-level view on knowledge co-creation through university-industry collaboration in a multi-national corporation, J. Manag. Dev, 39, pp. 723-738, (2020); Ting S.H., Yahya S., Tan C.L., Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis of the Researcher’s Competence in the Formation of University-Industry Collaboration Using Smart PLS, Public Organ. Rev, 20, pp. 249-275, (2020); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Abdullah J., Kulathuramaiye N., Senin A.A., Blended system thinking approach to strengthen the education and training in university-industry research collaboration, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag, 34, pp. 447-460, (2021); Iqbal A.M., Influence of National Innovation System on University-Industry Research Collaboration, (2018); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Bashir F., Senin A.A., Evaluating national innovation system of malaysia based on university-industry research collaboration: A system thinking approach, Asian Soc. Sci, 11, (2015); Parmentola A., Ferretti M., Panetti E., Exploring the university-industry cooperation in a low innovative region. What differences between low tech and high tech industries?, Int. Entrep. Manag. J, 17, pp. 1469-1496, (2021); Tseng F.C., Huang M.H., Chen D.Z., Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance, J. Technol. Transf, 45, pp. 560-577, (2020); Bohin P., Effectiveness of innovative policies to enhance university-industry collaboration in developing countries. Towards technical university-industry links in Ghana, Br. J. Educ, 6, pp. 54-70, (2018); Chen K., Lu W., Wang J., University–industry collaboration for BIM education: Lessons learned from a case study, Ind. High. Educ, 34, pp. 401-409, (2020); Dooley L., Gubbins C., Inter-organisational knowledge networks: Synthesising dialectic tensions of university-industry knowledge discovery, J. Knowl. Manag, 23, pp. 2113-2134, (2019); Brazile T., Hostetter S.G., Donough C.M., Citters D.W., Promoting innovation: Enhancing transdisciplinary opportunities for medical and engineering students, Med. Teach, 40, pp. 1264-1274, (2018); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Senin A.A., Reinforcing the National Innovation System of Malaysia Based on University-Industry Research Collaboration: A System Thinking Approach, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Res, 4, pp. 6-15, (2015); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Iqbal S., Senin A.A., Designing of success criteria-based evaluation model for assessing the research collaboration between university and industry, Int. J. Bus. Res. Manag, 2, pp. 59-73, (2011); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Senin A.A., Determination of high impact evaluation metrics for evaluating the University-industry technological linkage, Int. J. Phys. Soc. Sci, 2, pp. 111-122, (2012); Iqbal S., Iqbal A.M., Shahid A., Senin A.A., A Modern Strategy for the Development of Academic Staff Based on University-Industry Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness& Collaborative Research, Sains Hum, 64, (2013); Chen Y., Han J., Xuan Z., Gao W., Higher education’s role in Chinese national innovation system: A perspective of university-industry linkages, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019, 1, pp. 573-583, (2019); Kafouros M., Wang C., Piperopoulos P., Zhang M., Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions, Res. Policy, 44, pp. 803-817, (2015); Fuentes D.C., Dutrenit G., Best channels of academia-industry interaction for long-term benefit, Res. Policy, 41, pp. 1666-1682, (2012); Iqbal A.M., Khan A.S., Parveen S., Senin A.A., An efficient evaluation model for the assessment of university-industry research collaboration in Malaysia, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol, 10, pp. 298-306, (2015); Freitas I.M.B., Geuna A., Rossi F., Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university– industry interactions, Res. Policy, 42, pp. 50-62, (2013); Razorenov Y.I., Vodenko K.V., Innovative development of the national university system in Russia: Trends and key elements, Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, 41, pp. 253-262, (2021); Melamed-Varela E., Navarro-Vargas L., Blanco-Ariza A.B., Olivero-Vega E., University-Industry-Government linkage to promote innovation at regional systems: Documentary research, Rev. Estud. Reg, 114, pp. 147-169, (2019); Wilson L.E., Gahan M.E., Lennard C., Robertson J., Why do we need a systems thinking approach to military forensic science in the contemporary world?, Aust. J. Forensic Sci, 52, pp. 323-336, (2020); Allender S., Brown A.D., Bolton K.A., Fraser P., Lowe J., Hovmand P., Translating systems thinking into practice for community action on childhood obesity, Obes. Rev, 20, pp. 179-184, (2019); Befus D.R., Lich K.H., Kneipp S.M., Bettger J.P., Coeytaux R.R., Humphreys J.C., A qualitative, systems thinking approach to study self-management in women with migraine, Nurs. Res, 67, pp. 395-403, (2018); Sarriot E., Morrow M., Langston A., Weiss J., Landegger J., Tsuma L., A causal loop analysis of the sustainability of integrated community case management in Rwanda, Soc. Sci. Med, 131, pp. 147-155, (2015); Santos-rodrigues H., Dorrego P.F., Jardon C.F., The influence of human capital on the innovativeness of firms, Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J, 9, pp. 53-63, (2010); Gossling T., Rutten R., Innovation in Regions. European Planning Studies, 15, pp. 253-270, (2007); Esham M., Strategies to develop university-industry linkages in Sri Lanka, Research Studies on Tertiary Education Sector, Study Series 4, (2008); Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D, Manag. Sci, 48, pp. 1-23, (2002); Rebne D., Faculty consulting and scientific knowledge—A traditional university–industry linkage, Educ. Adm. Q, 25, pp. 338-357, (1989); Perkmann M., Walsh K., How firms source knowledge from universities: Partnerships versus contracting (forthcoming), Creating Wealth from Knowledge: Meeting the Innovation Challenge, (2007); Saleh Z., Reforming Public Sector Accounting: Meeting the Challenges of the Knowledge Economy: Exploring Globalization in Accounting Education and Financial Accounting and Reporting, pp. 14-36, (2008); Dodgson M., Mathews J., Kastelle T., Hu M.-C., The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks, Res. Policy, 37, pp. 430-445, (2008); Kaymaz K., Eryigit K.Y., Determining factors hindering university-industry collaboration: An analysis from the perspective of academicians in the context of Entrepreneurial Science Paradigm, Int. J. Soc. Inq, 4, pp. 185-213, (2011); Iqbal A.M., Iqbal S., Khan A.S., Senin A.A., A novel cost efficient evaluation model for assessing research-based technology transfer between university and industry, J. Teknol, 64, (2013); Iqbal A.M., Aslan A.S., Khan A.S., Iqbal S., Research Collaboration Agreements: A Major Risk Factor Between University-Industry Collaboration. An Analysis Approach, Proceedings of the 3rd International Graduate Conference on Engineering, Science and Humanities (IGCESH2010), (2010); Iqbal A.M., Aslan A.S., Khan A.S., Innovation Oriented Constraints between University-industry Technological Collaboration, Proc. ICPE-4, 4, (2010); Schultz T.W., The economic importance of human capital in modernization, Educ. Econ, 1, pp. 13-19, (1993); Marimuthu M., Arokiasamy L., Ismail M., Human Capital Development and Its Impact on Firm Performance: Evidence from Development Economics, J. Int. Soc. Res, 2, pp. 265-272, (2009); Iqbal A.M., Evaluation of Research Collaboration between University-Industry, (2012); Mallana M.F.B.A., Iqbal A.M., Iqbal S., Khan A.S., Senin A.A., The critical factors for the successful transformation of technology from developed to developing countries, J. Teknol, 64, (2013); Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, Eur. Manag. J, 14, pp. 356-364, (1996); Roose G., Pike S., Fernstorm L., Managing Intellectual Capital in Practice, (2005); Subramanian M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the type of innovative capabilities, Acad. Manag. J, 48, pp. 450-463, (2005); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Galbraith J.K., The Affluent Society, 2, (1969); Hu M.-C., Mathews J.A., National innovative capacity in East Asia, Res. Policy, 34, pp. 1322-1349, (2005); Nasierowski W., Arcelus F.J., On the efficiency of national innovation systems, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci, 37, pp. 215-234, (2003); Pan T.-W., Hung S.-W., Lu W.-M., DEA performance measurement of the national innovation system in Asia and Europe, Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res, 27, pp. 369-392, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models, Manag. Decis, 36, pp. 63-76, (1998); Rehman W.U., Rehman C.A., Rehman H.U., Zahid A., Intellectual Capital Performance and Its Impact on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Modaraba Sector of Pakistan, Aust. J. Bus. Manag. Res, 1, pp. 8-16, (2011); Bin Ahmad S., Mushraf A.M., The Relationship between Intellectual capital and Business Performance: An empirical study in Iraqi industry, International Conference on Management and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 104-109, (2011); Chin C.M.M., Yap E.H., Spowage A.C., Project management methodology for university-industry collaborative projects, Rev. Int. Comp. Manag, 12, pp. 901-918, (2011); Hamdan H., Yusof F., Omar D., Abdullah F., Nasrudin N., Abullah I.C., University Industrial Linkages: Relationship Towards Economic Growth and Development in Malaysia, Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng, 5, pp. 1284-1291, (2011); Mora-Valentin E., Montoro-Sanches A., Guerras-Martin L., Determining Factors in the Success of R&D Cooperative Agreements between Firms and Research Organizations, Res. Policy, 33, pp. 17-40, (2004); Lee K., Ohta T., Kakehi K., Formal boundary spanning by industry liaison offices and the changing pattern of university–industry cooperative research: The case of the University of Tokyo, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag, 22, pp. 189-206, (2010); Butcher J., Jeffrey P., A view from the coal face: UK research student perceptions of successful and unsuccessful collaborative projects, Res. Policy, 36, pp. 1239-1250, (2007); Ceci F., Iubatti D., Personal relationships and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach, Res. Policy, 41, pp. 565-579, (2012); Elmuti D., Abebe M., Nicolosi M., An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporations. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, Department of Communication and Journalism, Report to the Mitsubishi International Corporation, J. Workplace Learn, 17, pp. 115-129, (2005); Teece D., Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy, Res. Policy, 15, pp. 285-305, (1986); Baum J.A.C., Calabrese T., Silverman B.S., Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology, Strateg. Manag. J, 21, pp. 267-294, (2000); Miotti L., Sachwald F., Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom?, Res. Policy, 32, pp. 1481-1499, (2003); Mohnen P., Hoareau C., What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2, Manag. Decis. Econ, 24, pp. 133-145, (2003); Kleinknecht A., Reijnen J.O.N., Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study, Res. Policy, 21, pp. 347-360, (1992); Becker W., Dietz J., R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—Evidence for the German manufacturing industry, Res. Policy, 33, pp. 209-223, (2004); Hagedoorn J., Schakenraad J., The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance, Strateg. Manag. J, 15, pp. 291-309, (1994); Powell W.W., Koput K.W., Smith-Doerr L., Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology, Adm. Sci. Q, 41, pp. 116-145, (1996); Mitchell W., Singh K., Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods, Strateg. Manag. J, 17, pp. 169-195, (1996); Ahuja G., The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages, Strateg. Manag. J, 21, pp. 317-343, (2000); Uzzi B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Adm. Sci. Q, 42, pp. 35-67, (1997); Phillips D.C., Burbules N.C., Postpositivism and Educational Research, (2000); Park Y.S., Konge L., Artino A.R., The Positivism Paradigm of Research, Acad. Med, 95, pp. 690-694, (2020); Krejcie R.V., Morgan D.W., Determining sample size for research activities, Educ. Psychol. Meas, 30, pp. 607-610, (1970); Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Gudergan S.P., Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, (2018); Merrill W., Models and Applications in the Decisions Science: Best Papers from the 2015 Annual Conference, (1995); Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Hopkins L., Kuppelwieser V.G., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research, Eur. Bus. Rev, 26, pp. 106-121, (2014); Henseler J., Chin W.W., A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, Struct. Equ. Modeling, 17, pp. 82-109, (2009); Tenenhaus M., Esposito Vinzi V., PLS regression, PLS path modeling and generalized procrustean analysis: A combined approach for multiblock analysis, J. Chemom, 19, pp. 145-153, (2005); Brimble P., Doner R.F., University-Industry Linkages and Economy Development: The case of Thailand, World Dev, 35, pp. 1021-1036, (2007); Xu D., Research on Improving the Technological Innovation Capability of SMEs by University-Industry Collaboration, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev, 6, pp. 100-104, (2013); Li X., Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises, World Dev, 39, pp. 1240-1248, (2011); Azizan S.A., Strengthening Malaysia’s Scientific and Technological Development through Human Capital Development, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci, 91, pp. 648-653, (2013); Alexander C., Yuriy H., Problems and Perspectives of Performance of Higher education institutions in the Development of Russian Innovative System (regional aspect), Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci, 166, pp. 497-504, (2018); Richmond B., System Dynamics Review, Summer-Fall, 10, (1994)","A.M. Iqbal; Institute of Social Informatics & Technological Innovation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Malaysia; email: miabeda@unimas.my","","MDPI","","","","","","20711050","","","","English","Sustainability","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85131570458"
"Lucchese M.; Aversano N.; Di Carlo F.; Polcini P.T.","Lucchese, Manuela (57215876311); Aversano, Natalia (55647167100); Di Carlo, Ferdinando (56924917200); Polcini, Paolo Tartaglia (57200109261)","57215876311; 55647167100; 56924917200; 57200109261","Assessing the intellectual capital and related performance in the teaching process using FES models: First evidence in Italian universities","2020","WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics","17","","","325","344","19","3","10.37394/23207.2020.17.34","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083966557&doi=10.37394%2f23207.2020.17.34&partnerID=40&md5=e81596d53d375a4a2183716c461e9ac6","Department of Economics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Corso Granpriorato di Malta, Capua, CE, Italy; Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano, Potenza, Italy; Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, Fisciano, SA), Italy","Lucchese M., Department of Economics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Corso Granpriorato di Malta, Capua, CE, Italy; Aversano N., Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano, Potenza, Italy; Di Carlo F., Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano, Potenza, Italy; Polcini P.T., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, Fisciano, SA), Italy","Our study provides to define two frameworks of indicators to assess both the Intellectual Capital (IC) employed in the Educational Process in the University sector and the Performance Educational Process reached. The scope is to obtain two tools for measuring, on the one hand, the level and the determinant variables of the IC that represents the input of the Educational Process. On the other hand, the level and the determinant variables of the outcome of the Educational Process. The comparison of the tools scores allows you to understand if at a high level of Educational Performance corresponds to a high level of IC trying to evaluate the ability of the IC to create value. The research questions are answered using a quantitative methodology using the FES models. We define two models to measure the IC Educational Index and Educational Performance. We construct the FES models in compliance with the previous literature on the IC and the theoretical model report of the Intellectual Capital of the Austrian Universities. To define the frameworks of indicators to assess the IC Educational Index and the Educational Performance we use, compliant to the previous literature, the SMA Indicators required by the AVA-MIUR for Italian University Sector. We collected 30 Italian public Universities. Thus, we determined and compared both the IC Educational Index and its determinants and Educational Performance Score and its determinants. Our main result is the construction of two toolboxes to assess the level of IC and the connected Performance of the Educational Process in the University sector. The findings suggest which are the indicators to improve the IC Index or the Educational Performance Score for an in-depth understanding of the value creation process.The paper is novel because it contributes to the literature examining the model to measure both the IC employed in the Educational Process and the Educational Performance. Moreover, comparing the resultant scores, we investigated the relation between input and output in the Educational value creation. © 2020, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society. All rights reserved.","Assessment; Fuzzy; Intellectual Capital; Performance; Teaching Process; University","","","","","","","","Alcaniz L., Gomez-Bezares F., Roslender R., Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward, Accounting Forum, 35, 2, pp. 104-117, (2011); Almqvist R., Skoog M., Colliding discourses? New public management from an intellectual capital perspective, Intellectual Capital Revisited: Paradoxes in the Knowledge Intensive Organization, pp. 100-123, (2007); Altenburger O.A., Novotny-Farkas Z., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Intellectual Capital Reports for Universities – a Trial Intellectual Capital Report at the University of Vienna, (2005); Altenburger O.A., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., The Order on the Intellectual Capital Statements of Austrian Universities – a Critical Analysis, Paper Presented to the 2Nd Workshop on the Process of Reform of University Systems, (2006); Andriessen D., Making Sense of Intellectual Capital, (2004); Andrikopoulos A., The real‐ options approach to intellectual capital analysis: A critique, Knowledge and Process Management, 12, 3, pp. 217-224, (2005); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Binetti P., Cinque M., Valutare l'Università & Valutare in Università. per Una ""Cultura Della Valutazione, (2016); Bini M., Chiandotto B., La Valutazione Del Sistema Universitario Italiano Alla Luce Della Riforma Dei Cicli E Degli Ordinamenti Universitari, Studi E Note Di Economia, 2, pp. 29-61, (2003); Bititci U., Garengo P., Dorfler V., Nudurupati S., Performance measurement challenges for tomorrow, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 3, pp. 305-327, (2012); Bodnar V., Harangozo T., Tirnitz T., Revesz E., Kovats G., Managing intellectual capital in Hungarian Universities – the case of Corvinus University of Budapest, Proceedings of the 2Nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital in Lisbon, Portugal, 2010, pp. 89-126, (2010); Bontis N., Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal of Technology Management, 3, 19, pp. 41-60, (2001); Bozbura F.T., Beskese A., Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44, 2, pp. 124-147, (2007); Calabrese A., Costa R., Menichini T., Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 9, pp. 3747-3755, (2013); Canibano L., Garcia-Ayuso M., Sanchez P., Accounting for intangibles: A literature review, Journal of Accounting Literature, 19, pp. 102-130, (2000); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios De economía Aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Capano G., Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector, Public Administration, 89, 4, pp. 1622-1642, (2011); Chiucchi M.S., Sistemi Di Misurazione E Di Reporting Del Capitale Intellettuale: Criticità E Prospettive, (2004); Chiucchi M.S., Exploring the benefits of measuring intellectual capital. The Aimag case study, Human Systems Management, 27, 3, pp. 217-230, (2008); Chiucchi M.S., Measuring and reporting intellectual capital: Lessons learnt from some interventionist research projects, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 395-413, (2013); Chiucchi M.S., Giuliani M., Marasca S., The use of Intellectual Capital reports: The case of Italy, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 4, (2016); Cong X., Pandya K.V., Issues of knowledge management in the public sector, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 2, pp. 25-33, (2003); Corcoles Y.R., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Corcoles Y.R., Towards improved information disclosure on intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Global Journal of Human Social Science, 12, 5, pp. 1-16, (2012); Corcoles Y.R., Ponce A.T., Vanderdonckt J., How to Respond to Information Needs of University Stakeholders: Proposal of Indicators for Reporting on Intellectual Capital, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 3, 3, pp. 1-2, (2013); Corcoles Y.R., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., An overall index of intellectual capital, Management Research Review, 37, 10, pp. 880-901, (2014); Diakoulakis I.E., Georgopoulos N.B., Koulouriotis D.E., Emiris D.M., Towards a holistic knowledge management model, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 1, pp. 32-46, (2004); Dumay J.C., Intellectual capital measurement: A critical approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 190-210, (2009); Dumay J., Guthrie J., IC and strategy as practice: A critical examination, International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), 3, 4, pp. 28-37, (2012); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: The Proven Way to Establish Your Company's Real Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Edvinsson L., Some perspectives on intangibles and intellectual capital 2000, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 12-16, (2000); Ricardis: Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in Smes, (2006); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a University, Paper Presented at the Conference on Trends in the Management of Human Resources in Higher Education, (2005); Gibbs G., The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching, Quality in Higher Education, 1, 2, pp. 147-157, (1995); Giuliani M., Marasca S., Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: A case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 377-391, (2011); Giuliani M., Chiucchi M.S., Marasca S., A history of intellectual capital measurements: From production to consumption, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 3, pp. 590-606, (2016); Gori E., Quali prospettive dalla ricerca sulla qualità e l’efficacia della scuola per la costruzione di sistemi di accountability dell’istruzione, Non Profit, 2, (2003); Grimaldi M., Cricelli L., Rogo F., A theoretical framework for assessing managing and indexing the intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 4, pp. 501-521, (2013); Guthrie J., Dumay J., New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 258-266, (2015); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-82, (2012); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Hall R., The strategic analysis of intangible resources, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 2, pp. 135-144, (1992); Kahraman C., Onar S.C., Oztaysi B., Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8, 4, pp. 637-666, (2015); Kannan G., Aulbur W.G., Intellectual capital: Measurement effectiveness, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 389-413, (2004); Kim D.Y., Kumar V., A framework for prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in R&D, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 277-293, (2009); Lee S.H., Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7, pp. 4941-4947, (2010); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Magni C.A., Malagoli S., Mastroleo G., An alternative approach to firms’ evaluation: Expert systems and fuzzy logic, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5, 1, pp. 195-225, (2006); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 1469-1930, (2018); Marr B., Measuring and benchmarking intellectual capital, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11, 6, pp. 559-570, (2004); Marr B., Measuring and managing intangible value drivers, Business Strategy Series, 8, 3, pp. 172-178, (2007); Marr B., Moustaghfir K., Defining intellectual capital: A three-dimensional approach, Management Decision, 43, 9, pp. 1114-1128, (2005); Martin-De-Castro G., Delgado-Verde M., Lopez-Saez P., Navas-Lopez J.E., Towards ‘an intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: Origins and nature, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 4, pp. 649-662, (2011); Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles (Intellectual Capital Statements), Vodafone Foundation, Meritum Project, (2002); Minelli E., Rebora G., Turri M., Il Valore dell’università, (2002); Moller K., Intangible and Financial Performance: Causes and Effects, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 224-245, (2009); Mouritsen J., Bukh P.N., Larsen H.T., Johansen M.R., Developing and managing knowledge through intellectual capital statements, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 1, pp. 10-29, (2002); Neumann R., Guthrie J., The corporatization of research in Australian higher education, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 5-6, pp. 721-741, (2002); Parker L., University corporation: Driving redefinition, Critical Perspective on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Pike S., Roos G., Intellectual capital measurement and holistic value approach (HVA), Works Institute Journal (Japan), 42, October November, (2000); Roos G., Roos J., Measuring your company's intellectual performance, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 413-426, (1997); Roos G., Bainbridge A., Jacobsen K., Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool, Strategy & Leadership, 29, 4, pp. 21-26, (2001); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual Capital in Universities. Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: A critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Skoog M., Visualizing value creation through the management control of intangibles, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 4, pp. 487-504, (2003); Sultanova G., Auken V., A holistic system for measuring the performance of teachers and students, Proceedings of the 8Th European Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 271-279, (2016); Sultanova G., Svyatov S., Ussenbayev N., Transmitting competencies at universities in Kazakhstan: Intellectual capital of teachers, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 112-134, (2018); Sveiby K.E., The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, (1997); Sveiby K.E., Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, (2010); University Organisation Amendment Act and Universities of the Arts Organisation Amendment Act, N. 120/2002/9Th August 2002; Ter Bogt H.J., Scapens R.W., Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems, European Accounting Review, 21, 3, pp. 451-497, (2012); Veltri S., Sistemi Di Misurazione Del Capitale Intellettuale d’azienda, (2007); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., La misurazione del capitale intellettuale nel settore universitario., Un Modello Di Analisi Basato Sulla Logica Fuzzy, 3, pp. 241-273, (2011); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Vergauwen P., Bollen L., Oirbans E., Intellectual capital disclosure and intangible value drivers: An empirical study, Management Decision, 45, 7, pp. 1163-1180, (2007); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese Universities: A hybrid fuzzy model application, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2, pp. 1635-1642, (2010); Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 3, pp. 338-353, (1965); Zandi F., Tavana M., A hybrid fuzzy real option analysis and group ordinal approach for knowledge management strategy assessment, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8, 3, pp. 216-228, (2010); Cheng K.W., The Development of a MOOC Course Under Addiein Business Education, WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 16, pp. 84-92, (2019); Wang W.M., Chang H.J., Comparison of Cross-strait Education under New Generation, WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 16, pp. 108-113, (2019); Zimmerman H.J., Practical Applications of Fuzzy Technologies, (1999); Celikyilmaz A., Turksen I.B., Modeling Uncertainty With Fuzzy Logic: With Recent Theory and Applications, (2009)","","","World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society","","","","","","11099526","","","","English","WSEAS Trans. Busi. Econ.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85083966557"
"Veltri S.; Puntillo P.","Veltri, Stefania (54915627800); Puntillo, Pina (36505058000)","54915627800; 36505058000","On intellectual capital management as an evaluation criterion for university managers: a case study","2020","Journal of Management and Governance","24","1","","135","167","32","13","10.1007/s10997-019-09461-5","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85064224046&doi=10.1007%2fs10997-019-09461-5&partnerID=40&md5=c43c0a4f967d091b490e6614ce27008f","Department of Business Administration and Law, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036, CS, Italy","Veltri S., Department of Business Administration and Law, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036, CS, Italy; Puntillo P., Department of Business Administration and Law, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036, CS, Italy","The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether universities performance management systems (PMS), consider intellectual capital (IC) management as a criterion for evaluating their managers. The issue has been addressed investigating the case study of the University of Calabria. The evaluation systems for managers of the University of Calabria were analyzed with a longitudinal approach, investigating two different systems (2012–2014 and 2015–2017). Two qualitative tools were employed: document analysis and semi-structured interviews. From a formal analysis of the evaluation systems for managers of the University of Calabria, it emerges that the reference to IC and its subcomponents is easier to identify within the individual performance component, which reduces its weight switching from the 2012–2014 to 2015–2017 evaluation system. From the analysis of semi-structured interviews, it emerges that the University of Calabria is far from considering IC substantially as a key criterion to evaluate its managers. Focusing on IC will require the development of an IC specific project addressed to make sense of this new object and of the consequent new managerial practices to give sense to IC measurements and diffuse them within the organization. The originality of the paper lies in the novelty of its aim, linking together the evaluation of universities managers, too often clouded by respect for the academicians in managerial roles, and the role of IC management as an evaluation criteria to assess their performance. The paper offers both theoretical contributions to different streams of the literature, namely the IC and PMS and public sector literature and practical contributions, filling the void between the evaluation systems of university managers as provided by theory and the application of these models in practice, a gap especially significant for public organizations. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.","Case study; Intellectual capital; Italian HE sector; Performance management systems (PMS); Public sector; University managers’ evaluation","","","","","","","","Agasisti T., Market forces and competition in university systems: Theoretical reflections and empirical evidence from Italy, International Review of Applied Economics, 23, 4, pp. 463-483, (2009); Allini A., Caldarelli A., Spano R., La disclosure nei Piani della Performance delle università italiane. Intenti simbolici vs approcci sostanziali di legittimazione, Management Control, 1, pp. 37-59, (2017); Alvesson M., Deetz S., Doing critical management research, (2000); Angiola N., Bianchi P., Damato L., Performance management in public universities: Overcoming bureaucracy, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 4, pp. 736-753, (2018); Linee Guida per La Gestione Integrata Del Ciclo Della Performance Delle università Statali Italiane, (2015); Arnaboldi M., Lapsley I., Steccolini I., Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge, Financial Accountability & Management, 31, 1, pp. 1-22, (2015); Aversano N., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., I sistemi di misurazione della performance nelle università: considerazioni critiche sul sistema italiano, Management Control, 1, pp. 15-36, (2017); Aversano N., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Et al., Performance measurement systems in universities: A critical review of the Italian system, Outcome-based performance management in the public sector, pp. 269-287, (2018); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: A literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bowen G.A., Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27-40, (2009); Broadbent J., Laughlin R., Performance management systems: A conceptual model, Management Accounting Research, 20, pp. 283-295, (2009); Bronzetti G., Mazzotta R., Puntillo P., Silvestri A., Veltri S., Intellectual capital reporting practices in the non-profit sector, (2011); Bronzetti G., Veltri S., Intellectual capital in the non-profit sector, (2007); Busetti S., Dente B., Focus on the finger, overlook the moon: The introduction of performance management in the administration of Italian universities, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36, 2, pp. 225-237, (2014); Caldarelli A., Fiondella C., Maffei M., Spano R., Aria M., CEO performance evaluation systems: Empirical findings from the Italian health service, Public Money & Management, 33, 5, pp. 369-376, (2013); Canonico P., Soderlund J., Getting control of multi-project organizations: Combining contingent control mechanisms, International Journal of Project Management, 28, 8, pp. 796-806, (2010); Cantu E., Carbone C., I sistemi di finanziamento: strumenti per governare i comportamenti degli erogatori di prestazioni sanitarie?, Rapporto OASI 2006 sullo stato dell’aziendalizzazione nella sanità italiana, (2007); La grande guida università 2013–2014, (2013); Cepiku D., Hinna A., Scarozza D., Bonomi Savignon A., Performance information use in public administration: An exploratory study of determinants and effects, Journal of Management and Governance, 21, 4, pp. 963-991, (2017); Cosenz F., The ‘entrepreneurial university’: A preliminary analysis of the main managerial and organisational features towards the design of planning & control systems in European academic institutions, Management Research and Practice, 5, 4, pp. 19-36, (2013); Cosenz F., A dynamic viewpoint to design performance management systems in academic institutions: Theory and practice, International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 13, pp. 955-969, (2014); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Lianes D., Leidy P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Dearlove J., The deadly dull issue of university “administration”? Good governance, managerialism and organising academic work, Higher Education Policy, 11, pp. 59-79, (1998); Denzin N.K., The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, (1970); Dumay J., Intellectual capital measurement: A critical approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 190-210, (2009); Dumay J., Reflective discourse about intellectual capital: Research and practice, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 4, pp. 489-503, (2009); Dumay J., Cai L., A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 2, pp. 264-290, (2014); Dumay J., Cai L., Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: A critique, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 121-155, (2015); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: A structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Nielsen C., Intellectual capital management in public universities, The Routledge companion to intellectual capital, (2017); Esposito V., De Nito E., Pezzillo Iacono M., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: The role of performance management systems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 431-450, (2013); RICARDIS (Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research Development and Innovation in Smes). Report to the Commission from the High Level Expert Groups on RICARDIS, (2006); A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, (2020); Connecting universities to regional growth: A practical guide, (2011); Ferreira A., Otley D., The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis, Management accounting research, 20, 4, pp. 263-282, (2009); Gatti M., Chiucchi M.S., Context matters. Il ruolo del contesto negli studi di controllo di gestione, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-10, (2017); Giuliani M., Sensemaking, sensegiving and sensebreaking: The case of intellectual capital measurements, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 218-237, (2016); Gowthorpe C., Wider still and wider? A critical discussion of intellectual capital recognition, measurement and control in a boundary theoretical context, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 7, pp. 823-834, (2009); Guthrie J., Dumay J., New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 258-266, (2015); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-92, (2012); Hood C., The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 2-3, pp. 93-110, (1995); Hopwood A.G., On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8, 2-3, pp. 287-305, (1983); Joslin R., Muller R., Identifying interesting project phenomena using philosophical and methodological triangulation, International Journal of Project Management, 34, pp. 1043-1056, (2016); Kennedy K.J., Higher education governance as a key policy issue in the 21st century, Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2, 1, pp. 55-70, (2003); Kong E., Intellectual capital and non-profit organizations in the knowledge economy: Editorial and introduction to special issue, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 97-106, (2010); Leedy P.D., Ormrod J.E., Practical research: Planning and design, (2013); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J., Nappo F., Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: The case of the University of Bari, Management Decision, (2019); Lucianelli G., University governance at the crossroads: The Italian case, International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2, 2, pp. 20-34, (2013); Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., Human capital loss in an academic performance measurement system, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 53-70, (2018); Martin-Sardesai A., Irvine H., Tooley S., Guthrie J., Organizational change in an Australian university: Responses to a research assessment exercise, The British Accounting Review, 49, 4, pp. 399-412, (2017); Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W., Management control systems, performance measurement, evaluation and incentives, (2006); Mettanen P., Design and implementation of a performance measurement system for a research organization, Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations, 16, 2, pp. 178-188, (2005); Michalak J., Krasodomska J., Rimmel G., Sort J., Trzmielak D., The past, present and future for intellectual capital research: An overview, The Routledge companion to intellectual capital, (2017); Minelli E., Rebora G., Turri M., How can evaluation fail? The case of Italian universities, Quality in Higher Education, 14, 2, pp. 157-173, (2008); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: Ostensive versus performative IC, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Moynihan D.P., Pandey S.K., The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 4, pp. 849-866, (2010); Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., Indagine sulla qualità dei piani della performance nelle università italiane. Quali prospettive per il futuro?, Economia Aziendale Online, 8, 1, pp. 57-68, (2017); Nisio A., Carolis R.D., Losurdo S., Introducing performance management in universities: The case of a university in Southern Italy, International Journal of Management in Education, 12, 2, pp. 132-153, (2018); Nuti S., Seghieri C., Vainieri M., Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: Some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience, Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 1, pp. 59-69, (2013); Methodological guide—Strategic Management of University Research Activities, (2006); Parisi C., The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: An empirical analysis, Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 1, pp. 71-97, (2013); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Prisacaru V., Litvin A., Quality management in the higher education of the Republic of Moldova as a framework for university performance, Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64, 4, pp. 431-446, (2017); Qu S.Q., Dumay J., The qualitative research interview, Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8, 3, pp. 238-264, (2011); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Santos Penalver J.F., Tejada Ponce A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Manzaneque-Lizano M., The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: Empirical evidence from Spanish universities, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 1, pp. 31-44, (2015); Rodriguez Castellanos A., Landeta Rodriguez J., Youlianov Ranguelov S., University R&D&T capital: What types of knowledge drive it?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Rubino F., Puntillo P., Veltri S., Il ruolo dei manager universitari in un’ottica di performance integrata. Analisi di un caso studio, Management Control, 3, pp. 95-122, (2017); Rutherford A., Meier K.J., Managerial goals in a performance-driven system: Theory and empirical tests in higher education, Public Administration, 93, 1, pp. 17-33, (2015); Ryan B., Scapens R., Theobald M., Research method and methodology in finance and accounting, (2002); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: What has been done and what should be done, Journal of intellectual capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Scapens R.W., Doing case study research, The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scenes view of using qualitative research methods, pp. 257-279, (2004); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: A dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Elia G., A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: A case study, Measuring Business Excellence, 18, 3, pp. 23-37, (2014); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli G., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage IC research: A critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: An intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Silverman D., Analyzing talk and text, Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 821-834, (2000); Sveiby K.E., Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, (2010); Teelken C., Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: Comparing three countries, Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 307-323, (2015); (2012); (2013); Veltri S., Bronzetti G., A critical analysis of the intellectual capital measuring, managing, and reporting practices in the non-profit sector: Lessons learnt from a case study, Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 2, pp. 305-318, (2015); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, pp. 175-192, (2014); Welman C., Kruger S.J., Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences, (2001); Yin R.K., Case study research, design and methods, (2003); Yin R.K., Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations, Evaluation, 19, 3, pp. 321-332, (2013)","S. Veltri; Department of Business Administration and Law, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036, Italy; email: stefania.veltri@unical.it","","Springer","","","","","","13853457","","","","English","J. Manage. Gov.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85064224046"
"Secundo G.; De Beer C.; Fai F.M.; Schutte C.S.L.","Secundo, Giustina (8246738300); De Beer, Christle (57190683415); Fai, Felicia M. (8202110600); Schutte, Cornelius S.L. (24923860800)","8246738300; 57190683415; 8202110600; 24923860800","Increasing university entrepreneurialism: qualitative insights from the technology transfer office","2019","Measuring Business Excellence","23","3","","253","268","15","11","10.1108/MBE-02-2019-0015","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85068118869&doi=10.1108%2fMBE-02-2019-0015&partnerID=40&md5=eb219b3ef996426983434c5348d52ecc","Department of Innovation for Engineering, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy; Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Department of Management, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa","Secundo G., Department of Innovation for Engineering, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy; De Beer C., Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Fai F.M., Department of Management, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Schutte C.S.L., Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa","Purpose: Successful promotion of academic entrepreneurship is a determining factor in the pursuit of university entrepreneurialism. This paper aims to illustrate how qualitative data on the performance of the technology transfer office (TTO), based on access to intellectual capital (IC) indicators, can be transformed into a metric to provide insights that assist in strategy development for a university moving towards a more entrepreneurial configuration. Design/methodology/approach: The TTO performance metric takes the form of a self-assessment of access to IC indicators, which are determinants of effectiveness. This study involves the use of the metric through the completion of an online survey and follow-up interviews, to collect and analyse the data. Findings: The performance of 34 TTOs in continental Europe and the UK are measured, and insights into the success of promoting academic entrepreneurship were gained. The qualitative data are studied in detail to illustrate how the university can strategically leverage IC to enhance academic entrepreneurship. Research limitations/implications: This study recommends that the university align the mission statement and organisational structure of the TTO, to enable access to IC. This, in turn, may result in increased academic entrepreneurship activities, which will drive the university towards increased entrepreneurialism. Practical implications: The interpretation of the qualitative data relating to the performance of the TTO, and which factors influence it, aids in understanding the performance of the entrepreneurial university and illustrates, which strategic interventions can be made. Originality/value: Understanding the link between IC, academic entrepreneurship (as encapsulated in the performance of the TTO) and the characteristics of the entrepreneurial university is particularly useful for university management decisions. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Academic entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurial university; Intellectual capital; Performance measurement; Technology transfer office","","","","","","","","Audretsch D.B., Keilbach M., Lehmann E., The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and technological diffusion, University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, pp. 69-91, (2005); Anderson T.R., Daim T.U., Lavoie F.F., Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer, Technovation, 27, 5, pp. 306-318, (2007); Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 1, (2006); Brescia F., Colombo G., Landoni P., Organisational structures of knowledge transfer offices: an analysis of the world’s top-ranked universities, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1, pp. 132-151, (2016); Carayannis E., Del Giudice M., Della Peruta M.R., Managing the intellectual capital within government-university-industry R&D partnerships, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, (2014); Chapple W., Lockett A., Siegel D., Wright M., Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer offices in the U.K.: parametric and non-parametric evidence, Research Policy, 34, 3, pp. 369-384, (2005); Chrisman J.J., Hynes T., Fraser S., Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the university of Calgary, Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 4, pp. 267-281, (1995); Clark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways to Transformation, (1998); The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation, (2018); Di Gregorio D., Shane S., Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, 32, 2, pp. 209-227, (2003); Dillman D.A., Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, (2007); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Needs and constraints analysis of the three dimensions of third mission activities, E3M: European indicators and ranking methodology for university third mission, (2010); Etzkowitz H., Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, Minerva, 21, 2-3, pp. 198-233, (1983); Etzkowitz H., Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university, Research Policy, 32, 1, pp. 109-121, (2003); Etzkowitz H., Innovation lodestar: the entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 122-129, (2016); Faulkner T.W., Applying options thinking to R&D valuation, Research-Technology Management, 39, 3, pp. 50-56, (1996); Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J., Burton R., Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 105-121, (2002); Fitzgerald C., Cunningham J.A., Inside the university technology transfer office: mission statement analysis, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 5, pp. 1235-1246, (2016); Friedman J., Silberman J., University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 1, pp. 17-30, (2003); Gonzalez-Pernia J.L., Kuechle G., Pena-Legazkue I., An assessment of the determinants of university technology transfer, Economic Development Quarterly, 27, 1, pp. 6-17, (2013); Guan J., Zhao Q., The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, pp. 1271-1286, (2013); Guerrero M., Urbano D., The development of an entrepreneurial university, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 1, pp. 43-74, (2012); Guerrero M., Cunningham J.A., Urbano D., Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: an exploratory study of the United Kingdom, Research Policy, 44, 3, pp. 748-764, (2015); Guerrero M., Urbano D., Fayolle A., Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1, pp. 105-131, (2016); Gur U., Oylumlu I.S., Kunday O., Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: future directions, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 161-168, (2016); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-92, (2012); Harmon B., Ardishvili A., Cardozo R., Elder T., Leuthold J., Parshall J., Smith D., Mapping the university technology transfer process, Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 6, pp. 423-434, (1997); Hsu D.W.L., Shen Y.C., Yuan B.J.C., Chou C.Y., Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan, Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 92, pp. 25-39, (2015); Huyghe A., Knockaert M., Wright M., Piva E., Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model, Small Business Economics, 43, 2, pp. 289-307, (2014); Kalar B., Antoncic B., The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries, Technovation, 36, pp. 1-11, (2015); Kirby D.A., Guerrero M., Urbano D., Making universities more entrepreneurial: development of a model, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'administration, 28, 3, pp. 302-316, (2011); Lambert R., Lambert Review of Business-Industry Collaboration, (2003); Libecap G., University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, (2005); Lockett A., Wright M., Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, Research Policy, 34, 7, pp. 1043-1057, (2005); McMillan G.S., Narin F., Deeds D.L., An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology, Research Policy, 29, 1, pp. 1-8, (2000); Markman G.D., Phan P.H., Balkin D.B., Gianiodis P.T., Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2, pp. 241-263, (2005); Muscio A., What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 2, pp. 181-202, (2010); Redford D.T., Fayolle A., Stakeholder Management and the Entrepreneurial University, (2014); Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L., University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 4, pp. 691-791, (2007); Schiuma G., The managerial foundations of knowledge asset dynamics, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7, 4, pp. 290-299, (2009); Schoen A., de la Potterie B.V.P., Henkel J., Governance typology of universities’ technology transfer processes, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 3, pp. 435-453, (2014); Siegel D.S., Waldman D.A., Atwater L.E., Link A.N., Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 1, pp. 111-133, (2003); Secundo G., De Beer C., Passiante G., Measuring university technology transfer efficiency: a maturity level approach, Measuring Business Excellence, 20, 3, pp. 42-54, (2016); Secundo G., De Beer C., Schutte C.S.L., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: the technology transfer offices’ role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM), to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities, Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 229-239, (2017); Shane S.A., Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, (2004); Sideri K., Panagopoulos A., Setting up a technology commercialization office at a non-entrepreneurial university: an insider’s look at practices and culture, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 4, pp. 1-13, (2016); Siegel D.S., Wright M., Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink?, British Journal of Management, 26, 4, pp. 582-595, (2015); Tahvanainen A.J., Hermans R., Making sense of TTO production function: university technology transfer offices as process catalysts, knowledge converters and impact amplifiers, (2011); Thursby J., Kemp S., Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy, 31, 1, pp. 109-124, (2002); Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C., Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 90-104, (2002); Urbano D., Guerrero M., Entrepreneurial universities: socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region, Economic Development Quarterly, 27, 1, pp. 40-55, (2013); Villani E., Rasmussen E., Grimaldi R., How intermediary organizations facilitate university-industry technology transfer: a proximity approach, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, pp. 86-102, (2017); Wood M.S., A process model of academic entrepreneurship, Business Horizons, 54, 2, pp. 153-161, (2011); Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Armstrong J.S., Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 138-153, (2002); Dumay J., 15 Years of the journal of intellectual capital and counting: a manifesto for transformational IC research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 2-37, (2014); Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Healey P., Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, (1998); Kwak Y.H., William C., The Berkeley project management process maturity model: measuring the value of project management, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society EMS, 13-15 August, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 1-5, (2000); Perkmann M., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Brostrom A., D'Este P., Fini R., Geuna A., Grimaldi R., Hughes A., Krabel S., Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university-industry relations, Research Policy, 42, 2, pp. 423-442, (2013)","G. Secundo; Department of Innovation for Engineering, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy; email: giusy.secundo@unisalento.it","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","13683047","","","","English","Measuring Bus. Excellence","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85068118869"
"Cuadrado-Barreto G.","Cuadrado-Barreto, Gabriela (57219237658)","57219237658","Knowledge management at the university: Questionnaire for institutional assessment; [Gestão do conhecimento na universidade: Questionário para a avaliação institucional]; [Gestión del conocimiento en la universidad: Cuestionario para la evaluación institucional]","2020","Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion Superior","11","30","","201","218","17","3","10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2020.30.596","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091880218&doi=10.22201%2fiisue.20072872e.2020.30.596&partnerID=40&md5=735e08f8a88b4d283b2da8d359fd0167","Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico","Cuadrado-Barreto G., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico","Knowledge management (km) in universities is an everyday process. It is important to detect the characteristics of km at universities. This article intends to validate a questionnaire drawn up to assess university knowledge management (Cuestionario para Evaluar la Gestión de Conocimientos de la Universidad, cegcu) through its revision by experts. The inquiry is descriptive, non-experimental, transversal, and the data are examined by means of Cronbach alpha and exploratory factorial analysis, in order to prove the relevance and comprehensibility of the cegcu, that can be considered an instrument able to provide the analysis of the organizational performance of the university. © 2020 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.","Higher education institutions; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Questionnaire; University","","","","","","","","Aerden Axel, Joint programme checklist: inspired by quality assurance, European Consortium for Accreditation in higher education, (2014); Alegre Joaquin, Sengupta Kishore, Lapiedra Rafael, Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech smes industry, International Small Business Journal, 31, 4, pp. 454-470, (2011); Siadat Ali, Sayed Reza Hoveida, Abbaszadeh Mohammad, Moghtadaie Leila, Knowledge creation in universities and some related factors, Journal of Management Development, 31, 8, pp. 845-872, (2012); Badah Ahmad, Relationship between the knowledge management processes and the administrative empowerment with the employees of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research-Jordan, European Scientific Journal, 8, 28, pp. 191-209, (2012); Barney Jay, Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten year retrospective on the resource-based view, Journal of management, 27, 6, pp. 643-650, (2001); Julian Birkinshaw, Nobel Robert, Ridderstrale Jonas, Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure?, Organization Science, 13, 3, pp. 274-289, (2002); Brunner Jose Joaquin, Hurtado Rocio Ferrada, Educación Superior en Iberoamérica: Informe 2011, (2011); Bucheli Victor, Diaz Adriana, Calderon Juan Pablo, Lemoine Pablo, Valdivia Juan Alejandro, Villaveces Jose Luis, Zarama Roberto, Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: an intellectual capital-based approach, Scientometrics, 91, 2, pp. 369-382, (2012); Bueno Eduardo, Rodriguez Pilar, Salmador Maria Paz, Experiencias en medición de capital intelectual en España: El Modelo Intellect, (1999); Bueno Eduardo, Morcillo Patricio, Rodriguez Jesus, Luque Maria Angeles, Cervera Mercedes, Camacho Claudia, Merino Belen, Rivera Cecilia, Rodriguez Oscar, Villanueva Julian, Villar Lidia, Gestión del conocimiento en universidades y organismos públicos de investigación, (2003); Bustillos Elva, La gestión del conocimiento para promover la productividad académica de los institutos tecnológicos en la sociedad del conocimiento, (2012); Velazquez Carrillo, Patricia Lucia, Knowledge management process and technology capacity in a social sciences network research, The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, v, pp. 153-164, (2010); Rusuli Che, Saufi Muhamad, Tasmin Rosmaini, Takala Josu, Hashim Norazlin, A structural equation model of knowledge management practices and library users' satisfaction at malaysian university libraries, The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, pp. 139-153, (2014); Chin Chong, Wei Yee Yen Yuen, Geok Chew Gan, Knowledge sharing of academic staff, Library Review, 63, 3, pp. 203-223, (2014); Cordero Diego, Modelo para gobierno de tecnologías de la información (gti): caso de las universidades cofinanciadas de la zona 6 de la República del Ecuador, (2015); Cuadrado Gabriela, Carrillo Patricia, Los procesos de gestión del conocimiento. El caso de las universidades del Ecuador, xx Congreso internacional de investigación en ciencias administrativas (acacia), (2016); Demchig Bolormaa, Knowledge management capability level assessment of the higher education institutions: Case study from Mongolia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, pp. 3633-3640, (2015); Edvinsson Leif, Malone Michael, El capital intelectual: cómo identificar y calcular el valor de los recursos intangibles de su empresa, (1999); Escobar-Perez Jazmine, Cuervo-Martinez Angela, Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización, Avances en Medición, 6, pp. 27-36, (2008); Garcia-Bellido Rosario, Such Jose Gonzalez, Melia Jesus Jornet, Análisis de fiabilidad, (2010); Houston Don, Paewai Shelley, Knowledge, power and meanings shaping quality assurance in higher education: a systemic critique, Quality in Higher Education, 19, 3, pp. 261-282, (2013); El compromiso social de las universidades de América Latina y el Caribe, (2007); Guidelines for stakeholders of academic rankings, (2015); Karami Siavash, Vafaei Alireza, Australian universities and intelectual capital reporting: case study: The group of eight, Corporate Ownership & Control, 11, 4, pp. 288-295, (2014); Kaziliunas Adolfas, The knowledge management process for implementing quality improvement programs, Informacijos Mokslai/Information Sciences, 62, pp. 97-108, (2012); Kenway Jane, Fahey Johannah, Staying ahead of the game: the globalising practices of elite schools, Globalization, Societies and Education, 12, 2, pp. 177-195, (2014); Konno Noboru, Nonaka Ikujiro, Ogilvy Jay, The mind of the scenario thinker, World Futures, The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70, 1, pp. 44-51, (2014); Konno Noboru, Nonaka Ikujiro, Ogilvy Jay, Scenario planning: the basics, World Futures, The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70, 1, pp. 28-43, (2014); Konno Noboru, Nonaka Ikujiro, Ogilvy Jay, Virtue-based management, World Futures, The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70, 1, pp. 19-27, (2014); Lupton Nathaniel, Beamish Paul, Organizational structure and knowledge-practice diffusion in the mnc, Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 4, pp. 710-727, (2014); Markova Gergana, Ford Cameron, Is money the panacea? Rewards for knowledge workers, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 8, pp. 813-823, (2011); Martin de Castro Gregorio, Intellectual capital and the firm: some remaining questions and prospects, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 3, pp. 239-245, (2014); Mercado Patricia, Sanchez Monica, Sanchez Yesenia, Exploración del capital intelectual en instituciones públicas de educación superior. Un estudio comparativo entre dos universidades mexicanas, (2013); Mercado-Salgado Patricia, Gil-Monte Pedro, Development and initial validation of a survey for intellectual capital in universities, Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 650-658, (2014); Misiunaite-Baciauskiene Egle, Juceviciene Palmira, Universiteto katedros studijų veiklos žinių valdymo proceso raiška, Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 115, pp. 8-24, (2014); Mochales Gerardo, Modelo explicativo de la responsabilidad social corporativa estratégica, (2014); Moreno-Brid Juan Carlos, Ruiz-Napoles Pablo, La educación superior y el desarrollo económico en América Latina, (2009); Najim A., Najim Mohamed Al-Naimi, Alnaji Loay, Impact of intellectual capital on realizing university goals in a sample of Jordanian universities, European Journal of Business and Management, 4, 14, pp. 153-162, (2012); Nava-Rogel Rosa Maria, Mercado-Salgado Patricia, Análisis de trayectoria del capital intelectual en una universidad pública mexicana, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 13, 2, pp. 166-187, (2011); Nava Rosa, Mercado Patricia, Demuner Maria del Rosario, Indicadores de capital intelectual para instituciones públicas de educación superior, El capital intelectual en las organizaciones: una agenda de investigación, pp. 179-203, (2012); Nonaka Ikujiro, Takeuchi Hirotaka, The Knowledge Creating Company, (1995); Activos intangibles, International Financial Reporting Standards (ifrs), (2013); Ordorika Imanol, Sistema de información para la evaluación de la educación superior en México, Revista de la Educación Superior, 43, 171, pp. 5-7, (2014); Ramirez Yolanda, Santos Jesus, Tejada Angel, Demanda de información sobre capital intelectual en las universidades públicas españolas, Cuadernos de Gestión, 12, 1, pp. 83-106, (2012); Yolanda Ramirez, Tejada Angel, Gordillo Silvia, Recognition of intellectual capital importance in the university sector, International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3, 4, pp. 27-41, (2013); Ramirez Yolanda, Tejada Angel, Baidez Agustin, Proposal of indicators for reporting on intellectual capital in universities, Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 355-366, (2013); Yolanda Ramirez, Gordillo Silvia, Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Salleh Kalsom, Learning organization and knowledge management: transfer process of tacit knowledge in public university for academic excellence, Proceedings of The International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning, pp. 347-353, (2014); Sanchez Paloma, Castrillo Rocio, Elena Susana, Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities, International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators. History and New Perspectives, pp. 15-17, (2006); Skjong Rolf, Wentworth Benedikte, Expert judgement and risk perception, (2000); Understanding knowledge societies in twenty questions and answers with the index of knowledge societies, (2005); Vaca Byron, La comunicación en entornos virtuales 2d y 3d. Un análisis con estudiantes del grado de ingeniería, (2015); Von Krogh Georg, Nonaka Ikujiro, Rechsteiner Lise, Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: a review and framework, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1, pp. 240-277, (2012); Wardini Amalia, The ic practice of human capital in a university: an experience from Indonesia, Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 474-483, (2015); Wigmore-Alvarez AmberyMercedesRuiz-Lozano, The United Nations Global Compact Progress Reports as management control instruments for social responsibility at Spanish universities, pp. 1-12, (2014); World Development Indicators 2013, (2013)","G. Cuadrado-Barreto; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico; email: gabrielacuadradobarreto@gmail.com","","Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico","","","","","","20072872","","","","Spanish","Rev. Iberoam. Educ. Super.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85091880218"
"Posada-Arias O.; Avendaño-Ramírez J.; Arias-Pérez J.","Posada-Arias, Orfa (57204646403); Avendaño-Ramírez, Jesenia (57204647832); Arias-Pérez, Jose (57192909652)","57204646403; 57204647832; 57192909652","Intellectual Capital Management and University Research Group Performance: Mediating Effects of Machiavellianism and Organisational Narcissism","2018","Journal of Information and Knowledge Management","17","4","1850047","","","","2","10.1142/S0219649218500478","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056520783&doi=10.1142%2fS0219649218500478&partnerID=40&md5=a21f9a32291de2059479bc42f38139f3","Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Antioquia, No. 52-21, Calle 70, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia","Posada-Arias O., Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Antioquia, No. 52-21, Calle 70, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia; Avendaño-Ramírez J., Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Antioquia, No. 52-21, Calle 70, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia; Arias-Pérez J., Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Antioquia, No. 52-21, Calle 70, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia","The purpose of the present study is to analyse the mediating effects of organisational Machiavellianism and narcissism on the relationship between intellectual capital management (ICM) and university research group performance (URGP). The hypothesis model is tested with a sample of 288 research groups from Colombian public and private universities, since these groups are responsible for producing knowledge in the country. For the data analysis, structural equations by the partial least squares method are used. The study results show that only organisational narcissism has a mediating effect, which is partial. In conclusion, the research group must adopt narcissistic behaviours and practices, which improve the perceptions it has of its members and of its own knowledge and capacities. In this way, the group will achieve greater presence in its knowledge area and academic spaces, which leads to a better exploitation of knowledge assets and to improvements in research group performance (RGP). © 2018 World Scientific Publishing Co.","Intangible assets; knowledge management; knowledge transfer; organisational culture; R&D management","","","","","","","","Abramo G., D'Angelo C., Rosati F., Career advancement and scientic performance in universities, Scientometrics, 98, 2, pp. 891-907, (2014); Aragon-Correa J.A., Garcia-Morales V.J., Cordon-Pozo E., Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 3, pp. 349-359, (2007); Austin E.J., Farrelly D., Black C., Moore H., Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?, Personality and Individual Di® erences, 43, 1, pp. 179-189, (2007); Babic D., Kutlaca D., Z;ivkovic L., Strbac D., Semencenko D., Evaluation of the quality of scientic performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe, Scientometrics, 106, 1, pp. 405-434, (2016); Balaid A., Abd Rozan M.Z., Hikmi S.N., Memon J., Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research, International Journal of Information Management, 36, 3, pp. 451-475, (2016); Banker R.D., Lee S.-Y., Potter G., Srinivasan D., An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance-based compensation plan, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 3, pp. 315-350, (2000); Baron R., Kenny D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986); Berthoin A., Richebe N., A passion for giving, a passion for sharing: Understanding knowledge sharing as gift exchange in academia, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 1, pp. 78-95, (2009); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Science, Technology and Innovation in South America, (2010); Bogdanovic M., Manipulation of human mind as dominant strategy in achieving tax compliance, Romanian Economic and Business Review, 11, 1, pp. 24-50, (2016); Camison C., Villar-Lopez A., Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and rm performance, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1, pp. 2891-2902, (2014); Castellanos A.R., University R&D&T capital: What types of knowledge drive it?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Cheng M.Y., Ho J.S., Lau P.M., Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: A study of Multimedia University Malaysia, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 3, pp. 313-324, (2009); Cohen J., A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1, pp. 155-159, (1992); Modelo de Medición de Grupos de Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico O de Innovación y de Reconocimiento de Investigadores Del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Ano 2015, (2015); Collazo-Reyes F., Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The e® ect on the impact of each country, Scientometrics, 98, 1, pp. 197-209, (2014); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.S., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Corcoles Y.R., Intellectual capital management and reporting in European higher education institutions, Intangible Capital, 9, 1, pp. 1-19, (2013); The Global Innovation Index 2015: E® ective Innovation Policies for Development, (2015); Dahling J.J., Whitaker B.G., Levy P.E., The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale, Journal of Management, 35, 2, pp. 219-257, (2008); Dasborough M.T., Ashkanasy N.M., Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships, The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 5, pp. 615-634, (2002); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Eppler M.J., A process-based classication of knowledge maps and application examples, Knowledge and Process Management, 15, 1, pp. 59-71, (2008); Falk R.F., Miller N.B., A Primer for Soft Modeling, (1992); Francis H., HRM and the beginnings of organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 3, pp. 309-327, (2003); Gomez C.R., Solana V.H., Latin American scientic production and world science: A bibliographic review (1989-2003), Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecolog{a, 28, 1, pp. 43-61, (2005); Graham I., Logan J., Harrison M., Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 1, pp. 13-24, (2006); Hair J.F., Hult G.T., Ringle C., Sarstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2014); Hamedoglu M., Potas N., Organizational narcissism scale (ONS), Engineering Management Research, 1, 2, pp. 53-65, (2012); Hartmann F.G., Maas V.S., Why business unit controllers create budget slack: Involvement in management, social pressure, and Machiavellianism, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22, 2, pp. 27-49, (2010); Henseler J., Hubona G., Ray P.A., Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines, Industrial Management &Data Systems, 116, 1, pp. 2-20, (2016); Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sinkovics R.R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 20, 1, pp. 277-319, (2009); Howell K.E., Annansingh F., Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: A tale of two cultures?, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1, pp. 32-39, (2013); Islam M.A., Ikeda M., Islam M.M., Knowledge sharing behaviour inuences: A study of Information Science and Library Management faculties in Bangladesh, IFLA Journal, 39, 3, pp. 221-234, (2013); Jackson M., Grace D., Machiavelli's echo in management, Management &Organizational History, 8, 4, pp. 400-414, (2013); Johnson W.H., Filippini R., Integration capabilities as mediator of product development practices-performance, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30, 1, pp. 95-111, (2013); Kessler S., Bandelli A., Spector P., Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 8, pp. 1868-1896, (2010); Kianto A., Andreeva T., Pavlov Y., The impact of intellectual capital management on company competitiveness and nancial performance, Knowledge Management Research &Practice, 11, 2, pp. 112-122, (2013); Kyvik S., Olsen T.B., Does the aging of tenured academic sta® a® ect the research performance of universities?, Scientometrics, 76, 3, pp. 439-455, (2008); Larner W., Globalising knowledge networks: Universities, diaspora strategies, and academic intermediaries, Geoforum, 59, pp. 197-205, (2015); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Letina S., Network and actor attribute e® ects on the performance of researchers in two elds of social science in a small peripheral community, Journal of Informetrics, 10, 2, pp. 571-595, (2016); Liu C., The relationship between Machiavellianism and knowledge sharing willingness, Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 3, pp. 233-240, (2008); Lu W.M., Kweh Q.L., Huang C.L., Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance, Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, pp. 201-210, (2014); Luu T., Knowledge sharing and competitive intelligence, Marketing Intelligence &Planning, 32, 3, pp. 269-292, (2014); Manjarres-Henriquez L., Gutierrez-Gracia A., Vega-Jurado J., Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientic productivity, Scientometrics, 76, 3, pp. 561-576, (2008); Marr B., Schiuma G., Neely A., Intellectual capital: Dening key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets, Business Process Management Journal, 10, 5, pp. 551-569, (2004); Masa'Deh R.E., Shannak R., Maqableh M., Tarhini A., The impact of knowledge management on job performance in higher education: The case of the University of Jordan, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30, 2, pp. 244-262, (2017); McFadyen M., Cannella A., Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 5, pp. 735-746, (2004); McGuire D., Hutchings K., A Machiavellian analysis of organisational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 2, pp. 192-209, (2006); Mehra A., Dixon A.L., Brass D.J., Robertson B., The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation, Organization Science, 17, 1, pp. 64-79, (2006); Mohayidin M.G., Azirawani N., Kamaruddin M.N., Margono M.I., The application of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian universities, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 3, pp. 301-312, (2007); Moss G., Krzysztof K., Marion H., Rod G., Knowledge management in higher education: A comparison of individualistic and collectivist cultures, European Journal of Education, 42, 3, pp. 377-394, (2007); Muda M.N., Yusof Z.M., Information and communication technology (ICT) in knowledge sharing practices: Needs for the establishment of repository, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 5, pp. 69-78, (2015); Musarra G., Robson M.J., Katsikeas C.S., The inuence of desire for control on monitoring decisions and performance outcomes in strategic alliances, Industrial Marketing Management, 55, pp. 10-21, (2016); Nevicka B., De Hoogh A., Van Vianen A.E.M., Beersma B., McIlwain D., All i need is a stage to shine: Narcissists' leader emergence and performance, The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 5, pp. 910-925, (2011); O'Boyle J., Forsyth D., Banks G., McDaniel M.A., A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 3, pp. 557-579, (2012); List of OECD Disciplines and Areas of Knowledge According to the Frascati Manual, (2015); Fomentando un Crecimiento Inclusivo de la Productividad en America Latina, (2016); Paloma-Sanchez M., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Peltokangas H., Self-esteem, tenure, and narcissistic leader's performance, Journal of Business and Social Research, 5, 12, pp. 26-39, (2016); Peterson S.J., Galvin B.M., Lange D., CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and rm performance, Personnel Psychology, 65, 3, pp. 565-596, (2012); Podsako P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsako N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5, pp. 879-903, (2003); Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect e® ects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 3, pp. 879-891, (2008); Ramayah T., Yeap J.A., Ignatius J., Assessing knowledge sharing among academics: A validation of the knowledge sharing behavior scale (KSBS), Evaluation Review, 38, 2, pp. 160-187, (2014); Corcoles R.Y., Penalver S.J.F., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Rauthmann J.F., Will T., Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39, 3, pp. 391-403, (2011); Robledo J., From consolidated research groups to dynamic innovation systems: The present challenge of the Colombian scientic and technological development, DYNA, 74, 152, pp. 1-7, (2007); Robson M.J., Katsikeas C.S., Bello D.C., Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity, Organization Science, 19, 4, pp. 647-665, (2008); Rousseau M., Duchon D., Organizational narcissism: Scale development and rm outcomes, Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conict, 19, 1, pp. 165-181, (2015); Said A.-M., Rasdi R.M., Samah B.A., Silong A.D., Sulaiman S., A career success model for academics at Malaysian research universities, European Journal of Training and Development, 39, 9, pp. 815-835, (2015); Sendjaya S., Pekerti A., Hartel C., Hirst G., Butarbutar I., Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality, Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 1, pp. 125-139, (2016); Singh M., Kant R., Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach, International Journal of Management Science, 3, 2, pp. 141-150, (2008); Sturm A., Gross D., Wang J., Yu E., Means-ends based know-how mapping, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 2, pp. 454-473, (2017); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The inuence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Theodosiou M., Kehagias J., Katsikea E., Strategic orientations, marketing capabilities and rm performance: An empirical investigation in the context of frontline managers in service organizations, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 7, pp. 1058-1070, (2012); Tijdink J., Bouter L., Veldkamp C., Machiavellianism Is Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Biomedical Scientists, (2016); Tijdink J., Schipper K., Bouter L., Pont P., How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers, BMJ Open, 6, 2, (2016); Wales W., Patel P., Lumpkin G., In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and rm performance variance, Journal of Management Studies, 50, 6, pp. 1041-1069, (2013); World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Report, 2014-2015, (2015); Wilson D.S., Near D.C., Miller R.R., Individual di® erences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies, Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 3, pp. 203-212, (1998); Xie X., Fang L., Zeng S., Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach, Journal of Business Research, 69, 11, pp. 5210-5215, (2016); Yazdi A.M.T., Mustamil N., Do narcissists and high Machs more empowered? Assessing the relationship between Machiavellianism and narcissism, and psychological empowerment, International Journal of Business, 9, 7, pp. 78-86, (2014); Yi J., A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: Scale development and validation, Knowledge Management Research &Practice, 7, 1, pp. 65-81, (2009); Zangoueinezhad A., Moshabaki A., Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 8, pp. 824-843, (2011); Zettler I., Solga M., Not enough of a \dark"" trait?, Linking Machiavellianism to Job Performance. European Journal of Personality, 27, 6, pp. 545-554, (2013)","J. Arias-Pérez; Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, No. 52-21, Calle 70, Colombia; email: jenrique.arias@udea.edu.co","","World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd","","","","","","02196492","","","","English","J. Inf. Knowl. Manage.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85056520783"
"Arias-Pérez J.; Lozada N.; Henao-García E.","Arias-Pérez, Jose (57192909652); Lozada, Nelson (57200724915); Henao-García, Edwin (57197798307)","57192909652; 57200724915; 57197798307","Intellectual capital management and performance of university research groups in an emerging country, Colombia case; [Gestión del capital intelectual y desempeño de grupos de investigación universitarios en un país emergente. El caso de Colombia]","2019","Informacion Tecnologica","30","4","","181","188","7","4","10.4067/S0718-07642019000400181","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072818880&doi=10.4067%2fS0718-07642019000400181&partnerID=40&md5=2e7a2bbf16b7408d38a7f31476ff6082","Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Departamento de Admón, de Empresas, calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, 13-414, Colombia","Arias-Pérez J., Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Departamento de Admón, de Empresas, calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, 13-414, Colombia; Lozada N., Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Departamento de Admón, de Empresas, calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, 13-414, Colombia; Henao-García E., Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Departamento de Admón, de Empresas, calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín, 13-414, Colombia","The objective of the article is to analyze the relationship between the management of intellectual capital and the performance of university research groups (PURG). A cluster and variance analysis (ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons) was performed to identify differences in significant means with data obtained from a sample of 288 university research groups in Colombia. The results show the existence of three types of groups: leaders, followers and laggards. We find significant differences in the publication of scientific articles among them that have to do with two specific aspects of the management of intellectual capital: i) the systematic evaluation of the competences and knowledge mapping of the group, and ii) the existence of a clear strategy to develop new skills and acquire new knowledge. In conclusion, it is necessary to rethink the traditional approach of intellectual capital for universities, which limits the construction and monitoring of performance indicators. © 2019 Centro de Informacion Tecnologica. All rights reserved.","Intellectual capital management; Performance indicators; Research groups","Benchmarking; Intellectual capital; Performance indicators; Post hoc comparisons; Research groups; Scientific articles; Systematic evaluation; Traditional approaches; University research; Knowledge management","","","","","","","Abramo G., D'Angelo C., Rosati F., Career advancement and scientific performance in universities, Scientometrics, 98, 2, pp. 891-907, (2014); Altenburger O., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., The suitability of intellectual capital reports for the quantitative measurement of overall university performance, Incentives and Performance, pp. 379-396, (2015); Andreeva T., Garanina T., Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 397-412, (2016); Arocena R., Goransson B., Sutz J., Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the developmental university, Technology in Society, 41, pp. 10-20, (2015); Balaid A., Abd M., Hikmi S., Memon J., Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research, International Journal of Information Management, 36, 3, pp. 451-475, (2016); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Blanco-Valbuena C., Bernal-Torres C., Camacho F., Diaz-Olaya M., Industrias creativas y culturales: Estudio desde el enfoque de la gestión del conocimiento, Información Tecnológica, 29, 3, pp. 15-28, (2018); Bontis N., Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 1, pp. 41-60, (2001); Calderon G., Castano G., Generación De Conocimiento En Los Grupos Élite De Investigación En Administración En Colombia, (2014); Calderon G., Aristizabal A., La Generación De Conocimiento En Estrategia Organizacional En Colombia, (2017); Cheng M., Ho J., Lau P., Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: A study of multimedia university Malaysia, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 3, pp. 313-324, (2009); Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences, (1988); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes L., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Eppler M., A process-based classification of knowledge maps and application examples, Knowledge and Process Management, 15, 1, pp. 59-71, (2008); Graham I., Logan J., Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 1, pp. 13-24, (2006); Hair J., Hult T., Ringle C., Sarstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2014); Howell K., Annansingh F., Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: A tale of two cultures?, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1, pp. 32-39, (2013); Kianto A., Andreeva T., Pavlov Y., The impact of intellectual capital management on company competitiveness and financial performance, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11, 2, pp. 112-122, (2013); Kyvik S., Olsen T., Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities?, Scientometrics, 76, 3, pp. 439-455, (2008); Lin C., Edvinsson L., Chen J., Beding T., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in Brazil, Russia, India, China, Korea and South Africa, (2012); Marzo G., Scarpino E., Exploring intellectual capital management in SMEs: An in-depth Italian case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 27-51, (2016); McFadyen A., Cannella A., Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 5, pp. 735-746, (2004); Merino A., Ruiz M., Análisis De Datos Con SPSS 13 Base, (2006); Fomentando Un Crecimiento Inclusivo De La Productividad En América Latina, (2016); Indicadores De Ciencia Y Tecnología Colombia 2016, (2017); Ramayah T., Yeap J., Ignatius J., Assessing knowledge sharing among academics: A validation of the knowledge sharing behavior scale (KSBS), Evaluation Review, 38, 2, pp. 160-187, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Santos J., Tejada A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: Stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Robledo J., From consolidated research groups to dynamic innovation systems: The present challenge of the Colombian scientific and technological development, DYNA, 74, 152, pp. 1-7, (2007); Said A., Rasdi R., A career success model for academics at Malaysian research universities, European Journal of Training and Development, 39, 9, pp. 815-835, (2015); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in european universities: A dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015, (2015)","N. Lozada; Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Departamento de Admón, Medellín, de Empresas, calle 67 No. 53-108, 13-414, Colombia; email: nelson.lozada@udea.edu.co","","Centro de Informacion Tecnologica","","","","","","07168756","","ITECF","","Spanish","Inf Tecnol","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85072818880"
"Iqbal A.; Latif F.; Marimon F.; Sahibzada U.F.; Hussain S.","Iqbal, Amjad (57217390916); Latif, Fawad (57194218400); Marimon, Frederic (6504405453); Sahibzada, Umar Farooq (57204534031); Hussain, Saddam (57208540014)","57217390916; 57194218400; 6504405453; 57204534031; 57208540014","From knowledge management to organizational performance: Modelling the mediating role of innovation and intellectual capital in higher education","2019","Journal of Enterprise Information Management","32","1","","36","59","23","174","10.1108/JEIM-04-2018-0083","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055962831&doi=10.1108%2fJEIM-04-2018-0083&partnerID=40&md5=bf7a0c58554c40f2ffd7e7bdd29912f3","COMSATS Institute of Information Technology – Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan; Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China","Iqbal A., COMSATS Institute of Information Technology – Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan; Latif F., COMSATS Institute of Information Technology – Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan; Marimon F., Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; Sahibzada U.F., Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China; Hussain S., COMSATS Institute of Information Technology – Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effects of knowledge management (KM) enablers on KM processes in research universities and testing the direct relation between KM processes and OP. This study also proposes to examine the mediating role of intellectual capital (IC) and innovation in the relationship between KM processes and performance of universities. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 217 academic and administrative personnel from research universities of Pakistan, the hypothesized relationships were tested through partial least squares structural equation modeling technique. Findings: The results reveal that KM enablers have a significant impact on KM processes. The results also indicate that KM processes influence organizational performance (OP) directly and indirectly through innovation and IC. Practical implications: Findings of this study reinforce the corporate experience of KM and suggest how administrators of research universities and higher educational institutions can promote innovation and IC, which in turn enhance OP. Originality/value: Despite the augmented importance of KM in higher education institutions or research universities, there is a dearth of studies that investigate the interplay of KM, innovation, IC and OP. This is one of the earliest studies that not only empirically investigate the interaction of KM enablers, KM processes and performance of research universities but also shed insights into the existing literature by simultaneously investigating mediating role of IC and innovation in the underlying relationship. © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Knowledge management; Pakistan","","","","","","","","Agostini L., Nosella A., Filippini R., Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 400-418, (2017); Ahmad N., Lodhi M.S., Zaman K., Naseem I., Knowledge management: a gateway for organizational performance, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 3, pp. 859-876, (2015); Akhavan P., Ramezan M., Moghaddam J.Y., Mehralian G., Exploring the relationship between ethics, knowledge creation and organizational performance: case study of a knowledge-based organization, VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 44, 1, pp. 42-58, (2014); Alaarj S., Abidin-Mohamed Z., Bustamam U.S.B.A., Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 2016, pp. 729-738, (2016); Al-Hakim L.A., Hassan S., Core requirements of knowledge management implementation, innovation and organizational performance, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17, 1, pp. 109-124, (2016); Alipour F., Karimi R., Mediation role of innovation and knowledge transfer in the relationship between learning organization and organizational performance, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 19, pp. 144-147, (2011); Al-Kurdi O., El-Haddadeh R., Eldabi T., Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: a systematic review, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31, 2, pp. 226-246, (2018); Allocca M.A., Kessler E.H., Innovation speed in small and medium‐sized enterprises, Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 3, pp. 279-295, (2006); Andreeva T., Garanina T., Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 397-412, (2016); Andreeva T., Kianto A., Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 6, pp. 1016-1034, (2011); Aramburu N., Saenz J., Structural capital, innovation capability, and size effect: an empirical study, Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 3, pp. 307-325, (2011); Asiaei K., Jusoh R., A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance, Management Decision, 53, 3, pp. 668-697, (2015); Azzam A., The effect of knowledge management on incremental product innovation in the Jordanian pharmaceutical industry, (2010); Bock G.W., Zmud R.W., Kim Y.G., Lee J.N., Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 29, 1, pp. 87-111, (2005); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 5-8, pp. 433-462, (1999); Bratianu C., Bejinaru R., Knowledge strategies for increasing IC of universities, Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 34-41, (2017); Buenechea-Elberdin M., Saenz J., Kianto A., Exploring the role of human capital, renewal capital and entrepreneurial capital in innovation performance in high-tech and low-tech firms, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, 3, pp. 369-379, (2017); Cabrera E.F., Bonache J., An expert HR system for aligning organizational culture and strategy, Human Resource Planning, 22, 1, pp. 51-60, (1999); Campbell B.A., Coff R., Kryscynski D., Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital, Academy of Management Review, 37, 3, pp. 376-395, (2012); Chahal H., Bakshi P., Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: role of innovation and organizational learning, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33, 3, pp. 376-399, (2015); Chang T.C., Chuang S.H., Performance implications of knowledge management processes: examining the roles of infrastructure capability and business strategy, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5, pp. 6170-6178, (2011); Chang W.J., Liao S.H., Wu T.T., Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: a case of the automobile industry in Taiwan, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, 3, pp. 471-490, (2017); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: a structural modelling perspective from north Indian universities, International Journal of Educational Development, 56, pp. 52-61, (2017); Chen C.J., Shih H.A., Yang S.Y., The role of intellectual capital in knowledge transfer, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56, 3, pp. 402-411, (2009); Cheng M.Y., Ho J.S.Y., Lau P.M., Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: a study of multimedia university Malaysia, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 3, pp. 313-324, (2009); Chiu C.N., Chen H.H., The study of knowledge management capability and organizational effectiveness in Taiwanese public utility: the mediator role of organizational commitment, SpringerPlus, 5, 1, pp. 1-34, (2016); Cho T., Korte R., Managing knowledge performance: testing the components of a knowledge management system on organizational performance, Asia Pacific Education Review, 15, 2, pp. 313-327, (2014); Choo C.W., Perspectives on managing knowledge in organizations, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 37, 1-2, pp. 205-220, (2003); Dahiyat S.E., An integrated model of knowledge acquisition and innovation: examining the mediation effects of knowledge integration and knowledge application, International Journal of Learning and Change, 8, 2, pp. 101-135, (2015); Dahiyat S.E., Al-Zu'bi Z.B.M., The role of knowledge acquisition in facilitating customer involvement in product development: examining the mediation effect of absorptive capacity, International Journal of Learning and Change, 6, 3-4, pp. 171-206, (2012); Darroch J., Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 3, pp. 101-115, (2005); Davenport T.H., De Long D.W., Beers M.C., Successful knowledge management projects, Sloan Management Review, 39, 2, pp. 43-57, (1998); Donate M.J., de Pablo J.D.S., The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation, Journal of Business Research, 68, 2, pp. 360-370, (2015); Donate M.J., Guadamillas F., An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 2, pp. 134-148, (2015); Du Plessis M., The role of knowledge management in innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 4, pp. 20-29, (2007); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual Capital: Realising Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Fernandes V., (Re)discovering the PLS approach in management science, Management, 15, 1, pp. 101-123, (2012); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, pp. 39-50, (1981); Fullwood R., Rowley J., An investigation of factors affecting knowledge sharing amongst UK academics, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 5, pp. 1254-1271, (2017); Fullwood R., Rowley J., Delbridge R., Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 1, pp. 123-136, (2013); Gharakhani D., Mousakhani M., Knowledge management capabilities and SMEs’ organizational performance, Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4, 1, pp. 35-49, (2012); Gloet M., Terziovski M., Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15, 5, pp. 402-409, (2004); Gold A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H., Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1, pp. 185-214, (2001); Grant R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, S2, pp. 109-122, (1996); Hair J., Sarstedt M., Hopkins L., Kuppelwieser G.V., Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research, European Business Review, 26, 2, pp. 106-121, (2014); Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), (2013); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2006); Haner U.E., Innovation quality – a conceptual framework, International Journal of Production Economics, 80, 1, pp. 31-37, (2002); Hayes A.F., Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium, Communication Monographs, 76, 4, pp. 408-420, (2009); Ho C.T., The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109, 1, pp. 98-117, (2009); Holsapple C.W., Singh M., The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness, Expert Systems with Applications, 20, 1, pp. 77-98, (2001); Holste J.S., Fields D., Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use, Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 1, pp. 128-140, (2010); Hsu I.C., Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: a preliminary test, Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 3, pp. 1316-1326, (2008); Hsu L.C., Wang C.H., Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: the mediating role of dynamic capability, British Journal of Management, 23, 2, pp. 179-205, (2012); Hsu Y.H., Fang W., Intellectual capital and new product development performance: the mediating role of organizational learning capability, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 5, pp. 664-677, (2009); Huang J.W., Li Y.H., The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance, International Journal of Manpower, 30, 3, pp. 285-301, (2009); Imran M.K., Bilal A.R., Aslam U., Rahman U.U., Knowledge management strategy: an organizational change prospective, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30, 2, pp. 335-351, (2017); Inkinen H., Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20, 2, pp. 230-257, (2016); Ismail N.A.M., Welch C., Xu M., Towards a sustainable quality of university research: knowledge sharing, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 2, pp. 168-177, (2015); Jardon C.M., The use of intellectual capital to obtain competitive advantages in regional small and medium enterprises, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 4, pp. 486-496, (2015); Kianto A., Ritala P., Spender J.C., Vanhala M., The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 362-375, (2014); Kline R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (2010); Koohang A., Paliszkiewicz J., Goluchowski J., The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: a research model, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117, 3, pp. 521-537, (2017); Lee H., Choi B., Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, pp. 179-228, (2003); Lee K.C., Lee S., Kang I.W., KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance, Information & Management, 42, 3, pp. 469-482, (2005); Lee P.K., Cheng T.E., Yeung A.C., Lai K.H., An empirical study of transformational leadership, team performance and service quality in retail banks, Omega, 39, 6, pp. 690-701, (2011); Lee V.H., Leong L.Y., Hew T.S., Ooi K.B., Knowledge management: a key determinant in advancing technological innovation?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 6, pp. 848-872, (2013); Li Q., Chang C., The customer lifetime value in Taiwanese credit card market, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 5, pp. 702-710, (2010); Liao C., Wang H.Y., Chuang S.H., Shih M.L., Liu C.C., Enhancing knowledge management for R&D innovation and firm performance: an integrative view, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 14, pp. 3026-3038, (2010); Lin H.F., Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study, International Journal of Manpower, 28, 3-4, pp. 315-332, (2007); Longo M., Mura M., The effect of intellectual capital on employees’ satisfaction and retention, Information & Management, 48, 7, pp. 278-287, (2011); Lopez V.W.B., Esteves J., Acquiring external knowledge to avoid wheel re-invention, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 1, pp. 87-105, (2013); Lopez-Nicolas C., Merono-Cerdan A.L., Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance, International Journal of Information Management, 31, 6, pp. 502-509, (2011); Maria Ruiz-Jimenez J., del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes M., Knowledge combination, innovation, organizational performance in technology firms, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113, 4, pp. 523-540, (2013); Martelo-Landroguez S., Cepeda-Carrion G., How knowledge management processes can create and capture value for firms?, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14, 4, pp. 423-433, (2016); Masa'deh R.E., Obeidat B.Y., Tarhini A., A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and firm performance: a structural equation modelling approach, Journal of Management Development, 35, 5, pp. 681-705, (2016); Masa'deh R.E., Shannak R., Maqableh M., Tarhini A., The impact of knowledge management on job performance in higher education: the case of the University of Jordan, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30, 2, pp. 244-262, (2017); Mazdeh M.M., Hesamamiri R., Knowledge management reliability and its impact on organizational performance: an empirical study, Program, 48, 2, pp. 102-126, (2014); Mills A.M., Smith T.A., Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 1, pp. 156-171, (2011); Muqadas F., Rehman M., Aslam U., Ur-Rahman U., Exploring the challenges, trends and issues for knowledge sharing: a study on employees in public sector universities, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47, 1, pp. 2-15, (2017); Mushtaq R., Bokhari R.H., Knowledge sharing: organizational culture and transformational leadership, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12, 2, pp. 1-9, (2011); Naoreen B., Adeeb M.A., Investigating academic research culture in public sector universities of Pakistan, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2014, pp. 3010-3015, (2014); Ngah R., Ibrahim A.R., The effect of knowledge sharing on organizational performance in small and medium enterprises, Proceedings Knowledge Management 5th International Conference, Knowledge Management: Theory, Research & Practice, pp. 503-508, (2010); Ngah R., Tai T., Bontis N., Knowledge management capabilities and organizational performance in roads and transport authority of Dubai: the mediating role of learning organization, Knowledge and Process Management, 23, 3, pp. 184-193, (2016); Nonaka I., Takeuchi H., The Knowledge Creation Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, (1995); Nonaka I., Krogh G.V., Voelpel S., Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances, Organization Studies, 27, 8, pp. 1179-1208, (2006); Obeidat B.Y., Al-Suradi M.M., Masa'deh R.E., Tarhini A., The impact of knowledge management on innovation: an empirical study on Jordanian consultancy firms, Management Research Review, 39, 10, pp. 1214-1238, (2016); Palacios D., Gil I., Garrigos F., The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries, Small Business Economics, 32, 3, pp. 291-301, (2009); Paliszkiewicz J., Koohang A., Goluchowski J., Horn Nord J., Management trust, organizational trust, and organizational performance: advancing and measuring a theoretical model, Management and Production Engineering Review, 5, 1, pp. 32-41, (2014); Pasha S., Pasha M.A., Innovators knowledge services, (2008); Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 3, pp. 879-891, (2008); Ramachandran S.D., Chong S.C., Wong K.Y., Knowledge management practices and enablers in public universities: a gap analysis, Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30, 2, pp. 76-94, (2013); Ramadan B.M., Dahiyat S.E., Bontis N., Al-dalahmeh M.A., Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 437-462, (2017); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Manzaneque-Lizano M., The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: empirical evidence from Spanish universities, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 1, pp. 31-44, (2015); Ramjeawon P.V., Rowley J., Knowledge management in higher education institutions: enablers and barriers in Mauritius, The Learning Organization, 24, 5, pp. 366-377, (2017); Reychav I., Weisberg J., Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 2, pp. 285-300, (2010); Ribeiro S.X., Nagano M.S., Elements influencing knowledge management in university–business–government collaboration: case studies in national institutes of science and technology, Knowledge and Process Management, 25, 3, pp. 207-219, (2018); Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will S., SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg 2005, (2005); Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., Mitchell R., Gudergan S.P., Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, (2018); Rodriguez-Gomez D., Gairin J., Unravelling knowledge creation and management in educational organisations: barriers and enablers, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 2, pp. 149-159, (2015); Rowley J., Is higher education ready for knowledge management?, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 7, pp. 325-333, (2000); Sadikoglu E., Zehir C., Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: an empirical study of Turkish firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 127, 1, pp. 13-26, (2010); Seleim A., Khalil O., Knowledge management and organizational performance in the Egyptian software firms, International Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 4, pp. 37-66, (2007); Seleim A.A., Khalil O.E., Understanding the knowledge management-intellectual capital relationship: a two-way analysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 4, pp. 586-614, (2011); Serenko A., Bontis N., Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings, Knowledge and Process Management, 11, 3, pp. 185-198, (2004); Serenko A., Bontis N., Booker L., Sadeddin K., Hardie T., A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008), Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 1, pp. 3-23, (2010); Shahzad K., Bajwa S.U., Siddiqi A.F.I., Ahmid F., Raza Sultani A., Integrating Knowledge Management (KM) strategies and processes to enhance organizational creativity and performance: an empirical investigation, Journal of Modelling in Management, 11, 1, pp. 154-179, (2016); Shang S.S., Lin S.F., Wu Y.L., Service innovation through dynamic knowledge management, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109, 3, pp. 322-337, (2009); Sharabati A.A.A., Jawad S.N., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision, 48, 1, pp. 105-131, (2010); Shih K.H., Chang C.J., Lin B., Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 74-89, (2010); Shujahat M., Ali B., Nawaz F., Durst S., Kianto A., Translating the impact of knowledge management into knowledge-based innovation: the neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker satisfaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28, 4, pp. 200-212, (2018); Singh J., Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output, Research Policy, 37, 1, pp. 77-96, (2008); Slater S.F., Mohr J.J., Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 1, pp. 26-33, (2006); Taminiau Y., Smit W., De Lange A., Innovation in management consulting firms through informal knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 1, pp. 42-55, (2009); Tan C.N.L., Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management, Higher Education, 71, 4, pp. 525-556, (2016); Tan C.N.L., Md Noor S., Knowledge management enablers, knowledge sharing and research collaboration: a study of knowledge management at research universities in Malaysia, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21, 2, pp. 251-276, (2013); Tidd J., Bessant J., Pavitt K., Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, (2005); Tiwana A., Knowledge Management Toolkit, (1999); Tseng S.M., Lee P.S., The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27, 2, pp. 158-179, (2014); Valaei N., Nikhashemi S.R., Javan N., Organizational factors and process capabilities in a KM strategy: toward a unified theory, Journal of Management Development, 36, 4, pp. 560-580, (2017); Wang X., Performance measurement in universities: managerial perspective, (2010); Wang Z., Wang N., Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10, pp. 8899-8908, (2012); Wang Z., Sharma P.N., Cao J., From knowledge sharing to firm performance: a predictive model comparison, Journal of Business Research, 69, 10, pp. 4650-4658, (2016); Wang Z., Wang N., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); Wang Z., Wang N., Cao J., Ye X., The impact of intellectual capital–knowledge management strategy fit on firm performance, Management Decision, 54, 8, pp. 1861-1885, (2016); Warden C., New modes of self-description: universities reaction in a changing environment, (2004); Wei C.C., Choy C.S., Yew W.K., Is the Malaysian telecommunication industry ready for knowledge management implementation?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 1, pp. 69-87, (2009); Wong K.K.K., Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS, Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1, pp. 1-32, (2013); Wu W.Y., Chang M.L., Chen C.W., Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation, R&d Management, 38, 3, pp. 265-277, (2008); Yang J., Lai F., Yu L., Harnessing value in knowledge acquisition and dissemination: strategic sourcing in product development, International Journal of Technology Management, 33, 2-3, pp. 299-317, (2005); Yasir M., Majid A., Yasir M., Nexus of knowledge-management enablers, trust and knowledge-sharing in research universities, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9, 3, pp. 424-438, (2017); Youndt M.A., Subramaniam M., Snell S.A., Intellectual capital profiles: an examination of investments and returns, Journal of Management Studies, 41, 2, pp. 335-361, (2004); Zack M., McKeen J., Singh S., Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 6, pp. 392-409, (2009); Zangoueinezhad A., Moshabaki A., The role of structural capital on competitive intelligence, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109, 2, pp. 262-280, (2009); Zheng W., Yang B., McLean G.N., Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management, Journal of Business Research, 63, 7, pp. 763-771, (2010); Aboelmaged M.G., Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: the mediating role of innovation performance, Production Planning & Control, 25, 1, pp. 44-58, (2014); Baron R.M., Kenny D.A., The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., SEM: an introduction, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, pp. 629-686, (2010); Mahdavi Mazdeh M., Hesamamiri R., Knowledge management reliability and its impact on organizational performance: an empirical study, Program, 48, 2, pp. 102-126, (2014); Slater S.F., Issues in conducting marketing strategy research, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 3, 4, pp. 257-270, (1995); Zwain A.A.A., Teong L.K., Othman S.N., Knowledge management processes and academic performance in Iraqi HEIs: an empirical investigation, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2, 6, pp. 273-293, (2012)","F. Latif; COMSATS Institute of Information Technology – Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan; email: kfls_83@hotmail.com","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","17410398","","","","English","J. Enterp. Inf. Manage.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85055962831"
"Rezende J.; Torres A.; Correia A.; Nicolini A.; Bernardes R.","Rezende, José (8904113400); Torres, Adriana (57191838185); Correia, Alexandre (57191839202); Nicolini, Alexandre (56192057600); Bernardes, Rui (57191841229)","8904113400; 57191838185; 57191839202; 56192057600; 57191841229","Integrating enabling contexts and ambidexterity to create intellectual capital faculty's competencies on undergraduate business management programs","2016","Intangible Capital","12","4","","1006","1039","33","5","10.3926/ic.724","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994181154&doi=10.3926%2fic.724&partnerID=40&md5=0e50132ccc957f3f96afb56da70c7074","Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil","Rezende J., Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil; Torres A., Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil; Correia A., Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil; Nicolini A., Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil; Bernardes R., Universidade Unigranrio, Brazil","Purpose: This study aims to discuss a framework to promote ambidexterity through an intentional managed enabling context in order to develop university lecturersï�� competencies and, at last, to improve studentsï�� skills. Design/methodology: A descriptive case study was performed based on literature review and the data collection was done through documentary and field participative research with the PACT working group. The paper reports the stage and maturity of the High Commonality of Themes Project (PACT) on a private Brazilian university in Rio de Janeiro. Consequently, since the faculty shares more qualified knowledge and the syllabus could be realigned without losing epistemological identity, the subjects expect that the students learning process performs on market demanded pragmatic and practical skills. Findings: Findings indicate PACT as a kind of improvement, since it makes possible, balancing Refined Interpolation with Disciplined Extrapolation, to promote the ambidextrous learning through an enabling context, thus allowing specialized lecturers to improve competencies in their core area. Research limitations/implications: As a case study, findings could not be widespread and limitations are related to the initial stages of the PACT implementation. Originality/value: The value and originality of the ambidexterity approach refer to the possibilities it could overlap the bottlenecks that faculty performance generates to students learning effectiveness: non-adherence by the faculty to the discipline they teach (Human Capital); way lecturers interact among courses and one another (Social/Relationship Capital); and development and practicality of the educational guidelines of the course ï�� PPC (Structural Capital).","Ambidexterity; Business Schools; Enabling contexts; Intellectual capital","","","","","","","","Andre M.E.D.A., Estudo de caso em pesquisa e avaliaçao educational, (2005); Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives, (2001); Bartunek J.M., Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic- Practitioner Relationships, Journal of Management, 40, 5, pp. 1181-1201, (2014); Bento F., Padilha N.S., A relaçao de trabalho entre oprofessor e a instituiçao de ensino: Recordando os direitos especiais do professor empregado, (2005); Bireaud A., Os métodos pedagôgicos no ensino superior, (1995); Bloom B.S., Krathwohl D.R., Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain, (1956); Definiçao dos cursos de pós-graduaçao, (1965); Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduaçao em Administraçao, bacharelado, (2005); Referenciais Curriculares Nacionais dos Cursos de Bacharelado e Licenciatura/Secretaria de Educaçao Superior, (2010); (2012); Burns L.R., Stalker G.M., The management of innovation, (1961); Holland J.H., Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, (1975); Choo C.W., The knowing organization: How organization use information for construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions, (1998); Costa S.S.G., Governamentalidade neoliberal, teoria do capital humano e empreendedorismo, Educaçào e realidade, 34, 2, pp. 171-186, (2009); Cunha L.A., Ensino superior e universidade no Brasil, 500 anos de educaçao no Brasil, pp. 151-204, (2003); Czeczko N.G., Mestrado e doutorado - devo fazer?, Arq. Gastroenterol, 46, 1, pp. 4-4, (2009); Day G.S., Schoemaker P.H.H., Peripheral vision: Detecting the weak signals that will make or break jour company, (2006); Edvinsson L., Navegandopela economia do conhecimento, (2003); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Capital intelectual: Descobrindo o valor real de sua empresa pela identificaçao de seus valores internos, (1998); Faste R.A., Ambidextrous Thinking. Innovations in Mechanical Engineering Curricula for the 1990s, (1994); Ginzburg C., Sinais: Raízes de um paradigma indiciário, Mitos, emblemas, sinais: Mofologia e história, (1989); Kahneman D., Rápido e devagar. Duas formas depensar, (2012); Kang S., Snell S.A., Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management, Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1, pp. 65-90, (2009); Khan S., Um mundo uma escola, (2013); Kuran T., The Tenacious Past: Theories of Personal and Collective Conservation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 10, pp. 143-171, (1988); Kurtz D.J., Varvakis D., Estudo das capacidades organizacionais sob a lente da ambidestria: Uma abordagem a partir do ponto de vista estratégico, Navus - Revista de Gestäo e Tecnologia, 3, 2, pp. 152-162, (2013); Lima A.G.B., Melo J.S.S., Faustino J., Braga Filho M.O., Silva S.T., Evidências do clima organizacional e do contexto capacitante na criaçào do conhecimento: Um estudo de caso em uma empresa publica de tecnologia da informaçào e comunicaçào, Revista Negôcios em Projeçào, 2, pp. 27-42, (2011); Lombardia P.G., Stein G., Pin J.R., Politicaspara dirigir a los nuevos profesionales - motivacionesy valores de la generation Y, (2008); Lopes E.G., Fontes Filho J.R., Rezende J.F., Os contextos capacitantes e o processo de criaçao de conhecimento nas organizaçoes: Proposta para um artefato de monitoramento do conhecimento organizacional, Gestäo do conhecimento, capital intelectual e ativos intangiveis: Teorias, métodos e debates sobre a geraçao de valor nas organizaçdes contemporâneas, (2014); March J.G., Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organisation Science, 2, 1, pp. 71-87, (1991); Markides C., In Search of Ambidextrous Professors, Academy of Management Journal, 1, (2007); Markides C., Crossing the Chasm: How to Convert Relevant Research Into Managerially Useful Research, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 1, pp. 121-134, (2011); Meeker J.W., Ambidextrous Education or: How Universities Can Come Unskewed and Learn to Live in the Wilderness, The North American Review, 260, 2, pp. 41-48, (1975); Mesquita C., Lopes R.P., Garcia J.A., Rama M.C.R., Peris-Ortiz M., Garrigos-Simon F.J., et al, Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education: Teachers' Perceptions, Innovation and Teaching Technologies New Directions in Research, Practice and Policy, pp. 51-60, (2014); Nicolini A.M., Torres A.A.G., Macedo P.C.de A., Camara E.C., A correlaçao entre a quantidade de docentes mestres e doutores e o desempenho dos estudantes no ENADE: A realidade do Curso de Administraçào, (2014); Nonaka I., Konno N., The concept of ""Ba"": Building foundation for Knowledge Creation, California Management Review, 40, 3, pp. 40-54, (1998); Palfrey J., Gasser U., Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives, (2008); Panda A., Bringing Academic and Corporate Worlds Closer: We Need Pracademics, Management and Labour Studies, 39, 2, pp. 140-159, (2014); Perrenoud P., A prâtica reflexiva no oficio de professor, Profissionalizaçao e razao pedagôgica, (2002); Ponchirolli O., Capital Humano - Sua importância na gestao estratégica do conhecimento, (2007); Polanyi M., The tacit dimension, (1967); Prieto-Pastor I.M., Martin-Perez V., Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, 5, pp. 589-615, (2015); Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators, Journal of Management, 34, 3, pp. 375-409, (2008); Ranjan J., Tripathi P., A holistic framework for the assessment of faculty, International Journal of Business Information Systems, 7, 2, pp. 181-206, (2011); Rocha A.F., Rocha F.T., Neuroeconomia e processo decisório, (2011); Sandberg J., Tsoukas H., Grasping the Logic of Practice: Theorizing Through Practical Rationality, Academy of Management Review, 36, 2, pp. 338-360, (2011); Shirky C., Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age, (2010); Schumpeter J.A., The Theory of Economic Development, (1934); Setzer V.W., Dado, Informaçao, Conhecimento e Competência, Data Grama Zero - Revista de Ciência da Informaçào, (1999); Stewart T.A., Capital Intellectual. A nova Vantagem Competitiva das Organizaçdes, (1999); Sveiby K.E., A nova riqueza das organizaçoes: Gerenciando e avaliandopatrimônios do conhecimento, (1998); Sveiby K.E., Lloyd T., Managing Knowhow, (1987); Takeuchi H., Nonaka I., Gestào do conhecimento, (2008); Von Krogh G., Ichijo K., Nonaka I., Facilitando a criaçao de conhecimento, (2001); Wilson E.O., Consilience: The unit of knowledge, (1999); Westerman J.W., Perez-Batres L.A., Coffey B.S., Pouder R.W., The relationship between undergraduate attendance and performance revisited: Alignment of student and instructor goals, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9, 1, pp. 49-67, (2011); Yamaoka E.J., Carvalho I.M., Gauthier F.O., Taxonomia Corporativa e Aprendizagem Organizacional: Caminho para a Ambidestria, Anais do Simpósio sobre la Sociedad de la Informaciôn, SSI, 10, (2012); Yin R.K., Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos, (2005); Zuo H., Li Z., Pan M., Ambidextrous Development Model of University Continuing Education in Yunnan Province Based on CRM, Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education - Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 269, pp. 859-868, (2014)","","","OmniaScience","","","","","","20143214","","","","English","Intang. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-84994181154"
"Parshakov P.; Shakina E.A.","Parshakov, Petr (55881045400); Shakina, Elena Anatolievna (55266716300)","55881045400; 55266716300","With or without CU: A comparative study of efficiency of European and Russian corporate universities","2018","Journal of Intellectual Capital","19","1","","96","111","15","16","10.1108/JIC-01-2017-0011","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039750283&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-01-2017-0011&partnerID=40&md5=f42d4032d3a24bfdfa8bf08a57fe6e17","National Research University Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russian Federation","Parshakov P., National Research University Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russian Federation; Shakina E.A., National Research University Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russian Federation","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of efficiency of corporate universities. An efficiency is defined in relative terms: as having relatively better performance in comparison to other companies. Different indicators of performance were employed in order to analyze short-term and long-term efficiency. A comparative analysis of European companies and emerging Russian companies is performed in order to understand if there are country differences in the efficiency of corporate universities. Design/methodology/approach: To avoid potential omitted variable bias, fixed effect within estimator is employed. This estimator enables controlling for a firm-specific time-constant effect which conditions company’s performance and is responsible for other individual traits. The rest of the characteristics are controlled with a proxy, which are traditional for corporate finance studies. Findings: There are contradictory results for the efficiency of a corporate university; for the European companies, a corporate university brings positive effect for the short-term performance, nevertheless, as the authors have found that it destructs value in long term. A company with a corporate university has 70 percent less market value added than an average company. There is a negative short-term synergy while the long-term synergy is positive. The results for the Russian sample are very consistent: corporate universities have negative or neutral effect on the performance. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature about strategic management and human resources management. It addresses the issue on efficiency of corporate universities in companies considering this as one of the key strategic investment in human resource policy. It appears that the corporate university is not a panacea for all companies to develop their human development policy. © 2018, © Emerald Publishing Limited.","Corporate university; Efficiency; Human capital; Intellectual capital; Organizational development","","","","","","Russian Science Foundation, RSF","This study comprises research findings from the Project No. 15-18-20039 supported by the Russian Science Foundation.","Ahangar R.G., The relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: an empirical investigation in an Iranian company, African Journal of Business Management, 5, 1, pp. 88-95, (2011); Allen M., The Corporate University Handbook, (2002); Allen M., McGee P., Measurement and evaluation in corporate universities, New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004, 124, pp. 81-92, (2004); Angrist J.D., Pischke J.-S., Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, (2008); Baltagi B.H., Li Q., A Lagrange multiplier test for the error components model with incomplete panels, Econometric Reviews, 9, 1, pp. 103-107, (1990); Baporikar N., Corporate university edification in knowledge society, International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 5, 2, pp. 125-139, (2014); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Blass E., The rise and rise of the corporate university, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 1, pp. 58-74, (2005); Bontis N., Keow W.C.C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Bontis N., Dragonetti N.C., Jacobsen K., Roos G., The knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources, European Management Journal, 17, 4, pp. 391-402, (1999); Breusch T.S., Pagan A.R., The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies, 47, 1, pp. 239-253, (1980); Dobbs R., Koller T., Measuring long-term performance, The McKinsey Quarterly, 16, pp. 17-27, (2005); El-Tannir A.A., The corporate university model for continuous learning, training and development, Education+Training, 44, 2, pp. 76-81, (2002); Gounko T., Smale W., Who chooses the tune? An analysis of new initiatives in Russian higher education, Higher Education Policy, 19, 3, pp. 319-341, (2006); Grant R.M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33, 3, pp. 114-135, (1991); Hausman J.A., Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 6, pp. 1251-1271, (1978); Heyneman S.P., A comment on the changes in higher education in the former Soviet Union, European Education, 42, 1, pp. 76-87, (2010); Huang C., Wang M.-C., The effects of economic value added and intellectual capital on the market value of firms: an empirical study, International Journal of Management, 25, 4, pp. 722-731, (2008); Kelejian H.H., Two-stage least squares and econometric systems linear in parameters but nonlinear in the endogenous variables, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 334, pp. 373-374, (1971); Lepori B., Kyvik S., The research mission of universities of applied sciences and the future configuration of higher education systems in Europe, Higher Education Policy, 23, 3, pp. 295-316, (2010); Lev B., The inadequate public information on intellectual capital and its consequences, (1999); Lev B., Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting, (2001); Meister J., Corporate Universities: Lessons in Building a World-Class Work Force, (1998); Molodchik M., Shakina E., Barajas A., Metrics for the elements of intellectual capital in an economy driven by knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 2, pp. 206-226, (2014); Molodchik M., Shakina E., Bykova A., Intellectual capital transformation evaluating model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 4, pp. 444-461, (2012); Naidenova I., Parshakov P., Intellectual capital investments: evidence from panel VAR analysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 4, pp. 634-660, (2013); Nixon J.C., Helms M.M., Corporate universities vs higher education institutions, Industrial and Commercial Training, 34, 4, pp. 144-150, (2002); Patrucco A.S., Pellizzoni E., Buganza T., The design process of corporate universities: a stakeholder approach, Journal of Workplace Learning, 29, 4, pp. 304-318, (2017); Salmi J., Evidence-based policies in higher education: data analytics, impact assessment and reporting (overview paper), The European Higher Education Area, pp. 807-813, (2015); Shakina E., Barajas A., The relationship between intellectual capital quality and corporate performance: an empirical study of Russian and European companies, Economic Annals, 57, 192, pp. 79-97, (2012); Shakina E., Barajas A., The contribution of intellectual capital to value creation, Contemporary Economics, 7, 4, pp. 41-56, (2013); Shakina E., Barajas A., Intangible-intensive profile of a company: the key to outperforming, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 721-741, (2015); Shakina E., Molodchik M., Intangible-driven value creation: supporting and obstructing factors, Measuring Business Excellence, 18, 3, pp. 87-100, (2014); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Nations, (1997)","P. Parshakov; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russian Federation; email: parshakov.petr@gmail.com","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85039750283"
"Anggraini F.; El Pebrian D.","Anggraini, Fivi (57205446253); El Pebrian, Darius (57204622415)","57205446253; 57204622415","Perception of lecturers of public and private universities on the importance of university’s intellectual capital: A case study in west sumatra province of indonesia","2021","Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences","42","4","","914","923","9","0","10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.4.27","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85120817346&doi=10.34044%2fj.kjss.2021.42.4.27&partnerID=40&md5=2e7c73014b224f2b25b2a5ff1838bcc9","Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Bung Hatta, West Sumatra, Padang, 25133, Indonesia; Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka, Jasin Campus, Merlimau, Melaka, 77300, Malaysia","Anggraini F., Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Bung Hatta, West Sumatra, Padang, 25133, Indonesia; El Pebrian D., Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka, Jasin Campus, Merlimau, Melaka, 77300, Malaysia","The intellectual capital is an important element that must be managed seriously because it is believed to be able to increase the ranking of a university. This study was conducted to examine the lecturers’ perceptions on the importance of intellectual capital in public and private universities in West Sumatra province of Indonesia. The sampled universities for this study were taken from www.4icu. org website. The Independent Sample t-test was used to test the hypotheses. The findings proved that there was difference on the perception on the importance of intellectual capital between the lecturers in public and private universities in West Sumatra. The public university lecturers gave a better perception of intellectual capital compared to the private university lecturers. In fact, with regards to the individual element of intellectual capital, the lecturers’ perceptions on the relational capital were also different. However, there was no difference in perceptions between the lecturers in public and private universities concerning the human capital and structural capital. © 2021 Kasetsart University.","Human capital; Intellectual capital; Relational capital; Structural capital; University’s performance","","","","","","","","Anggraini F., Ali M. A. H, Aza A. M. K., The role of intellectual capital on public universities performance in Indonesia, Pertanika Journal Social Sciences & Humanities, 26, 4, pp. 2453-2472, (2018); Anggraini F., Ali M. A. H, Aza A. M. K., Competitive advantage as mediating role of intellectual capital and universities performance study in Indonesia, International Journal of Economic and Management, 12, S2, pp. 351-363, (2018); Barbosa S., Vale J., Vale V. T., Branco M. C., Intellectual capital and performance in higher education organizations, TAKE proceedings of the international conference theory and applications in the knowledge economy, (2016); Cadez S., Dimovski V., Groff M. Z., Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 8, pp. 1455-1473, (2017); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Relationship between university performance and dimensions of intellectual capital: An empirical investigation, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 71, pp. 215-232, (2017); Chepchieng M. C., Mbugua S. N., Kariuki M. W., University students’ perception of lecturer-student relationships: A comparative study of public and private universities in Kenya, Educational Research and Reviews, 1, 3, pp. 80-84, (2006); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Duenas L. P. L., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Hejazai R., Ghanbari M., Alipour M., Intellectual, human and structural capital effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q, Knowledge and Process Management, 23, 4, pp. 259-273, (2016); Jones N., Meadow C., Sicilia M. A., Measuring intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8, 2, pp. 113-136, (2009); Khalique M., Shaari J. A. N. b., Isa A. H. b. M., Noridah B. S., Impact of intellectual capital on the organizational performance of Islamic banking sector in Malaysia, Asia Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5, 2, pp. 75-83, (2013); Leitner K. H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian Universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Lu W. M., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modeling, 29, 2, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); Mardiyah A. A., Gudono G., The effect of environmental uncertainty and decentralization on the characteristics of management accounting systems, The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research (IJAR), 4, 1, pp. 1-30, (2001); Mohammadi S., Karupiah P., Quality of work life and academic staff performance: A comparative study in public and private universities in Malaysia, Studies in Higher Education, 45, 6, pp. 1093-1107, (2019); Naidu P., Derani N. E. S., A comparative study on quality of education received by students of private universities versus public universities, Procedia Economic and Finance, 35, 2, pp. 639-666, (2016); Paoloni P., Cesaroni F. M., Demartini P., Relational capital and knowledge transfer in universities, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 1, pp. 185-201, (2019); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions: Operationalizing measurement through a strategic prospective lens, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 355-381, (2019); Pedro E. M., Alves H., Leitao J., In search of intangible connection: Intellectual Capital performance and quality of life in higher education institutions, Higher Education, (2020); Pucci T., Simoni C., Zanni L, Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance, Journal of Management and Governance, 19, 3, pp. 589-616, (2015); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Santos J. F., Tejada A., Intellectual capital in Spanish Public Universities: Stakeholders information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, pp. 356-376, (2011); Sanchez P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Perez S. E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K. H., An intellectual capital framework to measure universities’ third mission activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, C, pp. 229-239, (2017); Shehzad U., Fareed Z., Zulfiqar B., Shahzad F., Latif H. S., The impact of intellectual capital on the performance of universities, European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10, 4, pp. 273-280, (2014); Silvestri A., Veltri S., The intellectual capital report within universities: Comparing experiences, Journal Annal of University of Oradea Economic Science Series, 20, 2, pp. 626-632, (2011); Tjahjadi B., Soewarno N., Astri E., Hariyati H., Does intellectual capital matter in performance management system-organizational performance relationship? Experience of higher education institutions in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 4, pp. 533-554, (2019); Ulum I., Harviana R. R., Zubaidah S., Jati A. W., Intellectual capital disclosure and prospective student interest: An Indonesian perspective, Cogent Business & Management, 6, 1, pp. 1-13, (2019); Urdari C., Farcas T. V., Tiron-Tudor A., Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: the perspective of international rankings, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8, 2, pp. 191-215, (2017); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Linzatti M. S., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2012); Virzcaino A. J., Gutierrez J. S., Barrea M. A. O., Ramos F. C., Intellectual capital in public Universities: Comparative analysis, University of Guadalajara and University of Guayaguil, Global connectivity, knowledge and innovation for sustainability and growth: New paradigms of theory and practice, pp. 131-142, (2016); Wu H. Y., Chen J. K., Chen I. S., Ways to promote valuable innovation: intellectual capital assessment for higher education system, Quall Quant, 46, 1, pp. 1377-1391, (2012); Wahid A. H. D. A., Abu N. A., Latif W. A., Smith M., Corporate governance and intellectual capital: Evidence from public and private universities, Higher Education Studies, 3, 1, pp. 63-78, (2013); Wang Z., Wang X., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); Zlate S., Enache C., The interdependence between human capital and organizational performance in higher education, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 2, pp. 136-143, (2015)","F. Anggraini; Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, West Sumatra, 25133, Indonesia; email: fivianggraini@bunghatta.ac.id","","Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute","","","","","","24523151","","","","English","Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85120817346"
"Paudel K.P.","Paudel, Krishna Prasad (57782506700)","57782506700","The Association of Knowledge Management and Academic Performance in Academia","2023","Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","21","1","","41","58","17","1","10.34190/ejkm.21.1.2462","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161606613&doi=10.34190%2fejkm.21.1.2462&partnerID=40&md5=1181d0f30568bcd08a9ef24b1a12c480","School of Education, Kathmandu University, Lalitpur, Nepal","Paudel K.P., School of Education, Kathmandu University, Lalitpur, Nepal","The usage and practices of knowledge management in higher educational institutions are growing after the development of information and communication technology. Knowledge management in educational institutions is being practiced to enhance academic activities, particularly in innovative change in the research as along with teaching and learning practices. Knowledge management in academia impact on the academic performance of faculty members while conducting academic activities and promoting academic discourses is today’s concern. In this background, this research adopts a quantitative methodology to collect data from the 445 academic staff employed at four universities in Nepal. The factor analysis was used to explore the variables and items associated with knowledge management and academic performance. This process has identified seven processes of knowledge management and four processes of academic performance. The relationship was carried out by using correlation analysis while the multiple regression analysis was used to measure the association of knowledge management and academic performance. The research shows the association between the processes of knowledge management and academic performance. The association and relationship of knowledge management and academic performance matter highly in academia. Furthermore, the knowledge creation process enhances the intellectual capital of every individual which has an impact on the knowledge economy of a society. © The Authors.","Academia; Academic performance; Association; Knowledge management; Model","","","","","","","","Asif R., Merceron A., Ali S. A., Haider N. G., Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining, Computers and Education, 113, 1, pp. 177-194, (2017); Babbie E. R., The practice of social research, (2001); Bartz A. E., Basic statistical concepts, (1999); Bassi L., Harnessing the power of intellectual capital, The Journal of Applied Manufacturing Systems, 9, pp. 29-35, (1998); Best J. W., Kahn J. V., Research in Education, (2006); Bhusry M., Ranjan J., Enhancing the teaching-learning process: a knowledge management approach, International Journal of Educational Management, 26, 3, pp. 313-329, (2012); Campanelli P., Testing survey questions, International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 175-200), (2008); Chumjit S., Knowledge management in higher education in Thailand, (2012); Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K., Research methods in education, (2018); Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S., Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2014); Cranfield D., Knowledge management and higher education: A UK case study using grounded theory, (2011); Creswell J. W., Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach, (2013); Croasmun J., Ostrom L., Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences, Journal of Adult Education, 40, 1, pp. 19-22, (2011); Dalkir K., Knowledge management in theory and practice, (2005); Davenport H. T., Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies, Knowledge and Process Management, 4, 3, pp. 187-208, (1997); Dew J., Xiao J. J., The financial management behavior scale: Development and validation, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22, 1, pp. 43-59, (2011); Edwards J. S., A process view of knowledge management: It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 4, pp. 297-306, (2011); Fairweather J. S., Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life, (1996); Field A., Discovering statistics using SPSS, (2005); Girard J., Girard J., Defining knowledge management: Toward an applied compendium, Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3, 1, pp. 1-20, (2015); Gopal V., Shobha K., Knowledge management in higher education, Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 8, pp. 73-79, (2012); Guzys D., Dickson-Swift V., Kenny A., Threlkeld G., Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics as a useful methodological framework for the Delphi technique, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 10, 2, pp. 62-91, (2015); Hair J.F.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., Multivariate data analysis, (1998); Hilman H., Abubakar A., Strategic talent management and university performance: A theoretical perspective, European Journal of Business and Management, 9, 4, pp. 35-40, (2017); Huck S. W., Reading statistics and research, (2012); National information and communication technology policy, (2015); Lee H. Y., Department chairs’ perceptions of knowledge management strategies in colleges of education: Measurement of performance and importance by organizational factors, (2007); Linstone H. A., Turoff M., The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, (2002); Mao H., Liu S., Zhang J., How the effects of IT and knowledge capability on organizational agility are contingent on environmental uncertainty and information intensity?, Information Development, 31, 4, pp. 358-382, (2015); Maqsood T., Finegan A. D., A knowledge management approach to innovation and learning in the construction industry, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2, 2, pp. 297-307, (2009); Marquardt M. J., Building the learning organization: Achieving strategic advantage through a commitment to learning, (2011); Marsh H. W., Hattie J., The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs?, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 5, pp. 603-641, (2002); McCarthy A. F., Knowledge management: Evaluating strategies and processes used in higher education, (2006); National educational policy, (2019); Higher education policy of Nepal, (2015); National information and communication technology policy, (2000); National information and communication technology policy, (2010); National information and communication technology policy, (2015); Mohamad R., Knowledge management as innovation: Organizational culture factors affecting knowledge management practices in Malaysian Higher Education Administration, (2012); Mohayidin M.G., Azirawani N., Kamaruddin N., Margono M. I., The application of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian universities, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 3, pp. 301-312, (2007); Fourteenth plan (F/Y 2073/074 – 2075/076), (2017); Nonaka I., A dynamic theory of knowledge creation, Organisational Science, 5, 1, pp. 14-37, (1994); Nonaka I., Toyama R., Hirata T., Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm, (2008); Parlby D., The power of knowledge: A business guide to knowledge management, (1997); Patel T. R., Patil A. N., Review of knowledge management in higher education, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4, 11, pp. 2062-2065, (2016); Paudel K. P., Constructing scale on knowledge management: Appreciating standard or self-constructed tools?, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Crossing the Border, 7, 2, pp. 32-43, (2019); Paudel K. P., Knowledge Management Matters by Demographic Variables of Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational Institutions, Journal of Management & Development Economics, 9, 1, pp. 78-90, (2019); Paudel K. P., Level of Knowledge Management among Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational Institution, Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 14, pp. 124-130, (2020); Paudel K.P., Bhattarai P.C., Chalise M., Interdependencies between knowledge management and academic performance in higher educational institutions, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, (2021); Petrides L. A., Nodine T. R., Knowledge management in education: Defining the landscape, (2003); Rummel R. J., Understanding factor analysis, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 4, pp. 444-480, (1967); Santos J. R. A., Cronbach’s alpha: A tool of assessing the reliability scales, Journal of Extension, 37, 2, pp. 1-5, (1999); Santosh S., Panda S., Sharing of knowledge among faculty in a Mega Open University, Open Praxis, 8, 3, pp. 247-264, (2016); Sekaran U., Research methods for business: A skill-building approach, (2003); Shenoy G. V., Madan P., Statistical methods in business and social sciences, (1994); Steinberger E. D., Improving student achievement, (1993); Tan C. N. L., Noor S., Knowledge management enablers, knowledge sharing and research collaboration: A study of knowledge management at research universities in Malaysia, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21, 2, pp. 251-276, (2013); Turyasingura W., Interdependency of knowledge management and organisational learning: The case of higher education institutions in Uganda, (2011); Regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in universities and colleges and measures for the maintenance of standards in higher education, (2010); Watcharadamrongkun S., Predictors and effects of knowledge management in US colleges and schools of pharmacy, (2012); Weisberg H.F., The total survey error approach: A guide to the new science of survey research, (2009); Wiig K. M., Knowledge management methods: Practical approaches to managing knowledge, (1993); Yong A. G., Pearce S., A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory, (2013); Yusoff M. Y. M., Mahmood A. K., Jaafar J., Salak K. K. P., A study of KM process and KM enabler in a Malaysian community college, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 13, 1, (2012); Zwain A. A. A., Lim K. T., Othman S. N., Knowledge management processes and academic performance in Iraqi HEIs: An empirical investigation, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2, 6, pp. 273-293, (2012)","K.P. Paudel; School of Education, Kathmandu University, Lalitpur, Nepal; email: kpaudel.np@gmail.com","","Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited","","","","","","14794411","","","","English","Electron. J. Knowl. Manag.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85161606613"
"Brusca I.; Cohen S.; Manes-Rossi F.; Nicolò G.","Brusca, Isabel (14068574100); Cohen, Sandra (55227748100); Manes-Rossi, Francesca (56246962700); Nicolò, Giuseppe (57195628696)","14068574100; 55227748100; 56246962700; 57195628696","Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities: Do they go hand in hand?","2020","Meditari Accountancy Research","28","1","","51","71","20","32","10.1108/MEDAR-01-2019-0432","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071673076&doi=10.1108%2fMEDAR-01-2019-0432&partnerID=40&md5=c34553ebcf15607d5b66ea4b5cab0928","Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece; University of Napoli, Federico II, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italy","Brusca I., Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Cohen S., Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece; Manes-Rossi F., University of Napoli, Federico II, Napoli, Italy; Nicolò G., Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italy","Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare of the way intellectual capital (IC) is disclosed in the websites of the universities in three European countries to assess the way universities decide to communicate IC to their stakeholders and identify potential patterns and trends. In addition, the relation between the level and the type of IC Web disclosure in universities and academic rankings as a proxy of performance is explored to reveal interrelations. Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on a sample of 128 universities coming from Greece (22), Italy (58) and Spain (48). The websites of the universities are content-analysed to measure the level of IC disclosure. The IC disclosure metrics are then correlated with the academic rankings of the World Ranking. Findings: While the level of IC disclosure among universities and among countries is not homogeneous, human capital and internal capital items are more heavily disclosed compared to external capital items in all three countries. In addition, larger universities in terms of number of students tend to disclose more on IC. Moreover, there is a positive correlation between the level of IC Web disclosure and the academic ranking that challenges the IC disclosure strategies followed by the universities. Originality/value: The paper represents an innovative contribution to the existing literature as it investigates websites to assess the level of IC disclosure provided by universities in a comparative perspective. Furthermore, it analyses the relationship between the online IC disclosure and European universities’ academic rankings and provides evidence on the interaction between the IC disclosure and the ecosystem in which the universities operate contributing to the fourth stage of IC research. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Comparative IC research; IC Web disclosure; Intellectual capital (IC); Universities; University rankings","","","","","","","","Altbach P.G., The dilemmas of ranking, International Higher Education, 42, pp. 1-2, (2006); An Y., Davey H., Eggleton I.R.C., Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 4, pp. 571-585, (2011); Aversano N., Manes-Rossi F., Tartaglia-Polcini P., Et al., Performance measurement systems in universities: a critical review of the Italian system, Outcome-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector, pp. 269-287, (2017); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Citro F., Tommasetti A., Disclosure of university websites: evidence from Italian data, Global Business and Economics Review, 16, 4, pp. 452-471, (2014); A Framework for the Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area, (2005); Cohen S., Manes Rossi F., Caperchione E., Brusca I., Local government administration systems and local government accounting information needs: is there a mismatch?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, (2018); Cormier D., Aerts W., Ledoux M.J., Magnan M., Attributes of social and human capital disclosure and information asymmetry between managers and investors, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'administration, 26, 1, pp. 71-88, (2009); Dumay J., Cai L., A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 2, pp. 264-290, (2014); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Involuntary disclosure of intellectual capital: is it relevant?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 29-44, (2017); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual Capital: Realising Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); RICARDIS: Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research Development and Innovation in SMEs, (2006); Needs and constraints analysis of the three dimensions of third mission activities, E3M: European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission, (2010); Gallego-Alvarez I., Rodriguez-Dominguez L., Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors, Online Information Review, 35, 3, pp. 360-385, (2011); Goebel V., Is the literature on content analysis of intellectual capital reporting heading towards a dead end?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 681-699, (2015); Guthrie J., Petty R., Yongvanich K., Ricceri F., Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 282-293, (2004); Hazelkorn E., Reflections on a decade of global rankings: what we've learned and outstanding issues, European Journal of Education, 49, 1, pp. 12-28, (2014); Katharaki M., Katharakis G., A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis, International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 4-5, pp. 115-128, (2010); Krippendorff K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, the Sage CommText Series, (1980); Laredo P., Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities?, Higher Education Policy, 20, 4, pp. 441-456, (2007); Leitner K.H., Intellectual Capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Curaj A., Elena-Perez S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.A., Zaksa K., A Strategic Approach for Intellectual Capital Management in European Universities: Guidelines for Implementation, (2014); Liu N.C., Cheng Y., The academic ranking of world universities, Higher Education in Europe, 30, 2, pp. 127-136, (2005); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Lukman R., Krajnc D., Glavic P., University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 7, pp. 619-628, (2010); McNay I., From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise, The Changing University?, (1995); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 814-835, (2018); Marginson S., Global university rankings: implications in general and for Australia, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 2, pp. 131-142, (2007); Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., When the investors speak: intellectual capital disclosure and the web 2.0, Management Decision, 55, 9, pp. 1888-1904, (2017); Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles, (2002); Ndou V., Secundo G., Dumay J., Gjevori E., Understanding intellectual capital disclosure in online media big data: an exploratory case study in a university, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 499-530, (2018); Parker L., University corporatisation: driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Pisano S., Lepore L., Lamboglia R., Corporate disclosure of human capital via LinkedIn and ownership structure: an empirical analysis of European companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 102-127, (2017); Pollitt C., Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget?, Public Administration, 87, 2, pp. 198-218, (2009); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Santos Penalver J.F., Tejada Ponce A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Merino E., Manzaneque M., Examining the intellectual capital web reporting by Spanish universities, Online Information Review, (2019); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Castrillo R., Elena S., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities, paper presented at The International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators. History and New Perspectives, (2006); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Dumay J., Passiante G., Intellectual capital in the age of big data: establishing a research agenda, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 242-261, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J.C., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: a critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Striukova L., Unerman J., Guthrie J., Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: evidence from UK companies, The British Accounting Review, 40, 4, pp. 297-313, (2008); Sveiby K.E., The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, (1997); Turri M., The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): a need for governance or legitimacy?, Quality in Higher Education, 20, 1, pp. 64-82, (2014); Urdari C., Farcas T.V., Tiron-Tudor A., Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: the perspective of international rankings, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8, 2, pp. 191-215, (2017); Vandemaele S.N., Vergauwen P.G.M.C., Smits A.J., Intellectual capital disclosure in The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK: a longitudinal and comparative study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 3, pp. 417-426, (2005); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Zhuo H.H., Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model, Measurement, 45, 5, pp. 856-880, (2012); De Santis F., Presti C., The relationship between intellectual capital and big data: a review, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 361-380, (2018)","S. Cohen; Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece; email: scohen@aueb.gr","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","2049372X","","","","English","Meditari Account. Res.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85071673076"
"Soegoto E.S.","Soegoto, Eddy Soeryanto (35070456600)","35070456600","Effect of intellectual capital and turnover intentions on lecturer's performance, student value and loyalty in private universities of West Java","2016","Actual Problems of Economics","176","2","","234","242","8","1","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964847914&partnerID=40&md5=ebb5953f29dffb44186282d9226b4a2c","Indonesian Computer University, Jl. Dipatiukur No. 112-114, Bandung, Indonesia","Soegoto E.S., Indonesian Computer University, Jl. Dipatiukur No. 112-114, Bandung, Indonesia","The aims of this research are the following: 1) description of intellectual capital, turnover intentions, lecturer's performance, student value and loyalty; 2) to test the hypothesis about the effect of intellectual capital on turnover intentions and performance; intellectual capital on student value and loyalty, lecturer's turnover intentions on lecturer's performance, and lecturer's performance on student value and loyalty. The object of this research is private universities in West Java. The method used in this research is survey with testing hypotheses. The researcher uses path analysis as the analysis procedure. The research result shows that: 1) intellectual capital has positive and significant influence on lecturer's turnover intentions and performance; 2) intellectual capital has positive and significant influence on student value and loyalty; 3) lecturer's turnover intention has negative and significant influence on lecturer's performance and student loyalty; 4) lecturer's performance has positive and significant influence on student value and loyalty. © Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto, 2016.","Intellectual capital; Private university; Student loyalty; Turnover intentions","","","","","","","","Ainsworth M., Smith N., Millership A., Managing Performance Managing People: Understanding and Improving Team Performance, (2002); Burr R., Girardi A., Intellectual Capital: More Than The Interaction of Competence x Commitment, Australian Journal of Management, 27, 1, pp. 77-78, (2002); Gomes F.C., Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, (1995); Greenberg J., Baron R.A., Behavior In Organizations Understanding & Managing The Human Side of Work, (1995); Ivancevich J.M., Human Resource Management, (2001); Luthans F., Organizational Behavior, (2000); Mathieu J.E., Zajac D., A Review and Meta-Analysis of The Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequenses of Organizational Commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 94, pp. 171-183, (1990); Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1, pp. 61-65, (1991); Newstrom J.W., Davis K., Organizational Behavior: Human Bahavior At Work, (2002); Porter L.W., The Effect of Job Satisfaction on The Performance of Industrial Relation, Academy of Management Journal, pp. 20-28, (1967); Robbins S.P., Organizational Behavior, (2001); Spencer L.M., Spencer S.M., Competence Work: Model for Superior Performance, (1993); Sutisna D., Total Quality Manajemen di Perguruan Tinggi, (1999); Wall T.D., Corbett M., Martin R., Clegg C., Jackson P.R., Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Work Design, and Performance: A Change Study, Journal Applied Psychology, 75, 6, pp. 691-697, (1990); Wood J., Wallace J., Zeffane R.M., Et al., Organizational Behavior: A Global Perspective, (2001)","","","National Academy of Management","","","","","","19936788","","","","English","Actual Probl. Econ.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84964847914"
"Daraio C.; Iazzolino G.; Laise D.; Coniglio I.M.; Di Leo S.","Daraio, Cinzia (8655852500); Iazzolino, Gianpaolo (12645447000); Laise, Domenico (6507354350); Coniglio, Ilda Maria (57211873714); Di Leo, Simone (57227396000)","8655852500; 12645447000; 6507354350; 57211873714; 57227396000","Meta-choices in ranking knowledge-based organizations","2022","Management Decision","60","4","","995","1016","21","2","10.1108/MD-01-2021-0069","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113308903&doi=10.1108%2fMD-01-2021-0069&partnerID=40&md5=d73580d0490e7c93aa280db0c5cad3bd","Control and Management Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy","Daraio C., Control and Management Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Iazzolino G., Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy; Laise D., Control and Management Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Coniglio I.M., Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy; Di Leo S., Control and Management Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of knowledge visualization and its connection with performance measurement from an epistemological point of view, considering quantification and measurement not just as technical questions but showing their relevant implications on the management decision-making of knowledge-based organizations. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a theoretical contribution that combines two lines of research for identifying the three main meta-choices problems that arise in the multidimensional benchmarking of knowledge-based organizations. The first is the meta-choice problem related to the choice of the algorithm used (Iazzolino et al., 2012; Laise et al., 2015; Daraio, 2017a). The second refers to the choice of the variables to be included in the model (Daraio, 2017a). The third concerns the choice of the data on which the analyses are carried out (Daraio, 2017a). Findings: The authors show the interplay existing among the three meta-choices in multidimensional benchmarking, considering as key performance indicators intellectual capital, including Human Capital, Structural Capital and Relational Capital, and performances, evaluated in financial and non-financial terms. This study provides an empirical analysis on Italian Universities, comparing the ranking distributions obtained by several efficiency and multi-criteria methods. Originality/value: This study demonstrates the difficulties of the “implementation problem” in performance measurement, related to the subjectivity of results of the evaluation process when there are many evaluation criteria, and proposes the adoption of the technologies of humility related to the awareness that we can only achieve “satisficing” results. © 2021, Cinzia Daraio, Gianpaolo Iazzolino, Domenico Laise, Ilda Maria Coniglio and Simone Di Leo.","Efficiency analysis; Intellectual capital; Knowledge visualization; Multi-criteria; Quantification; Universities","","","","","","","","Anthony R.N., The trouble with profit maximization, The Nature and Scope of Management, pp. 47-54, (1966); Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30, 9, pp. 1078-1092, (1984); Bertschi S., Bresciani S., Crawford T., Goebel R., Kienreich W., Lindner M., Moere A.V., What is knowledge visualization? Perspectives on an emerging discipline, IEEE 2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 329-336, (2011); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Brauers W.K.M., Zavadskas E.K., Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16, 1, pp. 5-24, (2010); Carson J., Quantification – affordances and limits, Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2, 1, (2020); Ceballos Martin B.A., MCDM “multi-criteria decision making methods for Crisp data”, R package, (2016); Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 6, pp. 429-444, (1978); Corcoles Y.R., Importance of intellectual capital disclosure in Spanish universities, Intangible Capital, 9, 3, pp. 931-944, (2013); Cyert R.M., March J.G., A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, (1963); Daraio C., A framework for the assessment of research and its impacts, Journal of Data and Information Science, 2, 4, pp. 7-42, (2017); Daraio C., Assessing research and its impacts: the generalized implementation problem and a doubly-conditional performance evaluation model, ISSI 2017 - 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Conference Proceedings, pp. 1546-1557, (2017); Daraio C., Econometric approaches to the measurement of research productivity, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, pp. 633-666, (2019); Daraio C., A framework for the assessment and consolidation of productivity stylized facts, Methodological Contributions to the Advancement of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis, (2020); Daraio C., Simar L., Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications, (2007); Daraio C., Bonaccorsi A., Simar L., Rankings and university performance: a conditional multidimensional approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 244, pp. 918-930, (2015); Daraio C., Simar L., Wilson P.W., Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production, Econometrics Journal, 21, pp. 170-191, (2018); Deprins D., Simar L., Tulkens H., Measuring labor inefficiency in post offices, The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurements, pp. 243-267, (1984); Di Berardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Drucker P.F., Business objectives and survival needs, The Nature and Scope of Management, (1966); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, pp. 168-184, (2016); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital, (1997); Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, European Management Journal, 14, 4, pp. 356-364, (1996); Eppler M.J., What is an effective knowledge visualization? Insights from a review of seminal concepts, Knowledge Visualization Currents, pp. 3-12, (2013); Fauzi M.A., Tan C.N.L., Daud M., Awalludin M.M.N., University rankings: a review of methodological flaws, Issues in Educational Research, (2020); Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 78, (2005); Frutos-Belizon J., Martin-Alcazar F., Sanchez-Gardey G., Conceptualizing academic intellectual capital: definition and proposal of a measurement scale, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 306-334, (2019); Garcia Cascales M.S., Lamata M.T., On rank reversal and TOPSIS method, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56, 5-6, pp. 123-132, (2012); Hwang C.L., Yoon K., Multiple attribute decision making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186, (1981); Iazzolino G., Laise D., Marraro L., Business multicriteria performance analysis: a tutorial, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19, 3, pp. 395-411, (2012); Ibarra-Cisneros M., Hernandez-Perlines F., Rodriguez-Garcia M., Intellectual capital, organisational performance and competitive advantage, European Journal of International Management, 14, 6, pp. 955-975, (2020); Jasanoff S., Technologies of humility, Nature, 450, 7166, (2007); Jensen M.C., Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 2, pp. 235-256, (2002); Johnson W., An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm, International Journal of Technology Management, 18, pp. 562-575, (1999); Kaplan R., Norton D., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, pp. 1-13, (1996); Knorr-Cetina K., Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge, (2003); Kneip A., Simar L., Wilson P.W., Testing hypothesis in nonparametric models of production, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 34, pp. 435-456, (2016); Laise D., Marraro L., Iazzolino G., Metachoice for Benchmarking: a case study, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22, 3, pp. 338-353, (2015); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); March J.G., Business decision making, The Nature and Scope of Management, (1966); March J.G., A preface to understanding how decisions happen in organizations, Organizational Decision Making, (1996); March J.G., Simon H.A., Organizations, (1958); Olcay G.A., Bulu M., Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: a review of university rankings, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 153-160, (2017); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Ramezan M., Intellectual capital and organizational organic structure in knowledge society: how are these concepts related?, International Journal of Information Management, 31, 1, pp. 88-95, (2011); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Penalver J.F., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Corcolez Y., Tejada A., Gordillo S., Recognition of intellectual capital importance in the university sector, International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3, 4, pp. 27-41, (2013); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner H.K., An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 229-239, (2017); Simon H., A behavioural model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp. 99-118, (1955); Simon H.A., Rationality as process and as product of thought, American Economic Review, 68, pp. 1-16, (1978); Simon H.A., Models of bounded rationality, Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, 3, pp. 87-110, (1997); Smith G.V., Parr R.L., Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, (2000); Steward T.A., Your company's most valuable asset: intellectual capital, Fortune, 3, pp. 28-33, (1994); Sveiby K., Den Osynliga Balansräkningen, (1989); Valmorbida S.M.I., Ensslin S.R., Performance evaluation of university rankings: literature review and guidelines for future research, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 14, 4, pp. 479-501, (2017); Vernon M.M., Balas E.A., Momani S., Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review, PloS One, 13, 3, (2018); Vincke P., Multicriteria Decision-Aid, (1992); Young Chu P., Ling Lin Y., Hwa Hsiung H., Yar Liu T., Intellectual capital: an empirical study of ITRI, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 7, pp. 886-902, (2006); Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Antucheviciene J., Zakarevicius A., An optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 122, 6, pp. 3-6, (2012)","G. Iazzolino; Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy; email: gp.iazzolino@unical.it","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","00251747","","","","English","Manage. Decis.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85113308903"
"Chatterji N.; Kiran R.","Chatterji, Niti (57194852542); Kiran, Ravi (22985431500)","57194852542; 22985431500","Relationship between university performance and dimensions of intellectual capital: An empirical investigation","2017","Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research","2017","71","","215","231","16","5","10.14689/ejer.2017.71.12","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85032794619&doi=10.14689%2fejer.2017.71.12&partnerID=40&md5=732f87ebf66de3b14c371d4aebe51b60","LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, Punjab, India; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar University, Patiala Campus, Punjab, India","Chatterji N., LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, Punjab, India; Kiran R., School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar University, Patiala Campus, Punjab, India","Purpose: India is the second largest higher education system in the world and 50% of its population is under 25 years. This demographic advantage can be leveraged only if India has a formidable higher education system. Present study tries to explore the relationship between intellectual capital and university performance across North India with an objective of providing fruitful insights to the policy makers about the areas of focus. Research Method: Quantitative research design was used for the study. Respondents of the study were comprised of faculty members of universities from selected North Indian states. Regression analysis using SPSS was employed to study the relationship between the two dimensions of intellectual capital and university performance. Findings: Findings revealed that universities need to operate in close interactions with government institutions and private industries that help enhance relational capital. Organizational capital emerged as a major dimension that affects university performance. The study gives university policy makers tools in the form of organizational and relational capital that can be leveraged to enhance performance. Implications for Research and Practice: These findings are pertinent for the top management of universities which can focus on strengthening relational capital by building strong relationships with alumni and industry, facilitating consulting and having consistent interactions with stakeholders in order to enhance university performance. Results imply that in addition to relying on teaching expertise and teaching pedagogy, planners need to focus equally or more. © 2017 Ani Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.","Faculty perspective; Organizational capital; Relational capital; University performance","","","","","","","","Alvarez I.G., Dominguez L.R., Sanchez I.M.G., Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: Content and explanatory factors, Online Information Review, 35, 3, pp. 360-385, (2010); Balaji P., Kumar V., Use of web technology in providing information services by south Indian technological universities as displayed on library websites, Library Hi Tech, 29, 3, pp. 470-495, (2011); Bektas C., Tayauova G., A Model Suggestion for Improving the Efficiency of Higher Education: University-Industry Co-operation, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 2270-2274, (2014); Bigliardi B., Dormio A.I., A balanced scorecard approach for R&D: Evidence from a case study, Facilities, 28, 5-6, pp. 278-289, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops, measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Canibano L., Sanchez M.P., Intangibles in universities: Current challenges for measuring and reporting, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Chakrabarti A.K., Santoro M.D., Building social capital and learning environment in university-industry relationships, Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, (2004); Chan D., Lo W., Running Universities as Enterprises: University Governance Changes in Hong Kong, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27, 3, pp. 305-322, (2007); Charles D., Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19, 1, pp. 117-130, (2006); Coates H.R., James R., Baldwin G., A crıtıcal examınatıon of the effects of learnıng management systems on unıversıty teahıng and learnıng, Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19, pp. 19-36, (2005); Datta S., Saad M., Social capital and university-industry-government networks in offshore outsourcing-the case of India, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 6, pp. 741-754, (2008); Dill D., University-industry entrepreneurship: The organization and management of American university technology transfer units, Higher Education, 29, 4, pp. 369-384, (1995); Doctor G., Capturing intellectual capital with an institutional repository at a business school in India, Library Hi Tech, 26, 1, pp. 110-125, (2008); Doctor G., Ramachandran A., DSpace@IBSA: Knowledge sharing in a management institute, VINE, 38, 1, pp. 42-52, (2008); Edgar F., Geare A., Factors influencing university research performance, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 5, pp. 774-792, (2011); Etkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Terra B.R.C., The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29, pp. 313-330, (2000); Finney T.G., Finney R.Z., Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study, Education+Training, 52, 4, pp. 276-291, (2010); Fisher D., Grosjean J.A., Brokers on the boundary: Academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities, Higher Education, 44, 3-4, pp. 449-467, (2002); Gunasekara C., The Third Role of Australian Universities in Human Capital Formation, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26, 3, pp. 329-343, (2004); Huggins R., Johnston A., Stride C., Knowledge networks and universities: Locational and organizational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 24, 7-8, pp. 475-502, (2012); Isaac R.G., Herremans I.M., Kline T.J., Intellectual Capital Management Enablers: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, pp. 373-391, (2009); Jongbloed B., Enders J., Salerno C., Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda, Higher Education, 56, pp. 303-324, (2008); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, Harward Business review, 70, 1, pp. 71-90, (1992); Karathanos D., Karathanos P., Applying the Balanced Scorecard to Education, Journal of Education for Business, 80, 4, pp. 222-230, (2005); Kitson P., Getting the best out of the best: How businesses can use universities to their benefit, Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 7, pp. 282-285, (2004); Koc N., Celik B., The Impact of Number of Students per Teacher on Student Achievement, Global Conference on Contemporary Issues on Education, (2015); Kohli R., Devaraj S., Contribution of institutional DSS to Organizational Performance: Evidence from a longitudinal study, Decision Support Systems, 37, 1, pp. 103-118, (2004); Kuah C.T., Wong K.Y., Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis, Computer Science, 3, pp. 499-506, (2011); Lauring J., Selmer J., Social climate in diverse university departments: The role of internal knowledge sharing, Educational Research, 53, 3, pp. 347-362, (2011); Minguillo D., Thelwall M., Which are the best innovation support infrastructures for universities? Evidence from R&D output and commercial activities, Scientometrics, 102, 1, pp. 1057-1081, (2015); Mondal A., Ghosh S.K., Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 4, pp. 515-530, (2012); Mumtaz S., Abbas Q., An Empirical Investigation of Intellectual Capital Affecting the Performance: A Case of Private Universities in Pakistan, World Applied Sciences Journal, 32, 7, pp. 1460-1467, (2014); Nerdrum L., Erikson T., Intellectual capital: A human capital perspective, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 2, pp. 127-135, (2001); Noor M.A.M., Crossley M., Educational innovation and the knowledge society: Development and issues of the cluster of excellence initiatives in Malaysia, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33, 2, pp. 156-169, (2013); Nyerere J., Friso V., Forums for dialogue between university and industry. A case of Kenyatta University, Kenya and University of Padua, Italy, European Journal of Training and Development, 37, 7, pp. 662-677, (2013); Pratt M., Margaritis D., Coy D., Developing a Research culture in a University faculty, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21, 1, pp. 43-55, (2006); Prescott E.C., Visscher M., Organization Capital, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 3, pp. 446-461, (1980); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities. A dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Syh-Jong J., A study of students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group, Educational Research, 49, 1, pp. 65-81, (2007); Trequattrini R., Lombardi R., Lardo A., Cuozzo B., The Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities on Regional Growth: A Local Intellectual Capital Perspective, Journal of Knowledge Economy, pp. 1-13, (2015); Tsai W., Ghoshal S., Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks, The Academy of Management Journal, 41, 4, pp. 464-476, (1998); Umashankar V., Dutta K., Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: An Indian perspective, International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 1, pp. 54-67, (2007); Utulu S.C., Okoye M.A., Application of social capital theory to Nigerian university web sites, The Electronic Library, 28, 1, pp. 171-183, (2010); Weerts D.J., Cabrera A.F., Sanford T., Beyond Giving: Political Advocacy and Volunteer Behaviors of Public University Alumni, Research in Higher Education, 51, 4, pp. 346-365, (2010); Westlund H., Adam F., Social Capital and Economic Performance: A Metaanalysis of 65 studies, European Planning Studies, 18, 6, pp. 893-919, (2010); Zangoueinezhad A., Moshabaki A., Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 8, pp. 824-843, (2011); Zhang L., Bao W., Sun L., Resources and Research Production in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Analysis of Chinese Universities, 2000-2010, Research in Higher Education, pp. 1-23, (2016)","N. Chatterji; LMT School of Management, Thapar University, Derabassi Campus, India; email: niti.chatterji@thapar.edu","","Ani Publishing","","","","","","1302597X","","","","English","Egitim Arastirmalari Eurasian J. Educ. Res.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85032794619"
"Herli M.; Tjahjadi B.","Herli, Mohammad (57221618183); Tjahjadi, Bambang (57191278873)","57221618183; 57191278873","The role of social media as a voluntary intellectual capital disclosure in universities: Evidence from Indonesia","2022","Intangible Capital","18","2","","247","262","15","0","10.3926/ic.1505","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135253375&doi=10.3926%2fic.1505&partnerID=40&md5=997da9c98f9b735303e5d20dfb84032f","Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Universitas Wiraraja, Indonesia","Herli M., Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia, Universitas Wiraraja, Indonesia; Tjahjadi B., Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia","Purpose: This research explains the influence of social media as a tool for the voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital on university performance. Design/methodology: All universities in Indonesia were analyzed based on the observation of their social media accounts such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube channels after which they were correlated with the university performance. Findings: The results showed that social media can be used as voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital. This was indicated by the positive correlation between the popularity of the universities on social media and their relational capital and institutional performance. However, no impact was found on the number of students but a significant difference was recorded in the use of social media between public and private universities in Indonesia. Research limitations/implications: The data were obtained only from one country and this means there is a need to analyze several other countries with different social media platforms in the future. Practical implications: From a strategic management perspective, this is an opportunity for universities to manage social media effectively in order to increase the popularity of their cyberspace and institutional performance. It is recommended that universities have a special role in managing their social media content in order to be able to develop and manage digital communications effectively as a strategy to improve the performance of institutions. Social implications: Social media plays a vital role in improving an organization’s performance and providing adequate information to stakeholders. This is important because the existence of intangible assets is critical to the survival of a business. Originality/value: This research empirically examines the impact of using social media on publicsector organizations (universities) with a specific focus on its application as a voluntary disclosure tool of intellectual capital. © 2022","Intellectual capital disclosure; Social media; University; Voluntary disclosure","","","","","","","","Abeysekera I., The project of intellectual capital disclosure: Researching the research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 1, pp. 61-75, (2006); Abhayawansa S., Guthrie J., Importance of intellectual capital information: A study of australian analyst reports, Australian Accounting Review, 24, 1, pp. 66-83, (2014); Alhassan A.L., Asare N., Intellectual capital and bank productivity in emerging markets: Evidence from Ghana, Management Decision, 54, 3, pp. 589-609, (2016); Aral S., Dellarocas C., Godes D., Introduction to the Special Issue—Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research, Information Systems Research, 24, 1, pp. 3-13, (2013); Archer-Brown C., Kietzmann J., Strategic knowledge management and enterprise social media, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 6, pp. 1288-1309, (2018); Beck B.B., Petersen J.A., Venkatesan R., Multichannel Data-Driven Attribution Models: A Review and Research Agenda, Marketing Accountability for Marketing and Non-marketing Outcomes (Review of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 153-189, (2021); Beltramino N.S., Garcia-Perez-de-Lema D., Valdez-Juarez L.E., The structural capital, the innovation and the performance of the industrial SMES, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 913-945, (2020); Benneworth P., Cunha J., Universities’ contributions to social innovation: Reflections in theory & practice, European Journal of Innovation Management, 18, 4, pp. 508-527, (2015); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities: Do they go hand in hand?, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, pp. 51-71, (2019); Bryl L., Fijalkowska J., Hadro D., Intellectual capital disclosure on Twitter – empirical evidence from the world’s largest companies, Meditari Accountancy Research, (2021); Bujor A., Avsilcai S., Modern technologies and business performance in creative industries: A framework of analysis, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 145, 6, pp. 1-7, (2016); Castellanos A.R., Rodriguez J.L., Ranguelov S.Y., University R&D&T capital: What types of knowledge drive it?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 478-499, (2004); Corcoles Y.R., Importance of intellectual capital disclosure in Spanish universities, Intangible Capital, 9, 3, pp. 931-944, (2013); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: A structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Dal Mas F., Paoloni P., A relational capital perspective on social sustainability; the case of female entrepreneurship in Italy, Measuring Business Excellence, 24, 1, pp. 114-130, (2020); Dewi I.D.A.N.S., Ratnadi N.M.D., Rasmini N.K., Yasa G.W., The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Disclosure on Firm Value, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11, 8, pp. 1328-1336, (2021); Dolega L., Rowe F., Branagan E., Going digital? The impact of social media marketing on retail website traffic, orders and sales, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, (2021); Donaldson T., Preston L.E., The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 20, 1, pp. 65-91, (1995); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Involuntary disclosure of intellectual capital: Is it relevant?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 29-44, (2017); Eger L., Egerova D., Tomczyk L., Kryston M., How Universities Communicate with Public Using Facebook Page, International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6, 1, (2021); Egerova D., Noskova M., Top management team composition and financial performance: Examining the role of gender diversity, Business Administration and Management, 22, 1, pp. 129-143, (2019); Freeman R.E., Dmytriyev S.D., Phillips R.A., Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm, Journal of Management, 47, 7, pp. 1757-1770, (2021); Giacomini D., Paredi D., Sancino A., Stakeholder interactions as sources for organisational learning: Insights from the water sector, Meditari Accountancy Research, 30, 7, pp. 1-25, (2022); Hall H., Relationship and role transformations in social media environments, The Electronic Library, 29, 4, pp. 421-428, (2011); Hamid S., Ijab M. T., Sulaiman H., Anwar R., Norman A.A., Social media for environmental sustainability awareness in higher education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18, 4, pp. 474-491, (2017); Herli M., Tjahjadi B., Hafidhah H., Gender diversity on board of directors and intellectual capital disclosure in Indonesia, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8, 1, pp. 135-144, (2021); Khalique M., Bontis N., Shaari J.A.N.B., Yaacob M.R., Ngah R., Intellectual capital and organisational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, (2018); Khattak M.S., Shah S.Z.A., The role of intellectual and financial capital in competitiveness and performance: A study of emerging small and medium enterprises, Business Strategy and Development, 3, 4, pp. 422-434, (2020); Kuralova K., Margarisova K., Intellectual capital disclosure at Czech Public Universities in relation to the stakeholder information need, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64, 6, pp. 1989-1998, (2016); Lagrosen S.O., Grunden K., Social media marketing in the wellness industry, TQM Journal, 26, 3, pp. 253-260, (2014); Laplume A.O., Sonpar K., Litz R.A., Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us †, Journals.Sagepub.Com, 34, 6, pp. 1152-1189, (2008); Lardo A., Dumay J., Trequattrini R., Russo G., Social media networks as drivers for intellectual capital disclosure: Evidence from professional football clubs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 63-80, (2017); Liang B., Scammon D.L., E-word-of-mouth on health social networking sites: An opportunity for tailored health communication, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10, 6, pp. 322-331, (2011); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 814-835, (2018); Miller K., Moffett S., McAdam R., Brennan M., Intellectual capital: A valuable resource for university technology commercialisation?, Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 1, pp. 429-437, (2013); Mokhtar E.S., Internet financial reporting determinants: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 15, 1, pp. 116-154, (2017); Nguyen A.T.H., Nguyen P.V., Do H.T.S., The effects of entrepreneurial orientation, social media, managerial ties on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs, International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6, 1, pp. 243-252, (2022); Nielsen C., Farooq O., Intellectual capital disclosure and dividend policy: Evidence from the Danish biotechnology sector, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 12, 1, (2015); Parker L., University corporatisation: Driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Passaro R., Quinto I., Thomas A., The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 135-156, (2018); Pour A. M., Saeedi A., Nasab M.B., The study of relationship between intellectual capital components and effectiveness of in islamicazad university of ahvazeducational programs, IIOAB Journal, 7, pp. 433-442, (2016); Prieto M., del C.P., Holgado M.A.T., The influence of relational capital and networking on the internationalization of the university spin-off, Intangible Capital, 15, 1, pp. 22-37, (2019); Ramirez Y., Dieguez-Soto J., Manzaneque M., How does intellectual capital efficiency affect firm performance? The moderating role of family management, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70, 2, pp. 297-324, (2020); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 5, pp. 701-732, (2019); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Sanchez M.P., Determinants of online intellectual capital disclosure by Spanish local governments, Journal of Intellectual Capita l, (2020); Rashid S., Mustafa H., Corporate reputation antecedents and stakeholder loyalty in Malawi higher education institutions: Employees’ and students’ perspectives, Tertiary Education and Management, 28, 1, pp. 101-117, (2022); Rowe J., Student use of social media: When should the university intervene?, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36, 3, pp. 241-256, (2014); Rutter R., Roper S., Lettice F., Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance, Journal of Business Research, 69, 8, pp. 3096-3104, (2016); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: What has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Schoen H., Gayo-Avello D., Takis Metaxas P., Mustafaraj E., Strohmaier M., Gloor P., The power of prediction with social media, Internet Research, 23, 5, pp. 528-543, (2013); Scott N., Goode D., The use of social media (some) as a learning tool in healthcare education: An integrative review of the literature, Nurse Education Today, 87, (2020); Secundo G., De Beer C., Schutte C.S.L., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: The technology transfer offices’ role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, pp. 2-9, (2018); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: An intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Soewarno N., Tjahjadi B., Measures that matter: An empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 1085-1106, (2020); Spica I., Garleja R., Berzina B., Intellectual Capital as the Performance Indicator of the University Studies, Proceedings of The 9th European Conference on In℡Lectual Capital (ECIC 2017), pp. 312-320, (2017); Ulum I., Harviana R.R., Zubaidah S., Jati A.W., Intellectual capital disclosure and prospective student interest: An Indonesian perspectives, Cogent Business and Management, 6, 1, (2019); Ulum I., Septerina A.T., Prasetyo A., Mohamed N., Abdullah A., Does intellectual capital disclosure enhance organization governance? Evidence from Indonesian biggest organizations, Advanced Science Letters, 23, 8, pp. 7878-7881, (2017); Valerio G., Valenzuela R., Social capital development of college students through online social networks, Intangible Capital, 9, 4, pp. 971-990, (2013); Yang X., Ye H., Wang X., Social media use and work efficiency: Insights from the theory of communication visibility, Information & Management, 58, 4, (2021)","M. Herli; Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; email: mohammad.herli-2017@feb.unair.ac.id","","OmniaScience","","","","","","20143214","","","","English","Intang. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85135253375"
"Boj J.J.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez R.; Alfaro-Saiz J.-J.","Boj, Jorge Juan (36186628500); Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Raul (34067858400); Alfaro-Saiz, Juan-Jose (34067505900)","36186628500; 34067858400; 34067505900","An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to link intangible assets and organizational performance in a Balanced Scorecard context","2014","Decision Support Systems","68","","","98","110","12","50","10.1016/j.dss.2014.10.002","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84911882203&doi=10.1016%2fj.dss.2014.10.002&partnerID=40&md5=8024b93d8e4f7874ddf914f539dc70e8","Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, CIGIP, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain","Boj J.J., Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, CIGIP, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain; Rodriguez-Rodriguez R., Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, CIGIP, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain; Alfaro-Saiz J.-J., Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, CIGIP, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain","In the current knowledge society, both intangible assets (IAs) and intellectual capital (IC) are considered some of the key drivers of value creation and competitive advantage generation for organizations by both researchers and practitioners. A wide range of models and methods have been developed from the 90s, with different approaches and from diverse management perspectives, with the objective of measuring and managing these two concepts. However, only a few of them are integrated in a performance measurement system context and analyze the relationships among the intangible assets and the strategic objectives defined within this context. This paper aims to develop a methodology for identifying, measuring and managing the relevance of intangible assets in the achievement of an organization's strategic objectives as defined in the Balanced Scorecard context. Within the methodology, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) is applied as a useful tool for both the representation of the relationships between the intangible assets and the strategic objectives and the evaluation of the impact of the intangible assets on the attainment of the strategic objectives. The proposed methodology was applied in a university research center in order to confirm the benefits that it provides in the management of intangible assets. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","ANP; Decision-making; Intangible assets; Performance","Competition; Knowledge management; Analytic network process; ANP; Competitive advantage; Intangible assets; Intellectual capital; Organizational performance; Performance; Performance measurement system; Decision making","","","","","","","Martin-Oliver A., Salas-Fumas V., V, IT assets, organization capital and market power, Decision Support Systems, 52, 3, pp. 612-623, (2013); Andrews K.R., The Concept of Corporate Strategy, (1971); Marr B., Gray D., Neely A., The dynamics of value creation: Mapping your intellectual performance drivers, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 312-325, (2004); Itami H., Mobilizing Invisibles Assets, (1987); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Grant R.M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33, 3, pp. 14-35, (1991); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Teece D.J., Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions, (2000); Delios A., Beamish P.W., Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 50, pp. 1028-1038, (2001); McGaughey S.L., Strategic interventions in intellectual assets flows, Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, pp. 248-274, (2002); Chang S.C., Chen S.S., Lai J.H., The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 36, pp. 298-316, (2008); Jurczak J., Intellectual capital measurement methods, Institute of Organization and Management in Industry ""oRGMASZ"", 1, 1, pp. 37-45, (2008); Kaufmann L., Schneider Y., Intangibles: A synthesis of current research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 366-388, (2004); Belton V., Stewart T.J., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, (2002); Han D., Han I., Prioritization and selection of intellectual capital measurement indicators using analytic hierarchy process for the mobile telecommunications industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 26, pp. 519-527, (2004); Hatami-Marbini A., A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytic hierarchy process, Omega, 39, 5, pp. 558-573, (2011); Xu Y., Yeh C.H., An integrated approach to evaluation and planning of best practices, Omega, 40, pp. 65-78, (2012); Abeysekera I., Guthrie J., Human capital reporting in a developing nation, The British Accounting Review, 36, pp. 251-268, (2004); Asonitis S., Kostagiolas P.A., An analytic hierarchy approach for intellectual capital: Evidence for the Greek central public libraries, Library Management, 31, 3, pp. 145-161, (2010); Ayzit G., Emel E., Modelling Intellectual Capital Based Innovative Competitive Advantage. 35th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Istanbul, 2, pp. 9-18, (2005); Brugha C.M., Phased multicriteria preference finding, European Journal of Operational Research, 1589, 2, pp. 308-316, (2004); Carlucci D., Schiuma G., Knowledge assets value creation map. Assessing knowledge assets value drivers using AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, pp. 814-821, (2007); Carmignani G., Bertolini M., Braglia M., Application of the AHP methodology in marking a proposal for a public work contract, International Journal of Project Management, 24, 5, pp. 422-430, (2006); Costa R., Evangelista S., An AHP approach to assess brand intangible assets, Measuring Business Excellence, 12, 2, pp. 68-78, (2008); Bozbura F.T., Beskese A., Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, pp. 1100-1112, (2007); Moslehi A., Mohaghar A., Badie K., Lucas C., Introducing a toolbox for IC measurement in the Iran insurance industry, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 2, pp. 169-180, (2006); Parung J., Bititci U.S., A conceptual metric for managing collaborative networks, Journal of Modelling in Management, 1, 2, pp. 116-136, (2006); Saaty T.L., Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (1980); Saaty T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal if Services Sciences, 1, 1, pp. 83-98, (2008); Pike S., Fernstrom L., Roos G., Intellectual capital management approach in ICS Ltd., Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 4, pp. 489-509, (2005); Pike S., Roos G., Marr B., Strategic management of intangible assets and value drivers in R&D organizations, R&D Management, 35, 2, pp. 111-124, (2005); Reisinger H., Cravens K.S., Tell N., Prioritizing performance measures within the balanced scorecard framework, Management International Review, 43, pp. 429-437, (2003); Saaty T.L., The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, (1996); Saaty T.L., Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, (2005); Choong K.K., Intellectual capital: Definitions, categorization and reporting models, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 4, pp. 609-638, (2008); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Sveiby K.E., The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets, (1997); Roos G., Pike S., Fernstrom L., Managing Intellectual Capital in Practice, (2005); Huang C.C., Luther R., Tayler M., An evidence-based taxonomy of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 3, pp. 386-408, (2007); Edvinsson L., Developing intellectual capital at Skandia, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 366-373, (1997); Brooking A., Intellectual Capital: Core Assets for the Third Millennium Enterprise, (1996); Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C., Edvinsson L., Capital Intelectual: El Valor Intangible de la Empresa, (1997); Sveiby K.E., The intangible assets monitor, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 2, 1, pp. 73-97, (1997); Petrash G., Dow's journey to a knowledge value management culture, European Management Journal, 14, 4, pp. 365-373, (1996); Saint-Onge H., Tacit knowledge: The key to the strategic alignment of Intellectual capital, Strategy & Leadership, 24, 2, pp. 10-14, (1996); Project I., Intellectual Capital Statement for Europe, Know-how on Creating, Describing and Developing Value in Small and Medium Enterprises, (2008); Bontis N., There is a price on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically, Business Quarterly, 60, 4, pp. 41-47, (1996); Viedma J.M., ICMS intellectual capital benchmarking system, International Journal of Technology Management, 20, 58, pp. 799-818, (2000); Camison C., Palacios D., Devece C., Un Nuevo Modelo Para la Medición Del Capital Intelectual: El Modelo Nova, (2000); Meritum Project, Directrices Para la Gestión y Difusión de Información Sobre Intangibles (Informe de Capital Intelectual), (2002); Bueno E., Creación, medición y gestión de intangibles: propuesta de modelo conceptual, Formas y Reformas de la Nueva Economía, Revista Madrid, monografía1, pp. 43-48, (2009); Bontis N., Dragonetti N., Jacobsen K., Roos G., The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources, European Management Journal, 17, 4, pp. 391-402, (1999); Allee V., The art and practice of being a revolutionary, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 2, pp. 121-131, (1999); Bukh P., Johansen M., Mouritsen J., Multiple integrated performance management systems: Intellectual capital and balanced scorecard in a software company, Singapore Management Review, 24, 3, pp. 21-33, (2002); Butler A., Letza S.R., Neale B., Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy, Long Range Planning, 30, 2, pp. 242-253, (1997); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The Strategy Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, (2000); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Mouritsen J., Thorsgaard H., Bukh P.N., Dealing with the knowledge economy: Intellectual capital versus balanced scorecard, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 1, pp. 8-27, (2005); Walker G., Macdonald R., Designing and implementing an HR scorecard, Human Resource Management, 20, 4, pp. 365-377, (2001); Hagood W.O., Friedman L., Using the balanced scorecard to measure the performance of your HR information system, Public Personnel Management, 31, 4, pp. 543-557, (2002); Andriessen D., Intellectual capital valuation and measurement: Classifying the state-of-the-art, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 230-242, (2004); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets, Harvard Business Review, 82, 2, pp. 52-63, (2004); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, (2004); Grigoroudis E., Orfanoudaki E., Zopounidis C., Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard, Omega, 40, 1, pp. 104-119, (2012); Marr B., Adams C., The balanced scorecard and intangible assets: Similar ideas, unaligned concepts, Measuring Business Excellence, 8, 3, pp. 18-27, (2004); Wu A., The integration between balanced scorecard and intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 267-284, (2005); Ravi V., Shankar R., Tiwari M.K., Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48, 2, pp. 327-356, (2005); Yuksel I., Datdeviren M., Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for balanced scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2, pp. 1270-1278, (2010); Thakkar J., Deshmukh S.G., Gupta A.D., Development of a balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP), International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, 1, pp. 25-59, (2006); Tseng M.L., Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard, Computers & Education, 55, 1, pp. 188-201, (2010); Leung L.C., Lam K.C., Cao D., Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, pp. 682-691, (2006); Chen F.-H., Hsu T.-S., Tzeng G.-H., A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 4, pp. 908-932, (2011); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard - Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70, 1, pp. 71-79, (1992); Verdecho M.J., Alfaro-Saiz J.J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez R., Priorization and management of inter-enterprise collaborative performance, Decision Support Systems, 53, pp. 142-153, (2012)","","","Elsevier","","","","","","01679236","","DSSYD","","English","Decis Support Syst","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84911882203"
"Saul R.","Saul, Roger (57197503098)","57197503098","When critical stances become scripted: Impediments to resonant dialogue in the education classroom","2017","Power and Education","9","3","","202","209","7","2","10.1177/1757743817737793","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061664821&doi=10.1177%2f1757743817737793&partnerID=40&md5=9c803aef2556a0ce42edaed2c182e614","Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick, Canada","Saul R., Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick, Canada","This essay, a speculative work, suggests that educational encounters of critical theory and pedagogy are today too often hampered by an emerging form of schooled reproduction in which university learners perform critical stances in order to garner recognition rather than for reasons of intellectual or political commitment. It suggests that the performance of these stances contributes to discursive conformity and threatens the vitality of the critical university classroom. It then pursues a strand of argument that considers two emerging, interrelated paradoxes of critical classroom practice, each indicative of how scripted critical stances can function as impediments to resonant educational encounters. The first, referred to as the ‘cultural capital paradox’, suggests that where expressions of critical theory and pedagogy are prized, a danger lurks that students may perform criticality simply to garner approval. The second, referred to as the ‘linguistic formalism paradox’, takes up the politics of language usage and positions some of its current contestations as impediments to the sustenance and success of the critical dialogical sphere. © The Author(s) 2017.","Critical pedagogy; critical theory; cultural capital; education; linguistic formalism; social justice","","","","","","","","Foucault M., (1980); Zizek S., (2017)","R. Saul; Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick, Canada; email: roger.saul@unb.ca","","SAGE Publications Ltd","","","","","","17577438","","","","English","Power  Educ.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85061664821"
"Chatterji N.; Kiran R.","Chatterji, Niti (57194852542); Kiran, Ravi (22985431500)","57194852542; 22985431500","Intellectual capital and intellectual imperatives of higher education sector: An emerging economy perspective","2021","International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital","18","1","","45","68","23","3","10.1504/IJLIC.2021.113660","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102809254&doi=10.1504%2fIJLIC.2021.113660&partnerID=40&md5=6f58e9e6b5522efe8a5b3dac1331a7d6","Amity Business School, Amity University, Amity Education Valley, Gurugram, Manesar, Panchgaon Haryana, 122412, India; School of Humanities and Social Science, Thapar University, P.O. Box 32, Bhadson Road, Patiala Punjab, 147004, India","Chatterji N., Amity Business School, Amity University, Amity Education Valley, Gurugram, Manesar, Panchgaon Haryana, 122412, India; Kiran R., School of Humanities and Social Science, Thapar University, P.O. Box 32, Bhadson Road, Patiala Punjab, 147004, India","One in every four graduates of the world will be the product of Indian higher education system by the year 2030. Against the backdrop of the report issued by Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI), this study aims to explore the effect of university intellectual capital on ‘intellectual imperatives’ of the Indian higher education. Structural equation modelling was tested on 590 university faculty members to gauge the influence of university intellectual capital on the intellectual imperatives of the higher education sector identified in the report. Results revealed that intellectual capital strongly influences ‘intellectual imperatives’. Research conducive policies, employee-oriented practices, equal employment opportunities, stakeholder orientation and networking emerged as the earmarks of university intellectual capital. The study has international implications and provides policymakers and practitioners a feasible model to leverage university intellectual capital to create a situation conducive to enhance university performance. Copyright © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.","Human capital; Intellectual capital; Intellectual imperatives; Organisational capital; Relational capital","","","","","","","","Allameh S.M., Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 5, pp. 858-874, (2018); Bano S., Taylor J., Universities and the knowledge-based economy: perceptions from a developing country, Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 2, pp. 242-255, (2015); Bigliardi B., Dormio A.I., A balanced scorecard approach for R&D: evidence from a case study, Facilities, 28, 5, pp. 278-289, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops, measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Carrillo-Duran M.V., Garcia M.G., Exploring the need for stakeholders’ engagement through social networking sites to build the reputation of higher education organizations, Higher Education Quarterly, 75, 1, pp. 1-16, (2020); Casey R.J., Gentile P., Bigger S.W., Teaching appraisal in higher education: an Australian perspective, Higher Education, 34, 4, pp. 459-482, (1997); Chen M.H., Wang H.Y., Wang M.C., Knowledge sharing, social capital and financial performance: the perspectives of innovation strategy in technological clusters, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 16, 1, pp. 89-104, (2018); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Dobele A.R., Rundle-Thiele S., Kopanidis F., The cracked glass ceiling: equal work but unequal status, Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 3, pp. 456-468, (2014); Ferrer J.L., Morris L., Engaging elitism: the mediating effect of work engagement on affective commitment and quit intentions in two Australian university groups, Higher Education Quarterly, 67, 4, pp. 340-357, (2013); Higher Education in India: Vision 2030, (2013); Finney T.G., Finney R.Z., Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study, Education+Training, 52, 4, pp. 276-291, (2010); Fornell C., Larcker D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Marketing Res, 18, 1, pp. 39-50, (1981); Freitas I.M.B., Marques R.A., Silva E.M.D.P., University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in newly industrialized countries, Research Policy, 42, 2, pp. 443-453, (2013); Ganguly A., Talukdar A., Chatterjee D., Social capital, knowledge quality, knowledge sharing and innovation capability: an empirical study of the Indian pharmaceutical sector, Knowledge and Process Management, 26, 1, pp. 1-18, (2019); Gellatly I.R., Hunter K.H., Currie L.G., Irving P.G., HRM practices and organizational commitment profiles, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 4, pp. 869-884, (2009); Harman G., University-industry research partnerships in Australia: extent, benefits and risks, Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 3, pp. 245-264, (2001); Huang F., Building the world-class research universities: a case study of China, Higher Education, 70, 2, pp. 203-215, (2015); Isaac R.G., Herremans I.M., Kline T.J., Intellectual capital management enablers: a structural equation modeling analysis, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 3, pp. 373-391, (2010); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70, 1, pp. 71-90, (1992); Karathanos D., Karathanos P., Applying the balanced scorecard to education, Journal of Education for Business, 80, 4, pp. 222-230, (2005); Kenny J.D., Managing a modern university: is it time for a rethink?, Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 6, pp. 629-642, (2009); Khalique M., Bontis N., Shaari J.A.N., Yaacob M.R., Ngah R., Intellectual capital and organizational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 20-36, (2018); Koc N, Celik B., The impact of number of students per teacher on student achievement, Proceedings of the Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education, pp. 65-70, (2015); Kweh Q.L., Ting I.W.K., Hanh L.T.M., Zhang C., Intellectual capital, governmental presence, and firm performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 193-211, (2019); Lauring J., Selmer J., Social climate in diverse university departments: the role of internal knowledge sharing, Educational Research, 53, 3, pp. 347-362, (2011); Lee I.C., Lin C.Y.Y., Lin T.Y., The creation of national intellectual capital from the perspective of Hofstede’s national culture, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 4, pp. 807-831, (2017); Lee S.H., Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7, pp. 4941-4947, (2010); Minguillo D., Thelwall M., Which are the best innovation support infrastructures for universities? Evidence from R&D output and commercial activities, Scientometrics, 102, 1, pp. 1057-1081, (2015); Nguyen T.H., Building human resources management capacity for university research: the case at four leading Vietnamese universities, Higher Education, 71, 2, pp. 231-251, (2016); Noaman A.Y., Ragab A.H.M., Madbouly A.I., Khedra A.M., Fayoumi A.G., Higher education quality assessment model: towards achieving educational quality standard, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1, pp. 23-46, (2015); Ooi C.A., Hooy C.W., Som A.P.M., The influence of board diversity in human capital and social capital in crisis, Managerial Finance, 43, 6, pp. 700-719, (2017); Pedro E., Leitao J., Portugal C., Spain S., Alves H., Back to the future of intellectual capital research: a systematic literature review, Management Decision, 56, 11, pp. 2502-2583, (2018); Pick D., Teo S., Yeung M., Friend of foe? New managerialism and technical, administrative and clerical support staff in Australian universities, Higher Education Quarterly, 66, 1, pp. 3-23, (2012); Plewa C., Galan-Muros V., Davey T., Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective, Higher Education, 70, 1, pp. 35-53, (2015); Postiglione G.A., Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong’s research universities: network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 3, pp. 345-366, (2013); Postiglione G.A., Arimoto A., Building research universities in East Asia, Higher Education, 70, 2, pp. 151-153, (2015); Saddozai S.H., Peng H., Akram U., Khan M.S., Memon S., Investigation of talent, talent management, its policies and its impact on working environment, Chinese Management Studies, 11, 3, pp. 538-554, (2017); Salaran M., Research productivity and social capital in Australian higher education, Higher Education Quarterly, 64, 2, pp. 133-148, (2010); Sanchez-Barrioluengo M., Uyarra E., Kitagawa F., Understanding the evolution of the entrepreneurial university. The case of English higher education institutions, Higher Education Quarterly, 73, 4, pp. 469-495, (2019); Sayed N., Ratify, reject or revise: balanced scorecard and universities, International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 3, pp. 203-220, (2013); Severiens S., Meeuwisse M., Born M., Student experience and academic success: comparing a student-centred and a lecture-based course programme, Higher Education, 70, 1, pp. 1-17, (2015); Shah M., Nair S., The influence of strategy and external quality audit on university performance: an Australian perspective, Tertiary Education and Management, 17, 2, pp. 139-150, (2011); Shen J., Chanda A., D'Netto B., Monga M., Managing diversity through human resource management: an international perspective and conceptual framework, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2, pp. 235-251, (2009); Shin J.C., Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S, Higher Education, 60, 1, pp. 47-68, (2010); Sullivan P.H., Sullivan P.H., Valuing intangible companies – an intellectual capital approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 4, pp. 328-340, (2000); Syh-Jong J., A study of students’ construction of science knowledge: talk and writing in a collaborative group, Educational Research, 49, 1, pp. 65-81, (2007); Teodorescu D., Institutional researchers as knowledge managers in universities: envisioning new roles for the IR profession, Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 1, pp. 75-88, (2006); Times Higher Education World University Rankings, (2016); Tirronen J., Nokkala T., Structural development of Finnish universities: achieving competitiveness and academic excellence, Higher Education Quarterly, 63, 3, pp. 219-236, (2009); Umashankar V., Dutta K., Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: an Indian perspective, International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 1, pp. 54-67, (2007); Utulu S.C., Okoye M.A., Application of social capital theory to Nigerian university web sites, The Electronic Library, 28, 1, pp. 171-183, (2010); Valenti A., Horner S.V., Leveraging board talent for innovation strategy, Journal of Business Strategy, 41, 1, pp. 11-18, (2019); Vishnu S., Gupta V.K., Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 83-99, (2014); Webber M., Lynch S., Oluku J., Enhancing student engagement in student experience surveys: a mixed methods study, Educational Research, 55, 1, pp. 71-86, (2013); Willie P.A., Connor D., Sole J., Forgacs G., Grieve R., Mueller J., Human capital challenges in the hotel industry of Canada: finding innovative solutions, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 9, 4, pp. 402-410, (2017); Yeravdekar V.R., Tiwari G., Global rankings of higher education institutions and India’s effective non-presence: why have world class universities eluded the Indian higher education system? And, how worthwhile is the Indian government’s captivation to launch world class universities?, Proceedings of the International Relations Conference on India and Development Partnerships in Asia and Africa, pp. 63-83, (2014); Zhang L., Bao W., Sun L., Resources and research production in higher education: a longitudinal analysis of Chinese universities, 2000–2010, Research in Higher Education, 57, 7, pp. 869-891, (2016); Zhang Y., O'Halloran K.L., Toward a global knowledge enterprise’: university websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education, Critical Discourse Studies, 10, 4, pp. 468-485, (2013)","N. Chatterji; Amity Business School, Amity University, Amity Education Valley, Manesar, Panchgaon Haryana, Gurugram, 122412, India; email: nitisings13@gmail.com","","Inderscience Publishers","","","","","","14794853","","","","English","Int. J. Learn. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85102809254"
"de Frutos-Belizón J.; Martín-Alcázar F.; Sánchez-Gardey G.","de Frutos-Belizón, Jesús (57208145688); Martín-Alcázar, Fernando (8691688600); Sánchez-Gardey, Gonzalo (8691688500)","57208145688; 8691688600; 8691688500","Conceptualizing academic intellectual capital: definition and proposal of a measurement scale","2019","Journal of Intellectual Capital","20","3","","306","334","28","34","10.1108/JIC-09-2018-0152","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063934499&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-09-2018-0152&partnerID=40&md5=790cb33bf170ca4b4e3d3a2b6ff40fe2","Department of Business Management, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain","de Frutos-Belizón J., Department of Business Management, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain; Martín-Alcázar F., Department of Business Management, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain; Sánchez-Gardey G., Department of Business Management, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and validation of an instrument for measuring intellectual capital in the academic research context. The current research context describes a new paradigm of scientific production characterized by interdisciplinarity, heterogeneity and the intensification of the relations between the generators of knowledge. In this scenario, traditional measures of intellectual capital do not capture all the variables that make up the environment in which the research activities are carried out. This transformation of research processes suggests the need to bring theories of organizational behavior, more appropriate to an organizational context, to the study of scientific context. Thus, the paper contextualizes the intellectual capital approach, thereby explaining how the different attributes that build it influence scientific productivity and providing a measurement instrument to evaluate relative levels of intellectual capital in an academic research context. Design/methodology/approach: The scale was designed through a double qualitative–quantitative scale development process. The literature on intellectual capital does not provide strong theoretical support for the definition of a specific set of items to be applied in the specific academic research context. Consequently, the scale constructs and observable variables were initially conceptualized through a Delphi panel. This initial set of indicators was empirically validated through a second quantitative stage to a sample of 1,798 Spanish academics. Given that no prior published studies have examined the construct validity of the proposed scale, and the proposed scale is not based on other previously validated scales, the authors used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to assess the internal consistency, using Cronbach’s α to determine reliability. Findings: Drawing on the evidence obtained from a double qualitative–quantitative process, a scale consisting of 47 items was proposed to measure the three dimensions of intellectual capital, namely, the researcher’s human capital, as well as the nature of the social capital and organizational capital of the team in which the scholar is integrated. The process of identifying and validating indicators of intellectual capital allowed the authors to identify certain intangible elements that are key in the research process and that, therefore, determine scientific productivity. Thus, the proposed scale contributes by conceptualizing new variables that could be used to deepen and broaden the study of the determinants of research performance. The contextualization of intellectual capital approach can also help to assess the value of intangibles, offering an external reporting tool and making universities’ social contributions more visible to public and private stakeholders, justifying the efforts made by societies in the generation of academic knowledge. Research limitations/implications: The empirical analysis was carried out with an initial sample of 1,798 Spanish scholars. The validation of the scale should therefore be confirmed in different national contexts, with larger data sets. Likewise, the use of longitudinal data sets could help to study the effects of intellectual capital in academic research, thereby contributing to the ongoing debate on the determinants of research performance. Originality/value: From a practical perspective, the instrument could be considered both as a management and an external reporting tool, providing a self-assessment instrument of the levels of intellectual capital. As a management tool, a specific measure of intellectual capital in an academic context could help to identify training needs, the implementation of practices that encourage the capability for building research networks and the development of reports with intellectual capital-related inputs for the justification of the resources received. At an institutional level, the proposed set of indicators also identifies the attributes of scholars linked to higher scientific performance, and the scale could be used as an instrument for selection processes in academic institutions, to develop practices related to the distribution of workload or the publication of intellectual capital indicators of its researchers in a healthy exercise of transparency. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Academic research; Delphi panel; Intellectual capital; Measurement scale; Scientific team; University","","","","","","Andalusia Government, (PR2016-018); Research Projects University of Cadiz; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitively, (P12-SEJ-1618, P12-SEJ-1810)","The authors appear in alphabetical order and have contributed equitably to this work. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. This study has benefited from financing from the Research Project ECO2014-56580-R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitively, and the Research Projects P12-SEJ-1810 and P12-SEJ-1618 from the Andalusia Government (Spain) and PR2016-018 (Research Projects University of Cadiz).","Abbasi A., Altmann J., Hossain L., Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: a correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 4, pp. 594-607, (2011); Agarwal R., Ohyama A., Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists, Management Science, 59, 4, pp. 950-970, (2013); Akerlind G.S., An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature, Studies in Higher Education, 33, 1, pp. 17-31, (2008); Andrews R., Organizational social capital, structure and performance, Human Relations, 63, 5, pp. 583-608, (2010); Aramburu N., Saenz J., Structural capital, innovation capability, and size effect: an empirical study, Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 3, pp. 307-325, (2011); Azoulay P., Ganguli I., Graff Zivin J., The mobility of elite life scientists: professional and personal determinants, Research Policy, 46, 3, pp. 573-590, (2017); Barjak F., Research productivity in the internet era, Scientometrics, 68, 3, pp. 343-360, (2006); Barnacle R., Dall'Alba G., Research degrees as professional education?, Studies in Higher Education, 36, 4, pp. 459-470, (2011); Bazeley P., Conceptualising research performance, Studies in Higher Education, 35, 8, pp. 889-903, (2010); Becker G.S., Human Capital, (1975); Bercovitz J., Feldman M., The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: composition, social networks, and geography, Research Policy, 40, 1, pp. 81-93, (2011); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bontis N., Ciambotti M., Palazzi F., Sgro F., Intellectual capital and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 712-731, (2018); Bozeman B., Dietz J., Gaughan M., Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation, International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 8, pp. 716-740, (2001); Bozeman B., Fay D., Slade C.P., Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art, Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1, pp. 1-67, (2013); Brown T.A., Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, (2014); Cabello-Medina C., Lopez-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrera R., Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 4, pp. 807-828, (2011); Cabrera-Nguyen P., Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the journal of the society for social work and research, Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 2, pp. 99-103, (2010); Carmona-Lavado A., Cuevas-Rodriguez G., Cabello-Medina C., Social and organizational capital: building the context for innovation, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 4, pp. 681-690, (2010); Casanueva C., Gallego A., Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks, Innovation, 12, 1, pp. 105-117, (2010); Chang Y.C., Yang P.Y., Chen M.-H., The determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective, Research Policy, 38, 6, pp. 936-946, (2009); Chen F., Curran P.J., Bollen K.A., Kirby J., Paxton P., An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models, Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 4, pp. 462-494, (2008); Chiucchi S.M., Intellectual capital accounting in action: enhancing learning through interventionist research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 48-68, (2013); Claes C., Van Hove G., van Loon J., Vandevelde S., Schalock R.L., Quality of life measurement in the field of intellectual disabilities: eight principles for assessing quality of life-related personal outcomes, Social Indicators Research, 98, 1, pp. 61-72, (2010); Cummings J.N., Kiesler S., Bosageh Zadeh R., Balakrishnan A.D., Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups, Psychological Science, 24, 6, pp. 880-890, (2013); Deem R., Lucas L., Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities, Higher Education, 54, 1, pp. 115-133, (2007); DeVellis R.F., Scale Development: Theory and Applications, (2003); Drummond C., Fischhoff B., Development and validation of the scientific reasoning scale, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 1, pp. 26-38, (2017); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Durette B., Fournier M., Lafon M., The core competencies of PhDs, Studies in Higher Education, 41, 8, pp. 1355-1370, (2016); Edgar F., Geare A., Factors influencing university research performance, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 5, pp. 774-792, (2013); Edvinsson L., Malone M., Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, (2010); Farooq R., Role of structural equation modeling in scale development, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 13, 1, pp. 75-91, (2016); Fochler M., Felt U., Muller R., Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives, Minerva, 54, 2, pp. 175-200, (2016); Fullwood R., Rowley J., Delbridge R., Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 1, pp. 123-136, (2013); Gerbing D.W., Anderson J.C., An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 2, pp. 186-192, (1988); Giuliani M., Marasca S., Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: a case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 377-391, (2011); Gonzalez-Brambila C.N., Social capital in academia, Scientometrics, 101, 3, pp. 1609-1625, (2014); Gonzalez-Brambila C.N., Veloso F.M., Krackhardt D., The impact of network embeddedness on research output, Research Policy, 42, 9, pp. 1555-1567, (2013); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2006); Heijde C.M., Van Der Heijden B.I., A competence-based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability, Human Resource Management, 45, 3, pp. 449-476, (2006); Hicks D., Performance-based university research funding systems, Research Policy, 41, 2, pp. 251-261, (2012); Hinkin T.R., A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires, Organizational Research Methods, 1, 1, pp. 104-121, (1998); Holste J.S., Fields D., Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use, Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 1, pp. 128-140, (2010); Jacob B.A., Lefgren L., The impact of NIH postdoctoral training grants on scientific productivity, Research Policy, 40, 6, pp. 864-874, (2011); Jick T.D., Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4, pp. 602-611, (1979); Kannan G., Aulbur W.G., Intellectual capital: measurement effectiveness, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 5, pp. 389-413, (2004); Kline R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (2015); Kong E., Thomson S.B., An intellectual capital perspective of human resource strategies and practices, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 4, pp. 356-364, (2009); Kwon S.W., Adler P.S., Social capital: maturation of a field of research, Academy of Management Review, 39, 4, pp. 412-422, (2014); Kyvik S., The academic research role: enhancing expectations and improved performance, Higher Education, 65, 4, pp. 525-538, (2013); Leana C.R., Pil F.K., Social capital and organizational performance: evidence from urban public schools, Organization Science, 17, 3, pp. 353-366, (2006); Lee H., Miozzo M., Laredo P., Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: the case of graduates from a UK research-based university, Research Policy, 39, 7, pp. 869-881, (2010); Lee Y.N., Walsh J.P., Wang J., Creativity in scientific teams: unpacking novelty and impact, Research Policy, 44, 3, pp. 684-697, (2015); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Li E.Y., Liao C.H., Yen H.R., Co-authorship networks and research impact: a social capital perspective, Research Policy, 42, 9, pp. 1515-1530, (2013); Liao C.H., How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks, Scientometrics, 86, 3, pp. 747-761, (2011); Lindberg O., Rantatalo O., Competence in professional practice: a practice theory analysis of police and doctors, Human Relations, 68, 4, pp. 561-582, (2015); Liu P., Xia H., Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field, Scientometrics, 103, 1, pp. 101-134, (2015); Lloret-Segura S., Ferreres-Traver A., Hernandez-Baeza A., Tomas-Marco I., El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada, Anales de Psicología, 30, 3, pp. 1151-1169, (2014); McNie E.C., Parris A., Sarewitz D., Improving the public value of science: a typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research, Research Policy, 45, 4, pp. 884-895, (2016); Marie J., Postgraduate science research skills: the role of creativity, tacit knowledge, thought styles and language, London Review of Education, 6, 2, pp. 149-158, (2008); Martin-de-Castro G., Delgado-Verde M., Lopez-Saez P., Navas-Lopez J.E., Towards ‘an intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: origins and nature, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 4, pp. 649-662, (2011); Mooken M., Sugden R., The capabilities of academics and academic poverty, Kyklos, 67, 4, pp. 588-614, (2014); Mouritsen J., Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 6, pp. 820-841, (2006); Murayama K., Nirei M., Shimizu H., Management of science, serendipity, and research performance: evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the US, Research Policy, 44, 4, pp. 862-873, (2015); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Neumann A., Professing passion: emotion in the scholarship of professors at research universities, American Educational Research Journal, 43, 3, pp. 381-424, (2006); Nyberg A.J., Wright P.M., 50 years of human capital research: assessing what we know, exploring where we go, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 3, pp. 287-295, (2015); Okoli C., Pawlowski S.D., The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, 42, 1, pp. 15-29, (2004); Ployhart R.E., Moliterno T.P., Emergence of the human capital resource: a multilevel model, Academy of Management Review, 36, 1, pp. 127-150, (2011); Prufer J., Walz U., Academic faculty governance and recruitment decisions, Public Choice, 155, 3-4, pp. 507-529, (2013); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Manzaneque M., Priego A.M., Formulating and elaborating a model for the measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish public universities, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83, 1, pp. 149-176, (2017); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Santos-Penalver J.F., Tejada Ponce A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Rodriguez J., Gonzalez-Brambila C.N., The effects of external collaboration on research output in engineering, Scientometrics, 109, 2, pp. 661-675, (2016); Rotolo D., Messeni Petruzzelli A., When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross-community ties, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 5, pp. 648-670, (2013); Salaran M., Research productivity and social capital in Australian higher education, Higher Education Quarterly, 64, 2, pp. 133-148, (2010); Schumacker R.E., Lomax R.G., A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling, (2004); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: a critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Seibert S.E., Kacmar K.M., Kraimer M.L., Downes P.E., Noble D., The role of research strategies and professional networks in management scholars’ productivity, Journal of Management, 43, 4, pp. 1103-1130, (2017); Sharabati A., Naji Jawad S., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan, Management Decision, 48, 1, pp. 105-131, (2010); Shibayama S., Baba Y., Walsh J.P., Organizational design of university laboratories: task allocation and lab performance in Japanese bioscience laboratories, Research Policy, 44, 3, pp. 610-622, (2015); Shrum W., Genuth J., Chompalov I., Structures of Scientific Collaboration, (2007); Siadat S.A., Hoveida R., Abbaszadeh M., Moghtadaie L., Knowledge creation in universities and some related factors, Journal of Management Development, 31, 8, pp. 845-872, (2012); Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A., The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 3, pp. 450-463, (2005); Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S., Using Multivariate Statistics, (2013); Thunnissen M., Van Arensbergen P., A multi-dimensional approach to talent, Personnel Review, 44, 2, pp. 182-199, (2015); Timmerman B.C., Feldon D., Maher M., Strickland D., Gilmore J., Performance-based assessment of graduate student research skills: timing, trajectory, and potential thresholds, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 5, pp. 1-18, (2011); Ulrich W., Dash D.P., Research skills for the future: summary and critique of a comparative study in eight countries, Journal of Research Practice, 9, 1, pp. 1-21, (2013); Van den Brink M., Fruytier B., Thunnissen M., Talent management in academia: performance systems and HRM policies, Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 2, pp. 180-195, (2013); Veltri S., Bronzetti G., A critical analysis of the intellectual capital measuring, managing, and reporting practices in the non-profit sector: lessons learnt from a case study, Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 2, pp. 305-318, (2015); Villanueva-Felez A., Molas-Gallart J., Escriba-Esteve A., Measuring personal networks and their relationship with scientific production, Minerva, 51, 4, pp. 465-483, (2013); Vinig T., Lips D., Measuring the performance of university technology transfer using metadata approach: the case of Dutch universities, Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 6, pp. 1034-1049, (2015); Walsh J.P., Lee Y.N., The bureaucratization of science, Research Policy, 44, 8, pp. 1584-1600, (2015); Wang J., Peters H.P., Guan J., Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: lessons for developing countries, Journal of Knowledge Management, 10, 4, pp. 113-126, (2006); Wang Z., Wang N., Liang H., Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 230-258, (2014); White C.S., James K., Burke L.A., Allen R.S., What makes a ‘research star’? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty, International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 61, 6, pp. 584-602, (2012); Whitelock D., Faulkner D., Miell D., Promoting creativity in PhD supervision: tensions and dilemmas, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 2, pp. 143-153, (2008); Worthington R.L., Whittaker T.A., Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices, The Counselling Psychologist, 34, 6, pp. 806-838, (2006); Wright P.M., Coff R., Moliterno T.P., Strategic human capital: crossing the great divide, Journal of Management, 40, 2, pp. 353-370, (2014); Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B., The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science, 316, 5827, pp. 1036-1039, (2007); Youndt M.A., Snell S.A., Human resource configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance, Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 3, pp. 337-360, (2004)","J. de Frutos-Belizón; Department of Business Management, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain; email: jesus.defrutos@uca.es","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85063934499"
"Huang C.-M.","Huang, Chun-Ming (58056151700)","58056151700","How Do Young People Use Music? Towards a Sociology of Mediation for Amateurs; [年輕人如何使用音樂？朝向愛好者的中介社會學]","2022","Mass Communication Research","2022","153","","93","139","46","0","10.30386/MCR.202210.0018","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145983847&doi=10.30386%2fMCR.202210.0018&partnerID=40&md5=cf172dd08e53ae9690d528c08d374a89","The Department of Radio and Television, National Chengchi University, Taiwan","Huang C.-M., The Department of Radio and Television, National Chengchi University, Taiwan","Reflecting on youth culture studies’ frequent focus on the spectacular rather than the mundane aspects of everyday life (Bennett, 2015), this study applies theoretical reconstruction and empirical research to sketch out some of the current profiles of young people in Taiwan. Traditionally, popular music research typically relies on cultural studies rather than sociological approaches (Bennett, 2008) and rarely involves discussions of music sociology in Taiwan particularly. On the other hand, with the impact of social change and media technology, the practice of cultural consumption and taste has moved far away from Bourdieu’s (1984) social hierarchy of ‘distinction’, bringing forth the phenomenon of cultural omnivorousness (Peterson & Kern, 1996; DiMaggio & Mukhtar, 2004). Youth culture is also not all about ‘resistance’ or reflection for the social class, but more about the complex interplay between self-identity, consumer sovereignty, and commerce. The ‘omnivore’ is a characteristic of today’s consumer society, with many young people switching frequently between mandopop, western rock, new folk, indie bands, and hip-hop, presenting a diverse and overlapping musical identity. Equally, they are not all obsessed fans nor are they experts or ‘devoted’ music lovers, yet few studies have delved into these ordinary experiences within the context of everyday life. This article begins with a critical review of youth culture studies and points to recent scholarly reflections on subcultures, particularly the tradition represented by Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS). DeNora, Hennion, Born and others are seen as a recent aesthetic turn in music sociology (Hanquinet & Savage, 2015) and new directions (Shepherd and Devine, 2015), critiquing the reflexive engagement of listeners with music, which has not yet received much attention from academics. Prior (2013, p. 189) describes it as a shift from a general sociology of how people are constrained by social structures to a sociology concerned with ‘how people do things with music’, highlighting the importance of the ‘mediation’ and ‘amateuring’ orientation. Finally, the musical experiences of young people at the University of C are used as an example to discuss the characteristics of these transformations. It is proposed that a sociology of mediation towards amateurs could expand the scope of audience research. The empirical study is based on questionnaires from 104 participants and analyzed in conjunction with in-depth interview data from 18 participants in the field. The sample has its limitations, characterized by more or less middle-class, relatively advantaged, and intellectual conditions. This empirical study focuses on two main directions: (1) the relationship between music experience and its personal biography, especially from childhood to the present day, so as to review their musical experiences around family, school, and social worlds. (2) The use and the positioning of music in everyday life. There are six aspects of analysis (1) Discussion of how respondents encounter music, especially as a family activity, as opposed to appreciative listening. (2) Exploration of how peers and friends use music for social and identity reasons as they grow up. (3) To reflect on the ambivalence of school music for young people and to outline the displacement of tastes. (4) To further address how young people express and perform their emotions through music. (5) To explore how they have rapidly expanded their musical preferences in the Internet age through multiple approaches, reflecting and symbioticizing through digitalized identity. (6) Discussion of how they play music through school societies’ participations. We shall reflect on the relationships between music, amateurship, and cultural capital. The study finds that respondents’ experiences of music are inextricably linked to family, school networks, and technological changes, with family activities being the beginning of their exposure to music, but the influence of peers and media may be even more crucial. Music is both a mediating agent of communication and the repertoire of it (Hennion, 2003) to support family activities, socialization, friendship, and identity (DeNora, 2000). Music is a means in the development of their self-identity, and the renewal and dramatic changes in media technology are taking place at a time when the Internet Generation (iGen) is growing up. This suggests that members of iGen are likely to be more capable and active in experiencing different genres of music, in contrast to their experience of western art music in schools, with its focus on music history and theory. Listening to music is thus not an isolated form of contemplation or appreciation, but rather a ‘technology of the self’ (DeNora, 2000): a means of expressing their ineffable emotions as well as strengthening and isolating them. In addition, young people develop their talents through music and raise a growing awareness that music is not only a ‘form of entertainment’, but also intellectual capital leading the ‘great minority’ among them (Riseman, 1960) to continue to enjoy it and to invest more enthusiasm in it, especially among the elite university students in this case. Some of them may have ‘progressed’ from ‘entertainment listener’ to ‘expert’ or ‘good listener’, presenting a hierarchy of ‘intellectual orientation’ or seeing it as ‘self-performance’, while others continue to see music as ‘entertainment’, ‘emotional listening’, or ‘cultural consumer’ (Adorno, 1976), presenting a complex overlap with differences in knowledge, performativity, and cultural capital. As an exploratory study, this paper identifies youth’s musical experiences via DeNora’s sociological interactionism, meaning that the significance of music is determined within the act, rather than according to its social origin (e.g., Bourdieu) or the correspondence of musical texts, which is usually the orientation of musicologists. This study takes a different approach by connecting the vein of youth studies, subcultural sociology, and the unexplored. Through the Adorno typology of audience, the sociology of music has recently been regarded as an ‘aesthetic turn’ and related to ‘knowledge’, ‘experience and feeling’, and ‘consumption and self-performance’, in order to avoid generalization, which may be a new direction in the local context. The University of C’s experience in action has helped to initiate a dialogue between theory and local practice, and in particular to reflect on how the agendas of communication and sociology can intervene in musical matters. This paper concludes that we can see music as an activity rather than a work and, as Hennion (2010) suggests, move towards a more pragmatist understanding by which to develop a mediated music sociology for the amateur, by delving into how listeners reflexively construct subjectivity and the musical experience and building an area of mediation research that can inform an audience paradigm in communication research. For sociologists, music sociology can be considered in the light of the changing times, and our research of music can shift from ‘sociology of music’ to ‘sociology with music’ (Prior, 2015, p. 354), in order to give the music a more subjective dimension and to explore more aspects of the music for lovers, social use, and interaction. © 2022 National Chengchi University. All rights reserved.","Adorno; amateurs; music and everyday life; sociology of music; youth culture","","","","","","","","(2013); 36, pp. 1-46; 43, pp. 93-158; 22, 2, pp. 95-122; 126, pp. 47-92; 13, pp. 27-50; 21, 2, pp. 61-103; 42, pp. 1-59; 36, pp. 275-288; 110, pp. 25-42; 85, pp. 84-87; 119, pp. 121-159; 5, 1, pp. 1-31; 24, pp. 101-121; Abercrombie N., Longhurst B. J., Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination, (1998); Adorno T., On the fetish character in music and the regression of listening, The culture industry, pp. 26-52, (1938); Adorno T., On popular music, Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader, pp. 73-84, (1941); Adorno T. W., Introduction to the sociology of music, (1976); Alexander J. C., The meanings of social life: A cultural sociology, (2003); Barker C., Jane E. A., Cultural studies: Theory and practice, (2016); Becker H. S., Outsiders, (1963); Becker H. S., Art worlds: Updated and expanded, (1984); Bennett A., Towards a cultural sociology of popular music, Journal of Sociology, 44, 4, pp. 419-432, (2008); Bennett A., Speaking of youth culture: A critical analysis of contemporary youth cultural practice, Youth cultures, transitions, and generations, pp. 42-55, (2015); Bennett A., Kahn-Harris K., After subculture: Critical studies in contemporary youth culture, (2004); Bennett T., Savage M., Silva E. B., Warde A., Gayo-Cal M., Wright D., Culture, class, distinction, (2009); Blumer H., Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, (1969); Booth W. C., For the love of it: Amateuring and its rivals, (1999); Born G., Listening, mediation, event: Anthropological and sociological perspectives, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135, pp. 79-89, (2010); Bourdieu P., Outline of a theory of practice, (1977); Bourdieu P., Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, (1984); Bull M., No dead air! The iPod and the culture of mobile listening, Leisure studies, 24, 4, pp. 343-355, (2005); Cohen A. K., Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang, (1955); Cote J., Arrested adulthood: The changing nature of maturity and identity, (2000); Crossley N., Bottero W., Music worlds and internal goods: The role of convention, Cultural Sociology, 9, 1, pp. 38-55, (2015); Cuervo H., Wyn J., Rethinking youth transitions in Australia: A historical and multidimensional approach (research report 33), (2011); DeNora T., Music in everyday life, (2000); DeNora T., After Adorno: Rethinking music sociology, (2003); DiMaggio P., Classification in art, American Sociological review, 52, pp. 440-445, (1987); DiMaggio P., Mukhtar T., Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of decline?, Poetics, 32, 2, pp. 169-194, (2004); Frith S., Sound effects: Youth, leisure, and the politics of rock ‘n’ roll, (1983); Frith S., The popular music industry, The Cambridge companion to pop and rock, pp. 26-52, (2001); Frith S., Music and everyday life, The cultural study of music: A critical introduction, pp. 92-101, (2003); Gans H. J., Working in six research areas: A multi-field sociological career, Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 1, pp. 1-19, (2009); Gitlin T., Media sociology: The dominant paradigm, Theory and Society, 6, 2, pp. 205-253, (1978); Hall S., Jefferson T., Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain, (2006); Hanquinet L., Savage M., Routledge international handbook of the sociology of art and culture, (2015); Hennion A., Music industry and music lovers, beyond Benjamin, Soundscapes, 2, (1999); Hennion A., Music and mediation: Towards a new sociology of music, The cultural study of music: A critical introduction, pp. 80-91, (2003); Hennion A., Loving music: From a sociology of mediation to a pragmatics of taste, Revista Comunicar, 17, 34, pp. 25-33, (2010); Hennion A., Taste as performance, The routledge reader on the sociology of music, pp. 161-167, (2015); Hesmondhalgh D., Why music matters, (2013); Ho T.-H., The social formation of the mandarin popular music industry in Taiwan, (2003); Jenkins H., Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture, (2008); Johansson S., Werner A., Aker P., Goldenzwaig G., Streaming music: Practices, media, cultures, (2018); Lewis G. H., Who do you love? The dimensions of musical taste, Popular music and communication, pp. 134-151, (1992); Lipstiz G., Foreword, My music: Explorations of music in daily life, pp. ix-xix, (1993); Livingstone S., Young people and the media, (2002); MacIntyre A.C., After virtue: A study in moral theory, (1985); Martin P., Culture, subculture and social organization, After subculture: Critical studies in contemporary youth culture, pp. 21-35, (2004); Martin P., Music and the sociological gaze, (2006); McQuail D., Audience analysis, (1997); Negus K., Audiences, Popular music in theory: An introduction, pp. 7-35, (1996); Parsons T., Age and sex in the social structure of the United States, American Sociological Review, 7, 5, pp. 604-616, (1942); Peterson R. A., Anand N., The production of culture perspective, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, pp. 311-334, (2004); Peterson R. A., Kern R. M., Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore, American Sociological Review, 61, 5, pp. 900-907, (1996); Prey R., Musica analytica: The datafication of listening, Networked music cultures: Contemporary approaches, emerging issues, pp. 31-48, (2016); Prior N., Bourdieu and the sociology of music consumption: A critical assessment of recent developments, Sociology Compass, 7, 3, pp. 181-193, (2013); Prior N., Bourdieu and Beyond, The routledge reader on the sociology of music, pp. 349-357, (2015); Regelski T. A., Amateuring in music and its rivals, Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 6, 3, pp. 22-50, (2007); Robards B., Bennett A., My tribe: Post subcultural manifestations of belonging on social network sites, Sociology, 45, 2, pp. 303-317, (2011); Scott J., Marshall G., A dictionary of sociology, (2014); Shepherd J., Devine K., The routledge reader in the sociology of music, (2015); Shippee M. R., The sound of starting where you are: Contemplative practice and music pedagogy, New Directions for Community Colleges, 151, pp. 77-89, (2010); Silverstone R., The sociology of mediation and communication, The sage handbook of sociology, pp. 188-207, (2005); Small C., Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening, (1998); Thornton S., Club cultures: Music, media, and subcultural capital, (1995); Tsai E., Ho T.-H., Jian M., Made in Taiwan: Studies in popular music, (2020); Twenge J. M., iGen, (2017); Whyte W. F., Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum, (1943); Williams R., Television: Technology and cultural form, (1974); Woodman D., Bennett A., Transitions, cultures, and the future of youth research, Youth cultures, transitions, and generations, pp. 186-191, (2015)","C.-M. Huang; The Department of Radio and Television, National Chengchi University, Taiwan; email: huangcm@nccu.edu.tw","","National Chengchi University","","","","","","10161007","","","","Chinese","Mass Commun. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85145983847"
"Yudianto I.; Mulyani S.; Fahmi M.; Winarningsih S.","Yudianto, Ivan (57221752883); Mulyani, Sri (57190950375); Fahmi, Mohamad (57199646804); Winarningsih, Srihadi (57208010191)","57221752883; 57190950375; 57199646804; 57208010191","The influence of good university governance and intellectual capital on university performance in Indonesia","2021","Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","10","1","","57","70","13","6","10.36941/ajis-2021-0006","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100015716&doi=10.36941%2fajis-2021-0006&partnerID=40&md5=cc0d649ff766e446426206096de67000","Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia; Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Jalan HS. Ronggowaluyo, Telukjambe Timur, Karawang District, West Java, 41361, Indonesia; Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia","Yudianto I., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia; Mulyani S., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Jalan HS. Ronggowaluyo, Telukjambe Timur, Karawang District, West Java, 41361, Indonesia; Fahmi M., Department of Economics and Development Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia; Winarningsih S., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor Sub-District, Sumedang District, West Java, 45363, Indonesia","University has the main task to develop science and technology to increase Indonesian competitiveness in the world. Researchers conduct the study based on the condition that the university governance and intellectual capital are not optimal to help achieve the expected performance at universities in Indonesia. The study aims to examine the influence of the Good University Governance and Intellectual Capital toward Performance in State-Owned Universities-Legal Entity (SU-LE) and State-Owned Universities-Public Service Agency (SU-PSA) in Indonesia. Researchers use quantitative methods and questionnaire instruments to collect data. The study concludes that good university governance and intellectual capital each positively and significantly influence SU-LE and SU-PSA performance in Indonesia. Moreover, good university governance has a positive and significant influence on the intellectual capital of SU-LE and SU-PSA in Indonesia. © 2021 Yudianto et.al.","Good university governance (GUG); Intellectual capital (IC); Universities performance (UP)","","","","","","","","Abbasi S. M., Hollman K. W., Turnover: The real bottom line, Public Personnel Management, 29, 3, pp. 333-342, (2000); Abidin Z. Z., Kamal N. M., Jusoff K., Board Structure and Corporate Performance in Malaysia, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1, 1, (2009); Aghion P., Dewatripont M., Hoxby C., Mas-Colell A., Sapir A., Higher Aspirations: An Agenda for Reforming European Universities, Bruegel Blueprint Series, 5, (2008); Aghion P., Dewatripont M., Hoxby C., Mas-Colell A., Sapir A., The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the US, Economic Policy, 25, 61, pp. 7-59, (2010); Al-Ali N., Comprehensive Intellectual Capital Management: Step by Step, (2003); Altbach P. G., Salmi J., The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities, (2011); Amiri A. N., Jandghi G., Alvani S. M., Hosnavi R., Ramezan M., Increasing the intellectual capital in the organization: Examining the role of organizational learning, European Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 1, pp. 98-108, (2010); An Y., Davey H., Eggleton I. R., The effects of the industry type, company size, and performance on Chinese companies' IC disclosure: A research note, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 5, 3, pp. 107-116, (2011); Attarit T., Analysis of mediating effect of intellectual capital efficiency linking board of directors' characteristics and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Thai listed companies, (2016); Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Birdi K., Allan C., Warr P., Correlates and perceived outcomes of 4 types of employee development activity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6, (1997); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, (1998); Bontis N., Keow W. C. C., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2000); Bontis N., Serenko A., The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities, Journal of knowledge management, (2007); Bradley K., Intellectual capital and the new wealth of nations, Business Strategy Review, 8, 1, pp. 53-62, (1997); Brown W. O., Faculty Participation in University Governance and the Effects on University Performance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44, 2, pp. 129-143, (2001); Cabrita M. d. R., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry, International Journal of Technology Management, 43, 1-3, pp. 212-237, (2008); Canibano L., Sanchez M. P., Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Carnegie G. D., Tuck J., Understanding the ABC of university governance, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 4, pp. 431-441, (2010); Carton R. B., Hofer C. W., Measuring organizational performance: Metrics for entrepreneurship and strategic management research, (2006); Chen M. C., Cheng S. J., Hwang Y., An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 2, pp. 159-176, (2005); Christensen T., Laegreid P., The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform, Public Administration Review, 67, 6, pp. 1059-1066, (2007); Managing The Intellectual Capital Within Today's Knowledge-Based Organizations, (2001); Clark M. H., Middleton S. C., Nguyen D., Zwick L. K., Mediating relationships between academic motivation, academic integration, and academic performance, Learning and Individual Differences, 33, pp. 30-38, (2014); Cooper D. R., Schindler P. S., Business research methods: McGraw-hill education, (2014); Corcoles Y. R., Importance of intellectual capital disclosure in Spanish universities, Intangible Capital, 9, 3, pp. 931-944, (2013); Corcoles Y. R., Penalver J. F. S., Ponce A. T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2011); d'Egmont R., Quality Culture in European Universities: A bottom-up approach, (2006); Dzinkowski R., The value of intellectual capital, Journal of business strategy, 21, 4, pp. 3-3, (2000); Edvinsson L., Developing intellectual capital at Skandia, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 366-373, (1997); El-Hilali N., Al-Jaber S., Hussein L., Students' Satisfaction and Achievement and Absorption Capacity in Higher Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, pp. 420-427, (2015); Fielden J., Global trends in university governance, (2008); Firer S., Mitchell Williams S., Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 3, pp. 348-360, (2003); Gayle D. J., Tewarie B., White A. Q., Governance in the Twenty-First-Century University: Approaches to Effective Leadership and Strategic Management, ERIC Digest, (2003); Global Innovation Index 2019 Rankings, (2019); Goodall A. H., Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities, Research Policy, 38, 7, pp. 1079-1092, (2009); Gorgani T., Investigating the Multivariate Relation of the Intellectual Capital, Organizational Intellegence and Organizational Innovation at the Islamic Azad University. District of 3 in Province of Manzandaran, MAGNT Research Report, 2, 4, pp. 501-510, (2014); Gruian C. M., The Influence Of Intellectual Capital On Romanian Companies' financial Performance, Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Oeconomica, 13, 2, (2011); Gulbrandsen M., Smeby J.-C., Industry funding and university professors' research performance, Research Policy, 34, 6, pp. 932-950, (2005); Henard F., Mitterle A., Governance and quality guidelines in Higher Education. A review of governance arrangements and quality assurance, (2010); Higgins J. C., Performance measurement in universities, European Journal of Operational Research, 38, 3, pp. 358-368, (1989); Hosseinzadeh Gogajeh H., Vahidirad H., Taghizadegan G. R., Mazloum Bilandi M., Investigating the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and corporate performance in accepted firms of tehran exchange, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 4, 1, pp. 13-19, (2015); Huang C. C., Luther R., Tayles M., An evidence-based taxonomy of intellectual capital, Journal of IntellectualCapital, (2007); Jaramillo A., Universities through the looking glass: Benchmarking university governance to enable higher education modernization in MENA, (2012); Kassahun T., Rethinking Institutional Excellence in Ethiopia: Adapting and Adopting the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Model, JBAS, 2, 1, pp. 22-53, (2010); Keenan J., Aggestam M., Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: Some Conceptualisations, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9, 4, pp. 259-275, (2001); Komnenic B., Pokrajcic D., Intellectual capital and corporate performance of MNCs in Serbia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 1, pp. 106-119, (2012); Lanvin B., Monteiro F., Bratt M., Entrepreneurial Talent for Competitiveness, The Global Talent Competitiveness Index, pp. 3-37, (2019); Liu E. S. C., Ye C. J., Yeung D. Y., Effects of approach to learning and self-perceived overall competence on the academic performance of university students, Learning and Individual Differences, 39, pp. 199-204, (2015); Lundvall B.-A., The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, (2016); Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C., Theriou G., The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 1, pp. 132-151, (2011); Makki M. A. M., Lodhi S. A., Impact of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital Efficiency and Financial Performance, Pak J Commer Soc Sci Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8, 2, pp. 305-330, (2014); Mano B. T., Thoyib A., Maskie G., Effect of Transformational Leadership Style. Information Technology, Organization Culture and Leader Innovation on Leader Performance (Study in Jayapura City Government), International Journal of Business and Management Invention, pp. 2319-8028, (2014); Manzoni A., Sardar M. N. I., Performance Measurement in Corporate Governance DEA Modelling and Implications for Organisational Behaviour and Supply Chain Management, (2009); Marginson S., Considine M., The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia, (2000); Mehralian G., Rajabzadeh A., Reza Sadeh M., Reza Rasekh H., Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Iranian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 1, pp. 138-158, (2012); Michalisin M. D., Smith R. D., Kline D. M., In search of strategic assets, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5, 4, (1997); Mouritsen J., Driving growth: economic value added versus intellectual capital, Management Accounting Research, 9, 4, pp. 461-482, (1998); Muhi A. H., Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Good Governance di Perguruan Tinggi, (2010); Muktiyanto A., Good University Governance dan Kinerja Program Studi: Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Manajemen, Teknik Manajemen, dan Pilihan Prioritas Strategi Sebagai Model Mediasi Fit, (2016); Mulyani S., Arum E. D. P., The influence of manager competency and internal control effectiveness toward accounting information quality, International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14, 1, pp. 181-190, (2016); Mulyani S., Fettry S., The influence of Audit committee composition, authority, resource, and diligence toward financial reporting quality, International Business Management, 10, 9, pp. 1756-1767, (2016); Nelson R. R., National Innovation Systems A Comparative Analysis, (1993); Principles of Corporate Governance: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (2004); Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society, (2008); Peltoniemi M., Diversity Of The Intellectual Capital of Firms within an Industry, (2006); Performance Report of the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia Year, (2018); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual Capital Literature Review Measurement, Reporting and Management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Rastogi P. N., Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital – The New Virtuous Reality Of Competitiveness, Journal of Human Systems Management, 19, 1, pp. 39-48, (2000); Safieddine A., Jamali D., Noureddine S., Corporate governance and intellectual capital: evidence from an academic institution, Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9, 2, pp. 146-157, (2009); Sanchez M. P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2009); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2010); Shattock M., University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty, Higher Education Quarterly, 67, 3, pp. 217-233, (2013); Shields J., Brown M., Kaine S., North-Samardzic A., Managing employee performance & reward: Concepts, practices, strategies, (2015); Shih K. H., Chang C. J., Lin B., Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in the banking industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 1, pp. 74-89, (2010); Sullivan P. H., Value-driven intellectual capital: how to convert intangible corporate assets into market value, (2000); Swartz N. P., Firer S., Board structure and intellectual capital performance in South Africa, (2005); Verweire K., Van den Berghe L., Berghe L., Integrated performance management: a guide to strategy implementation, (2004); Wahab Rochmat, Good, Transparent, and Accountable Higher Education Governance, (2016); Wahid A. H. D. A., Abu N. A., Latif W. A., Smith M., Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: Evidence from Public and Private Universities, Higher Education Studies, 3, 1, (2013); Wang X., Performance Measurement in Universities: Managerial Perspective, (2010); Wijatno S., Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Secara Efisien, Efektif, dan Ekonomis, (2009); Wu X., Sivalogathasan V., Intellectual Capital for Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Model for Innovation, International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, pp. 139-144, (2013); Zerenler M., Hasiloglu S. B., Sezgin M., Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence in the Turkish Automotive Supplier, Journal od Technology Management Innovation, 3, 4, (2008)","","","Richtmann Publishing Ltd","","","","","","22813993","","","","English","Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85100015716"
"Xia W.; Li B.; Yin S.","Xia, Wenfei (57216463708); Li, Baizhou (55555610700); Yin, Shi (56202062100)","57216463708; 55555610700; 56202062100","Identification of influencing factors for sustainable development: Evaluation and management of regional innovation performance in heilongjiang, China","2020","Sustainability (Switzerland)","12","7","2739","","","","5","10.3390/su12072739","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083662962&doi=10.3390%2fsu12072739&partnerID=40&md5=ba244b4dc789345a2db9042f56d7602d","School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China; School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, 125105, China","Xia W., School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China; Li B., School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China; Yin S., School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China, School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, 125105, China","Although the innovation factor endowment of Heilongjiang province is relatively rich, many innovation resources cannot effectively promote the sustainable development of innovation-driven performance. The combined drift degree evaluation method and grey-DEMATEL model were used to study regional innovation performance in Heilongjiang province and the key factors influencing it. The results of this study show that the overall trend of regional innovation performance is slowly rising. Compared with other regions, the level of science and technology output is in the forefront, and the level of economic output and social effect is at the end. The innovation performance level of enterprises and research institutions is at the end position, showing a trend of slow rise and then slow decline. The innovation performance level of universities is in the middle position, showing a trend of rising first, then falling and then rising. The degree of marketization, the financial environment, the intellectual property system, the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and the level of human capital are the core factors that affect the regional innovation performance. The dominant position and leading role of regional enterprises and the cooperation between industry, university and research institutes should be strengthened through government policies. © 2020 by the authors.","Drift degree evaluation method; Grey-DEMATEL model; Regional innovation; Sustainable development","China; Heilongjiang; human capital; innovation; intellectual property rights; performance assessment; regional development; regional planning; science and technology; sustainable development","","","","","National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC, (71601087); Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, MOE, (15YJC630088); National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, NPOPSS, (19FGLA001)","Funding: This research was funded by Key Projects of The National Social Science Fund of China (19FGLA001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71601087) and the Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Projects of Ministry of Education (15YJC630088).","Yin S., Li B.Z., Academic research institutes-construction enterprises linkages for the development of urban green building: Selecting management of green building technologies innovation partner, Sustain. Cities Soc, 48, (2019); Matthies A.L., Stamm I., Hirvilammi T., Narhi K., Ecosocial innovations and their capacity to integrate ecological, economic and social sustainability transition, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Liu Q., Hu B., A Study on the Two-way Causal Relationship Between Industrial Structure Evolution and Economic Growth: Empirical Test Based on 40 Years of Reform and Opening-up in China, Glob. J. Emerg. Mark. Econ, 11, pp. 98-118, (2019); Woo W.T., China's soft budget constraint on the demand-side undermines its supply-side structural reforms, China Econ. Rev, 57, (2019); Yin S., Li B.Z., Xing Z.Y., The governance mechanism of the building material industry (BMI) in transformation to green BMI: The perspective of green building, Sci. Total Environ, 677, pp. 19-33, (2019); Huang J., Cai X., Huang S., Tian S., Lei H., Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: Evidence based on a panel threshold model, China Econ. Rev, 54, pp. 271-285, (2019); Capello R., Lenzi C., Regional innovation evolution and economic performance, Reg. Stud, 53, pp. 1240-1251, (2019); Zhang J., The Influence of Supply-Side Reform on the Economic Development of Heilongjiang Province-A Residual Auto-Regressive Model Based on Time Series Analysis, 2019 3rd International Conference on Education, Economics and Management Research (ICEEMR 2019), pp. 71-76, (2019); Evaluation Report on China's Regional Innovation Capability 2018, (2018); Zhang L., Li C., Phuong N.H., Economic Development of Biomass Energy Industry in Heilongjiang Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process, Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol, 18, pp. 1487-1493, (2019); Deng J., Zhang N., Ahmad F., Draz M.U., Local government competition, environmental regulation intensity and regional innovation performance: An empirical investigation of Chinese provinces, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, (2019); Riddle M., Schwer R.K., Regional innovative capacity with endogenous employment: Empirical evidence from the U. S, Rev. Reg. Stud, 33, pp. 73-84, (2003); Tura T., Harmaakorp V., Social capital in building regional innovative capabilities: A theoretical and conceptual assessment. ERSA conference papers, Eur. Reg. Sci. Assoc, 3, pp. 1111-1125, (2003); Li B.Z., Su Y., Evaluation of regional scientific and technological innovation capability based on improved mutation series, China Soft Sci, 6, pp. 90-101, (2012); Huang D.S., Yang C., Convergence analysis of regional innovation ability based on spatial effect, Soft Sci, 31, pp. 44-48, (2017); Jin Q.H., Yan T.H., OFDI affects the dynamic threshold effect of regional innovation capacity, Sci. Res. Manag, 40, pp. 57-66, (2019); Yang R.Y., Market competition, government behavior and regional innovation performance-an empirical study based on China's provincial panel data, Res. Manag, 37, pp. 73-81, (2016); Hu Y., Wang X., Analysis on the influence of industrial structure optimization of the Yangtze river economic belt on regional innovation performance, Sci. Technol. Manag. Res, 39, pp. 86-93, (2019); Soderlund B., Tingvall P.G., Capital freedom, financial development and provincial economic growth in china, World Econ, 40, pp. 764-787, (2017); Barra C., Zotti R., The contribution of university, private and public sector resources to Italian regional innovation system (in) efficiency, J. Technol. Transf, 43, pp. 1-26, (2018); Hauser C., Siller M., Schatzer T., Walde J., Tappeiner G., Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 1290, pp. 43-55, (2018); Li B.Z., Zhou S., Research on the relationship between innovation behavior and regional innovation performance in research institutes, Sci. Sci. Manag. S T, 36, pp. 75-87, (2015); Wang D., Zhao Z.H., Research on the effect of fintech development on regional innovation performance, Stud. Sci. Sci, 37, pp. 45-56, (2019); Xiao Z.H., Fan J.D., Research on the influence of human resources input in science and technology on regional innovation performance, Stud. Sci. Sci, 37, pp. 1944-1954, (2019); Tan J.T., Zhang P.Y., Li J., Pattern and development process of urban innovation capacity in Heilongjiang province from 2001 to 2010, Prog. Geogr, 33, pp. 508-516, (2014); Li N., Problems existing in technology innovation in Heilongjiang province and solutions, Sci. Technol. Innov. Her, 12, pp. 226-228, (2015); Han Z.L., Sun J.Z., Liu T.B., Peng F., Zhong J.Q., The spatial and temporal characteristics of innovative total factor productivity growth and its development trend forecast in the three provinces of northeast China, Sci. Geogr. Sin, 37, pp. 161-171, (2017); Li J., Chan H.L., The influence of R&D personnel flow on regional innovation performance from the perspective of spatial correlation, Chin. J. Manag, 15, pp. 399-409, (2018); Li X.T., Zhang X.Y., Research on the influence mechanism of regional innovation ecosystem on regional innovation performance, Forecasting, 37, pp. 22-28, (2018); Deng R.B., Research on the influence of market distortion of R&D factors on regional innovation performance, Mod. Econ. Res, 10, pp. 108-116, (2019); Liang Y., Research on Technology Innovation System of Heilongjiang Province, (2012); Wu X.H., Bian J.L., Comprehensive evaluation of independent innovation capability of large and medium-sized industrial enterprises in Heilongjiang province, Sci. Technol. Manag. Res, 34, pp. 58-61, (2014); Hong Y., Analysis of regional technology innovation efficiency in Heilongjiang province based on DEA method, North. Econ. Trade, 10, pp. 74-79, (2015); Christoph K., Market-based financing in the capital markets union: The European commission's proposals to foster financial innovation in the EU, Eur. Co. Financ. Law Rev, 14, pp. 336-364, (2017); Corrado C.A., Haskel J., Jona-Lasinio C., Lommi M., Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: Measurement methods and comparative results, Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ, 7, (2012); Vitola A., Senfelde M., Evaluation of institutions in innovation-driven economies, Econ. Sci. Rural Dev, 17, pp. 94-103, (2015); Wang Z.J., Mao L., Wang Q., Evaluation and comparative analysis of regional innovation ability in central China, Technol. Econ, 30, pp. 44-50, (2011); Xue X.D., Wang X.Y., Evaluation of agricultural competitiveness in henan province based on principal component analysis, J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.), 11, pp. 1163-1167, (2014); Shi J.W., Wang Y.Y., Isomorphism of industrial structure in western provinces of China and its determinants-analysis and empirical test based on SIP framework, China Ind. Econ, 3, pp. 33-45, (2013); Yang W.J., Environmental performance factors of Chinese provincial industries-Empirical analysis based on the inter-temporal DEA-Tobit model, J. Beijing Inst. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.), 17, pp. 40-48, (2015); Li L.S., Yang H.C., Liu J., An evaluation study on the comprehensive development capability of China's regional manufacturing industry-based on the empirical analysis of the manufacturing industry in the eastern, central and western regions, China Soft Sci, 2, pp. 121-129, (2014); Zhao L., Sun L.Y., Liu J., Construction and application of the evaluation system for the sustainable development ability of regional manufacturing industry, Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy, 26, pp. 51-54, (2009); Li L., Wang Z., Evaluation and dynamic comparison of green competitiveness of China's regional manufacturing industry, Inq. Econ. Issues, 1, pp. 64-71, (2017); Yu H.W., Hu D.Z., China regional manufacturing quality competitiveness evaluation and analysis of influencing factors, Chin. J. Manag, 12, pp. 1703-1709, (2015); Cao H., Shi B.F., Zhao K., Evaluation and demonstration of green innovation ability at provincial level in China, Chin. J. Manag, 13, pp. 1215-1222, (2016); Feng Z.J., A study on the efficiency of green innovation in Chinese industrial enterprises, Forum Sci. Technol. China, 1, pp. 82-88, (2013); Li L.S., Cheng Z.H., Liu J., Research on the new type of Chinese manufacturing industry and its evaluation, China Ind. Econ, 2, pp. 63-75, (2015); Rudskaya I.A., Dmitry R., Comprehensive evaluation of Russian regional innovation system performance using a two-stage econometric model, Rev. Espac, 39, (2018); Antonopoulos I.S., Zouboulis A., Samaras P., Karagiannidis A., Indicators and options towards sustainability in industrial zones, Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev, 7, pp. 215-232, (2013); Brzezinski D., Stefanowski J., Combining block-based and online methods in learning ensembles from concept drifting data streams, Inf. Sci, 265, pp. 50-67, (2014); Sahin U., Forecasting of Turkey's greenhouse gas emissions using linear and nonlinear rolling metabolic grey model based on optimization, J. Clean. Prod, 239, (2019); Jiao J., Wei M., Yuan Y., Zhao T., Risk quantification and analysis of coupled factors based on the DEMATEL model and a bayesian network, Appl. Sci, 10, (2020); Hansen M.T., Julian B., The innovation value chain, Harv. Bus. Rev, 85, (2017); Xing X., Wang J., Tou L., The relationship between green organization identity and corporate environmental performance: The mediating role of sustainability exploration and exploitation innovation, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, (2019); Ratti R., Bramanti A., Gordon R., The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The GREMI Approach, (2019); Yang J., Su J., Song L., Selection of manufacturing enterprise innovation design project based on consumer's green preferences, Sustainability, 11, (2019); Asheim B.T., Isaksen A., Trippl M., Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems, (2019); Lim S., Kim J., Technology Portfolio and Role of Public Research Institutions in Industry 4.0: A Case of South Korea, Appl. Sci, 9, (2019)","B. Li; School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China; email: libaizhou@126.com","","MDPI","","","","","","20711050","","","","English","Sustainability","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85083662962"
"Romanov E.V.","Romanov, E.V. (57201057692)","57201057692","The phenomenon of tacit knowledge loss in high school: Causes and consequences part II; [ФЕНОМЕН УТРАТЫ НЕЯВНОГО ЗНАНИЯ ВЫСШЕЙ ШКОЛОЙ: ПРИЧИНЫ И ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ Часть II1]","2019","Obrazovanie i Nauka","21","5","","61","85","24","4","10.17853/1994-5639-2019-5-62-86","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066817006&doi=10.17853%2f1994-5639-2019-5-62-86&partnerID=40&md5=f4a0c63858687ba1d032c7d1066353fd","Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation","Romanov E.V., Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation","Introduction. The implementation of the strategic goal of Russia's entry into one of the five largest economies in the world actualises the research aimed at identifying conditions for improving the quality of human capital, one of which is the creation of an integrated system of training and professional growth of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel. The aim of the present research was to substantiate the statement that the strategy of reforming higher education in Russia leads to the loss of tacit knowledge in higher education as a basis for determining the quality of educational and scientific activities. This process has a negative impact on the formation of the system of training and professional growth of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel (both in content and procedural aspects). Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the research was based on a systematic approach and an inductive method. The following general scientific methods were employed: analytical review of statistical sources and literature on the discussed issues, generalisation and comparison. The method of comparative analysis was used to assess the dynamics of changes in funding standards of universities in Sverdlovsk region, Chelyabinsk region and the Republic of Dagestan. Results and scientific novelty. The author substantiates the validity of the thesis on the loss of tacit knowledge in higher education, indirect confirmation of which is a significant reduction in the protection of PhD and doctoral theses with a significant decrease in patent activity in universities and activity to generate income from the results of intellectual activity. It is proved that the existing system of normative-per capita financing is the main “tool”, providing the loss of tacit knowledge: the level of a teacher's workload is increased that it is impossible to carry out research related to the courses, which leads to a decrease in the quality of education. A formula for calculating the number of students, which ensures the performance of the average salary of the teaching staff at a certain number of disciplines per teacher, is proposed. On the example of the direction “Management”, it is shown that even through annual allocation of 25 budgetary places the teacher of profile disciplines will teach not less than 5 academic disciplines. In the absence of commercial recruitment comparable to the budget and additional sources of funding, the number of teaching staff will be reduced and the number of courses per teacher will increase. The proposals for preservation and reproduction of the personnel potential of state universities, involving the changes in the performance indicators of universities and the development of financial instruments that stimulate their achievement, are formulated. Practical significance. The materials and results of the research paper can be used by education authorities to develop the university strategy in terms of forecasting the volume of reductions in the number of teaching staff and the income that the university should receive to preserve its human resources. © 2019 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University. All rights reserved.","Higher education; Normative per capita financing; Number of disciplines per teacher; Tacit knowledge","","","","","","","","Balatskiy E.V., Syndrome of reforms' arrhythmia in the higher education, Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 4, 24, pp. 111-140, (2014); Kuzminov Ya.I., Challenges and prospects of development of universities in Russia. Interview of the editor-in-chief A. K. Klyuev with the Rector of the National research university “Higher School of Economics, Universitetskoe Upravle-Nie: Praktika I Analiz = the Journal University Management: Practice and Analysis, 22, 4, pp. 5-8, (2018); Kuzminov Ja.I., Peskov D.N., Discussion “what tomorrow holds for universities, Voprosy Obrazovanija =Educational Studies Moscow, 3, pp. 202-233, (2017); Zaborova E.N., Glazkova I.G., Markova T.L., Distance learning: Students' perspective, Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2, pp. 131-139, (2017); Edwards M.R., Clinton M.E., A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment, Higher Education, (2018); Johnston A.N.B., Massa H., Burne T.H.J., Digital lecture recording: A cautionary tale, Nurse Education in Practice, 13, pp. 40-47, (2013); Traphagan T., Kucsera J.V., Kishi K., Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 1, pp. 19-37, (2010); Turygin O.M., Internal sources to increase financing for fixed investments in a company, Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of Region, 14, 4, pp. 1498-1511, (2018); Romanov E.V., Higher education: Current state and development prospects, Ekonomicheskaja Politika = Economy Policy, 13, 3, pp. 182-205, (2018)","Е.V. Romanov; Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation; email: evgenij.romanov.1966@mail.ru","","Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University","","","","","","19945639","","","","Russian","Obraz. Nauka","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85066817006"
"Baker H.K.; Kumar S.; Goyal K.; Gupta P.","Baker, H. Kent (58880193800); Kumar, Satish (57992552600); Goyal, Kirti (57225392223); Gupta, Prashant (57208003837)","58880193800; 57992552600; 57225392223; 57208003837","International journal of finance and economics: A bibliometric overview","2023","International Journal of Finance and Economics","28","1","","9","46","37","7","10.1002/ijfe.2725","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141645581&doi=10.1002%2fijfe.2725&partnerID=40&md5=400e95fcd39a546e713d29fbacc3631c","Department of Finance and Real Estate, Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Management Studies, Malaviya National Instiute of Techonology Jaipur, Jaipur, India; Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon; Finance and Accounting Area, Indian Institute of Management Trichy, Tiruchirappalli, India","Baker H.K., Department of Finance and Real Estate, Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, DC, United States; Kumar S., Department of Management Studies, Malaviya National Instiute of Techonology Jaipur, Jaipur, India, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon; Goyal K., Department of Management Studies, Malaviya National Instiute of Techonology Jaipur, Jaipur, India; Gupta P., Finance and Accounting Area, Indian Institute of Management Trichy, Tiruchirappalli, India","The International Journal of Finance & Economics (IJFE) contributed substantially to its research domain between 1996 and 2021. We conduct a comprehensive bibliometric study to examine IJFE's evolution. We use various science mapping approaches to study its performance, intellectual structure, and determinants of academic influence. IJFE's contributions and impact have grown markedly. Authors affiliated with the United Kingdom and the United States are its most frequent contributors. Authors linked with the International Monetary Fund and the City, University of London top the journal's list of contributors. The keyword ‘exchange rate/real exchange rate’ is the most frequently used in IJFE articles, followed by ‘economic growth.’ IJFE's knowledge structure consists of eight themes: (1) exchange rate mechanism, currency crisis, and capital flows, (2) stock market volatility, (3) effects of credit rating on international financial markets, (4) exchange rate volatility and market efficiency, (5) banking sector efficiency, (6) linkage between financial development and economic growth, (7) technical analysis in the foreign exchange market and R&D investment, and (8) stock markets and environmental sustainability. Using regression analysis, we find five factors positively associated with IJFE citations: lead article in an issue, number of authors, article age, number of tables, and number of references. © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.","bibliometrics; citations; international finance; International Journal of Finance & Economics; performance analysis; regression analysis; thematic structure analysis","United Kingdom; United States; economic growth; financial market; financial services; regression analysis; research and development; stock market","","","","","","","Acedo F.J., Barroso C., Casanueva C., Galan J.L., Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 5, pp. 957-983, (2006); Adler M., Song J., The behavior of emerging market sovereigns' credit default swap premiums and bond yield spreads, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 15, 1, pp. 31-58, (2010); Afonso A., Gomes P., Rother P., Short-and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 16, 1, pp. 1-15, (2011); Alam M.S., Apergis N., Paramati S.R., Fang J., The impacts of R&D investment and stock markets on clean-energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in OECD economies, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 4, pp. 4979-4992, (2021); Alexander C., Dimitriu A., Indexing, cointegration and equity market regimes, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 10, 3, pp. 213-231, (2005); Alexiou C., Vogiazas S., Nellis J.G., Reassessing the relationship between the financial sector and economic growth: Dynamic panel evidence, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23, 2, pp. 155-173, (2018); Ali M.U., Gong Z., Ali M.U., Wu X., Yao C., Fossil energy consumption, economic development, inward FDI impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Pakistan: Testing EKC hypothesis through ARDL model, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 3, pp. 3210-3221, (2021); Almaqtari F.A., Al-Homaidi E.A., Tabash M.I., Farhan N.H., The determinants of profitability of Indian commercial banks: A panel data approach, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 168-185, (2019); Alola A.A., Uzuner G., The housing market and agricultural land dynamics: Appraising with economic policy uncertainty index, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 25, 2, pp. 274-285, (2020); Alonso S., Cabrerizo F.J., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F., h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields, Journal of Informetrics, 3, 4, pp. 273-289, (2009); The pandemic and economic policy uncertainty, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27, 3, pp. 2784-2794; Anastasiou D., Louri H., Tsionas M., Nonperforming loans in the euro area: Are core-periphery banking markets fragmented?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 97-112, (2019); Andersen N., Mapping the expatriate literature: A bibliometric review of the field from 1998 to 2017 and identification of current research fronts, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32, 22, pp. 4687-4724, (2019); Arestis P., Demetriades P., Fattouh B., Mouratidis K., The impact of financial liberalization policies on financial development: Evidence from developing economics, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 7, 2, pp. 109-121, (2002); Arouri M.E.H., Rault C., Oil prices and stock markets in GCC countries: Empirical evidence from panel analysis, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 3, pp. 242-253, (2012); Artis M.J., Zhang W., International business cycles and the ERM: Is there a European business cycle?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2, 1, pp. 1-16, (1997); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Goyal K., Sharma A., International review of financial analysis: A retrospective evaluation between 1992 and 2020, International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, (2021); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pandey N., A bibliometric analysis of European financial Managementʼs first 25 years, European Financial Management, 26, 5, pp. 1224-1260, (2020); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pandey N., Thirty years of the global finance journal: A bibliometric analysis, Global Finance Journal, 47, (2021); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pandey N., Forty years of the journal of futures markets: A bibliometric overview, Journal of Futures Markets, 41, 7, pp. 1027-1054, (2021); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pandey N., Thirty years of Small business economics: A bibliometric overview, Small Business Economics, 56, 1, pp. 487-517, (2021); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pandey N., Karus S., Contemporary accounting research: A retrospective between 1984 and 2021 using bibliometric analysis, Contemporary Accounting Research, (2022); Baker H.K., Kumar S., Pattnaik D., Twenty-five years of the journal of corporate finance: A scientometric analysis, Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, (2021); Bartol T., Budimir G., Dekleva-Smrekar D., Pusnik M., Juznic P., Assessment of research fields in Scopus and web of science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia, Scientometrics, 98, 2, pp. 1491-1504, (2014); Bask M., A case for interest rate inertia in monetary policy, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 19, 2, pp. 140-159, (2014); Beine M., Lahaye J., Laurent S., Neely C.J., Palm F.C., Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility, its continuous and jump components, International journal of finance & economics, 12, 2, pp. 201-223, (2007); Bernard H., Gerlach S., Does the term structure predict recessions? The international evidence, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 3, 3, pp. 195-215, (1998); Bikker J.A., Vervliet T.M., Bank profitability and risk-taking under low interest rates, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23, 1, pp. 3-18, (2018); Bouri E., Gil-Alana L.A., Gupta R., Roubaud D., Modelling long memory volatility in the bitcoin market: Evidence of persistence and structural breaks, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 412-426, (2019); Boyd D., Caporale G.M., Smith R., Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: Cointegration and the Marshall–Lerner condition, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6, 3, pp. 187-200, (2001); Bredin D., Hyde S., Nitzsche D., O'Reilly G., European monetary policy surprises: The aggregate and sectoral stock market response, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 14, 2, pp. 156-171, (2009); Burton B., Kumar S., Pandey N., Twenty-five years of the European journal of finance (EJF): A retrospective analysis, European Journal of Finance, 26, 18, pp. 1817-1841, (2020); Callon M., Courtial J.P., Turner W.A., Bauin S., From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Social Science Information, 22, 2, pp. 191-235, (1983); Calvo G.A., Capital flows and macroeconomic management: Tequila lessons, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1, 3, pp. 207-223, (1996); Caporale G.M., Rault C., Sova A.D., Sova R., Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from 10 new European Union members, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20, 1, pp. 48-60, (2015); Cavallo E.A., Valenzuela P., The determinants of corporate risk in emerging markets: An option-adjusted spread analysis, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 15, 1, pp. 59-74, (2010); Chan K.C., Chang C.H., Lo Y.L., A retrospective evaluation of European financial management (1995–2008), European Financial Management, 15, 3, pp. 676-691, (2009); Cheung Y.W., Chinn M.D., Marsh I.W., How do UK-based foreign exchange dealers think their market operates?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 4, pp. 289-306, (2004); Cisneros L., Ibanescu M., Keen C., Lobato-Calleros O., Niebla-Zatarain J., Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: Mapping and analyzing authors' networks, Scientometrics, 117, 2, pp. 919-951, (2018); Coakley J., Kulasi F., Smith R., The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle and capital mobility: A review, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 3, 2, pp. 169-188, (1998); Conlon D.E., Morgeson F.P., McNamara G., Wiseman R.M., Skilton P.F., From the editors: Examining the impact and role of special issue and regular journal articles in the field of management, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 5, pp. 857-872, (2006); Corbet S., Dowling M., Gao X., Huang S., Lucey B., Vigne S.A., An analysis of the intellectual structure of research on the financial economics of precious metals, Resources Policy, 63, (2019); Cortez M.C., Silva F., Areal N., Socially responsible investing in the global market: The performance of US and European funds, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 3, pp. 254-271, (2012); Crane D., Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis, American Sociological Review, 34, 3, pp. 335-352, (1969); Dang C., Li Z., Drivers of research impact: Evidence from the top three finance journals, Accounting & Finance, 60, 3, pp. 2759-2809, (2020); Danielsson J., Love R., Feedback trading, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 1, pp. 35-53, (2006); Demetriades P., Law S.H., Finance, institutions and economic development, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 3, pp. 245-260, (2006); Didier T., Love I., Martinez Peria M.S., What explains comovement in stock market returns during the 2007–2008 crisis?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 2, pp. 182-202, (2012); Donthu N., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Pandey N., Lim W.M., How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines, Journal of Business Research, 133, pp. 285-296, (2021); Donthu N., Kumar S., Pattnaik D., Campagna C., Journal of marketing theory and practice: A retrospective of 2005–2019, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 28, 2, pp. 117-137, (2020); Donthu N., Kumar S., Pattnaik D., Lim W.M., A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from psychology & marketing, Psychology & Marketing, 38, 5, pp. 834-865, (2021); Dooley M.P., Folkerts-Landau D., Garber P., The revived Bretton woods system, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 4, pp. 307-313, (2004); Doukas J.A., Walter A., European financial management association (EFMA) annual meetings: A retrospective evaluation, European Financial Management, 21, 4, pp. 790-810, (2015); Du J., Lu Y., Tao Z., FDI location choice: Agglomeration vs. institutions, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 13, 1, pp. 92-107, (2008); Edison H.J., Do indicators of financial crises work? An evaluation of an early warning system, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8, 1, pp. 11-53, (2003); Egghe L., Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics, 69, 1, pp. 131-152, (2006); Eichengreen B., Leblang D., Capital account liberalization and growth: Was Mr. Mahathir right?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8, 3, pp. 205-224, (2003); Ellegaard O., Wallin J.A., The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?, Scientometrics, 105, 3, pp. 1809-1831, (2015); Engel C., Hakkio C.S., The distribution of exchange rates in the EMS, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1, 1, pp. 55-67, (1996); Evans M.D., Lyons R.K., Understanding order flow, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 1, pp. 3-23, (2006); Ferrando A., Ruggieri A., Financial constraints and productivity: Evidence from euro area companies, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23, 3, pp. 257-282, (2018); Flood R., Marion N., Perspectives on the recent currency crisis literature, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, 1, pp. 1-26, (1999); Franceschet M., A cluster analysis of scholar and journal bibliometric indicators, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 10, pp. 1950-1964, (2009); Franceschet M., A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on web of science and Google scholar, Scientometrics, 83, 1, pp. 243-258, (2010); Fratzscher M., Financial market integration in Europe: On the effects of EMU on stock markets, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 7, 3, pp. 165-193, (2002); Fratzscher M., On currency crises and contagion, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8, 2, pp. 109-129, (2003); Gagnon J.E., Ihrig J., Monetary policy and exchange rate pass-through, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 4, pp. 315-338, (2004); Gallego F.A., Hernandez F.L., Microeconomic effects of capital controls: The Chilean experience during the 1990 s, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8, 3, pp. 225-253, (2003); Garcia-Lillo F., Claver-Cortes E., Marco-Lajara B., Ubeda-Garcia M., Identifying the ‘knowledge base’ or ‘intellectual structure’ of research on international business, 2000–2015: A citation/co-citation analysis of JIBS, International Business Review, 28, pp. 713-726, (2019); Gehrig T., Menkhoff L., Extended evidence on the use of technical analysis in foreign exchange, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 4, pp. 327-338, (2006); Glanzel W., Schubert A., A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes, Scientometrics, 56, 3, pp. 357-367, (2003); Goldberg M.D., Frydman R., Macroeconomic fundamentals and the DM/$ exchange rate: Temporal instability and the monetary model, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6, 4, pp. 421-435, (2001); Goyal K., Kumar S., Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45, 1, pp. 80-105, (2021); Gunduz I., Stock market transmission channel of monetary policy: Empirical evidence from Turkey, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 4, pp. 6421-6443, (2021); Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Multivariate data analysis, (2018); Hegwood N.D., Papell D.H., Quasi purchasing power parity, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 3, 4, pp. 279-289, (1998); Hirsh J.E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 46, pp. 16569-16572, (2005); Hoffman D.L., Holbrook M.B., The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 4, pp. 505-517, (1993); Hota P.K., Subramanian B., Narayanamurthy G., Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis, Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 1, pp. 89-114, (2020); Hwang S., Satchell S.E., Modelling emerging market risk premia using higher moments, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, 4, pp. 271-296, (1999); Imam P.A., Shock from graying: Is the demographic shift weakening monetary policy effectiveness?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20, 2, pp. 138-154, (2015); Islami M., Kurz-Kim J.R., A single composite financial stress indicator and its real impact in the euro area, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 19, 3, pp. 204-211, (2014); Jalilian H., Kirkpatrick C., Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 7, 2, pp. 97-108, (2002); Jansen D.J., De Haan J., Look who's talking: ECB communication during the first years of EMU, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 3, pp. 219-228, (2006); Kanas A., Hassan Al-Tamimi H.A., Albaity M., Mallek R.S., Bank competition, stability, and intervention quality, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 568-587, (2019); Kempa B., Nelles M., Pierdzioch C., Exchange rate target zones and stock price volatility, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, 4, pp. 297-311, (1999); Kessler M.M., Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (1963); Kumar S., Lim W.M., Pandey N., Christopher Westland J., 20 years of electronic commerce research, Electronic Commerce Research, 21, 1, pp. 1-40, (2021); Kumar S., Lim W.M., Sivarajah U., Kaur J., Artificial intelligence and blockchain integration in business: Trends from a bibliometric-content analysis, Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-26, (2022); Kumar S., Marrone M., Liu Q., Pandey N., Twenty years of the international journal of accounting information systems: A bibliometric analysis, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 39, pp. 1-19, (2020); Kumar S., Pandey N., Burton B., Sureka R., Research patterns and intellectual structure of managerial auditing journal: A retrospective using bibliometric analysis during 1986-2019, Managerial Auditing Journal, 36, 2, pp. 280-313, (2021); Kusi B.A., Opoku-Mensah M., Does credit information sharing affect funding cost of banks? Evidence from African banks, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23, 1, pp. 19-28, (2018); Levin J.H., A model of inflation targeting in an open economy, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 4, pp. 347-362, (2004); Levine R., Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 2, pp. 688-726, (1997); Levine-Clark M., Gil E.L., A comparative citation analysis of web of science, Scopus, and Google scholar, Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14, 1, pp. 32-46, (2008); Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L., Wagner C.S., Generating clustered journal maps: An automated system for hierarchical classification, Scientometrics, 110, 3, pp. 1601-1614, (2017); Li Y., Giles D.E., Modelling volatility spillover effects between developed stock markets and Asian emerging stock markets, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20, 2, pp. 155-177, (2015); Lim W.M., Kumar S., Ali F., Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘What,’ ‘why,’ and ‘how to contribute’, The Service Industries Journal, 42, 7-8, pp. 481-513, (2022); Lim W.M., Kumar S., Verma S., Chaturvedi R., Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review, Psychology & Marketing, 39, 6, pp. 1129-1155, (2022); Madaleno M., Pinho C., International stock market indices comovements: A new look, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 1, pp. 89-102, (2012); Martinez-Lopez F.J., Merigo J.M., Valenzuela-Fernandez L., Nicolas C., Fifty years of the European journal of marketing: A bibliometric analysis, European Journal of Marketing, 52, 1-2, pp. 439-468, (2018); Menkhoff L., Examining the use of technical currency analysis, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2, 4, pp. 307-318, (1997); Meyer M., Waldkirch R.W., Duscher I., Just A., Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 51, pp. 24-46, (2018); Mills T.C., Technical analysis and the London stock exchange: Testing trading rules using the FT30, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2, 4, pp. 319-331, (1997); Mody A., Taylor M.P., Kim J.Y., Modelling fundamentals for forecasting capital flows to emerging markets, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6, 3, pp. 201-216, (2001); Mohsin M., Naseem S., Zia-ur-Rehman M., Baig S.A., Salamat S., The crypto-trade volume, GDP, energy use, and environmental degradation sustainability: An analysis of the top 20 crypto-trader countries, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28, 1, pp. 651-667, (2023); Mohsin M., Nurunnabi M., Zhang J., Sun H., Iqbal N., Iram R., Abbas Q., The evaluation of efficiency and value addition of IFRS endorsement towards earnings timeliness disclosure, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 2, pp. 1793-1807, (2021); Mukherjee D., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Goyal K., Mapping five decades of international business and management research on India: A bibliometric analysis and future directions, Journal of Business Research, 145, pp. 864-891, (2022); Murshed M., Abbass K., Rashid S., Modelling renewable energy adoption across south Asian economies: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 4, pp. 5425-5450, (2021); Nautz D., Offermanns C.J., The dynamic relationship between the euro overnight rate, the ECB's policy rate and the term spread, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 12, 3, pp. 287-300, (2007); Nikkinen J., Pynnonen S., Ranta M., Vahamaa S., Cross-dynamics of exchange rate expectations: A wavelet analysis, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 16, 3, pp. 205-217, (2011); Norris M., Oppenheim C., Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences' literature, Journal of Informetrics, 1, 2, pp. 161-169, (2007); Oberlechner T., Importance of technical and fundamental analysis in the European foreign exchange market, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6, 1, pp. 81-93, (2001); Olmo J., Pilbeam K., Uncovered interest parity and the efficiency of the foreign exchange market: A re-examination of the evidence, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 16, 2, pp. 189-204, (2011); Ornelas J.R.H., Silva Junior A.F., Fernandes J.L.B., Yes, the choice of performance measure does matter for ranking of U.S. mutual funds, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 1, pp. 61-72, (2012); Palacios-Callender M., Roberts S.A., Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: Understanding relations between origin and destination countries, Scientometrics, 117, 2, pp. 745-769, (2018); Paramati S.R., Alam M.S., Hammoudeh S., Hafeez K., Long-run relationship between R&D investment and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the European Union member countries, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 4, pp. 5775-5792, (2021); Paramati S.R., Nguyen T.P.T., Does financial market growth improve income distribution? A comparison of developed and emerging market economies of the global sample, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 629-646, (2019); Quinn D.P., Capital account liberalization and financial globalization, 1890–1999: A synoptic view, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8, 3, pp. 189-204, (2003); Raghutla C., Chittedi K.R., Financial development, real sector and economic growth: Evidence from emerging market economies, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 4, pp. 6156-6167, (2021); Raghutla C., Sakthivel P., Sampath T., Chittedi K.R., Macroeconomic variables and stock prices in emerging economies: A panel analysis, Theoretical and Applied Economics, 25, 3-616, pp. 91-100, (2018); Ramos-Rodriguez A.-R., Ruiz-Navarro J., Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 10, pp. 981-1004, (2004); Rapach D.E., Wohar M.E., The persistence in international real interest rates, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 4, pp. 339-346, (2004); Remolona E.M., Scatigna M., Wu E., A ratings-based approach to measuring sovereign risk, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 13, 1, pp. 26-39, (2008); Rezaee M.M.F., Abbasi E., The effects of stagflation on real and accrual-based earnings management, Journal of Management Accounting, 10, 33, pp. 123-139, (2017); Rialp A., Merigo J.M., Cancino C.A., Urbano D., Twenty-five years (1992–2016) of the international business review: A bibliometric overview, International Business Review, 28, 6, pp. 1-28, (2019); Ringle C.M., Wende S., Becker J.M., SmartPLS 3, (2015); Rosenzweig S., Grinstein A., Ofek E., Social network utilization and the impact of academic research in marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 4, pp. 818-839, (2016); Russell-Bennett R., Baron S., Editorial: The importance of the snappy title, Journal of Services Marketing, 30, 5, pp. 477-479, (2016); Sager M.J., Taylor M.P., Under the microscope: The structure of the foreign exchange market, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 11, 1, pp. 81-95, (2006); Sarhan A.A., Ntim C.G., Al-Najjar B., Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance, and executive pay, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 2, pp. 761-786, (2019); Sarno L., Adjustment costs and nonlinear dynamics in the demand for money: Italy, 1861–1991, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, 2, pp. 155-177, (1999); Schwert G.W., The journal of financial economics, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3, pp. 369-424, (1993); Sercu P., International finance: Theory into practice, (2009); Shahbaz M., Mahalik M.K., Shahzad S.J.H., Hammoudeh S., Does the environmental Kuznets curve exist between globalization and energy consumption? Global evidence from the cross-correlation method, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 540-557, (2019); Shahbaz M., Sinha A., Kontoleon A., Decomposing scale and technique effects of economic growth on energy consumption: Fresh evidence from developing economies, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27, 2, pp. 1848-1869, (2020); Shi Y., Ahmed K., Paramati S.R., Determinants of stock market development and price volatility in ASEAN plus three countries: The role of institutional quality, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 1, pp. 560-572, (2021); Shrestha P.K., Semmler W., Monetary policy and international reserves: Empirical evidence from east Asian countries, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20, 3, pp. 191-205, (2015); Slesman L., Baharumshah A.Z., Wohar M.E., Capital inflows and economic growth: Does the role of institutions matter?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20, 3, pp. 253-275, (2015); Small H., Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 4, pp. 265-269, (1973); Sorge M., Gadanecz B., The term structure of credit spreads in project finance, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 13, 1, pp. 68-81, (2008); Steiner M., Heinke V.G., Event study concerning international bond price effects of credit rating actions, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6, 2, pp. 139-157, (2001); Stremersch S., Camacho N., Vanneste S., Verniers I., Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32, 1, pp. 64-77, (2015); Stremersch S., Verniers I., Verhoef P.C., The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact, Journal of Marketing, 71, 3, pp. 171-193, (2007); Strozzi F., Colicchia C., Creazza A., Noe C., Literature review on the ‘smart factory’ concept using bibliometric tools, International Journal of Production Research, 55, 22, pp. 6572-6591, (2017); Tahamtan I., Safipour Afshar A., Ahamdzadeh K., Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature, Scientometrics, 107, 3, pp. 1195-1225, (2016); Taylor M.P., Sarno L., International real interest rate differentials, purchasing power parity and the behaviour of real exchange rates: The resolution of a conundrum, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 1, pp. 15-23, (2004); Ullah A., Zhao X., Abdul Kamal M., Zheng J., Environmental regulations and inward FDI in China: Fresh evidence from the asymmetric autoregressive distributed lag approach, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27, 1, pp. 1340-1356, (2022); Valtakoski A., The evolution and impact of qualitative research in journal of services marketing, Journal of Services Marketing, 34, 1, pp. 8-23, (2019); Van Gool J., Verbeke W., Sercu P., Baesens B., Credit scoring for microfinance: Is it worth it?, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 2, pp. 103-123, (2012); Vesali S., Torabi M., The effects of bank sanctions on the economy and the banking system, Journal of Bank and Economics, 111, pp. 38-44, (2011); Vigfusson R., Switching between chartists and fundamentalists: A Markov regime-switching approach, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2, 4, pp. 291-305, (1997); Wen F., Min F., Zhang Y.J., Yang C., Crude oil price shocks, monetary policy, and China's economy, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 2, pp. 812-827, (2019); Wen F., Yang X., Zhou W.X., Tail dependence networks of global stock markets, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 1, pp. 558-567, (2019); Worthington A., Higgs H., Transmission of equity returns and volatility in Asian developed and emerging markets: A multivariate GARCH analysis, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9, 1, pp. 71-80, (2004); Wu J.L., Chen S.L., Are real exchange rates stationary based on panel unit-root tests? Evidence from Pacific Basin countries, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, 3, pp. 243-252, (1999); Xu X., Chen X., Jia F., Brown S., Gong Y., Xu Y., Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 204, pp. 160-173, (2018); Yamori N., Harimaya K., Tomimura K., Corporate governance structure and efficiencies of cooperative banks, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 22, 4, pp. 368-378, (2017)","H.K. Baker; Finance, Department of Finance and Real Estate, Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 20016, United States; email: kbaker@american.edu","","John Wiley and Sons Ltd","","","","","","10769307","","","","English","Int. J. Financ. Econ.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85141645581"
"Cricelli L.; Greco M.; Grimaldi M.; Llanes Dueñas L.P.","Cricelli, Livio (6505918559); Greco, Marco (36951631100); Grimaldi, Michele (25652968000); Llanes Dueñas, Leidy Paola (57200106777)","6505918559; 36951631100; 25652968000; 57200106777","Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities","2018","Journal of Intellectual Capital","19","1","","71","95","24","79","10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85039715473&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-02-2017-0037&partnerID=40&md5=459ae3aa6ef3780c42d56488246c4696","University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; Department of General Economics, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain","Cricelli L., University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; Greco M., Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; Grimaldi M., University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; Llanes Dueñas L.P., Department of General Economics, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and performance of public universities in emerging countries in order to identify patterns and provide recommendations that may turn the universities’ IC into development opportunities, in terms of research, innovation, and education. Design/methodology/approach: The analysis targeted the whole population of the public universities in the Republic of Colombia. A cluster analysis, based on five performance variables, has been conducted. Then, the IC of the universities pertaining to the three resulting clusters has been compared. Subsequently, for each performance variable, the IC of above-average and below-average universities has been benchmarked. Findings: The results of this study show how different aspects of IC are associated with University performance. Among the many, the authors found that universities should achieve a critical mass to obtain outstanding research and innovation results. The findings also identify the particular importance of both students and scholars’ international mobility programs for most of the performance variables. Social implications: This study provides a baseline for the assessment of the impact on society of the IC available in the universities of emerging countries. The application may serve as a guide in the choice of public policies, dedicated to the strengthening of the universities’ IC in order to improve their performance. Originality/value: This paper proposes an innovative model to analyze the relationship between IC and university performance in emerging countries. The model identifies the association between the IC accrued in the universities and their capability of transferring it to the society under the form of science, innovation, and education. © 2018, © Emerald Publishing Limited.","Education; Emerging countries; Intellectual capital; Republic of Colombia; Universities; University performance","","","","","","Executive Agency for Higher Education and Research Funding of Romania; Quality Assurance in Higher Education","The ICMM for universities (Perez et al., 2015) is a flexible framework for defining and implementing IC measurement and management approaches, as a part of the strategic management of universities, under the “Quality Assurance in Higher Education through Habilitation and Auditing” project framework, initiated by the Executive Agency for Higher Education and Research Funding of Romania.","Abeysekera I., Intellectual capital reporting between a developing and developed nation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 2, pp. 329-345, (2007); Agostini L., Nosella A., Filippini R., Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 400-418, (2017); Alcaniz L., Gomez F., Roslender R., Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: a backward look and a proposal for going forward, Accounting Forum, 35, 2, pp. 104-117, (2011); Araujo A., Gestion del conocimiento, universidad y empresa, (2000); Aubert J.E., Reiffers J.L., Knowledge Economies in the Middle East and North Africa: Toward new Development Strategies, (2003); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bounfour A., Edvinsson L., Marr B., A public policy perspective on intellectual capital, Perspectives on Intellectual Capital, pp. 170-183, (2005); Bratianu C., The intellectual capital of universities, The Annals of the University of Oradea, pp. 63-70, (2009); Bucheli V., Diaz A., Calderon J.P., Lemoine P., Valdivia J.A., Villaveces J.L., Zarama R., Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: an intellectual capital-based approach, Scientometrics, 91, 2, pp. 369-382, (2012); Bueno E., Salmador M.P., Longo M.S., Advances in the identification and measurement of intellectual capital and future developments in the intellectual capital research agenda: experience of the intellectus model and proposal of a synthetic index, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 3, pp. 339-349, (2014); Campos E.B., Gestión del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos Públicos de Investigación, (2003); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de economía aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Cardenas I.C., Al-jibouri S.S., Halman J.I., van Tol F.A., Capturing and integrating knowledge for managing risks in tunnel works, Risk Analysis, 33, 1, pp. 92-108, (2013); Guía para el reconocimiento y medición de grupos de investigación e investigadores, (2012); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Davidsson P., Honig B., The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 3, pp. 301-331, (2003); Drucker P.F., Post-Capitalist Society, (1994); Drucker P.F., Managing in the Next Society, (2012); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, European Management Journal, 14, 4, pp. 356-364, (1996); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 109-123, (2000); RICARDIS: reporting intellectual capital to augment research, development and innovation in SMEs: report to the commission of the high level expert group on RICARDIS, (2006); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a University, (2005); Feng H.I., Chen C.S., Wang C.H., Chiang H.C., The role of intellectual capital and university technology transfer offices in university-based technology transfer, The Service Industries Journal, 32, 6, pp. 899-917, (2012); Glewwe P., Schools and skills in developing countries: education policies and socioeconomic outcomes, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 2, pp. 436-482, (2002); Gonzalez J.M., Rodriguez M.D., Modelos de Capital Intelectual y sus indicadores en la universidad pública, Cuadernos de Administración, 26, 43, pp. 113-128, (2011); Hernandez V.R., Orozco G.M., Henao J.F., Ramirez N.C., Estado actual del capital intelectual y la gestión del conocimiento en las universidades del Risaralda, Memorias, 10, 3, pp. 49-65, (2008); Itami H., Mobilizing Invisible Assets, (1987); Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J., Finding Groups in Data. An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, (1990); Kianto A., What do we really mean by the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital?, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4, 4, pp. 342-356, (2007); Koch G., Leitner K., Bornemann M., Measuring and reporting intangible assets and results in a European contract research organisation, (2000); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.-H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2003); Lu W., Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan, Economic Modelling, 29, 4, pp. 1081-1089, (2012); McGillivray M., The human development index: yet another redundant composite development indicator?, World Development, 19, 10, pp. 1461-1468, (1991); Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C., Theriou G., The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 1, pp. 132-151, (2011); Makles A., Stata tip 110: how to get the optimal k-means cluster solution, The Stata Journal, 12, 2, pp. 347-351, (2012); Maldonado J.R., Consideraciones para la medición del capital intelectual en el sector público, el caso de las universidades, Universidades, 63, 55, pp. 56-67, (2013); Measuring intangibles to understand and improve innovation management (MERITUM), (2001); Propuesta metodológica para la distribución de recursos artículo 87 de la ley 30 de 1992 vigencia 2013, (2013); Marr B., Impacting Future Value: How to Manage your Intellectual Capital, (2008); Misas G., La educación superior en Colombia: análisis y estrategias para su desarrollo, (2004); Morales M.R., Sanabria P.R., Plata A.P., Determinantes de la transferencia de propiedad industrial al sector productivo en universidades públicas colombianas, Cuadernos de Administración, 30, 51, pp. 8-70, (2014); Mouritsen J., Johansen M.R., Larsen H.T., Bukh P.N., Reading an intellectual capital statement: describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 4, pp. 359-383, (2001); The Knowledge-Based Economy, (1996); Science, technology and industry outlook. IV.10. Science and innovation: Colombia, (2012); Ortega G.P., Los activos intangibles y el capital intelectual: Una aproximación a los retos de su contabilización, Saber Ciencia y Libertad, 8, 1, pp. 143-166, (2013); Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Santos Penalver J.F., Propuesta de un Informe de Capital Intelectual para las instituciones de educación superior españolas, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 31, 2, pp. 525-554, (2013); Ramirez Corcoles Y., Santos Penalver J.F., Tejada A., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of intellectual capital”, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities: a new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Sanchez M.P., Papel de los intangibles y el capital intelectual en la creación y difusión del conocimiento en las organizaciones, Situación actual y retos de futuro”, Arbor, 184, 732, pp. 575-594, (2008); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., La gestión estratégica de la universidad contemporánea: reflexiones sobre la potencialidad de los modelos de capital intelectual, Revista de Investigación en Gestión de la Innovación y Tecnología, 42, pp. 1-10, (2007); Sanchez-Torres J.M., Rivera Torres S.C., A model for measuring research capacity using an intellectual capital-based approach in a Colombian higher education institution, Innovar, 19, 1, pp. 179-197, (2009); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Seleim A., Ashour A., Bontis N., Intellectual capital in Egyptian software firms, The Learning Organization, 11, 4-5, pp. 332-346, (2004); Silvestri A., Veltri S., The intellectual capital report within universities: comparing experiences, Economic Science Series, 20, 2, pp. 618-624, (2011); Stahle P., Bounfour A., Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 2, pp. 164-177, (2008); Stewart T., The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 509-533, (1997); Tezanos V.S., Sumner A., Revisiting the meaning of development: a multidimensional taxonomy of developing countries, Journal of Development Studies, 49, 12, pp. 1728-1745, (2013); Tovar R.V., Intellectual capital model for research in public universities in the Colombian Caribbean Coast, Actualizaciones investigativas en educación, 17, 1, pp. 1-27, (2016); Vidrascu P.A., Intellectual capital, an intangible item not reflected in the financial statements of the organizational structure, Internal Auditing and Risk Management, 42, 1, pp. 169-177, (2016); Weber A.S., The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 2589-2594, (2011); Whiting R.H., Hansen P., Sen A., A tool for measuring SMEs’ reputation, engagement and goodwill, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 170-188, (2017); Wu H.Y., Chen J.K., Chen I.S., Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese universities: a hybrid fuzzy model application, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2, pp. 1635-1642, (2010)","M. Greco; Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy; email: m.greco@unicas.it","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85039715473"
"Guerrero M.; Herrera F.; Urbano D.","Guerrero, Maribel (23469313300); Herrera, Fernando (57193962903); Urbano, David (23490718900)","23469313300; 57193962903; 23490718900","Does policy enhance collaborative-opportunistic behaviours? Looking into the intellectual capital dynamics of subsidized industry–university partnerships","2021","Journal of Intellectual Capital","22","6","","1055","1081","26","8","10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0254","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85106303506&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-07-2020-0254&partnerID=40&md5=e0ed36ac77ad774d873b51e4283c90cc","Facultad de Economia y Negocios, Universidad del Desarrollo, Northumbria Centre for Innovation, Regional Transformation and Entrepreneurship (iNCITE), Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM), Campus Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico; Department of Business, School of Economics and Business, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation Research (CREIS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain","Guerrero M., Facultad de Economia y Negocios, Universidad del Desarrollo, Northumbria Centre for Innovation, Regional Transformation and Entrepreneurship (iNCITE), Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Santiago, Chile; Herrera F., Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM), Campus Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico; Urbano D., Department of Business, School of Economics and Business, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation Research (CREIS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain","Purpose: Little is known about how subsidies enhance both collaborative and opportunistic behaviours within subsidized industry–university partnerships, and how partners' behaviours influence the intellectual capital dynamics within subsidized industry–university. Based on these theoretical foundations, this study expects to understand intellectual capital’s (IC's) contribution as a dynamic or systemic process (inputs?outputs?outcomes) within subsided university–industry partnerships. Especially to contribute to these ongoing academic debates, this paper analyses how collaborative and opportunistic behaviours within industry–university partnerships influence the intellectual capital dynamics (inputs, outputs and outcomes) of the subsidized projects. Design/methodology/approach: By combining two sources of information about 683 Mexican subsidized industry–university partnerships from 2009 to 2016, this study adopted the structural equation modelling (SEM) to analyse the effect of collaborative vs opportunistic behaviours in intellectual capital dynamics within subsidized projects. Findings: Our results show three tendencies about the bright/dark side of subsidies within the Mexican industry–university partnerships. The first tendency shows how collaborative behaviours positively influence intellectual capital dynamics within subsidized industry–university partnerships. The second tendency shows how opportunistic behaviours influence intellectual capital impacts (performance) and return to society (job creation). The third tendency shows how initial inputs of subsidized projects generate some expected socio-economic returns that pursued the subsidies (mediation effect of intellectual capital outputs). Research limitations/implications: This research has three limitations that provide a future research agenda. The main limitations were associated with our sources of information. The first limitation, we did not match subsidized partnerships (focus group) and non-subsidized partnerships (control group). A qualitative analysis should help understand the effect of subsidies on intellectual capital and partnerships' behaviours. The second limitation, our measures of collaborative/opportunistic behaviours as well as intellectual capital dynamics should be improved by balancing traditional and new metrics in future research. The third limitation is that in emerging economies, the quality of institutions could influence the submission/selection of subsidies and generate negative externalities. Future research should control by geographical dispersion and co-location of subsidies. Practical implications: For enterprise managers, this study offers insights into IC dynamics and behaviours within subsidized industry–university partnerships. The bright side of collaboration behaviours is related to IC's positive impacts on performance and socio-economic returns. The dark side is the IC appropriation behind opportunistic behaviours. Enterprise managers should recognize the relevance of IC management to capture value and reduce costs associated with opportunistic behaviours. For the university community, this study offers potential trends adopted by industry–university partnerships to reinforce universities' innovative transformation processes. Specifically, these trends are related to the legitimization of the university's role in society and contribution to regional development through industry–university partnerships' outcomes. Therefore, university managers should recognize the IC benefits/challenges behind industry–university partnerships. Social implications: For policymakers, the study indirectly shows the role of subsidies for generating/reinforcing intellectual capital outcomes within subsidized industry–university partnerships. The bright side allows evaluating the cost-benefit of this government intervention and the returns to priority industries. The dark side allows for understanding the need for implementing mechanisms to control opportunistic behaviours within subsidized partnerships. Accordingly, policymakers should understand the IC opportunity-costs related to industry–university partnerships for achieving the subsidies' aims. Originality/value: This study contributes to three ongoing academic debates in innovation and management fields. The first debate about how intellectual capital dynamic is stimulated and transferred through the collaborative behaviour within industry–university partnerships in emerging economies. The second debate is about the “dark side” of partnerships stimulated by public programmes in emerging economies. The third debate is about the effectiveness of subsidies on intellectual capital activities/outcomes. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Collaborative-opportunistic behaviours; Emerging economies; Industry–university partnerships; Intellectual capital; Subsidies","","","","","","Economy and Knowledge Department–Catalan Government; Universidad del Desarrollo; Northumbria University; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT; Lunds Universitet; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, MINECO, (2017-SGR-1056, ECO2017-87885-P); Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, ICREA; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, ITESM","Funding text 1: The authors acknowledge the support from CONACYT during the data collection process. The authors also would like to thank the Editor (Marina Dabic) and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that contributed substantially to the development of the manuscripts. Maribel Guerrero acknowledges the support from Universidad del Desarrollo, Northumbria University and Lund University. Fernando Herrera acknowledges financial support for Ph.D. studies from Tecnológico de Monterrey. David Urbano acknowledges the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project ECO2017-87885-P), the Economy and Knowledge Department–Catalan Government (project 2017-SGR-1056) and ICREA under the ICREAAcademia Programme. ; Funding text 2: The authors acknowledge the support from CONACYT during the data collection process. The authors also would like to thank the Editor (Marina Dabic) and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that contributed substantially to the development of the manuscripts. Maribel Guerrero acknowledges the support from Universidad del Desarrollo, Northumbria University and Lund University. Fernando Herrera acknowledges financial support for Ph.D. studies from Tecnol?gico de Monterrey. David Urbano acknowledges the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project ECO2017-87885-P), the Economy and Knowledge Department?Catalan Government (project 2017-SGR-1056) and ICREA under the ICREAAcademia Programme.","Acs Z.J., Braunerhjelm P., Audretsch D.B., Carlsson B., The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 32, 1, pp. 15-30, (2009); Aerts K., Schmidt T., Two for the price of one?: additionality effects of R&D subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany, Research Policy, 37, 5, pp. 806-822, (2008); Arrow K., Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, (1962); Aschhoff B., The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success–do subsidy history and size matter?, (2009); Aschhoff B., Sofka W., Innovation on demand – can public procurement drive market success of innovations?, Research Policy, 38, 8, pp. 1235-1247, (2009); Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P., R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, The American Economic Review, 86, 3, pp. 630-640, (1996); Autio E., Kanninen S., Gustafsson R., First-and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs, Research Policy, 37, 1, pp. 59-76, (2008); Back I., Kohtamaki M., Boundaries of R&D collaboration, Technovation, 45, pp. 15-28, (2015); Baldwin R.E., Robert-Nicoud F., Entry and asymmetric lobbying: why governments pick losers, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, pp. 1064-1093, (2007); Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B., Cooperative R&D and firm performance, Research Policy, 33, 10, pp. 1477-1492, (2004); Bellini E., Piroli G., Pennacchio L., Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 6, pp. 1939-1963, (2019); Bellucci A., Pennacchio L., Zazzaro A., Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs, Small Business Economics, 52, pp. 213-240, (2017); Beltramino N.S., Garcia-Perez-de-Lema D., Valdez-Juarez L.E., The role of IC on process and products innovation. Empirical study in SMEs in an emerging country, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2021); Benavente J.M., Crespi G., Maffioli A., Public Support to Firm-Level Innovation: An Evaluation of the FONTEC Program, (2007); Blankenburg K., IC in German Non-Profit Organisations, (2018); Bogers M., The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 1, pp. 93-117, (2011); Bontis N., Ciambotti M., Palazzi F., Sgro F., IC and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises, Journal of IC, 19, 4, pp. 712-731, (2018); Bornemann M., Alwert K., Will M., Lessons learned in IC management in Germany between 2000 and 2020 – history, applications, outlook, Journal of IC, (2021); Bosio G., Minola T., Origo F., Tomelleri S., Rethinking Entrepreneurial Human Capital: The Role of Innovation and Collaboration, (2018); Brachos D., Kostopoulos K., Eric Soderquist K., Prastacos G., Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 5, pp. 31-44, (2007); Buisseret T.J., Cameron H.M., Georghiou L., What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms, International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 4-6, pp. 587-600, (1995); Busom I., Fernandez-Ribas A., The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships, Research Policy, 37, 2, pp. 240-257, (2008); Callahan C.M., Vendrzyk V.P., Butler M.G., The impact of implied facilities cost of money subsidies on capital expenditures and the cost of debt in the defense industry, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31, 3, pp. 301-319, (2012); Carayannis E.G., Alexander J., Ioannidis A., Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming a strategic government–university-industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France, Technovation, 20, 9, pp. 477-488, (2000); Carayannis E.G., Grigoroudis E., Del Giudice M., Della Peruta M.R., Sindakis S., An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 1, pp. 35-56, (2017); Chen C.C., Peng M.W., Saparito P.A., Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: a cultural perspective on transaction cost economies, Journal of Management, 28, pp. 567-584, (2002); Chen C.J., The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance, R&D Management, 34, 3, pp. 311-321, (2004); Chen C.J., Hsiao Y.C., Chu M.A., Transfer mechanisms and knowledge transfer: the cooperative competency perspective, Journal of Business Research, 67, 12, pp. 2531-2541, (2014); Chen K., Zhang Y., Zhu G., Mu R., Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities?, Technovation, 94, (2020); Chesbrough H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, (2003); Chesbrough H., Lettl C., Ritter T., Value creation and value capture in open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35, 6, pp. 930-938, (2018); Cheung G.W., Lau R.S., Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models, Organizational Research Methods, 11, 2, pp. 296-325, (2008); Choi J., Lee J., Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D, Research Policy, 46, 8, pp. 1465-1478, (2017); Clarysse B., Wright M., Mustar P., Behavioral additionality of R&D subsidies: a learning perspective, Research Policy, 38, 10, pp. 1517-1533, (2009); Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 1-23, (2002); Conner K.R., Prahalad C.K., A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism, Organization Science, 7, pp. 477-501, (1996); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Dabic M., Vlacic B., Scuotto V., Warkentin M., Two decades of the Journal of IC: a bibliometric overview and an agenda for future research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 3, pp. 458-477, (2021); Das S., Sen P.K., Sengupta S., Strategic alliances: a valuable way to manage IC?, Journal of IC, 4, 1, pp. 10-19, (2003); Del Giudice M., Maggioni V., Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view, Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 5, pp. 841-846, (2014); Del Giudice M., Della Peruta M.R., Maggioni V., Collective knowledge and organizational routines within academic communities of practice: an empirical research on science–entrepreneurs, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 3, pp. 260-278, (2013); Dezi L., Ferraris A., Papa A., Vrontis D., The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 2, pp. 360-369, (2021); Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Estados Unidos Mexicanos: Presidencia de la Republica, (2014); Dimos C., Pugh G., The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: a meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature, Research Policy, 45, 4, pp. 797-815, (2016); Dumay J.C., Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 190-210, (2009); Dumay J., Edvinsson L., IC 21: reflections from 21 years of IC practice and theory, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 163-172, (2013); Dussel Peters E., Brid M., Carlos J., Salat I., Sanchez J., Ramirez J.C., La renegociación del TLCAN. Efectos arancelarios y el caso de la cadena del calzado, Investigación Económica, 77, 303, pp. 3-78, (2018); Edler J., James A.D., Understanding the emergence of new science and technology policies: policy entrepreneurship, agenda-setting, and the development of the European Framework Programme, Research Policy, 44, 6, pp. 1252-1265, (2015); Edvinsson L., Corporate Longitude: Navigating the Knowledge Economy, (2002); Falk R., Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities: survey evidence from Austria, Research Policy, 36, 5, pp. 665-679, (2007); Folster S., Do subsidies to cooperative R&D actually stimulate R&D investment and cooperation?, Research Policy, 24, 3, pp. 403-417, (1995); Fox J., Effects analysis in structural equation models, Sociological Methods and Research, 9, pp. 3-28, (1980); Frishammar J., Ericsson K., Patel P.C., The dark side of knowledge transfer: exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects, Technovation, 41, pp. 75-88, (2015); Garcia-Quevedo J., Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence, Kyklos, 57, 1, pp. 87-102, (2004); Gianiodis P.T., Markman G.D., Panagopoulos A., Entrepreneurial universities and overt opportunism, Small Business Economics, 47, 3, pp. 609-631, (2016); Greco M., Grimaldi M., Cricelli L., An analysis of the open innovation effect on enterprise performance, European Management Journal, 34, pp. 501-516, (2016); Guerrero M., Herrera F., Urbano D., Strategic knowledge management within subsidized entrepreneurial university-industry partnerships, Management Decision, 57, 12, pp. 3280-3300, (2019); Guerrero M., Urbano D., The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: an inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, pp. 294-309, (2017); Guerrero M., Urbano D., Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 5, pp. 1347-1366, (2019); Guerrero M., Urbano D., Institutional conditions and social innovations in emerging economies: insights from Mexican enterprises' initiatives for protecting/preventing the effect of violent events, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, pp. 929-957, (2020); Guerrero M., Linan F., Caceres-Carrasco F.R., The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies, Small Business Economics, (2020); Guerrero M., Urbano D., Herrera F., Innovation practices in emerging economies: do university partnerships matter?, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 2, pp. 615-646, (2019); Guo B., Guo J.J., Patterns of technological learning within the knowledge systems of industrial clusters in emerging economies: evidence from China, Technovation, 31, 2, pp. 87-104, (2011); Hall B.H., Maffioli A., Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: evidence from Latin America, European Journal of Development Research, 20, 2, pp. 172-198, (2008); Hall B.H., Moncada-Paterno-Castello P., Montresor S., Vezzani A., Financing constraints, R&D investments and innovative performances: new empirical evidence at the enterprise level for Europe, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25, 3, pp. 183-196, (2016); Hill C.W., Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: implications for transaction cost theory, Academy of Management Review, 15, 3, pp. 500-513, (1990); Hottenrott H., Lopes-Bento C., R&D partnerships and innovation performance: can there be too much of a good thing?, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 6, pp. 773-794, (2016); Irwin D.A., Klenow P.J., High-tech R&D subsidies estimating the effects of sematech, Journal of International Economics, 40, 3-4, pp. 323-344, (1996); Johanson U., Koga C., Skoog M., Henningsson J., The Japanese Government's IC reporting guideline: what are the challenges for firms and capital market agents?, Journal of IC, 7, 4, pp. 474-491, (2006); Kafouros M., Wang C., Mavroudi E., Hong J., Katsikeas C.S., Geographic dispersion and co-location in global R&D portfolios: consequences for firm performance, Research Policy, 47, 7, pp. 1243-1255, (2018); Kamukama N., Ahiauzu A., Ntayi J.M., Competitive advantage: mediator of IC and performance, Journal of IC, 12, 1, pp. 152-164, (2011); Kianto A., Saenz J., Aramburu N., Knowledge-based human resource management practices, IC and innovation, Journal of Business Research, 81, pp. 11-20, (2017); Klerkx L., Aarts N., The interaction of multiple champions in orchestrating innovation networks: conflicts and complementarities, Technovation, 33, 6, pp. 193-210, (2013); Kochenkova A., Grimaldi R., Munari F., Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 3, pp. 407-429, (2016); Kovacs A., Van Looy B., Cassiman B., Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research, Scientometrics, 104, 3, pp. 951-983, (2015); Lerner J., The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program, Journal of Business, 72, 3, pp. 285-318, (1999); Li J., Kozhikode R.K., Developing new innovation models: shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management, Journal of International Management, 15, 3, pp. 328-339, (2009); Love J.H., Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a theoretical note, Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 2, pp. 399-407, (1995); Lui S.S., Wong Y.Y., Liu W., Asset specificity roles in interfirm cooperation: reducing opportunistic behaviour or increasing cooperative behaviour?, Journal of Business Research, 62, 11, pp. 1214-1219, (2009); Magni D., Pezzi A., Vrontis D., Towards a framework of students' co-creation behaviour in higher education institutions, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 12, 2, pp. 119-148, (2020); Magni D., Orlando B., Del Giudice M., Exploiting digital skills in higher education: a case study analysis, IT and the Development of Digital Skills and Competences in Education, pp. 1-20, (2021); Mahmood I.P., Rufin C., Government's dilemma: the role of government in imitation and innovation, Academy of Management Review, 30, 2, pp. 338-360, (2005); Manzari M., Kazemi M., Nazemi S., Pooya A., IC: concepts, components and indicators: a literature review, Management Science Letters, 2, 7, pp. 2255-2270, (2012); Mubarik M.S., Bontis N., Mubarik M., Mahmood T., Intellectual capital and supply chain resilience, Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2021); Nelson R.R., The simple economics of basic scientific research, Journal of Political Economy, 67, pp. 148-163, (1959); Nicotra M., Romano M., Del Giudice M., Schillaci C.E., The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 3, pp. 640-673, (2018); Nieto M.J., Santamaria L., The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation, Technovation, 27, 6, pp. 367-377, (2007); Obeidat B.Y., Tarhini A., Masa'deh R.E., Aqqad N.O., The impact of IC on innovation via the mediating role of knowledge management: a structural equation modelling approach, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 8, 3-4, pp. 273-298, (2017); Knowledge-Based Start-Ups in Mexico, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, (2013); Osterloh M., Frey B.S., Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms, Organization Science, 11, 5, pp. 538-550, (2000); Pawlowsky P., Pflugfelder N.S., Wagner M.H., The ISO 30401 knowledge management systems standard–a new framework for value creation and research?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 3, pp. 506-527, (2021); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., Back to the future of IC research: a systematic literature review, Management Decision, 56, 11, pp. 2502-2583, (2018); Perkmann M., Walsh K., University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 4, pp. 259-280, (2007); Ponzi L.J., The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: a bibliometric study of its early stage of development, Scientometrics, 55, 2, pp. 259-272, (2002); Roos G., Roos J., Measuring your company's intellectual performance, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 413-426, (1997); Rossi M.V., Magni D., IC and value co-creation: an empirical analysis from a marketing perspective, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 3, pp. 147-158, (2017); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Salmi P., The impact of public R&D funding on open innovation, Economia. Seria Management, 15, 1, pp. 142-163, (2012); Santoro G., Bresciani S., Papa A., Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: the moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity, Technovation, 92-93, (2020); Schwartz M., Peglow F., Fritsch M., Gunther J., What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? – project-level evidence from Germany, Technovation, 32, 6, pp. 358-369, (2012); Scuotto V., Del Giudice M., Bresciani S., Meissner D., Knowledge driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes: an explorative view on small to medium enterprises, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, pp. 640-655, (2017); Senge P.M., Forrester J.W., Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models, System Dynamics, TIMS Studies in Management Sciences, 14, pp. 209-228, (1980); Serino L., Papa A., Campanella F., Di Gioia L., The sourcing for collaborative knowledge translation in distributed R&D processes: a cross-regional study, Management Decision, 58, 9, pp. 2027-2048, (2020); Serrat O., A primer on IC, Knowledge Solutions, pp. 197-205, (2017); Shook C.L., Ketchen D.J., Hult G.T., Kacmar K.M., An Assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research, Strategic Management Journal, 25, pp. 397-404, (2004); Siegel D., Guerrero M., The impact of quarantines, lockdowns, and ‘reopenings’ on the commercialization of science: micro and macro issues, Journal of Management Studies, (2021); Sissoko A., R&D subsidies and firm-level productivity: evidence from France, (2011); Sobel M., Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociological Methodology, pp. 290-312, (1982); Soderblom A., Samuelsson M.J., Outcome additionality of early stage subsidies: short-term resources and long-term performance, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013, (2013); Soderblom A., Samuelsson M., Wiklund J., Sandberg R., Inside the black box of outcome additionality: effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance, Research Policy, 44, 8, pp. 1501-1512, (2015); Solitander M., Tidstrom A., Competitive flows of IC in value creating networks, Journal of IC, 11, 1, pp. 23-38, (2010); Stewart T., IC: The Wealth of Nations, (1997); Stewart T.A., IC: The New Wealth of Organizations, (1997); Sutz J., The university-industry-government relations in Latin America, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 279-290, (2000); Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S., Using Multivariate Statistics, (1996); Takalo T., Tanayama T., Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies?, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 1, pp. 16-41, (2010); Torres-Barreto M.L., Mendez-Duron R., Hernandez-Perlines F., Technological impact of R&D grants on utility models, R&D Management, 46, S2, pp. 537-551, (2016); Trigo A., Vence X., Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises, Research Policy, 41, 3, pp. 602-613, (2012); Ullberg E., Edvinsson L., Lin C.Y.Y., IC and IA mapping at the global enterprise level, Intangible Asset Gap in Global Competitiveness, pp. 37-50, (2021); Unger J.M., Rauch A., Frese M., Rosenbusch N., Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta-analytical review, Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 3, pp. 341-358, (2011); Urbano D., Guerrero M., Ferreira J.J., Fernandes C.I., New technology entrepreneurship initiatives: which strategic orientations and environmental conditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape?, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 5, pp. 1577-1602, (2019); Wallsten S.J., The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the small business innovation research program, The RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 1, pp. 82-100, (2000); Whitley R., Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, pp. 497-528, (2002); Wilding R., Humphries A.S., Understanding collaborative supply chain relationships through the application of the Williamson organisational failure framework, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36, 4, pp. 309-329, (2006); Williamson O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications, (1975); Williamson O.E., Transaction cost economics: the comparative contracting perspective, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, 4, pp. 617-625, (1987); Wyatt A., What financial and non-financial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of the evidence, Accounting and Business Research, 38, 3, pp. 217-256, (2008); Xie X., Fang L., Zeng S., Huo J., How does knowledge inertia affect firms product innovation?, Journal of Business Research, 69, 5, pp. 1615-1620, (2016); Yitmen I., IC: a competitive asset for driving innovation in engineering design firms, Engineering Management Journal, 23, 2, pp. 3-19, (2011); Zeng S.X., Xie X.M., Tam C.M., Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs, Technovation, 30, 3, pp. 181-194, (2010)","M. Guerrero; Facultad de Economia y Negocios, Universidad del Desarrollo, Northumbria Centre for Innovation, Regional Transformation and Entrepreneurship (iNCITE), Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Santiago, Chile; email: maribel.guerrero@northumbria.ac.uk","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85106303506"
"Mahdee J.M.; Teague P.","Mahdee, Junainah Mohd (57192482409); Teague, Paul (56262953200)","57192482409; 56262953200","Creating high performance universities: The malaysian experience","2014","Management Education","13","3","","23","34","11","1","10.18848/2327-8005/cgp/v13i03/50864","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85006632106&doi=10.18848%2f2327-8005%2fcgp%2fv13i03%2f50864&partnerID=40&md5=ff4a95622db6267724d4fecd3188e6b5","Management School, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom","Mahdee J.M., Management School, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom; Teague P., Management School, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom","This paper aims to assess the effort of upgrading the performance of Malaysian universities. Two interrelated arguments are developed in the paper as a proposed framework. First, the national public policy framework created to improve the status of higher education is an example of what Sabel and Zeitlin (2011) call Experimentalist Governance. The higher education public policy imposed by the government has given broad discretion to Malaysian universities to set their own targets through 'learning by monitoring'. Second, to upgrade their performance, most universities have sought to deepen the intellectual capital which is argued by Stiles and Kulvisaechana (2003) as improving when innovations at complementary human capital, social capital, and organizational capital are successfully integrated. With the use of a case-study university from Malaysia, this paper portrays the innovations that the university has made. © Common Ground, Junainah Mohd Mahdee, Paul Teague.","Change; Culture; Experimentalist Governance; High Performance Organization; Human Capital; Intellectual Capital; Malaysian Higher Education; Organizational Capital; Social Capital; World Class Universities","","","","","","","","Adler P.S., Kwon S.W., ‘Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept’, Academy of Management Review, 27, 1, pp. 17-40, (2002); Andrews R., “Civic engagement, ethnic heterogeneity, and social capital in urban areas: Evidence from England”, Urban Affairs Review, 44, 3, pp. 428-440, (2009); Aoki M., “Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis”, (2001); Bolino M.C., Turnley W.H., Bloodgood J., Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 27, 4, pp. 505-522, (2002); Boxman Ed A.W., De Graaf P.M., Flap H., ‘‘The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers’’, Social Networks, 13, pp. 51-73, (1991); Bryman A., Bell E., Business Research Methods, (2003); Leana C.R., Van Buren H.J., “Organizational Social Capital And Employment Practices”, The Academy of Management Review, 24, 3, pp. 538-555, (1999); Coleman J.C., ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. S95-S120, (1988); Dess G.D., Picken J.C., “Beyond productivity: How leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital”, (1999); Edwards J.R., “A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 17, pp. 238-274, (1992); Fukuyama F., “Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity”, 1995, (2009); Kay J., “Foundations of Corporate Success”, (1995); Klein D.A., “The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital”, (1998); Larsen I.M., Et al., “Four Basic Dilemmas in University Governance Reform”, Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD, 21, 3, pp. 1-18, (2009); Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266, (1998); Nelson Richard R., Sidney G., Winter “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”, (1982); Podolny J.M., Baron J.N., “Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace”, American Sociological Review, 62, pp. 673-693, (1997); Portes A., “Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology.”, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 1-24, (1998); Putnam R.D., The prosperous community: Social capital and public life’ in the American Prospect, 4, (1993); Sabel C.F., Simon W.H., “Minimalism and Experimentalism in American Public Law”, (2010); Sabel C.F., Zeitlin J., “Experimentalist Governance”, The Oxford Handbook of Governance, (2011); Sandra E., Black & Lisa M. Lynch, ""Measuring Organizational Capital in the New Economy,"" NBER Chapters, Measuring Capital in the New Economy, pp. 205-236, (2005); T.W., “Investment in human capital”, Am. Econ. Rev, 51, pp. 1-17, (1961); Stiles P., Kulvisaechana S., “Human Capital and Performance: A Literature Review”, (2003); Sveiby K.E., The new organisational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets, (1997); Teague P., “The Irish Experiment in Social Partnership”, (2002); Teece D.J., Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, pp. 31-224, (1997); Uzzi B., Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Admin. Sci. Quart, 42, pp. 35-67, (1997); Zammuto R.F., Assessing Organizational Effectiveness: Systems Change, Adaptation, and Strategy, (1982)","","","Common Ground Research Networks","","","","","","23278005","","","","English","Manage. Educ. Int. J.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85006632106"
"Nicolò G.; Ferullo D.; Aversano N.; Ardito N.","Nicolò, Giuseppe (57195628696); Ferullo, Diana (57994153900); Aversano, Natalia (55647167100); Ardito, Nadia (57577925300)","57195628696; 57994153900; 55647167100; 57577925300","Intellectual capital disclosure and its determinants in healthcare organisations – Evidence from Italy","2023","International Journal of Public Sector Management","36","1","","20","45","25","6","10.1108/IJPSM-06-2022-0149","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143396013&doi=10.1108%2fIJPSM-06-2022-0149&partnerID=40&md5=82532709b284145018c60bebde29f6c5","Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy","Nicolò G., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; Ferullo D., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; Aversano N., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; Ardito N., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy","Purpose: The present study aims to extend the knowledge of intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) disclosure practices in the Italian Healthcare Organisations (HCOs) context. The ultimate goal of the study is to provide fresh insight into the possible explanatory factors that may drive the extent of ICD provided by Italian HCOs via the web. Design/methodology/approach: The present study applies a manual content analysis on the websites of a sample of 158 HCOs to determine the level of voluntary ICD. A multivariate regression model is estimated to test the association between different variables – size, gender diversity in top governance positions, financial performance and indebtedness – and the level of ICD provided by sampled HCOs through their official websites. Findings: Content analysis results reveal that – in the absence of mandatory requirements – Italian HCOs tend to use websites to disclose information about IC. Particular attention is devoted to Structural and Relational Capital. The statistical analysis pinpoints that size and indebtedness negatively influence the level of ICD. In contrast, the presence of a female General Manager (GM) positively drives ICD. Also, it is observed that Research and University HCOs and those located in the Italian Northern Regions are particularly prone to discharge accountability on IC through websites. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines voluntary ICD practices through websites in the Italian HCOs' context. Also, since prior studies on IC in the healthcare context are mainly descriptive or normative, this is the first study examining the potential determinants of ICD provided by HCOs in terms of size, gender diversity in top governance positions, financial performance and indebtedness. © 2022, Giuseppe Nicolò, Diana Ferullo, Natalia Aversano and Nadia Ardito.","Healthcare; Hospital; Intellectual capital; Intellectual capital disclosure; Reporting","","","","","","","","Alcaraz-Quiles F.J., Navarro-Galera A., Ortiz-Rodriguez D., Factors determining online sustainability reporting by local governments, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 1, pp. 79-109, (2015); Andrades-Pena F.J., Martinez-Martinez D., Larran M., Herrera J., Determinants of information disclosure by Spanish state-owned enterprises in accordance with legal requirements, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32, 6, pp. 616-634, (2019); Andrades-Pena F.J., Larran Jorge M., Muriel de los Reyes M.J., Calzado Cejas M.Y., Influential variables of sustainability disclosures by Spanish public hospitals, Public Performance and Management Review, 43, 6, pp. 1390-1412, (2020); Andrades-Pena F.J., Larran M., Muriel M.J., Calzado M.Y., Lechuga Sancho M.P., Online sustainability disclosure by Spanish hospitals: an institutionalist approach, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34, 5, pp. 529-545, (2021); Anessi-Pessina E., Cantu E., Multiple logics and accounting mutations in the Italian national health service, Accounting Forum, 41, 1, pp. 8-27, (2017); Araujo J.F.F.E., Tejedo-Romero F., Does gender equality affect municipal transparency: the case of Spain, Public Performance and Management Review, 41, 1, pp. 69-99, (2018); Arena C., Catuogno S., Saggese S., Sarto F., The adoption of e-Health in public hospitals. Unfolding the gender dimension of TMT and line managers, Public Management Review, 23, 10, pp. 1553-1579, (2021); Aribi Z.A., Alqatamin R.M., Arun T., Gender diversity on boards and forward-looking information disclosure: evidence from Jordan, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 2, pp. 205-222, (2018); Aversano N., Nicolo G., Sannino G., Tartaglia-Polcini P., The Integrated Plan in Italian public universities: new patterns in intellectual capital disclosure, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 4, pp. 655-679, (2020); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities: do they go hand in hand?, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, pp. 51-71, (2019); Carlucci D., Schiuma G., Evaluating organisational climate through IC lens: the case of a public hospital, Measuring Business Excellence, 16, 4, pp. 79-90, (2012); Cavicchi C., Healthcare sustainability and the role of intellectual capital: evidence from an Italian regional health service, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 544-563, (2017); Cicchetti A., Gasbarrini A., The healthcare service in Italy: regional variability, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 20, pp. 1-3, (2016); Cohen S., Vlismas O., Analysing the relationship between intellectual capital and performance in local governments, Global Business and Economics Review, 15, 2-3, pp. 233-250, (2013); Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J., Martinez-Ferrero J., The role of media pressure on the disclosure of sustainability information by local governments, Online Information Review, 38, 1, pp. 114-135, (2014); Dameri R.P., Ferrando P.M., Implementing integrated reporting to disclose intellectual capital in health organisations: a case study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 2, pp. 311-336, (2020); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Farrar D.E., Glauber R.R., Multicollinearity in regression analysis: the problem revisited, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 1, pp. 92-107, (1967); Gandia J.L., Archidona M.C., Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils, Online Information Review, 32, 1, pp. 35-57, (2008); Gravili G., Manta F., Cristofaro C.L., Reina R., Toma P., Value that matters: intellectual capital and big data to assess performance in healthcare. An empirical analysis on the European context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 2, pp. 260-289, (2020); Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S., Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, 2, pp. 47-77, (1995); Guillamon M.D., Rios A.M., Gesuele B., Metallo C., Factors influencing social media use in local governments: the case of Italy and Spain, Government Information Quarterly, 3, 33, pp. 460-471, (2016); Guthrie J., Petty R., Yongvanich K., Ricceri F., Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 282-293, (2004); Guthrie J., Petty R., Ricceri F., The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 2, pp. 254-271, (2006); Habersam M., Piber M., Exploring intellectual capital in hospitals: two qualitative case studies in Italy and Austria, European Accounting Review, 12, 4, pp. 753-779, (2003); Krippendorff K., Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, The Sage CommText Series, (1980); Lee A., Neilson J., Tower G., Van der Zahn J.L.M., Is communicating intellectual capital information via the internet viable? Case of Australian private and public hospitals, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 11, 1, pp. 53-78, (2007); Lodhia S., Kaur A., Stone G., The use of social media as a legitimation tool for sustainability reporting: a study of the top 50 Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) listed companies, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 4, pp. 613-632, (2020); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Manes-Rossi F., Citro F., Bisogno M., Intellectual capital in action: evidence from Italian local governments, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 4, pp. 696-713, (2016); Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia-Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 1469-1930, (2018); Manes-Rossi F., Bisogno M., Aversano N., Citro F., Intellectual capital in Italian healthcare: senior managers' perspectives, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33, 6-7, pp. 629-646, (2020); Manita R., Bruna M.G., Dang R., Houanti L.H., Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19, 2, pp. 206-224, (2018); Matos R., Ferreira D., Pedro M.I., Economic analysis of Portuguese public hospitals through the construction of quality, efficiency, access, and financial related composite indicators, Social Indicators Research, 157, 1, pp. 361-392, (2021); Mazzotta R., The communication of intellectual capital in healthcare organisations: what is disclosed and how?, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 9, 1, pp. 23-48, (2018); Mertens W., Quantitative Data Analysis, (2017); Il monitoraggio della spesa sanitaria, (2021); Naciti V., Noto G., Vermiglio C., Barresi G., Gender representation and financial performance: an empirical analysis of public hospitals, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35, 5, pp. 603-621, (2022); Nicolo G., Manes-Rossi F., Christiaens J., Aversano N., Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities, Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 4, pp. 1055-1087, (2020); Nicolo G., Aversano N., Sannino G., Tartaglia-Polcini P., ICD corporate communication and its determinants: evidence from Italian listed companies' websites, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 5, pp. 1209-1232, (2021); Nicolo G., Sannino G., Iorio S.D., Gender diversity and online intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from Italian-listed firms, Journal of Public Affairs, 22, 4, (2021); Nicolo G., Raimo N., Tartaglia-Polcini P., Vitolla F., Unveiling the link between performance and Intellectual Capital disclosure in the context of Italian Public universities, Evaluation and Program Planning, 88, (2021); Paoloni N., Mattei G., Strologo A.D., Celli M., The present and future of intellectual capital in the healthcare sector: a systematic literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 3, pp. 357-379, (2020); Peng T.A., Pike S., Roos G., Intellectual capital and performance indicators: Taiwanese healthcare sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 3, pp. 538-556, (2007); Pirozzi M.G., Ferulano G.P., Intellectual capital and performance measurement in healthcare organisations: an integrated new model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 320-350, (2016); Pizzi S., Caputo F., Venturelli A., Accounting to ensure healthy lives: critical perspective from the Italian National Healthcare System, Corporate Governance, 20, 3, pp. 445-460, (2021); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Sanchez M.P., Determinants of online intellectual capital disclosure by Spanish local governments, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23, 2, pp. 249-289, (2022); Rao K., Tilt C., Board composition and corporate social responsibility: the role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making, Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 2, pp. 327-347, (2016); Schneider A., Samkin G., Intellectual capital reporting by the New Zealand local government sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 3, pp. 456-486, (2008); Serrano-Cinca C., Rueda-Tomas M., Portillo-Tarragona P., Factors influencing edisclosure in local public administrations. Environment and planning C, Government and Policy, 27, 2, pp. 355-378, (2009); Tavares A.F., da Cruz N.F., Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework, Government Information Quarterly, 37, 3, (2020); Tejedo-Romero F., Rodrigues L.L., Craig R., Women directors and disclosure of intellectual capital information, European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23, 3, pp. 123-131, (2017); Toth F., How health care regionalisation in Italy is widening the North–South gap, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 9, 3, pp. 231-249, (2014); Uyar A., Kuzey C., Kilic M., Karaman A.S., Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: disentangling the connection in healthcare, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 6, pp. 1730-1748, (2021); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); Veltri S., Bronzetti G., Sicoli G., Reporting intellectual capital in health care organisations: specifics, lessons learned, and future research perspectives, Journal of Health Care Finance, 38, 2, pp. 80-97, (2011); Zigan K., Macfarlane F., Desombre T., The identification of important intangible resources in hospitals, International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 13, pp. 1162-1181, (2009); Zimmerman J.L., The municipal accounting maze: an analysis of political incentives, Journal of Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 107-144, (1977)","G. Nicolò; Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; email: gnicolo@unisa.it","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","09513558","","","","English","Int. J. Public Sect. Manage.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85143396013"
"Secundo G.; Lombardi R.; Dumay J.; Guthrie A.M J.","Secundo, Giustina (8246738300); Lombardi, Rosa (55565307600); Dumay, Johannes (16237803000); Guthrie A.M, James (8396129000)","8246738300; 55565307600; 16237803000; 8396129000","Reflecting on intellectual capital measurement and management in European universities","2023","Meditari Accountancy Research","31","6","","1827","1845","18","3","10.1108/MEDAR-03-2022-1632","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85152891984&doi=10.1108%2fMEDAR-03-2022-1632&partnerID=40&md5=aff9ac1d955ece6dc40a53c3cb3695d2","Department of Management, Finance and Technology, University LUM Giuseppe Degennaro, Bari, Italy; Department of Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia","Secundo G., Department of Management, Finance and Technology, University LUM Giuseppe Degennaro, Bari, Italy; Lombardi R., Department of Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Dumay J., Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Guthrie A.M J., Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia","Purpose: This paper aims to critically review intellectual capital (IC) accounting research and practices in European public universities, specifically in Spain, Austria and Italy. These three countries represent the majority of IC accounting research related to universities. Design/methodology/approach: This study critically reviews a selection of university-based IC accounting research, applying Alvesson and Deetz’s (2000) critical perspectives of insight, critique and transformative redefinition. Findings: The analysis reveals that European public universities follow the Humboldtian model of higher education, integrating a third mission to society into their traditional roles as teaching and research institutions. This study explored how the emergence of a third mission for the university was conceptualised. This study also provided insights, critique and a transformative redefinition to advance IC as a strategic resource in European public universities. Originality/value: The findings provide academics and policymakers with insights, critique and a transformative redefinition of IC as a strategic resource for European public universities to meet future challenges in an ever-changing world. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.","European public universities; European universities; IC disclosure; Intellectual capital; Intellectual capital accounting; Performance management systems; Strategic resource; Third mission","","","","","","","","Agyemang G., Broadbent J., Management control systems and research management in universities: an empirical and conceptual exploration, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28, 7, pp. 1018-1046, (2015); Alvesson M., Deetz S., Doing Critical Management Research, (2000); Manuale per la valutazione della terza missione nelle università e negli enti di ricerca, (2015); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bornemann M., Wiedenhofer R., Intellectual capital in education: a value chain perspective, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 451-470, (2014); Brammer S., Branicki L., Linnenluecke M., Smith T., Grand challenges in management research: attributes, achievements, and advancement, Australian Journal of Management, 44, 4, pp. 517-533, (2019); Bratianu C., Intellectual capital of the European universities, Trends in European Higher Education Convergence, pp. 24-43, (2014); Burritt R., Guthrie J., Evans E., Christ K., Expanding collaboration between industry and business faculties in Australia, Academic Leadership Series, 8, pp. 9-26, (2017); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Measurement, management and reporting on intangibles. State of the art, Accounting and Business Review, 3, 1, pp. 37-62, (2004); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de Economìa Aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F., Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 3-4, pp. 201-234, (2009); Catasus B., The relevance of IC indicators, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 492-504, (2017); Chiucchi M.S., Dumay J., Unlocking intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 305-330, (2015); DELIBERA n. 112/2010 – Struttura e modalità di redazione del Piano della performance” (articolo 10, comma 1, lettera a), del decreto legislativo 27 ottobre 2009, n. 150), (2010); Clark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organisational Pathways of Transformation, (1998); Capital intelectual y producción científica, (2002); Corazza L., Cisi M., Dumay J., Formal networks: the influence of social learning in meta-organisations from commons protection to commons governance, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 19, 3, pp. 1-16, (2019); Corcoles Y.R., Ponce A.T., Cost–benefit analysis of intellectual capital disclosure: university stakeholders’ view, Revista de Contabilidad, 16, 2, pp. 106-117, (2013); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes D., Leidy P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Del Sordo C., Farneti F., Guthrie J., Pazzi S., Siboni B., Social reports in Italian universities: disclosures and preparers’ perspective, Meditari Accountancy Research, 24, 1, pp. 91-110, (2016); Di Berardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclose third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Dumay J., Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, (2009); Dumay J., Developing strategy to create a public value chain, Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting, pp. 65-83, (2014); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital and strategy as practice: a critical examination, International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 4, 3, pp. 28-37, (2012); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Puntillo P., IC and public sector: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 267-284, (2015); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Rooney J., The critical path of intellectual capital, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital, pp. 21-39, (2017); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Rooney J., The critical path of intellectual capital, The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, pp. 21-39, (2018); Dumay J., Guthrie J., Rooney J., Being critical about intellectual capital accounting in 2020: an overview, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 70, (2020); Edvinsson L., IC 21: reflections from 21 years of IC practice and theory, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 163-172, (2013); Etzkowitz H., Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, Minerva, 21, 2-3, pp. 198-233, (1983); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 109-123, (2000); Reporting intellectual capital to augment research development and innovation in SMEs (RICARDIS) report, (2019); EURAXESS, (2022); Fraenkel-Haeberle C., Die Universität im Mehrebenensystem: Modernisierungsansätze in Deutschland, Italien und Österreich, 226, (2014); Gately C., Cunningham J., Building intellectual capital in incubated technology firms, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, pp. 516-536, (2014); Gowthorpe C., Wider still and wider? A critical discussion of intellectual capital recognition, measurement and control in a boundary theoretical context, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 7, pp. 823-834, (2009); Guthrie J., Ricceri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-92, (2012); Guthrie J., Dumay J., Ricceri F., Nielsen C., The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital: Frontiers of Research, Practice and Knowledge, (2017); Guthrie J., Parker L.D., Dumay J., Milne M.J., What counts for quality in interdisciplinary accounting research in the next decade: a critical review and reflection, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32, 1, pp. 2-25, (2019); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: the implementation, use and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Ten years of using knowledge balance sheets in Austrian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 34-52, (2018); Jongbloed B., Enders J., Salerno C., Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda, Higher Education, 56, 3, pp. 303-324, (2008); Leitner K.H., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Stowasser R., Wagner K., Data envelopment analysis as method for evaluating intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6, 4, pp. 528-543, (2005); Leitner K.H., Curaj A., Elena-Perez S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.A., Zaksa K., A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in european universities, guidelines for implementation, (2014); Lombardi R., Dumay J., Guest editorial: exploring corporate disclosure and reporting of intellectual capital (IC): emerging innovations, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 2-8, (2017); Lombardi R., Lardo A., Cuozzo B., Trequattrini R., Emerging trends in entrepreneurial universities within mediterranean regions: an international comparison, EuroMed Journal of Business, 12, 2, pp. 130-145, (2017); Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J., Nappo F., Entrepreneurial universities and strategy. The case of the university of Bari, Management Decision, 57, 12, pp. 3387-3405, (2019); McNay I., From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: the changing cultures of universities, The Changing University, 9, pp. 105-115, (1995); Mariani G., Carlesi A., Scarfo A.A., Academic spin-off as value driver of the intellectual capital. The case of university of Pisa spin-offs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 202-226, (2018); Markman G.D., Siegel D.S., Wright M., Research and technology commercialisation, Journal of Management Studies, 45, 8, pp. 1401-1423, (2008); Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., Human capital loss in an academic performance measurement system, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 53-70, (2018); Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., Parker L., The neoliberal reality of higher education in Australia: how accountingisation is corporatising knowledge, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 6, pp. 1261-1282, (2021); Massaro M., Dumay J., Guthrie J., On the shoulders of the giants: undertaking a structured literature review, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29, 5, pp. 767-801, (2016); Miller K., McAdam M., McAdam R., The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective, R&D Management, 44, 3, pp. 265-287, (2014); Ndou V., Secundo G., Dumay J., Gjevori E., Understanding intellectual capital disclosure in online media big data: an exploratory case study in a university, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 499-530, (2018); Nielsen C., Roslender R., Schaper S., Explaining the demise of the intellectual capital statement in Denmark, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 1, pp. 38-64, (2017); Paloma Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Parker L., University corporatisation: driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Parker L., Martin-Sardesai A., Guthrie J., The commercialised Australian public university: an accountingised transition, Financial Accountability and Management, 39, 1, pp. 125-150, (2021); Passaro R., Quinto I., Thomas A., The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 135-156, (2018); Pedro E., Leitao J., Alves H., The intellectual capital of higher education institutions, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 3, pp. 355-381, (2019); Petty R., Guthrie J., Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 2, pp. 155-176, (2000); Piber M., Pietsch G., Performance management in universities: the case of knowledge balance sheets analysed from a new institutionalist perspective, Performance Management and Management Control: Improving Organisations and Society, Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 16, pp. 379-401, (2006); Piber M., Habersam M., Skoog M., Ten years of using knowledge balance sheets in Austrian public universities – retrospective and perspective, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 34-52, (2018); Pike S., Roos G., The validity of measurement frameworks: measurement theory, Business Performance Measurement, pp. 218-236, (2007); Predazzi E., The third mission of the university, Rendiconti Lincei, 23, 1, pp. 17-22, (2012); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 5, pp. 701-732, (2019); Redford D.T., Fayolle A., Stakeholder management and the entrepreneurial university, Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University, (2014); Rippa P., Secundo G., Digital academic entrepreneurship: the potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, pp. 900-911, (2019); Ross E.W., Gibson R.J., Neoliberalism and Education Reform, (2007); Sanchez M., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Schiavone F., Romano M., Intellectual capital, science parks and incubators: an introduction to the special issue, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, (2014); Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Dumay J., Passiante G., Intellectual capital in the age of big data: establishing a research agenda, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 242-261, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Zilvinas Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: a critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Secundo G., Perez S.E., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital framework to measure universities’ third mission activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp. 229-239, (2017); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Siegel D.S., Wright M., Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink?, British Journal of Management, 26, 4, pp. 582-595, (2015); Sveiby K.E., Methods for measuring intangible assets, (2010); Sveiby K.E., (1988); Vagnoni E., Oppi C., Investigating factors of intellectual capital to enhance achievement of strategic goals in a university hospital setting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 331-363, (2015); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring the intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Villasalero M., University knowledge, open innovation and technological capital in Spanish science parks: research revealing or technology selling?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 4, pp. 479-496, (2014); Wagner M., Schaltegger S., Hansen E.G., Fichter K., University-linked programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and regional development: how and with what impact?, Small Business Economics, 56, 3, pp. 1-18, (2019); Wright M., Birley S., Mosey S., Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 3-4, pp. 235-246, (2004); De Santis F., Presti C., The relationship between intellectual capital and big data: a review, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 361-380, (2018); Guthrie J., Dumay J., Wicked problems involve social justice, social change, climate change and the social economy, Journal of Behavioural Economics and Social Systems, 3, 1, (2021); Lambert R., Lambert Review of Business-Industry Collaboration, (2003); Sardesai A.V., Guthrie J., Outcomes-based metrics and research measurement in Australian higher education, Public Sector Reform and Performance Management in Developed Economies: Outcomes-Based Approaches in Practice, pp. 34-48, (2021)","G. Secundo; Department of Management, Finance and Technology, University LUM Giuseppe Degennaro, Bari, Italy; email: secundo@lum.it","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","2049372X","","","","English","Meditari Account. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85152891984"
"Chatterji N.; Kiran R.","Chatterji, Niti (57194852542); Kiran, Ravi (22985431500)","57194852542; 22985431500","The influence of human, organizational and relational capital of universities on their performance: a developing economy perspective","2023","Journal of Intellectual Capital","24","3","","799","829","30","2","10.1108/JIC-03-2021-0087","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85131576535&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-03-2021-0087&partnerID=40&md5=57baf75906446985fc24bcf955ffeee3","Amity Business School, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India","Chatterji N., Amity Business School, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India; Kiran R., School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India","Purpose: One in every four graduates of the world will be the product of Indian higher education system by the year 2030 as per a report issued by the FICCI (Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry) in 2015. This brings out the growing significance of higher education sector and purpose of the study. The present study tries to explore the relationship between intellectual capital of universities and their performance. Design/methodology/approach: Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied on the dataset of 590 respondents, and the suggested model reiterate that human capital, organizational capital and relational capital have a significant influence on a university's performance. Findings: Human capital, organizational capital and relational capital have a significant influence on a university's performance. The study strongly recommends that factors like research facilitation, quality of work life, knowledge sharing, industry academia relationship and information disclosure have a strong influence on performance. Originality/value: Not just India, but policymakers across Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) can strategize around intellectual capital to give a push to the fast-growing higher education sector. © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Human capital; Intellectual capital; Organizational capital; Relational capital; University performance","","","","","","","","Abualoush S., Masa'deh R., Bataineh K., Alrowwad A., The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organizational performance, Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 13, pp. 279-309, (2018); Ahmadi F., Parivizi B., Meyhami B., Ziaee M., Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4, 1, (2012); Akhavan P., Khosravian F., VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46, 3, pp. 338-352, (2016); Alleman N.F., Haviland D., Higher Education, 74, pp. 527-542, (2017); Amano M., Women in higher education, Higher Education, 34, 2, pp. 215-235, (1997); Aversano N., Nicolo G., Sannino G., Tartaglia P.P., The Integrated Plan in Italian public universities: new patterns in intellectual capital disclosure, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 4, pp. 655-679, (2020); Bamel N., Bamel U.K., Sahay V., Thite M., Usage, benefits and barriers of human resource information system in universities, VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 44, 4, pp. 519-536, (2014); Belwal R., Priyadarshi P., Fazari M.H.A., Graduate attributes and employability skills: graduates' perspectives on employers' expectations in Oman, International Journal of Educational Management, 31, 6, pp. 814-827, (2017); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Rossi F.M., Polcini P.T., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Bongiovanni I., Renaud K., Cairns G., Securing intellectual capital: an exploratory study in Australian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 3, pp. 481-505, (2020); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops, measures and models, Management Decisions, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Boutchich D.E.K., Human capital in public research laboratories: a method proposal for assessing actual and target scores, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12, 5, pp. 1189-1208, (2020); Chatterji N., Kiran R., Intellectual capital and intellectual imperatives of higher education sector: an emerging economy perspective, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 45-68, (2021); Chattopadhyay S., Choudhury P., Sink or swim: the role of workplace context in shaping career advancement and human-capital development, Organization Science, 28, 2, pp. 1-17, (2017); Chen M.Y.-C., Lam L.W., Zhu J.N.Y., Should companies invest in human resource development practices? The role of intellectual capital and organizational performance, Personnel Review, 50, 2, pp. 460-477, (2021); Corcoles Y.R., Penalver J.F.S., Ponce A.T., Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders' information needs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 356-376, (2011); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cullen J., Joyce J., Hassall T., Broadbent M., Quality in higher education: from monitoring to management, Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 1, pp. 5-14, (2003); Dobele A.R., Rundle- Thiele S., Kopanidis F., The cracked glass ceiling: equal work but unequal status, Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 3, pp. 456-468, (2014); Elena-Perez S., Saritas O., Pook K., Warden C., Foresight, 13, 2, pp. 31-48, (2011); Farid D., Nejati M., Mirfakhredini H., Balanced scorecard application in universities and higher education institutes: implementation guide in an Iranian context, Annals of University of Bucharest, Economic and Administrative Series, 2, pp. 31-45, (2008); Felicio J.A., Couto E., Caiado J., Human capital, social capital and organizational performance: a structural modeling approach, Management Decision, 52, 2, pp. 350-364, (2014); Ferrer J.L., Morris L., Engaging elitism: the mediating effect of work engagement on affective commitment and quit intentions in two Australian university groups, Higher Education Quarterly, 67, 4, pp. 340-357, (2013); Finney T.G., Finney R.Z., Are students their universities' customers? An exploratory study, Education+ Training, 52, 4, pp. 276-291, (2010); Frondizi R., Fantauzzi C., Colasanti N., Fiorani G., The evaluation of universities' third mission and intellectual capital: theoretical analysis and application to Italy, Sustainability, 11, 12, (2019); Gallego-Alvarez I., Rodriguez-Dominguez L., Garcia-Sanchez I.-M., Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors, Online Information Review, 35, 3, pp. 360-385, (2011); Hermanowicz J.C., Universities, academic careers and the valorization of shiny things, The University under Pressure, 46, pp. 303-328, (2016); Herrington C.D., Summers K.P., Global pressures on education research: quality, utility and infrastructure, Asia Pacific Education Review, 15, 3, pp. 339-346, (2014); Huang F., Building the world-class research universities: a case study of China, Higher Education, 70, 2, pp. 203-215, (2015); Iacoviello G., Bruno E., Cappiello A., A theoretical framework for managing intellectual capital in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 33, 5, pp. 919-938, (2019); Karathanos D., Karathanos P., Applying the balanced scorecard to education, Journal of Education for Business, 80, 4, pp. 222-230, (2005); Kezar A., Research in Higher Education, 46, pp. 831-860, (2005); Kim Y.K., Lundberg C.A., A structural model of the relationship between student-faculty interaction and cognitive skills development among college students, Research in Higher Education, 57, 3, pp. 288-309, (2016); Koc N., Celik B., The impact of number of students per teacher on student achievement, Proceedings of the Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education, pp. 65-70, (2015); Kushwaha P., Rao M.K., Integrative Role of KM Infrastructure and KM Strategy to Enhance Individual Competence: Conceptualizing Knowledge Process Enablement, (2015); Lee S.-H., Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7, (2010); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Maltseva A., Veselov I., Lelchitskiy I., Gridchina A., Maimina E., The role of university’s intellectual capital in creation of scientific activity’s results, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15, 3, pp. 204-218, (2018); Masron T.A., Ahmad Z., Baba Rahim N., Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, (2012); McDearmon J.T., Hail to thee, our alma mater: alumni role identity and the relationship to institutional support behaviors, Research in Higher Education, 54, 3, pp. 283-302, (2013); Nazari-Shirkoui S., Mousakhani S., Tavakoli M., Dalvand M.R., Saparauskas J., Antucheviciene J., Importance-performance analysis based balanced scorecard for performance evaluation in higher education institutions: an integrated fuzzy approach, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21, 3, pp. 647-678, (2020); Nguyen T.H., Building human resources management capacity for university research: the case at four leading Vietnamese universities, Higher Education, 71, 2, pp. 231-251, (2016); Noaman A.Y., Ragab A.H.M., Madbouly A.I., Khedra A.M., Fayoumi A.G., Higher education quality assessment model: towards achieving educational quality standard, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1, pp. 1-24, (2015); Paoloni P., Cesaroni F.M., Demartini P., Relational capital and knowledge transfer in universities, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 1, pp. 185-201, (2018); Paoloni P., Modaffari G., Mattei G., Knowledge resources in the university context: an overview of literature, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 4, pp. 703-724, (2020); Pick D., Teo S., Yeung M., Friend or Foe? New managerialism and technical, administrative and clerical support staff in Australian Universities, Higher Education Quarterly, 66, 1, pp. 3-23, (2012); Postiglione G.A., Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong’s research universities: network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 3, pp. 345-366, (2013); Postiglione G.A., Arimoto A., Higher Education, 70, pp. 151-153, (2015); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Manzaneque-Lizano M., Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13, pp. 31-44, (2015); Ramirez-Corcoles Y., Tejada A., Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20, 5, pp. 701-732, (2019); Salinas-Avila J., Abreu-Ledon R., Tamauo- Arias J., Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21, 6, pp. 1053-1084, (2020); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities, Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sayed N., Ratify, reject or revise: balanced scorecard and universities, International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 3, pp. 203-220, (2013); Secundo G., De Beer C., Schutte C.S.L., Passiante G., Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities' competitiveness: the technology transfer offices' role, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 607-624, (2017); Shin J.C., Lee S.J., Evolution of research universities as a national research system in Korea: accomplishments and challenges, Higher Education, 70, 2, pp. 187-202, (2015); Stephenson A.L., Heckert A., Yerger D.B., College choice and the university brand: exploring the consumer decision framework, Higher Education, 71, 4, pp. 489-503, (2016); Tomas- Miquel J.-V., Exposito- Langa M., Nicolau- Julia D., The influence of relationship networks on academic performance in higher education: a comparative study between students of a creative and a non-creative discipline, Higher Education, 71, 3, pp. 307-322, (2016); Townsend T., Pisapia J., Razzaq J., Fostering interdisciplinary research in universities: a case study of leadership, alignment and support, Studies in Higher Education, 40, 4, pp. 658-675, (2015); Umashankar V., Dutta K., Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: an Indian perspective, International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 1, pp. 54-67, (2007); Utulu S.C., Okoye M.A., Application of social capital theory to Nigerian university web sites, The Electronic Library, 28, 1, pp. 171-183, (2008); Valenti A., Horner S.V., Leveraging board talent for innovation strategy, Journal of Business Strategy, 41, 1, pp. 11-18, (2020); Weerts D.J., Cabrera A.F., Sanford T., Beyond giving: political advocacy and volunteer behaviors of public university alumni, Research in Higher Education, 51, 4, pp. 346-365, (2010); Zhang L., Bao W., Sun L., Resources and research production in higher education: a longitudinal analysis of Chinese universities, 2000-2010, Research in Higher Education, 57, 7, pp. 869-891, (2016)","N. Chatterji; Amity Business School, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India; email: nchatterji@ggn.amity.edu","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85131576535"
"Yonezawa A.; Sato K.; Kawano G.","Yonezawa, Akiyoshi (7006444605); Sato, Kaoru (56319080300); Kawano, Ginko (56318811500)","7006444605; 56319080300; 56318811500","Cities and the lives of university academics","2014","Asia Pacific Viewpoint","55","2","","144","155","11","1","10.1111/apv.12054","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905826314&doi=10.1111%2fapv.12054&partnerID=40&md5=80399dde758bba743da42ff0804eef6b","Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan; Institute for Social Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, 7-3-1 Hongo, Japan; Faculty of Education, Arts and Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, 990-9860, 1-4-12 Koshirakawacho, Japan","Yonezawa A., Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan; Sato K., Institute for Social Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, 7-3-1 Hongo, Japan; Kawano G., Faculty of Education, Arts and Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, 990-9860, 1-4-12 Koshirakawacho, Japan","Although the relationship between cities and universities is a commonly discussed topic, the so-called 'world class universities' and 'global cities' in East Asia do not always fit into one single cosmopolitan model. Focusing on the case of Tokyo and Japan, the authors of this paper examine the mobility patterns, academic and social lives, and gender differences of university academics as representative knowledge workers. Using original survey results, the authors first create a hierarchical structure of academic mobility patterns in Japan, and then argue that Tokyo, as the capital of Japan, is a centre of the intellectual network through its education and training function. © 2014 Victoria University of Wellington and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.","East Asia; Global city; Japan; Tokyo; University academics","Honshu; Japan; Kanto; Tokyo [Kanto]; academic performance; higher education; numerical model; university sector; world city","","","","","","","Altbach P.G., Balan J., World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America, (2007); Bagchi-Sen S., Smith H.L., The role of the university as an agent of regional economic development, Geography Compass, 6, 7, pp. 439-453, (2012); Florida R.L., Cities and the creative class, (2005); Friedman T.L., The world is flat: A brief history of the globalized world in the twenty-first century, (2005); Fujimura S., Ryudoka suru daigaku kyoin shijo (increasing mobility of academic labor market), Nihon no daigaku kyoin shijo saiko (a study of academic marketplace in Japan), pp. 49-95, (2005); Horta H., Sato M., Yonezawa A., Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective, Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 1, pp. 35-44, (2011); Kim T., Locke W., Transnational academic mobility and the academic profession, CHERI, higher education and society: A research report, pp. 25-34, (2010); International education hubs: Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models, (2014); Koike K., Internal labor markets: Workers in large firms, (1983); Kojunsha, Zenkoku daigaku shokuinroku (national directory of university staff), (2005); Kuwahara S., (2010); Lee J.J., Kim D., Brain gain or brain circulation? U.S. doctoral recipients returning to South Korea, Higher Education, 59, 5, pp. 627-643, (2010); Mok K., Yu K., The quest for regional education hub status and transnational higher education: Challenges for managing human capital in Asia, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31, 3, pp. 229-248, (2011); Cross-border partnerships in higher education: Strategies and issues, (2012); Salmi J., The challenge of establishing world-class universities, (2008); Sassen S., The global city: New York, London, Tokyo, (1991); Sassen S., Sociology of globalization, (2007); Sassen S., Cities in today's global age, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29, 1, pp. 3-34, (2009); Saxenian A., From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40, 2, pp. 35-61, (2005); Shimbori M., The Japanese academic profession, Higher Education, 10, 1, pp. 75-87, (1981); Constructing knowledge societies: New challenges for tertiary education, (2002); Yonezawa A., The development of private higher education in Japan since the 1960s: A re-examination of a center-periphery paradigm, The forefront of international higher education: A festschrift in honor of Philip. G. Altbach, pp. 183-194, (2014)","","","Blackwell Publishing Ltd","","","","","","13607456","","","","English","Asia Pac. Viewp.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84905826314"
"Radianto W.E.D.; Gumanti T.A.","Radianto, Wirawan ED (57212461625); Gumanti, Tatang Ary (56974418900)","57212461625; 56974418900","Human capital analysis of organizational performance mediated by customer capital: Case of accounting study program","2019","International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research","8","12","","294","297","3","0","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076784140&partnerID=40&md5=878eb6190033b6cd415cf482ff664d5f","","","Universities in Indonesia have now become industries, thus causing competition between universities to be unavoidable. The key to success for every university in Indonesia to win this competition is to gain competitive advantage. One important factor determining competitive advantage is intellectual capital. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of human capital in performance through customer capital as a mediating variable. The research sample is an accounting study program in Surabaya. Data were analyzed using PLS. Human capital is found to affect customer capital and customer capital affects performance, but human capital does not directly affect performance. © IJSTR 2019.","Accounting study program; Customer capital; Higher education; Human capital; Intellectual capital; Performance; Structural capital","","","","","","","","Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: A critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Winston G.C., Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 1, pp. 13-36, (1999); Weinstein L., Paul R., Williams S., Use of Baldrige assessment techniques in strategic planning and assessments for arts administration in higher education, International Journal of Arts Management, 9, 3, pp. 34-49, (2007); Winston G.C., Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 1, pp. 13-36, (1999); Noe R.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Gerhart B., Wright P.M., Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, (2017); Chahal H., Bakshi P., Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: Role of innovation and organizational learning, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33, 3, pp. 376-399, (2015); Yaseen S.G., Dajani D., Hasan Y., The impact of intellectual capital on the competitive advantage: Applied study in Jordanian telecommunication companies, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, C, pp. 168-175, (2016); Alkhateeb A.N., Yao L., Kie C.J., Shaban O.K.A., Review on Intellectual Capital and Its Components towards Competitive Advantage in Universities, Proceedings of the National Conference for Postgraduate Research (NCON-PGR 2016), pp. 763-774, (2016); Ballow J., Burgman R., Roos G., Molnar M., A New Paradigm for Managing Shareholder Value, (2004); Petty R., Cuganesan S., Finch N., Ford G., Intellectual Capital and Valuation: Challenges in the Voluntary Disclosure of Value Drivers, (2009); Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Davenport T.H., Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, (2004); Khalique M., Bontis N., Shaari J.A.N.B., Yaacob M.R., Ngah R., Intellectual capital and organisational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 20-36, (2018); Mehralian G., Nazari J.A., Ghasemzadeh P., The effects of knowledge creation process on organizational performance using the BSC approach: The mediating role of intellectual capital, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 4, pp. 802-823, (2018); Wernerfelt B., A resource‐based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 2, pp. 171-180, (1984); Collins D.J., Montgomery C.A., Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach, (2005); Bontis N., Chua Chong Keow W., Richardson S., Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, pp. 85-100, (2000); Marr B., Stratovic D., Understanding Corporate Value: Managing and Reporting Intellectual Capital, (2004); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Astuti P.D., Hubungan Intellectual Capital Dan Business Performance. Doctoral Dissertation, (2004); Astuti D.P., Sabeni A., Hubungan Intellectual Capital dan Business Performance dengan Diamond Specification: Sebuah Perspektif Akuntansi, Accounting National Symposium (SNA VIII), (2005); Fisher J.G., Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: Past results and future directions, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10, (1998); Porter M.E., How competitive forces shape strategy, Readings in Strategic Management, pp. 133-143, (1989); Whittington R., Johnson G., Scholes K., Exploring Corporate Strategy, (2005); Margaretha F., Rakhman A., Analisis pengaruh intellectual capital terhadap market value dan financial performance perusahaan dengan metode value added intellectual coefficient, Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8, 2, pp. 199-217, (2006)","","","International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research","","","","","","22778616","","","","English","Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85076784140"
"Iacoviello G.; Bruno E.; Cappiello A.","Iacoviello, Giuseppina (56040784700); Bruno, Elena (56684558000); Cappiello, Antonella (57201693498)","56040784700; 56684558000; 57201693498","A theoretical framework for managing intellectual capital in higher education","2019","International Journal of Educational Management","33","5","","919","938","19","9","10.1108/IJEM-02-2018-0080","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067630792&doi=10.1108%2fIJEM-02-2018-0080&partnerID=40&md5=c0ac2f2d449c6dc1ffec286d5c2e1802","Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy","Iacoviello G., Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Bruno E., Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Cappiello A., Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify, through the preparation of a theoretical framework, the drivers able to highlight the relationships between universities and stakeholders in the area of higher education. It also intends to stress the importance of intellectual capital (IC) regarding its contribution to create the quality of higher education. Design/methodology/approach: The method, through the repetition of different “rounds” of interviews with questionnaires, tends therefore to create situations of comparison, verification and discussion of the different hypotheses prefigured, and then come to a convergence of both scenarios and dates of realization. Findings: The paper provides a system of indicators for assessing the quality of relationships between stakeholders in the key processes of the universities. Research limitations/implications: The paper provides a pilot model that needs further adjustments in itinere, based on rigorous empirical tests conducted to confer on it the characteristics of universal applicability within the university context. Practical implications: The major contribution of the model is evident from the resulting interpretative process, which makes it possible to deduce, from the performance indicators, the strategies put in place by the university to achieve their goals, that is, to prepare any interventions for the optimization of the management of IC which can create the quality of higher education institution. Originality/value: None of the models presented in the literature details the quality of the relationship between stakeholders in the key processes of the universities and therefore neither investigates the impact produced by them on the performance of the university nor on the way stakeholders perceive the usefulness of the knowledge transmitted or the level of customer satisfaction achieved, as indeed the most recent research on the subject envisages. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Higher education; Intellectual capital; Management; Performance indicators; Value drivers","","","","","","","","Anskaitis A., Bareisis V., Understanding the impact of intellectual capital on the performance of organizations through constructivist and analytical approach, (2005); Bilancio sociale. Documenti di ricerca n. 7. La rendicondazione sociale nelle università, (2008); Intellectual Capital Report 1999, (2000); Barney J.B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Mangement, 17, 1, pp. 99-120, (1991); Beattie V., Thompson S., A comprehensive analysis of intellectual capital components as a precursor to empirical investigation of disclosures in annual reports, (2004); Bercovitz J., Feldman M., Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 1, pp. 175-188, (2006); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bodnar V., Harangozo T., Tirnitz T., Revesz E., Kovats G., Managing Intellectual Capital in Hungarian Universities – the case of Corvinus University of Budapest, (2009); Bonaccorsi A., Daraio C., Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe, (2007); Bose S., Thomas K., Applying the balanced scorecard for better performance of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 653-665, (2007); Bozbura F.T., Beskese A., Kaharaman C., Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, Expert systems with applications, 32, 4, pp. 1100-1112, (2007); Bratianu C., The intellectual capital of universities. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Series, 18, 1, pp. 63-70, (2009); Bueno Campos E., Paz Salmador M., Merino C., Towards a model of intellectual capital in public administrations, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3, 3, pp. 214-232, (2006); Canibano L., Sanchez M.P., Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting, Journal of Human Resources Costing and Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 93-104, (2009); Chiucchi M.S., Sistemi di misurazione e di reporting del capitale intellettuale: criticità e prospettive, (2004); Chu S.K.W., Chan K.H., Yu K.Y., Ng H.T., Wong W.K., An empirical study of the impact of intellectual capital on business performance, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 10, 1, pp. 11-21, (2011); Clark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways to Transformation, (1998); A Guideline for Intellectual Capital Statements – A Key to Knowledge Management, (2000); Intellectual Capital Statements: The New Guidelines, (2003); De Nito E., Reina R., L’approccio social-construction al knowledge management: dalla gestione alla creazione della conoscenza, Knowledge Management e successo aziendale: Proceedings of the 26th AIDEA Conference, (2003); Di Berardino D., La valutazione e la disclosure delle risorse intangibili delle università, (2013); Dumay J., Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 1, pp. 4-15, (2012); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Durst S., Guldenberg G., The intellectual capital statement as a marketing communication tool: an exploratory study, Intellectual Capital in a Complex Business Landscape, Proceedings of the V International Forum on Knowledge Assets, (2010); Eccles R., Krzus M., One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, (2010); Edvdinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: Realising your Compnay’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, (1997); Etzkowitz H., The evolution of the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 1, pp. 64-77, (2004); Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Cantisano Terra B.R., The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution from ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 313-330, (2000); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a university, (2005); Ferraris Franceschi R., Il percorso scientifico in economia aziendale, (2010); Frey M., Il bilancio sociale delle Università, Impresa progetto Electronic Journal of Management, 1, pp. 1-14, (2009); Gibb A., Hannon P., Towards the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 1, pp. 73-110, (2006); Guthrie J., Riccieri F., Dumay J., Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, The British Accounting Review, 44, 2, pp. 68-92, (2012); Guthrie J., Dumay J., Ricceri F., Nielsen C., The Routledge Companion to Intellectual Capital, (2017); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian Universities: the implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspective on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Jones N., Measuring intellectual capital in higher education, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 8, 2, pp. 113-136, (2009); Kirby D.A., Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5, pp. 599-603, (2006); Lazzeroni M., Piccaluga A., Towards the entrepreneurial university, Local Economy, 18, 1, pp. 38-48, (2003); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Managing and reporting intangible assets in research technology organisations, R&D Management, 35, 2, pp. 125-136, (2005); Leitner K.H., Warden C., Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 33-51, (2004); Leitner K.H., Elena S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Marinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.A., Zaksa K., A Strategic Approach for Intellectual Capital Management in European Universities, (2014); Lordache-Platis M., Importance of the relational capital in universities; the students’ and professors’ approaches, (2015); Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles, (2002); Mouritsen J., Larsen H.T., Bukh P.N., Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6, 7, pp. 735-762, (2001); Ndou V., Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Entrepreneurial universities in regional innovation ecosystems: a discontinuity in the process of human capital creation, (2013); Methodological guide, Final report of the observatory of the European University, (2006); Piber M., Habersam M., Skoog M., Ten years of using knowledge balance sheets in Austrian public universities – a retrospective and prospective view, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 34-52, (2018); Pike S., Boldt-Christmas L., Roos G., Intellectual capital: origin and evolution, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3, 3, pp. 233-248, (2006); Poincare G.H., Scienza e metodo, (1997); Pop N.A., Tantau A., Pelau C., Bena I., Human capital and relational capital dynamics within a University, ECIC 2011 Proceeding of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 343-349, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J.A., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C., Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, (1997); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sanchez-Torres M.J., Rivera Torres S.C., A model for measuring research capacity using an intellectual capital-based approach in a Colombian higher education institution, Innovar, Especial en Education, 19, 1, pp. 179-197, (2009); Bilancio sociale 2016, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Magarielli D., Esposito E., Passiante G., Supporting decision making-making in service supplier selection using a hybrid fuzzy extended AHP approach: a case study, Business Process Management Journal, 13, 1, pp. 196-222, (2017); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., The strategic impact of measuring and reporting intangible assets in entrepreneurial universities, (2010); Secundo G., Perez E.S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.L., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: a dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-445, (2015); Stancu S., Vacaroiu I.A., Naghi L.E., Stancu A.M., Constantin A.M., The importance of intellectual capital in the development of inter university competitiveness in Romania, Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning – ICICKM 2014 Sydney, (2014); Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisations, (1997); Sveiby K.E., Methods for measuring intangible assets, (2010); Tai W., Chen C., A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable, Expert Systems with Application, 36, 2, pp. 3483-3488, (2009); Teece D.L., Pisano G., Shuen A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, pp. 509-533, (1997); Bilancio Sociale 2005, (2006); Bilancio Sociale 2006, (2007); Bilancio sociale 2011, (2012); Bilancio Sociale anno 2006, (2007); Bilancio sociale 2013, (2014); Il bilancio sociale dell’Università di Pisa 2012, (2013); Quarto bilancio sociale 2015, (2016); Primo Bilancio Sociale 2006, (2007); Bilancio sociale. Appendice II: il capitale intellettuale, (2008); Veltri S., Sistemi di misurazione del capitale intellettuale d’azienda, (2007); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser M., Measuring the intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Wu H., Chen J., Chen I., Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese universities: a hybrid fuzzy application, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2, pp. 1635-1642, (2010); Zambon S., Monciardini D., Intellectual capital and innovation: a guideline for future research, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2, 17, pp. 13-26, (2015); Altenburger O.A., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., The order on the intellectual capital statements of Austrian universities – a critical analysis, Proceedings of the IFSAM: International Federation of Scholarly Associations of Management, 8th World Congress, (2006); Altenburger O.A., Novotny-Farkas Z., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M.M., Intellectual capital reports for universities – a trial intellectual capital report at the University of Vienna, (2005); Bueno E., Arrien M., Rodriguez O., Model for the measurement and management of intellectual capital: intellectus model, Intellectus Documents, 5, 2, pp. 181-192, (2003); Bilancio Sociale anno 2006, (2007); University Organisation Amendment Act and Universities of the Arts Organisation Amendment Act, (2002)","G. Iacoviello; Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; email: giuseppina.iacoviello@unipi.it","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","0951354X","","","","English","Int. J. Educ. Manage.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85067630792"
"Altinay A.T.","Altinay, Aysenur Tarakcioglu (57865415300)","57865415300","GLOBAL RESEARCH TRENDS OF INTEGRATED REPORTING WITH NETWORK MAP TECHNIQUE ANALYSIS","2022","Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies","5","13-119","","117","125","8","1","10.15587/1729-4061.2022.265763","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141788520&doi=10.15587%2f1729-4061.2022.265763&partnerID=40&md5=4375bb453fdc60371d429c07a4bc5ce7","Department of Civil Aviation, Usak University, Campus of Bir Eylul, Usak, 64200, Turkey","Altinay A.T., Department of Civil Aviation, Usak University, Campus of Bir Eylul, Usak, 64200, Turkey","In this study, a systematic analysis of the global trends of the studies carried out between 1988‒2021 on integrated reporting, which is a non-financial reporting tool that focuses on the process evolving from the shareholder approach to the stakeholder approach and the concept of value creation, which is jointly focused on corporate governance and reporting and visualization is performed. It is thought that bibliometric analysis of academic studies in the field of integrated reporting will make important contributions in terms of revealing which concepts are discussed in the literature and which relationship dimension. For this purpose, the data obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection Database were analyzed with the VOSviewer software. In the database, 462 studies were reached in the date range determined by the keyword “integrated reporting” in the title category. A systematic bibliometric analysis was conducted that included different variables such as citation counts, leading authors, organizations, keywords, and countries where the articles were written. According to the findings from the analysis, the three most influential journals for integrated reporting research are Meditari Accountancy Research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, and Sustainability. The vast majority of studies were published in the English language. The three most published authors are Raimo Nicola, Vitolla Filippo and Dumay John. The most influential institutions are Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Lum Jean Monnet University and Macquarie University. The findings will help researchers in the field understand the overall trend, relevance and performance of variables in globally integrated reporting research, and will provide guidelines for further research © 2022, Authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons CC BY license","Bibliometrics analysis; Integrated reporting; Network visualization; Vosviewer; Web of science","","","","","","","","Adams C. A., The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to action, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp. 23-28, (2015); Brown J., Dillard J., Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 7, pp. 1120-1156, (2014); van Eck N. J., Waltman L., Citation-based clustering of publications using CihNehExplorer and VOSviewer, Ccienhomehrics, 111, 2, pp. 1053-1070, (2017); Wang Q., Distribution features and intellectual structures of digital humanities, Journal of Documentation, 74, 1, pp. 223-246, (2018); Bhattacharya S., Basu P. K., Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis, Ccienhomehrics, 43, 3, pp. 359-372, (1998); Cerbone D., Maroun W., Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an inshihuhiontl logics framework, The British Accounting Review, 52, 3, (2020); Cmbotariu M.-S., Socoliuc M., Grosu V., Mihaila S., Cosmulese C. G. C., Modeling the relationship between integrated reporting quality and sustainable business development, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22, 6, pp. 1476-1491, (2021); Ozkose H., Gencer C., Bibliometric analysis and mapping of management information systems field, Gazi University Journal of Science, 30, 4, pp. 356-371, (2017); Jose de Oliveira O., Francisco da Silva F., Juliani F., Cesar Ferreira Motta Barbosa L., Vieira Nunhes T., Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects, Scientometrics Recent Advances, (2019); Dumay J., Bernardi C., Guthrie J., Demartini P, Integrated reporting: A structured literature review, Accounting Forum, 40, 3, pp. 166-185, (2016); Maier D., Maier A., Aschilean I., Anastasiu L., Gavris O., The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature, Sustainability, 12, 10, (2020); de Villiers C., Sharma U., A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 70, (2020); Moral-Munoz J. A., Herrera-Viedma E., Santisteban-Espejo A., Cobo M. J., Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review, El Profesional de La Informaci n, 29, 1, (2020); Doleck T., Lajoie S., Social networking and academic performance: A review, Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1, pp. 435-465, (2017); Shanti S., Tjahjadi B., Narsa I. M., Integrated Reporting’s Impact on Corporate Governance: Study in Asean Capital Market, Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan, 9, 1, (2020); Flower J., The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp. 1-17, (2015); Garcia-Sanchez I.-M., Rodriguez-Ariza L., Frias-Aceituno J.-V., The cultural system and integrated reporting, International Business Review, 22, 5, pp. 828-838, (2013); Mohammad N., Integrated Reporting Practice and Disclosure in Bangladesh’s Banking Sectors, Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 3, 2, (2019); Katoch R., IoT research in supply chain management and logistics: A bibliometric analysis using vosviewer software, Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, pp. 2505-2515, (2022); Cash-Gibson L., Rojas-Gualdron D. F., Pericas J. M., Benach J., Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015), PLOS ONE, 13, 1, (2018); Iredele O. O., Examining the association between quality of integrated reports and corporate characteristics, Heliyon, 5, 7, (2019); Sengupta I. N., Bibliometrics, Iniornieiries. Scienioiiieirics and l.ibni.nielrics: An Overview, Lilm, 42, 2, (1992); Rahman M., Haque T. L., Fukui T., Research Articles Published in Clinical Radiology Journals: Trend of Contribution from Different Countries1, Academic Radiology, 12, 7, pp. 825-829, (2005); Mascarenhas C., Ferreira J. J., Marques C., University-industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda, Science and Public Policy, 45, 5, pp. 708-718, (2018); Marcucci G., Ciarapica F., Poler R., Sanchis R., A Bibliometric Analysis of the Emerging Trends in Silver Economy, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54, 1, pp. 936-941, (2021); Frias-Aceituno J. V., Rodr guez-Ariza L., Garc a-S nchez I. M., Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, pp. 45-55, (2013); Fang Y., Yin J., Wu B., Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26, 1, pp. 108-126, (2017); Obeng V. A., Ahmed K., Miglani S., Integrated reporting and earnings quality: The moderating effect of agency costs, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 60, (2020); Sokil O., Accounting and Analytical Support for Cost and Value Added Management: The Way to Sustainable Development, Accounting and Finance, 1, 87, pp. 59-68, (2020); Goyal N., A “review” of policy sciences: bibliometric analysis of authors, references, and topics during 1970-2017, Policy Sciences, 50, 4, pp. 527-537, (2017); Huang Y., Huang Q., Ali S., Zhai X., Bi X., Liu R., Rehabilitation using virtual reality technology: a bibliometric analysis, 1996-2015, Scientometrics, 109, 3, pp. 1547-1559, (2016); Zhou S., Simnett R., Green W., Does Integrated Reporting Matter to the Capital Market?, Abacus, 53, 1, pp. 94-132, (2017); Xie H., Zhang Y., Wu Z., Lv T., A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions, Land, 9, 1, (2020); van Nunen K., Li J., Reniers G., Ponnet K., Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research, Safety Science, 108, pp. 248-258, (2018); Jensen J. C., Berg N., Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach, Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 5, pp. 299-316, (2011); Michalopoulos A., Falagas M. E., A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Production in Respiratory Medicine, Chest, 128, 6, pp. 3993-3998, (2005); Yu D., Wang W., Zhang W., Zhang S., A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Current Science, 114, (2018); Zhong S., Geng Y., Liu W., Gao C., Chen W., A bibliometric review on natural resource accounting during 1995-2014, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, pp. 122-132, (2016); Kemeij A., Analysis of smart city global research trends with network map technique, Management Research & Practice, 14, 2, pp. 46-59, (2022); Stubbs W., Higgins C., Integrated Reporting and internal mechanisms of change, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 7, pp. 1068-1089, (2014)","A.T. Altinay; Department of Civil Aviation, Usak University, Campus of Bir Eylul, Usak, 64200, Turkey; email: aysenur.altinay@usak.edu.tr","","Technology Center","","","","","","17293774","","","","English","East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85141788520"
"Wiedenhofer R.; Friedl C.; Billy L.; Olejarova D.","Wiedenhofer, Roswitha (56590023200); Friedl, Christian (57194551937); Billy, Lubomir (57194547293); Olejarova, Daniela (6507776141)","56590023200; 57194551937; 57194547293; 6507776141","Application of IC-models in a combined public-private sector setting for regional innovation in Slovakia","2017","Journal of Intellectual Capital","18","3","","588","606","18","11","10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0110","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020751538&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-11-2016-0110&partnerID=40&md5=8e4f7e2f909bd8414172f53d60871abd","FH Joanneum – University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria; Centire s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia","Wiedenhofer R., FH Joanneum – University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria; Friedl C., FH Joanneum – University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria; Billy L., Centire s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia; Olejarova D., Centire s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to support the competitiveness and knowledge-based economic growth of the Slovak region of Košice and its stakeholders; suitable intellectual capital (IC) methodologies were selected and applied. This approach responds to a weak innovation performance of Slovakia in general and a weak connection of the Slovak labour market and vocational training system. Design/methodology/approach: The methodological “backbone” is given by IC reporting (ICR). The two ICR models – the Austrian University model and the German “Alwert” model – were selected and transferred to higher educational institutions (HEI) and companies in Košice. The knowledge transfer was accomplished by implementation of on-site trainings with different groups of stakeholders, supported by e-learning. Several accompanying in-depth interviews with Austrian stakeholders were conducted to derive recommendations for ICR implementation in the Slovak public sector. Findings: Beyond knowledge transfer, a shared understanding of the importance of IC management and common “IC language” between different stakeholders of the regional innovation system could be developed. Further, several recommendations for a sound development of an IC governance tool for HEI were elaborated. Practical implications: The knowledge transfer and practical implementation of this Slovak case were successful. Requests for follow-up initiatives, invitations for conferences, development of projects including ICR elements prove this valuation. Originality/value: A methodological innovation was accomplished by adapting a set of innovation key drivers as structural base for the development of the regional innovation function and interaction of stakeholders. © 2017, © FH Joanneum, University of Applied Sciences, Graz.","Higher education; Intellectual capital; Intellectual capital reporting; Public sector; Regional innovation policy; Smart specialisation strategy","","","","","","","","Arbeitskreis Wissensbilanz/Alwert K., Bornemann M., Will M., Wissensbilanz Made in Germany – Leitfaden 2.0 zur Erstellung einer Wissensbilanz, (2008); Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Wissenschaft und Forschung über die Wissensbilanz, (2006); Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Wissenschaft und Forschung über die Wissensbilanz, (2010); 97. Verordnung: Wissensbilanz-Verordnung sowie Änderung der Hochschulraumstrukturmittelverordnung, (2016); Biedermann H., Graggober M., Die Wissensbilanz als Strategie- und Steuerungsinstrument im Forschungsmanagement, Wissensbilanzen, Intellektuelles Kapital erfolgreich nutzen und entwickeln, pp. 187-202, (2005); Bornemann M., Puttinger B., NOEST (Netzwerk Ökoenergie Steiermark) Wissensbilanz 2004, (2004); Bornemann M., Denscher G., Zinka J., Mit kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozessen zu Lernenden Organisationen, Wissensbilanzen, Intellektuelles Kapital erfolgreich nutzen und entwickeln, pp. 175-185, (2005); Bornemann M., Reinhardt R., Handbuch Wissensbilanz – Umsetzung und Fallstudien, (2008); Bornemann M., Sammer M., Assessment methodology to prioritize knowledge management related activities to support organizational excellence, Measuring Business Excellence, 7, 2, pp. 21-28, (2003); Bornemann M., Sammer M., Projektbericht NANONET Styria 2003 – Pilotprojekt Wissensbilanz als Steuerungsinstrument für Forschungsnetzwerke, (2003); Innovationstreiber Intellektuelles Kapital – die Wissensbilanzmethode – Made in Germany, (2014); Dumay J., 15 Years of the journal of intellectual capital and counting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 2-37, (2014); Edvinsson L., Malone M.S., Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by finding it’s Hidden Roots, (1997); European innovation scoreboard 2004, comparative analysis of innovation performance, (2004); Intellectual Capital Statements – Made in Europe, (2008); The smart specialisation strategy for the slovak republic for period 2014-2020, (2015); Herrmann H.-J., 10 Jahre ‘Wissensbilanz – Made in Germany’ – Stand und Perspektiven, Wissensbilanzen im Mittelstand, pp. 1-15, (2013); Koch G., Bornemann M., Leitner K.-H., Measuring and reporting intangible assets and results in a european contract research organization, (2000); Koch G., Pircher R., Die erste gesamtuniversitäre Wissensbilanz: Donau-Universität Krems, Wissensbilanzen, Intellektuelles Kapital erfolgreich nutzen und entwickeln, pp. 279-304, (2005); Leitner K.H., Wissensbilanzierung: Ein neues Berichtswesen für Forschungsorganisationen und Hochschulen, (2003); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Leitner K.H., Sammer M., Graggober M., Schartinger D., Zielowski C., Wissensbilanzierung für Universitäten, (2001); Leitner K.-H., Curaj A., Elena-Perez S., Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M.-A., Zaksa K., A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in european universities. guidelines for implementation, (2014); Dlhodoby zamer vo vzdelavacej, vyskumnej, vyvojovej a dalsej tvorivej cinnosti pre oblast vysokych skol na roky 2016 – 2021 (long-term strategy in education, research, development and other creative activities of higher educational institutions for 2016-2021), (2016); Entwicklungsplan der Montanuniversität Leoben: Wertschöpfung für die Zukunft, (2012); Innovation-driven growth in regions: the role of smart specialisation, (2013); Regional competitiveness, (2015); Wissensbilanz: Bilanz des Wissens?, (2003); (2015); Sammer M., Management von wissensnetzwerken: herausforderungen für wissensintensive unternehmen, Wissensnetzwerke, pp. 431-449, (2003); The NetPromoter community, (2015); Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Intellectual capital reporting for austrian universities – a thrilling work in progress, (2004); Schwab K., Sala-I-Martin X., Brende B., The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-14, (2013); The state of European university-business cooporation, (2011); Vogt T., Lauer G., Scholz G., Michealis J., Vom Leitbild zur Strategie – Die Entwicklung des Strategiekonzepts der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Wissenschaftsmanagement, 2, pp. 32-38, (2002); Wiedenhofer R., Key drivers of technological innovation: intellectual capital view approach, International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems – Special Issue: Clusters, Systems of Innovation and Intangible for Fostering Growth: Finding the Keys for SMEs in Transitional and Developing Economies, 2, 3-4, pp. 283-301, (2012); The global competitiveness report 2013-14, (2013); Zajko M., International collaboration on innovation – its potential for Slovak SME, Education, Innovation and Society Development, pp. 52-61, (2014)","R. Wiedenhofer; FH Joanneum – University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria; email: roswitha.wiedenhofer@fh-joanneum.at","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Bronze Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85020751538"
"Garnett J.","Garnett, Jonathan (21933261000)","21933261000","Work-based learning: A critical challenge to the subject discipline structures and practices of higher education","2016","Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning","6","3","","305","314","9","31","10.1108/HESWBL-04-2016-0023","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979763141&doi=10.1108%2fHESWBL-04-2016-0023&partnerID=40&md5=83ffb562e54713787c91da54ff454e1e","Australian Institute of Business, Adelaide, Australia","Garnett J., Australian Institute of Business, Adelaide, Australia","Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show how transdisciplinarity is woven into the key curriculum components of individually negotiated work-based learning (WBL) programmes and to focus upon the performative value of knowledge in the work context. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws upon WBL academic literature and the authors 22 years operational experience of WBL. Findings: The paper suggests that while university-level WBL can enhance the performance of organizations and individuals it is also inherently challenging and challenged by the hegemony of subject disciplines and disciplinary-based university structures. WBL is concerned with knowledge which is often unsystematic, socially constructed and is action focused in order to achieve outcomes of significance to work. This contests the supremacy of the role of the university in curriculum design, delivery and validation of knowledge and means that work-based knowledge is often seen as transdisciplinary rather than conforming to traditional subject disciplines (Boud and Solomon, 2001). Research limitations/implications: Central to the distinctive nature of university WBL programmes is the role of the external organization as a partner with the university and the individual learner in the planning of learning activities which are intended to have significance for the workplace. For individual knowledge to become organizational knowledge, and thus fully contribute to the intellectual capital of the organization, it must be shared and accepted by others. It follows that a key concern for organizations must be the facilitation of the recognition of knowledge and this goes beyond using a transdisciplinary lens when guiding and assessing the work of individual higher education students. Practical implications: The paper has practical implications for the design and facilitation of WBL programmes at higher education level. Originality/value: Provides an informed and sustained examination of the concept of WBL and knowledge. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2042-3896.","Performative knowledge; Structural capital; Transdisciplinarity; Transdisciplinary knowledge; Work-based learning","","","","","","","","Armsby P., Costley C., Garnett J., The legitimisation of knowledge: A work based learning perspective of APEL, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25, 4, pp. 369-383, (2006); Barnett R., Realizing the University in an Age of Complexity, (2000); Boud D., Costley C., From project supervision to advising: New conceptions of the practice, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 2, pp. 119-130, (2007); Boud D., Solomon N., Work-based Learning: A New Higher Education, (2001); Bravenboer D., Maximising employer-responsive progression through organisational development, Learning from Experience in Employer Engagement, pp. 34-44, (2011); Brennan J., Little B., A Review of Work-based Learning in Higher Education, (1996); Choo C., The Knowing Organization, (1998); Costley C., Educational knowledge in professional practice: A transdisciplinary approach, Transdisciplinary Learning and Professional Practice, pp. 121-133, (2015); Cox E., Adult learners learning from experience: Using a reflective practice model to support work-based learning, Reflective Practice, 6, 4, pp. 459-472, (2005); De Graaff F., The interpretation of a knowledge claim in the recognition of prior learning (RPL) and the impact of this on RPL practice, Studies in Continuing Education, 36, 1, pp. 1-14, (2014); Durrant A., Rhodes G., Young D., University Level Work Based Learning, pp. 226-237, (2009); Garnett J., Employers and university partnerships, in employers, skills and higher education, Transdisciplinary Learning and Professional Practice, pp. 81-92, (2007); Garnett J., Contributing to the intellectual capital of organisations, Work Based Learning: Journeys to the Core of Higher Education, (2009); Garnett J., Authentic work integrated learning, University Teaching in Focus: A Learning Centred Approach, pp. 164-179, (2012); Garnett J., Costley C., Workman B., Work Based Learning: Journeys to the Core of Higher Education, (2009); Garnett J., Costley C., Abraham S., Abraham P., Aligning institutional infrastructure to support learning at work: The cases of Middlesex University and the Australian Institute of Business, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Researching Work and Learning, Singapore, 9-11 December, (2015); Garnett J., Workman B., Beadsmore A., Bezencenet S., Developing the structural capital of higher education institutions, Work-based Learning: Workforce Development, Connections, Frameworks and Processes, pp. 18-30, (2008); Gibbs P., Garnett J., Work based learning as a field of study, Journal of Research in Post-compulsory Education, 12, 6, pp. 409-421, (2007); Kaarby K., Lindboe I., The workplace as a learning environment in early childhood teacher education: An investigation of work-based education, Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 17, 2, pp. 8-29, (2015); McGregor S., Transdisciplinary knowledge creation, Transdisciplinary Learning and Professional Practice, pp. 9-24, (2015); Nicolescu B., Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, (2002); Portwood D., An intellectual case for work based learning as a subject, Work Based Learning and the University: New Perspectives and Practices, pp. 17-22, (2000); Portwood D., Towards an epistemology of work-based learning: Eliciting clues from work-based learning projects, Work-based Learning Futures, pp. 8-20, (2007); Portwood D., Garnett J., The construction and validation of an institutional work based learning programme, Work Based Learning and the University: New Perspectives and Practices, pp. 45-50, (2000); Raelin J., Work-based Learning, Josey-bass, (2008); Scott P., The Meanings of Mass Higher Education, (1995); Stewart T., Intellectual Capital, (1997); Wall T., Transforming the research-learning performance of professional lifelong learners, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 189-193, (2014); Walsh A., Beyond a naturally occurring ethnography: The work-based researcher, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 1, 1, pp. 38-51, (2011); White T., Employer responsive provision: Workforce development through work-based learning, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 2, 1, pp. 6-21, (2012)","J. Garnett; Australian Institute of Business, Adelaide, Australia; email: jonathanrguk@yahoo.com","","Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.","","","","","","20423896","","","","English","High Educ. Skills Work Based Learning","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84979763141"
"Hatane S.E.; Nathania F.; Lamuel J.; Darusman F.; Devie","Hatane, Saarce Elsye (57208086781); Nathania, Felicia (57221780188); Lamuel, Jocelyn (57221782321); Darusman, Fenny (57221787525); Devie (57210426711)","57208086781; 57221780188; 57221782321; 57221787525; 57210426711","Intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance in gaining the firms' non-discretionary profits and market value in asean-5","2021","Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies","11","22","","276","304","28","4","10.15388/OMEE.2020.11.34","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100151192&doi=10.15388%2fOMEE.2020.11.34&partnerID=40&md5=efa06f02c5261c870607e5deab80c659","Petra Christian University, Indonesia","Hatane S.E., Petra Christian University, Indonesia; Nathania F., Petra Christian University, Indonesia; Lamuel J., Petra Christian University, Indonesia; Darusman F., Petra Christian University, Indonesia; Devie, Petra Christian University, Indonesia","Copyright © 2020 Saarce Elsye Hatane, Felicia Nathania, Jocelyn Lamuel, Fenny Darusman, Devie. Published by Vilnius University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.; This study aims to find the effect of Intellectual Capital Disclosure (ICD) and Corporate Governance (CG) on firm performance in ASEAN countries. Firm performance is divided into accounting-based performance and market-based performance. The accounting-based performance consists of Non-Discretionary Net Income (NDNI) and Cash Flow Operations (CFO), while market-based performance consists of Tobin's Q and Market-to-Book Ratio (MBR). The measurement of ICD components uses a scoring system. The sample of this research is 112 firms in the industrial technology listed in the stock exchange of ASEAN-5 between 2011 and 2018. This study finds that NDNI increases when firms increase RCD quality. No ICD components are capable of affecting CFO. On the other hand, SCD is a variable that decreases NDNI value. BGEN is found to reduce NDNI and CFO values. RCD is also the only ICD component that can increase market-based performance, especially MBR. HCD consistently lowers the values of MBR and Tobin's Q. BSIZE holds a significant role in raising Tobin's Q score, and BGEN lowers MBR instead. BIND has no part in the market-based performance, but it significantly lowers NDNI value. This study adds another view to ICD's benefits from two firm performance perspectives, accounting-based performance and market-based performance, especially in ASEAN-5. © 2020 Vilnius University. All rights reserved.","Accounting-based performance; Good corporate governance; Intellectual capital disclosure; Market-based performance; Non-discretionary net income","","","","","","","","Abdallah S., External auditor type, discretionary accruals and investors' reactions, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 3, pp. 352-368, (2018); Ahmed-Sheikh N., Wang Z., Khan S., The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance: evidence from Pakistan, International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23, 1, pp. 38-55, (2013); Alfraih M. M., Intellectual capital reporting and its relation to market and financial performance, Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34, 3, pp. 266-281, (2018); An Y., Davey H., Eggleton I. R., Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 4, pp. 571-585, (2011); Anderson A., Gupta P., A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance: Do financial structure and the legal system matter?, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 5, 2, pp. 61-79, (2009); Anifowose M., Abdul Rashid H. M., Annuar H. A., Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate market value: does board diversity matter?, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7, 3, pp. 369-398, (2017); (2018); (2014); Baum C., Chakraborty A., Han L., Liu B., The effects of uncertainty and corporate governance of firms' demand for liquidity, Applied Economics, 44, 4, pp. 515-525, (2012); Ben-Amar W., Francoeur C., Hafsi T., Labelle R., What Makes Better Boards? A Closer Look at Diversity and Ownership, British Journal of Management, 24, pp. 85-101, (2013); Bendickson J., Muldoon J., Liguori E., Davis, Agency theory: the times, they are achangin, Management Decision, 54, 1, pp. 174-193, (2016); Bhatt P., Bhatt R., Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia, Corporate Governance, 17, 5, pp. 896-912, (2017); Bontis N., Intellectual capital questionnaire, (1997); Boujelben S., Fedhila H., The effects of intangible investments on future OCF, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 4, pp. 480-494, (2011); Buniamin S., Johari N., Rahmen N., Abd R., Abdul F., Board diversity and discretionary accruals of the top 100 Malaysia corporate government (MCG) index company, African Journal of business management, 6, 29, pp. 8496-8503, (2012); Cabrita M. D., de Silva M. L., Rodrigues A. M. G., Duenas M. D., Competitiveness and disclosure of intellectual capital: an empirical research in Portuguese banks, JournalofIntellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 486-505, (2017); Cheng M.-Y., Lin J.-Y., Hsiao T.-Y., Lin T., Invested resource, competitive intellectual capital, and corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 4, pp. 433-450, (2010); Corbacho A., Peiris S. J., The ASEAN Way: Sustaining Growth and Stability, (2018); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Daghsni O., Zouhayer M., Mbarek K., Earnings management and board characteristics: Evidence from French listed firms, Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6, 5, pp. 1-9, (2016); Fidanoski F., Simeonovski K., Mateska V., The Impact of Board Diversity on Corporate Performance: New Evidence from Southeast Europe, Corporate Governance in the US and Global Settings, 17, pp. 81-123, (2014); Gamerschlag R., Value relevance of human capital information, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 325-345, (2013); Gates S., Human capital measures, strategy and performance: Human resources managers perception, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, pp. 111-132, (2010); Gnirck M., The 5 Driving Factors Behind ASEAN's Imminent FinTech Boom, (2017); Gonzalez J., Garcia-Meca E., Does corporate governance influence earnings management in Latin American markets?, Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 3, pp. 419-440, (2014); Gordini N., Rancati E., Gender Diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance, Management Research Review, 40, 1, pp. 75-94, (2017); Gujarati D. N., Basic Econometrics, (2012); Guthrie J., Involuntary Disclosure of Intellectual Capital: Is It Relevant?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 29-44, (2017); Haji A. A., Ghazali N. A. M., A longitudinal examination of intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance attributes in Malaysia, Asian Review of Accounting, 21, 1, pp. 27-52, (2013); Hamdan A., Intellectual capital and firm performance: Differentiating between accounting-based and market-based performance, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance, 11, 1, pp. 139-151, (2018); Hatane S., Rembulan D., Tarigan J., Intellectual capital disclosures and audit components in non-discretionary income, MIX: Journal of Management and Science, 9, 1, pp. 124-140, (2019); Hejazi R., Ghanbari M., Alipour M., Intellectual, human and structural capital effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's Q, Knowledge and Process Management, 23, 4, pp. 259-273, (2016); Henry L., Intellectual capital in a recession: evidence from UK SMEs, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 84-101, (2013); Ho K., An Y., The effect of ownership-control disparity on the Chinese firm's real activity earnings management, Pacific Accounting Review, 30, 4, pp. 482-499, (2018); Inkinen H., Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 518-565, (2015); Jones J. J., Earnings management during import relief investigations, Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 2, pp. 193-228, (1991); Jordao R., Almeida V., Performance measurement, intellectual capital, and financial sustainability, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 3, pp. 643-666, (2017); Joshi M., Cahill D., Sidhu J., Intellectual capital and financial performance: An evaluation of the Australian financial sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 264-285, (2013); Kabir R., Thai H., Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance?, Pacific Accounting Review, 29, 2, pp. 227-258, (2017); Khlif H., Souissi M., The determinants of corporate disclosure: a meta-analysis, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 18, 3, pp. 198-219, (2010); Kiattikulwattana P., Earnings management and voluntary disclosure of management's responsibility for the financial reports, Asian Review of Accounting, 22, 3, pp. 233-256, (2014); Kilic M., Kuzey C., The effect of board gender diversity on firm performance: evidence from Turkey, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31, 7, pp. 434-455, (2016); Kolsi M. C., Grassa R., Did corporate governance mechanisms affect earnings management? Further evidence from GCC Islamic banks, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, pp. 2-23, (2017); Kumar N., Singh J., Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: some empirical findings from India, Corporate Governance, 13, 1, pp. 88-98, (2013); Kumari P., Pattanayak J., Linking earnings management practices and corporate governance system with the firms' financial performance, Journal of Financial Crime, 24, 2, pp. 223-241, (2017); Liu L., Qu W., Haman J., Product market competition, state-ownership, corporate governance and firm performance, Asian Review of Accounting, 26, 1, pp. 62-83, (2018); Lopes I. T., Ferraz D. P., Rodrigues A. M., The drivers of profitability in the top 30 major airlines worldwide, Measuring Business Excellence, 20, 2, pp. 26-37, (2016); Malik M., Makhdoom D., Does corporate governance beget firm performance in Fortune Global 500 companies?, Corporate Governance, 16, 4, pp. 747-764, (2016); Mangena M., Li J., Tauringana V., Disentangling the effects of corporate disclosure on the cost of equity capital: A study of the role of intellectual capital disclosure, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 31, 1, pp. 3-27, (2014); Marinova J., Plantenga J., Remery C., Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 15, pp. 1777-1790, (2015); Masa'deh R., Mohammad T., Jarrah I., Tarhini A., Accounting vs. Market-based Measures of Firm Performance Related to Information Technology Investments, International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9, 1, pp. 129-145, (2015); Memon Z., Chen Y., Tauni M., The impact of cash flow volatility on firm leverage and debt maturity structure: Evidence from China, China Finance Review International, 8, 1, pp. 69-91, (2018); Mention A., Bontis N., Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2, pp. 286-309, (2013); Mishra R., Kapil S., Effect of board characteristics on firm value: Evidence from India, South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7, 1, pp. 41-72, (2018); Mitchell R., Meacheam D., Knowledge worker control: understanding via principal and agency theory, The Learning Organization, 18, 2, pp. 149-160, (2011); Mondal A., Ghosh S., Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 4, pp. 515-530, (2012); Mourshed M., Quddus M. A., Renewable energy RD&D expenditure and CO2 emissions in 15 European countries, International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 3, 2, pp. 187-202, (2009); Mustafa G., Li H., Zhang J., Deng J., ℓ1-Regression based subdivision schemes for noisy data, Computer-Aided Design, 58, pp. 189-199, (2015); Nadeem M., Gan C., Nguyen C., Does intellectual capital efficiency improve firm performance in BRICS economies? A dynamic panel estimation, Measuring Business Excellence, 21, 1, pp. 65-85, (2017); Nagar N., Raithatha M., Does good corporate governance constrain cash flow manipulation? Evidence from India, Managerial Finance, 42, 11, pp. 1034-1053, (2016); Nimtrakoon S., The relationship between intellectual capital, firms' market value and financial performance: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 587-618, (2015); Orens R., Aerts W., Lybaert N., Intellectual capital disclosure, cost of finance, and firm value, Management Decision, 47, 10, pp. 1536-1554, (2009); Rahman S., The role of intellectual capital in determining differences between stock market and financial performance, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 89, pp. 46-77, (2012); Salehi M., Enayati G., Javadi P., The relationship between intellectual capital with economic value added and financial performance, Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 7, 2, pp. 245-269, (2014); Scafarto V., Ricci F., Scafarto F., Intellectual capital and firm performance in the global agribusiness industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 3, pp. 530-552, (2016); Schiemann F., Richter K., Gunther T., The relationship between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16, 2, pp. 240-264, (2015); Siagian F., Siregar S. V., Rahardian Y., Corporate governance, reporting quality, and firm value: evidence from Indonesia, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 3, 1, pp. 4-20, (2013); Siddiqui S. S., The association between corporate governance and firm performance - A meta-analysis, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 23, 3, pp. 218-237, (2015); Simion D., Toba D., Impact analysis of the relationship: Intellectual capital, performance and social responsibility of the organization, Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 63-75, (2018); Simsek Z., Heavey C., The mediating role of knowledge-based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small to medium-sized firms, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 1, pp. 81-100, (2011); Singh S., Tabassum N., Darwish T., Batsakis G., Corporate governance and Tobin's Q as a measure of organizational performance, British Journal of Management, 29, 1, pp. 171-190, (2017); Siregar S., Utama S., Type of earnings management and the effect of ownership structure, firm size, and corporate-governance practices: Evidence from Indonesia, The International Journal of Accounting, 43, 1, pp. 1-27, (2008); Subramanyam K. R., The pricing of discretionary accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 1-3, (1996); Suprianto E., Setiawan D., Impact of family control on the relationship between earning management and future performance in Indonesia, Business and Economic Horizons, 14, 2, pp. 342-354, (2018); Tarigan J., Hervindra C., Hatane S. E., Does Board Diversity Influence Financial Performance?, International Research Journal of Business Studies, 11, 3, pp. 195-215, (2018); Vafaei A., Taylor D., Ahmed K., The value relevance of intellectual capital disclosures, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12, 3, pp. 407-429, (2011); Wahyudin A., Solikhah B., Corporate governance implementation rating in Indonesia and its effects on financial performance, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17, 2, pp. 250-265, (2017); Yang Y., Do aggressive pro forma earnings-reporting firms have difficulty disclosing intellectual capital? Australian evidence, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 768-786, (2018); Zeghal A., Financial statement informativeness and intellectual capital, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13, 1, pp. 66-90, (2015); Zhu T., Lu M., Shan Y., Zhang Y., Accrual-based and real activity earnings management at the back door: Evidence from Chinese reverse mergers, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 12, pp. 317-339, (2015); Zyl J. M. V., Schall R., Parameter estimation through weighted least-squares rank regression with specific reference to the Weibull and Gumbel Distributions, Communication in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 41, 9, pp. 1654-1666, (2012)","S.E. Hatane; Petra Christian University, Indonesia; email: elsyehat@petra.ac.id","","Vilnius University","","","","","","20294581","","","","English","Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85100151192"
"Nicolo’ G.; Manes-Rossi F.; Christiaens J.; Aversano N.","Nicolo’, Giuseppe (57195628696); Manes-Rossi, Francesca (56246962700); Christiaens, Johan (35835636200); Aversano, Natalia (55647167100)","57195628696; 56246962700; 35835636200; 55647167100","Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities","2020","Journal of Management and Governance","24","4","","1055","1087","32","33","10.1007/s10997-019-09497-7","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077613578&doi=10.1007%2fs10997-019-09497-7&partnerID=40&md5=707467014d33c97e0a0d4b54a7ef5be8","Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084, SA, Italy; Department of Economics, Management and Institutions, University of Napoli–Federico II, Via Cintia, Monte Sant’Angelo, Naples, 80126, Italy; Public Governance, Management and Finance Department, University of Ghent, Sint-Pietersplein, 7, Ghent, 9000, Belgium; Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics Department, University of Basilicata, Via Ateneo Lucano, 10 (Campus di Macchia Romana), Potenza, 85100, Italy","Nicolo’ G., Management and Innovation Systems Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano, 84084, SA, Italy; Manes-Rossi F., Department of Economics, Management and Institutions, University of Napoli–Federico II, Via Cintia, Monte Sant’Angelo, Naples, 80126, Italy; Christiaens J., Public Governance, Management and Finance Department, University of Ghent, Sint-Pietersplein, 7, Ghent, 9000, Belgium; Aversano N., Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics Department, University of Basilicata, Via Ateneo Lucano, 10 (Campus di Macchia Romana), Potenza, 85100, Italy","This paper aims to investigate intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) provided by Italian public universities in their annual reports and to identify and examine its drivers. An empirical analysis of annual reports of Italian public universities for the year 2014 is conducted through content analysis. The information retrieved from this forms the basis for regression analysis (OLS model) to relate the disclosure index to its drivers which include governance features, financial performance and control variables. The empirical analysis shows that human and internal (organisational) capital are the most disclosed categories of intellectual capital. The results also show that board independence and university size positively affect ICD in Italian public universities. The methodology adopted in this study could be replicated for other countries to obtain a better understanding of how ICD can help meet stakeholder information needs. The results provide a useful basis for further investigation into ICD drivers and influences and may also enable regulators and standard setters to better understand and regulate IC practices in universities. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.","Accountability; Content analysis; Disclosure; Intellectual capital; Italian university","","","","","","","","Akhtaruddin M., Corporate mandatory disclosure practices in Bangladesh, The International Journal of Accounting, 40, 4, pp. 399-422, (2005); Almqvist R., Skoog M., Colliding discourses? New public management from an intellectual capital perspective, pp. 100-123, (2007); Atinc G., Simmering M.J., Kroll M.J., Control variable use and reporting in macro and micro management research, Organizational Research Methods, 15, 1, pp. 57-74, (2012); Aversano N., Manes-Rossi F., Tartaglia-Polcini P., Performance Measurement Systems in Universities: A Critical Review of the Italian System, pp. 269-287, (2017); Bachiller P., Giorgino M.C., Paternostro S., Influence of board of directors on firm performance: Analysis of family and non-family firms, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 12, 3, pp. 230-253, (2015); Badia F., Dicuonzo G., Petruzzelli S., Dell'Atti V., Integrated reporting in action: Mobilizing intellectual capital to improve management and governance practices, Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 2, pp. 299-320, (2019); Banks W., Fisher J., Nelson M., University accountability in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: 1992–1994, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 6, 2, pp. 211-226, (1997); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Citro F., Tommasetti A., Disclosure of university websites. Evidence from Italian data, Global Business and Economics Review, 16, 4, pp. 452-471, (2014); Bodnar V., Harangozo T., Tirnitz T., Revesz E., Kovats G., Managing intellectual capital in hungarian universities—the case of corvinus university of budapest, Paper Presented at the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, (2009); Boesso G., Kumar K., Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 2, pp. 269-296, (2007); Bozzolan S., Favotto F., Ricceri F., Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: an empirical analysis, Journal of Intellectual capital, 4, 4, pp. 543-558, (2003); Brown K.W., The 10-point test of financial condition: Toward an easy-to-use assessment tool for smaller cities, Government Finance Review, 9, (1993); Brown W.A., Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 3, pp. 317-339, (2005); Brusca I., Manes Rossi F., Aversano N., Online sustainability information in local governments in an austerity context: An empirical analysis in Italy and Spain, Online Information Review, 40, 4, pp. 497-514, (2016); Canibano L., Sanchez P., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities and research institutions, Estudios de economía aplicada, 26, 2, pp. 7-26, (2008); Capano G., Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector, Public Administration, 89, 4, pp. 1622-1642, (2011); Cerbioni F., Parbonetti A., Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: an analysis of European biotechnology companies, European Accounting Review, 16, 4, pp. 791-826, (2007); Christiaens J., Financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities: an empirical investigation, Financial Accountability & Management, 15, 1, pp. 21-40, (1999); Christopher J., Governance paradigms of public universities: An international comparative study, Tertiary Education and Management, 18, 4, pp. 335-351, (2012); Cinquini L., Passetti E., Tenucci A., Frey M., Analyzing intellectual capital information in sustainability reports: Some empirical evidence, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 4, pp. 531-561, (2012); Cohen S., Vlismas O., Analysing the relationship between intellectual capital and performance in local governments, Global Business and Economics Review, 15, 2-3, pp. 233-250, (2013); Copeland R.M., Ingram R.W., The association between municipal accounting information and bond rating changes, Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 2, pp. 275-289, (1982); Coy D., Fischer M., Gordon T., Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 1, pp. 1-31, (2001); Coy D., Tower G., Dixon K., Quantifying the quality of tertiary education annual reports, Accounting and Finance, 33, 2, pp. 121-130, (1993); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J., Martinez-Ferrero J., The role of media pressure on the disclosure of sustainability information by local governments, Online Information Review, 38, 1, pp. 114-135, (2014); Intellectual Capital Statements ± the New Guideline, Copenhagen, (2003); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dumay J., Cai L., Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: a critique, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 121-155, (2015); Edvinsson L., Developing intellectual capital at Skandia, Long Range Planning, 30, 3, pp. 320-373, (1997); Ricardis: Reporting intellectual capital to augment research, development and innovation in SMEs, Report to the Commission of the High Level Expert Group on RICARDIS, (2006); Farneti F., Siboni B., An analysis of the Italian governmental guidelines and of the local governments’ practices for social reports, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2, 1, pp. 101-125, (2011); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a University, Paper Presented at the Conference on Trends in the Management of Human Resources in Higher Education, (2005); Ferlie E., Andresani G., United Kingdom from bureau professionalism to New Public Management, University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives, pp. 177-195, (2008); Ferlie E., Musselin C., Andresani G., The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective, Higher Education, 56, 3, pp. 325-348, (2008); Gallego-Alvarez I., Rodriguez-Dominguez L., Garcia-Sanchez I.M., Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: Content and explanatory factors, Online Information Review, 35, 3, pp. 360-385, (2011); La rendicontazione sociale negli intangibili. Documento di ricerca n. 8, (2008); Goebel V., Is the literature on content analysis of intellectual capital reporting heading towards a dead end?, Journal Of Intellectual Capital, 16, 3, pp. 681-699, (2015); Goh P.C., Lim K.P., Disclosing intellectual capital in company annual reports: evidence from Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 3, pp. 500-510, (2004); Gordon T., Fischer M., Malone D., Tower G., A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the United States, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 3, pp. 235-275, (2002); Gray R., Guthrie J., Parker L.D., Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship, Accounting Forum, 26, 1, pp. 1-30, (2002); Guthrie J., Petty R., Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices, Journal of intellectual capital, 1, 3, pp. 241-251, (2000); Guthrie J., Petty R., Ricceri F., The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia, Journal of intellectual capital, 7, 2, pp. 254-271, (2006); Guthrie J., Petty R., Yongvanich K., Ricceri F., Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting, Journal of intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 282-293, (2004); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 4-5, pp. 319-337, (2013); Helfaya A., Whittington M., Alawattage C., Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting: Surveying Preparers’ and Users’ Perceptions, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32, 1, pp. 163-193, (2019); Husin N., Hooper K., Olesen K., Analysis of intellectual capital disclosure–an illustrative example, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 2, pp. 196-220, (2012); Ingram R.W., Copeland R.M., Municipal accounting information and voting behavior, Accounting Review, LV, 1, 4, pp. 830-843, (1981); Ismail S., Abu Bakar N.B., Reporting practices of Malaysian public universities: The extent of accountability disclosure, African Journal of Business Management, 5, 15, pp. 6366-6376, (2011); Kivisto J., An assessment of agency theory as a framework for the government–university relationship, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30, 4, pp. 339-350, (2008); Krippendorff K., Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, (1980); Krippendorff K., Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, (2004); Laswad F., Fisher R., Oyelere P., Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 2, pp. 101-121, (2005); Lee R.L., Joseph R.C., An examination of web disclosure and organizational transparency, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 6, pp. 2218-2224, (2013); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application within the reorganization of Austrian universities, Paper Presented at the Transparent Enterprise, the Value of Intangibles Conference, Autonomous University of Madrid Ministry of Economy, (2002); Leitner K.H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Li J., Pike R., Haniffa R., Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms, Accounting And Business Research, 38, 2, pp. 137-159, (2008); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Maingot M., Zeghal D., An analysis of voluntary disclosure of performance indicators by Canadian universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 14, 4, pp. 269-283, (2008); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 814-835, (2018); Meoli M., Paleari S., Vismara S., The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs, Small Business Economics, 52, 2, pp. 485-504, (2019); Guidelines for managing and reporting on intangibles, (2002); Milne M.J., Adler R.W., Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12, 2, pp. 237-256, (1999); Nelson M., Elliot J., Tarpley R., How are earnings managed? Examples from auditors, Accounting Horizons, 17, pp. 17-35, (2003); Neumann R., Guthrie J., The corporatization of research in Australian higher education, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 5-6, pp. 721-741, (2002); Ntim C.G., Soobaroyen T., Broad M.J., Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability: The case of UK higher education institutions, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30, 1, pp. 65-118, (2017); Nurunnabi M., Hossain M., Hossain M., Intellectual capital reporting in a South Asian country: evidence from Bangladesh, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 15, 3, pp. 196-233, (2011); Methodological guide, (2006); Parker L., University corporatisation: Driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Pucci T., Simoni C., Zanni L., Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance, Journal of Management and Governance, 19, 3, pp. 589-616, (2015); Raffournier B., The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies, European Accounting Review, 4, 2, pp. 261-280, (1995); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Merino E., Manzaneque M., Examining the intellectual capital web reporting by Spanish universities, Online Information Review, Forthcoming., (2019); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities: A new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Sanchez M.P., Castrillo R., Elena S., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities, Paper Presented at the International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Castrillo R., Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 2, pp. 307-324, (2009); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Saxton G.D., Guo C., Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 2, pp. 270-295, (2011); Schneider A., Samkin G., Intellectual capital reporting by the New Zealand local government sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 3, pp. 456-486, (2008); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.H., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: A dynamic approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Sonnier B.M., Carson K.D., Carson P.P., An examination of the impact of firm size and age on managerial disclosure of intellectual capital by high-tech companies, Journal of Business Strategies, 26, 2, pp. 1-24, (2009); Steenkamp N., Northcott D., Content analysis in accounting research: The practical challenges, Australian Accounting Review, 17, 43, pp. 12-25, (2007); Sveiby K.E., The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets, (1997); Tabachnik B.G., Fidell L.S., Using multivariate statistics, (2001); Tregidga H., Milne M., Lehman G., Analyzing the quality, meaning and accountability of organizational reporting and communication: Directions for future research, Accounting Forum, 36, 3, pp. 223-230, (2012); Turri M., The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): A need for governance or legitimacy?, Quality in Higher education, 20, 1, pp. 64-82, (2014); University Organisation Amendment Act and Universities of the Arts Organisation Amendment Act, N. 120/2002/9Th August, (2002); Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M., Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, 2, pp. 175-192, (2014); Veltri S., Puntillo P., On intellectual capital management as an evaluation criterion for university managers: a case study, Journal of Management and Governance, 2019, pp. 1-33, (2019); Windels P., Christiaens J., Management reform in Flemish public centres for social welfare: examining organisational change, Local Government Studies, 32, 4, pp. 389-411, (2006)","F. Manes-Rossi; Department of Economics, Management and Institutions, University of Napoli–Federico II, Naples, Via Cintia, Monte Sant’Angelo, 80126, Italy; email: manes@unina.it","","Springer","","","","","","13853457","","","","English","J. Manage. Gov.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85077613578"
"Aversano N.; Nicolò G.; Sannino G.; Tartaglia Polcini P.","Aversano, Natalia (55647167100); Nicolò, Giuseppe (57195628696); Sannino, Giuseppe (57192982774); Tartaglia Polcini, Paolo (57200109261)","55647167100; 57195628696; 57192982774; 57200109261","The Integrated Plan in Italian public universities: new patterns in intellectual capital disclosure","2020","Meditari Accountancy Research","28","4","","655","679","24","20","10.1108/MEDAR-07-2019-0519","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082403874&doi=10.1108%2fMEDAR-07-2019-0519&partnerID=40&md5=1fdfdedb1b3ca4c9dd30ca17d64ab1c5","Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy; Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; Department of Economics, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Capua, Italy","Aversano N., Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy; Nicolò G., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy; Sannino G., Department of Economics, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Capua, Italy; Tartaglia Polcini P., Department of Management and Innovation Systems, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy","Purpose: The present research aims to analyse the extent to which Italian public universities disclose intellectual capital (IC) information through the Integrated Plan and the main features of IC disclosure (ICD) in terms of form and location in the document. Design/methodology/approach: Adopting a qualitative methodology, a content analysis is conducted to examine the level, form and location of ICD provided by a sample of 60 Italian public universities through the 2018-2020 integrated plans. Findings: The results show a medium level of ICD in the Integrated Plan, with human capital being the category most disclosed. Information is principally provided in a quantitative form and is mainly found in the first two sections of the document (i.e. relating to the strategic framework and organisational performance). Research limitations/implications: The analysis is necessarily limited to a single period (2018-2020), because of the recent introduction of the guidelines of the Integrated Plan. However, the results may be beneficial to policymakers in determining the usefulness of this new tool in detecting information about intangible resources and can help universities’ governors and managers in defining adequate IC strategies to create value for the whole ecosystem. Originality/value: The study makes an innovative contribution to the international debate about IC in universities in light of the fourth stage of IC research, exploring an emerging tool to detect whether it is able to convey IC information to the wide range of university stakeholders and to communicate the value universities contribute to society. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Disclosure; Integrated Plan; Intellectual capital; Italian university; Third mission","","","","","","","","Almqvist R., Skoog M., Colliding discourses? New public management from an intellectual capital perspective, Intellectual Capital Revisited: Paradoxes in the Knowledge Intensive Organization, pp. 100-123, (2007); Linee Guida per la gestione integrata del Ciclo della Performance delle università statali italiane, (2015); Linee guida SUA-Terza Missione e Impatto Sociale delle Università italiane, (2018); Aversano N., Manes-Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Performance measurement systems in universities: a critical review of the Italian system, Outcome-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector, pp. 269-287, (2017); Beattie V., Thomson S.J., Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures, Accounting Forum, 31, 2, pp. 129-163, (2007); Bezhani I., Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 179-207, (2010); Bisogno M., Dumay J., Manes Rossi F., Tartaglia Polcini P., Identifying future directions for IC research in education: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 10-33, (2018); Cooke T.E., Disclosure in the corporate annual reports of Swedish companies, Accounting and Business Research, 19, 74, pp. 113-124, (1989); Cricelli L., Greco M., Grimaldi M., Llanes Duenas L.P., Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: evidence from colombian public universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 71-95, (2018); Cuozzo B., Dumay J., Palmaccio M., Lombardi R., Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 1, pp. 9-28, (2017); Di Berardino D., Corsi C., A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 178-201, (2018); Dumay J., A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 1, pp. 168-184, (2016); Dumay J., Cai L., Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: a critique, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 1, pp. 121-155, (2015); Dumay J., Garanina T., Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 1, pp. 10-25, (2013); Guthrie J., Petty R., Ricceri F., The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 2, pp. 254-271, (2006); Guthrie J., Petty R., Yongvanich K., Ricceri F., Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 2, pp. 282-293, (2004); Habersam M., Piber M., Skoog M., Ten years of using knowledge balance sheets in Austrian public universities: a retrospective and prospective view, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 34-52, (2018); Hair J.F., Celsi W., Money A.H., Samouel P., Page M.J., Essentials of Business Research Methods, (2003); Krippendorff K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, (1980); Krippendorff K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, (2004); Leitner K.H., Intellectual Capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Lev B., Canibano L., Marr B., An accounting perspective on intellectual capital, Perspectives on Intellectual Capital, pp. 42-55, (2005); Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J., Nappo F., Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: the case of the University of Bari, Management Decision, 57, 12, (2019); Low M., Samkin G., Li Y., Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 4, pp. 779-808, (2015); Manes Rossi F., Nicolo G., Tartaglia Polcini P., New trends in intellectual capital reporting: exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 4, pp. 814-835, (2018); Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., When the investors speak: intellectual Capital disclosure and the web 2.0, Management Decision, 55, 9, pp. 1888-1904, (2017); Milne M.J., Adler R.W., Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12, 2, pp. 237-256, (1999); Ndou V., Secundo G., Dumay J., Gjevori E., Understanding intellectual capital disclosure in online media big data: an exploratory case study in a university, Meditari Accountancy Research, 26, 3, pp. 499-530, (2018); Nelson M., Banks W., Fisher J., Improved accountability disclosures by Canadian Universities, Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 2, 1, pp. 77-107, (2003); Ntim C.G., Soobaroyen T., Broad M.J., Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability: the case of UK higher education institutions, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 1, pp. 65-118, (2017); Parker L., University corporatisation: driving redefinition, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 4, pp. 434-450, (2011); Ramirez Y., Gordillo S., Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, 1, pp. 173-188, (2014); Ramirez Y., Merino E., Manzaneque M., Examining the intellectual capital web reporting by Spanish Universities, Online Information Review, 43, 5, pp. 775-798, (2019); Ramirez Y., Tejada A., Manzaneque M., The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish Universities: a new challenge of our days, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29, 2, pp. 176-198, (2016); Sanchez M.P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sanchez M.P., Castrillo R., Elena S., Intellectual capital management and reporting in universities, paper presented at the International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: History and New Perspectives, (2006); Sangiorgi D., Siboni B., The disclosure of intellectual capital in italian universities: what has been done and what should be done, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 354-372, (2017); Secundo G., Lombardi R., Dumay J., Intellectual capital in education, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 2-9, (2018); Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Dumay J., Passiante G., Intellectual capital in the age of big data: establishing a research agenda, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 2, pp. 242-261, (2017); Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., Passiante G., Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17, 2, pp. 298-319, (2016); Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K., An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European Universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 419-442, (2015); Secundo G., Massaro M., Dumay J., Bagnoli C., Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: a critical case study in university settings, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19, 1, pp. 157-177, (2018); Siboni B., Nardo M.T., Sangiorgi D., Italian state university contemporary performance plans: an intellectual capital focus?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 414-430, (2013); Steenkamp N., Northcott D., Content analysis in accounting research: the practical challenges, Australian Accounting Review, 17, 43, pp. 12-25, (2007); Brusca I., Cohen S., Manes-Rossi F., Nicolo G., Intellectual capital disclosure and academic rankings in European universities, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 1, (2019); Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., Passiante G., Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11, 2, pp. 140-157, (2010)","N. Aversano; Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy; email: natalia.aversano@unibas.it","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","2049372X","","","","English","Meditari Account. Res.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85082403874"
"Villasalero M.","Villasalero, Manuel (36663157100)","36663157100","University knowledge, open innovation and technological capital in Spanish science parks: Research revealing or technology selling?","2014","Journal of Intellectual Capital","15","4","","479","496","17","37","10.1108/JIC-07-2014-0083","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84914118631&doi=10.1108%2fJIC-07-2014-0083&partnerID=40&md5=451ff1e714e7e63cb2f5aa0e4282063b","Department of Business Administration, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain","Villasalero M., Department of Business Administration, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain","Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the connection between university research and technological capital developed by science park (SCP) firms in order to elucidate whether the causal linkage is owing to non-pecuniary research spillovers or pecuniary technology transfer activities.; Design/methodology/approach – Two publicly available surveys, one dealing with the research and transfer activities of 45 Spanish universities and another with the patenting activities of 44 Spanish SCPs, are matched in such a way that hypotheses can be tested using regression analysis.; Findings – The patenting performance of SCP firms is positively related to the competitive R&D projects undertaken by the universities to which they are affiliated and negatively related to the technology transfer activities carried out by those universities. These findings suggest that the scientific knowledge produced by universities principally contributes to private technology-based firms’ technological capital through non-pecuniary research spillovers, whereas the pecuniary technology transfer agreements remain uncertain or may even prove to be detrimental.; Practical implications – Firms that are considering locating or remaining in a university-affiliated SCP should be aware that the university’s pecuniary orientation when managing its intellectual capital may become a barrier as regards the firm filling its technological capital shortages. From a university administrator perspective, the complementary or substitute role of technology transfer offices vis-à -vis SCPs should be considered in the light of the selling or revealing approach adopted by the university in order to commercialize and diffuse potential inventions.; Originality/value – This study contributes to existing literature by shedding light on the causal linkage between university research and firm innovation, obtaining evidence in favor of an upstream, non-pecuniary and revealing role of universities in support of the accumulation of technological capital amongst SCPs tenant firms. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.","Intellectual capital; Knowledge spillovers; Knowledge transfer; Licensing income; Patents; Tacit knowledge","","","","","","","","Andersen K.V., Optimal Levels of Embeddedness: The Contingent Value of Networked Collaboration, (2011); Andersen K.V., The problem of embeddedness revisited: Collaboration and market types, Research Policy, 42, 1, pp. 139-148, (2013); Patentes En Los Parques Científicos Y Tecnológicos Miembros De APTE, (2011); Arundel A., Van De Paal G., Soete L., Innovation Strategies of Europe’s Largest Industrial Firms, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, (1995); Boschma R.A., Ter Wal A., Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the south of Italy, Industry and Innovation, 14, 2, pp. 177-199, (2007); Breschi S., Lissoni F., Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, pp. 975-1005, (2001); Broekel T., Boschma R., Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox, Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 2, pp. 409-433, (2012); Buchel B., Raub S., Building knowledge-creating value networks, European Management Journal, 20, 6, pp. 587-596, (2002); Caldera A., Debande O., Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 39, 9, pp. 1160-1173, (2010); Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (2003); Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 1-23, (2002); Colombo M.G., Delmastro M., How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, 31, 7, pp. 1103-1122, (2002); Cooke P., Regional innovation systems, clean technology & Jacobian cluster-platform policies, Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1, 1, pp. 23-45, (2008); Informe De La Encuesta De Investigación Y Transferencia De Conocimiento 2010 De Las Universidades Españ Olas, (2011); Chan K.-Y.A., Oerlemans L., Pretorius M.W., Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: The Innovation Hub Case, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22, 2, pp. 207-228, (2010); Chan K.-Y.A., Oerlemans L., Pretorius T., Innovation outcomes of South African new technology-based firms: A contribution to the debate on the performance of science park firms, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 14, 4, pp. 361-378, (2011); Chesbrough H.W., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, (2003); Chesbrough H.W., Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, (2006); Chesbrough H.W., Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era, (2011); Dahlander L., Gann D.M., How open is innovation?, Research Policy, 39, 6, pp. 699-709, (2010); Dettwiler P., Lindelof P., Lofsten H., Utility of location: A comparative survey between small new technology-based firms located on and off science parks – implications for facilities management, Technovation, 26, 4, pp. 506-517, (2006); Fabrizio K.R., The use of university research in firm innovation, Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, pp. 134-160, (2006); Ferguson R., Olofsson C., Science parks and the development of NTBFs – location, survival and growth, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 1, pp. 5-17, (2004); Fukugawa N., Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 2, pp. 381-400, (2006); Furman J.L., Macgarvie M., Academic collaboration and organizational innovation: The development of research capabilities in the US pharmaceutical industry, 1927-1946, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 5, pp. 929-961, (2009); Giuliani E., The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry, Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 2, pp. 139-168, (2007); Hagedoorn J., Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960, Research Policy, 31, 4, pp. 477-492, (2002); Hansen M.T., Mors M.L., Lovas B., Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 5, pp. 776-793, (2005); Hansson F., Husted K., Vestergaard J., Second generation science parks: From structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society, Technovation, 25, 9, pp. 1039-1049, (2005); Hoegl M., Parboteeah K.P., Munson C.L., Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks, Decision Sciences, 34, 4, pp. 741-770, (2003); Howells J., The geography of knowledge: Never so close but never so far apart, Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 5, pp. 1003-1020, (2012); Huggins R., Johnston A., Steffenson R., Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 2, pp. 321-340, (2008); Inkpen A.C., Tsang E., Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer, Academy of Management Review, 30, 1, pp. 146-165, (2005); Kocak O., Can O., Determinants of inter-firm networks among tenants of science technology parks, Industrial and Corporate Change, 23, 2, pp. 467-492, (2014); Lindelof P., Lofsten H., Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms – assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off science parks, Omega, 30, 3, pp. 143-154, (2002); Lindelof P., Lofsten H., Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden – implications for strategy and performance, Small Business Economics, 20, 3, pp. 245-258, (2003); Lindelof P., Lofsten H., Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 3-4, pp. 311-326, (2004); Link A.N., Scott J.T., U.S. Science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 9, pp. 1323-1356, (2003); Link A.N., Scott J.T., Research, science, and technology parks: Vehicles for technology transfer, Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship, (2014); Lofsten H., Lindelof P., Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms, Technovation, 23, 1, pp. 51-64, (2003); Lofsten H., Lindelof P., R&D networks and product innovation patterns – academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks, Technovation, 25, 9, pp. 1025-1037, (2005); Mansfield E., Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1, pp. 1-12, (1991); Mansfield E., Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings, Research Policy, 26, 7-8, pp. 773-776, (1998); Mansfield E., Lee J.-Y., The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support, Research Policy, 25, 7, pp. 1047-1058, (1996); Martinez-Canas R., Ruiz-Palomino P., Social capital generation inside science parks: An analysis of business-university relationships, International Journal of Management and Information Systems, 14, 4, pp. 45-50, (2010); Massey D.B., Qunitas P., Wield D., High-Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, (1992); Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A., The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. Universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, Research Policy, 30, 1, pp. 99-119, (2001); Nelson R.R., Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 1-2, pp. 13-19, (2001); Nerkar A., Paruchuri S., Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm, Management Science, 51, 5, pp. 771-785, (2005); Perkmann M., West J., Open science and open innovation: Sourcing knowledge from universities, Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship, (2014); Phan P.H., Siegel D.S., Wright M., Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2, pp. 165-182, (2005); Salter A.J., Martin B.R., The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review, Research Policy, 30, 3, pp. 509-532, (2001); Schiavone F., Villasalero M., Creativity, organizational knowledge, and the power of dreams, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 3, pp. 279-292, (2013); Schillaci C.E., Romano M., Nicotra M., Science Parks and Entrepreneurship: Enhancing Territorial Absorptive Capacity in a Hostile Region, (2012); Schroll A., Mild A., Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 4, pp. 475-495, (2011); Siegel D.S., Westhead P., Wright M., Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: Exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 9, pp. 1357-1369, (2003); Siegel D.S., Westhead P., Wright M., Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: A review of recent U.K. evidence and an agenda for future research, Small Business Economics, 20, 2, pp. 177-184, (2003); Soetanto D., Jack S., Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms, Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 4, pp. 432-453, (2013); Sorenson O., Rivkin J.W., Fleming L., Complexity, networks and knowledge flow, Research Policy, 35, 7, pp. 994-1017, (2006); Squicciarini M., Science parks’ tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 1, pp. 45-71, (2008); Stephan P.E., The economics of science, Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 3, pp. 1199-1235, (1996); Sterckx S., Patenting and licensing of university research: Promoting innovation or undermining academic values?, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 1, pp. 45-64, (2011); Storper M., The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, 3, pp. 191-221, (1995); Todtling F., Trippl M., Knowledge links in high-technology industries: Markets, networks or milieu? The case of the Vienna biotechnology cluster, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7, 2, pp. 345-365, (2007); Van Geenhuizen M., Soetanto D.P., Open innovation among university spin-off firms: What is in it for them, and what can cities do?, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 25, 2, pp. 191-207, (2012); Villasalero M., Signaling, spillover and learning effects of knowledge flows on division performance within related diversified firms, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 6, pp. 928-942, (2013); Villasalero M., Intra-network knowledge roles and division performance in multi-business firms, Journal of Knowledge Management, (2014); Villasalero M., Multi-Business Firms, Knowledge Flows and Intra-Network Open Innovations, (2014); Villasalero M., Pinar J.M., Garcia F.P., Technological innovation and dynamic capabilities in the Spanish wind energy business, Journal of Euromarketing, 20, 3-4, pp. 18-38, (2012); West J., Bogers M., Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 4, pp. 814-831, (2014); Westhead P., Storey D.J., An Assessment of Firms Located on and off Science Parks in the United Kingdom, (1994); Westhead P., Storey D.J., Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms, Omega, 23, 4, pp. 345-360, (1995); Westhead P., Storey D.J., Cowling M., An exploratory analysis of the factors associated with the survival of independent high-technology firms in Great Britain, Small Firms: Partnerships for Growth, pp. 63-99, (1995); Williams C., Lee S.H., Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations, Research Policy, 38, 8, pp. 1376-1387, (2009); Yang C.-H., Motohashi K., Chen J.-R., Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan, Research Policy, 38, 1, pp. 77-85, (2009)","","","Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.","","","","","","14691930","","","","English","J. Intellect. Cap.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84914118631"
"Kazantsev N.; Zakhlebin I.","Kazantsev, Nikolay (36237354600); Zakhlebin, Igor (56523322300)","36237354600; 56523322300","Measuring influence of internationalized universities on smart city development in terms of human capital and urban aspects","2014","Knowledge Management and E-Learning","6","4","","410","425","15","3","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84923192769&partnerID=40&md5=4fa8153bd76137b59123f4ac9cc312db","Faculty of Business Informatics, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation; International Lab of Applied Network Research (ANR), National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation","Kazantsev N., Faculty of Business Informatics, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation; Zakhlebin I., International Lab of Applied Network Research (ANR), National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation","Modern urban performance depends not only on the city's endorsement of hard infrastructure (physical capital), but also on the availability and quality of knowledge communication and social infrastructure (intellectual capital and social capital). This is one of the clear reasons why the concept of Smart Cities recently attracted a great amount of attention, both from academia and city planners. One of the challenges of the Smart City concept is how to raise human capital among people, such as making them culturally sensitive, mobile and to improve other social characteristics. This challenge is especially valid for industrial cities that are facing economic turbulence and a demand for revitalizing their public spaces and economic specialties. The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between the amount of international students in Russian universities with the positive changes that occur in a Russian student's human capital, and their neighbourhood areas, especially in public spaces. We aim to support the hypothesis that a network of ""internationalized"" universities serves as a revitalization measure for a city, facilitating the development of its surrounding areas, and reducing political and social risks within a society. Research methods for gathering data are: deductive trend search, which uses a literature review from leading academic journals and the empirical study based on the created questionnaire. This questionnaire forms a dataset which consists of a number of master courses held in English from one of the leading Russian universities based in Moscow. In this paper, we explain the research design and the results of a long-term project which we expect to complete in Russia in 2016. © 2014 Knowledge Management & E-Learning.","Higher education; Internationalization; Knowledge economics; Smart city; Urban development","","","","","","","","Altbach P.G., The foreign student dilemma, Comparative Higher Education: Knowledge, the University, and Development, pp. 161-178, (1998); Altbach P.G., Globalization and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world, Current Issues in Catholic Higher Education, 23, pp. 5-25, (2003); Altbach P.G., Knight J., The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities, Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 3-4, pp. 290-305, (2007); Asderaki F., Maragos D., The internationalization of higher education: The added value of the European portals and social media pages for the national and the institutional internationalization strategies, Proceedings of International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education, 13, pp. 498-510, (2012); Berry C.R., Glaeser E.L., The divergence of human capital levels across cities, Papers in Regional Science, 84, 3, pp. 407-444, (2005); Brandenberg U., Federkeil G., How to Measure Internationality and Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions: Indicators and Key Figures, (2007); Davis T., Flows of international students: Trends and issues, International Education Magazine, 1, pp. 2-4, (1995); De Wit H., Rationales for Internationalisation of Higher Education, (1998); De Wit H., Changing rationales for the internationalization of higher education, Internationalization of Higher Education: An Institutional Perspective, pp. 9-22, (2000); De Wit H., Internationalization of Higher Education in the United States of America and Europe: A Historical, Comparative and Conceptual Analysis, (2002); Deutsch K.W., From the NAFSA archives: Nationalistic responses to study abroad, International Educator, NAFSA, (1997); Florida R., Class and Well-being, (2009); Furham A.F., Bochner S., Social difficulty in a foreign culture: An empirical analysis of culture shock, Cultures in Contact: Studies in Cross-Cultural Interaction, pp. 161-198, (1982); Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., Pichler-Milanovic N., Meijers E., Smart Cities - Ranking of European Medium-sized Cities, (2007); Hammer M.R., Bennett M.J., Wiseman R., Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 4, pp. 421-443, (2003); Henry N., Pinch S., Spatialising knowledge: Placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley, Geoforum, 31, 2, pp. 191-208, (2000); Heyneman S.P., The growing international commercial market for educational goods and services, International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 4, pp. 345-359, (2001); Ischinger B., Puukka J., Universities for cities and regions: Lessons from the OECD reviews, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41, 3, pp. 8-13, (2009); Knight J., De Wit H., Strategies for internationalization of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives, Strategies for Internationalization of Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America, (1995); Lee J.J., Maldonado-Maldonado A., Rhoades G., The political economy of international student flows: Patterns, ideas, and propositions, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XXI, pp. 545-590, (2006); Li M., Cross-border Higher Education of Mainland Chinese Students: Hong Kong and Macao in A Globalizing Market, (2006); McConnell D., Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, (2000); OECD, Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged, (2007); Schrum L., Benson A., Online professional development: A case study of an MBA program through its transition to an online model, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4, 1, (2000); Shapiro J.M., Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 2, pp. 324-335, (2006); Volet S.E., Ang G., Culture mixed groups on international campuses: An opportunity on inter-cultural learning, Higher Education Research & Development, 17, 1, pp. 5-23, (1998); Wasserman S., Faust K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, 8, (1994); Yigitcanlar T., O'Connor K., Westerman C., The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne's knowledge-based urban development experience, Cities, 25, 2, pp. 63-72, (2008); Yigitcanlar T., Velibeyoglu K., Knowledge-based urban development: The local economic development path of Brisbane, Australia, Local Economy, 23, 3, pp. 195-207, (2008); Zheng X.H., An analysis on study abroad of graduates of undergraduate in Qinghua University, Research on China's Foreign Cultural Exchange in Higher Education, pp. 199-237, (2003); Zhu H., Ma Y., New patterns in higher education cross-cultural learning: The case of a postgraduate English instruction program in China, Frontiers of Education in China, 6, 4, pp. 471-494, (2011)","N. Kazantsev; Faculty of Business Informatics, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation; email: nkazantsev@hse.ru","","Hong Kong Bao Long Accounting And Secretarial Limited","","","","","","20737904","","","","English","Knowl. Manage. E-Learn.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-84923192769"
"Adhikari D.R.; Shrestha P.","Adhikari, Dev Raj (35434591800); Shrestha, Prakash (57769491400)","35434591800; 57769491400","Knowledge management initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal 4.7: higher education institutions’ stakeholder perspectives","2023","Journal of Knowledge Management","27","4","","1109","1139","30","20","10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0172","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133098898&doi=10.1108%2fJKM-03-2022-0172&partnerID=40&md5=fddc2f3b6a5f063fcd2675ea4606e487","School of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal; Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, Nepal Commerce Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal","Adhikari D.R., School of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal; Shrestha P., Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, Nepal Commerce Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal","Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore knowledge management (KM) initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 4.7 and to investigate enablers and barriers to insert KM to prepare higher education institutions (HEIs) ready to contribute to SDGs’ performance. At the end, this paper provides a practical perspective of KM initiatives for higher education for sustainable development (HESD). Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory study. It applies a descriptive-interpretative-qualitative approach. The analysis is based on the opinions collected from 170 HEIs’ stakeholders. Discussions among participants have been organized through zoom meetings, telephone interviews and focus group discussions in three phases. In the first phase, a total of 113 informants took part in the discussion on various dates. In the second phase, 10 interviews were conducted with university officials using three open-ended questions; and in the third phase, three focus group discussions were organized to interact about the effectiveness of the Masters in Business Administration in Global Leadership and Management programme and curriculum with teachers, students and the programme initiators. Findings: From the analysis of stakeholders’ views, it appears that Nepalese HEIs have yet to move forward with integrating KM activities into their aims, structure and functions to address the government’s policy guidelines applicable to maximizing SDG’ performance. A KM cultural framework that values intellectual capital is urgently needed to fill the knowledge-doing gap for the benefit of society. HEIs appear to require multidisciplinary teaching, learning and research methods to play a civic role in society. They have to improve their rules and regulation, develop a boundary-spanning structure from a conventional structure and apply KM initiatives to support achieving SDGs’ performance. Understanding and inculcating these initiatives in the academic programmes could provide a value-adding higher education in the country. Research limitations/implications: This paper is entirely based on the perspectives of stakeholders in higher education. So, understanding their points of view and perspectives may have resulted in vague explanations. Furthermore, because the setting of Nepal’s HEIs differs from that of developed countries, the results should only be interpreted in Nepalese contexts. Practical implications: This paper acknowledges the gaps and complexities in Nepalese HEIs from the standpoints of HEIs’ leaders, teachers and students for the application of KM initiatives to reform HEIs, with HESD in consideration, and enhance SDGs’ performance. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the paper is the first of its kind in the context of Nepal, exploring KM initiatives for SDGs. It provides a new perspective on KM and comprehends KM initiatives in the case of Nepalese HEIs transformation into HESD for achieving SDG 4.7. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.","Higher education institutions; Knowledge management; Knowledge management initiatives; Stakeholders; Sustainable development goals; University officials","","","","","","","","Adhikari D.R., Knowledge management in academic institutions, International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 2, pp. 94-104, (2010); Adhikari D.R., Shah B.B., The state of the art in the incorporation of sustainable development goals in Nepalese universities, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22, 6, pp. 1373-1401, (2021); Adomssent M., Fischer D., Godemann J., Herzig C., Otte I., Rieckmann M., Timm J., Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development–management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, pp. 1-7, (2014); The 58th auditor general report, Office of the Auditor General, (2021); Aleixo A.M., Azeiteiro U.M., Leal S., Toward sustainability through higher education: Sustainable development incorporation into Portuguese higher education institutions, Challenges in Higher Education for Sustainability, pp. 159-187, (2016); Aleixo A.M., Leal S., Azeiteiro U.M., Conceptualizations of sustainability in Portuguese higher education: roles, barriers and challenges toward sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp. 1664-1673, (2018); Aminbeidokhti A., Jamshidi L., MohammadiHoseini A., The effect of the total quality management on organizational innovation in higher education mediated by organizational learning, Studies in Higher Education, 41, 7, pp. 1153-1166, (2016); Ardito L., Ferraris A., MesseniPetruzzelli A., Bresciani S., Del Giudice M., The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, pp. 312-321, (2019); Ashton D.N., The impact of organizational structure and practices on learning in the work place, International Journal of Training and Development, 8, 1, pp. 43-53, (2004); Asiedu M.A., Anyigba H., Ofori K.S., Ampong G.O.A., Addae J.A., Factors influencing innovation performance in higher education institutions, The Learning Organization, 27, 4, pp. 365-378, (2020); Aujirapongpan S., Vadhanasindhu P., Chandrachai A., Cooparat P., Indicators of knowledge management capability for KM effectiveness, VINE, 40, 2, pp. 183-203, (2010); Barker C., Pistrang N., Elliott R., Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners, (2002); BarrantesBriceno C.E., Almada Santos F.C., Knowledge management, the missing piece in the 2030 agenda and SDGs puzzle, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20, 5, pp. 901-916, (2019); Bellarby L., Orange G., Knowledge sharing through communities of practice in the voluntary sector, Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management, (2006); Bhatt D., Model and knowledge management implications, (2000); Bohunovsky L., Radinger-Peer V., Penker M., Alliances of change pushing organizational transformation towards sustainability across 13 universities, Sustainability, 12, 7, pp. 69-88, (2020); Broman G., Robert K.H., Collins T.J., Basile G., Baumgartner R.J., Larsson T., Huisingh D., Science in support of systematic leadership towards sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 1-9, (2017); Chang D.L., Sabatini-Marques J., da Costa E.M., Selig P.M., Yigitcanlar T., Knowledge-based, smart and sustainable cities: a provocation for a conceptual framework, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4, 1, (2018); Charles W., Nawe J., Knowledge management practices in institutions of higher learning in Tanzania with reference to Mbeya university of science and technology, University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 12, pp. 48-65, (2017); Choi B., Poon S.K., Davis J.G., Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: a complementarity theory-based approach, Omega, 36, 2, pp. 235-251, (2008); Clair G.S., Drake M., Knowledge management, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, (2003); Davenport T.H., Prusak L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, (1998); Davenport T.H., DeLong D.W., Beers M.C., Successful knowledge management projects, Sloan Management Review, 39, 2, pp. 43-57, (1998); Davenport T., Hansen M., Knowledge management at Andersen consulting, Harvard Business School Case Study, (1999); Del Giudice M., Maggioni V., Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view, Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 5, pp. 841-846, (2014); Draghici A., Baban C.F., Gogan M.L., Ivascu L.V., A knowledge management approach for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, pp. 23-32, (2015); Du Plessis M., The role of knowledge management in innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 4, pp. 20-29, (2007); Elezi E., Role of knowledge management in developing higher education partnerships: towards a conceptual framework, system, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38, 3, pp. 279-293, (2021); Elezi E., Bamber C., Experiential examination of higher education partnerships in the UK: a knowledge management perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 26, 1, pp. 232-256, (2022); Elliott R., Timulak L., Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative, (2021); Esposito V., DeNito E., Iacono M.P., Silvestri L., Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: the role of performance management systems, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 3, pp. 431-450, (2013); Fridlund B., Hildingh C., Health and qualitative analysis methods, Qualitative Research, Methods in the Service of Health, Student Literature, Lund, pp. 13-25, (2000); Fukuda-Parr S., McNeill D., Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs: introduction to special issue, Global Policy, 10, S1, pp. 5-15, (2019); Garcia-Perez A., Ghio A., Occhipinti Z., Verona R., Knowledge management and intellectual capital in knowledge-based organisations: a review and theoretical perspectives, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 7, pp. 1719-1754, (2020); Gaulee U., International students negotiating higher education: critical perspectives, Journal of International Students, 4, 3, pp. 299-300, (2014); Godemann J., Bebbington J., Herzig C., Moon J., Higher education and sustainable development, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 2, pp. 218-233, (2014); Graedel T.E., Quantitative sustainability in a college or university setting, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3, 4, pp. 346-358, (2002); Grover V., Davenport T.H., General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1, pp. 5-21, (2001); Grybauskiene I., Jankauskiene Z., Kubiliene E., The impact of knowledge management on sustainable activities of higher education, EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 3, pp. 17-29, (2019); Halati A., He Y., Intersection of economic and environmental goals of sustainable development initiatives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, (2018); Hallinger P., Chatpinyakoop C., A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018, Sustainability, 11, 8, (2019); Heiss J., The role of higher education in sustainability science for implementing the SDGs, (2022); Hope A., Creating sustainable cities through knowledge exchange, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17, 6, pp. 796-811, (2016); Jimenez-Jimenez D., Martinez-Costa M., Sanz-Valle R., Knowledge management practices for innovation: a multinational corporation’s perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 5, pp. 905-918, (2014); Kaufman J., Ryan R., Hill S., Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication, Plos One, 13, 8, (2018); Khalili A., Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation supportive climate, Management Decision, 54, 9, pp. 2277-2293, (2016); Laal M., Knowledge management in higher education, Procedia Computer Science, 3, pp. 544-549, (2011); Leal Filho W., About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development, Higher Education Policy, 24, 4, pp. 427-438, (2011); Leal Filho W., Viewpoint: accelerating the implementation of the SDGs, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21, 3, pp. 507-511, (2020); Leal Filho W., Sustainable development policies as indicators and pre-conditions for sustainability efforts at universities: fact or fiction?, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19, 1, pp. 1-13, (2017); Leal Filho W., Paco A., Shiel C., Integrative approaches to environmental sustainability at universities: an overview of challenges and priorities, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12, 1, pp. 1-14, (2015); Leal Filho W., The role of planning in implementing sustainable development in a higher education context, Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, pp. 678-687, (2019); Loon M., Knowledge management practice system: theorising from an international meta-standard, Journal of Business Research, 94, pp. 432-441, (2019); Lozano R., A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp. 1-18, (2015); McInnes E., Middleton S., Gardner G., Haines M., Haertsch M., Paul C.L., Castaldi P., A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks, BMC Health Services Research, 12, 1, (2012); Mallow S., Toman I., Toman, Van't, Land H., Higher education and the 2030 agenda: moving into the ‘decade of action and delivery for the SDGs, IAU 2nd Global Survey Report on Higher Education and Research for Sustainable Development, (2020); Martins V.W.B., Rampasso I.S., Anholon R., Quelhas O.L.G., Leal Filho W., Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: literature review and opportunities for future research, Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, pp. 489-500, (2019); Massingham P., Al Holaibi M., Embedding knowledge management into business processes, Knowledge and Process Management, 24, 1, pp. 53-71, (2017); National Education Policy, Ministry of Education, (2019); National Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, (2019); Sustainable Development Goal 4: Education 2030 Nepal: National Framework, (2019); Economic survey 2021-2022, (2021); Morse J.M., The significance of saturation, Qualitative Health Research, 5, 2, pp. 147-149, (1995); Sustainable Development Goals Status and Roadmap: 2016–2030, (2017); The 15th plan 2019/2020-2023/2024, (2020); O'Malley B., 56 University presidents commit to joint action on SDGs, (2021); Oosterlinck A., University/industry knowledge management: a university perspective, pp. 1-20, (2001); Patton M., Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, (2002); Peachey T.A., An examination of the effects of cultural, climatic, structural, and technological factors on knowledge management effectiveness, (2006); Pinto M., Knowledge management in higher education institutions: a framework to improve collaboration, 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1-4, (2014); Pollard V., Wilson E., The entrepreneurial mindset in creative and performing arts higher education in Australia, Artivate, 3, 1, pp. 3-22, (2014); Probst G., Practical knowledge management: a model that works, Prism – Cambridge Massachusetts, pp. 17-30, (1998); Purcell W.M., Henriksen H., Spengler J.D., Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: ‘living labs’ for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20, 8, pp. 1343-1357, (2019); Quarchioni S., Paternostro S., Trovarelli F., Knowledge management in higher education: a literature review and further research avenues, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20, 2, pp. 1-16, (2020); Rieckmann M., Bormann I., Higher Education Institutions and Sustainable Development – Implementing a Whole-Institution Approach”, Sustainability, (2020); Rieckmann M., Gardiner S., Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objective, Education, 2030, (2017); Rijal M., Challenges of higher education: opinion, (2020); Roger E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, (2003); Rowley J., What is knowledge management?, Library Management, 20, 8, pp. 416-420, (1999); Rowley J., Is higher education ready for knowledge management?, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 7, pp. 325-333, (2000); Ruiz-Mallen I., Heras M., What sustainability? Higher education institutions: pathways to reach the agenda 2030 goals, Sustainability, 12, 4, pp. 51-68, (2020); Shawe R., Horan W., Moles R., O'Regan B., Mapping of sustainability policies and initiatives in higher education institutes, Environmental Science & Policy, 99, pp. 80-88, (2019); Singh S.K., Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding, Journal of Business Research, 97, pp. 10-19, (2019); Singh S.K., El-Kassar A.-N., Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, pp. 1264-1273,, (2019); Storey J., Barnett E., Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 2, pp. 145-156, (2000); Tan C.N.L., Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management, Higher Education, 71, 4, pp. 525-556, (2016); How can universities meaningfully and effectively use the SDGs?, (2020); Impact rankings 2021: methodology, (2021); Thomas J.C., Kellogg W.A., Erickson T., The knowledge management puzzle: human and social factors in knowledge management, IBM Systems Journal, 40, 4, pp. 863-884, (2001); Trencher G., Bai X., Evans J., McCormick K., Yarime M., University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability, Global Environmental Change, 28, pp. 153-165, (2014); Tseng S.M., Knowledge management capability, customer relationship management, and service quality, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29, 2, pp. 202-221, (2016); Vision 2030 unpublished report, Higher Education Reform Project (HERP) Implementation Office, (2019); Education Management Information System, (2020); Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, (2015); United nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005-2014): international implementation scheme, (2005); Shaping the future we want-UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005-2014) final report, (2014); Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap, (2020); Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development, (2010); Upadhyay P., University education in Nepal: issues, (2018); Van Horne C., Dutot V., Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 2, pp. 285-301, (2017); Van Horne C., Dutot V., Castellano S., Sosa M., Ahmad L., Integrating entrepreneurship into the design classroom: case studies from the developing world, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 1, pp. 56-72, (2021); Van Horne S., Henze M., Schuh K.L., Colvin C., Russell J.E., Facilitating adoption of an interactive e-textbook among university students in a large, introductory biology course, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 3, pp. 477-495, (2017); Veer Ramjeawon P., Rowley J., Knowledge management in higher education institutions: enablers and barriers in Mauritius, The Learning Organization, 24, 5, pp. 366-377, (2017); Verhulst E., Lambrechts W., Fostering the incorporation of sustainable development in higher education. Lessons learned from a change management perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp. 189-204, (2015); Waas T., Huge J., Ceulemans K., Lambrechts W., Vandenabeele J., Lozano R., Wright T., Sustainable Higher Education- Understanding and Moving Forward, (2012); Our common future, (1987); Weber L.E., Dudarstadt J.J., Global sustainability and the responsibilities of universities, (2012); Yigitcanlar T., Knowledge-based urban development redefined: from theory to practice knowledge-based development of cities, Summit Proceedings of the 4th Knowledge Cities World Summit. The World Capital Institute and Ibero-American Community for Knowledge Systems, pp. 389-399, (2011); Zinkernagel R., Evans K., Neij L., Applying the SDGs to cities: business as usual or a new dawn?, Sustainability, 10, 9, (2018)","P. Shrestha; Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal Commerce Campus, Nepal; email: mrprakashshrestha@gmail.com","","Emerald Publishing","","","","","","13673270","","","","English","J. Knowl. Manag.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85133098898"
"Melamed-Varela E.; Navarro-Vargas L.; Blanco-Ariza A.B.; Olivero-Vega E.","Melamed-Varela, Enrique (57195609749); Navarro-Vargas, Leonardo (57214988530); Blanco-Ariza, Ana B. (57196370106); Olivero-Vega, Enohemit (57193423245)","57195609749; 57214988530; 57196370106; 57193423245","University-Industry-Government linkage to promote innovation at regional systems: Documentary research; [Vínculo Universidad-Empresa-Estado para el fomento de la innovación en sistemas regionales: Estudio documental]","2019","Revista de Estudios Regionales","","114","","147","169","22","5","","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079655794&partnerID=40&md5=441ac9bc6d9f7e8f3c1c7da432a3ef65","Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia","Melamed-Varela E., Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; Navarro-Vargas L., Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; Blanco-Ariza A.B., Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; Olivero-Vega E., Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia","The state of the art on innovation has allowed the position which rank the concept like a key tool in processes of organizations at knowledge's society, that characterizes the territories and regions of today, however, their appropriation still presents limitations on organizations, positioning itself as possible causes: The scarce investment in science and technology by some regions or the entrenched traditionalist thinking from some type of organizations, especially in contexts such as Latin American, where these limitations still prevail in the performance of various territorial actors including some business, higher education's institutions and government agencies. The theoretical framework of this paper, has focused on regional innovation systems as a point of reference for competitiveness and innovation and economic development on territories, at the same way it has been exposed relevance acquired between industry, university and government actors in collective construction of platforms for growth and economic development in territories, and for their integration and social cohesion; finally, regional strategy for promotion and execution of scientific research, development and innovation projects whose results contributes to respond to the needs and social problems which each territorial environment presents. The analyzed theoretical referents agree on idea that the Latin America context, despite its advances in economic growth, still require improve the results of its innovation regional systems and evidence a greater work of its social institutions, in such a way that through a constructive form of actors, which is aimed to generate and develop innovative processes; at same way, that knowledge is positioned as one of assets of organizations that facilitate to appropriation of innovative activity, being the linking element of proposed institutions in triple helix model, since its directly related to scientific research activity for its construction (higher education institutions), its practical application (industry and business companies) and the definition of policies of scientific and academic according to regional interests (government). On this way, the diverse theories of university-industry-government linkage has been seen as a key concept to build capabilities and initiatives to promote the design and execution of projects adjusted to regional resources and capacities, which responses the problems of each context, however, today to deeper dependence on the subject, requiring a glimpse of the dependence between actors, power relations and expected results through collective constructions that allow evidence of university-industry-government linkage and contribute to improving conditions and performance of regional systems of innovation on different territorial competitiveness reports. Extrapolating the concepts which has been analyzed in the case of Colombia, starting from the results in science, technology and innovation how referents about territorial performance, it becomes evident the limited investment of Gross Domestic Product in research and development stands out, characterizing the national territory for its heterogeneity of results both on the relative contribution to economic structure from the country, as the performance of its regional innovation systems; in spite of the direction in subjects which have been directed towards achievement of major recognitions on international scientific communities and under standards that advocate for the high quality of the scientific production. The results of the national science, technology and innovation policy in Colombia are also aimed at improving the quality of results of scientific production, as well as the formation of high level human capital and social appropriation from different knowledge, looking for the joint working from universities, technological development centers, business companies and the government, as a link oriented to achievement of programs and projects responding to problems demanded by different scenarios and parts of country's national science, technology and innovation system. For development of documentary review, the study assumes an descriptive-documentary research approach, which has been methodologically based on secondary sources that characterized by their scientific contribution, formalization in official platforms and circuits with international visibility; in such a way that the arguments set forth are supported by reliable and up-to-date information on academic and scientific debates that take place at the frontiers of knowledge about the promotion of innovation in university-industry-government organizations and relationships at territorial contexts. Documentary review has reached a total of 58 bibliographical references among scientific articles, specialized books, papers from academic conferences and official documents from certified entities, which has been developed under a constructivist and critical approach, it's given a conceptual construct of innovation and the different forms of university-industry-government linkage and its convergence like actors in the dynamics of the system of science, technology and innovation, as well as the forces which determine the innovative processes of territories and the role that the concepts have acquired on the basis for the fundamental decisions and the actions of interrelationship with interest groups to promote knowledge and innovation. The results and contributions to academic discussion for the promotion of innovation from the university-industry-government linkage, it has been determined in main characteristics which have been alluded to the concept on science, technology and innovation national system, materialized their results in: Categorization of research groups, highly innovative companies, higher impact scientific production, among others. These elements have been positioned as indicators of competitive performance and generators of economic development in territories with the principles of innovative activity applied to organizations, according to its development in the front of sciences and the practical exercise in different disciplines which integrate schools in higher education institutions and activities of each business or government agency; fortifying the public service of education and performance of human and intellectual capital at territories and innovation regional systems. This series of data, also allow establish the real image of a territorial system, which has made significant progress in science, technology and innovation, but still requires greater efforts to advance the construction of a distinguished scientific nation that develop projects of high impact from the communion university-industry-government, its aimed to achieve a better private investment in research, development and innovation, reach a critical mass of researchers according to the number of higher education institutions, high-level scientific production according with quality standards of international scientific communities, its entrepreneurial nature leads actions that respond to social problems and fosters collective construction for the sustainable development of their knowledge, quality education, value added goods and services and a sustainable socio-economic environment based on knowledge, technology and innovation. © 2019 Asociacion Universidades Publicas de Andalucia. All rights reserved.","Innovation; Knowledge-based economy; Regional Systems; Triple Helix; University-Industry-Government Linkage","","","","","","","","Albornoz M., Indicadores de innovación: Las dificultades de un concepto en evolución, Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia Tecnologiá y Sociedad, 5, 13, pp. 9-25, (2009); Amar P., Diazgranados J.F., Modelo de relación estado-mercado para el fomento de la innovación, Investigación & Desarrollo, 14, 1, pp. 200-225, (2006); Amar P., Miranda R., Hacia Dónde Vamos en, pp. 133-145, (2014); Amar P., Angulo G., Ortega M., Quintero J., El sistema de innovación del departamento del atlántico: Una mirada desde la cibernética organizacional, Revista GTI, 5, 12, pp. 55-62, (2006); Arencibia. J.R., De Moya-Anegon F., La evaluación de la investigación científica: Una aproximación teórica desde la cienciometriá, ACIMED, 17, 4, pp. 1-27, (2008); Arraut L.C., Amar P., Duque J., Hacia un modelo de emprendimiento de innovación abierta socialmente responsable: Caso Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar en Colombia, TEC Empresarial, 3, 1-2, pp. 33-44, (2009); Azagra-Caro J.M., Access to universities' public knowledge: Who's more nationalist?, Scientometrics, 91, 3, pp. 671-691, (2012); Azagra-Caro J.M., Consoli D., Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1, pp. 152-172, (2016); Gasto en Investigación y Desarrollo (% Del PIB). Recuperado Desde Instituto de Estadística de la UNESCO, Disponible En:, (2015); Behar D., Introducción a la Metodologiá de la Investigación, (2008); Bolivar A., Los centros educativos como organizaciones que aprenden: Una mirada crítica, Contexto Educativo, 3, 18, pp. 1-11, (2001); Brunner J.J., Gobernanza Universitaria: Tipologiá, Dinámicas y Tendencias, Revista de Educación, 355, pp. 137-159, (2011); Christensen C.M., The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, (2013); Christensen C.M., Eyring H.J., The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside out, (2011); COLCIENCIAS, Colombia le Sigue Apostando a la Inversión Privada en Ciencia, Tecnologiá e Innovación, (2016); Documento de Actualización de Los Sistemas de Indexación y Resumen-SIR, (2017); Cortes F.A., La relación universidad-entorno socioeconómico y la innovación, Ingenieriá e Investigación, 26, 2, pp. 94-101, (2006); Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ""mode 2"" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 109-123, (2000); Etzkowitz H., The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action Inc, (2008); Fathollahi J., Momeni F., Elahi N., Sajjad S., Appropriate theoretical framework for understanding and analyzing economic issues in knowledge-based economy, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 3, pp. 957-976, (2017); Girard B., El Modelo Google: Una Revolución Administrativa (Esperanza Meléndez, Trad.), (2007); Gonzalez-Ramos M.I., Donate-Manzanares M.J., Guadamillas-Gomez F., Alegre-Vidal J., Relación entre el dinamismo percibido la postura tecnológica y los resultados de innovación, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9, 2, pp. 131-144, (2014); Jimenez F., Fernandez De Lucio I., Menendez A., Los Sistemas Regionales de Innovación: Experiencias concretas en América Latina, Los Sistemas Regionales de Innovación en América Latina, pp. 58-103, (2011); Karlsen J., Larrea M., Desarrollo Territorial e Investigación Acción. Innovación a Través Del Diálogo, (2015); Kerry C., Danson M., Open Innovation Triple Helix Regional Innovation Systems: Exploring CATAPULT Centres in the UK, Industry and Higher Education, 30, 1, pp. 67-78, (2016); Leydesdorff L., Ivanova I.A., Open Innovation' and 'Triple Helix' models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured?, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2, 11, pp. 1-12, (2016); Mancha T., Moscoso F., Santos J.L., Un índice de competitividad regional para Espanã, Revista de Estudios Regionales, 109, pp. 67-94, (2017); Marquez A., Perez L., Análisis relacional entre capital intelectual y el desarrollo organizacional en la universidad, Gestión y Gerencia, 9, 3, pp. 48-74, (2015); Mazzucato M., The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs Private Sector Myths, (2015); Melamed-Varela E., Miranda-Medina C., Transferencia tecnológica en la educación, Educación y Humanismo, 18, 31, pp. 180-185, (2016); Mendez R., Innovación y desarrollo territorial: Algunos debates teóricos recientes, EURE, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano-Regionales, 28, 84, pp. 63-83, (2002); Miguel S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z., De Moya-Anegon F., Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 6, pp. 1130-1145, (2011); Natario M., Braga A., Couto J., Tiago T., Estándares Territoriales de Innovación: Análisis de las Regiones de Portugal, Revista de Estudios Regionales, 3, pp. 15-38, (2012); Navarro M., Los sistemas regionales de innovación. Una revisión crítica, EKONOMIAZ. Revista Vasca de Economiá, 70, 1, pp. 25-59, (2009); Manual de Frascati, Propuesta de Norma Práctica Para Encuestas de Investigación y Desarrollo Experimental, (2002); Manual de Oslo, Guiá Para la Recogida e Interpretación de Datos Sobre Innovación. (3a Ed.), (2005); Ortiz-Ospino L., Análisis del sistema regional de ciencia, tecnologiá e innovación en el departamento del Atlántico, Colombia, Desarrollo Gerencial, 4, 2, pp. 72-103, (2012); Perez A., Pertuz V., Torres M., Análisis de la ciencia, tecnologiá e innovación desde la actividad de los observatorios en Colombia y Venezuela, Revista Espacios, 38, 32, pp. 24-39, (2017); Pineda K., Morales M.E., Ortiz M.C., Modelos y mecanismos de interacción universidad-empresa-Estado: Retos para las universidades colombianas, Equidad y Desarrollo, 15, pp. 41-67, (2011); Porter M.E., Ketels C., Delgado M., The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index, The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008, pp. 51-81, (2007); Porter M., Sachs J., McArthur J., Executive Summary: Competitiveness and Stages of Economic Development, pp. 16-25, (2001); Resolucio N., De La Convocatoria 781 De 2017 1.P.L.C.S.P.L.R.D., (2017); Yaneth Giha le Apuesta Al Desarrollo Científico, (2014); Rodriguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R., Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe, Regional Studies, 42, 1, pp. 51-67, (2008); Rozga R., Sistemas regionales de innovación: Antecedentes, origen y perspectivas. Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 10, 33, pp. 225-248, (2003); Torres E.P., Cedillo J.P., La concepción del cambio en el pensamiento organizacional tradicional y las alternativas necesarias para Latinoamérica, Cuadernos Latinoamericanos, 24, 44, pp. 29-54, (2013); Torres-Salazar P., Melamed-Varela E., Uso de T-PACK Como Estrategia de Transferencia de Conocimiento en Las Universidades, pp. 194-216, (2016); Trzcieliski S., The influence of knowledge-based economy on agility of enterprise, Procedia, Manufacturing, 3, pp. 6615-6623, (2015); Villanueva L.N., El camino de la innovación hacia la competitividad, Memorias Del I Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Administración la Competitividad y la Innovación en la Empresa de Hoy, (2011)","","","Asociacion Universidades Publicas de Andalucia","","","","","","02137585","","","","Spanish","Rev. Estud. Reg.","Article","Final","","Scopus","2-s2.0-85079655794"
"Limon M.L.S.; Tovar Y.S.; Villazul J.J.","Limon, Monica Lorena Sanchez (57204956060); Tovar, Yesenia Sanchez (56394674700); Villazul, Javier Jasso (42861597500)","57204956060; 56394674700; 42861597500","Characterization of intellectual capital in public Mexican universities; [Caracterización del capital intelectual en las universidades públicas. Estudio comparativo]","2021","International Journal of Professional Business Review","6","1","","1","17","16","2","10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.203","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105609747&doi=10.26668%2fbusinessreview%2f2021.v6i1.203&partnerID=40&md5=b376d5ebc17807411dc1caa4eeb236b7","Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Victoria, Mexico; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico","Limon M.L.S., Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Victoria, Mexico; Tovar Y.S., Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Victoria, Mexico; Villazul J.J., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico","Objective: characterize and compare the intellectual capital in Mexican universities. Methodology / Approach: The study was based on a semi structured survey applied to 102 professors-researchers in four Mexican state universities of the business and administration area. Originality / Relevance: Universities are a source of knowledge; therefore their competitive advantage lies in the configuration of this element to encourage their performance. Thus, the issue of intellectual capital tends to have greater relevance in order to understand this dynamic in the different productive actors and users of knowledge such as universities. Main results: The results show that there are six relevant sub-dimensions of intellectual capital from which levels of intellectual capital are characterized in each university. Theoretical / methodological contributions: intellectual capital refers to the knowledge in organizations enabling them to generate value. Intellectual capital studies are approached from the perspective of companies, however there are few done from the perspective of universities. © 2021 AOS-Estratagia and Inovacao. All rights reserved.","Intellectual capital; Measurement; Public Mexican Universities; Scientific knowledge; Teacher","","","","","","","","Alama E., Capital intelectual y resultados empresariales en las empresas de servicios Profesionales de España, (2008); Amit R., Shoemaker P., Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 33-46, (1993); Becker B., Huselid M., Ulrich D., The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance, (2001); Bernardez M., Capital Intelectual, creación de valor en la sociedad del conocimiento, (2008); Bhatt G., Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 1, pp. 15-26, (2001); Bontis N., Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36, 2, pp. 63-76, (1998); Bornemann M., Sammer M., Intellectual capital report as an assessment instrument for strategic governance of research and technology network, Conference paper at Organizational Knowledge and Learning Conference OKLC, (2004); Bradley K., Intellectual capital and the new wealth of nations II, Business Strategy Review, 8, 4, pp. 33-44, (1997); Brooking A., Intellectual Capital core asset for the Third Milleniunm, (1996); Brooking A., Intellectual Capital Core Asset for the Third Millennium, (1996); Brooking A., El Capital Intelectual, El Principal Activo de las Empresas del Tercer Milenio, (1997); Bueno Campos E., El Capital Intangible como Clave Estratégica en la Competencia Actual, Boletín de Estudios Económicos, 53, pp. 207-229, (1998); Bueno E., Modelo Intellectus, Medición y Gestión del Capital Intelectual, (2003); Bueno E., Gestión del conocimiento en universidades y organismos públicos de investigación, (2004); Bueno E., Morcillo P., Rodriguez J., Luque M., Indicadores de capital intelectual aplicados a la actividad investigadora y de gestión del conocimiento en las universidades y centros públicos de investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid, Capital intelectual y producción científica, pp. 19-70, (2002); Carmeli A., Tishler A., The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance, Strategic management journal, 25, 13, pp. 1257-1278, (2004); Corcoles Y., Lizano M., Caracterización del comportamiento de las universidades españolas en relación con la divulgación de información sobre intangibles, Revista De Estudios Regionales, 97, pp. 15-49, (2013); Corona L., Jasso J., Enfoques y características de la sociedad del conocimiento. Evolución y perspectivas para México, Innovación en la sociedad del conocimiento, pp. 9-40, (2005); Cortez J., Cornejo R., Impacto del capital intelectual en facultades de negocios de las universidades públicas, Sotavento MBA, 22, pp. 68-81, (2013); Chang L., Birkett B., Managing intellectual capital in a professional service firm: exploring the creativity-productivity paradox, Management Accounting Research, 15, 1, pp. 7-31, (2003); Choo Huang C., Luther R., Tayles M., An evidence‐based taxonomy of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, pp. 386-408, (2007); Delgado-Verde M., Martin-de Castro G., Navas-Lopez J., Cruz-Gonzalez J., Capital social, capital intelectual e innovación de producto. Evidencia empírica en sectores manufactureros intensivos en tecnología, Innovar, 23, 50, pp. 93-110, (2013); Drucker P., Postcapitalist Society, (1993); Drucker P., Managing in a time of great change, (1995); Dutrenit G., Acumulación de capacidades tecnológicas en la industrica maquiladora, Comercio Exterior, 55, 7, pp. 574-586, (2005); Dutrenit G., Puchet Anyul M., Teubal M., Building bridges between co-evolutionary approaches to science, technology and innovation and development economics: an interpretive model, Innovation and Development, 1, 1, pp. 51-74, (2011); Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, European management journal, pp. 356-364, (1996); Edvinsson L., Malone M. S., Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower, (1997); Edvinsson L., Malone M., El capital intelectual, Cómo identificar y calcular el valor inexplotado de los recursos intangibles de su empresa, (2004); Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Terra B. R., The Future of the University and the University of the Future, Evolution of Ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp. 313-330, (2000); Medición del Capital Intelectual, (1998); Fazlagic A., Measuring the intellectual capital of a university. Trends in the management of human resources in higher education, (2005); Funes Y., Valuación de los activos intangibles, El caso de la UNAM, (2007); Hair J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R., Análisis Multivariante, (1999); Hobday M., Innovación en Asia oriental, diversidad y desarrollo, Tecnovación, 15, 2, pp. 55-63, (1995); Isaac R., Herremans I., Kline T., Intellectual capital management: pathways to wealth creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 1, pp. 81-92, (2009); Jasso V, Torres A., La gestión del conocimiento en las empresas y organizaciones, el dilema de la absorción, creación, resguardo y aprendizaje, Revue de Sciences de Gestion, pp. 285-302, (2008); Jasso J., Relevancia de la Innovación y las Redes Institucionales, Revista Aportes, 7, 25, pp. 5-18, (2004); Kaplan R., Norton D., Evaluación de los Resultados, Algo más que Números, Harvard Deusto Business Review, 55, pp. 18-25, (1993); Leitner K.-H., Intellectual capital reporting for universities, conceptual background and applications for Austian universities, Research evaluations, 13, 2, pp. 129-140, (2004); Lopez Ruiz V., Nevado D., Banos J., Indicador sintético del capital intelectual, humano y estructural, Un factor de competitividad, Revista Eure, XXXIV, 101, pp. 45-70, (2008); Mantilla S., Capital intelectual y contabilidad del conocimiento, (2004); Martin G., Alama E., Navas J. E., Lopez P., El papel del capital intelectual en la innovación tecnológica, Un aplicación a las empresas de servicios profesionales de España, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 12, 40, pp. 83-109, (2009); Medellin E., Competencias tecnológicas y de contenido necesarias para capacitar en la producción de recursos de aprendizaje móvil, Edutece Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, pp. 1-16, (2012); Mercado Salgado P., Demuner Flores M., Nava Rogel R. M., Medición de Capital Intelectual en Instituciones de Educación Superior, Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings, 8, 2, pp. 652-658, (2013); Monagas-Docasal M., El capital intelectual y la gestión del conocimiento, Ingeniería Industrial, 33, 2, pp. 142-150, (2012); Moon Y., Kym H., A Model for the Value of Intellectual Capital, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 23, 3, pp. 253-269, (2006); Nava-Rogel R., Mercado-Salgado P., Análisis de trayectoria del capital intellectual en una Universidad pública mexicana, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 13, 2, pp. 166-187, (2011); Norena C. A., Gestión del conocimiento, capital intelectual y comunicación en grupos de investigación, Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, pp. 1-25, (2009); Nunally J., Psychometric Theory, (1979); Ramirez Y., Lorduy C., Rojas J., Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 4, pp. 732-748, (2007); Ramirez Y., Santos J., Tejeda A., Demanda de información sobre capital intelectual en las Universidades Públicas Españolas, Cuadernos de Gestión, 12, 1, pp. 83-106, (2012); Rivero Diaz D., Modelo conceptual para la medición del capital intelectual y un procedimiento para su implementación, Caso hotelero, (2009); Rodriguez Castellanos A., Urrutia Gutierrez J., La gestión del conocimiento científico-técnico en la universidad, un caso y un proyecto, Cuadernos de Gestión, 1, 1, pp. 13-30, (2001); Ross J., Dragonetti N. C., Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital, Navigating in the New Business Landscape, (1997); Saint-Onge H., Tacit knowledge the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital, Planning Review, 24, 2, pp. 10-16, (1996); Sanchez Limon M. L., Sanchez Tovar Y., Garcia F. F., El capital intelectual en una institución de educación superior, Gestión del capital intelectual, pp. 109-133, (2015); Sanchez P., Elena S., Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 4, pp. 529-548, (2006); Sebastian J., Estrategias de cooperación universitaria para la formación de investigadores en Iberoamérica, (2003); Siegel L., Measuring and Managing Intellectual Capital in the U.S. Aerospace Industry (Tesis doctoral), (2004); Stewart T., La Nueva Riqueza de las Organizaciones, El Capital Intelectual, (1998); Stewart T. A., Brainpower: how intellectual capital becoming America´s most valuable asset, Fortune, 123, 11, pp. 44-60, (1991); Syeiby K., Knowledge Management, la nouvelle richesse des entreprisess, (2000); Syeiby K. E., The Intangible Assets Monitor, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 2, pp. 73-97, (1997); Tippins M., Sohi R., IT competency and firm performance, Is organizational learning a missing link, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 8, pp. 745-761, (2003); Topete C., Bustos E., Sociedad del Conocimiento y Gestión de Capital Intelectual en Instituciones de Educación Superior Públicas Mexicanas, (2008); Torres A., Jasso J., Capacidades y transferencia de tecnología en las universidades, El caso del área de la biomedicina en la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Vinculación universidad-sector productivo para fortalecer los sistemas nacionles de innovación, experiencias de Cuba, México y Costa Rica, pp. 323-350, (2017); Torres A., Jasso J., Capabilities and knowledge transfer: evidence from a university research center in the health area in Mexico, Contaduría y Administración, 64, S1, pp. 1-16, (2019); Youndt M. A., Subramaniam M., Snell S. A., Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns, Journal of Management studies, 41, 2, pp. 335-361, (2004)","","","AOS-Estratagia and Inovacao","","","","","","25253654","","","","Spanish","Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85105609747"
